Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 52 references

Numerical simulations show 10 Hz Alfven waves trigger cyclotron resonance that precipitates 125 MeV protons from stable orbits in the inner Van Allen belt.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-27 20:24 UTC pith:KEFRDNPE

load-bearing objection Standard kinetic + FDTD run applied to IITMSAT context yields a 10 Hz resonance claim, but the precipitation prediction hinges on an unvalidated velocity-space distribution. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2606.18269 v1 pith:KEFRDNPE submitted 2026-06-05 physics.space-ph astro-ph.EPphysics.plasm-ph

Numerical Study of Alfven Wave-Energetic Particle Interaction in the Inner Van Allen Belt and predictions of Seismic-Related Energetic Proton Bursts for the IITMSAT Mission

Snehanshu Maiti , Harishankar Ramachandran This is my paper
classification physics.space-ph astro-ph.EPphysics.plasm-ph
keywords Alfven wavesVan Allen beltenergetic proton precipitationcyclotron resonanceseismic precursorsparticle burstsnano-satellite
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a kinetic model of trapped energetic protons whose steady-state distribution matches observed densities in the inner radiation belt. It then applies Finite Difference Time Domain simulations to narrowband Alfven wave packets and broadband background noise. At an Alfven frequency of 10 Hz the waves meet a sharp cyclotron resonance condition that ejects 125 MeV protons from their mirror orbits at rates far above background levels. The resulting precipitation events are proposed as detectable signatures of low-frequency seismic emissions. These results are used to forecast the best orbital altitude for a nano-satellite to observe such bursts as possible earthquake precursors.

Core claim

A sharp cyclotron resonance condition arises at a low Alfven frequency of 10 Hz, causing substantial precipitation of high energy protons of 125 MeV from their stable mirror orbits. This precipitation can be clearly distinguished from background noisy interactions.

What carries the argument

Finite Difference Time Domain simulation of narrow-band Alfven wave packets interacting with a kinetic steady-state distribution of trapped protons that reproduces the observed density profile.

Load-bearing premise

The kinetic model of the energetic trapped proton population in the inner belt yields a steady-state distribution that reproduces the observed density profile.

What would settle it

Satellite measurements that show no distinguishable increase in 125 MeV proton precipitation during intervals of 10 Hz narrowband Alfven activity compared with broadband magnetohydrodynamic noise.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a kinetic model for the steady-state distribution of trapped energetic protons in the inner Van Allen belt that reproduces observed density profiles. It then employs FDTD simulations of narrowband 10 Hz Alfvén wave packets and broadband noise to study resonant interactions, claiming that a sharp cyclotron resonance condition at 10 Hz produces substantial precipitation of 125 MeV protons distinguishable from background, and uses these results to predict the optimal orbital altitude for the IITMSAT mission to detect seismic-related proton bursts.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work supplies a concrete numerical prediction (10 Hz resonance and distinguishable 125 MeV precipitation) that directly supports the scientific objectives of the IITMSAT nano-satellite mission, linking inner-belt wave-particle physics to potential earthquake-precursor observations. The identification of a low-frequency resonance offers a falsifiable signature for future in-situ measurements.

major comments (3)
  1. [Kinetic model and steady-state distribution] The kinetic model is reported to yield a steady-state distribution that reproduces the observed density profile, yet the abstract and methods provide no comparison of the model's differential flux or pitch-angle anisotropy at ~125 MeV and the resonant pitch angles satisfying the cyclotron condition ω − k∥v∥ = Ωp/γ. Because density is an integral constraint, this leaves the fraction of particles meeting resonance (and thus the precipitation rate) unvalidated.
  2. [FDTD simulation results and resonance analysis] The FDTD results assert 'substantial precipitation' and clear distinction from background noisy interactions at 10 Hz, but no quantitative precipitation fluxes, resonance widths, or sensitivity tests to wave amplitude, spectrum, or background density are reported. Without these, the claim that the 10 Hz signal is observationally distinguishable remains unsupported.
  3. [Prediction of optimal orbital altitude] The optimal satellite altitude prediction is derived directly from the simulated precipitation altitudes; however, because the underlying proton distribution at resonant velocities has not been validated against differential measurements (e.g., at L ≈ 1.5–2), the altitude prediction inherits the same untested dependence on the detailed phase-space density.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and methods] Notation for Alfvén frequency and cyclotron frequency should be defined explicitly with symbols when first introduced.
  2. [Results] The manuscript should include at least one figure or table showing the model's proton distribution function at the resonant energy and pitch angles, even if only as a supplementary plot.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. These have highlighted areas where additional validation and quantification will strengthen the manuscript. We respond to each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Kinetic model and steady-state distribution] The kinetic model is reported to yield a steady-state distribution that reproduces the observed density profile, yet the abstract and methods provide no comparison of the model's differential flux or pitch-angle anisotropy at ~125 MeV and the resonant pitch angles satisfying the cyclotron condition ω − k∥v∥ = Ωp/γ. Because density is an integral constraint, this leaves the fraction of particles meeting resonance (and thus the precipitation rate) unvalidated.

