Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 56 references

In a dissipative Kerr parametric oscillator the steady-state density matrix eigenvalues form quasi-degenerate pairs mirroring closed-system spectral kissing, vanishing beyond a critical dissipation.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-27 00:32 UTC pith:UVWJU7ID

load-bearing objection The paper finds a dissipative version of spectral kissing in steady-state density matrix eigenvalues for the KPO, with critical lines from the classical limit, but the weak-dissipation pairing with closed-system levels needs explicit justification. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2606.18348 v1 pith:UVWJU7ID submitted 2026-06-16 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mech

Steady-state spectral kissing and dissipative phase transitions

Devesh Karthik , Jorge Ch\'avez-Carlos , Edson M. Signor , Victor S. Batista , Francisco P\'erez-Bernal , Lea F. Santos This is my paper
classification quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords spectral kissingdissipative phase transitionsKerr parametric oscillatorsteady-state density matrixexcited-state quantum phase transition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper demonstrates that spectral kissing, a feature of excited-state quantum phase transitions in closed systems, has an analog in dissipative systems through the spectrum of the steady-state density matrix. In the weak-dissipation regime, these eigenvalues organize into quasi-degenerate pairs that mirror the energy level merging in the closed Kerr parametric oscillator. With stronger dissipation, the pairs separate and the pairing disappears entirely at a dissipative phase transition. The authors derive analytical expressions for the critical lines separating these regimes by examining the classical limit of the system. A reader would care because it shows how dissipation modifies phase transition signatures in a quantifiable way that can be tracked in the steady state.

Core claim

Using a dissipative Kerr parametric oscillator as example, in the weak-dissipation regime the eigenvalues of the steady-state density matrix organize into quasi-degenerate pairs that mirror the spectral kissing of the corresponding closed system. As the dissipation strength increases this pairing gradually disappears. Analytical expressions for the critical lines governing both the onset of steady-state spectral kissing and its disappearance at a dissipative phase transition are obtained from the classical limit.

What carries the argument

The eigenvalues of the steady-state density matrix, which form quasi-degenerate pairs mirroring closed-system spectral kissing in weak dissipation and lose this structure at a dissipative phase transition.

Load-bearing premise

The weak-dissipation regime is assumed to preserve a direct mirroring between closed-system energy level pairs and steady-state density matrix eigenvalue pairs.

What would settle it

A calculation or measurement where the steady-state eigenvalues fail to show quasi-degenerate pairs in the weak-dissipation regime or do not lose the pairing at the predicted critical dissipation values would falsify the claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The onset of the steady-state spectral kissing occurs at a critical dissipation strength predictable from the classical limit.
  • The pairing of eigenvalues disappears at higher dissipation marking a dissipative phase transition.
  • Both the appearance and disappearance of the pairing are governed by analytically derivable critical lines.
  • The phenomenon is directly encoded in the spectrum of the steady-state density matrix rather than requiring time-dependent analysis.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This mirroring may allow experimental detection of excited-state quantum phase transitions via steady-state measurements in open systems.
  • The classical limit derivation could be applied to predict dissipative transitions in other quantum systems with similar phase transitions.
  • Similar eigenvalue pairing might be observable in other dissipative models of parametric oscillators or related nonlinear systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a dissipative Kerr parametric oscillator (KPO) and claims that, in the weak-dissipation regime, the eigenvalues of the steady-state density matrix form quasi-degenerate pairs that directly mirror the spectral kissing arising from an excited-state quantum phase transition (ESQPT) in the corresponding closed system. As dissipation strength increases, this pairing disappears; analytical expressions for the critical lines separating these regimes are obtained from the classical limit of the dissipative KPO.

