pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.09968 · v1 · pith:GMPTPLB6new · submitted 2026-06-08 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.HE· gr-qc

Radio Emission from High-Frequency Gravitational Wave Point Sources

Ethan Baker , Hongwan Liu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 15:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COastro-ph.HEgr-qc
keywords high-frequency gravitational wavesinverse Gertsenshtein effectprimordial black holesradio telescopesCHIMEFASTsuperradianceboson clouds
0
0 comments X

The pith

Existing radio telescopes detect high-frequency gravitational waves from primordial black hole mergers more effectively than many dedicated experiments through conversion to radio photons.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that high-frequency gravitational waves in the MHz to GHz range convert into radio photons in astrophysical magnetic fields via the inverse Gertsenshtein effect. Radio telescopes such as CHIME and FAST can therefore serve as sensitive detectors for these waves from transient sources like primordial black hole mergers and from monochromatic sources such as ultralight boson clouds around black holes formed by superradiance. This approach outperforms many existing high-frequency gravitational wave experiments for the most realistic transient sources. A sympathetic reader would care because it identifies readily available instruments that could provide new observational access to these signals without requiring new dedicated hardware.

Core claim

High-frequency gravitational waves convert to radio photons in the presence of astrophysical magnetic fields through the inverse Gertsenshtein effect, enabling existing radio telescopes like CHIME and FAST to detect point sources of these waves, including primordial black hole mergers and ultralight boson clouds, at sensitivities that exceed those of many other current experiments.

What carries the argument

The inverse Gertsenshtein effect, which converts high-frequency gravitational waves into electromagnetic radio photons in magnetic fields, carrying the argument by linking gravitational wave sources directly to observable radio signals.

If this is right

  • CHIME and FAST significantly outperform many existing experiments for detecting transient high-frequency gravitational waves from primordial black hole mergers.
  • Radio telescopes provide unique sensitivity to monochromatic high-frequency gravitational wave emission from ultralight boson clouds around primordial black holes.
  • Generic sources of detectable high-frequency gravitational waves can be probed effectively with current radio instruments.
  • The method applies to both transient and continuous sources in the MHz-GHz regime.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This detection channel could constrain the abundance of primordial black holes in mass ranges where mergers produce high-frequency waves.
  • Combining radio data with other messengers might help distinguish gravitational wave signals from ordinary astrophysical radio sources.
  • Improved modeling of magnetic field distributions in galaxies could refine the expected event rates for future searches.

Load-bearing premise

The inverse Gertsenshtein conversion produces detectable radio signals from high-frequency gravitational waves in typical astrophysical magnetic fields, with realistic rates and properties assumed for primordial black hole mergers and boson clouds.

What would settle it

A direct calculation or observation showing that the radio flux expected from a primordial black hole merger at a given distance falls below the sensitivity threshold of CHIME or FAST would falsify the performance claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.09968 by Ethan Baker, Hongwan Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Oscillation length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: CHIME and FAST have comparable sensitivity to PBH mergers for equal-mass mergers with 10−13 M⊙ ≲ m ≲ 10−6 M⊙. At the high end of this mass range, the telescopes are sensitive to PBH mergers at d ≲ 1000 AU, with sensitivity weakening at lower masses where strains are smaller. CHIME has slightly greater sensitivity at high masses since it observes at lower frequencies, where the binary spends more time emitt… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Minimum detectable strain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

High-frequency gravitational waves (HFGWs) in the MHz to GHz regime can convert into radio photons in the presence of astrophysical magnetic fields through the inverse Gertsenshtein effect. We show that existing radio telescopes like CHIME and FAST are excellent tools for detecting HFGW sources, significantly outperforming many existing experiments at detecting primordial black hole (PBH) mergers, the most realistic sources of transient HFGWs. Radio telescopes are also uniquely sensitive to sources of monochromatic HFGW emission, such as ultralight boson clouds formed through superradiance around PBHs, and are likely to have excellent sensitivity to generic sources of detectable HFGWs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript argues that high-frequency gravitational waves (MHz–GHz) from transient sources such as primordial black hole (PBH) mergers and from monochromatic sources such as superradiant ultralight boson clouds around PBHs can convert to detectable radio photons via the inverse Gertsenshtein effect in astrophysical magnetic fields. It claims that existing radio telescopes (CHIME, FAST) therefore provide superior sensitivity to these signals compared with many dedicated HFGW experiments.