    Authors: We agree that reproducing only the integrated density leaves the resonant fraction less directly validated. The kinetic model follows standard quasi-linear formulations with loss-cone and source terms tuned to match observed omnidirectional fluxes from prior missions. In the revised manuscript we will add explicit plots of the differential flux and pitch-angle distribution at 125 MeV, together with the resonant pitch angles computed from the cyclotron condition, and compare these against available differential measurements at L ≈ 1.5–2 where possible. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [FDTD simulation results and resonance analysis] The FDTD results assert 'substantial precipitation' and clear distinction from background noisy interactions at 10 Hz, but no quantitative precipitation fluxes, resonance widths, or sensitivity tests to wave amplitude, spectrum, or background density are reported. Without these, the claim that the 10 Hz signal is observationally distinguishable remains unsupported.

    Authors: We accept that quantitative metrics are needed to support the distinguishability claim. The current FDTD runs demonstrate clear differences in particle orbit evolution between the narrowband 10 Hz packets and the broadband noise. In revision we will report (i) estimated precipitation fluxes obtained by counting particles that cross the loss cone, (ii) resonance widths derived from the wave spectrum, and (iii) sensitivity tests varying wave amplitude, spectral width, and background density to quantify how robust the 10 Hz signature remains. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Prediction of optimal orbital altitude] The optimal satellite altitude prediction is derived directly from the simulated precipitation altitudes; however, because the underlying proton distribution at resonant velocities has not been validated against differential measurements (e.g., at L ≈ 1.5–2), the altitude prediction inherits the same untested dependence on the detailed phase-space density.

    Authors: The altitude prediction follows from the altitudes at which the simulated wave packets satisfy the resonance condition and drive precipitation; these altitudes are set primarily by the wave dispersion and geomagnetic field geometry rather than the absolute normalization of the distribution. We will revise the text to clarify this distinction, add a brief uncertainty discussion tied to the phase-space density assumptions, and note that the recommended altitude targets the observable signature of 10 Hz-triggered bursts rather than an absolute flux value. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; model match to density is external constraint, precipitation and altitude prediction follow from simulation

