pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.21032 · v1 · pith:B4XHKPVOnew · submitted 2026-06-19 · ⚛️ nucl-th · hep-ex· hep-th· nucl-ex

Ab Initio Nuclear Theory for Heavy Nuclei and Its Application to Dark Matter-Nucleus Scattering

Bai-Shan Hu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 13:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th hep-exhep-thnucl-ex
keywords ab initio nuclear theoryheavy nuclei208Pbdark matter direct detectionnuclear responsesuncertainty quantificationbeyond Standard Model searches
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ab initio nuclear theory now delivers uncertainty-quantified predictions for heavy nuclei like 208Pb and their responses to dark matter particles.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews recent extensions of ab initio nuclear theory to the heavy nucleus 208Pb, to medium-mass nuclei with complex deformation, and to weakly bound nuclei near the driplines. These calculations produce nuclear structure and responses to external probes directly from nuclear forces and electroweak currents, with quantified uncertainties. The work also covers ab initio results for nuclear responses relevant to dark matter direct detection. If successful, the approach reduces nuclear-physics uncertainties that currently limit interpretation of experiments searching for physics beyond the Standard Model.

Core claim

Ab initio methods have reached the point where they furnish uncertainty-quantified predictions for the structure of 208Pb and other heavy systems, as well as for the nuclear responses that govern dark matter scattering, all derived from the underlying nuclear force and electroweak currents.

What carries the argument

Ab initio calculations of nuclear structure and response functions derived directly from nuclear forces and electroweak currents, with quantified uncertainties.

If this is right

  • Nuclear-physics uncertainties in dark matter direct detection are substantially reduced.
  • Interpretation of current and future precision experiments searching for physics beyond the Standard Model becomes more robust.
  • Predictions for nuclear responses become available for heavy, deformed, and dripline nuclei.
  • Uncertainty-quantified results are obtained for both nuclear structure observables and scattering cross sections.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same framework could be applied to other nuclei used in rare-event searches, such as xenon or germanium targets.
  • If the uncertainty reduction holds, it would allow tighter constraints on dark matter particle properties from existing experimental limits.
  • New measurements of nuclear radii or electromagnetic responses in 208Pb could serve as direct tests of the predictions.
  • The methods might be extended to calculate responses for other beyond-Standard-Model probes, such as neutrino-nucleus scattering.

Load-bearing premise

The ab initio calculations for 208Pb and the other nuclei discussed yield reliable uncertainty-quantified predictions that can be directly applied to dark matter scattering.

What would settle it

A large mismatch between the predicted nuclear response functions for 208Pb and the values extracted from dark matter direct detection data or from independent nuclear experiments on the same nucleus would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.21032 by Bai-Shan Hu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Trends in ab initio calculations for the nuclear A-body problem, adapted from Ref. [4]. The bars mark the years of the first realistic computations of doubly magic nuclei. The height of each bar is the mass number A divided by the logarithm of the total computational power RTOP500 (in flop/s) from the pertinent TOP500 list (https://www.top500.org/statistics/perfdevel/). The point labeled ‘this work’ refers… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: a. Ab initio axial-vector structure factors Si (include longitudinal and electric transverse multipoles) as a function of momentum transfer q. The gray bands indicate large-scale shell model (LSSM) calculations. The IMSRG bands depict ab initio results that spread in results from different interactions (lighter bands) and uncertainties in 2BCs (darker bands), while LSSM bands are from 2BC uncertainties onl… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The era of precision ab initio nuclear theory has arrived, enabling uncertainty-quantified predictions for nuclear structure and for interactions with external probes directly from the underlying nuclear force and electroweak currents. This review highlights recent breakthroughs that extend ab initio calculations to the heavy nucleus $^{208}$Pb, to medium-mass systems with complex deformation, and to weakly-bound nuclei near the driplines. We also summarize ab initio calculations of nuclear responses for dark matter direct detection. Together, these advances demonstrate how ab initio methods can substantially reduce nuclear-physics uncertainties in searches for physics beyond the Standard Model, providing a more robust interpretation of current and forthcoming precision experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review summarizing recent breakthroughs in ab initio nuclear theory, including extensions of calculations to the heavy nucleus 208Pb, to medium-mass systems with complex deformation, and to weakly-bound nuclei near the driplines. It also summarizes ab initio calculations of nuclear responses for dark matter direct detection. The central claim is that these advances enable uncertainty-quantified predictions directly from nuclear forces and currents, substantially reducing nuclear-physics uncertainties in beyond-Standard-Model searches and supporting more robust interpretation of precision experiments.

