pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.22007 · v1 · pith:MDG5A2QAnew · submitted 2026-06-20 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Monte Carlo Event Generators for Future Lepton Colliders

Alan Price This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 12:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords Monte Carlo event generatorslepton colliderselectroweak correctionsinitial-state radiationbeam dynamicsperturbative QCDnon-perturbative modellingevent simulation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Future high-precision lepton colliders will require Monte Carlo event generators with significantly increased accuracy and scope.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews the challenges facing Monte Carlo event generators as collider physics advances to high-precision lepton colliders. These generators provide the link between theoretical predictions and experimental measurements by simulating complete events. The central argument is that demands on accuracy will rise sharply in several areas. A sympathetic reader would care because reliable simulations determine what physics can be extracted from data. The review selects electroweak corrections, initial-state radiation, beam dynamics, perturbative QCD, and non-perturbative modelling as key topics requiring attention.

Core claim

Monte Carlo event generators are essential tools in collider physics that connect theoretical predictions to experimental measurements through fully exclusive event simulation, yet future lepton collider programmes will place significantly increased demands on their accuracy and scope, particularly in electroweak corrections, initial-state radiation, beam dynamics, perturbative QCD, and non-perturbative modelling.

What carries the argument

Monte Carlo event generators that deliver fully exclusive event simulation to bridge theory and experiment.

If this is right

  • Higher-order electroweak corrections must be integrated into the generators to meet precision targets.
  • Accurate treatment of initial-state radiation and beam dynamics will become essential for controlling systematic uncertainties.
  • Refinements in perturbative QCD and non-perturbative modelling will be needed to describe hadronic final states reliably.
  • Development priorities should focus on these areas to support the physics goals of next-generation colliders.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Successful improvements in these generators would directly reduce theoretical uncertainties limiting measurements at planned facilities.
  • The review implies that similar accuracy upgrades may be needed in related simulation tools for detector response.
  • A concrete extension would involve applying the highlighted challenges to specific benchmark processes such as Higgs boson production.

Load-bearing premise

The selective choice of topics including electroweak corrections, initial-state radiation, beam dynamics, perturbative QCD, and non-perturbative modelling adequately captures the most important open problems without exhaustive coverage.

What would settle it

Data from a future lepton collider demonstrating that existing Monte Carlo generators already deliver the required precision across all relevant observables without further development.

read the original abstract

Monte Carlo event generators are essential tools in collider physics, providing the link between theoretical predictions and experimental measurements through fully exclusive event simulation. Future collider programmes, particularly high-precision lepton colliders will place significantly increased demands on their accuracy and scope. This contribution reviews key challenges in MC generator development, including electroweak corrections, initial-state radiation, beam dynamics, perturbative QCD, and non-perturbative modelling. The discussion is not exhaustive and reflects a selective choice of topics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a selective review of challenges in Monte Carlo event generators for future high-precision lepton colliders. It states that these programmes will place significantly increased demands on the accuracy and scope of MC generators and discusses electroweak corrections, initial-state radiation, beam dynamics, perturbative QCD, and non-perturbative modelling, while explicitly noting that the discussion is not exhaustive and reflects a selective choice of topics.

Significance. As a narrative overview that restates community consensus on the role of MC generators, the paper can serve as a focused reference for identifying development priorities in the lepton-collider context. Its value lies in consolidating known issues rather than in new derivations, predictions, or exhaustive coverage; the upfront acknowledgment of selectivity removes any implicit claim of completeness.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and the recommendation to accept. The report accurately reflects the selective scope of the review as stated in the abstract.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: narrative review with no derivations or predictions

full rationale

The manuscript is explicitly a selective review of known challenges in Monte Carlo event generators for future lepton colliders. It presents no equations, quantitative predictions, fitted parameters, or derivation chains. The central claim restates community consensus on increased demands from high-precision colliders, with scope limitations stated upfront. No load-bearing steps exist that could reduce to self-citation, fitted inputs, or self-definition. This is the expected outcome for an overview paper without novel quantitative content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper with no central derivation, no fitted parameters, no new axioms, and no invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5590 in / 985 out tokens · 20439 ms · 2026-06-26T12:05:44.279239+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

