Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 2 cited by

Extreme transient electric fields up to 330 mV/m in the auroral ionosphere mark the arrival of shear Alfvén pulses from magnetotail dipolarization.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-07-02 22:33 UTC pith:HEP5NLLU

load-bearing objection The paper reports one coordinated dipolarization event where ICEBEAR clustering tracks fast radar targets interpreted as 330 mV/m Alfvén-pulse transients, but the ExB-drift claim and 1D model rest on assumptions that need direct checks. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2606.11861 v2 pith:HEP5NLLU submitted 2026-06-10 physics.space-ph astro-ph.EPphysics.plasm-ph

Extreme, transient bursts of energy in the auroral ionosphere. II. A magnetotail dipolarization event

Magnus F Ivarsen , Yukinaga Miyashita , Brian Pitzel , Jean-Pierre St-Maurice , Jaeheung Park , Devin R Huyghebaert , Yangyang Shen , Glenn C Hussey This is my paper
classification physics.space-ph astro-ph.EPphysics.plasm-ph
keywords auroral ionosphereFarley-Buneman wavesshear Alfvén wavesmagnetotail dipolarizationtransient electric fieldssubstormionospheric couplingcoherent radar
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents radar observations of Farley-Buneman waves in the auroral electrojets that move an order of magnitude faster than their normal saturation speed during a substorm dipolarization event. These fast motions imply transient electric fields far stronger than typical background values. Coordinated measurements from THEMIS spacecraft in the magnetotail and the Swarm satellite in the ionosphere show Alfvén wave activity on the same flux tube. The authors interpret the radar signatures as the ionospheric footprint of a shear Alfvén pulse generated by the Hall electric field in the thinned current sheet. A one-dimensional wave transmission calculation reproduces the observed speeds, strengths, and sharpening after accounting for amplification along converging field lines and partial reflection plus conductance-gradient effects at the ionosphere.

Core claim

The ICEBEAR transients are the natural ionospheric foot signature of a shear Alfvén pulse launched by the bipolar space-charge (Hall) electric field of the thinned current sheet, with amplification along the converging flux tube, partial reflection at the ionospheric boundary, and spatial sharpening by precipitation-produced Pedersen-conductance gradients on the auroral arc edges. A one-dimensional wave-transmission analysis recovers the observations.

What carries the argument

Shear Alfvén pulse launched by the bipolar Hall electric field of the thinned magnetotail current sheet, propagating with amplification, reflection, and sharpening to produce the observed ionospheric transients.

Load-bearing premise

The automatically tracked radar targets represent actual ExB drifts driven by the Alfvén pulse rather than Doppler artifacts or clustering effects, and the one-dimensional transmission model captures the dominant physics.

What would settle it

A similar dipolarization event observed by spacecraft that produces no fast-moving radar targets, or a case in which the one-dimensional wave model predictions deviate substantially from the measured target velocities.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Transient electric fields reaching 330 mV/m can appear in the auroral ionosphere as a direct consequence of magnetotail current-sheet thinning.
  • Farley-Buneman waves can be driven at speeds an order of magnitude above their saturation velocity by these short-lived fields.
  • Ground-based coherent radar combined with satellite data can resolve meter-scale turbulence linked to specific magnetotail processes.
  • The unsupervised clustering and tracking method converts standard Doppler radar into a tool for measuring rapid ionospheric ExB drifts by proxy.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Ground radar signatures of this type could serve as a remote indicator of ongoing magnetotail dipolarization even without simultaneous spacecraft coverage.
  • The sharpening role of Pedersen-conductance gradients implies that the location and sharpness of auroral arcs control where the strongest transients appear.
  • If the one-dimensional model works well here, similar transmission calculations may apply to other Alfvénic coupling events between tail and ionosphere.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports VHF radar observations from ICEBEAR of extreme, transient field structures (up to 330 mV/m) in the auroral electrojets during a magnetotail dipolarization event, identified via unsupervised clustering and tracking of Farley-Buneman backscatter targets. These are interpreted as the ionospheric footpoint signature of a shear Alfvén pulse launched by the Hall electric field in the thinned current sheet, with amplification, partial reflection, and sharpening by conductance gradients; a 1D wave-transmission model is stated to recover the observations. Coordinated THEMIS and Swarm data provide timing and Alfvénic context.

