pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.11579 · v1 · pith:N6CSL34Cnew · submitted 2026-06-10 · 🪐 quant-ph · cs.DC· physics.atm-clus· physics.atom-ph· physics.chem-ph

Tensor-Network-Based Distributed Quantum Dynamics on Independent Quantum Computers

Anurag Dwivedi , Melissa C. Revelle , Daniel S. Lobser , Brian K. McFarland , Edward C. Tortorici , Christopher G. Yale , Susan M. Clark , Philip Richerme
show 1 more author
Srinivasan S. Iyengar
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 09:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cs.DCphysics.atm-clusphysics.atom-phphysics.chem-ph
keywords tensor networksdistributed quantum computingquantum dynamicsvibrational spectratrapped-ion hardwarecontinuous-variable representationwavepacket propagationasynchronous execution
0
0 comments X

The pith

Tensor-network decomposition of the time-evolution operator splits entangled quantum dynamics into independent lower-dimensional propagations executable asynchronously on separate quantum computers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that representing the multidimensional time-evolution operator as a tensor network creates an elevated Hilbert space in which the original entangled dynamics factor into a collection of independent lower-dimensional propagations. These propagations become parallel computational tasks that run without mutual synchronization on any mixture of quantum and classical hardware. The approach is tested by compiling the resulting circuits to native partial-entangling gates on a trapped-ion processor and computing the vibrational spectrum of a protonated water cluster, which matches classical reference values to within 4 cm^{-1}. A reader would care because the method supplies a concrete route to distributed simulation of continuous-variable chemical systems on today's limited quantum devices.

Core claim

The tensor-network representation of the multidimensional time-evolution operator naturally induces an elevated Hilbert space where the dynamics decomposes into a set of independent lower-dimensional propagations. This transformation converts an entangled quantum evolution into a set of parallel computational tasks that can be executed asynchronously across heterogeneous quantum and classical computing architectures. The formalism links tensor-network decompositions to uniformly controlled quantum circuits and asynchronous distributed quantum computing. On trapped-ion hardware the circuits are realized with native partial-entangling XX( heta) gates, and the method yields vibrational spectra

What carries the argument

The tensor-network representation of the multidimensional time-evolution operator, which induces an elevated Hilbert space that factors the dynamics into independent lower-dimensional propagations.

Load-bearing premise

The tensor-network decomposition converts an entangled quantum evolution into parallel tasks executable asynchronously on independent machines without introducing approximation errors or synchronization overhead large enough to invalidate the reported spectral agreement.

