The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2606.19844 · v1 · pith:4KK7SKUL · submitted 2026-06-18 · cond-mat.soft · physics.bio-ph

Epithelia Realize Nematopolar Topological Defect Structures

Tianxiang Ma , Niels de Graaf Sousa , Valeriia Grudtsyna , Farzan Vafa , Amin Doostmohammadi This is my paper

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel 2026-06-26 15:58 UTCgrok-4.3pith:4KK7SKULrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cond-mat.soft physics.bio-ph
keywords epithelial monolayerstopological defectspolar order parameternematic orderactive mattertraction force microscopycell mechanicssubstrate stiffness
0
0 comments X

The pith

Epithelial monolayers form a mixed polar-nematic phase with both integer and half-integer topological defects.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a shape-based polar order parameter to quantify structural asymmetry among cells in epithelial monolayers. This parameter unifies measurements of nematic directors, principal stresses, and cell motion obtained from bright-field imaging and traction force microscopy. The tissue is shown to organize into a mixed phase containing both integer and half-integer defects, with domain walls binding like-signed half-integer defects. Perturbations of substrate stiffness and cell-cell adhesion change defect density and domain-wall length. A minimal continuum model of polar-nematic active matter reproduces the mixed phase as the result of coupled active stresses and elastic interactions.

Core claim

By defining a shape-based polar order parameter, the study shows that epithelial monolayers exhibit a mixed polar-nematic phase with coexisting ±1 and ±1/2 defects. Traction force microscopy and imaging reveal that this polarity integrates nematic directors, principal stresses, and cell motion. Perturbations demonstrate that substrate stiffness and cell-cell adhesion control defect density and domain wall lengths between like-signed defects. A continuum model attributes the mixed phase to the interplay between active stresses and polar-nematic elasticity, providing evidence that epithelia function as nematopolar matter.

What carries the argument

The shape-based polar order parameter, which captures cell structural asymmetry and serves as a unifying biomechanical metric for nematic directors, principal stresses, and cellular motion.

If this is right

  • Substrate stiffness modulates the density of coexisting integer and half-integer defects.
  • Cell-cell adhesion strength controls the length of domain walls that bind like-signed positive half-integer defects.
  • The mixed phase is produced by the interplay of active stresses and polar-nematic elasticity.
  • Shape polarity provides a single metric that combines nematic, stress, and motion information in the tissue.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The nematopolar description could be used to predict how defects influence collective cell migration during wound closure.
  • Similar shape-based metrics might be applied to other active monolayers such as endothelial or bacterial films to test for mixed-order phases.
  • Pharmacological reduction of actomyosin contractility could be used to decouple polar and nematic contributions and test the model's elasticity terms.

Load-bearing premise

The shape-based polar order parameter is assumed to faithfully integrate nematic directors, principal stresses, and cellular motion without introducing independent artifacts.

What would settle it

An independent dataset in which measured cell-shape asymmetry fails to correlate with simultaneously recorded nematic directors or traction-force patterns would falsify the claim that the parameter unifies these quantities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.19844 by Amin Doostmohammadi, Farzan Vafa, Niels de Graaf Sousa, Tianxiang Ma, Valeriia Grudtsyna.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: A): aster, spirals and vortices characterized by the polarization orientation or ψ [40]. This coexistence arises because the system operates in the flow-tumbling regime, where no defect configuration is stationary. Discussion.– Even though individual cells are polar objects, tissue-scale dynamics are often interpreted through nematic order parameters derived from cell elongation. Here, by defining a shape-… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We introduce a shape-based polar order parameter that captures the structural asymmetry of cells within epithelial monolayers. By combining bright-field imaging and traction force microscopy, we demonstrate that shape polarity serves as a unifying biomechanical metric, integrating the physical information encoded by nematic directors, principal stresses, and cellular motion. Furthermore, we show that the tissue organizes into a mixed polar-nematic phase, characterized by the coexistence of integer ($\pm 1$) and half-integer ($\pm 1/2$) defects. Through mechanical perturbations, we demonstrate that both substrate stiffness and cell-cell adhesion modulate the density of these excitations and the length of domain walls binding like-signed positive half-integer defects. Using a minimal continuum model of polar-nematic active matter, we establish that this mixed phase is fundamentally driven by the interplay of active stresses and polar-nematic elasticity. These findings provide a direct experimental evidence that epithelial monolayers behave as nematopolar matter, in which coupled polar and nematic elastic interactions jointly shape the active state