Significance. If the claimed correspondence between closed-system level pairs and steady-state density-matrix eigenvalues is rigorously established, the work would identify a dissipative counterpart to ESQPT spectral kissing and supply analytically tractable critical lines. The use of the classical limit to obtain explicit expressions for the onset and disappearance of the pairing is a positive feature.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and weak-dissipation analysis section] The central claim that steady-state density-matrix eigenvalues inherit quasi-degenerate pairs from the closed-system Hamiltonian spectrum (in the weak-dissipation regime) is load-bearing yet rests on an asserted correspondence without an explicit perturbative argument. The Lindblad steady state is a mixture; its eigenvalue spectrum is not automatically guaranteed to track closed-system eigenstate pairs. The classical-limit derivation addresses the critical lines but does not supply the required quantum mapping between the Liouvillian null space and the closed-system eigenstates.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for identifying the need for a more explicit justification of the central correspondence. We address this point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and weak-dissipation analysis section] The central claim that steady-state density-matrix eigenvalues inherit quasi-degenerate pairs from the closed-system Hamiltonian spectrum (in the weak-dissipation regime) is load-bearing yet rests on an asserted correspondence without an explicit perturbative argument. The Lindblad steady state is a mixture; its eigenvalue spectrum is not automatically guaranteed to track closed-system eigenstate pairs. The classical-limit derivation addresses the critical lines but does not supply the required quantum mapping between the Liouvillian null space and the closed-system eigenstates.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript currently relies on numerical demonstration of the quasi-degenerate pairing in the weak-dissipation regime together with the classical-limit derivation of the critical lines, without supplying an explicit perturbative mapping. In the revised version we will expand the weak-dissipation analysis section to include a perturbative treatment of the Liouvillian that relates the structure of its steady-state solution to the closed-system eigenpairs, thereby clarifying why the eigenvalue spectrum of the steady-state density matrix inherits the ESQPT-induced pairing when dissipation is weak. This addition will directly address the concern that a mixed Lindblad steady state does not automatically track the closed-system spectrum. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation relies on independent classical-limit analysis and explicit spectral demonstration

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that weak-dissipation steady-state density-matrix eigenvalues form quasi-degenerate pairs mirroring closed-system spectral kissing—is presented as a demonstrated phenomenon in the dissipative KPO, with critical lines obtained separately from the classical limit. No step reduces a prediction to a fitted input by construction, invokes a self-citation as the sole justification for a uniqueness theorem, or defines the output spectrum in terms of the input spectrum. The mapping is asserted and illustrated rather than forced by re-labeling or self-referential fitting, leaving the derivation self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review prevents exhaustive ledger; the central claim rests on the domain assumption that weak dissipation preserves spectral pairing and that the classical limit yields the critical lines.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Weak-dissipation regime allows eigenvalues of the steady-state density matrix to mirror closed-system spectral kissing
    Stated directly in the abstract as the regime in which the pairing is observed.
  • domain assumption Classical limit of the dissipative KPO supplies analytical expressions for the onset and disappearance of the pairing
    Invoked in the abstract to derive critical lines.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5683 in / 1372 out tokens · 23284 ms · 2026-06-27T00:32:40.822908+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Spectral kissing, recently realized in a Kerr parametric oscillator (KPO), refers to the merging of pairs of energy levels and arises as a manifestation of an excited-state quantum phase transition (ESQPT). Here, we show that this phenomenon has a dissipative counterpart encoded in the spectrum of the steady-state density matrix. Using a dissipative KPO as a representative example, we demonstrate that, in the weak-dissipation regime, the eigenvalues of the steady-state density matrix organize into quasi-degenerate pairs that mirror the spectral kissing of the corresponding closed system. As the dissipation strength increases, this pairing gradually disappears. By analyzing the classical limit of the system, we derive analytical expressions for the critical lines governing both the onset of steady-state spectral kissing and its disappearance at a dissipative phase transition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.18348 by Devesh Karthik, Edson M. Signor, Francisco P\'erez-Bernal, Jorge Ch\'avez-Carlos, Lea F. Santos, Victor S. Batista.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Isolated KPO. (a) Classical phase-space structure of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) shows the phase space flow for κ/K = 2 and ξ = 15, where the red circles denote the stable spi￾ral attractors, the blue circles indicate the minima of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Open KPO for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    N. E. Frattini, R. G. Corti˜ nas, J. Venkatraman, X. Xiao, Q. Su, C. U. Lei, B. J. Chapman, V. R. Joshi, S. M. Girvin, R. J. Schoelkopf, S. Puri, and M. H. Devoret, Ob- servation of pairwise level degeneracies and the quantum regime of the Arrhenius law in a double-well parametric oscillator, Phys. Rev. X14, 031040 (2024)

