pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.13603 · v1 · pith:I3HZOQBFnew · submitted 2026-06-11 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.AI· cs.CL

Beyond the Commitment Boundary: Probing Epiphenomenal Chain-of-Thought in Large Reasoning Models

Daniel Scalena , Sara Candussio , Luca Bortolussi , Elisabetta Fersini , Malvina Nissim , Gabriele Sarti This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 07:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL
keywords chain-of-thoughtcommitment boundaryepiphenomenal reasoningearly exitcausal analysislarge language modelsreasoning models
0
0 comments X

The pith

Large reasoning models typically settle on a stable answer early in chain-of-thought, after which further steps do not alter the output probability.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that chain-of-thought reasoning crosses a commitment boundary, a sharp single-step transition from changing intermediate guesses to a fixed high-confidence answer. This boundary usually occurs well before the end of the generated reasoning block. Later steps are epiphenomenal because they leave the final answer probability unchanged. The authors care about this because it reveals that much of the visible reasoning trace is not causally responsible for the model's decision.

Core claim

Across diverse tasks and several model families, reasoning crosses a commitment boundary—a sharp transition from transient intermediate guesses to a stable, high-confidence answer. This transition often happens in a single step, well before the model's reasoning block ends, and is followed by epiphenomenal CoT steps that leave the final answer probability unaltered. Answer-formation stages can be linearly decoded from intermediate reasoning steps with high accuracy and generalize to unseen tasks, allowing early exit at the boundary to shorten CoTs by up to 55 percent with negligible performance change.

What carries the argument

The commitment boundary, located by early-exit interventions that quantify each step's causal effect on final answer probability.

If this is right

  • Most generated reasoning steps after the commitment boundary exert no causal influence on the answer.
  • Linear probes on intermediate activations can recover the timing of answer formation across tasks.
  • Early exit at the boundary reduces average CoT length by up to 55 percent while preserving accuracy.
  • The linear decoding signal transfers to reasoning tasks not seen during probe training.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Training objectives that penalize post-boundary tokens could produce shorter yet equally accurate traces.
  • The same early-commitment pattern may appear in non-reasoning generation tasks that involve sequential refinement.
  • Attention or activation patterns at the boundary step may expose the internal mechanism that stabilizes the answer.

Load-bearing premise

Early-exit interventions accurately isolate the causal contribution of individual steps without introducing artifacts that alter the model's subsequent internal computation.

What would settle it

An experiment in which continuing the trace past the identified boundary reliably shifts the final answer probability in a manner not produced by the early-exit procedure itself.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.13603 by Daniel Scalena, Elisabetta Fersini, Gabriele Sarti, Luca Bortolussi, Malvina Nissim, Sara Candussio.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of our approach. Top: We use early exit to measure the causal contribution of CoT steps to the model’s final answer and mid-guesses probabilities. We frequently encounter a commitment boundary i ∗ , marking a sharp transition from meaningful reasoning with mid-guesses to a final answer at full-CoT confi￾dence. Bottom: We train lightweight attention probes to predict answer-formation stages from mo… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Answer confidence in reasoning is bimodal. Normalised step confidences p˜i across all CoT steps on gpt-oss-20b MATH-500 traces. Probability mass concentrates near 0 (no-CoT baseline) and 1 (full-CoT). tuation and construct n + 1 prefix sequences as: Xi = P + [BOT] + Ci + [EOT] + S (1) where Ci is C truncated at the i-th sentence-level span, X0 is the no-CoT baseline and Xn = Xfull is the full-CoT condition… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Confidence improvement over CoT tokens, across models and datasets. The relative CoT position of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Perturbations to C<i∗ are most damag￾ing. Fraction of gpt-oss-20b AIME2025 traces whose elicited answer stays ≡ Aˆ n under numeric corruption of the pre- (PRE) and post-boundary (POST) tokens (n = 158, three samples per setting) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Hedging language is frequent in post￾commitment steps. Word cloud of content words appearing at the beginning of post-commitment sen￾tences C>i∗ across all gpt-oss-20b MATH-500 traces. Words associated with self-verification (e.g., “but”, “let’s check”) are disproportionately frequent. only numbers inside it. The unperturbed PRE base￾line reproduces the full-CoT answer on all retained traces, confirming th… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Probe-mediated early exit dominates fixed-percentage truncation at every operating point, with results consistent across in- and out-of-distribution datasets suggesting robust detection capabilities. When applied without modification to AIME 2025, ZebraLogic, and GPQA-Diamond, the probe continues to consistently outperform fixed baselines with small accuracy loss compared to full-CoT (at most 11% on ZebraL… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Mid-guess fraction as a function of τ across models and benchmarks. Each panel shows the fraction of sentence spans classified as mid-guess (orange) vs. no-guess (grey) for a given model (row) and benchmark (column), as τ varies in {0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7}. Final guesses are excluded from the denominator. gpt-oss-20b shows markedly fewer mid-guesses on AIME2025 compared to the other models, suggesting a m… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Guess distribution (top) and average token likelihood (bottom) across CoT positions, relative to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Uncertainty-signalling language is equally frequent before and after the commitment boundary. We show the top-20 sentence-initial words across all models (e.g. roughly 12% of Qwen3-14B sentences begin with "but", at similar rates on both sides of i ∗ ). Manually highlighted words can signal re-verification behaviour – yet their frequency does not meaningfully change after the commitment boundary, confirmi… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Causal optimal early-exit accuracy versus CoT fraction across models for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning is the dominant paradigm for inference-time scaling in language models, yet the causal influence of individual steps on the final answer poorly understood. We estimate each step's causal importance via early exit and use this measure to study how answers form across the reasoning traces of several model families. Across diverse tasks, we find that reasoning typically crosses a \emph{commitment boundary} -- a sharp transition from transient intermediate guesses to a stable, high-confidence answer. This transition often happens in a single step, well before the model's reasoning block ends, and is followed by \emph{epiphenomenal} CoT steps that leave the final answer probability unaltered. Using attention probes, we show that answer-formation stages can be linearly decoded from intermediate reasoning steps with high accuracy and generalize robustly to unseen reasoning tasks. We exploit this signal to early-exit reasoning blocks at the commitment boundary, reducing the length of CoTs up to 55\% on average with negligible impact on model performance.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that chain-of-thought reasoning in large models crosses a commitment boundary—a sharp transition to a stable, high-confidence answer—typically in a single early step, after which subsequent CoT tokens are epiphenomenal and leave final-answer probability unchanged. Early-exit interventions are used to quantify each step’s causal effect on the answer; attention probes show that answer-formation stages can be linearly decoded from intermediate steps and generalize to unseen tasks. The authors exploit the boundary signal to truncate reasoning traces, achieving up to 55% length reduction with negligible performance impact across tasks and model families.