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a shape-based polar order parameter extracted from bright-field cell outlines in epithelial monolayers. Combining this with traction force microscopy, the authors report that shape polarity unifies nematic directors, principal stresses, and cellular motion. They observe a mixed polar-nematic phase containing both integer (±1) and half-integer (±1/2) topological defects, with defect densities and domain-wall lengths modulated by substrate stiffness and cell-cell adhesion. A minimal continuum model of polar-nematic active matter is used to argue that the mixed phase arises from the interplay of active stresses and polar-nematic elasticity, leading to the claim that epithelial monolayers realize nematopolar matter.

Significance. If the shape-based polar order parameter functions as an independent metric free of segmentation artifacts, the work would supply direct evidence that coupled polar-nematic elasticity governs defect statistics and active mechanics in epithelia. The combination of mechanical perturbations with a minimal continuum model is a strength; reproducible code or parameter-free predictions would further strengthen the result.

major comments (2)
  1. [Order-parameter construction section] The construction of the shape-based polar order parameter (described in the section on order-parameter definition) relies on the same bright-field cell-boundary segmentation used to extract nematic directors. No explicit controls are presented to demonstrate that observed alignments with traction-force data or defect statistics are independent of shared imaging or segmentation artifacts (e.g., density variations or boundary-detection noise). This is load-bearing for the central claim that shape polarity serves as a unifying biomechanical metric.
  2. [Continuum model section] In the continuum-model section, the minimal polar-nematic active-matter equations are stated to be parameter-free in their qualitative predictions, yet the reported defect densities and domain-wall lengths appear to require fitting of at least the ratio of polar to nematic elastic constants and the active-stress magnitude. It is unclear whether these parameters are fixed a priori or adjusted post-hoc to match the observed mixed-phase statistics.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure captions] Figure captions for the defect-density plots should explicitly state the number of independent monolayers and fields of view analyzed, together with the statistical test used to claim modulation by stiffness or adhesion.
  2. [Model section] The abstract states that the mixed phase is 'fundamentally driven by the interplay of active stresses and polar-nematic elasticity,' but the model section does not include a direct comparison of the minimal model against a purely nematic or purely polar control case.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and insightful comments, which have helped us identify areas for clarification and improvement. We address each major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Order-parameter construction section] The construction of the shape-based polar order parameter (described in the section on order-parameter definition) relies on the same bright-field cell-boundary segmentation used to extract nematic directors. No explicit controls are presented to demonstrate that observed alignments with traction-force data or defect statistics are independent of shared imaging or segmentation artifacts (e.g., density variations or boundary-detection noise). This is load-bearing for the central claim that shape polarity serves as a unifying biomechanical metric.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the polar order parameter and nematic directors are both extracted from bright-field cell outlines via the same segmentation pipeline, raising the possibility of shared artifacts. The polar order parameter is constructed from the vectorial asymmetry of cell shape (distinct from the traceless nematic tensor), and its correlations with independent traction-force microscopy measurements—which do not depend on segmentation—provide supporting evidence that the alignments reflect physical coupling rather than imaging artifacts. Nevertheless, we agree that explicit robustness checks were not included. In the revised manuscript we will add supplementary analyses that vary segmentation thresholds, introduce controlled boundary noise, and subsample cell-density variations to demonstrate that the reported alignments, defect statistics, and domain-wall lengths remain stable. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Continuum model section] In the continuum-model section, the minimal polar-nematic active-matter equations are stated to be parameter-free in their qualitative predictions, yet the reported defect densities and domain-wall lengths appear to require fitting of at least the ratio of polar to nematic elastic constants and the active-stress magnitude. It is unclear whether these parameters are fixed a priori or adjusted post-hoc to match the observed mixed-phase statistics.