    2024

  2. [2]

    Ch´ avez-Carlos, T

    J. Ch´ avez-Carlos, T. L. M. Lezama, R. G. Corti˜ nas, J. Venkatraman, M. H. Devoret, V. S. Batista, F. P´ erez- Bernal, and L. F. Santos, Spectral kissing and its dynam- ical consequences in the squeeze-driven Kerr oscillator, npj Quantum Inf.9, 76 (2023)

    2023

  3. [3]

    Cejnar, P

    P. Cejnar, P. Str´ ansk´ y, M. Macek, and M. Kloc, Excited- state quantum phase transitions, J. Phys. A54, 133001 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    Caprio, P

    M. Caprio, P. Cejnar, and F. Iachello, Excited state quan- tum phase transitions in many-body systems, Ann. of Phys.323, 1106 (2008)

    2008

  5. [5]

    Cejnar and P

    P. Cejnar and P. Str´ ansk´ y, Impact of quantum phase transitions on excited-level dynamics, Phys. Rev. E78, 031130 (2008)

    2008

  6. [6]

    P. T. Cochrane, G. J. Milburn, and W. J. Munro, Macro- scopically distinct quantum-superposition states as a bosonic code for amplitude damping, Phys. Rev. A59, 2631 (1999)

    1999

  7. [7]

    Goto, Bifurcation-based adiabatic quantum computa- tion with a nonlinear oscillator network, Scientific Rep

    H. Goto, Bifurcation-based adiabatic quantum computa- tion with a nonlinear oscillator network, Scientific Rep. 6, 21686 (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    S. Puri, S. Boutin, and A. Blais, Engineering the quan- tum states of light in a Kerr-nonlinear resonator by two- photon driving, NPJ Quantum Inf.3, 18 (2017)

    2017

  9. [9]

    Grimm, N

    A. Grimm, N. E. Frattini, S. Puri, S. O. Mundhada, S. Touzard, M. Mirrahimi, S. M. Girvin, S. Shankar, and M. H. Devoret, Stabilization and operation of a Kerr-cat qubit, Nature584, 205 (2020)

    2020

  10. [10]

    Vidal, G

    J. Vidal, G. Palacios, and R. Mosseri, Entanglement in a second-order quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. A 69, 022107 (2004)

    2004

  11. [11]

    Vidal, R

    J. Vidal, R. Mosseri, and J. Dukelsky, Entanglement in a first-order quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. A69, 054101 (2004)

    2004

  12. [12]

    W. D. Heiss, F. G. Scholtz, and H. B. Geyer, The large n behaviour of the Lipkin model and exceptional points, J. Phys. A38, 1843 (2005)

    2005

  13. [14]

    L. F. Santos, M. T´ avora, and F. P´ erez-Bernal, Excited- state quantum phase transitions in many-body systems with infinite-range interaction: Localization, dynamics, and bifurcation, Phys. Rev. A94, 012113 (2016)

    2016

  14. [15]

    Gamito, J

    J. Gamito, J. Khalouf-Rivera, J. M. Arias, P. P´ erez- Fern´ andez, and F. P´ erez-Bernal, Excited-state quantum phase transitions in the anharmonic Lipkin-Meshkov- Glick model: Static aspects, Phys. Rev. E106, 044125 (2022)

    2022

  15. [16]

    Khalouf-Rivera, J

    J. Khalouf-Rivera, J. Gamito, F. P´ erez-Bernal, J. M. Arias, and P. P´ erez-Fern´ andez, Excited-state quantum phase transitions in the anharmonic Lipkin-Meshkov- Glick model: Dynamical aspects, Phys. Rev. E107, 064134 (2023)