Significance. If the early-exit measurements are causally faithful, the work supplies a concrete, falsifiable account of how answers stabilize during inference-time scaling and a practical compression technique. The linear-decodability result and cross-task generalization are concrete strengths that could inform both mechanistic interpretability and efficient deployment.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (methods paragraph): the central claim that post-boundary steps are epiphenomenal rests on early-exit interventions isolating causal contributions. No quantitative control is described that compares early-exit trajectories against full-trace continuations with post-k tokens masked or replaced, leaving open the possibility that truncation artifacts alter residual-stream or attention dynamics and produce the observed flat probability curve.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (results paragraph): the reported 55% average length reduction is presented without accompanying per-task or per-model variance, statistical significance tests, or ablation against simple length baselines (e.g., fixed-step truncation), making it impossible to assess whether the savings are attributable to the commitment-boundary detector rather than generic early stopping.
minor comments (1)
  1. The term “epiphenomenal” is used without an explicit operational definition tying it to the early-exit probability metric; a short clarifying sentence would prevent ambiguity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on methodological controls and statistical reporting. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the causal claims and result presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (methods paragraph): the central claim that post-boundary steps are epiphenomenal rests on early-exit interventions isolating causal contributions. No quantitative control is described that compares early-exit trajectories against full-trace continuations with post-k tokens masked or replaced, leaving open the possibility that truncation artifacts alter residual-stream or attention dynamics and produce the observed flat probability curve.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit control for potential truncation artifacts would strengthen the causal interpretation. In the revised manuscript we will add experiments that continue full traces but mask or replace all tokens after the detected commitment boundary, then compare the resulting answer-probability trajectories to those obtained via early exit. This will quantify whether the flat probability curve is an artifact of the intervention or a genuine property of post-boundary steps. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (results paragraph): the reported 55% average length reduction is presented without accompanying per-task or per-model variance, statistical significance tests, or ablation against simple length baselines (e.g., fixed-step truncation), making it impossible to assess whether the savings are attributable to the commitment-boundary detector rather than generic early stopping.

