pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20462 · v1 · pith:4MCLK4NAnew · submitted 2026-06-18 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· cond-mat.stat-mech

Polymer-polymer interdiffusion: effects of entanglements and a polymeric source

Avraham Moriel , Howard A. Stone This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 15:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.stat-mech
keywords polymer interdiffusionentanglementspolymeric sourcetwo-fluid formalismself-similar solutionsdiffusion frontsnonlinear transport
0
0 comments X

The pith

A polymeric source breaks self-similarity in polymer interdiffusion but leaves the diffusion front's spatial structure unchanged.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates polymer-polymer interdiffusion both with and without a polymeric source, covering unentangled and entangled regimes. A two-fluid formalism yields scaling relations, self-similar reductions, and analytical solutions that are verified against one- and two-dimensional numerical simulations. Although the source alters boundary conditions and removes self-similarity, the advancing front of the diffusing droplet retains similar spatial features to the source-free case. This finding applies directly to mixing processes in industrial and biological settings where continuous polymer production occurs.

Core claim

Utilizing a two-fluid formalism, scaling relations, self-similar reductions, and analytical solutions are derived for polymer-polymer interdiffusion in the absence or presence of a polymeric source, for both unentangled and entangled scenarios. These predictions are confirmed with one- and two-dimensional numerical simulations. The introduction of a source term breaks the self-similar structure and modifies the boundary conditions and domain of integration, yet the front characteristics of the diffusing droplet exhibit similar spatial structures as in the absence of a source.

What carries the argument

Two-fluid formalism applied to entangled and unentangled polymer interdiffusion, producing scaling relations and self-similar solutions whose front structures persist after a source is added.

If this is right

  • Scaling relations and analytical solutions describe interdiffusion dynamics in both source-free and source-driven cases.
  • Numerical simulations in one and two dimensions confirm the derived scaling and front structures.
  • The source modifies boundary conditions and integration domain but does not alter the spatial structure of the diffusion front.
  • The same front similarity holds for both unentangled and entangled polymer regimes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The robustness of front structure suggests the model could be extended to predict mixing rates in source-driven biological subcellular environments.
  • Similar front behavior may allow simplified boundary-condition treatments even when sources are active.
  • The approach could be tested in three-dimensional geometries to check whether front similarity survives added dimensionality.

Load-bearing premise

The two-fluid formalism remains valid for describing the dynamics when entanglements and a polymeric source are both present.

What would settle it

A simulation or experiment that measures the spatial profile of the diffusion front in an entangled polymer system and finds that the profile changes measurably when a continuous polymeric source is introduced.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.20462 by Avraham Moriel, Howard A. Stone.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Passive (droplet) diffusion, and source-driven diffusion. (a) A sketch of an A-mer droplet interdiffusing into a B-mer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Numerical and analytical solutions for unentangled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Numerical and analytical solutions for unentangled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Numerical solutions for unentangled and entangled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Numerical solutions and analytical approximation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Numerical solutions for unentangled and entan [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Many industrial applications and biological scenarios involve the interdiffusion of two polymeric species. Motivated by biological subcellular source-driven processes, we study polymer-polymer interdiffusion problems in the absence or the presence of a polymeric source, for both unentangled and entangled scenarios. Utilizing a two-fluid formalism, we arrive at scaling relations, self-similar reductions, and analytical solutions, which are confirmed with one- and two-dimensional numerical simulations. The introduction of a source term breaks the self-similar structure, modifying the boundary conditions and the domain of integration. Nevertheless, we show that the front characteristics of the diffusing droplet exhibit similar spatial structures as in the absence of a source. Our results allow deeper understanding of polymer-polymer interdiffusion and nonlinear transport, especially in the presence of a source.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies the standard two-fluid formalism to polymer-polymer interdiffusion for unentangled and entangled cases, deriving scaling relations, self-similar reductions, and analytical solutions both without and with an explicit polymeric source term. It reports that the source breaks self-similarity and modifies boundary conditions and integration domains, yet the front characteristics of the diffusing droplet retain similar spatial structures; these analytical results are stated to be confirmed by 1D and 2D numerical simulations.