What would settle it

A recomputation of the same protonated water cluster spectrum on a larger-scale exact simulator or on a single coherent quantum device that deviates from the distributed result by more than 4 cm^{-1} would falsify the claim that the decomposition preserves accuracy without significant overhead.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.11579 by Anurag Dwivedi, Brian K. McFarland, Christopher G. Yale, Daniel S. Lobser, Edward C. Tortorici, Melissa C. Revelle, Philip Richerme, Srinivasan S. Iyengar, Susan M. Clark.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The essence of the distributed algorithm [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Time evolution of a wavepacket in a tensor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: (a) Uniformly controlled gate-like structure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Block diagonal form of the overall unitary in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The circuit in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: (a) Uniformly controlled gate (UCG) representation of the block-diagonal operator shown in Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: The circuit in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Illustration of the phase estimation algo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Molecular structure of the H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: (a) Potential energy surface (PES) on 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Time-dependent populations of the propagated wavepacket projected onto individual grid basis states, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Frequency spectra obtained from the Fourier transform of the time-dependent wavepacket populations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Comparison between the vibrational transition [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: (a) Block diagonal form of the overall unitary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: The circuit in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: Three-qubit QSD decomposition grouped into [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17: Full gate sequence for subroutines [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18: Gate decomposition for multicontrolled three-qubit subroutines [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_18.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present an approach based on tensor networks for distributed quantum computing simulation of chemical wavepacket dynamics in a continuous variable representation. The central idea is that the tensor-network representation of the multidimensional time-evolution operator naturally induces an elevated Hilbert space where the dynamics decomposes into a set of independent lower-dimensional propagations. This transformation converts an entangled quantum evolution into a set of parallel computational tasks that can be executed asynchronously across heterogeneous quantum and classical computing architectures. The resulting formalism establishes a direct connection between tensor-network decompositions, uniformly controlled quantum circuits, and asynchronous distributed quantum computing. The approach is developed with a goal towards hybrid quantum/classical implementation, and is appropriate for a general heterogeneous mixture of quantum hardware systems. The experimental realization of the asynchronously distributed quantum processes that arise from the tensor-network decomposition are carried out on the Sandia National Laboratories' trapped-ion quantum computer, where the circuits are compiled using native partial-entangling $XX(\theta)$ gates, reducing the expected two-qubit gate infidelity by more than 30\% relative to conventional fully entangling decompositions. We demonstrate the methodology by quantum computing the vibrational spectra of a small protonated water cluster that shows critical quantum nuclear behavior. Such water cluster systems have been found to be challenging for experimental action spectroscopy and for theory, and here, for the first time, we provide results for vibrational spectroscopy that are in agreement with the respective classical results to within 4cm$^{-1}$, thus allowing for the potential for spectroscopic accuracy from quantum computations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a tensor-network-based formalism for distributed quantum simulation of chemical wavepacket dynamics in a continuous-variable representation. The central claim is that the tensor-network representation of the multidimensional time-evolution operator induces an elevated Hilbert space permitting an exact decomposition of the dynamics into independent lower-dimensional propagations that can be executed asynchronously across heterogeneous quantum and classical architectures. This is linked to uniformly controlled quantum circuits. The approach is experimentally implemented on Sandia’s trapped-ion hardware using native partial-entangling XX(θ) gates, which reportedly reduce two-qubit gate infidelity by more than 30% relative to fully entangling decompositions. The method is demonstrated by computing vibrational spectra of a protonated water cluster, reported to agree with classical results to within 4 cm^{-1}.

Significance. If the tensor-network decomposition is exact and incurs neither truncation nor synchronization overhead, the work would establish a concrete bridge between tensor-network methods, uniformly controlled circuits, and asynchronous distributed quantum computing, enabling hybrid implementations for molecular dynamics on heterogeneous hardware. The experimental use of native XX(θ) gates on trapped ions and the reported spectral accuracy for a challenging water-cluster system constitute concrete strengths that could be impactful if the exactness claim is substantiated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the tensor-network representation 'naturally induces an elevated Hilbert space where the dynamics decomposes into a set of independent lower-dimensional propagations' that can be executed asynchronously without significant approximation errors is load-bearing for the reported 4 cm^{-1} spectral agreement; the manuscript provides no derivation, explicit construction of the elevated space, or error analysis demonstrating that the decomposition is exact and free of the bond-dimension truncation or Trotter errors standard in tensor-network time evolution.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract / experimental realization paragraph: the trapped-ion demonstration uses native XX(θ) gates on a single device and shows circuit compilation, but does not report measurements of distribution overhead, synchronization costs, or asynchronous execution across independent quantum computers; without such controls the 4 cm^{-1} agreement cannot be attributed to the distributed tensor-network decomposition.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states a >30% reduction in expected two-qubit gate infidelity but does not identify the conventional fully entangling decomposition used as the baseline for comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating where we agree that revisions will strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the tensor-network representation 'naturally induces an elevated Hilbert space where the dynamics decomposes into a set of independent lower-dimensional propagations' that can be executed asynchronously without significant approximation errors is load-bearing for the reported 4 cm^{-1} spectral agreement; the manuscript provides no derivation, explicit construction of the elevated space, or error analysis demonstrating that the decomposition is exact and free of the bond-dimension truncation or Trotter errors standard in tensor-network time evolution.

    Authors: The explicit construction of the elevated Hilbert space induced by the tensor-network representation of the time-evolution operator, together with the exact decomposition into independent lower-dimensional propagations, is given in Section 3 of the main text. This section derives the mapping for the continuous-variable vibrational problem and shows that the structure avoids standard bond-dimension truncation. We agree that a consolidated error analysis would improve clarity and will add a dedicated subsection in the revised manuscript that includes a proof outline establishing exactness (no Trotter or truncation errors) for the reported dynamics. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract / experimental realization paragraph: the trapped-ion demonstration uses native XX(θ) gates on a single device and shows circuit compilation, but does not report measurements of distribution overhead, synchronization costs, or asynchronous execution across independent quantum computers; without such controls the 4 cm^{-1} agreement cannot be attributed to the distributed tensor-network decomposition.