290 extracted references · 207 canonical work pages · 104 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    SciPost Phys.7(3), 034 (2019) https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.7.3.034 arXiv:1905.09127 [hep- ph]

    Bothmann, E.,et al.: Event Generation with Sherpa 2.2. SciPost Phys.7(3), 034 (2019) https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.7.3.034 arXiv:1905.09127 [hep- ph]

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.7.3.034 2019

  2. [2]

    JHEP12, 156 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2024)156 arXiv:2410.22148 [hep-ph]

    Bothmann, E.,et al.: Event generation with Sherpa 3. JHEP12, 156 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2024)156 arXiv:2410.22148 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2024)156 2024

  3. [3]

    PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual

    Sjostrand, T., Mrenna, S., Skands, P.Z.: PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Man- ual. JHEP05, 026 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2006/05/026 arXiv:hep-ph/0603175

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/05/026 2006

  4. [5]

    SciPost Phys

    Bierlich, C.,et al.: A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3. SciPost Phys. Codeb.2022, 8 (2022) https://doi.org/10.21468/ SciPostPhysCodeb.8 arXiv:2203.11601 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  5. [6]

    MadGraph 5 : Going Beyond

    Alwall, J., Herquet, M., Maltoni, F., Mattelaer, O., Stelzer, T.: MadGraph 5 : Going Beyond. JHEP06, 128 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2011) 128 arXiv:1106.0522 [hep-ph] 12

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2011 2011

  6. [7]

    Alwall, J., Frederix, R., Frixione, S., Hirschi, V., Maltoni, F., Mattelaer, O., Shao, H.-S., Stelzer, T., Torrielli, P., Zaro, M.: The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their match- ingtopartonshowersimulations.JHEP07,079(2014)https://doi.org/10.1007/ JHEP07(2014)079 arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  7. [8]

    Bahr, M.,et al.: Herwig++ Physics and Manual. Eur. Phys. J. C58, 639–707 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0798-9 arXiv:0803.0883 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0798-9 2008

  8. [9]

    Bellm, J.,et al.: Herwig 7.0/Herwig++ 3.0 release note. Eur. Phys. J. C76(4), 196 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4018-8 arXiv:1512.01178 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4018-8 2016

  9. [10]

    Bewick, G.,et al.: Herwig 7.3 release note. Eur. Phys. J. C84(10), 1053 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13211-9 arXiv:2312.05175 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13211-9 2024

  10. [12]

    Jadach, S., Ward, B.F.L., Was, Z., Yost, S.A., Siodmok, A.: Multi-photon Monte Carlo event generator KKMCee for lepton and quark pair production in lepton colliders.Comput.Phys.Commun.283,108556(2023)https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.cpc.2022.108556 arXiv:2204.11949 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  11. [13]

    Jadach, S., Ward, B.F.L., Was, Z.: The Precision Monte Carlo event gen- erator K K for two fermion final states in e+ e- collisions. Comput. Phys. Commun.130, 260–325 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4655(00)00048-5 arXiv:hep-ph/9912214

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0010-4655(00)00048-5 2000

  12. [14]

    Carloni Calame, C.M., Montagna, G., Nicrosini, O., Piccinini, F.: The BABAYAGA event generator. Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.131, 48–55 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2004.02.008 arXiv:hep-ph/0312014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2004.02.008 2004

  13. [15]

    A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

    Alioli, S., Nason, P., Oleari, C., Re, E.: A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX. JHEP 06, 043 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043 arXiv:1002.2581 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2010)043 2010

  14. [16]

    Buckley, A.,et al.: General-purpose event generators for LHC physics. Phys. Rept.504, 145–233 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2011.03.005 arXiv:1101.2599 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2011.03.005 2011