full rationale

The paper develops a kinetic model whose steady-state distribution is stated to reproduce the observed density profile (an external observational constraint). It then applies FDTD simulation of Alfvén wave packets to this distribution, identifies a cyclotron resonance at 10 Hz that produces 125 MeV proton precipitation, and derives an optimal orbital altitude from those simulation outputs. No equation or step reduces the precipitation rate or altitude prediction to the density match by construction, nor is any load-bearing premise justified solely by self-citation. The velocity-space details required for resonance are supplied by the model's assumptions rather than being forced by the integrated density alone. This constitutes a standard forward simulation workflow with an independent prediction step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the kinetic model's ability to match observed proton densities and on the assumption that FDTD accurately captures resonant wave-particle interactions at 10 Hz; no free parameters are explicitly named in the abstract, but the density reproduction implies fitting. No invented entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • kinetic model parameters for steady-state density
    The model is stated to yield a distribution that reproduces the observed density profile, implying parameters were adjusted to match data.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Alfven waves from seismic events propagate along geomagnetic field lines and interact resonantly with trapped energetic protons via cyclotron resonance
    This is the core interaction mechanism invoked to link waves to precipitation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5830 in / 1343 out tokens · 19187 ms · 2026-06-27T20:24:33.380468+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The IIT Madras nano-satellite aims to investigate the science of energetic particle precipitation from the inner Van Allen radiation belt into the upper ionosphere as a potential precursor to earthquakes. Precursors in the form of low frequency electromagnetic waves can appear several hours before an earthquake. These waves, captured near the ionosphere magnetosphere transition region, propagate along geomagnetic field lines as Alfven waves and interact resonantly with trapped energetic particles in the radiation belt, causing their precipitation. Such precipitation can be observed by satellites as energetic particle bursts occurring a few hours prior to the earthquake. A numerical study of Alfven wave energetic proton interactions in the inner Van Allen belt is presented here to investigate the energetic proton precipitation and make predictions to support the scientific objective of the IITM satellite mission. A kinetic model of the energetic trapped proton population in the inner belt is developed, yielding a steady-state distribution that reproduces the observed density profile. The Finite Difference Time Domain method is employed to simulate both narrowband seismic event specific emissions and broadband background noise representing magnetohydrodynamic Alfven wave activity in the inner radiation belt. The studies of interactions of narrow-band Alfven wave packets with the energetic protons in the belt reveals that a sharp cyclotron resonance condition arises at a low Alfven frequency 10 Hz, causing substantial precipitation of high energy protons 125 MeV from their stable mirror orbits. This precipitation can be clearly distinguished from background noisy interactions. Based on these results, we predict the optimal satellite orbital altitude for detecting such energetic proton bursts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.18269 by Harishankar Ramachandran, Snehanshu Maiti.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Observed density profile of the radiation belt and its vari￾ation with altitude at the equator. The y-axis represents the density of particles in /cm3 whereas the x-axis represents the geocentric ra￾dius of Earth normalised by the Earth’s radius or the L shell value. Based on the above description, we now develop a kinetic model of high-energy trapped protons in the lower magne￾tosphere. We obtain a steady… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: , constructed using Eq. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Initial energy spectrum of 10000 protons distributed along the L shell 1.5, with KT = 50 MeV. The x-axis shows particle energy in MeV, while the y-axis represents the continuous distribu￾tion function, indicating the number of particles corresponding to each energy value. The initial f(µ) is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Initial magnetic moment distribution of 100000 particles along L shell 1.5. The shape of this distribution is similar to that of the energy distribution function. The initial f(E, µ) for α = 10 is presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Initial f(E,µ) from Eq. 11 and Eq. 16 which is a product of two independent gamma functions. This plot is for KT = 50 MeV and α = 10. The x-axis represents the energy of particles in MeV and the y-axis represents values of µ. yielding the three-dimensional velocity components vx, vy, and vz as: v⊥ = r 2µB m , vx = v⊥ cos ϕ, vy = v⊥ sin ϕ, vz = q v 2 − vx 2 − vy 2 (17) This transformation results in the cor… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Temporal evolution of the number of trapped protons in a magnetic mirror configuration, starting from an initial ensemble of 10,000 particles with a prescribed (E, µ) distribution. As particles bounce between mirror points along the geomagnetic field lines, those with smaller magnetic moment µ (corresponding to larger par￾allel and smaller perpendicular velocities) enter the loss cone and are progressively… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Density distribution for α = 10 along L = 1.5. This profile best reproduces the observed density, with more particles concentrated near the edges of the s coordinate compared to the α = 2 case (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Energy spectrum of 4820 trapped protons at steady state in radiation belt. The x-axis represents energy of particles in MeV and the y-axis represents the number of particles in the corresponding energy bin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Magnetic moment distribution for 4820 trapped protons at steady state in radiation belt. The x-axis represents values of µ. The y-axis represents the number of particles corresponding to each magnetic moment. near the loss-cone boundary is not critical. In this context, the retained ensemble size is adequate for the present anal￾ysis. This is further supported by the steady-state f(E–µ) distribution shown… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Along this L-shell, the Earth’s dipole magnetic field strength reaches a maximum of 25, µT near the magnetic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Mass density, ρm(s) along the L = 1.5 shell in the inner Van Allen radiation belt, shown as a function of arc length s along the field line. The density decreases with increasing altitudes. 