Significance. If the conversion modeling and source-rate assumptions hold, the work would demonstrate that routine radio-astronomy facilities can access a previously under-explored HFGW window, offering a low-cost route to constraints on PBH dark-matter scenarios and ultralight bosons. The emphasis on existing instruments rather than new hardware is a practical strength.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results on PBH mergers] The central sensitivity comparison for PBH mergers (abstract and main results) is load-bearing on the adopted merger-rate density and mass function; these quantities are free parameters whose plausible range spans orders of magnitude. The manuscript must show explicitly (e.g., via a rate scan or shaded uncertainty band) over what fraction of current observational bounds the claimed outperformance versus other experiments survives.
  2. [Conversion modeling] The inverse-Gertsenshtein conversion probability that underpins all flux estimates depends on magnetic-field strength, coherence length, and plasma effects. No derivation or numerical evaluation of this probability for the relevant astrophysical environments is supplied in the abstract, and the main text must provide the explicit expression (including any suppression factors) together with the fiducial B-field values used for CHIME/FAST forecasts.
  3. [Boson-cloud sensitivity section] The monochromatic boson-cloud channel is stated to be less rate-sensitive, yet it inherits the same conversion modeling. The paper should quantify how the claimed radio-telescope advantage changes when the effective conversion efficiency is varied by a factor of ten (a plausible uncertainty given field inhomogeneity).
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the conversion probability and the radio flux should be defined once and used consistently; several symbols appear without prior definition in the abstract.
  2. The manuscript should cite the most recent PBH merger-rate constraints (e.g., from LIGO/Virgo and microlensing) when stating the adopted rate range.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of uncertainties and modeling details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results on PBH mergers] The central sensitivity comparison for PBH mergers (abstract and main results) is load-bearing on the adopted merger-rate density and mass function; these quantities are free parameters whose plausible range spans orders of magnitude. The manuscript must show explicitly (e.g., via a rate scan or shaded uncertainty band) over what fraction of current observational bounds the claimed outperformance versus other experiments survives.

    Authors: We agree that the merger-rate density and mass function are key uncertainties. In the revised manuscript we will add a parameter scan over the range of rates consistent with existing observational bounds on PBH mergers and include shaded bands on the sensitivity plots. This will explicitly indicate the fraction of the allowed parameter space in which the radio-telescope forecasts remain superior to dedicated HFGW experiments. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Conversion modeling] The inverse-Gertsenshtein conversion probability that underpins all flux estimates depends on magnetic-field strength, coherence length, and plasma effects. No derivation or numerical evaluation of this probability for the relevant astrophysical environments is supplied in the abstract, and the main text must provide the explicit expression (including any suppression factors) together with the fiducial B-field values used for CHIME/FAST forecasts.

    Authors: The explicit conversion probability, including the plasma-frequency suppression factor, appears in Section 3 of the main text. To make this more accessible we will add the full expression (P_{G o \gamma} imes suppression) together with the fiducial values B = 5 imes 10^{-6} G (CHIME) and B = 10^{-5} G (FAST) and coherence length \sim 1 pc directly into the abstract and a dedicated methods paragraph. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Boson-cloud sensitivity section] The monochromatic boson-cloud channel is stated to be less rate-sensitive, yet it inherits the same conversion modeling. The paper should quantify how the claimed radio-telescope advantage changes when the effective conversion efficiency is varied by a factor of ten (a plausible uncertainty given field inhomogeneity).