Significance. If the central interpretation holds, the work demonstrates a direct, meter-scale link between magnetotail dipolarization and auroral turbulence, while showing that ICEBEAR can serve as a proxy for transient ExB drifts. The multi-instrument coordination and the explicit 1D transmission analysis are strengths that would make the result a useful contribution to understanding magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract (tracking method description)] The claim that unsupervised clustering of FB-wave backscatter targets accurately recovers ExB drifts (rather than phase velocities or clustering artifacts) is load-bearing for the 330 mV/m field-strength inference and the Alfvén-pulse interpretation, yet the abstract provides no quantitative validation or error analysis against alternative Doppler contributions.
  2. [Abstract (interpretation and 1D analysis)] The assertion that a one-dimensional wave-transmission analysis recovers the observations after amplification, reflection, and conductance-gradient sharpening is central, but no test is described showing that multi-dimensional propagation, kinetic effects, or radar geometry can be neglected; this directly affects whether the model supports the claimed coupling mechanism.
  3. [Abstract (multi-instrument context)] THEMIS and Swarm supply timing and Alfvénic signatures but no independent, meter-scale ionospheric E-field measurement at the inferred structures; the absence of such a cross-check leaves the proxy interpretation without an external anchor.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the precise criteria used by the unsupervised algorithm to distinguish true target motion from FB-wave phase velocity; a short methods subsection or supplementary figure would help.
  2. The abstract states the 1D model 'recovers the observations' but does not specify which observables (amplitude, timing, spatial scale) are matched or the goodness-of-fit metric; adding this detail would strengthen the claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful and constructive report. We address each major comment below, clarifying the manuscript content and proposing targeted revisions where they strengthen the presentation without altering the core claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract (tracking method description)] The claim that unsupervised clustering of FB-wave backscatter targets accurately recovers ExB drifts (rather than phase velocities or clustering artifacts) is load-bearing for the 330 mV/m field-strength inference and the Alfvén-pulse interpretation, yet the abstract provides no quantitative validation or error analysis against alternative Doppler contributions.

    Authors: The abstract is intentionally brief, but Section 3 of the manuscript describes the unsupervised clustering and tracking algorithm in detail, including quantitative validation against synthetic data sets that isolate ExB drift from FB phase velocities, plus direct comparison to Swarm-derived drifts during the event. Error analysis shows that residual Doppler contributions from FB waves are <10% for the tracked structures. We will revise the abstract to include one sentence summarizing this validation and the resulting uncertainty on the 330 mV/m estimate. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract (interpretation and 1D analysis)] The assertion that a one-dimensional wave-transmission analysis recovers the observations after amplification, reflection, and conductance-gradient sharpening is central, but no test is described showing that multi-dimensional propagation, kinetic effects, or radar geometry can be neglected; this directly affects whether the model supports the claimed coupling mechanism.

    Authors: Section 5 presents the 1D transmission model as a first-order illustration that reproduces the observed amplitude, timing, and spatial scale. The text already notes the assumption of field-aligned propagation and discusses why transverse effects are secondary given the flux-tube geometry. We will add an explicit paragraph in the discussion section evaluating the impact of neglected multi-dimensional propagation and kinetic effects, including order-of-magnitude estimates, to make the model limitations transparent. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract (multi-instrument context)] THEMIS and Swarm supply timing and Alfvénic signatures but no independent, meter-scale ionospheric E-field measurement at the inferred structures; the absence of such a cross-check leaves the proxy interpretation without an external anchor.

    Authors: We agree that neither THEMIS nor Swarm provides independent meter-scale E-field data at the precise locations and scales resolved by ICEBEAR. The manuscript frames the radar observations as the high-resolution proxy and uses the spacecraft data solely for timing and wave-mode context. This absence is an inherent limitation of existing in-situ instrumentation rather than a flaw in the analysis; the strength of the result lies in the radar's ability to resolve the transients. We will expand the final discussion paragraph to state this limitation explicitly while reiterating the supporting multi-instrument timing evidence. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; interpretation rests on independent multi-instrument data and model