    Authors: The experimental demonstration validates the circuit compilation and native-gate implementation of the decomposed propagations on the trapped-ion hardware. The 4 cm^{-1} spectral agreement is obtained from these quantum computations performed according to the tensor-network decomposition. We acknowledge that the current hardware run is on a single device and does not include direct measurements of distribution overhead or multi-device asynchronous execution. We will revise the experimental section and discussion to include estimated overheads for asynchronous distribution and to clarify how the single-device results support the broader distributed framework. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation connects tensor networks to distributed execution without reduction to inputs or self-citation chains.

full rationale

The paper presents the tensor-network representation of the time-evolution operator as naturally inducing an elevated Hilbert space for decomposition into independent propagations, framed as a connection between existing tensor-network concepts, uniformly controlled circuits, and asynchronous distributed computing. No equations or claims in the provided text reduce the central result to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation. The experimental validation against classical vibrational spectra (within 4 cm^{-1}) supplies an external benchmark independent of the formalism's internal construction. This is the expected self-contained case.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on the domain assumption that tensor networks induce a decomposable elevated Hilbert space for the dynamics; no free parameters or invented entities are identifiable from the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The tensor-network representation of the multidimensional time-evolution operator naturally induces an elevated Hilbert space where the dynamics decomposes into independent lower-dimensional propagations.
    This is the central transformation stated in the abstract that enables the distributed execution.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5852 in / 1217 out tokens · 25681 ms · 2026-06-27T09:53:21.712869+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

182 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and here, the computational basis corresponding to |q⟩are mapped onto a multi-dimensional grid basis rep- resentation to describe the quantum nuclear wavepacket. More details on the general map between the continuous representation|x⟩and discrete qubit computational basis representation for the nuclear dynamics problem treated here are presented in discus...

  2. [2]

    Simulating physics with comput- ers,

    Richard P. Feynman, “Simulating physics with comput- ers,”International Journal of Theoretical Physics, In- ternational Journal of Theoretical Physics21, 467–488 (1982)

    1982

  3. [3]

    Richard Phillips Feynman, JG Hey, and Robin W Allen, Feynman Lectures on Computation(Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.75 Arlington Street, Suite 300 Boston, MAUnited States, 1998)

    1998

  4. [4]

    R. P. Feynman and A. R. Hibbs,Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals(McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1965)

    1965

  5. [5]

    The multi-configurational time-dependent hartree ap- proach,

    H-D Meyer, U Manthe, and L S Cederbaum, “The multi-configurational time-dependent hartree ap- proach,” Chem. Phys. Lett.165, 73–78 (1990)

    1990

  6. [6]

    Wave- packet dynamics within the multiconfiguration hartree framework: General aspects and application to NOCl,

    U. Manthe, H. D. Meyer, and L. S. Cederbaum, “Wave- packet dynamics within the multiconfiguration hartree framework: General aspects and application to NOCl,” J. Chem. Phys.97, 3199–3213

  7. [7]

    The multiconfiguration time-dependent hartree (MCTDH) method: a highly efficient algorithm for propagating wavepackets,

    M H Beck, A J¨ ackle, G A Worth, and H-D Meyer, “The multiconfiguration time-dependent hartree (MCTDH) method: a highly efficient algorithm for propagating wavepackets,” Phys. Rep.324, 1–105 (2000)

    2000

  8. [8]

    17: Full gate sequence for subroutinesA 1,2 (top) andB 1,2 (bottom) used in the partial-angle QSD decomposi- tion

    Hans-Dieter Meyer, Fabien Gatti, and Graham A Worth,Multidimensional Quantum Dynamics: 22 Z(θ1) Y(θ3) Z(θ5) XX(θ7) X(θ8) Y(π2) XX(θ9) X(θ10) Y(−π2) Z(−π2) XX(θ11) X(θ12) Z(π2) Z(θ13) Y(θ15) Z(θ17) Z(θ2) Y(θ4) Z(θ6) Z(−π2) X(θ8) Z(π2) Y(π2) X(θ10) Y(−π2) X(θ12) Z(θ14) Y(θ16) Z(θ18) Z(θ1) Y(θ3) Z(θ5) Z(−π2) XX(θ7) X(θ8) Z(π2) Y(π2) XX(θ9) X(θ10) Y(−π2) XX(θ...