    Authors: The minimal model demonstrates that the mixed polar-nematic phase—with coexistence of integer and half-integer defects and domain walls—is a generic consequence of active-stress coupling to distinct polar and nematic elasticities; this qualitative feature is robust across a wide range of parameter values and does not require fine-tuning. Quantitative matching of measured defect densities and domain-wall lengths does involve selecting the ratio of elastic constants and the active-stress magnitude within physically plausible bounds. We will revise the manuscript to explicitly distinguish the parameter-independent qualitative predictions from the quantitative fitting procedure, report the specific parameter values employed, and justify them against independent experimental estimates of epithelial elasticity and contractility. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper introduces a shape-based polar order parameter from bright-field cell outlines and correlates it experimentally with nematic directors, principal stresses, and motion via TFM. It reports mixed integer/half-integer defects modulated by substrate stiffness and adhesion, then invokes a minimal continuum model of polar-nematic active matter to attribute the phase to active stresses plus elasticity. No equations are supplied that reduce any reported defect density or correlation to a fitted parameter by construction, and no self-citations are used to import uniqueness theorems or ansatzes. The order-parameter construction and model are presented as independent of the target statistics, rendering the chain self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies insufficient detail to enumerate free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the central claim rests on the unverified assumption that the introduced shape-polarity metric is a faithful integrator of existing observables.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5719 in / 1253 out tokens · 18791 ms · 2026-06-26T15:58:59.582274+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Epithelia Realize Nematopolar Topological Defect Structures

    [9]. In contrast, polar systems, whose order parameter is a vector field⃗ p, minimize their elastic energy by forming integer topological charged defects (s=±1) [10, 11]. A striking feature of biological active matter is that constituent agents such as migrating cells or motile bacteria [4, 12, 13], are inherently polar, yet their collective dynamics are ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Doostmohammadi, J

    A. Doostmohammadi, J. Ign´ es-Mullol, J. M. Yeomans, and F. Sagu´ es, Active nematics, Nature communications 9, 3246 (2018)

    2018

  3. [3]

    Mart´ ınez-Prat, J

    B. Mart´ ınez-Prat, J. Ign´ es-Mullol, J. Casademunt, and F. Sagu´ es, Selection mechanism at the onset of active turbulence, Nature physics15, 362 (2019)

    2019

  4. [4]

    Dunkel, S

    J. Dunkel, S. Heidenreich, K. Drescher, H. H. Wensink, M. B¨ ar, and R. E. Goldstein, Fluid dynamics of bacterial turbulence, Physical review letters110, 228102 (2013)

    2013

  5. [5]

    T. B. Saw, A. Doostmohammadi, V. Nier, L. Kocgozlu, S. Thampi, Y. Toyama, P. Marcq, C. T. Lim, J. M. Yeomans, and B. Ladoux, Topological defects in epithelia govern cell death and extrusion, Nature544, 212 (2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, R

    C. P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, R. Alert, C. Blanch-Mercader, M. G´ omez-Gonz´ alez, T. Kolodziej, E. Bazellieres, J. Casademunt, and X. Trepat, Active wetting of epithelial tissues, Nature physics15, 79 (2019)

    2019

  7. [7]

    Maroudas-Sacks, L

    Y. Maroudas-Sacks, L. Garion, L. Shani-Zerbib, A. Livshits, E. Braun, and K. Keren, Topological defects in the nematic order of actin fibres as organization centres of hydra morphogenesis, Nature Physics17, 251 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    Guillamat, C

    P. Guillamat, C. Blanch-Mercader, G. Pernollet, K. Kruse, and A. Roux, Integer topological defects organize stresses driving tissue morphogenesis, Nature materials21, 588 (2022)

    2022

  9. [9]

