pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.22788 · v2 · pith:FZ6K235Nnew · submitted 2026-06-22 · ✦ hep-th · math-ph· math.MP· nucl-th

Quantized Irreversible Null-geometry: Foundation and Applications

Si-xue Qin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 05:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th math-phmath.MPnucl-th
keywords null-geometryPoisson point processesUV-finite field theorydark energyStandard Model hierarchiesemergent quantum mechanicscosmic microwave backgroundquantum gravity
0
0 comments X

The pith

A framework of quantized irreversible null-geometry uses Poisson point process statistics to regularize quantum fluctuations and derive a 6 TeV field cutoff along with emergent quantum mechanics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a framework rooted in the statistics of discrete Poisson point processes to formulate a consistent integration measure for quantum geometric fluctuations that preserves diffeomorphism invariance. This produces a double-exponential probability functional with a capacity limit that suppresses ultraviolet singularities. The stochastic action undergoes a statistical bifurcation at macroscopic scales: the mean condenses into classical continuous spacetime and matter, while the Law of Large Numbers maps residual noise into an infrared zero-mean Gaussian martingale that generates standard quantum kinematic effects. Separation of the variance from the nonlinear action rectifies it into a macroscopic drift identified as dark energy density, which after dilution by Bekenstein-Hawking entropy sets a continuous field cutoff at 6 TeV. The same framework is then used to build a UV-finite effective field theory, a topological particle model, a non-singular cosmology, and emergent quantum mechanics axioms.

Core claim

The central claim is that quantized irreversible null-geometry, formulated through statistics of discrete Poisson point processes, supplies a double-exponential probability functional that regularizes amplitudes and enables a bifurcation of the stochastic action; the macroscopic mean defines classical spacetime while residual ultraviolet noise produces quantum kinematics and, after linear separation from the nonlinear action, a rectified drift identified with dark energy, yielding a UV-finite synthesis that predicts a 6 TeV cutoff and derives Standard Model hierarchies, CMB power suppression, and quantum axioms as statistical effects.

What carries the argument

The double-exponential probability functional arising from discrete Poisson point processes, which imposes a capacity limit that regularizes amplitudes and suppresses ultraviolet singularities while preserving diffeomorphism invariance.

If this is right

  • A UV-finite effective field theory preserving gauge symmetries in 4D can be constructed within the framework.
  • A topological model of particles can be built that derives Standard Model hierarchies.
  • A non-singular cosmological model can be formulated that predicts the observed large-scale power suppression in the cosmic microwave background.
  • Foundational axioms of quantum mechanics can be derived as emergent statistical phenomenologies.
  • Dilution of bulk variance by Bekenstein-Hawking entropy fixes a continuous field cutoff at 6 TeV.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Collider experiments above a few TeV could directly test for the predicted cutoff as a falsifiable signature.
  • The statistical origin of quantum kinematics might offer a route to derive measurement postulates without additional axioms.
  • The dark-energy identification could be checked against independent cosmological data on the equation of state.
  • The topological particle construction might be extended to compute specific mass ratios or mixing angles for comparison with experiment.

Load-bearing premise

The residual ultraviolet noise, once mapped by the Law of Large Numbers to an infrared zero-mean Gaussian martingale, can be linearly separated from the nonlinear exponential action so that the remaining variance rectifies into a macroscopic drift identified with dark energy density.

What would settle it

A collider measurement that either confirms or rules out a sharp cutoff in continuous field modes at precisely 6 TeV, or a high-precision CMB survey that either matches or deviates from the specific large-scale power suppression pattern predicted by the non-singular cosmological model.

read the original abstract

Formulating a consistent integration measure for quantum geometric fluctuations without violating diffeomorphism invariance remains a theoretical challenge. In this work, a framework rooted in the statistics of discrete Poisson point processes is proposed. The formulation yields a double-exponential probability functional characterized by a capacity limit, which acts as an amplitude regularizer suppressing ultraviolet singularities. To evaluate this model at macroscopic scales, a statistical bifurcation of the stochastic action is identified. First, the macroscopic mean condenses to define the classical continuous spacetime background and its matter distribution. Second, at macroscopic scales, the Law of Large Numbers dictates that the residual ultraviolet noise maps into an infrared continuous zero-mean Gaussian martingale within the bulk. Third, this zero-mean Gaussian noise linearly generates standard quantum kinematic effects. Fourth, evaluating the non-linear exponential action separates the variance of this Gaussian noise from the linear cancellation, rectifying it into a macroscopic drift that manifests as the dark energy density. Diluted by the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of the observable universe, this bulk variance dictates a continuous field cutoff at 6 TeV. Building upon this framework, broad phenomenological applications are demonstrated: (1) establishing a UV-finite effective field theory preserving gauge symmetries in 4D; (2) constructing a topological model of particles deriving Standard Model hierarchies; (3) formulating a non-singular cosmological model predicting observed large-scale power suppression in the cosmic microwave background; and (4) deriving foundational axioms of quantum mechanics as emergent statistical phenomenologies. Collectively, this framework provides a falsifiable synthesis bridging discrete quantum geometry and continuous macroscopic physics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a framework for quantized irreversible null-geometry rooted in the statistics of discrete Poisson point processes. It introduces a double-exponential probability functional with a capacity limit acting as an amplitude regularizer. A statistical bifurcation is identified: the macroscopic mean defines classical continuous spacetime, the Law of Large Numbers maps residual UV noise to an IR zero-mean Gaussian martingale generating quantum kinematics, and evaluation of the nonlinear exponential action rectifies the Gaussian variance into a macroscopic drift identified with dark energy density. Dilution of this bulk variance by the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of the observable universe is stated to fix a continuous field cutoff at 6 TeV. The framework is applied to a UV-finite 4D EFT preserving gauge symmetries, a topological model deriving Standard Model hierarchies, a non-singular cosmology predicting CMB large-scale power suppression, and emergent derivations of quantum mechanics axioms.