  9. [9]

    Y( π 2) XX12(θ4) X(θ5) Y(−π

  10. [10]

    Z(θ6) XX13(π 2) X(−π 2) Y( π

  11. [11]

    X(θ3) X(θ5) Y(−π 2) Y( π

  12. [12]

    X(π) Y(−π 2) Y(θ1) Z(−π 2) XX12(θ2) X(θ3) Z(π 2) XX13(π 2) X(−π

  13. [13]

    Z(−π 2) XX12(θ4) X(θ5) Z(π

  14. [14]

    Y(θ6) XX13(π 2) X(−π 2) Y(π

  15. [15]

    X(θ3) X(θ5) Y(−π 2) Y(π

  16. [16]

    18: Gate decomposition for multicontrolled three-qubit subroutinesM R z (top) andM R y (bottom)

    X(π) Y(−π 2) FIG. 18: Gate decomposition for multicontrolled three-qubit subroutinesM R z (top) andM R y (bottom). Each cir- cuit contains 6 adjustable anglesθ i used to specify the target multicontrolled unitary. MCTDH Theory and Applications(John Wiley & Sons, 2009)

    2009

  17. [17]

    Multilayer formula- tion of the multiconfiguration time-dependent hartree theory,

    Haobin Wang and Michael Thoss, “Multilayer formula- tion of the multiconfiguration time-dependent hartree theory,” J. Chem. Phys.119, 1289–1299 (2003)

    2003

  18. [18]

    First-principles quantum simulations of exciton diffusion on a minimal oligothiophene chain at finite temperature,

    Robert Binder and Irene Burghardt, “First-principles quantum simulations of exciton diffusion on a minimal oligothiophene chain at finite temperature,” Faraday Discuss.221, 406–427 (2020)

    2020

  19. [19]

    Multi-layer potfit: An accurate potential representation for efficient high-dimensional quantum dynamics,

    Frank Otto, “Multi-layer potfit: An accurate potential representation for efficient high-dimensional quantum dynamics,” J. Chem. Phys.140, 014106 (2014)

    2014

  20. [20]

    Adaptive dimensional decoupling for compression of quantum nu- clear wave functions and efficient potential energy sur- face representations through tensor network decomposi- tion,

    Nicole DeGregorio and Srinivasan S Iyengar, “Adaptive dimensional decoupling for compression of quantum nu- clear wave functions and efficient potential energy sur- face representations through tensor network decomposi- tion,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.15, 2780–2796 (2019)

    2019

  21. [21]

    Tensor-train split-operator fourier transform (tt-soft) method: Mul- tidimensional nonadiabatic quantum dynamics,

    Samuel M Greene and Victor S Batista, “Tensor-train split-operator fourier transform (tt-soft) method: Mul- tidimensional nonadiabatic quantum dynamics,” Jour- nal of chemical theory and computation13, 4034–4042 (2017)

    2017

  22. [22]

    Michael A Nielsen and Isaac L Chuang,Quantum com- putation and quantum information(Cambridge Univer- sity Press, Cambridge, New York, NY, 2000)

    2000

  23. [23]

    Quantum computing and the entangle- ment frontier,

    John Preskill, “Quantum computing and the entangle- ment frontier,” arXiv:1203.5813 [quant-ph] (2012)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  24. [24]

    Quantum computing 40 years later,

    John Preskill, “Quantum computing 40 years later,” (2021), arXiv:2106.10522 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    Juncheng (Harry) Zhang and Srinivasan S. Iyengar, “Graph-|Q⟩ ⟨C|: A graph-based quantum-classical algo- rithm for efficient electronic structure on hybrid quan- tum/classical hardware systems: Improved quantum circuit depth performance,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 18, 2885 (2022)

    2022

  26. [26]

    Graph-|Q⟩ ⟨C|: A quantum algorithm with reduced quantum circuit depth for electronic structure,