3.3. Alfven speed at ´ L = 1.5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Alfven speed, ´ vA(s) along the L = 1.5 shell in the in￾ner Van Allen radiation belt, shown as a function of arc length s along the field line. The wave propagation speed is higher near the magnetic equator and lower near the magnetic poles, indicating dis￾persive behavior along the L-shell. As illustrated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Time snap of a propagating narrowband Gaussian Alfven packet along the L=1.5 shell, with a fixed central frequency ´ of 30 Hz, generated by the current source (see Eqs. 29-30) The sim￾ulation is performed using FDTD methods by discretizing the scalar Alfven wave equation (see Eqs. ´ 27-28) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: presents the contour plot of the Alfven wave packet ´ at a central frequency of 30 Hz, depicted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: presents the dispersion plot of the Alfven wave ´ packet depicted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: presents the contour plot of the Alfven noise de- ´ picted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Time snapshot of a propagating broadband noisy Alfven´ field along the L = 1.5 shell. The wave is composed of multi￾ple low-intensity wave packets, each with randomly chosen fre￾quency, amplitude, spatial width, temporal width, and position, var￾ied around the parameters of Eq. 30, with frequencies uniformly distributed between 5 Hz and 60 Hz. The simulation is performed using FDTD methods by discretizing… view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: presents the dispersion diagram of the broadband Alfven noise depicted in Fig. ´ 19. The dispersion of a 30Hz Alfven wave is for a single wave ´ packet with fixed single central parameters whereas the noisy Alfven wave is a combination of all kinds of wave packets ´ with different frequencies, amplitudes, pulse widths and ini￾tial positions and times. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Number of particles precipitated as a function of the central frequency of a narrowband Gaussian Alfven wave packet. ´ The precipitation peak at 10 Hz is attributed to resonance condition. The results indicate enhanced energetic particle precipita￾tion at a central frequency of 10 Hz, consistent with a reso￾nance condition between energetic protons and Alfven waves ´ in the inner radiation belt. The prese… view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Energy spectrum of particles precipitated due to reso￾nant narrowband Alfven wave interaction. The precipitated parti- ´ cles lie predominantly in the range 100–130 MeV, with a peak at 125 MeV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: The particle undergoes gyro-motion and bounce mo￾tion along the Earth’s magnetic field lines. While the mag￾netic moment varies during individual gyro motions, its av￾erage value remains constant over bounce periods, consistent with adiabatic invariance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_24.png] view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: Magnetic moment of a 125 MeV particle after inter￾action with a resonant narrowband Alfven wave. The particle un- ´ dergoes scattering in µ reflecting pitch-angle changes induced by the Alfven wave, until it becomes untrapped and precipitates. The ´ change in average magnetic moment occurs is seen between time steps 400 and 900. After precipitation, the particle is frozen in the simulation, with its final… view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: Energy spectrum of particles lost due to non-resonant Alfven wave interaction at 40 Hz. The number of precipitated par- ´ ticles is 41, and few particles exceed 100 MeV. In this non-resonant case, only 41 particles are precipi￾tated, significantly fewer than in the resonant case. The en￾ergy spectrum shows minimal particle precipitation above 100 MeV, confirming that resonant interaction is the domi￾nant … view at source ↗
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: Energy spectrum of particles precipitated due to inter￾action with broadband Alfven noise. The spectrum is similar to that ´ of non-resonant narrowband interactions, with minimal loss of high￾energy particles. The results indicate that background broadband Alfven´ noise produces only minor particle loss, with the energy spectrum largely similar to non-resonant interactions. This analysis can be used to di… view at source ↗
Figure 28
Figure 28. Figure 28: Number of particles detected at different altitudes above the ground. The satellite could be placed in the range (750-850) kms. A satellite placed in the 750–850 km range can observe significant particle precipitation due to wave–particle in￾teractions. At higher altitudes, the satellite may be exposed to high-energy particles, which could be damaging, since the iono￾sphere–magnetosphere boundary shifts o… view at source ↗
Figure 29
Figure 29. Figure 29: This figure shows the number of precipitated particles resulting from resonant wave–particle interaction at different alti￾tudes relevant to the IITMSAT mission, evaluated in the energy band around the 125 MeV resonance peak (100–125 MeV). In the numerical simulations, these altitudes represent the lowered loss￾cone (mirror point) precipitation boundary, where particles are con￾sidered lost upon reaching … view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    J.A.Bittencourt , title =