Significance. If the cited advances hold, the review is significant for synthesizing progress on previously intractable systems (heavy nuclei and deformed cases) and for explicitly linking these to DM response calculations. It gives credit to the underlying methodological breakthroughs that enable uncertainty quantification, which is a key strength for applications in BSM physics.

minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrasing 'the era of precision ab initio nuclear theory has arrived' is a strong claim; a short quantitative example of achieved precision or uncertainty reduction (drawn from the cited works) would strengthen the opening paragraph.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of the manuscript, recognition of its significance in synthesizing recent ab initio advances for heavy and deformed nuclei as well as dark matter responses, and recommendation to accept. No major comments were raised.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review of external ab initio results; no internal derivation chain

full rationale

This is a review paper that summarizes cited breakthroughs in ab initio calculations for 208Pb, deformed nuclei, dripline systems, and DM responses. No new equations, predictions, or derivations are presented whose validity depends on internal steps. All load-bearing claims rest on external prior works, which are independent of this manuscript. No self-definitional, fitted-input, or self-citation-load-bearing patterns exist within the text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are detailed in the abstract; the paper summarizes existing methods in the field.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5636 in / 956 out tokens · 25747 ms · 2026-06-26T13:09:31.600935+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

206 extracted references · 183 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [2]

    Ekström, C

    Ekström A, Forssén C, Hagen G, Jansen GR, Jiang W, Papenbrock T. What is ab initio in nuclear theory? Front. Phys.\/ 11 (2023) 1129094. doi:10.3389/fphy.2023.1129094

    work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2023.1129094 2023

  2. [7]

    The particle physics experiments database [webpage can be accessed at the link: https://athompson-git.github.io/experiments.html] (2025)

    [Dataset] Thompson A. The particle physics experiments database [webpage can be accessed at the link: https://athompson-git.github.io/experiments.html] (2025)

    2025

  3. [10]

    Modern theory of nuclear forces

    Epelbaum E, Hammer HW, Mei ner UG. Modern theory of nuclear forces. Rev. Mod. Phys.\/ 81 (2009) 1773--1825. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1773

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1773 2009

  4. [11]

    Chiral effective field theory and nuclear forces

    Machleidt R, Entem DR. Chiral effective field theory and nuclear forces. Phys. Rep.\/ 503 (2011) 1. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2011.02.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2011.02.001 2011

  5. [12]

    Nuclear effective field theory: Status and perspectives

    Hammer HW, K\"onig S, van Kolck U. Nuclear effective field theory: Status and perspectives. Rev. Mod. Phys.\/ 92 (2020) 025004. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.92.025004

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.025004 2020

  6. [13]

    Nuclear forces for precision nuclear physics: A collection of perspectives

    Tews I, Davoudi Z, Ekstr \"o m A, Holt JD, Becker K, Brice \ n o R, et al. Nuclear forces for precision nuclear physics: A collection of perspectives. Few-Body Syst.\/ 63 (2022) 67. doi:10.1007/s00601-022-01749-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s00601-022-01749-x 2022

  7. [17]

    The neutron dripline in calcium isotopes from a chiral interaction

    Hu BS, Ekström A, Forssén C, Hagen G, Jiang WG, Miyagi T, et al. The neutron dripline in calcium isotopes from a chiral interaction. arXiv:2512.11723 [nucl-th]\/ (2025 a ). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2512.11723

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.11723 2025

  8. [18]

    An Advanced Course in Computational Nuclear Physics\/ (Cham: Springer) (2017)

    Hjorth-Jensen M, Lombardo MP, van Kolck U. An Advanced Course in Computational Nuclear Physics\/ (Cham: Springer) (2017)

    2017

  9. [22]