    Authors: We concur that variance, significance testing, and baseline ablations are required for proper evaluation. The revision will report per-task and per-model standard deviations, include paired statistical tests on performance differences, and add an ablation that compares boundary-based early exit against fixed-step truncation at equivalent average lengths. These additions will isolate the contribution of the commitment-boundary signal. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Empirical measurement study with no self-referential derivations

full rationale

The paper is an empirical investigation that estimates step importance via early-exit interventions and observes patterns such as the commitment boundary in reasoning traces. No equations, fitted parameters, or derivations are presented that reduce any reported result (boundary location, epiphenomenal steps, or early-exit benefit) to quantities defined or fitted from the same data by construction. Claims rest on direct measurement across model families and tasks rather than self-citation chains or ansatzes smuggled via prior work. The central findings are falsifiable via the described interventions and do not collapse to input definitions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The commitment boundary is presented as an observed empirical transition rather than a postulated construct.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5736 in / 1009 out tokens · 25038 ms · 2026-06-27T07:15:40.112683+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 141 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The Proceedings for the 15th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment Social Media Analysis ( WASSA 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.0

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.0 2026

  2. [2]

    Council of LLM s: Evaluating Capability of Large Language Models to Annotate Propaganda

    Sharma, Vivek and Jain, Shweta and Shokri, Mohammad and Levitan, Sarah Ita and Filatova, Elena. Council of LLM s: Evaluating Capability of Large Language Models to Annotate Propaganda. The Proceedings for the 15th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment Social Media Analysis ( WASSA 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.1

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.1 2026

  3. [3]

    Emoji Reactions on Telegram: Unreliable Indicators of Emotional Resonance

    Tardelli, Serena and Alvisi, Lorenzo and Cima, Lorenzo and Cresci, Stefano and Tesconi, Maurizio. Emoji Reactions on Telegram: Unreliable Indicators of Emotional Resonance. The Proceedings for the 15th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment Social Media Analysis ( WASSA 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.2

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.2 2026

  4. [4]

    Quantifying Social Sentiment in Hostels Using A Domain-Specific Transformer Pipeline

    McMurry, Ian W. Quantifying Social Sentiment in Hostels Using A Domain-Specific Transformer Pipeline. The Proceedings for the 15th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment Social Media Analysis ( WASSA 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.3

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.3 2026

  5. [5]

    Predicting Convincingness in Political Speech: How Emotional Tone Shapes Persuasive Strength

    Verma, Bhuvanesh and Marreddy, Mounika and Mehler, Alexander. Predicting Convincingness in Political Speech: How Emotional Tone Shapes Persuasive Strength. The Proceedings for the 15th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment Social Media Analysis ( WASSA 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.4

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.4 2026

  6. [6]

    Measuring LLM s' Sensitivity to Paraphrased Opinion Prompts

    Alhetelah, Bushra and Ahmad, Irfan. Measuring LLM s' Sensitivity to Paraphrased Opinion Prompts. The Proceedings for the 15th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment Social Media Analysis ( WASSA 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.5

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.5 2026

  7. [7]

    The Impact of Highlighting Subjective Language on Perceived News Trustworthiness

    Shokri, Mohammad and Sharma, Vivek and Klapper, Emily and Jain, Shweta and Filatova, Elena and Levitan, Sarah Ita. The Impact of Highlighting Subjective Language on Perceived News Trustworthiness. The Proceedings for the 15th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment Social Media Analysis ( WASSA 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.6

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.6 2026

  8. [8]

    Appraisal Trajectories in Narratives Reveal Distinct Patterns of Emotion Evocation

    Sch. Appraisal Trajectories in Narratives Reveal Distinct Patterns of Emotion Evocation. The Proceedings for the 15th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment Social Media Analysis ( WASSA 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.7

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.7 2026

  9. [9]

    Exploring Subjective Tasks in F arsi: A Survey Analysis and Evaluation of Language Model

    Rooein, Donya and Plaza-del-Arco, Flor Miriam and Nozza, Debora and Hovy, Dirk. Exploring Subjective Tasks in F arsi: A Survey Analysis and Evaluation of Language Models. The Proceedings for the 15th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment Social Media Analysis ( WASSA 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.8

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.8 2026

  10. [10]

    and Loukachevitch, Natalia V

    Iaroshenko, Polina V. and Loukachevitch, Natalia V. Emotional Lexicons: How Large Language Models Predict Emotional Ratings of R ussian Words. The Proceedings for the 15th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment Social Media Analysis ( WASSA 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.9

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.9 2026

  11. [11]

    Emotion-aware text simplification of user generated content using LLM s

    Bezobrazova, Anastasiia and Sokova, Daria and Orasan, Constantin. Emotion-aware text simplification of user generated content using LLM s. The Proceedings for the 15th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment Social Media Analysis ( WASSA 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.10

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.10 2026

  12. [12]

    Crowd-Based Evaluation of Emotion Intensity Preservation in S panish -- B asque Tweet Machine Translation

    Aranberri, Nora. Crowd-Based Evaluation of Emotion Intensity Preservation in S panish -- B asque Tweet Machine Translation. The Proceedings for the 15th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment Social Media Analysis ( WASSA 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.11