    Shankar, A

    S. Shankar, A. Souslov, M. J. Bowick, M. C. Marchetti, and V. Vitelli, Topological active matter, Nature Reviews Physics4, 380 (2022)

    2022

  10. [10]

    Giomi, M

    L. Giomi, M. J. Bowick, P. Mishra, R. Sknepnek, and M. Cristina Marchetti, Defect dynamics in active nematics, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences372, 20130365 (2014)

    2014

  11. [11]

    Juelicher, K

    F. Juelicher, K. Kruse, J. Prost, and J.-F. Joanny, Active behavior of the cytoskeleton, Physics reports449, 3 (2007)

    2007

  12. [12]

    Rønning, J

    J. Rønning, J. Renaud, A. Doostmohammadi, and L. Angheluta, Spontaneous flows and dynamics of full- integer topological defects in polar active matter, Soft Matter19, 7513 (2023)

    2023

  13. [13]

    E. Han, C. Fei, R. Alert, K. Copenhagen, M. D. Koch, N. S. Wingreen, and J. W. Shaevitz, Local polar order controls mechanical stress and triggers layer formation in myxococcus xanthus colonies, Nature communications 16, 952 (2025)

    2025

  14. [14]

    M. C. Weiger, V. Vedham, C. H. Stuelten, K. Shou, M. Herrera, M. Sato, W. Losert, and C. A. Parent, Real-time motion analysis reveals cell directionality as an indicator of breast cancer progression, PloS one8, e58859 (2013)

    2013

  15. [15]

    Venkatesh, N

    V. Venkatesh, N. de Graaf Sousa, and A. Doostmohammadi, The interplay of polar and nematic order in active matter: implications for non- equilibrium physics and biology, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical58, 263001 (2025)

    2025

  16. [16]

    Giese, J

    W. Giese, J. P. Albrecht, O. Oppenheim, E. B. Akmeri¸ c, J. Kraxner, D. Schmidt, K. Harrington, and H. Gerhardt, Polarity-jam: an image analysis toolbox for cell polarity, junction and morphology quantification, Nature Communications16, 1474 (2025)

    2025

  17. [17]

    Bera and D

    S. Bera and D. Loeffler, Cell polarity: cell type-specific regulators, common pathways, and polarized vesicle transport, Leukemia39, 1558 (2025)

    2025

  18. [18]

    Denk and E

    J. Denk and E. Frey, Pattern-induced local symmetry breaking in active-matter systems, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117, 31623 (2020)

    2020

  19. [19]

    Roostalu, J

    J. Roostalu, J. Rickman, C. Thomas, F. N´ ed´ elec, and T. Surrey, Determinants of polar versus nematic organization in networks of dynamic microtubules and mitotic motors, Cell175, 796 (2018)

    2018

  20. [20]

    Huber, R

    L. Huber, R. Suzuki, T. Kr¨ uger, E. Frey, and A. Bausch, Emergence of coexisting ordered states in active matter systems, Science361, 255 (2018)

    2018

  21. [21]

    Vafa and A

    F. Vafa and A. Doostmohammadi, Phase diagram, confining strings, and a new universality class in nematopolar matter, Europhysics Letters152, 57002 6 (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    P. K. Mishra, P. S. Mondal, P. Jena, and S. Mishra, String formation and arrested ordering kinetics in nematics induced by polar particles, New Journal of Physics27, 074602 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    Dinelli, L

    A. Dinelli, L. Dumoulin, and K. Kruse, Active topological strings in renewing nematopolar fluids, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.18307 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    Paik and J

    L. Paik and J. V. Selinger, Theory of hybrid defects, with coupled orientational order parameters, on flat and curved surfaces, Soft Matter (2026)

    2026

  25. [25]

    K. G. Wilson, Confinement of quarks, Physical Review D10, 2445 (1974)

    1974

  26. [26]

    D. H. Lee and G. Grinstein, Strings in two-dimensional classical xy models, Phys. Rev. Lett.55, 541 (1985)

    1985

  27. [27]