    Quantum monte carlo methods for nuclear physics

    Carlson J, Gandolfi S, Pederiva F, Pieper SC, Schiavilla R, Schmidt KE, et al. Quantum monte carlo methods for nuclear physics. Rev. Mod. Phys.\/ 87 (2015) 1067--1118. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.87.1067

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.1067 2015

  10. [27]

    Ab initio no-core full configuration calculations of light nuclei

    Maris P, Vary JP, Shirokov AM. Ab initio no-core full configuration calculations of light nuclei. Phys. Rev. C\/ 79 (2009) 014308. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.79.014308

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.79.014308 2009

  11. [28]

    Origin of the anomalous long lifetime of ^ 14 C

    Maris P, Vary JP, Navr\'atil P, Ormand WE, Nam H, Dean DJ. Origin of the anomalous long lifetime of ^ 14 C . Phys. Rev. Lett.\/ 106 (2011) 202502. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.202502

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.202502 2011

  12. [32]

    Ab initio calculation of the Hoyle state

    Epelbaum E, Krebs H, Lee D, Mei ner UG. Ab initio calculation of the Hoyle state. Phys. Rev. Lett.\/ 106 (2011) 192501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.192501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.192501 2011

  13. [36]

    Many-body Methods in Chemistry and Physics\/ (Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press) (2009)

    Shavitt I, Bartlett RJ. Many-body Methods in Chemistry and Physics\/ (Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press) (2009)

    2009

  14. [37]

    Coupled-cluster computations of atomic nuclei

    Hagen G, Papenbrock T, Hjorth-Jensen M, Dean DJ. Coupled-cluster computations of atomic nuclei. Rep. Prog. Phys.\/ 77 (2014) 096302. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/77/9/096302

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/77/9/096302 2014

  15. [39]

    Ab initio coupled-cluster effective interactions for the shell model: Application to neutron-rich oxygen and carbon isotopes

    Jansen GR, Engel J, Hagen G, Navratil P, Signoracci A. Ab initio coupled-cluster effective interactions for the shell model: Application to neutron-rich oxygen and carbon isotopes. Phys. Rev. Lett.\/ 113 (2014) 142502. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.142502

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.142502 2014

  16. [50]

    Ab initio Gamow in-medium similarity renormalization group with resonance and continuum

    Hu BS, Wu Q, Sun ZH, Xu FR. Ab initio Gamow in-medium similarity renormalization group with resonance and continuum. Phys. Rev. C\/ 99 (2019) 061302. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.99.061302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.99.061302 2019

  17. [52]

    Deformed in-medium similarity renormalization group

    Yuan Q, Fan SQ, Hu BS, Li JG, Zhang S, Wang SM, et al. Deformed in-medium similarity renormalization group. Phys. Rev. C\/ 105 (2022) L061303. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.105.L061303

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.105.l061303 2022

  18. [55]

    Ab initio nuclear many-body perturbation calculations in the hartree-fock basis

    Hu BS, Xu FR, Sun ZH, Vary JP, Li T. Ab initio nuclear many-body perturbation calculations in the hartree-fock basis. Phys. Rev. C\/ 94 (2016) 014303. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.94.014303

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.94.014303 2016

  19. [56]

    Chiral interactions up to next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order and nuclear saturation

    Drischler C, Hebeler K, Schwenk A. Chiral interactions up to next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order and nuclear saturation. Phys. Rev. Lett.\/ 122 (2019) 042501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.042501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.042501 2019

  20. [63]

    Ab initio mapping of the boundary of the n=20 island of inversion (2026)

    [Dataset] Zhou EF, Ding CR, Luo QY, Yao JM, Hergert H. Ab initio mapping of the boundary of the n=20 island of inversion (2026). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.07363

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.07363 2026

  21. [64]

    Angular-momentum projection in coupled-cluster theory: Structure of ^ 34 Mg

    Hagen G, Novario SJ, Sun ZH, Papenbrock T, Jansen GR, Lietz JG, et al. Angular-momentum projection in coupled-cluster theory: Structure of ^ 34 Mg . Phys. Rev. C\/ 105 (2022) 064311. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.105.064311

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.105.064311 2022

  22. [70]

    Dynamics of quantum systems embedded in a continuum

    Okołowicz J, Płoszajczak M, Rotter I. Dynamics of quantum systems embedded in a continuum. Phys. Rep.\/ 374 (2003) 271--383. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00366-6