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.11 2026

  13. [13]

    and Markov, Ilia and Vossen, Piek

    Schouten, Stefan F. and Markov, Ilia and Vossen, Piek. A Position Paper on Toxic Reasoning: Grounding Categories of Toxic Language in Implications and Attitudes. The Proceedings for the 15th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment Social Media Analysis ( WASSA 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.12

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.12 2026

  14. [14]

    Is Sentiment Banana-Shaped? Exploring the Geometry and Portability of Sentiment Concept Vectors

    Lyngbaek, Laurits and Feldkamp, Pascale and Bizzoni, Yuri and Nielbo, Kristoffer and Enevoldsen, Kenneth. Is Sentiment Banana-Shaped? Exploring the Geometry and Portability of Sentiment Concept Vectors. The Proceedings for the 15th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment Social Media Analysis ( WASSA 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/20...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.13 2026

  15. [15]

    Disentangling Emotion Understanding and Generation in Large Language Models

    Jafari, Sadegh and Lefever, Els and Hoste, Veronique. Disentangling Emotion Understanding and Generation in Large Language Models. The Proceedings for the 15th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment Social Media Analysis ( WASSA 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.14

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.14 2026

  16. [16]

    News Credibility Assessment by LLM s and Humans: Implications for Political Bias

    Neves, Pia Wenzel and Jakob, Charlott and Schmitt, Vera. News Credibility Assessment by LLM s and Humans: Implications for Political Bias. The Proceedings for the 15th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment Social Media Analysis ( WASSA 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.15

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.15 2026

  17. [17]

    Towards Simulating Social Media Users with LLM s: Evaluating the Operational Validity of Conditioned Comment Prediction

    Schwager, Nils and M. Towards Simulating Social Media Users with LLM s: Evaluating the Operational Validity of Conditioned Comment Prediction. The Proceedings for the 15th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment Social Media Analysis ( WASSA 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.16

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.16 2026

  18. [18]

    Label-Consistent Data Generation for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis Using LLM Agents

    Monfared, Mohammad Hossein Akbari and Flek, Lucie and Karimi, Akbar. Label-Consistent Data Generation for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis Using LLM Agents. The Proceedings for the 15th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment Social Media Analysis ( WASSA 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.17

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.17 2026

  19. [19]

    Antisocial Behavior Prediction: A Survey and Practical Guide

    Ollagnier, Ana. Antisocial Behavior Prediction: A Survey and Practical Guide. The Proceedings for the 15th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment Social Media Analysis ( WASSA 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.18

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.18 2026

  20. [20]

    Real-Time Mitigation of Negative Emotion in Customer Care Calls

    Gangopadhyay, Surupendu and Mehrabani, Mahnoosh. Real-Time Mitigation of Negative Emotion in Customer Care Calls. The Proceedings for the 15th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment Social Media Analysis ( WASSA 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.19

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.19 2026

  21. [21]

    Says Who? Argument Convincingness and Reader Stance Are Correlated with Perceived Author Personality

    Weber, Sabine and Greschner, Lynn and Klinger, Roman. Says Who? Argument Convincingness and Reader Stance Are Correlated with Perceived Author Personality. The Proceedings for the 15th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment Social Media Analysis ( WASSA 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.20

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.20 2026

  22. [22]

    A Transformer and Prototype-based Interpretable Model for Contextual Sarcasm Detection

    Wen, Ximing and Rezapour, Rezvaneh. A Transformer and Prototype-based Interpretable Model for Contextual Sarcasm Detection. The Proceedings for the 15th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment Social Media Analysis ( WASSA 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.21

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.21 2026

  23. [23]

    Multimodal Claim Extraction for Fact-Checking

    Teo, Joycelyn and Cao, Rui and Deng, Zhenyun and Ding, Zifeng and Schlichtkrull, Michael Sejr and Vlachos, Andreas. Multimodal Claim Extraction for Fact-Checking. The Proceedings for the 15th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment Social Media Analysis ( WASSA 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.22

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.22 2026

  24. [24]

    A Multi-Aspect Evaluation Framework for Synthetic Data: Case Study on Irony and Sarcasm

    Majer, Laura and Bari \'c , Ana and Sandalj, Florijan and Unkovi \'c , Ivan and Puva c a, Bojan and S najder, Jan. A Multi-Aspect Evaluation Framework for Synthetic Data: Case Study on Irony and Sarcasm. The Proceedings for the 15th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment Social Media Analysis ( WASSA 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.wassa-1.23 2026

  25. [25]

    Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.0

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.0 2026

  26. [26]

    and Abdelmoneim, Shahd and Kantharuban, Anjali and Alsboul, Otba and Lamsiyah, Salima and Marchisio, Kelly and Murray, Kenton