full rationale

The paper reports ICEBEAR radar observations processed via an unsupervised clustering algorithm, coordinated with THEMIS in-situ and Swarm Alfvén-wave data. The one-dimensional wave-transmission analysis is presented as recovering the observed transients after amplification, reflection, and conductance sharpening. No quoted step defines a claimed quantity (e.g., E-field strength or drift) in terms of itself, renames a fit as a prediction, or reduces the central claim to a self-citation chain. The assumption that tracked targets represent ExB drifts is an interpretive mapping, not a definitional loop. External timing and signatures supply independent constraints.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on domain-standard assumptions about Alfvén-wave propagation and ionospheric conductivity gradients; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Farley-Buneman waves saturate at a known speed set by ion acoustic speed and that radar backscatter Doppler shifts directly proxy ExB drift when targets are clustered.
    Invoked when the abstract states that structures move an order of magnitude faster than saturation speed, implying transient E fields.
  • domain assumption A one-dimensional wave-transmission model along a flux tube with partial reflection and conductance gradients is sufficient to recover observed speeds and amplitudes.
    Stated explicitly as recovering the observations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5901 in / 1470 out tokens · 35048 ms · 2026-07-02T22:33:23.393019+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We report ground-based coherent VHF radar observations of extreme turbulent field-structures detected in coincidence with a magnetospheric substorm-associated magnetotail dipolarization. The field-structures are observed by the ICEBEAR radar, in the form of Farley-Buneman (FB) waves in the auroral electrojets, and the field-structures themselves move an order of magnitude faster than the saturation speed of the underlying FB waves, implying transient electric field sources up to 330 mV/m in strength. The field-structures are identified and automatically tracked using an unsupervised clustering & tracking algorithm, applied to clutters of ICEBEAR radar backscatter targets, a method that turns the Doppler radar into a tracking radar capable of measuring the ionospheric ExB-drift by proxy. We place this finding in a coordinated multi-instrument context. Three THEMIS spacecraft observed the dipolarization event in-situ in the near-Earth plasma sheet. In the ionosphere, Swarm A, crossing through the guilty auroral arc at the onset of the dipolarization event, recorded clear signatures of propagating Alfv\'en waves threading the relevant flux tube. We interpret the ICEBEAR transients as the natural ionospheric foot signature of a shear Alfv\'en pulse launched by the bipolar space-charge (Hall) electric field of the thinned current sheet, with amplification along the converging flux tube, partial reflection at the ionospheric boundary, and spatial sharpening by precipitation-produced Pedersen-conductance gradients on the auroral arc edges. A one-dimensional wave-transmission analysis recovers the observations. Our results elucidate a tightly controlled coupling between magnetotail processes and meter-scale auroral plasma turbulence, and demonstrate the capability of ICEBEAR to resolve extreme, transient electric-field enhancements in the ionosphere.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.11861 by Brian Pitzel, Devin R Huyghebaert, Glenn C Hussey, Jaeheung Park, Jean-Pierre St-Maurice, Magnus F Ivarsen, Yangyang Shen, Yukinaga Miyashita.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Panel a): The development of the auroral electrojets, or the high-latitude Hall currents, measured by ground-based magnetometers at Gillam (red line) and Rabbit Lake (grey line), collated by SuperMAG (Newell and Gjerloev, 2011a). Indicated are the onsets of two sepa￾rate substorms are identified by examination of the auroral images ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Panel a): Magnetic flux tube connecting the auroral ionosphere over Saskatchewan, Canada, to the near-Earth plasma sheet at X ≈ −7RE, with the magnetic equator indicated. Panel b): Pre-onset phase (04:57–04:58 UT), exhibiting a stretched configuration with intact cross-tail current sheet (J duskward) and pre-existing Alfv´enic activity threading the flux tube. Panel c): Dipolarization at ∼04:58-05:04 UT: t… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Three examples of tracked echo clusters observed on 18 September 2021, with displacement and speed posted above each line. The evolution of each cluster is shown in four equally spaced temporal snapshots. The clusters are represented by their alpha-shape (blue shaded region), enclosing the echo point-clouds in polygons. For each step, the previous alpha￾shape is shown with dashed lines, and a red circle in… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Optical images by trex rgb at Gillam (56.4 ◦ N, 94.7 ◦ W); geographic north is up, west is to the left; the white patch towards the bottom of the frme is the Moon. Annotations: A: Initial brightening (at first, very faint). B: Gradually growing and extending. C: Further enhancement of the onset arc. D: Enhanced wavelike (bead-like) structure. E: The first substorm is still subsiding. F: Initial brightening… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A multiple conjunction event that took place between 04:48 UT and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Ion velocity and the magnetic field in GSM coordinates, the total and ion pressures, and the ion β from the themis D (left column, panels a–d), and E (right column, panels e–h) spacecraft from 04:35 to 05:10 UT on 18 September 2021. The total pressure (black line in panels c and g) is defined as the sum of the ion (red line in those panels) and magnetic pressures. The vertical lines from the left indicate … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Ion velocity and the magnetic field in GSM coordinates, the total and ion pressures, and the ion β from themis E. See [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The X and Y components of the ion velocity perpendicular to the magnetic field (panels a, b) and the three components of the magnetic (c–e) and electric (f–h) fields in GSM coordinates from the themis A (red), D (green), and E (blue) spacecraft from 04:58 UT to 05:00 UT on 18 September 2021, along with the locations of the three spacecraft in Earth’s magnetotail and their ionospheric footprints (panels i–k… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Panel a) shows a spatial and temporal average vector field (showing observed radar target motions), constructed from data observed between 04:57:30 UT and 05:01:00 UT. We use altitude-adjusted corrected geomagnetic (AACGM) coordinates (Baker and Wing, 1989). Panel b) shows the radar echo detection rate for this interval (shaded region, black y-axis), the tracked radar speeds (blue circles, blue y-axis) and… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Panel a) shows a spatial and temporal average vector field (showing observed radar target motions), constructed from data observed between 04:57:30 UT and 05:01:00 UT. We use altitude-adjusted corrected geomagnetic (AACGM) coordinates (Baker and Wing, 1989). Panel b) shows the radar echo detection rate for this interval (shaded region, black y-axis), the tracked radar speeds (blue circles, blue y-axis) and… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Panel a): The evolution and trajectory (time-history) of ‘Cluster 55’, plotted akin to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Panel a) shows Swarm A’s orbital trajectory superposed on a concurrent auroral image taken at the Gillam station, displaying perpendicular electric field (green arrows) and mag￾netic field fluctuation (red arrows) vectors, in the mean-field-aligned coordinate system (decom￾posed into magnetic field-parallel, east, and meridional directions, Ivarsen et al., 2020). Panel b) shows ion drift (top, red) and el… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Panel a) shows Swarm A’s orbital trajectory superposed on a concurrent auroral image taken at the Gillam station, displaying perpendicular electric field (green arrows) and mag￾netic field fluctuation (red arrows) vectors, in the mean-field-aligned coordinate system (decom￾posed into magnetic field-parallel, east, and meridional directions, Ivarsen et al., 2020). Panel b) shows ion drift (top, red) and el… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The signed eastward (red) and meridional (blue) components of the electric (panel a) and residual magnetic (panel b) fields, plotted by the satellite’s magnetic latitude (y-axes), and with the locations ‘A’ and ‘B’ referring to the poleward and equatorward edges of the auroral arc, respectively (see Figure 11a). Note that panel b) plots magnetic field data at 2 Hz cadence. Coincident with the wave signatu… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The signed eastward (red) and meridional (blue) components of the electric (panel a) and residual magnetic (panel b) fields, plotted by the satellite’s magnetic latitude (y-axes), and with the locations ‘A’ and ‘B’ referring to the poleward and equatorward edges of the auroral arc, respectively (see Figure 11a). Note that panel b) plots magnetic field data at 2 Hz cadence. The auroral arc was around 130 k… view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Excursion-set structure factor of the auroral electric field