Significance. If the derivations and numerical confirmations hold, the work offers a useful extension of conventional two-fluid modeling to source-driven polymer interdiffusion, with direct relevance to biological subcellular processes and industrial applications involving nonlinear transport. The explicit treatment of how a source alters self-similarity while preserving front structure provides a concrete, testable framework that could guide further analytical and simulation studies in soft-matter physics.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that 'analytical solutions... are confirmed with one- and two-dimensional numerical simulations' would be strengthened by a brief indication of the quantitative measures of agreement (e.g., relative error on front position or concentration profiles) or reference to the specific figures that demonstrate the comparison.
  2. The manuscript notes post-hoc adjustments to integration domains after source introduction; a short clarification on how these adjustments are implemented and their effect on the reported front characteristics would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our work and for recommending minor revision. The report contains no specific major comments to address.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses standard two-fluid equations

full rationale

The manuscript starts from the established two-fluid formalism for polymer mixtures, introduces an explicit source term, derives scaling relations and self-similar solutions for unentangled/entangled cases, and verifies them with 1D/2D simulations. The source is shown to break self-similarity while preserving front structure. No equation reduces to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, no self-citation chain carries the central claim, and no ansatz is smuggled in; all reductions follow directly from the stated PDEs and boundary conditions without circular redefinition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the central claims rest on the applicability of the two-fluid formalism to entangled polymer dynamics and on the numerical methods used for validation; no explicit free parameters or invented entities are named.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Two-fluid formalism accurately captures polymer-polymer interdiffusion for both entangled and unentangled regimes
    Invoked to arrive at scaling relations and analytical solutions
  • domain assumption Numerical simulations in 1D and 2D provide independent confirmation of the analytical results
    Used to validate the derived expressions

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5671 in / 1289 out tokens · 19101 ms · 2026-06-26T15:13:28.873445+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references

  1. [1]

    P. G. de Gennes,Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics (Cornell University Press, 1979)

    1979

  2. [2]

    Rubinstein and R

    M. Rubinstein and R. H. Colby,Polymer Physics(Oxford University Press, 2003)

    2003

  3. [3]

    Doi and S

    M. Doi and S. F. Edwards,The Theory of Polymer Dy- namics(Oxford University Press, 1988)

    1988

  4. [4]

    P. G. de Gennes, Dynamics of fluctuations and spinodal decomposition in polymer blends, J. Chem. Phys.72, 4756 (1980)

    1980

  5. [5]

    Pincus, Dynamics of fluctuations and spinodal decom- position in polymer blends

    P. Pincus, Dynamics of fluctuations and spinodal decom- position in polymer blends. ii, J. Chem. Phys.75, 1996 (1981)

    1996

  6. [6]

    Doi and S

    M. Doi and S. F. Edwards, Dynamics of concentrated polymer systems. part 1.—brownian motion in the equi- librium state, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans.74, 1789 (1978)

    1978

  7. [7]

    Doi and S

    M. Doi and S. F. Edwards, Dynamics of concentrated polymer systems. part 2.—molecular motion under flow, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans.74, 1802 (1978)

    1978

  8. [8]

    Doi and S

    M. Doi and S. F. Edwards, Dynamics of concentrated polymer systems. part 3.—the constitutive equation, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans.74, 1818 (1978)

    1978

  9. [9]

    Brochard, J

    F. Brochard, J. Jouffroy, and P. Levinson, Polymer- polymer diffusion in melts, Macromolecules16, 1638 (1983)

    1983

  10. [10]

    Brochard-Wyart, Kinetics of polymer-polymer inter- diffusion, inFundamentals of Adhesion(Springer, 1991) pp