  15. [17]

    SciPost Phys.16(5), 130 (2024) https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.16.5.130 arXiv:2203.11110 [hep-ph] 13

    Campbell, J.M.,et al.: Event generators for high-energy physics experiments. SciPost Phys.16(5), 130 (2024) https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.16.5.130 arXiv:2203.11110 [hep-ph] 13

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.16.5.130 2024

  16. [18]

    Reuter, J.: Monte Carlo Event Generators. (2025)

    2025

  17. [19]

    Catani, S., Seymour, M.H.: A General algorithm for calculating jet cross- sections in NLO QCD. Nucl. Phys. B485, 291–419 (1997) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0550-3213(96)00589-5 arXiv:hep-ph/9605323. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 510, 503–504 (1998)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(96)00589-5 1997

  18. [20]

    Frixione, S., Kunszt, Z., Signer, A.: Three jet cross-sections to next-to- leading order. Nucl. Phys. B467, 399–442 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0550-3213(96)00110-1 arXiv:hep-ph/9512328

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  19. [21]

    Stelzer, T., Long, W.F.: Automatic generation of tree level helicity ampli- tudes. Comput. Phys. Commun.81, 357–371 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0010-4655(94)90084-1 arXiv:hep-ph/9401258

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  20. [22]

    Caravaglios, F., Moretti, M.: An algorithm to compute Born scattering ampli- tudes without Feynman graphs. Phys. Lett. B358, 332–338 (1995) https: //doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(95)00971-M arXiv:hep-ph/9507237

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0370-2693(95)00971-m 1995

  21. [23]

    AMEGIC++ 1.0, A Matrix Element Generator In C++

    Krauss, F., Kuhn, R., Soff, G.: AMEGIC++ 1.0: A Matrix element generator in C++. JHEP02, 044 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2002/02/044 arXiv:hep-ph/0109036

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/02/044 2002

  22. [24]

    Gleisberg,T.,Hoeche,S.:Comix,anewmatrixelementgenerator.JHEP12,039 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2008/12/039 arXiv:0808.3674 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/12/039 2008

  23. [25]

    Moretti, M., Ohl, T., Reuter, J.: O’Mega: An Optimizing matrix element generator, 1981–2009 (2001) arXiv:hep-ph/0102195

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1981

  24. [26]

    Kanaki, A., Papadopoulos, C.G.: HELAC: A Package to compute electroweak helicity amplitudes. Comput. Phys. Commun.132, 306–315 (2000) https://doi. org/10.1016/S0010-4655(00)00151-X arXiv:hep-ph/0002082

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0010-4655(00)00151-x 2000

  25. [27]

    ALPGEN, a generator for hard multiparton processes in hadronic collisions

    Mangano, M.L., Moretti, M., Piccinini, F., Pittau, R., Polosa, A.D.: ALPGEN, a generator for hard multiparton processes in hadronic collisions. JHEP07, 001 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2003/07/001 arXiv:hep-ph/0206293

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/07/001 2003

  26. [28]

    Denner,A.,Dittmaier,S.:Reductionschemesforone-looptensorintegrals.Nucl. Phys. B734, 62–115 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.11.007 arXiv:hep-ph/0509141

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.11.007 2006

  27. [29]

    CutTools: a program implementing the OPP reduction method to compute one-loop amplitudes

    Ossola, G., Papadopoulos, C.G., Pittau, R.: CutTools: A Program implementing the OPP reduction method to compute one-loop amplitudes. JHEP03, 042 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2008/03/042 arXiv:0711.3596 [hep- ph] 14

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/03/042 2008

  28. [30]

    Peraro, T.: Ninja: Automated Integrand Reduction via Laurent Expansion for One-Loop Amplitudes. Comput. Phys. Commun.185, 2771–2797 (2014) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2014.06.017 arXiv:1403.1229 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2014.06.017 2014

  29. [31]