    2023

  16. [17]

    H. J. Lipkin, N. Meshkov, and A. J. Glick, Validity of many-body approximation methods for a solvable model: (i). Exact solutions and perturbation theory, Nucl. Phys. 62, 188 (1965)

    1965

  17. [18]

    H. J. Lipkin, N. Meshkov, and A. J. Glick, Validity of many-body approximation methods for a solvable model: (ii). linearization procedures, Nucl. Phys.62, 199 (1965)

    1965

  18. [19]

    H. J. Lipkin, N. Meshkov, and A. J. Glick, Validity of many-body approximation methods for a solvable model: (iii). diagram summations, Nucl. Phys.62, 211 (1965)

    1965

  19. [20]

    P´ erez-Bernal and F

    F. P´ erez-Bernal and F. Iachello, Algebraic approach to two-dimensional systems: Shape phase transitions, mon- odromy, and thermodynamic quantities, Phys. Rev. A 77, 032115 (2008)

    2008

  20. [21]

    Larese and F

    D. Larese and F. Iachello, A study of quantum phase transitions and quantum monodromy in the bending mo- tion of non-rigid molecules, J. Mol. Struct.1006, 611 (2011)

    2011

  21. [22]

    Larese, F

    D. Larese, F. P´ erez-Bernal, and F. Iachello, Signatures of quantum phase transitions and excited state quantum phase transitions in the vibrational bending dynamics of 6 triatomic molecules, J. Mol. Struct.1051, 310 (2013)

    2013

  22. [23]

    Khalouf-Rivera, F

    J. Khalouf-Rivera, F. P´ erez-Bernal, and M. Carvajal, Excited state quantum phase transitions in the bend- ing spectra of molecules, J. Quant. Spectrosc. and Rad. Transfer , 107436 (2020)

    2020

  23. [24]

    Dutta, D

    R. Dutta, D. G. A. Cabral, N. Lyu, N. P. Vu, Y. Wang, B. Allen, X. Dan, R. G. Corti˜ nas, P. Khazaei, M. Sch¨ afer, A. C. C. d. Albornoz, S. E. Smart, S. Nie, M. H. Devoret, D. A. Mazziotti, P. Narang, C. Wang, J. D. Whitfield, A. K. Wilson, H. P. Hendrickson, D. A. Lidar, F. P´ erez- Bernal, L. F. Santos, S. Kais, E. Geva, and V. S. Batista, Simulating c...

    2024

  24. [25]

    Khalouf-Rivera, M

    J. Khalouf-Rivera, M. Carvajal, L. F. Santos, and F. P´ erez-Bernal, Calculation of transition state energies in the HCN-HNC isomerization with an algebraic model, J. Phys. Chem. A123, 9544 (2019)

    2019

  25. [26]

    D. G. A. Cabral, P. Khazaei, B. C. Allen, P. E. Videla, M. Sch¨ afer, R. G. Corti˜ nas, R. Dutta, N. P. Vu, Y. Wang, X. Dan, A. C. C. d. Albornoz, S. E. Smart, S. Nie, M. H. Devoret, D. A. Mazziotti, P. Narang, C. Wang, J. D. Whitfield, A. K. Wilson, H. P. Hendrickson, D. A. Lidar, F. P´ erez-Bernal, L. F. Santos, S. Kais, E. Geva, and V. S. Batista, A ro...