  2. [2]

    William H Press , title=

  3. [3]

    Nithin Sivadas , title =

  4. [4]

    Singer, S. F. , title =. PhysRevLett , volume= 1, year = 1958, pages=

    1958

  5. [5]

    , year = 1962, month = oct, volume =

    Energetic Particles in the Inner Van Allen Belt. , year = 1962, month = oct, volume =. doi:10.1007/BF00240580 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00240580 1962

  6. [6]

    Voronov, S. A. and others , title =. Proc. of 20th ICRC , year =

  7. [7]

    Galper, A. M. and others , title =. Cosmic Res. , volume =

  8. [8]

    Voronov, S. A. and Galper, A. M. and Koldashov, S. V. , title =. Cosmic Research , volume =

  9. [9]

    Fraser-Smith,A.,etal , title =. Geophys. Res. Let , year = 1990, volume = 17, pages =

    1990

  10. [10]

    Freden, S. C. , title =. Space Science Reviews , volume= 9, year = 1992, pages=

    1992

  11. [11]

    and others , title =

    Aleshina, M. and others , title =. Cosmic Research , volume =

  12. [12]

    Cosmic Reseach , year = 1992, volume = 30, pages =

    Galperin, Y , title =. Cosmic Reseach , year = 1992, volume = 30, pages =

    1992

  13. [13]

    Cosmic Research , year = 1992, volume = 32, pages =

    Molchanov , title =. Cosmic Research , year = 1992, volume = 32, pages =

    1992

  14. [14]

    A , title =

    Molchanov, O. A , title =. Annales Geophysicae , year = 1993, volume = 11, pages =

    1993

  15. [15]

    , title =

    Parrot, M. , title =. Physics of the Earth and Interplanetary Interiors , year = 1993, volume = 77, pages =

    1993

  16. [16]

    Advances in Space Research , year = 1995, volume = 15, pages =

    Galper, A , title =. Advances in Space Research , year = 1995, volume = 15, pages =

    1995

  17. [17]

    Geomagnetism and Aeronomy , year = 1996, volume = 35, pages =

    Krechetov, V , title =. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy , year = 1996, volume = 35, pages =

    1996

  18. [18]

    , title =

    Galper, A. , title =. 26th International Cosmic Ray Conference,Salt Lake City, Utah, USA , year = 1999, pages =

    1999

  19. [19]

    Annales Geophysicae , year = 2003, volume = 21, pages =

    Aleksandrin,S , title = ". Annales Geophysicae , year = 2003, volume = 21, pages =

    2003

  20. [20]

    , title = "

    Lysak,B. , title = "

  21. [21]

    , title =

    Bortnik, J. , title =

  22. [22]

    and et al

    Hattori, K. and et al. , title =. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences , year =

  23. [23]

    , title =

    Sgrigna, V. , title =. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics , volume =

  24. [24]

    Physics and Chemistry of the Earth , year = 2006, month = jan, volume =

    Examples of unusual ionospheric observations made by the DEMETER satellite over seismic regions. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth , year = 2006, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1016/j.pce.2006.02.011 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pce.2006.02.011 2006

  25. [25]

    Cosmic Research , keywords =

    Satellite experiment ARINA for studying seismic effects in the high-energy particle fluxes in the Earth's magnetosphere. Cosmic Research , keywords =. doi:10.1134/S0010952507050085 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1134/s0010952507050085

  26. [26]

    Sensors , volume =

    Hayakawa, Masashi and Hattori, Katsumi and Ohta, Kenji , title =. Sensors , volume =. 2007 , doi =

    2007

  27. [27]

    QiuGang, Z. etal. , title =. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences , year = 2008, volume = 51, pages =

    2008

  28. [28]

    Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences , volume =

    Fidani, Cristiano and Battiston, Roberto , title =. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences , volume =. 2008 , doi =

    2008

  29. [29]

    Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences , volume=

    Recent progress on ULF wave and its interactions with energetic particles in the inner magnetosphere , author=. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  30. [30]

    Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Physics , year = 2009, month = apr, volume =

    Observation of solar-magnetospheric and geophysical effects on the electron and proton fluxes detected by the satellite-borne ARINA instrument. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Physics , year = 2009, month = apr, volume =. doi:10.3103/S1062873809030241 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.3103/s1062873809030241 2009

  31. [31]

    , title =

    Fidani, Cristiano and Battiston, Roberto and Burger, William J. , title =. Remote Sensing , volume =. 2010 , doi =

    2010

  32. [32]

    and others , title =

    Athanasious, M. and others , title =. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences , volume =

  33. [33]

    Arjun Bhagoji, Athreya Shankar, Nithin Sivadas , title =

  34. [34]

    Sarkar, Choudhary , title = ". Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci , year = 2012, volume = 12, pages =