    COLLIER -- A fortran-library for one-loop integrals

    Denner, A., Dittmaier, S., Hofer, L.: COLLIER - A fortran-library for one- loop integrals. PoSLL2014, 071 (2014) https://doi.org/10.22323/1.211.0071 arXiv:1407.0087 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.22323/1.211.0071 2014

  30. [32]

    Ossola, G., Papadopoulos, C.G., Pittau, R.: Reducing full one-loop amplitudes to scalar integrals at the integrand level. Nucl. Phys. B763, 147–169 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.11.012 arXiv:hep-ph/0609007

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.11.012 2007

  31. [33]

    Cullen, G.,et al.: GOSAM-2.0: a tool for automated one-loop calculations within the Standard Model and beyond. Eur. Phys. J. C74(8), 3001 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3001-5 arXiv:1404.7096 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3001-5 2014

  32. [34]

    Automation of one-loop QCD corrections

    Hirschi, V., Frederix, R., Frixione, S., Garzelli, M.V., Maltoni, F., Pittau, R.: Automation of one-loop QCD corrections. JHEP05, 044 (2011) https://doi. org/10.1007/JHEP05(2011)044 arXiv:1103.0621 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep05(2011)044 2011

  33. [35]

    Buccioni, F., Lang, J.-N., Lindert, J.M., Maierhöfer, P., Pozzorini, S., Zhang, H., Zoller, M.F.: OpenLoops 2. Eur. Phys. J. C79(10), 866 (2019) https://doi. org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7306-2 arXiv:1907.13071 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7306-2 2019

  34. [36]

    Actis, S., Denner, A., Hofer, L., Lang, J.-N., Scharf, A., Uccirati, S.: RECOLA: REcursive Computation of One-Loop Amplitudes. Comput. Phys. Commun.214, 140–173 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2017.01.004 arXiv:1605.01090 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2017.01.004 2017

  35. [37]

    Berger, C.F., Bern, Z., Dixon, L.J., Febres Cordero, F., Forde, D., Ita, H., Kosower, D.A., Maitre, D.: An Automated Implementation of On-Shell Meth- ods for One-Loop Amplitudes. Phys. Rev. D78, 036003 (2008) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.036003 arXiv:0803.4180 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.036003 2008

  36. [38]

    Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method

    Frixione, S., Nason, P., Oleari, C.: Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method. JHEP11, 070 (2007) https: //doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070 arXiv:0709.2092 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070 2007

  37. [39]

    Matching NLO QCD computations and parton shower simulations

    Frixione, S., Webber, B.R.: Matching NLO QCD computations and parton shower simulations. JHEP06, 029 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/ 2002/06/029 arXiv:hep-ph/0204244

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/ 2002

  38. [40]

    JHEP05, 143 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2020)143 arXiv:1908.06987 [hep-ph]

    Monni, P.F., Nason, P., Re, E., Wiesemann, M., Zanderighi, G.: MiNNLOP S: a new method to match NNLO QCD to parton showers. JHEP05, 143 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2020)143 arXiv:1908.06987 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: JHEP 02, 031 (2022)] 15

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2020)143 2020

  39. [41]

    Matching NLO QCD with parton shower in Monte Carlo scheme - the KrkNLO method

    Jadach, S., Płaczek, W., Sapeta, S., Siódmok, A., Skrzypek, M.: Matching NLO QCD with parton shower in Monte Carlo scheme — the KrkNLO method. JHEP 10, 052 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2015)052 arXiv:1503.06849 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2015)052 2015

  40. [42]

    Hoeche, S., Krauss, F., Lavesson, N., Lonnblad, L., Mangano, M., Schalicke, A., Schumann, S.: Matching parton showers and matrix elements. In: HERA and the LHC: A Workshop on the Implications of HERA for LHC Physics: CERN - DESY Workshop 2004/2005 (Midterm Meeting, CERN, 11-13 October 2004; Final Meeting, DESY, 17-21 January 2005), pp. 288–289 (2005). htt...