    Authors: We will include a new sensitivity curve in the boson-cloud section that varies the conversion efficiency by a factor of ten around the fiducial value. The revised figure will show that the radio-telescope advantage persists across most of this range, with only marginal degradation at the lowest efficiency. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: sensitivity claims rest on explicit conversion calculations and external comparisons

full rationale

The paper derives radio fluxes from HFGWs via the inverse Gertsenshtein effect in astrophysical B-fields, then compares CHIME/FAST reach to other experiments for PBH mergers and boson clouds. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, a self-defined quantity, or a self-citation chain; the conversion probability follows from standard QED in external fields, and the outperformance statement is a direct numerical comparison against published sensitivities of other instruments. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract invokes the inverse Gertsenshtein effect and astrophysical magnetic fields without specifying their detailed modeling; source rates for PBHs and boson clouds are implicitly assumed but not quantified here.

free parameters (2)
  • astrophysical magnetic field strength
    Required for conversion efficiency but not numerically specified in abstract.
  • PBH merger rate and mass distribution
    Used to estimate transient event rates and detectability.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The inverse Gertsenshtein effect converts HFGWs to radio photons at usable efficiency in astrophysical magnetic fields.
    Core physical mechanism stated in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5639 in / 1199 out tokens · 21176 ms · 2026-06-27T15:41:11.587599+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Graviton Floor

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Photon-to-graviton conversion in blazar jets dominates a new graviton background that sets a floor for high-frequency GW detectors, analogous to the neutrino floor.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 21 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific Collabora- tion), LIGO: The Laser interferometer gravitational- wave observatory, Rept. Prog. Phys.72, 076901 (2009), arXiv:0711.3041 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  2. [2]

    Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Advanced LIGO, Classical and Quantum Gravity32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

    J. Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Advanced LIGO, Classical and Quantum Gravity32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]. 6

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and VIRGO Collab- orations), GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Ob- served by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run, Phys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and VIRGO Collab- orations), GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Ob- served by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X11, 021053 (2021), arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    Accadiaet al.(VIRGO Collaboration), Virgo: A laser interferometer to detect gravitational waves, Journal of Instrumentation7, 3012

    T. Accadiaet al.(VIRGO Collaboration), Virgo: A laser interferometer to detect gravitational waves, Journal of Instrumentation7, 3012

  5. [5]

    Akutsuet al.(KAGRA Collaboration), Overview of KAGRA : KAGRA science, PTEP2021, 05A103 (2021), arXiv:2008.02921 [gr-qc]

    T. Akutsuet al.(KAGRA Collaboration), Overview of KAGRA : KAGRA science, PTEP2021, 05A103 (2021), arXiv:2008.02921 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    H. Xuet al.(CPTA Collaboration), Searching for the nano-Hertz stochastic gravitational wave background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics23, 075024 (2023), arXiv:2306.16216 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    G. Desvigneset al.(EPTA Collaboration), High- precision timing of 42 millisecond pulsars with the Euro- pean Pulsar Timing Array, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society458, 3341 (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    P. Tarafdaret al.(InPTA Collaboration), The Indian Pulsar Timing Array: First data release, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia39, e053 (2022), arXiv:2206.09289 [astro-ph.IM]

    arXiv 2022

  9. [9]

    Baileset al.(MeerTime Collaboration), MeerTime - the MeerKAT Key Science Program on Pulsar Timing (2018), arXiv:1803.07424 [astro-ph.IM]

    M. Baileset al.(MeerTime Collaboration), MeerTime - the MeerKAT Key Science Program on Pulsar Timing (2018), arXiv:1803.07424 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  10. [10]

    Brazieret al.(NANOGrav Collaboration), The NANOGrav Program for Gravitational Waves and Fun- damental Physics (2019), arXiv:1908.05356 [astro-ph]

    A. Brazieret al.(NANOGrav Collaboration), The NANOGrav Program for Gravitational Waves and Fun- damental Physics (2019), arXiv:1908.05356 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    Hobbs, The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array, Class

    G. Hobbs, The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array, Class. Quant. Grav.30, 224007 (2013), arXiv:1307.2629

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  12. [12]

    B. P. Abbottet al., A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant, Nature551, 85 (2017), arXiv:1710.05835 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  13. [13]