    F. Brochard-Wyart, Kinetics of polymer-polymer inter- diffusion, inFundamentals of Adhesion(Springer, 1991) pp. 181–206

    1991

  11. [11]

    P. F. Green and E. J. Kramer, Diffusion in polymer alloy melts, MRS Bull.12, 42 (1987)

    1987

  12. [12]

    E. A. Jordan, R. C. Ball, A. M. Donald, L. J. Fet- ters, R. A. L. Jones, and J. Klein, Mutual diffusion in blends of long and short entangled polymer chains, Macromolecules21, 235 (1988)

    1988

  13. [13]

    Brochard and P

    F. Brochard and P. G. de Gennes, Polymer-polymer in- terdiffusion, EPL1, 221 (1986)

    1986

  14. [14]

    H. H. Kausch and M. Tirrell, Polymer interdiffusion, Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci.19, 341 (1989)

    1989

  15. [15]

    Klein, The interdiffusion of polymers, Science250, 640 (1990)

    J. Klein, The interdiffusion of polymers, Science250, 640 (1990)

    1990

  16. [16]

    P. G. de Gennes, Reptation of a polymer chain in the presence of fixed obstacles, J. Chem. Phys.55, 572 (1971)

    1971

  17. [17]

    Klein, Evidence for reptation in an entangled polymer melt, Nature271, 143 (1978)

    J. Klein, Evidence for reptation in an entangled polymer melt, Nature271, 143 (1978)

    1978

  18. [18]

    Russell, V

    T. Russell, V. Deline, W. Dozier, G. Felcher, G. Agrawal, R. Wool, and J. Mays, Direct observation of reptation at polymer interfaces, Nature365, 235 (1993)

    1993

  19. [19]

    C. P. Brangwynne, P. Tompa, and R. V. Pappu, Polymer physics of intracellular phase transitions, Nature Physics 11, 899 (2015)

    2015

  20. [20]

    A. A. Hyman, C. A. Weber, and F. J¨ ulicher, Liquid-liquid phase separation in biology, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 30, 39 (2014)

    2014

  21. [21]

    C. P. Brangwynne, C. R. Eckmann, D. S. Courson, A. Rybarska, C. Hoege, J. Gharakhani, F. J¨ ulicher, and A. A. Hyman, Germline p granules are liquid droplets that localize by controlled dissolution/condensation, Sci- ence324, 1729 (2009)

    2009

  22. [22]

    Shin and C

    Y. Shin and C. P. Brangwynne, Liquid phase condensa- tion in cell physiology and disease, Science357, eaaf4382 (2017)

    2017

  23. [23]

    Berry, C

    J. Berry, C. P. Brangwynne, and M. Haataja, Physi- cal principles of intracellular organization via active and passive phase transitions, Rep. Prog. Phys.81, 046601 (2018)

    2018

  24. [24]

    Tanaka, Unusual phase separation in a polymer so- lution caused by asymmetric molecular dynamics, Phys

    H. Tanaka, Unusual phase separation in a polymer so- lution caused by asymmetric molecular dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 3158 (1993)

    1993

  25. [25]

    Taniguchi and A

    T. Taniguchi and A. Onuki, Network domain structure in viscoelastic phase separation, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 4910 (1996)

    1996

  26. [26]

    Tanaka and T

    H. Tanaka and T. Araki, Phase inversion during vis- coelastic phase separation: roles of bulk and shear re- laxation moduli, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 4966 (1997)

    1997

  27. [27]

    Araki and H

    T. Araki and H. Tanaka, Three-dimensional numerical simulations of viscoelastic phase separation: Morpholog- ical characteristics, Macromolecules34, 1953 (2001)

    1953

  28. [28]

    Zhang, Z

    J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, H. Zhang, and Y. Yang, Kinetics and morphologies of viscoelastic phase separation, Phys. Rev. E64, 051510 (2001)

    2001

  29. [29]