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(02)00366-6 2003

  23. [71]

    Shell model in the complex energy plane

    Michel N, Nazarewicz W, Płoszajczak M, Vertse T. Shell model in the complex energy plane. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.\/ 36 (2009) 013101. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/36/1/013101

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/36/1/013101 2009

  24. [72]

    Two-particle resonant states in a many-body mean field

    Id Betan R, Liotta RJ, Sandulescu N, Vertse T. Two-particle resonant states in a many-body mean field. Phys. Rev. Lett.\/ 89 (2002) 042501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.042501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.042501 2002

  25. [73]

    Gamow shell model description of neutron-rich nuclei

    Michel N, Nazarewicz W, P oszajczak M, Bennaceur K. Gamow shell model description of neutron-rich nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett.\/ 89 (2002) 042502. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.042502

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.042502 2002

  26. [75]

    White paper: from bound states to the continuum

    Johnson CW, Launey KD, Auerbach N, Bacca S, Barrett BR, Brune C, et al. White paper: from bound states to the continuum. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.\/ 47 (2020) 123001. doi:10.1088/1361-6471/abb129

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6471/abb129 2020

  27. [79]

    Ab initio no-core Gamow shell model calculations with realistic interactions

    Papadimitriou G, Rotureau J, Michel N, P oszajczak M, Barrett BR. Ab initio no-core Gamow shell model calculations with realistic interactions. Phys. Rev. C\/ 88 (2013) 044318. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.88.044318

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.88.044318 2013

  28. [80]

    Ab initio no-core Gamow shell-model calculations of multineutron systems

    Li JG, Michel N, Hu BS, Zuo W, Xu FR. Ab initio no-core Gamow shell-model calculations of multineutron systems. Phys. Rev. C\/ 100 (2019) 054313. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.100.054313

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.100.054313 2019

  29. [81]

    Ab initio computation of the ^ 17 F proton halo state and resonances in A=17 nuclei

    Hagen G, Papenbrock T, Hjorth-Jensen M. Ab initio computation of the ^ 17 F proton halo state and resonances in A=17 nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett.\/ 104 (2010) 182501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.182501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.182501 2010

  30. [82]

    Continuum effects and three-nucleon forces in neutron-rich oxygen isotopes

    Hagen G, Hjorth-Jensen M, Jansen GR, Machleidt R, Papenbrock T. Continuum effects and three-nucleon forces in neutron-rich oxygen isotopes. Phys. Rev. Lett.\/ 108 (2012 a ) 242501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.242501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.242501 2012

  31. [83]

    Evolution of shell structure in neutron-rich calcium isotopes

    Hagen G, Hjorth-Jensen M, Jansen GR, Machleidt R, Papenbrock T. Evolution of shell structure in neutron-rich calcium isotopes. Phys. Rev. Lett.\/ 109 (2012 b ) 032502. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.032502

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.032502 2012

  32. [84]

    An ab-initio Gamow shell model approach with a core

    Hu BS, Wu Q, Li JG, Ma YZ, Sun ZH, Michel N, et al. An ab-initio Gamow shell model approach with a core. Phys. Lett. B\/ 802 (2020) 135206. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135206

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135206 2020

  33. [85]

    The roles of three-nucleon force and continuum coupling in mirror symmetry breaking of oxygen mass region

    Zhang S, Ma YZ, Li JG, Hu BS, Yuan Q, Cheng ZH, et al. The roles of three-nucleon force and continuum coupling in mirror symmetry breaking of oxygen mass region. Phys. Lett. B\/ 827 (2022) 136958. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.136958. ArXiv: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.02844

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.136958 2022

  34. [86]

    Ab initio descriptions of A =16 mirror nuclei with resonance and continuum coupling

    Zhang S, Xu FR, Li JG, Hu BS, Cheng ZH, Michel N, et al. Ab initio descriptions of A =16 mirror nuclei with resonance and continuum coupling. Phys. Rev. C\/ 108 (2023) 064316. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.108.064316

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.108.064316 2023

  35. [89]

    Ab initio calculations of neutrinoless decay refine neutrino mass limits (2023)