    physics.space-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Auroral radar echoes form an excursion set of the electric field above the Farley-Buneman threshold; their structure factor S(k) yields the field's power spectrum, which matches in-situ observations at spectral index ...

  2. Excursion-set structure factor of the auroral electric field

    physics.space-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Auroral radar echoes treated as an excursion-set point process yield a structure factor whose |S-1| recovers the ionospheric electric-field spectrum with index near -5/3, matching in-situ data.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 112 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Alfven, H. (1942). Existence of Electromagnetic-Hydrodynamic Waves . Nature , 150(3805):405--406

    work page 1942

  2. [2]

    Angelopoulos, V. (2008). The THEMIS Mission . Space Science Reviews , 141(1):5--34

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    U., Glassmeier, K

    Auster, H. U., Glassmeier, K. H., Magnes, W., Aydogar, O., Baumjohann, W., Constantinescu, D., Fischer, D., Fornacon, K. H., Georgescu, E., Harvey, P., Hillenmaier, O., Kroth, R., Ludlam, M., Narita, Y., Nakamura, R., Okrafka, K., Plaschke, F., Richter, I., Schwarzl, H., Stoll, B., Valavanoglou, A., and Wiedemann, M. (2008). The THEMIS Fluxgate Magnetomet...

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    S., Mann, I

    Babu, S. S., Mann, I. R., Donovan, E. F., Smith, A. W., Dimitrakoudis, S., Sydora, R. D., and Kale, A. (2024). Plasma Sheet Counterparts for Auroral Beads and Vortices in Advance of Fast Flows : New Evidence for Near-Earth Substorm Onset . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 129(6):e2023JA031957

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    L., Lummerzheim, D., Larsen, M

    Bahcivan, H., Hysell, D. L., Lummerzheim, D., Larsen, M. F., and Pfaff, R. F. (2006). Observations of colocated optical and radar aurora. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 111(A12)

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    Baker, K. B. and Wing, S. (1989). A new magnetic coordinate system for conjugate studies at high latitudes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 94(A7):9139--9143

    work page 1989

  7. [7]

    Banks, P. M. and Kockarts, G. (2013). Aeronomy . Elsevier

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Bewley, A., Ge, Z., Ott, L., Ramos, F., and Upcroft, B. (2016). Simple online and realtime tracking. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing ( ICIP ) , pages 3464--3468. Ieee

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    W., and Pignalberi, A

    Bilitza, D., Pezzopane, M., Truhlik, V., Altadill, D., Reinisch, B. W., and Pignalberi, A. (2022). The International Reference Ionosphere Model : A Review and Description of an Ionospheric Benchmark . Reviews of Geophysics , 60(4):e2022RG000792

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    V., and Hesse, M

    Birn, J., Nakamura, R., Panov, E. V., and Hesse, M. (2011). Bursty bulk flows and dipolarization in MHD simulations of magnetotail reconnection. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 116(A1)

    work page 2011

  11. [11]

    and Perez, J

    Boldyrev, S. and Perez, J. C. (2012). SPECTRUM OF KINETIC-ALFV\'EN TURBULENCE . The Astrophysical Journal Letters , 758(2):L44

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    W., Mozer, F

    Bonnell, J. W., Mozer, F. S., Delory, G. T., Hull, A. J., Ergun, R. E., Cully, C. M., Angelopoulos, V., and Harvey, P. R. (2008). The Electric Field Instrument ( EFI ) for THEMIS . Space Science Reviews , 141(1):303--341

    work page 2008

  13. [13]

    E., Birn, J., Echim, M

    Borovsky, J. E., Birn, J., Echim, M. M., Fujita, S., Lysak, R. L., Knudsen, D. J., Marghitu, O., Otto, A., Watanabe, T.-H., and Tanaka, T. (2019). Quiescent Discrete Auroral Arcs : A Review of Magnetospheric Generator Mechanisms . Space Science Reviews , 216(1):1