    Robinson, Nathaniel R. and Abdelmoneim, Shahd and Kantharuban, Anjali and Alsboul, Otba and Lamsiyah, Salima and Marchisio, Kelly and Murray, Kenton. AMIYA Shared Task: A rabic Modeling In Your Accent at V ar D ial 2026. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.1

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.1 2026

  27. [27]

    Far Out: Evaluating Language Models on Slang in A ustralian and I ndian E nglish

    Dilsiz, Deniz Kaya and Srirag, Dipankar and Joshi, Aditya. Far Out: Evaluating Language Models on Slang in A ustralian and I ndian E nglish. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.2

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.2 2026

  28. [28]

    Effects of Speaker Bias in Dialect Identification and Automatic Transcription with Self-Supervised Speech Models

    Kuparinen, Olli. Effects of Speaker Bias in Dialect Identification and Automatic Transcription with Self-Supervised Speech Models. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.3

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.3 2026

  29. [29]

    O c W iki D ialects: A W ikipedia Dataset With Rich Metadata for O ccitan Dialect Identification

    N \'e dey, Oriane and Bawden, Rachel and Cl \'e rice, Thibault and Sagot, Beno \^i t. O c W iki D ialects: A W ikipedia Dataset With Rich Metadata for O ccitan Dialect Identification. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.4

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.4 2026

  30. [30]

    and Garcia, Marcos

    Irastortza-Urbieta, Xabier and Garc \'i a-Miguel, Jos \'e M. and Garcia, Marcos. Language Mixture to Develop Accurate G alician Dependency Parsers: An Exploration of Its Effects. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.5

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.5 2026

  31. [31]

    Crowdsourcing Piedmontese to Test LLM s on Non-Standard Orthography

    Vico, Gianluca and Libovick \'y , Jind r ich. Crowdsourcing P iedmontese to Test LLM s on Non-Standard Orthography. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.6

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.6 2026

  32. [32]

    G erman- E nglish Code-Switching in Large Language Models

    Aks. G erman- E nglish Code-Switching in Large Language Models. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.7

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.7 2026

  33. [33]

    Perplexity as a Metric for Dialectal Distance: A Computational Study of G reek Varieties

    Chatzikyriakidis, Stergios and Psaltaki, Erofili and Papadakis, Dimitrios and Henriksson, Erik and Laippala, Veronika. Perplexity as a Metric for Dialectal Distance: A Computational Study of G reek Varieties. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.8

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.8 2026

  34. [34]

    A Subword Embedding Approach for Variation Detection in L uxembourgish User Comments

    Lutgen, Anne-Marie and Plum, Alistair and Purschke, Christoph. A Subword Embedding Approach for Variation Detection in L uxembourgish User Comments. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.9

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.9 2026

  35. [35]

    Onomasiological Sense Alignment Across Dialect Dictionaries

    Mederake, Nathalie and Urbach, Nico and Fischer, Hanna and Lameli, Alfred. Onomasiological Sense Alignment Across Dialect Dictionaries. A Taxonomy-Constrained LLM Classification. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.10

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.10 2026

  36. [36]

    and Uban, Ana Sabina and Marchitan, Teodor-George and Iordache, Ioan-Bogdan and Georgescu, Simona

    Dinu, Liviu P. and Uban, Ana Sabina and Marchitan, Teodor-George and Iordache, Ioan-Bogdan and Georgescu, Simona. On the Intelligibility of R omance Language Varieties: S panish and P ortuguese in E urope and A merica. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.11

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.11 2026

  37. [37]

    Dialect Matters: Cross-Lingual ASR Transfer for Low-Resource I ndic Language Varieties

    Dhasmana, Akriti and Srivastava, Aarohi and Chiang, David. Dialect Matters: Cross-Lingual ASR Transfer for Low-Resource I ndic Language Varieties. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.12

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.12 2026

  38. [38]

    Ara- HOPE : Human-Centric Post-Editing Evaluation for Dialectal A rabic to M odern S tandard A rabic Translation

    Alabdullah, Abdullah and Han, Lifeng and Lin, Chenghua. Ara- HOPE : Human-Centric Post-Editing Evaluation for Dialectal A rabic to M odern S tandard A rabic Translation. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.13

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.13 2026

  39. [39]

    I ndic- T uned L ens: Interpreting Multilingual Models in I ndian Languages

    Panchal, Mihir and Varshney, Deeksha and ., Mamta and Ekbal, Asif. I ndic- T uned L ens: Interpreting Multilingual Models in I ndian Languages. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.14

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.14 2026

  40. [40]

    Building ASR Resources for the Hutsul Dialect of U krainian

    Kyslyi, Roman and Orlovskyi, Artem and Khomenko, Pavlo and Onyshchenko, Bohdan and Guzii, Zakhar. Building ASR Resources for the Hutsul Dialect of U krainian. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.15