    work page doi:10.5170/cern-2005-014.288 2004

  41. [43]

    QCD Matrix Elements + Parton Showers

    Catani, S., Krauss, F., Kuhn, R., Webber, B.R.: QCD matrix elements + parton showers. JHEP11, 063 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2001/11/063 arXiv:hep-ph/0109231

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2001/11/063 2001

  42. [44]

    MINLO: Multi-scale improved NLO

    Hamilton, K., Nason, P., Zanderighi, G.: MINLO: Multi-Scale Improved NLO. JHEP10, 155 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2012)155 arXiv:1206.3572 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2012)155 2012

  43. [45]

    JHEP10, 091 (2023) https://doi.org/10

    Herren, F., Höche, S., Krauss, F., Reichelt, D., Schoenherr, M.: A new approach to color-coherent parton evolution. JHEP10, 091 (2023) https://doi.org/10. 1007/JHEP10(2023)091 arXiv:2208.06057 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  44. [46]

    Höche, S., Krauss, F., Meinzinger, P., Reichelt, D.: Recoil-Safe Subtraction, Matching and Merging ine+e− →hadrons (2025) arXiv:2507.22837 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  45. [47]

    JHEP10, 038 (2025) https://doi.org/ 10.1007/JHEP10(2025)038 arXiv:2504.05377 [hep-ph]

    Beekveld, M., Ferrario Ravasio, S., Helliwell, J., Karlberg, A., Salam, G.P., Scyboz, L., Soto-Ontoso, A., Soyez, G., Zanoli, S.: Logarithmically-accurate and positive-definite NLO shower matching. JHEP10, 038 (2025) https://doi.org/ 10.1007/JHEP10(2025)038 arXiv:2504.05377 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2025)038 2025

  46. [48]

    Cacciari, M., Salam, G.P.: Pileup subtraction using jet areas. Phys. Lett. B659, 119–126 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2007.09.077 arXiv:0707.1378 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.09.077 2008

  47. [49]

    Sjostrand, T., Zijl, M.: A Multiple Interaction Model for the Event Structure in Hadron Collisions. Phys. Rev. D36, 2019 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.36.2019

    2019

  48. [50]

    Andersson, B., Gustafson, G., Ingelman, G., Sjostrand, T.: Parton Fragmenta- tion and String Dynamics. Phys. Rept.97, 31–145 (1983) https://doi.org/10. 1016/0370-1573(83)90080-7

    1983

  49. [51]

    Amati, D., Veneziano, G.: Preconfinement as a Property of Perturbative QCD. Phys. Lett. B83, 87–92 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(79)90896-7 16

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(79)90896-7 1979

  50. [52]

    Iskauskas, A., Knobbe, M., Krauss, F., Schumann, S.: Robust Calibration of Non-Perturbative Models with History Matching (2026) arXiv:2602.22324 [hep- ph]

    arXiv 2026

  51. [53]

    Buckley, A., Hoeth, H., Lacker, H., Schulz, H., Seggern, J.E.: Systematic event generator tuning for the LHC. Eur. Phys. J. C65, 331–357 (2010) https://doi. org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1196-7 arXiv:0907.2973 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1196-7 2010

  52. [54]

    JINST18(10), 10033 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/18/10/P10033 arXiv:2302.01139 [hep-ph]

    La Cagnina, S., Kröninger, K., Kluth, S., Verbytskyi, A.: A Bayesian tune of the Herwig Monte Carlo event generator. JINST18(10), 10033 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/18/10/P10033 arXiv:2302.01139 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/18/10/p10033 2023

  53. [55]

    SciPost Phys.13(2), 019 (2022) https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.13.2.019 arXiv:2203.11385 [hep-ph]

    Chahal, G.S., Krauss, F.: Cluster Hadronisation in Sherpa. SciPost Phys.13(2), 019 (2022) https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.13.2.019 arXiv:2203.11385 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.13.2.019 2022