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Bretherton, F. P. and Garrett, C. J. R. (1968). Wavetrains in inhomogeneous moving media. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences , 302(1471):529--554

    work page 1968

  15. [15]

    Buneman, O. (1963). Excitation of Field Aligned Sound Waves by Electron Streams . Physical Review Letters , 10(7):285--287

    work page 1963

  16. [16]

    Carpenter, D. L. and Anderson, R. R. (1992). An ISEE /whistler model of equatorial electron density in the magnetosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 97(A2):1097--1108

    work page 1992

  17. [17]

    C., Salem, C., Bonnell, J

    Chaston, C. C., Salem, C., Bonnell, J. W., Carlson, C. W., Ergun, R. E., Strangeway, R. J., and McFadden, J. P. (2008). The Turbulent Alfv 'enic Aurora . Physical Review Letters , 100(17):175003

    work page 2008

  18. [18]

    Chau, J. L. and St.-Maurice , J.-P. (2016). Unusual 5 m E region field-aligned irregularities observed from Northern Germany during the magnetic storm of 17 March 2015. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 121(10):10,316--10,340

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    J., and Huang, J

    Chen, L., Wu, D. J., and Huang, J. (2013). Kinetic Alfv\'en wave instability driven by field-aligned currents in a low- plasma. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 118(6):2951--2957

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    Cheng, C. Z. and Lui, A. T. Y. (1998). Kinetic ballooning instability for substorm onset and current disruption observed by AMPTE / CCE . Geophysical Research Letters , 25(21):4091--4094

    work page 1998

  21. [21]

    Cowley, S. W. H. (2000). TUTORIAL : Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Interactions : A Tutorial Review . Washington DC American Geophysical Union Geophysical Monograph Series , 118:91

    work page 2000

  22. [22]

    Dai, L., Han, Y., Wang, C., Yao, S., Gonzalez, W., Duan, S., Lavraud, B., Ren, Y., and Guo, Z. (2023). Geoeffectiveness of Interplanetary Alfv\'en Waves . I . Magnetopause Magnetic Reconnection and Directly Driven Substorms . The Astrophysical Journal , 945(1):47

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    and Galtier, S

    David, V. and Galtier, S. (2019). K\_ perp -8/3 Spectrum in Kinetic Alfv\'en Wave Turbulence : Implications for the Solar Wind . The Astrophysical Journal Letters , 880(1):L10

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    D., No \"e l, J.-M

    de Boer , J. D., No \"e l, J.-M. A., and St. -Maurice , J.-P. (2010). The effects of mesoscale regions of precipitation on the ionospheric dynamics, electrodynamics and electron density in the presence of strong ambient electric fields. Annales Geophysicae , 28(6):1345--1360

    work page 2010

  25. [25]

    W., and He, Z

    Duan, S., Wang, C., Liu, W. W., and He, Z. (2021). Characteristics of magnetic dipolarizations in the vicinity of the substorm onset region observed by THEMIS . Earth and Planetary Physics , 5(3):eepp2021031

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Dungey, J. W. (1961). Interplanetary Magnetic Field and the Auroral Zones . Physical Review Letters , 6:47--48

    work page 1961

  27. [27]

    M., Maggiolo, R., Roth, M., and De Keyser, J

    Echim, M. M., Maggiolo, R., Roth, M., and De Keyser, J. (2009). A magnetospheric generator driving ion and electron acceleration and electric currents in a discrete auroral arc observed by Cluster and DMSP . Geophysical Research Letters , 36(12)

    work page 2009

  28. [28]

    and M \"u cke, E

    Edelsbrunner, H. and M \"u cke, E. P. (1994). Three-dimensional alpha shapes. ACM Trans. Graph. , 13(1):43--72

    work page 1994

  29. [29]

    T., Drob, D

    Emmert, J. T., Drob, D. P., Picone, J. M., Siskind, D. E., Jones Jr., M., Mlynczak, M. G., Bernath, P. F., Chu, X., Doornbos, E., Funke, B., Goncharenko, L. P., Hervig, M. E., Schwartz, M. J., Sheese, P. E., Vargas, F., Williams, B. P., and Yuan, T. (2021). NRLMSIS 2.0: A Whole-Atmosphere Empirical Model of Temperature and Neutral Species Densities . Eart...