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.15 2026

  41. [41]

    From F us H a to Folk: Exploring Cross-Lingual Transfer in A rabic Language Models

    Khalak, Abdulmuizz and Issam, Abderrahmane and Spanakis, Gerasimos. From F us H a to Folk: Exploring Cross-Lingual Transfer in A rabic Language Models. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.16

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.16 2026

  42. [42]

    Extending ASR Evaluation Resources for M odern G reek Dialects

    Tsoukala, Chara and Bompolas, Stavros and Margariti, Antigoni and Panagiotou, Konstantina and Plaiti, Maria Elisavet and Tzanakaki, Nefeli and Karatsareas, Petros and Ralli, Angela and Anastasopoulos, Antonios and Markantonatou, Stella. Extending ASR Evaluation Resources for M odern G reek Dialects. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Lang...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.17 2026

  43. [43]

    How Should We Model the Probability of a Language?

    Dent, Rasul and Ortiz Suarez, Pedro and Cl \'e rice, Thibault and Sagot, Beno \^i t. How Should We Model the Probability of a Language?. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.18

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.18 2026

  44. [44]

    Bridging Dialectal Variation: A Phonetic Transcription Tool for T amil

    Mahaganapathy, Ahrane and Karunakaran, Sumirtha and Navakulan, Kavitha and Sarveswaran, Kengatharaiyer. Bridging Dialectal Variation: A Phonetic Transcription Tool for T amil. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.19

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.19 2026

  45. [45]

    Regional Variation in the Performance of ASR Models on C roatian and S erbian

    Samard z i \'c , Tanja and Rupnik, Peter and Ljube s i \'c , Nikola. Regional Variation in the Performance of ASR Models on C roatian and S erbian. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.20

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.20 2026

  46. [46]

    Syllable Structures Across A rabic Varieties

    Qaddoumi, Abdelrahim and Kodner, Jordan and Khalifa, Salam and Broselow, Ellen and Rambow, Owen. Syllable Structures Across A rabic Varieties. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.21

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.21 2026

  47. [47]

    Curriculum Learning and Pseudo-Labeling Improve the Generalization of Multi-Label A rabic Dialect Identification Models

    Mekky, Ali and El Zeftawy, Mohamed and Hassan, Lara and Keleg, Amr and Nakov, Preslav. Curriculum Learning and Pseudo-Labeling Improve the Generalization of Multi-Label A rabic Dialect Identification Models. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.22

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.22 2026

  48. [48]

    O pen LID -v3: Improving the Precision of Closely Related Language Identification -- An Experience Report

    Fedorova, Mariia and Arefyev, Nikolay and Buljan, Maja and Helcl, Jind r ich and Oepen, Stephan and R nningstad, Egil and Scherrer, Yves. O pen LID -v3: Improving the Precision of Closely Related Language Identification -- An Experience Report. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/202...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.23 2026

  49. [49]

    Improving Dialect Robustness in Large Language Models via L o RA and Mixture-of-Experts

    Maheshwari, Sanjh and Rajpoot, Aniket Singh and Cocarascu, Oana and ., Mamta. Improving Dialect Robustness in Large Language Models via L o RA and Mixture-of-Experts. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.24

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.24 2026

  50. [50]

    Evaluation Framework for Transfer Learning between Closely Related Lects: A Case Study of Lemko

    Afanasev, Ilia. Evaluation Framework for Transfer Learning between Closely Related Lects: A Case Study of Lemko. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.25

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.25 2026

  51. [51]

    Do Large Language Models Adapt to Language Variation across Socioeconomic Status?

    Bassignana, Elisa and Zhang, Mike and Hovy, Dirk and Cercas Curry, Amanda. Do Large Language Models Adapt to Language Variation across Socioeconomic Status?. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.26

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.26 2026

  52. [52]

    Aladdin- FTI @ AMIYA Three Wishes for A rabic NLP : Fidelity, Diglossia, and Multidialectal Generation

    Mutal, Jonathan and Al Almaoui, Perla and Hengchen, Simon and Bouillon, Pierrette. Aladdin- FTI @ AMIYA Three Wishes for A rabic NLP : Fidelity, Diglossia, and Multidialectal Generation. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.27

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.27 2026

  53. [53]

    Maastricht University at AMIYA : Adapting LLM s for Dialectal A rabic using Fine-tuning and MBR Decoding

    Alali, Abdulhai and Issam, Abderrahmane. Maastricht University at AMIYA : Adapting LLM s for Dialectal A rabic using Fine-tuning and MBR Decoding. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.28

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.28 2026

  54. [54]