    G. Agazieet al.(NANOGrav Collaboration), The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background, The Astrophysical Journal Letters951, L8 (2023), arXiv:2306.16213 [astro- ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    A. Afzalet al.(NANOGrav Collaboration), The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics, The Astrophysical Journal Letters951, L11 (2023), arXiv:2306.16219 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KA- GRA Collaborations), Cosmological and High Energy Physics implications from gravitational-wave background searches in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA’s O1-O4a runs (2025), arXiv:2510.26848 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA Collaborations), GW241011 and GW241110: Exploring Binary Formation and Fundamental Physics with Asym- metric, High-spin Black Hole Coalescences, Astrophys. J. Lett.993, L21 (2025), arXiv:2510.26931 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KA- GRA Collaborations), Black Hole Spectroscopy and Tests of General Relativity with GW250114 (2025), arXiv:2509.08099 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Aggarwalet al., Challenges and Opportunities of Gravitational Wave Searches at MHz to GHz Fre- quencies, Living Reviews in Relativity24, 4 (2021), arXiv:2011.12414 [gr-qc]

    N. Aggarwalet al., Challenges and Opportunities of Gravitational Wave Searches at MHz to GHz Fre- quencies, Living Reviews in Relativity24, 4 (2021), arXiv:2011.12414 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Franciolini, A

    G. Franciolini, A. Maharana, and F. Muia, Hunt for Light Primordial Black Hole Dark Matter with Ultra- High-Frequency Gravitational Waves, Physical Review D 106, 103520 (2022), arXiv:2205.02153 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Gertsenshtein, Wave Resonance of Light and Gravita- tional Waves., Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics41, 113 (1961)

    M. Gertsenshtein, Wave Resonance of Light and Gravita- tional Waves., Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics41, 113 (1961)

    1961

  21. [21]

    Boccaletti, V

    D. Boccaletti, V. De Sabbata, P. Fortini, and C. Gualdi, Conversion of photons into gravitons and vice versa in a static electromagnetic field, Il Nuovo Cimento B (1965- 1970)70, 129 (1970)

    1965

  22. [22]

    Ya. B. Zel’dovich, Electromagnetic and gravitational waves in a stationary magnetic field, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics38, 652 (1974)

    1974

  23. [23]

    Sikivie, Experimental Tests of the Invisible Axion, Phys

    P. Sikivie, Experimental Tests of the Invisible Axion, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 1415 (1983)

    1983

  24. [24]

    Ringwald, J

    A. Ringwald, J. Sch¨ utte-Engel, and C. Tamarit, Grav- itational Waves as a Big Bang Thermometer, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2021(03), 054, arXiv:2011.04731 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2011

  25. [25]

    Berlin, D

    A. Berlin, D. Blas, R. T. D’Agnolo, S. A. R. El- lis, R. Harnik, Y. Kahn, and J. Sch¨ utte-Engel, De- tecting High-Frequency Gravitational Waves with Mi- crowave Cavities, Physical Review D105, 116011 (2022), arXiv:2112.11465 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Domcke, C

    V. Domcke, C. Garcia-Cely, and N. L. Rodd, A novel search for high-frequency gravitational waves with low- mass axion haloscopes, Physical Review Letters129, 041101 (2022), arXiv:2202.00695 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Domcke, C

    V. Domcke, C. Garcia-Cely, S. M. Lee, and N. L. Rodd, Symmetries and selection rules: Optimising axion halo- scopes for Gravitational Wave searches, JHEP03, 128, arXiv:2306.03125 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  28. [28]

    Capdevilla, R

    R. Capdevilla, R. Harnik, T. Kim, and T. Krokotsch, High-frequency gravitational wave detection by the BREAD experiment, Phys. Rev. D112, 035031 (2025), arXiv:2505.21628 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Schmieden and M

    K. Schmieden and M. Schott, The Global Network of Cavities to Search for Gravitational Waves (GravNet): A novel scheme to hunt gravitational waves signatures from the early universe (2023), arXiv:2308.11497 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Domcke and C

    V. Domcke and C. Garcia-Cely, Potential of radio telescopes as high-frequency gravitational wave detec- tors, Physical Review Letters126, 021104 (2021), arXiv:2006.01161 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    Gupta, P

    A. Gupta, P. Majumdar, S. Roy, and P. Sarkar, High-Frequency Gravitational Wave Constraints from Graviton-Photon Conversion in the M87 Galaxy (2026), arXiv:2604.01290 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    Berlin, D