    Tanaka and T

    H. Tanaka and T. Araki, Viscoelastic phase separation in soft matter: Numerical-simulation study on its physical mechanism, Chem. Eng. Sci.61, 2108 (2006)

    2006

  30. [30]

    Doi, Gel dynamics, J

    M. Doi, Gel dynamics, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.78, 052001 (2009)

    2009

  31. [31]

    Tanaka, Viscoelastic phase separation in biological cells, Commun

    H. Tanaka, Viscoelastic phase separation in biological cells, Commun. Phys.5, 167 (2022)

    2022

  32. [32]

    Alshareedah, M

    I. Alshareedah, M. M. Moosa, M. Pham, D. A. Po- toyan, and P. R. Banerjee, Programmable viscoelasticity in protein-rna condensates with disordered sticker-spacer polypeptides, Nat. Commun.12, 6620 (2021)

    2021

  33. [33]

    Jawerth, E

    L. Jawerth, E. Fischer-Friedrich, S. Saha, J. Wang, T. Franzmann, X. Zhang, J. Sachweh, M. Ruer, M. Ijavi, S. Saha,et al., Protein condensates as aging maxwell flu- ids, Science370, 1317 (2020)

    2020

  34. [34]

    H. H. Cheng, J. V. Roggeveen, H. Wang, H. A. Stone, Z. Shi, and C. P. Brangwynne, Micropipette aspiration reveals differential rna-dependent viscoelasticity of nu- cleolar subcompartments, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 122, e2407423122 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    Ghosh, D

    A. Ghosh, D. Kota, and H.-X. Zhou, Shear relaxation governs fusion dynamics of biomolecular condensates, Nat. Commun.12, 5995 (2021). 11

    2021

  36. [36]

    Boisvert, S

    F.-M. Boisvert, S. Van Koningsbruggen, J. Navascu´ es, and A. I. Lamond, The multifunctional nucleolus, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.8, 574 (2007)

    2007

  37. [37]

    Carmo-Fonseca, L

    M. Carmo-Fonseca, L. Mendes-Soares, and I. Campos, To be or not to be in the nucleolus, Nat. Cell Biol.2, E107 (2000)

    2000

  38. [38]

    J. A. Riback, J. M. Eeftens, D. S. Lee, S. A. Quinodoz, A. Donlic, N. Orlovsky, L. Wiesner, L. Beckers, L. A. Becker, A. R. Strom,et al., Viscoelasticity and advective flow of rna underlies nucleolar form and function, Mol. Cell83, 3095 (2023)

    2023

  39. [39]

    E. B. Mougey, M. O’Reilly, Y. Osheim, O. L. Miller, A. Beyer, and B. Sollner-Webb, The terminal balls char- acteristic of eukaryotic rrna transcription units in chro- matin spreads are rrna processing complexes, Genes Dev. 7, 1609 (1993)

    1993

  40. [40]

    O. L. Miller Jr, The nucleolus, chromosomes, and visual- ization of genetic activity, J. Cell Biol.91, 15s (1981)

    1981

  41. [41]

    Milner, Hydrodynamics of semidilute polymer solu- tions, Phys

    S. Milner, Hydrodynamics of semidilute polymer solu- tions, Phys. Rev. Lett.66, 1477 (1991)

    1991

  42. [42]

    Doi and A

    M. Doi and A. Onuki, Dynamic coupling between stress and composition in polymer solutions and blends, Jour- nal de Physique II2, 1631 (1992)

    1992

  43. [43]

    V. G. Mavrantzas and A. N. Beris, Modeling of the rhe- ology and flow-induced concentration changes in polymer solutions, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 273 (1992)

    1992

  44. [44]

    Larson, Flow-induced mixing, demixing, and phase transitions in polymeric fluids, Rheol

    R. Larson, Flow-induced mixing, demixing, and phase transitions in polymeric fluids, Rheol. Acta.31, 497 (1992)

    1992

  45. [45]