    SDNLP at AMIYA 2026: S yrian A rabic Dialect Modeling with L o RA

    Alkhder, Hasan and Abboush, Mohammad. SDNLP at AMIYA 2026: S yrian A rabic Dialect Modeling with L o RA. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.29

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.29 2026

  55. [55]

    NUS - IDS at AMIYA / V ar D ial 2026: Improving A rabic Dialectness in LLM s with Reinforcement Learning

    Gollapalli, Sujatha Das and Hakam, Mouad and Du, Mingzhe and Ng, See-Kiong. NUS - IDS at AMIYA / V ar D ial 2026: Improving A rabic Dialectness in LLM s with Reinforcement Learning. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.30

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.30 2026

  56. [56]

    MBZUAI at AMIYA Shared Task 2026: Adapting Open-Source LLM s for Dialectal A rabic

    Gaber, Rana and Allam, Yara and Amin, Serag and Aly, Ranwa and Alhafni, Bashar. MBZUAI at AMIYA Shared Task 2026: Adapting Open-Source LLM s for Dialectal A rabic. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.31

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.31 2026

  57. [57]

    A Closed-Track System for Palestinian A rabic in the AMIYA Shared Task

    Hamad, Khaleel and Al-Najjar, Ahmad. A Closed-Track System for Palestinian A rabic in the AMIYA Shared Task. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.32

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.vardial-1.32 2026

  58. [58]

    Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Teaching Natural Language Processing ( T each NLP 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.0

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.0 2026

  59. [59]

    A nimated LLM : Explaining LLM s with Interactive Visualizations

    Kasner, Zden e k and Dusek, Ondrej. A nimated LLM : Explaining LLM s with Interactive Visualizations. Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Teaching Natural Language Processing ( T each NLP 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.1

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.1 2026

  60. [60]

    Pedagogic Applications of Argument Maps to Enhance Critical Thinking: Thought Seeds, Argument Mapping, Collaborative Mapping

    Narra, Sruti. Pedagogic Applications of Argument Maps to Enhance Critical Thinking: Thought Seeds, Argument Mapping, Collaborative Mapping. Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Teaching Natural Language Processing ( T each NLP 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.2

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.2 2026

  61. [61]

    From Code-Centric to Concept-Centric: Teaching NLP with LLM -Assisted ``Vibe Coding''

    Al-Khalifa, Hend. From Code-Centric to Concept-Centric: Teaching NLP with LLM -Assisted ``Vibe Coding''. Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Teaching Natural Language Processing ( T each NLP 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.3

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.3 2026

  62. [62]

    Linguistics to LLM s: Teaching with and about Chatbots

    Pado, Ulrike and Pampel, Barbara. Linguistics to LLM s: Teaching with and about Chatbots. Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Teaching Natural Language Processing ( T each NLP 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.4

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.4 2026

  63. [63]

    Language Technology Initiative: Framework for Teaching NLP and Computational Linguistics at the Universities in L atvia

    Skadina, Inguna and Kuzmina, Jana and Platonova, Marina and Smirnova, Tatjana and Kruk, Sergei. Language Technology Initiative: Framework for Teaching NLP and Computational Linguistics at the Universities in L atvia. Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Teaching Natural Language Processing ( T each NLP 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.5

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.5 2026

  64. [64]

    Teaching NLP in the AI Era: Experiences from the U niversity of L atvia

    Skadina, Inguna and Barzdins, Guntis and Boj \= a rs, Uldis and Gruzitis, Normunds and Paikens, P \= e teris. Teaching NLP in the AI Era: Experiences from the U niversity of L atvia. Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Teaching Natural Language Processing ( T each NLP 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.6

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.6 2026

  65. [65]

    A Hands-on Approach to NLP Fundamentals for External Domain Experts in the LLM Era

    Daza, Angel. A Hands-on Approach to NLP Fundamentals for External Domain Experts in the LLM Era. Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Teaching Natural Language Processing ( T each NLP 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.7

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.7 2026

  66. [66]

    and Chervyakov, Artem and Zaytsev, Alexey and Panchenko, Alexander

    Tikhonova, Maria and Chekalina, Viktoriia A. and Chervyakov, Artem and Zaytsev, Alexey and Panchenko, Alexander. From Standard Transformers to M odern LLM s: Bringing Dialogue Models, RAG , and Agents to the Classroom. Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Teaching Natural Language Processing ( T each NLP 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.8

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.8 2026

  67. [67]

    Which course? Discourse! Teaching Discourse and Generation in the Era of LLM s

    Li, Junyi Jessy and Liu, Yang Janet and Misra, Kanishka and Pyatkin, Valentina and Sheffield, William. Which course? Discourse! Teaching Discourse and Generation in the Era of LLM s. Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Teaching Natural Language Processing ( T each NLP 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.9

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.9 2026

  68. [68]