    Srinivasan S. Iyengar, Juncheng Harry Zhang, De- badrita Saha, and Timothy C. Ricard, “Graph-|Q⟩ ⟨C|: A quantum algorithm with reduced quantum circuit depth for electronic structure,” J. Phys. Chem. A127, 9334 (2023)

    2023

  27. [27]

    Two- qubit entangling gates for superconducting quantum computers,

    Muhammad AbuGhanem and Hichem Eleuch, “Two- qubit entangling gates for superconducting quantum computers,” Results in Physics56, 107236 (2024)

    2024

  28. [28]

    Limitations of noisy quantum devices in comput- ing and entangling power,

    Yuxuan Yan, Zhenyu Du, Junjie Chen, and Xiongfeng Ma, “Limitations of noisy quantum devices in comput- ing and entangling power,” npj Quantum Information 11, 188 (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    Does qubit connectivity impact quantum circuit com- plexity?

    Pei Yuan, Jonathan Allcock, and Shengyu Zhang, “Does qubit connectivity impact quantum circuit com- plexity?” IEEE Transactions on computer-aided design of integrated circuits and systems43, 520–533 (2023)

    2023

  30. [30]

    Quantum nuclear dynam- ics on a distributed set of ion-trap quantum computing systems,

    Anurag Dwivedi, A. J. Rasmussen, Philip Richerme, and Srinivasan S. Iyengar, “Quantum nuclear dynam- ics on a distributed set of ion-trap quantum computing systems,” J. Am. Chem. Soc.146, 29355–29363 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    Resource optimization for quan- tum dynamics with tensor networks: Quantum and 23 classical algorithms,

    Anurag Dwivedi, Miguel Angel Lopez-Ruiz, and Srini- vasan S. Iyengar, “Resource optimization for quan- tum dynamics with tensor networks: Quantum and 23 classical algorithms,” The Journal of Physical Chem- istry A128, 6774–6797 (2024), pMID: 39101545, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.4c03407

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.4c03407 2024

  32. [32]

    Quantum circuits with uni- formly controlled one-qubit gates,

    Ville Bergholm, Juha J Vartiainen, Mikko M¨ ott¨ onen, and Martti M Salomaa, “Quantum circuits with uni- formly controlled one-qubit gates,” Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics71, 052330 (2005)

    2005

  33. [33]

    Quantum multiplexer simplification for state preparation,

    Jos´ e Alex de Carvalho, Carlos Batista, Tiago de Veras, Israel Araujo, and Adenilton Jos´ e da Silva, “Quantum multiplexer simplification for state preparation,” ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing6, 1–12 (2025)

    2025

  34. [34]

    Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond,

    John Preskill, “Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond,” Quantum2, 79 (2018)

    2018

  35. [35]

    On the need for large quantum depth,

    Nai-Hui Chia, Kai-Min Chung, and Ching-Yi Lai, “On the need for large quantum depth,” inProceedings of the 52nd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2020 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2020) p. 902–915

    2020

  36. [36]

    Infrared signature of struc- tures associated with the H +(H2O)n (n = 6 to 27) clus- ters,

    J.-W. Shin, N. I. Hammer, E. G. Diken, M. A. John- son, R. S. Walters, T. D. Jaeger, M. A. Duncan, R. A. Christie, and K. D. Jordan, “Infrared signature of struc- tures associated with the H +(H2O)n (n = 6 to 27) clus- ters,” Science304, 1137 (2004)

    2004

  37. [37]

    Spectroscopic snap- shots of the proton-transfer mechanism in water,

    Conrad T. Wolke, Joseph A. Fournier, Laura C. Dzu- gan, Matias R. Fagiani, Tuguldur T. Odbadrakh, Harald Knorke, Kenneth D. Jordan, Anne B. McCoy, Knut R. Asmis, and Mark A. Johnson, “Spectroscopic snap- shots of the proton-transfer mechanism in water,” Sci- ence354, 1131 (2016)

    2016

  38. [38]

    Dynamics and infrared spectroscopy of the protonated water dimer,

    Oriol Vendrell, Fabien Gatti, and Hans-Dieter Meyer, “Dynamics and infrared spectroscopy of the protonated water dimer,” Ang. Chem. Intl. Ed.46, 6918 (2007)

    2007

  39. [39]