    Strings and topological defects govern ordering kinetics in endothelial cell layers, Nature Physics21, 1629 (2025)

    2025

  28. [28]

    D. T. Tambe, C. Corey Hardin, T. E. Angelini, K. Rajendran, C. Y. Park, X. Serra-Picamal, E. H. Zhou, M. H. Zaman, J. P. Butler, D. A. Weitz,et al., Collective cell guidance by cooperative intercellular forces, Nature materials10, 469 (2011)

    2011

  29. [29]

    V. Nier, S. Jain, C. T. Lim, S. Ishihara, B. Ladoux, and P. Marcq, Inference of internal stress in a cell monolayer, Biophysical journal110, 1625 (2016)

    2016

  30. [30]

    Anger, A

    L. Anger, A. Schoenit, F. Wodrascka, C. Ross´ e, R.- M. M` ege, B. Ladoux, and P. Marcq, Tissue stress measurements with bayesian inversion stress microscopy, The European Physical Journal E49, 2 (2026)

    2026

  31. [31]

    Mayor and C

    R. Mayor and C. Carmona-Fontaine, Keeping in touch with contact inhibition of locomotion, Trends in cell biology20, 319 (2010)

    2010

  32. [32]

    Intrinsic stochasticity in cell polarity and contact inhibition of locomotion

    M. Kryvoruchko and B. A. Camley, Intrinsic stochasticity in cell polarity and contact inhibition of locomotion, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.18851 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    Giomi, M

    L. Giomi, M. J. Bowick, X. Ma, and M. C. Marchetti, Defect annihilation and proliferation in active nematics, Physical review letters110, 228101 (2013)

    2013

  34. [34]

    Amiri, R

    A. Amiri, R. Mueller, and A. Doostmohammadi, Unifying polar and nematic active matter: emergence and co-existence of half-integer and full-integer topological defects, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical55, 094002 (2022)

    2022

  35. [35]

    J. V. Selinger,Introduction to Topological Defects and Solitons: In Liquid Crystals, Magnets, and Related Materials, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 1032 (Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024)

    2024

  36. [36]

    Shankar, S

    S. Shankar, S. Ramaswamy, M. C. Marchetti, and M. J. Bowick, Defect unbinding in active nematics, Physical review letters121, 108002 (2018)

    2018

  37. [37]

    F. Vafa, M. J. Bowick, M. C. Marchetti, and B. I. Shraiman, Multi-defect dynamics in active nematics, arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.02947 (2020)

    work page arXiv 2007

  38. [38]

    F. Vafa, D. R. Nelson, and A. Doostmohammadi, Periodic orbits, pair nucleation, and unbinding of active nematic defects on cones, Physical Review E109, 064606 (2024)

    2024

  39. [39]

    Kruse, J.-F

    K. Kruse, J.-F. Joanny, F. J¨ ulicher, J. Prost, and K. Sekimoto, Asters, vortices, and rotating spirals in active gels of polar filaments, Physical review letters92, 078101 (2004)

    2004

  40. [40]

    Kruse, J.-F

    K. Kruse, J.-F. Joanny, F. J¨ ulicher, J. Prost, and K. Sekimoto, Generic theory of active polar gels: a paradigm for cytoskeletal dynamics, The European Physical Journal E16, 5 (2005)

    2005

  41. [41]

    Elgeti, M

    J. Elgeti, M. Cates, and D. Marenduzzo, Defect hydrodynamics in 2d polar active fluids, Soft Matter7, 3177 (2011)

    2011

  42. [42]

    Friedl and D

    P. Friedl and D. Gilmour, Collective cell migration in morphogenesis, regeneration and cancer, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology10, 445 (2009)

    2009

  43. [43]

    S. J. Stehbens, E. Scarpa, and M. D. White, Perspectives in collective cell migration – moving forward, Journal of Cell Science137, jcs261549 (2024)

    2024

  44. [44]

    K. J. Cheung and S. Horne-Badovinac, Collective cell migration modes in development, tissue repair and cancer, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology26, 741 (2025)