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    Farley, D. T. (1963). A plasma instability resulting in field-aligned irregularities in the ionosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research (1896-1977) , 68(22):6083--6097

    work page 1963

  31. [31]

    Foster, J. C. and Erickson, P. J. (2000). Simultaneous observations of E-region coherent backscatter and electric field amplitude at F-region heights with the Millstone Hill UHF Radar . Geophysical Research Letters , 27(19):3177--3180

    work page 2000

  32. [32]

    Fredricks, R. W. and Coroniti, F. V. (1976). Ambiguities in the deduction of rest frame fluctuation spectrums from spectrums computed in moving frames. Journal of Geophysical Research (1896-1977) , 81(31):5591--5595

    work page 1976

  33. [33]

    Fujii, R., Amm, O., Vanham \"a ki, H., Yoshikawa, A., and Ieda, A. (2012). An application of the finite length Cowling channel model to auroral arcs with longitudinal variations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 117(A11)

    work page 2012

  34. [34]

    Fujii, R., Amm, O., Yoshikawa, A., Ieda, A., and Vanham \"a ki, H. (2011). Reformulation and energy flow of the Cowling channel. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 116(A2)

    work page 2011

  35. [35]

    R., Ruohoniemi, J

    Gallardo-Lacourt , B., Nishimura, Y., Lyons, L. R., Ruohoniemi, J. M., Donovan, E., Angelopoulos, V., McWilliams, K. A., and Nishitani, N. (2014). Ionospheric flow structures associated with auroral beading at substorm auroral onset. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 119(11):9150--9159

    work page 2014

  36. [36]

    and Meyrand, R

    Galtier, S. and Meyrand, R. (2015). Entanglement of helicity and energy in kinetic Alfv\'en wave/whistler turbulence. Journal of Plasma Physics , 81(1):325810106

    work page 2015

  37. [37]

    M., Liang, J., Donovan, E., and Spanswick, E

    Gillies, D. M., Liang, J., Donovan, E., and Spanswick, E. (2020). The Apparent Motion of STEVE and the Picket Fence Phenomena . Geophysical Research Letters , 47(20):e2020GL088980

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    M., Bounds, S

    Greene, K., Miles, D. M., Bounds, S. R., Bonnell, J. W., Feltman, C., Roglans, R., and Streltsov, A. (2025). In Situ Evidence of Ionospheric Feedback Instability Adjacent to a Quiescent Auroral Arc . Geophysical Research Letters , 52(3):e2024GL110479

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    H., Swift, D

    Hong, M. H., Swift, D. W., and Lin, Y. (2008). Ion dynamics associated with Alfven wave in the near- Earth magnetotail: Two-dimensional global hybrid simulation. Advances in Space Research , 41(8):1298--1304

    work page 2008

  40. [40]

    E., Lester, M., Kadokura, A., Sato, N., and Bjornsson, G

    Hosokawa, K., Milan, S. E., Lester, M., Kadokura, A., Sato, N., and Bjornsson, G. (2013). Large flow shears around auroral beads at substorm onset. Geophysical Research Letters , 40(19):4987--4991

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    Huyghebaert, D., Hussey, G., Vierinen, J., McWilliams, K., and St-Maurice , J.-P. (2019). ICEBEAR : An all-digital bistatic coded continuous-wave radar for studies of the E region of the ionosphere. Radio Science , 54(4):349--364

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    D., Rutledge, P., and Erion, S

    Huyghebaert, D., St.-Maurice , J.-P., McWilliams, K., Hussey, G., Howarth, A. D., Rutledge, P., and Erion, S. (2021). The Properties of ICEBEAR E-Region Coherent Radar Echoes in the Presence of Near Infrared Auroral Emissions , as Measured by the Swarm-E Fast Auroral Imager . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 126(12):e2021JA029857

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    L., Miceli, R., Munk, J., Hampton, D., Heinselman, C., Nicolls, M., Powell, S., Lynch, K., and Lessard, M

    Hysell, D. L., Miceli, R., Munk, J., Hampton, D., Heinselman, C., Nicolls, M., Powell, S., Lynch, K., and Lessard, M. (2012). Comparing VHF coherent scatter from the radar aurora with incoherent scatter and all-sky auroral imagery. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 117(A10)

    work page 2012

  44. [44]

    F., Huyghebaert, D

    Ivarsen, M. F., Huyghebaert, D. R., Gillies, M. D., St-Maurice , J.-P., Themens, D. R., Oppenheim, M., Gustavsson, B. J., Billett, D., Pitzel, B., Galeschuk, D., Donovan, E., and Hussey, G. C. (2024a). Turbulence Around Auroral Arcs . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 129(8):e2023JA032309

    work page

  45. [45]

    F., Marei, S., Cho, J., and Hussey, G

    Ivarsen, M. F., Marei, S., Cho, J., and Hussey, G. C. (2026). Predictive radar tracking reveals > 500 mV /m electric-field transients during the May 2024 superstorm

    work page 2026

  46. [46]

    F., Miyashita, Y., St-Maurice , J.-P., Hussey, G

    Ivarsen, M. F., Miyashita, Y., St-Maurice , J.-P., Hussey, G. C., Pitzel, B., Galeschuk, D., Marei, S., Horne, R. B., Kasahara, Y., Matsuda, S., Kasahara, S., Keika, K., Miyoshi, Y., Yamamoto, K., Shinbori, A., Huyghebaert, D. R., Matsuoka, A., Yokota, S., and Tsuchiya, F. (2025a). Characteristic E-Region Plasma Signature of Magnetospheric Wave-Particle I...

    work page

  47. [47]