    Vendrell, F

    O. Vendrell, F. Gatti, and H.-D. Meyer, “Full dimen- sional (15d) quantum-dynamical simulation of the pro- tonated water-dimer ii: Infrared spectrum and vibra- tional dynamics dynamics and infrared spectroscopy of the protonated water dimer,” J. Chem. Phys.127, 184303 (2007)

    2007

  40. [40]

    Strong isotope effects in the infrared spectrum of the zundel cation,

    O. Vendrell, F. Gatti, and H.-D. Meyer, “Strong isotope effects in the infrared spectrum of the zundel cation,” Angew. Chem. Intl. Ed.48, 352 (2009)

    2009

  41. [41]

    Constructing periodic phase space orbits from ab initio molecular dynamics trajectories to analyze vibrational spectra: Case study of the zundel (H 5O+ 2 ) cation,

    S. M. Dietrick and S. S. Iyengar, “Constructing periodic phase space orbits from ab initio molecular dynamics trajectories to analyze vibrational spectra: Case study of the zundel (H 5O+ 2 ) cation,” J. Chem. Theory and Comput.8, 4876 (2012)

    2012

  42. [42]

    The properties of ion-water clusters. i. the protonated 21-water cluster,

    S. S. Iyengar, M. K. Petersen, T. J. F. Day, C. J. Burn- ham, V. E. Teige, and G. A. Voth, “The properties of ion-water clusters. i. the protonated 21-water cluster,” J. Chem. Phys.123, 084309 (2005)

    2005

  43. [43]

    Further analysis of the dynamically av- eraged vibrational spectrum for the “magic

    S. S. Iyengar, “Further analysis of the dynamically av- eraged vibrational spectrum for the “magic” protonated 21-water cluster,” J. Chem. Phys.126, 216101 (2007)

    2007

  44. [44]

    Gramicidin A channel as a test ground for molecular dynamics force fields,

    Toby W Allen, Turgut Ba¸ stu˘ g, Serdar Kuyucak, and Shin-Ho Chung, “Gramicidin A channel as a test ground for molecular dynamics force fields,” Biophys. J.84, 2159–2168 (2003)

    2003

  45. [45]

    Molecular mechanisms for proton transport in membranes,

    J. F. Nagle and H. J. Morowitz, “Molecular mechanisms for proton transport in membranes,” Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.75, 298– (1978)

    1978

  46. [46]

    Interruption of the water chain in the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides reduces the rates of the proton uptake and of the second electron transfer to QB,

    Laura Baciou and Hartmut Michel, “Interruption of the water chain in the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides reduces the rates of the proton uptake and of the second electron transfer to QB,” Biochemistry 34, 7967–7972 (1995)

    1995

  47. [47]

    Proton transfer in the hydrogen-bonded chains of lepidocrocite: a com- putational study,

    Haibo Guo and Amanda S Barnard, “Proton transfer in the hydrogen-bonded chains of lepidocrocite: a com- putational study,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.13, 17864 (2011)

    2011

  48. [48]

    Wa- ter soluble polymers as proton exchange membranes for fuel cells,

    Yun-Sheng Ye, John Rick, and Bing-Joe Hwang, “Wa- ter soluble polymers as proton exchange membranes for fuel cells,” Polymers4, 913–963 (2012)

    2012

  49. [49]

    On the depletion of antarctic ozone,

    S Solomon, R. R. Garcia, F. S. Rowland, and D. J. Wuebbles, “On the depletion of antarctic ozone,” Na- ture321, 755 (1986)

    1986

  50. [50]

    Chemistry of the upper and lower atmosphere: Theory, experiments, and applications,

    B. J. Finlayson-Pitts and J. N. Pitts, Jr., “Chemistry of the upper and lower atmosphere: Theory, experiments, and applications,” (Academic, San Diego, 2000)

    2000

  51. [51]

    Heterogeneous physicochemistry of the polar ozone hole,

    R. P. Turco, O. B. Toon, and P. Hamil, “Heterogeneous physicochemistry of the polar ozone hole,” Journal Of Geophysical Research94, 16493 (1989)

    1989

  52. [52]

    Stratospheric ozone depletion: A review of concepts and history,

    S. Solomon, “Stratospheric ozone depletion: A review of concepts and history,” Reviews of Geophysics37, 275 (1999)

    1999

  53. [53]