    2025

  45. [45]

    Peglion and S

    F. Peglion and S. Etienne-Manneville, Cell polarity changes in cancer initiation and progression, Journal of Cell Biology223, e202308069 (2024)

    2024

  46. [46]

    Duclos, S

    G. Duclos, S. Garcia, H. Yevick, and P. Silberzan, Perfect nematic order in confined monolayers of spindle-shaped cells, Soft matter10, 2346 (2014)

    2014

  47. [47]

    Gruler and R

    H. Gruler and R. Nuccitelli, Neural crest cell taxis: any difference between chemotaxis and galvanotaxis?, European Biophysics Journal19, 1 (1991)

    1991

  48. [48]

    S. Chen, M. Ricci, A. P. Tabatabai, Z. G. Sun, S. Witthaus, S. Shankar, M. Nitzan, and M. P. Murrell, Topological control of spontaneous failure in active nematic solids, Nature Materials , 1 (2026)

    2026

  49. [49]

    Li, The image stabilizer plugin for imagej, https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~kangli/code/Image_ Stabilizer.html(2008)

    K. Li, The image stabilizer plugin for imagej, https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~kangli/code/Image_ Stabilizer.html(2008)

    2008

  50. [50]

    Thielicke, Pivlab –towards user friendly, affordable and accurate digital particle image velocimetry in matlab, Journal of Open Research Software2, 30 (2014)

    W. Thielicke, Pivlab –towards user friendly, affordable and accurate digital particle image velocimetry in matlab, Journal of Open Research Software2, 30 (2014)

    2014

  51. [51]

    Balasubramaniam, A

    L. Balasubramaniam, A. Doostmohammadi, T. B. Saw, G. H. N. S. Narayana, R. Mueller, T. Dang, M. Thomas, S. Gupta, S. Sonam, A. S. Yap,et al., Investigating the nature of active forces in tissues reveals how contractile cells can form extensile monolayers, Nature materials20, 1156 (2021)

    2021

  52. [52]

    Stringer, T

    C. Stringer, T. Wang, M. Michaelos, and M. Pachitariu, Cellpose: a generalist algorithm for cellular segmentation, Nature methods18, 100 (2021)

    2021

  53. [53]

    Brauns, M

    F. Brauns, M. O’Leary, A. Hernandez, M. J. Bowick, and M. C. Marchetti, Active solids: Topological defect self- propulsion without flow, Physical Review Letters136, 058302 (2026)

    2026

  54. [54]

    Blanch-Mercader, V

    C. Blanch-Mercader, V. Yashunsky, S. Garcia, G. Duclos, L. Giomi, and P. Silberzan, Turbulent dynamics of epithelial cell cultures, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 208101 (2018)

    2018

  55. [55]

    P. W. Miller, D. Fortunato, C. Muratov, L. Greengard, and S. Shvartsman, Forced and spontaneous symmetry breaking in cell polarization, Nature computational science2, 504 (2022)

    2022

  56. [56]

    Bailleul, N

    R. Bailleul, N. Cuny, D. Khoromskaia, S. Basu, G. Bergamini, P. Cucurachi, F. Gabler, S. Rupp, A. Guse, C. Curantz,et al., Deciphering mechanical determinants of morphological evolution, Cell189, 2598 (2026). 7 Appendix A: Model and Simulation Details We employ a general framework to describe the dynamics of the polarity field⃗ p(r, t) of particles in an ...

    2026

  57. [57]

    HereEandω are the strain and vorticity tensors, respectively

    The equation for polarization is given by [10], ∂t⃗ p+⃗ v· ∇⃗ p+ω·⃗ p=1 γ ⃗h−λE·⃗ p,(A1) whereγis the rotational viscosity that controls relaxation of the polarity field to the minimum of the free energy through the molecular field ⃗h=− δF[⃗ p] δ⃗ p . HereEandω are the strain and vorticity tensors, respectively. The dynamics of the velocity are governed b...