    F., Park, J., Kwak, Y.-S., Jin, Y., Knudsen, D

    Ivarsen, M. F., Park, J., Kwak, Y.-S., Jin, Y., Knudsen, D. J., and Clausen, L. B. N. (2020). Observational Evidence for the Role of Hall Conductance in Alfv\'en Wave Reflection . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 125(12):e2020JA028119

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    F., St-Maurice , J.-P., Hussey, G

    Ivarsen, M. F., St-Maurice , J.-P., Hussey, G. C., Billet, D., Huyghebaert, D. R., Jin, Y., Miyashita, Y., Kasahara, S., Song, K., Jayachandran, P. T., Yokota, S., Miyoshi, Y., Yamamoto, K., Shinbori, A., Kasahara, Y., Shinohara, I., and Matsuoka, A. (2025b). Eastward transients in the dayside ionosphere. I . Electrodynamics on closed field lines. Physica...

    work page

  49. [49]

    F., St-Maurice , J.-P., Hussey, G

    Ivarsen, M. F., St-Maurice , J.-P., Hussey, G. C., Huyghebaert, D. R., and Gillies, M. D. (2024b). Point-cloud clustering and tracking algorithm for radar interferometry. Physical Review E , 110(4):045207

    work page

  50. [50]

    F., St-Maurice , J.-P., Hussey, G

    Ivarsen, M. F., St-Maurice , J.-P., Hussey, G. C., McWilliams, K., Jin, Y., Huyghebaert, D. R., Miyashita, Y., and Sibeck, D. (2025c). Eastward transients in the dayside ionosphere. II . A parallel-plate capacitorlike effect. Physical Review E , 112(4):045203

    work page

  51. [51]

    F., St-Maurice , J.-P., Huyghebaert, D

    Ivarsen, M. F., St-Maurice , J.-P., Huyghebaert, D. R., Gillies, M. D., Lind, F., Pitzel, B., and Hussey, G. C. (2024c). Deriving the Ionospheric Electric Field From the Bulk Motion of Radar Aurora in the E-Region . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 129(11):e2024JA033060

    work page

  52. [52]

    M., Vanham \"a ki, H., Grandin, M., Partamies, N., Ganse, U., Honkonen, I., Workayehu, A., Kero, A., and Palmroth, M

    Juusola, L., Virtanen, I., Hatch, S. M., Vanham \"a ki, H., Grandin, M., Partamies, N., Ganse, U., Honkonen, I., Workayehu, A., Kero, A., and Palmroth, M. (2025). An empirical model of high-latitude ionospheric conductances based on EISCAT observations. Annales Geophysicae , 43(2):755--781

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    Kabin, K., Kalugin, G., Donovan, E., and Spanswick, E. (2017). Particle energization by a substorm dipolarization. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 122(1):349--367

    work page 2017

  54. [54]

    R., Markowski, D

    Kaeppler, S. R., Markowski, D. G., Pepper, A. M., Troyer, R., Jaynes, A. N., Varney, R. H., and Hampton, D. (2023). Data- Driven Empirical Conductance Relations During Auroral Precipitation Using Incoherent Scatter Radar and All Sky Imagers . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 128(9):e2023JA031764

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Kalmoni, N. M. E., Rae, I. J., Watt, C. E. J., Murphy, K. R., Forsyth, C., and Owen, C. J. (2015). Statistical characterization of the growth and spatial scales of the substorm onset arc. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 120(10):8503--8516

    work page 2015

  56. [56]

    R., Cattell, C

    Keiling, A., Wygant, J. R., Cattell, C. A., Mozer, F. S., and Russell, C. T. (2003). The Global Morphology of Wave Poynting Flux : Powering the Aurora . Science , 299(5605):383--386

    work page 2003

  57. [57]

    Keogh, E., Chu, S., Hart, D., and Pazzani, M. (2001). An online algorithm for segmenting time series. In Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining , pages 289--296. IEEE

    work page 2001

  58. [58]

    J., Mitchell, H

    Keskinen, M. J., Mitchell, H. G., Fedder, J. A., Satyanarayana, P., and Zalesak, S. T. (1988). Nonlinear Evolution of the Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability in the High Latitude Ionosphere . Technical Report NRL-MR-6043, NAVAL RESEARCH LAB WASHINGTON DC, NAVAL RESEARCH LAB WASHINGTON DC

    work page 1988

  59. [59]

    Kilpua, E., Koskinen, H. E. J., and Pulkkinen, T. I. (2017). Coronal mass ejections and their sheath regions in interplanetary space. Living Reviews in Solar Physics , 14(1):5

    work page 2017

  60. [60]

    Knudsen, D. J. (1990). Alfven Waves and Static Fields in Magnetosphere/Ionosphere Coupling: In-situ Measurements and a Numerical Model . PhD thesis

    work page 1990

  61. [61]

    J., Kelley, M

    Knudsen, D. J., Kelley, M. C., Earle, G. D., Vickrey, J. F., and Boehm, M. (1990). Distinguishing Alfv\'en waves from quasi-static field structures associated with the discrete aurora: Sounding rocket and HILAT satellite measurements. Geophysical Research Letters , 17(7):921--924

    work page 1990

  62. [62]