    Measurement of oh and ho 2 in the troposphere,

    Dwayne E. Heard and Michael J. Pilling, “Measurement of oh and ho 2 in the troposphere,” Chem. Revs.103, 5163 (2003)

    2003

  54. [54]

    Detailed modeling of the temperature and pressure dependence of the reaction h+o 2(+ m)→ ho2(+ m),

    J. Troe, “Detailed modeling of the temperature and pressure dependence of the reaction h+o 2(+ m)→ ho2(+ m),” Proceedings of the combustion institute28, 1463 (2000)

    2000

  55. [55]

    Tropospheric chemistry: A global perspec- tive,

    J. A. Logan, M. J. Prather, S. C. Wofsy, and M. B. McElroy, “Tropospheric chemistry: A global perspec- tive,” J. Geophys. Res.86, 7210 (1981)

    1981

  56. [56]

    Chemistry in the upper atmosphere,

    M. J. McEwan and L. F. Phillips, “Chemistry in the upper atmosphere,” Accounts of Chemical Research3, 9 (1970)

    1970

  57. [57]

    Ionic clusters,

    A. W. Castleman and R. G. Keesee, “Ionic clusters,” Chem. Rev.86, 589 (1986)

    1986

  58. [58]

    M. J. McEwan and L. F. Phillips,Chemistry of the At- mosphere(Eward Arnold:London, 1975)

    1975

  59. [60]

    Radical water complexes in earth’s atmosphere,

    J. S. Aloisio, S.; Francisco, “Radical water complexes in earth’s atmosphere,” Accounts of Chemical Research 33, 825 (2000)

    2000

  60. [61]

    The Mechanism of N 2 Reduction Catalyzed by Fe- Nitrogenase Involves Reductive Elimination of H2,

    D. F. Harris, D. A. Lukoyanov, S. Shaw, P. Comp- ton, M. Tokmina-Lukaszewska, B. Bothner, N. Kelle- her, D. R. Dean, B. M. Hoffman, and L. C. Seefeldt, “The Mechanism of N 2 Reduction Catalyzed by Fe- Nitrogenase Involves Reductive Elimination of H2,” Bio- chemistry57, 701–710 (2018)

    2018

  61. [62]

    Molybdenum en- zymes,

    R. N. F. Thorneley and D. J. Lowe, “Molybdenum en- zymes,” (Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1985) Chap. Kinetics and Mechanism of the Nitrogenase Enzymatic System, pp. 221–284

    1985

  62. [63]

    Reduction of dini- trogen to ammonia at a well-protected reaction site in a molybdenum triamidoamine complex,

    D. V. Yandulov and R. R. Schrock, “Reduction of dini- trogen to ammonia at a well-protected reaction site in a molybdenum triamidoamine complex,” J. Am. Chem. Soc.124, 6252 (2002)

    2002

  63. [64]

    The Grotthuss Mechanism,

    N. Agmon, “The Grotthuss Mechanism,” Chem. Phys. Lett.244, 456 (1995)

    1995

  64. [65]

    A practical introduction to tensor net- works: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states,

    Rom´ an Or´ us, “A practical introduction to tensor net- works: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states,” Ann. Physics349, 117 – 158 (2014)

    2014

  65. [66]

    Graph-theoretic molecular frag- 24 mentation for potential surfaces leads naturally to a ten- sor network form and allows accurate and efficient quan- tum nuclear dynamics,

    Anup Kumar, Nicole DeGregorio, Timothy Ricard, and Srinivasan S. Iyengar, “Graph-theoretic molecular frag- 24 mentation for potential surfaces leads naturally to a ten- sor network form and allows accurate and efficient quan- tum nuclear dynamics,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.18, 7243 (2022)

    2022

  66. [67]

    Out-of- equilibrium dynamics with matrix product states,

    Michael L Wall and Lincoln D Carr, “Out-of- equilibrium dynamics with matrix product states,” New Journal of Physics14, 125015 (2012)

    2012

  67. [68]

    Ma- trix product operator representations,

    B Pirvu, V Murg, J I Cirac, and F Verstraete, “Ma- trix product operator representations,” New Journal of Physics12, 025012 (2010)

    2010

  68. [69]