    2024

  26. [27]

    Rafik, J

    A. Rafik, J. Khalouf-Rivera, F. P´ erez-Bernal, K. Marakchi, and M. Carvajal, Phenomenological determination of the isomerization transition state energy of carbonyl sulfide, J. Chem. Phys.163, 184112 (2025)

    2025

  27. [28]

    Str´ ansk´ y, P

    P. Str´ ansk´ y, P. Cejnar, and R. Filip, Stabilization of product states and excited-state quantum phase transi- tions in a coupled qubit-field system, Phys. Rev. A104, 053722 (2021)

    2021

  28. [29]

    A. L. Corps and A. Rela˜ no, Energy cat states induced by a parity-breaking excited-state quantum phase tran- sition, Phys. Rev. A105, 052204 (2022)

    2022

  29. [30]

    L. F. Santos and F. P´ erez-Bernal, Structure of eigenstates and quench dynamics at an excited-state quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. A92, 050101R (2015)

    2015

  30. [31]

    P´ erez-Bernal and L

    F. P´ erez-Bernal and L. F. Santos, Effects of excited state quantum phase transitions on system dynamics, Fortschr. Phys.65, 1600035 (2017)

    2017

  31. [32]

    Pilatowsky-Cameo, J

    S. Pilatowsky-Cameo, J. Ch´ avez-Carlos, M. A. Bastarrachea-Magnani, P. Str´ ansk´ y, S. Lerma- Hern´ andez, L. F. Santos, and J. G. Hirsch, Positive quantum Lyapunov exponents in experimental systems with a regular classical limit, Phys. Rev. E101, 010202 (2020)

    2020

  32. [33]

    Z. Li, S. Colombo, C. Shu, G. Velez, S. Pilatowsky- Cameo, R. Schmied, S. Choi, M. Lukin, E. Pedrozo- Pe˜ nafiel, and V. Vuleti´ c, Improving metrology with quan- tum scrambling, Science380, 1381 (2023)

    2023

  33. [34]

    Instability-Enhanced Quantum Sensing with Tunable Multibody Interactions

    B. Vijaywargia, J. Ch´ avez-Carlos, F. P´ erez-Bernal, and L. F. Santos, Instability-enhanced quantum sensing with tunable multibody interactions (2026), arXiv:2604.05047 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  34. [35]

    C. M. L´ obez and A. Rela˜ no, Entropy, chaos, and excited- state quantum phase transitions in the Dicke model, Phys. Rev. E94, 012140 (2016)

    2016

  35. [36]

    M. Kloc, P. Str´ ansk´ y, and P. Cejnar, Quantum quench dynamics in Dicke superradiance models, Phys. Rev. A 98, 013836 (2018)

    2018

  36. [37]

    Rela˜ no, J

    A. Rela˜ no, J. M. Arias, J. Dukelsky, J. E. Garc´ ıa-Ramos, and P. P´ erez-Fern´ andez, Decoherence as a signature of an excited-state quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. A78, 060102 (2008)

    2008

  37. [38]

    P´ erez-Fern´ andez, A

    P. P´ erez-Fern´ andez, A. Rela˜ no, J. M. Arias, J. Dukel- sky, and J. E. Garc´ ıa-Ramos, Decoherence due to an excited-state quantum phase transition in a two-level bo- son model, Phys. Rev. A80, 032111 (2009)

    2009

  38. [39]

    D. J. Nader, C. A. Gonz´ alez-Rodr´ ıguez, and S. Lerma- Hern´ andez, Avoided crossings and dynamical tunneling close to excited-state quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. E104, 064116 (2021)

    2021

  39. [40]

    Venkatraman, R

    J. Venkatraman, R. G. Corti˜ nas, N. E. Frattini, X. Xiao, and M. H. Devoret, A driven quantum superconduct- ing circuit with multiple tunable degeneracies (2023), arXiv:2211.04605 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  40. [41]

    M. A. P. Reynoso, D. J. Nader, J. Ch´ avez-Carlos, B. E. Ordaz-Mendoza, R. G. Corti˜ nas, V. S. Batista, S. Lerma- Hern´ andez, F. P´ erez-Bernal, and L. F. Santos, Quantum tunneling and level crossings in the squeeze-driven Kerr oscillator, Phys. Rev. A108, 033709 (2023)

    2023

  41. [42]

    M. A. P. Reynoso, E. M. Signor, J. Khalouf-Rivera, A. D. Ribeiro, F. P´ erez-Bernal, and L. F. Santos, Phase tran- sitions, symmetries, and tunneling in kerr parametric os- cillators, Phys. Rev. A112, 032415 (2025)