    A. N. Beris and B. J. Edwards,Thermodynamics of Flow- ing Systems: With Internal Microstructure, 36 (Oxford University Press, 1994)

    1994

  46. [46]

    A. N. Beris and V. G. Mavrantzas, On the compatibility between various macroscopic formalisms for the concen- tration and flow of dilute polymer solutions, J. Rheol.38, 1235 (1994)

    1994

  47. [47]

    Tanaka, Universality of viscoelastic phase separation in dynamically asymmetric fluid mixtures, Phys

    H. Tanaka, Universality of viscoelastic phase separation in dynamically asymmetric fluid mixtures, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 787 (1996)

    1996

  48. [48]

    Tanaka, Viscoelastic model of phase separation, Phys

    H. Tanaka, Viscoelastic model of phase separation, Phys. Rev. E56, 4451 (1997)

    1997

  49. [49]

    Tanaka, Viscoelastic phase separation, J

    H. Tanaka, Viscoelastic phase separation, J. Phys. Con- dens. Matter.12, R207 (2000)

    2000

  50. [50]

    Tanaka, Viscoelastic phase separation in soft matter and foods, Farad

    H. Tanaka, Viscoelastic phase separation in soft matter and foods, Farad. Discuss.158, 371 (2012)

    2012

  51. [51]

    P. J. Flory,Principles of Polymer Chemistry(Cornell University Press, 1953)

    1953

  52. [52]

    M. L. Huggins, Theory of solutions of high polymers1, J. Am. Chem. Soc.64, 1712 (1942)

    1942

  53. [53]

    Boyko and H

    E. Boyko and H. A. Stone, Perspective on the descrip- tion of viscoelastic flows via continuum elastic dumbbell models, J. Eng. Math.147, 5 (2024)

    2024

  54. [54]

    Van Rossum and F

    G. Van Rossum and F. L. Drake Jr,Python tutorial(Cen- trum voor Wiskunde en Informatica Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1995)

    1995

  55. [55]

    C. R. Harris, K. J. Millman, S. J. van der Walt, R. Gom- mers, P. Virtanen, D. Cournapeau, E. Wieser, J. Tay- lor, S. Berg, N. J. Smith, R. Kern, M. Picus, S. Hoyer, M. H. van Kerkwijk, M. Brett, A. Haldane, J. F. del R´ ıo, M. Wiebe, P. Peterson, P. G´ erard-Marchant, K. Shep- pard, T. Reddy, W. Weckesser, H. Abbasi, C. Gohlke, and T. E. Oliphant, Array ...

    2020

  56. [56]

    G. I. Barenblatt,Scaling, Vol. 34 (Cambridge University Press, 2003)

    2003

  57. [57]

    Zheng and H

    Z. Zheng and H. A. Stone, The influence of boundaries on gravity currents and thin films: drainage, confinement, convergence, and deformation effects, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.54, 27 (2022)

    2022

  58. [58]

    Moriel and H

    A. Moriel and H. A. Stone, Nonlinear diffusion and com- pressive rims in source-driven biopolymer condensates, a link will be provided by the publisher

  59. [59]

    J. W. Cahn and J. E. Hilliard, Free energy of a nonuni- form system. i. interfacial free energy, J. Chem. Phys28, 258 (1958)

    1958

  60. [60]

    J. W. Cahn and J. E. Hilliard, Free energy of a nonuni- form system. iii. nucleation in a two-component incom- pressible fluid, J. Chem. Phys31, 688 (1959)

    1959

  61. [61]

    Alberti, Phase separation in biology, Curr

    S. Alberti, Phase separation in biology, Curr. Biol.27, R1097 (2017)

    2017

  62. [62]

    D. M. Mitrea and R. W. Kriwacki, Phase separation in biology; functional organization of a higher order, Cell Commun. Signal.14, 1 (2016)

    2016