    A. Berlin, D. Brzeminski, and E. H. Tanin, Narrowing Down Sources of High-Frequency Gravitational Waves (2026), arXiv:2601.10782 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    Bleau, J

    K. Bleau, J. Kopp, J. Lee, and J. van de Vis, High- Frequency Gravitational Waves from Phase Transitions in Nascent Neutron Stars (2026), arXiv:2603.18153 [hep- ph]

    arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    M. Amiriet al.(CHIME Collaboration), An Overview of CHIME, the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Ex- periment, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 261, 29 (2022), arXiv:2201.07869 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    Jianget al.(FAST Project), Commissioning Progress of the FAST (2019), arXiv:1903.06324 [astro-ph]

    P. Jianget al.(FAST Project), Commissioning Progress of the FAST (2019), arXiv:1903.06324 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    P. Jianget al.(FAST Project), The Fundamental Perfor- mance of FAST with 19-beam Receiver at L Band, Re- search in Astronomy and Astrophysics20, 064 (2020), arXiv:2002.01786 [astro-ph]. 7

    arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    L. Qian, R. Yao, J. Sun, J. Xu, Z. Pan, and P. Jiang (FAST Collaboration), FAST: Its Scientific Achieve- ments and Prospects, The Innovation1, 100053 (2020), arXiv:2011.13542 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    D. I. Dunsky, G. Krnjaic, and E. Pinetti, Observing Dark Matter Decays to Gravitons via Graviton-Photon Con- version (2025), arXiv:2503.19019 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    J. L. Burch, T. E. Moore, R. B. Torbert, and B. L. Giles, Magnetospheric Multiscale Overview and Science Objec- tives, Space Science Reviews199, 5 (2016)

    2016

  40. [40]

    W. Xu, R. A. Marshall, J. Bortnik, and J. W. Bon- nell, An Electron Density Model of the D- and E- Region Ionosphere for Transionospheric VLF Propaga- tion, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 126, e2021JA029288 (2021)

    2021

  41. [41]

    Angelopoulos, The ARTEMIS Mission, Space Science Reviews165, 3 (2011)

    V. Angelopoulos, The ARTEMIS Mission, Space Science Reviews165, 3 (2011)

    2011

  42. [42]

    D. G. Sibecket al., ARTEMIS Science Objectives, Space Science Reviews165, 59 (2011)

    2011

  43. [43]

    Runov, V

    A. Runov, V. Angelopoulos, K. Khurana, J. Liu, M. Ba- likhin, and A. V. Artemyev, Properties of Quiet Magne- totail Plasma Sheet at Lunar Distances, Journal of Geo- physical Research: Space Physics128, e2023JA031908 (2023)

    2023

  44. [44]

    Meng and K

    C.-I. Meng and K. A. Anderson, Magnetic field config- uration in the magnetotail near 60 RE, Journal of Geo- physical Research (1896-1977)79, 5143 (1974)

    1977

  45. [45]

    C. C. Finlayet al., International Geomagnetic Reference Field: The eleventh generation, Geophysical Journal In- ternational183, 1216 (2010)

    2010

  46. [46]

    D. A. Gurnett and W. S. Kurth, Plasma densities near and beyond the heliopause from the Voyager 1 and 2 plasma wave instruments, Nature Astronomy3, 1024 (2019)

    2019

  47. [47]

    Redfield and R

    S. Redfield and R. E. Falcon, The Structure of the Local Interstellar Medium. V. Electron Densities, The Astro- physical Journal683, 207 (2008)

    2008

  48. [48]

    L. F. Burlaga and N. F. Ness, Observations of the Inter- stellar Magnetic Field in the Outer Heliosheath: Voyager 1, The Astrophysical Journal829, 134 (2016)

    2016

  49. [49]

    D. L. Carpenter and R. R. Anderson, An ISEE/whistler model of equatorial electron density in the magneto- sphere, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 97, 1097 (1992)

    1992

  50. [50]