    2025

  42. [43]

    Prosen and M

    T. Prosen and M. ˇZnidariˇ c, Eigenvalue statistics as an indicator of integrability of nonequilibrium density oper- ators, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 124101 (2013)

    2013

  43. [44]

    Moudgalya, T

    S. Moudgalya, T. Devakul, D. P. Arovas, and S. L. Sondhi, Extension of the eigenstate thermalization hy- pothesis to nonequilibrium steady states, Phys. Rev. B 100, 045112 (2019)

    2019

  44. [45]

    Richter, L

    J. Richter, L. S´ a, and M. Haque, Integrability versus chaos in the steady state of many-body open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. E111, 064103 (2025)

    2025

  45. [46]

    Rubio-Garc´ ıa, A

    A. Rubio-Garc´ ıa, A. L. Corps, A. Rela˜ no, R. A. Molina, F. P´ erez-Bernal, J. E. Garc´ ıa-Ramos, and J. Dukelsky, Exceptional spectral phase in a dissipative collective spin model, Phys. Rev. A106, L010201 (2022)

    2022

  46. [47]

    Iachello, C

    F. Iachello, C. V Coane, and J. Venkatraman, Symme- tries of Liouvillians of squeeze-driven parametric oscilla- tors, J. Phys. A57, 415302 (2024)

    2024

  47. [48]

    E. M. Kessler, G. Giedke, A. Imamoglu, S. F. Yelin, M. D. Lukin, and J. I. Cirac, Dissipative phase transition in a central spin system, Phys. Rev. A86, 012116 (2012)

    2012

  48. [49]

    Horstmann, J

    B. Horstmann, J. I. Cirac, and G. Giedke, Noise-driven dynamics and phase transitions in fermionic systems, Phys. Rev. A87, 012108 (2013)

    2013

  49. [50]

    H. J. Carmichael, Breakdown of photon blockade: A dis- sipative quantum phase transition in zero dimensions, Phys. Rev. X5, 031028 (2015)

    2015

  50. [51]

    Fitzpatrick, N

    M. Fitzpatrick, N. M. Sundaresan, A. C. Y. Li, J. Koch, and A. A. Houck, Observation of a dissipative phase tran- sition in a one-dimensional circuit qed lattice, Phys. Rev. X7, 011016 (2017)

    2017

  51. [52]

    Minganti, A

    F. Minganti, A. Biella, N. Bartolo, and C. Ciuti, Spec- tral theory of liouvillians for dissipative phase transitions, Phys. Rev. A98, 042118 (2018)

    2018

  52. [53]

    Minganti, V

    F. Minganti, V. Savona, and A. Biella, Dissipative phase transitions inn-photon driven quantum nonlinear res- onators, Quantum7, 1170 (2023)

    2023

  53. [54]

    See Supplemental Material

  54. [55]

    A. C. C. de Albornoz, R. G. Corti˜ nas, M. Sch¨ afer, N. E. Frattini, B. Allen, D. G. Cabral, P. E. Videla, P. Khazaei, 7 E. Geva, V. S. Batista, and M. H. Devoret, Asymmetry control in a parametric oscillator for the quantum simu- lation of chemical activation, PRX Quantum7, 020309 (2026)

    2026

  55. [56]

    Minganti, N

    F. Minganti, N. Bartolo, J. Lolli, W. Casteels, and C. Ciuti, Exact results for Schr¨ odinger cats in driven- dissipative systems and their feedback control, Sci. Rep. 6, 26987 (2016)

    2016

  56. [57]

    Roberts and A

    D. Roberts and A. A. Clerk, Driven-dissipative quantum Kerr resonators: New exact solutions, photon blockade and quantum bistability, Phys. Rev. X10, 021022 (2020). Supplemental Material: Steady-state spectral kissing and dissipative phase transition Devesh Karthik1, Jorge Ch´ avez-Carlos2, Edson Signor 1, Victor S. Batista 3,4, Francisco P´ erez-Bernal5,...

    2020