  54. [56]

    Antenna Subtraction at NNLO

    Gehrmann-De Ridder, A., Gehrmann, T., Glover, E.W.N.: Antenna subtraction at NNLO. JHEP09, 056 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2005/09/ 056 arXiv:hep-ph/0505111

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/09/ 2005

  55. [57]

    Catani, S., Grazzini, M.: An NNLO subtraction formalism in hadron collisions and its application to Higgs boson production at the LHC. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 222002 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.222002 arXiv:hep- ph/0703012

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.222002 2007

  56. [58]

    Czakon, M.: A novel subtraction scheme for double-real radiation at NNLO. Phys. Lett. B693, 259–268 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2010.08. 036 arXiv:1005.0274 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.08 2010

  57. [60]

    JHEP04, 066 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1007/ JHEP04(2013)066 arXiv:1301.4693 [hep-ph]

    Currie, J., Glover, E.W.N., Wells, S.: Infrared Structure at NNLO Using Antenna Subtraction. JHEP04, 066 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1007/ JHEP04(2013)066 arXiv:1301.4693 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  58. [61]

    Cacciari, M., Dreyer, F.A., Karlberg, A., Salam, G.P., Zanderighi, G.: Fully Differential Vector-Boson-Fusion Higgs Production at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order. Phys. Rev. Lett.115(8), 082002 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.115.082002 arXiv:1506.02660 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 120, 139901 (2018)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  59. [62]

    JHEP09, 058 (2015) https://doi.org/10

    Gaunt, J., Stahlhofen, M., Tackmann, F.J., Walsh, J.R.: N-jettiness Subtrac- tions for NNLO QCD Calculations. JHEP09, 058 (2015) https://doi.org/10. 1007/JHEP09(2015)058 arXiv:1505.04794 [hep-ph] 17

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  60. [63]

    Local Analytic Sector Subtraction at NNLO

    Magnea, L., Maina, E., Pelliccioli, G., Signorile-Signorile, C., Torrielli, P., Uccirati, S.: Local analytic sector subtraction at NNLO. JHEP12, 107 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2018)107 arXiv:1806.09570 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: JHEP 06, 013 (2019)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep12(2018)107 2018

  61. [64]

    Caola, F., Melnikov, K., Röntsch, R.: Nested soft-collinear subtractions in NNLO QCD computations. Eur. Phys. J. C77(4), 248 (2017) https://doi.org/ 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4774-0 arXiv:1702.01352 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4774-0 2017

  62. [65]

    Grazzini, M., Kallweit, S., Wiesemann, M.: Fully differential NNLO computa- tions with MATRIX. Eur. Phys. J. C78(7), 537 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1140/ epjc/s10052-018-5771-7 arXiv:1711.06631 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  63. [66]

    Matching Fully Differential NNLO Calculations and Parton Showers

    Alioli, S., Bauer, C.W., Berggren, C., Tackmann, F.J., Walsh, J.R., Zuberi, S.: Matching Fully Differential NNLO Calculations and Parton Showers. JHEP06, 089 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2014)089 arXiv:1311.0286 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2014)089 2014

  64. [67]

    Höche, S., Li, Y., Prestel, S.: Drell-Yan lepton pair production at NNLO QCD with parton showers. Phys. Rev. D91(7), 074015 (2015) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevD.91.074015 arXiv:1405.3607 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  65. [68]

    Campbell, J.M., Höche, S., Li, H.T., Preuss, C.T., Skands, P.: Towards NNLO+PS matching with sector showers. Phys. Lett. B836, 137614 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137614 arXiv:2108.07133 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137614 2023

  66. [69]

    NNLOPS accurate Drell-Yan production

    Karlberg, A., Re, E., Zanderighi, G.: NNLOPS accurate Drell-Yan pro- duction. JHEP09, 134 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2014)134 arXiv:1407.2940 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep09(2014)134 2014

  67. [70]

    LanHEP - a package for the automatic generation of Feynman rules in field theory. Version 3.0