    An area law for one-dimensional quan- tum systems,

    M B Hastings, “An area law for one-dimensional quan- tum systems,” Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2007, P08024 (2007)

    2007

  69. [70]

    On the product of semi-groups of oper- ators,

    M. F. Trotter, “On the product of semi-groups of oper- ators,” Proc. Am. Math. Soc.10, 545 (1959)

    1959

  70. [71]

    Feynman integrals and the schr¨ odinger equation,

    E. Nelson, “Feynman integrals and the schr¨ odinger equation,” J. Math. Phys.5, 332 (1964)

    1964

  71. [72]

    Large language model-type architecture for high-dimensional molecu- lar potential energy surfaces,

    Xiao Zhu and Srinivasan S. Iyengar, “Large language model-type architecture for high-dimensional molecu- lar potential energy surfaces,” Phys. Rev. X16, 011012 (2026)

    2026

  72. [73]

    Quantum circuit and mapping algorithms for wavepacket dynamics: case study of anharmonic hy- drogen bonds in protonated and hydroxide water clus- ters,

    Debadrita Saha, Philip Richerme, and Srinivasan S Iyengar, “Quantum circuit and mapping algorithms for wavepacket dynamics: case study of anharmonic hy- drogen bonds in protonated and hydroxide water clus- ters,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation21, 3814–3831 (2025)

    2025

  73. [74]

    Re- alization and calibration of continuously parameterized two-qubit gates on a trapped-ion quantum processor,

    Christopher G Yale, Ashlyn D Burch, Matthew NH Chow, Brandon P Ruzic, Daniel S Lobser, Brian K Mc- Farland, Melissa C Revelle, and Susan M Clark, “Re- alization and calibration of continuously parameterized two-qubit gates on a trapped-ion quantum processor,” IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering (2025)

    2025

  74. [75]

    Phoenix and peregrine ion traps,

    Melissa C. Revelle, “Phoenix and peregrine ion traps,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.02398 (2020)

    arXiv 2009

  75. [76]

    Manipulation and detection of a trapped yb[sup +] hyperfine qubit,

    S. Olmschenk, K. C. Younge, D. L. Moehring, D. N. Matsukevich, P. Maunz, and C. Monroe, “Manipulation and detection of a trapped yb[sup +] hyperfine qubit,” Phys. Rev. A76, 052314 (2007)

    2007

  76. [77]

    Engineering the quantum scientific comput- ing open user testbed,

    Susan M. Clark, Daniel Lobser, Melissa C. Revelle, Christopher G. Yale, David Bossert, Ashlyn D. Burch, Matthew N. Chow, Craig W. Hogle, Megan Ivory, Jes- sica Pehr, Bradley Salzbrenner, Daniel Stick, William Sweatt, Joshua M. Wilson, Edward Winrow, and Peter Maunz, “Engineering the quantum scientific comput- ing open user testbed,” IEEE Transactions on Q...

    2021

  77. [78]

    Acousto optic solutions,

    L3 Harris, “Acousto optic solutions,” https://www.l3harris.com/all-capabilities/acousto- optic-solutions (2020)

    2020

  78. [79]

    High-performance gates on trapped ion qubits using counterpropagating pulse- shaped laser beams,

    Evangelos Piliouras, Hisham Amer, Susan M. Clark, Melissa C. Revelle, Edward C. Tortorici, Matthew N. H. Chow, Brandon Ruzic, Daniel S. Lobser, Brian K. Mc- Farland, Christopher G. Yale, Edwin Barnes, and Sophia E. Economou, “High-performance gates on trapped ion qubits using counterpropagating pulse- shaped laser beams,” (2026), manuscript in prepara- tion

    2026

  79. [80]

    An automated geometric space curve approach for designing dynamically corrected gates,

    Evangelos Piliouras, Dennis Lucarelli, and Edwin Barnes, “An automated geometric space curve approach for designing dynamically corrected gates,” npj Quan- tum Information12, 46 (2026)

    2026

  80. [81]

    Implementing and benchmark- ing dynamically corrected gates on superconducting devices using space curve quantum control,

    Hisham Amer, Evangelos Piliouras, Edwin Barnes, and Sophia E. Economou, “Implementing and benchmark- ing dynamically corrected gates on superconducting devices using space curve quantum control,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.09767 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.