    Belley A, Miyagi T, Stroberg SR, Holt JD. Ab initio calculations of neutrinoless decay refine neutrino mass limits (2023)

    2023

  36. [91]

    Ab initio correlations between neutrinoless and two-neutrino double-beta decays in $^{48}$Ca

    Lian X, Ding CR, Bai CL, Yao JM. Ab initio correlations between neutrinoless and two-neutrino double-beta decays in ^ 48 Ca . arXiv:2605.19479 [nucl-th]\/ (2026). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2605.19479

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.19479 2026

  37. [99]

    2018, RvMP, 90, 045002, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.045002

    Bertone G, Hooper D. History of dark matter. Rev. Mod. Phys.\/ 90 (2018) 045002. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.90.045002

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.045002 2018

  38. [100]

    Dark matter candidates from particle physics and methods of detection

    Feng JL. Dark matter candidates from particle physics and methods of detection. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.\/ 48 (2010) 495--545. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101659

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101659 2010

  39. [101]

    Dark matter direct-detection experiments

    Undagoitia TM, Rauch L. Dark matter direct-detection experiments. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.\/ 43 (2015) 013001. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/1/013001

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/1/013001 2015

  40. [103]

    Current status of direct dark matter detection experiments

    Liu JL, Chen X, Ji XD. Current status of direct dark matter detection experiments. Nat. Phys.\/ 13 (2017) 212--216

    2017

  41. [104]

    The Theory of Direct Dark Matter Detection: A Guide to Computations\/ (Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland: Springer Cham) (2022)

    Del Nobile E. The Theory of Direct Dark Matter Detection: A Guide to Computations\/ (Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland: Springer Cham) (2022). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95228-0

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-95228-0 2022

  42. [105]

    Nuclear physics of dark matter detection

    Engel J, Pittel S, Vogel P. Nuclear physics of dark matter detection. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E\/ 01 (1992) 1--37. doi:10.1142/S0218301392000023

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218301392000023 1992

  43. [106]

    Supersymmetric dark matter

    Jungman G, Kamionkowski M, Griest K. Supersymmetric dark matter. Phys. Rep.\/ 267 (1996) 195--373. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(95)00058-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(95)00058-5 1996

  44. [107]

    WIMP dark matter candidates and searches current status and future prospects

    Roszkowski L, Sessolo EM, Trojanowski S. WIMP dark matter candidates and searches current status and future prospects. Rep. Prog. Phys.\/ 81 (2018) 066201. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aab913

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aab913 2018

  45. [108]

    Direct detection of WIMP dark matter: concepts and status

    Schumann M. Direct detection of WIMP dark matter: concepts and status. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.\/ 46 (2019) 103003. doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ab2ea5

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ab2ea5 2019

  46. [120]

    Chiral power counting of one- and two-body currents in direct detection of dark matter

    Hoferichter M, Klos P, Schwenk A. Chiral power counting of one- and two-body currents in direct detection of dark matter. Phys. Lett. B\/ 746 (2015) 410--416. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.05.041

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.05.041 2015

  47. [121]

    Nuclear currents in chiral effective field theory

    Krebs H. Nuclear currents in chiral effective field theory. Eur. Phys. J. A\/ 56 (2020) 234. doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00230-9

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00230-9 2020

  48. [124]

    Analysis strategies for general spin-independent WIMP-nucleus scattering

    Hoferichter M, Klos P, Men\'endez J, Schwenk A. Analysis strategies for general spin-independent WIMP-nucleus scattering . Phys. Rev. D\/ 94 (2016) 063505. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.063505

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.063505 2016

  49. [125]

    Coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering: EFT analysis and nuclear responses

    Hoferichter M, Men\'endez J, Schwenk A. Coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering: EFT analysis and nuclear responses. Phys. Rev. D\/ 102 (2020) 074018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.074018

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.074018 2020

  50. [132]

    Three-nucleon low-energy constants from the consistency of interactions and currents in chiral effective field theory

    Gazit D, Quaglioni S, Navr\'atil P. Three-nucleon low-energy constants from the consistency of interactions and currents in chiral effective field theory. Phys. Rev. Lett.\/ 103 (2009) 102502. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.102502