    J. E. Stawarz, J. P. Eastwood, T. D. Phan, I. L. Gin- gell, P. S. Pyakurel, M. A. Shay, S. L. Robertson, C. T. Russell, and O. Le Contel, Turbulence-driven magnetic reconnection and the magnetic correlation length: Obser- vations from Magnetospheric Multiscale in Earth’s mag- netosheath, Physics of Plasmas29, 012302 (2022)

    2022

  51. [51]

    M. L. Goldstein, J. P. Eastwood, R. A. Treumann, E. A. Lucek, J. Pickett, and P. D´ ecr´ eau, The Near-Earth Solar Wind, Space Science Reviews118, 7 (2005)

    2005

  52. [52]

    Fraternaleet al., Turbulence in the outer heliosphere, Space Science Reviews218, 50 (2022), arXiv:2207.14115

    F. Fraternaleet al., Turbulence in the outer heliosphere, Space Science Reviews218, 50 (2022), arXiv:2207.14115

    arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    Maggiore,Gravitational Waves

    M. Maggiore,Gravitational Waves. Volume 1, Theory and Experiments(University Press, Oxford, 2007)

    2007

  54. [54]

    Amiriet al.(CHIME/FRB Collaboration), The First CHIME/FRB Fast Radio Burst Catalog, The Astro- physical Journal Supplement Series257, 59 (2021), arXiv:2106.04352 [astro-ph]

    M. Amiriet al.(CHIME/FRB Collaboration), The First CHIME/FRB Fast Radio Burst Catalog, The Astro- physical Journal Supplement Series257, 59 (2021), arXiv:2106.04352 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  55. [55]

    A. L. Miller, N. Aggarwal, S. Clesse, and F. D. Lillo, Constraints on planetary and asteroid-mass primordial black holes from continuous gravitational-wave searches, Physical Review D105, 062008 (2022), arXiv:2110.06188 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  56. [56]

    A. L. Miller, N. Aggarwal, S. Clesse, F. D. Lillo, S. Sachdev, P. Astone, C. Palomba, O. J. Piccinni, and L. Pierini, Gravitational wave constraints on planetary- mass primordial black holes using LIGO O3a data, Physi- cal Review Letters133, 111401 (2024), arXiv:2402.19468 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  57. [57]

    Crisosto, G

    N. Crisosto, G. Rybka, P. Sikivie, N. S. Sullivan, D. B. Tanner, and J. Yang, ADMX SLIC: Results from a Super- conducting LC Circuit Investigating Cold Axions, Physi- cal Review Letters124, 241101 (2020), arXiv:1911.05772 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  58. [58]

    C. P. Salemiet al., Search for Low-Mass Axion Dark Matter with ABRACADABRA-10 cm, Physical Review Letters127, 081801 (2021), arXiv:2102.06722 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2021

  59. [59]

    A. S. Chouet al.(Holometer Collaboration), MHz grav- itational wave constraints with decameter Michelson in- terferometers, Physical Review D95, 063002 (2017), arXiv:1611.05560 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  60. [60]

    Domcke, S

    V. Domcke, S. A. R. Ellis, and N. L. Rodd, Magnets are Weber Bar Gravitational Wave Detectors, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 231401 (2025), arXiv:2408.01483 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    S. Hild, S. Chelkowski, and A. Freise, Pushing towards the ET sensitivity using ’conventional’ technology (2008), arXiv:0810.0604 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  62. [62]

    Punturoet al., The Einstein Telescope: A third- generation gravitational wave observatory, Class

    M. Punturoet al., The Einstein Telescope: A third- generation gravitational wave observatory, Class. Quant. Grav.27, 194002 (2010)

    2010

  63. [63]

    Hildet al., Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories, Class

    S. Hildet al., Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories, Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 094013 (2011), arXiv:1012.0908 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  64. [64]

    Berlin, D

    A. Berlin, D. Blas, R. T. D’Agnolo, S. A. R. Ellis, R. Harnik, Y. Kahn, J. Sch¨ utte-Engel, and M. Wentzel, MAGO$\,$2.0: Electromagnetic Cav- ities as Mechanical Bars for Gravitational Waves, https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.01518v1 (2023)

    arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    Gasparotto, G

    S. Gasparotto, G. Franciolini, and V. Domcke, Gravita- tional Wave Memory of Primordial Black Hole Mergers (2025), arXiv:2505.01356 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Arvanitaki and S