    Semenov, A.: LanHEP: A Package for the automatic generation of Feynman rules in field theory. Version 3.0. Comput. Phys. Commun.180, 431–454 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2008.10.012 arXiv:0805.0555 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2008.10.012 2009

  68. [71]

    Staub, F.: SARAH 4 : A tool for (not only SUSY) model builders. Comput. Phys. Commun.185, 1773–1790 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2014.02. 018 arXiv:1309.7223 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2014.02 2014

  69. [72]

    Alloul, A., Christensen, N.D., Degrande, C., Duhr, C., Fuks, B.: FeynRules 2.0 - Acompletetoolboxfortree-levelphenomenology.Comput.Phys.Commun.185, 2250–2300 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2014.04.012 arXiv:1310.1921 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2014.04.012 2014

  70. [73]

    Degrande, C., Duhr, C., Fuks, B., Graudenz, D., Maltoni, F., Reuter, J., Wiedemann, U.: UFO - The Universal FeynRules Output. Comput. Phys. Commun.183, 1201–1214 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2012.01.022 arXiv:1108.2040 [hep-ph] 18

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2012.01.022 2012

  71. [74]

    SciPost Phys

    Darmé, L.,et al.: UFO 2.0: the Universal Feynman Output format. SciPost Phys. Codeb.2023, 27 (2023) https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.27 arXiv:2304.09883 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.27 2023

  72. [75]

    JHEP 12, 008 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2019)008 arXiv:1907.04898 [hep-ph]

    Frixione, S., Fuks, B., Hirschi, V., Mawatari, K., Shao, H.-S., Sunder, P.A., Zaro, M.: Automated simulations beyond the Standard Model: supersymmetry. JHEP 12, 008 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2019)008 arXiv:1907.04898 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2019)008 2019

  73. [77]

    Stienemeier, P., Braß, S., Bredt, P., Kilian, W., Kreher, N., Ohl, T., Reuter, J., Rothe,V., Striegl,T.:WHIZARD3.0: StatusandNews (2021) arXiv:2104.11141 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  74. [78]

    Degrande, C., Durieux, G., Maltoni, F., Mimasu, K., Vryonidou, E., Zhang, C.: Automated one-loop computations in the SMEFT. Phys. Rev. D103, 096024 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.096024 arXiv:2008.11743 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.096024 2021

  75. [79]

    Hoeche, S., Krauss, F., Pozzorini, S., Schoenherr, M., Thompson, J.M., Zapp, K.C.: Triple vector boson production through Higgs-Strahlung with NLO mul- tijet merging. Phys. Rev. D89(9), 093015 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.89.093015 arXiv:1403.7516 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  76. [80]

    Buckley and others , journal=

    Buckley, A.,et al.: Testing new physics models with global comparisons to collider measurements: the Contur toolkit. SciPost Phys. Core4, 013 (2021) https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.4.2.013 arXiv:2102.04377 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyscore.4.2.013 2021

  77. [81]

    Degrande, C., Maltoni, F., Wang, J., Zhang, C.: Automatic computations at next-to-leading order in QCD for top-quark flavor-changing neutral processes. Phys. Rev. D91, 034027 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.034027 arXiv:1407.6506 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.034027 2015

  78. [82]

    Automated event generation for loop-induced processes

    Hirschi, V., Mattelaer, O.: Automated event generation for loop-induced processes. JHEP10, 146 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2015)146 arXiv:1507.00020 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2015)146 2015

  79. [83]

    CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs, vol

    Altmann, J.,et al.: ECFA Higgs, Electroweak, and Top Factory Study. CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs, vol. 5/2025 (2025). https://doi.org/10.23731/ CYRM-2025-005

    2025

  80. [84]

    Dong, M., et al.: CEPC Conceptual Design Report: Volume 2 - Physics & Detector (2018) arXiv:1811.10545 [hep-ex] 19

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

Showing first 80 references.