    2012

  35. [35]

    and Ma, Y

    Li, X. and Ma, Y. and Wang, P. and Wang, H. and Lu, H. and Zhang, X. and Huang, J. and Shi, F. and Yu, X. and Xu, Y. and others , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , volume =. 2012 , doi =

    2012

  36. [36]

    and Shen, Xuhui and De Santis, Angelo and Yan, Rui and Yang, Y

    Zhima, Zeren and Hu, Yihua and Pierstanti, M. and Shen, Xuhui and De Santis, Angelo and Yan, Rui and Yang, Y. and Zhao, S. and Zhang, Z. and Wang, Q. , title =. Annales Geophysicae , volume =. 2012 , doi =

    2012

  37. [37]

    Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements , volume =

    Bocchini, Roberto and Vassallo, Vincenzo , title =. Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements , volume =. 2013 , doi =

    2013

  38. [38]

    and Fidani, C

    Zhang, X. and Fidani, C. and Huang, J. and Shen, X. and Zhima, Z. and Qian, J. , title =. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences , volume =. 2013 , doi =

    2013

  39. [39]

    , title = "

    Sivadas, N. , title = ". Physics of the Earth and Interplanetary Interiors , year = 2014, volume = 77, pages =

    2014

  40. [40]

    Zhang, Z. X. and Wang, C. Y. and Shen, X. H. and Li, X. Q. and Wu, S. G. , title =. Chinese Physics B , volume =. 2014 , doi =

    2014

  41. [41]

    Journal of Physics Conference Series , year = 2015, series =

    Interrelation between energy and time distributions of high- energy electrons during the observation of the particle bursts in the near-Earth space. Journal of Physics Conference Series , year = 2015, series =. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/632/1/012045 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/632/1/012045 2015

  42. [42]

    High-energy electron bursts in the inner Earth magnetosphere caused by precipitation from radiation belt

    Zharaspayev, T. and Aleksandrin, S. and Galper, A. M. and Koldashov, S. High-energy electron bursts in the inner Earth magnetosphere caused by precipitation from radiation belt. 25th European Cosmic Ray Symposium. 2017. arXiv:1701.04215

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  43. [43]

    Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences , volume =

    Fidani, Cristiano , title =. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences , volume =. 2018 , doi =

    2018

  44. [44]

    A 3D Kinetic Distribution that Yields Observed Plasma Density in the Inner Van Allen Belt

    Maiti, Snehanshu and Ramachandran, Harishankar. A 3D Kinetic Distribution that Yields Observed Plasma Density in the Inner Van Allen Belt. Springer Proc. Phys. 2021. doi:10.1007/978-981-33-4408-2_158

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-33-4408-2_158 2021

  45. [45]

    High Energy Particle Bursts as Seismic Precursors , author=

  46. [46]

    and Zhima, Z

    Yan, R. and Zhima, Z. and Xiong, C. and Shen, X. and Huang, J. and Guan, Y. and Zhu, X. and Liu, C. , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  47. [47]

    Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics , volume =

    Winata, Eresia Nindia and Rosid, Mohammad Syamsu and Febriani, Febty , title =. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  48. [48]

    Chinese Physics B , volume =

    Zhang, Zhenxia and Wang, Lu and Zhima, Zeren and Shen, Xuhui and Chu, Wei and Yan, Rui , title =. Chinese Physics B , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  49. [49]

    and Xiong, C

    Yan, R. and Xiong, C. and Zhima, Z. and Shen, X. and Liu, D. and Liu, C. and Guan, Y. and Zhu, K. and Zheng, L. and Lv, F. , title =. Frontiers in Earth Science , volume =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  50. [50]

    and Huang, J

    Wang, Q. and Huang, J. and Zhao, S. and Zhima, Z. and Yan, R. and Lin, J. and Yang, Y. and Chu, W. and Zhang, Z. and Lu, H. and others , title =. Natural Hazards Research , volume =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  51. [51]

    Remote Sensing , volume =

    Wang, Lu and Zhang, Zhenxia and Zhima, Zeren and Shen, Xuhui and Chu, Wei and Yan, Rui and Guo, Feng and Zhou, Na and Chen, Huaran and Wei, Daihui , title =. Remote Sensing , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  52. [52]

    Remote Sensing , volume =

    Alimoradi, Homayoon and Rahimi, Habib and De Santis, Angelo , title =. Remote Sensing , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    2024