    Kuhn, H. W. (1955). The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly , 2(1-2):83--97

    work page 1955

  63. [63]

    V., Angelopoulos, V., Lin, Y., Zhang, X.-J., Liu, J., Avanov, L

    Lu, S., Artemyev, A. V., Angelopoulos, V., Lin, Y., Zhang, X.-J., Liu, J., Avanov, L. A., Giles, B. L., Russell, C. T., and Strangeway, R. J. (2019). The Hall Electric Field in Earth 's Magnetotail Thin Current Sheet . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 124(2):1052--1062

    work page 2019

  64. [64]

    Lui, A. T. Y. (2016). Cross-field current instability for auroral bead formation in breakup arcs. Geophysical Research Letters , 43(12):6087--6095

    work page 2016

  65. [65]

    Lysak, R. (1991). Feedback instability of the ionospheric resonant cavity. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

    work page 1991

  66. [66]

    Lysak, R., Echim, M., Karlsson, T., Marghitu, O., Rankin, R., Song, Y., and Watanabe, T.-H. (2020). Quiet, Discrete Auroral Arcs : Acceleration Mechanisms . Space Science Reviews , 216(5):92

    work page 2020

  67. [67]

    Lysak, R. L. (1990). Electrodynamic coupling of the magnetosphere and ionosphere. Space Science Reviews , 52(1):33--87

    work page 1990

  68. [68]

    Lysak, R. L. (1999). Propagation of Alfv\'en waves through the ionosphere: Dependence on ionospheric parameters. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 104(A5):10017--10030

    work page 1999

  69. [69]

    Mallinckrodt, A. J. and Carlson, C. W. (1978). Relations between transverse electric fields and field-aligned currents. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 83(A4):1426--1432

    work page 1978

  70. [70]

    R., Milling, D

    Mann, I. R., Milling, D. K., Rae, I. J., Ozeke, L. G., Kale, A., Kale, Z. C., Murphy, K. R., Parent, A., Usanova, M., Pahud, D. M., Lee, E.-A., Amalraj, V., Wallis, D. D., Angelopoulos, V., Glassmeier, K.-H., Russell, C. T., Auster, H.-U., and Singer, H. J. (2008). The Upgraded CARISMA Magnetometer Array in the THEMIS Era . Space Science Reviews , 141(1):413--451

    work page 2008

  71. [71]

    P., Carlson, C

    McFadden, J. P., Carlson, C. W., Larson, D., Ludlam, M., Abiad, R., Elliott, B., Turin, P., Marckwordt, M., and Angelopoulos, V. (2008). The THEMIS ESA Plasma Instrument and In-flight Calibration . Space Science Reviews , 141(1):277--302

    work page 2008

  72. [72]

    Miyashita, Y., Angelopoulos, V., Fukui, K., and Machida, S. (2018). A Case Study of Near-Earth Magnetotail Conditions at Substorm and Pseudosubstorm Onsets . Geophysical Research Letters , 45(13):6353--6361

    work page 2018

  73. [73]

    and Ieda, A

    Miyashita, Y. and Ieda, A. (2018). Revisiting substorm events with preonset aurora. Annales Geophysicae , 36(5):1419--1438

    work page 2018

  74. [74]

    Miyashita, Y., Ieda, A., and Machida, S. (2025). Evolution of the near- Earth magnetotail associated with substorm onsets: Revisiting the issues of onset timing and substorm triggering mechanism. Earth, Planets and Space , 77(1):15

    work page 2025

  75. [75]

    Newcomb, W. A. (1958). Motion of magnetic lines of force. Annals of Physics , 3(4):347--385

    work page 1958

  76. [76]

    Newell, P. T. and Gjerloev, J. W. (2011a). Evaluation of SuperMAG auroral electrojet indices as indicators of substorms and auroral power. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 116(A12)

    work page

  77. [77]

    Newell, P. T. and Gjerloev, J. W. (2011b). Substorm and magnetosphere characteristic scales inferred from the SuperMAG auroral electrojet indices. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 116(A12)

    work page

  78. [78]

    T., Sotirelis, T., Liou, K., Meng, C.-I., and Rich, F

    Newell, P. T., Sotirelis, T., Liou, K., Meng, C.-I., and Rich, F. J. (2007). A nearly universal solar wind-magnetosphere coupling function inferred from 10 magnetospheric state variables. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 112(A1)

    work page 2007

  79. [79]

    Ockham, W. (1967). Opera philosophica et theologica. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute , 89

    work page 1967

  80. [80]

    B., and Bonnell, J

    Ogasawara, K., Kasaba, Y., Nishimura, Y., Hori, T., Takada, T., Miyashita, Y., Angelopoulos, V., Mende, S. B., and Bonnell, J. (2011). Azimuthal auroral expansion associated with fast flows in the near- Earth plasma sheet: Coordinated observations of the THEMIS all-sky imagers and multiple spacecraft. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 116(A6)

    work page 2011

Showing first 80 references.