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.102502 2009

  51. [133]

    Erratum: Three-nucleon low-energy constants from the consistency of interactions and currents in chiral effective field theory [ Phys

    Gazit D, Quaglioni S, Navr\'atil P. Erratum: Three-nucleon low-energy constants from the consistency of interactions and currents in chiral effective field theory [ Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 102502 (2009) ]. Phys. Rev. Lett.\/ 122 (2019) 029901. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.029901

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.029901 2009

  52. [134]

    Chiral two-body currents in nuclei: Gamow-teller transitions and neutrinoless double-beta decay

    Men\'endez J, Gazit D, Schwenk A. Chiral two-body currents in nuclei: Gamow-teller transitions and neutrinoless double-beta decay. Phys. Rev. Lett.\/ 107 (2011) 062501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.062501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.062501 2011

  53. [135]

    Quantum M onte C arlo calculations of electromagnetic moments and transitions in A 9 nuclei with meson-exchange currents derived from chiral effective field theory

    Pastore S, Pieper SC, Schiavilla R, Wiringa RB. Quantum M onte C arlo calculations of electromagnetic moments and transitions in A 9 nuclei with meson-exchange currents derived from chiral effective field theory. Phys. Rev. C\/ 87 (2013) 035503. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.87.035503

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.87.035503 2013

  54. [136]

    Electromagnetic reactions on light nuclei

    Bacca S, Pastore S. Electromagnetic reactions on light nuclei. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.\/ 41 (2014) 123002. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/41/12/123002

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/41/12/123002 2014

  55. [137]

    Effects of three-nucleon forces and two-body currents on gamow-teller strengths

    Ekstr\"om A, Jansen GR, Wendt KA, Hagen G, Papenbrock T, Bacca S, et al. Effects of three-nucleon forces and two-body currents on gamow-teller strengths. Phys. Rev. Lett.\/ 113 (2014) 262504. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.262504

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.262504 2014

  56. [138]

    Electromagnetic response of ^ 12 C : A first-principles calculation

    Lovato A, Gandolfi S, Carlson J, Pieper SC, Schiavilla R. Electromagnetic response of ^ 12 C : A first-principles calculation. Phys. Rev. Lett.\/ 117 (2016) 082501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.082501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.082501 2016

  57. [139]

    Discrepancy between experimental and theoretical -decay rates resolved from first principles

    Gysbers P, Hagen G, Holt JD, Jansen GR, Morris TD, Navr \'a til P, et al. Discrepancy between experimental and theoretical -decay rates resolved from first principles. Nat. Phys.\/ 15 (2019) 428--431. doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0450-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0450-7 2019

  58. [140]

    Spin-dependent WIMP scattering off nuclei

    Men\'endez J, Gazit D, Schwenk A. Spin-dependent WIMP scattering off nuclei. Phys. Rev. D\/ 86 (2012) 103511. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.103511

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.103511 2012

  59. [141]

    Large-scale nuclear structure calculations for spin-dependent WIMP scattering with chiral effective field theory currents

    Klos P, Men\'endez J, Gazit D, Schwenk A. Large-scale nuclear structure calculations for spin-dependent WIMP scattering with chiral effective field theory currents. Phys. Rev. D\/ 88 (2013) 083516. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.083516

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.083516 2013

  60. [142]

    Erratum: Large-scale nuclear structure calculations for spin-dependent WIMP scattering with chiral effective field theory currents [ P hys

    Klos P, Men\'endez J, Gazit D, Schwenk A. Erratum: Large-scale nuclear structure calculations for spin-dependent WIMP scattering with chiral effective field theory currents [ P hys. R ev. D 88, 083516 (2013)]. Phys. Rev. D\/ 89 (2014) 029901. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.029901

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.029901 2013

  61. [143]

    Nuclear structure factors for general spin-independent WIMP -nucleus scattering

    Hoferichter M, Klos P, Men\'endez J, Schwenk A. Nuclear structure factors for general spin-independent WIMP -nucleus scattering. Phys. Rev. D\/ 99 (2019) 055031. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.055031

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.055031 2019

  62. [144]