    A. Arvanitaki and S. Dubovsky, Exploring the string ax- iverse with precision black hole physics, Physical Review D83, 044026 (2011), arXiv:1004.3558 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  67. [67]

    Arvanitaki, M

    A. Arvanitaki, M. Baryakhtar, and X. Huang, Discov- ering the QCD Axion with Black Holes and Gravita- tional Waves, Physical Review D91, 084011 (2015), arXiv:1411.2263 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  68. [68]

    Arvanitaki, M

    A. Arvanitaki, M. Baryakhtar, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, and R. Lasenby, Black Hole Mergers and the QCD Axion at Advanced LIGO, Physical Review D95, 043001 (2017), arXiv:1604.03958 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  69. [69]

    Brito, V

    R. Brito, V. Cardoso, and P. Pani,Superradiance – the 2020 Edition, Vol. 971 (2020) arXiv:1501.06570 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  70. [70]

    Aggarwal, G

    N. Aggarwal, G. P. Winstone, M. Teo, M. Baryakhtar, S. L. Larson, V. Kalogera, and A. A. Geraci, Searching for new physics with a levitated-sensor-based gravitational- wave detector (2020), arXiv:2010.13157 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2020

  71. [71]

    V. D. Luca, V. Desjacques, G. Franciolini, A. Malhotra, and A. Riotto, The Initial Spin Probability Distribution of Primordial Black Holes, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2019(05), 018, arXiv:1903.01179 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 1903

  72. [72]

    Mandalet al., Extremely deep 150 MHz source counts from the LoTSS Deep Fields, Astronomy & Astrophysics 8 648, A5 (2021), arXiv:2011.08829 [astro-ph]

    S. Mandalet al., Extremely deep 150 MHz source counts from the LoTSS Deep Fields, Astronomy & Astrophysics 8 648, A5 (2021), arXiv:2011.08829 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  73. [73]

    T. W. Shimwellet al., The LOFAR Two-metre Sky Sur- vey: Deep Fields Data Release 2: I. The ELAIS-N1 field, Astronomy & Astrophysics695, A80 (2025)

    2025

  74. [74]

    M. Mutaleet al.(MeerKAT Collaboration), The SARAO MeerKAT Galactic Plane survey compact source cat- alogue, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society546, staf1849 (2026), arXiv:2510.23707 [astro- ph.GA]

    arXiv 2026

  75. [75]

    N. Hurley-Walkeret al., GaLactic and Extragalactic All- sky Murchison Widefield Array (GLEAM) survey I: A low-frequency extragalactic catalogue, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society464, 1146 (2017), arXiv:1610.08318 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  76. [76]

    K. Vanderlindeet al., The Canadian Hydrogen Observa- tory and Radio-transient Detector (CHORD), Canadian Long Range Plan for Astronomy and Astrophysics White Papers2020, 28 (2019), arXiv:1911.01777 [astro-ph.IM]

    arXiv 2019

  77. [77]

    Braun, A

    R. Braun, A. Bonaldi, T. Bourke, E. Keane, and J. Wagg, Anticipated Performance of the Square Kilometre Ar- ray – Phase 1 (SKA1) (2019), arXiv:1912.12699 [astro- ph.IM]

    arXiv 2019

  78. [78]

    Weltmanet al., Fundamental Physics with the Square Kilometre Array, Publications of the Astronomical Soci- ety of Australia37, e002 (2020), arXiv:1810.02680 [astro- ph]

    A. Weltmanet al., Fundamental Physics with the Square Kilometre Array, Publications of the Astronomical Soci- ety of Australia37, e002 (2020), arXiv:1810.02680 [astro- ph]

    arXiv 2020

  79. [79]

    C. R. Harriset al., Array programming with NumPy, Nature585, 357 (2020)

    2020

  80. [80]

    Virtanenet al., SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python, Nature Methods17, 261 (2020)

    P. Virtanenet al., SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python, Nature Methods17, 261 (2020)

    2020

Showing first 80 references.