    From Mixed Backgrounds to NLP Skills

    Barak, Libby and Feldman, Anna. From Mixed Backgrounds to NLP Skills. Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Teaching Natural Language Processing ( T each NLP 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.10

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.10 2026

  69. [69]

    Teaching and Critiquing Conceptualization and Operationalization in NLP

    Gautam, Vagrant. Teaching and Critiquing Conceptualization and Operationalization in NLP. Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Teaching Natural Language Processing ( T each NLP 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.11

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.11 2026

  70. [70]

    Bridging Applied Experience and Research Contexts in U krainian NLP Education

    Paniv, Yurii and Makovska, Viktoriia. Bridging Applied Experience and Research Contexts in U krainian NLP Education. Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Teaching Natural Language Processing ( T each NLP 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.12

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.12 2026

  71. [71]

    Teaching M odern NLP and LLM s at Kyiv School of Economics: A Practice-Oriented Course with U krainian Language Focus

    Kyslyi, Roman and Bazdyrev, Anton. Teaching M odern NLP and LLM s at Kyiv School of Economics: A Practice-Oriented Course with U krainian Language Focus. Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Teaching Natural Language Processing ( T each NLP 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.13

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.13 2026

  72. [72]

    Practising responsibility: Ethics in NLP as a hands-on course

    Nissim, Malvina and Patti, Viviana and Savoldi, Beatrice. Practising responsibility: Ethics in NLP as a hands-on course. Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Teaching Natural Language Processing ( T each NLP 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.14

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.14 2026

  73. [73]

    Beyond Passive Viewing: A Pilot Study of a Hybrid Learning Platform Augmenting Video Lectures with Conversational AI

    Abraar, Mohammed and Dandekar, Raj and Dandekar, Rajat and Panat, Sreedath. Beyond Passive Viewing: A Pilot Study of a Hybrid Learning Platform Augmenting Video Lectures with Conversational AI. Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Teaching Natural Language Processing ( T each NLP 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.15

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.15 2026

  74. [74]

    From Sentiment to Interpretation: Teaching NLP for Literary Understanding Across Educational Contexts

    Bilstrup, Karl-Emil Kj r and Degn, Kirstine Nielsen and Schultz, Morten and Conroy, Alexander and Bjerring-Hansen, Jens and Hershcovich, Daniel. From Sentiment to Interpretation: Teaching NLP for Literary Understanding Across Educational Contexts. Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Teaching Natural Language Processing ( T each NLP 2026). 2026. doi:10....

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.16 2026

  75. [75]

    Novel or Drivel? Variants of Invariants for Teaching NLP in the LLM Era

    Micluța-C \^a mpeanu, Marius. Novel or Drivel? Variants of Invariants for Teaching NLP in the LLM Era. Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Teaching Natural Language Processing ( T each NLP 2026). 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.17

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.teachingnlp-1.17 2026

  76. [76]

    A ctive LLM : Large Language Model-Based Active Learning for Textual Few-Shot Scenarios

    Bayer, Markus and Lutz, Justin and Reuter, Christian. A ctive LLM : Large Language Model-Based Active Learning for Textual Few-Shot Scenarios. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2026. doi:10.1162/tacl.a.63

    work page doi:10.1162/tacl.a.63 2026

  77. [77]

    M o N a C o: More Natural and Complex Questions for Reasoning Across Dozens of Documents

    Wolfson, Tomer and Trivedi, Harsh and Geva, Mor and Goldberg, Yoav and Roth, Dan and Khot, Tushar and Sabharwal, Ashish and Tsarfaty, Reut. M o N a C o: More Natural and Complex Questions for Reasoning Across Dozens of Documents. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2026. doi:10.1162/tacl.a.64

    work page doi:10.1162/tacl.a.64 2026

  78. [78]

    D eep T rans: Deep Reasoning Translation via Reinforcement Learning

    Wang, Jiaan and Meng, Fandong and Zhou, Jie. D eep T rans: Deep Reasoning Translation via Reinforcement Learning. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2026. doi:10.1162/tacl.a.65

    work page doi:10.1162/tacl.a.65 2026

  79. [79]

    C oref I nst: Leveraging LLM s for Multilingual Coreference Resolution

    Pamay Arslan, Tu. C oref I nst: Leveraging LLM s for Multilingual Coreference Resolution. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2026. doi:10.1162/tacl.a.593

    work page doi:10.1162/tacl.a.593 2026

  80. [80]

    and Josyula, Yasasvi and Choi, Jinho D

    Finch, James D. and Josyula, Yasasvi and Choi, Jinho D. Generative Induction of Dialogue Task Schemas with Streaming Refinement and Simulated Interactions. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2026. doi:10.1162/tacl.a.66

    work page doi:10.1162/tacl.a.66 2026

Showing first 80 references.