    Quantum monte carlo calculations of dark matter scattering off light nuclei

    Andreoli L, Cirigliano V, Gandolfi S, Pederiva F. Quantum monte carlo calculations of dark matter scattering off light nuclei. Phys. Rev. C\/ 99 (2019) 025501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.99.025501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.99.025501 2019

  63. [145]

    First results on the scalar WIMP -pion coupling, using the XENON1T experiment

    Aprile E, et al. First results on the scalar WIMP -pion coupling, using the XENON1T experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett.\/ 122 (2019) 071301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.071301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.071301 2019

  64. [147]

    Theoretical tools for neutrino scattering: interplay between lattice qcd, efts, nuclear physics, phenomenology, and neutrino event generators

    Alvarez Ruso L, et al. Theoretical tools for neutrino scattering: interplay between lattice qcd, efts, nuclear physics, phenomenology, and neutrino event generators. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.\/ (2025)

    2025

  65. [149]

    Trends of neutron skins and radii of mirror nuclei from first principles

    Novario SJ, Lonardoni D, Gandolfi S, Hagen G. Trends of neutron skins and radii of mirror nuclei from first principles. Phys. Rev. Lett.\/ 130 (2023) 032501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.032501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.032501 2023

  66. [157]

    Dark matter-induced nuclear de-excitation at SBND with ab initio nuclear theory

    Dutta B, Goswami D, Hu BS, Huang WC, Pandey V. Dark matter-induced nuclear de-excitation at SBND with ab initio nuclear theory. arXiv:2602.02817 [nucl-th]\/ (2026). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.02817

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.02817 2026

  67. [158]

    2026 , journal=

    Ab initio mapping of the boundary of the N=20 island of inversion , author=. 2026 , journal=. 2603.07363 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv 2026

  68. [159]

    Nuclear Lattice Effective Field Theory : An introduction

    L. Nuclear Lattice Effective Field Theory : An introduction. 2019. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-14189-9

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-14189-9 2019

  69. [160]

    Perturbative Quantum Monte Carlo Method for Nuclear Physics , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.242501 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.242501 2022

  70. [161]

    Structure Factors for Hot Neutron Matter from Ab Initio Lattice Simulations with High-Fidelity Chiral Interactions , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.232502 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.232502 2024

  71. [162]

    Auxiliary field diffusion Monte Carlo calculations of light and medium-mass nuclei with local chiral interactions , author =. Phys. Rev. C , volume =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.97.044318 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.97.044318 2018

  72. [163]

    and Blunt, Nick S

    Spencer, James S. and Blunt, Nick S. and Choi, Seonghoon and Etrych, Ji. The HANDE-QMC Project: Open-Source Stochastic Quantum Chemistry from the Ground State Up , volume =. J. Chem. Theory Comput. , publisher =. 2019 , month =. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01217 , number =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01217 2019

  73. [164]

    Configuration-interaction Monte Carlo method and its application to the trapped unitary Fermi gas , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2013 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.88.053622 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.88.053622 2013

  74. [165]

    Quantum Monte Carlo Calculations of Neutron Matter with Nonlocal Chiral Interactions , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2014 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.221103 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.221103 2014

  75. [166]

    Quantum Monte Carlo calculations in configuration space with three-nucleon forces , author =. Phys. Rev. C , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.107.044303 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.107.044303 2023

  76. [167]

    and Navr\'atil, Petr and Vary, James P

    Barrett, Bruce R. and Navr\'atil, Petr and Vary, James P. , year =. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2012.10.003 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2012.10.003 2012

  77. [168]

    Liebig, S. and Mei. Jacobi no-core shell model for p -shell nuclei , volume =. Eur. Phys. J. A , publisher =. 2016 , month =. doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16103-5 , number =

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16103-5 2016

  78. [169]

    Coupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry , author =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =. 2007 , month =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.79.291 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.291 2007

  79. [170]

    Hu, B. S. and Sun, Z. H. and Hagen, G. and Papenbrock, T. , journal =. Ab initio computations of strongly deformed nuclei near ^. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.110.L011302 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.110.l011302 2024

  80. [171]

    Multiscale Physics of Atomic Nuclei from First Principles , author =. Phys. Rev. X , volume =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.15.011028 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.15.011028 2025

Showing first 80 references.