Significance. If the unshown mappings hold, the work would offer a potentially significant synthesis bridging discrete quantum geometry and continuous macroscopic physics under a single statistical framework, with explicit falsifiable predictions such as the 6 TeV cutoff and CMB power suppression. The breadth of claimed applications (UV-finite EFT, SM hierarchies, cosmology, emergent QM) would be noteworthy if the central derivations are supplied and shown to be independent of parameter tuning.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract, fourth enumerated step: The assertion that 'evaluating the non-linear exponential action separates the variance of this Gaussian noise from the linear cancellation, rectifying it into a macroscopic drift' is stated without any explicit calculation, series expansion, or identity showing how a zero-mean Gaussian martingale produces a nonzero mean drift while preserving the preceding linear cancellation. This step is load-bearing for the dark-energy identification and the 6 TeV cutoff.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract, dilution claim: The bulk variance is described as dictating a 6 TeV cutoff after dilution by Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, yet no independent derivation or external benchmark for the variance value is supplied; the construction reduces to adjusting the variance to reproduce the observed dark-energy density, rendering the cutoff a fit rather than a prediction from first principles.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract, applications (1)–(4): All listed phenomenological results (UV-finite EFT, topological SM model, non-singular cosmology, emergent QM) inherit the validity of the unshown rectification step; without a demonstrated separation of variance from the nonlinear action, these applications rest on the same unsupported identification.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains no equations, intermediate steps, or error estimates, rendering the central identifications impossible to verify from the provided text.
  2. [Abstract] Notation for the 'capacity limit' and 'bulk variance' is introduced without prior definition or relation to standard Poisson-process parameters.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and for identifying points where the presentation of key steps can be strengthened. We address each major comment below with references to the manuscript and indicate where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract, fourth enumerated step: The assertion that 'evaluating the non-linear exponential action separates the variance of this Gaussian noise from the linear cancellation, rectifying it into a macroscopic drift' is stated without any explicit calculation, series expansion, or identity showing how a zero-mean Gaussian martingale produces a nonzero mean drift while preserving the preceding linear cancellation. This step is load-bearing for the dark-energy identification and the 6 TeV cutoff.

    Authors: The comment correctly notes that the abstract states the rectification without an explicit expansion. The full manuscript derives this in Section 4 by expanding the nonlinear exponential action to quadratic order in the fluctuations of the zero-mean Gaussian martingale; the linear term vanishes by the zero-mean property while the quadratic term isolates a positive drift proportional to the variance. We will revise the abstract to include a concise outline of this expansion and add an explicit series identity for clarity. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract, dilution claim: The bulk variance is described as dictating a 6 TeV cutoff after dilution by Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, yet no independent derivation or external benchmark for the variance value is supplied; the construction reduces to adjusting the variance to reproduce the observed dark-energy density, rendering the cutoff a fit rather than a prediction from first principles.

    Authors: The variance is fixed by the Poisson process statistics and capacity limit of the double-exponential functional (Sections 2–3). The dilution by Bekenstein-Hawking entropy then yields the cutoff scale. We acknowledge that matching the observed dark-energy density is used to set the overall normalization, so the 6 TeV value is a derived prediction within that normalization rather than an absolute first-principles number independent of any observational input. We will add a clarifying paragraph in the revision distinguishing the model-derived variance from the observational normalization step. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract, applications (1)–(4): All listed phenomenological results (UV-finite EFT, topological SM model, non-singular cosmology, emergent QM) inherit the validity of the unshown rectification step; without a demonstrated separation of variance from the nonlinear action, these applications rest on the same unsupported identification.

    Authors: The applications in Sections 5–8 are constructed directly from the statistical bifurcation once the rectification is established. With the explicit expansion added per the first comment, the inheritance is justified. We will insert forward references from each application section back to the rectification derivation in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Bulk variance fitted to dark-energy density to obtain 6 TeV cutoff by construction

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract, fourth enumerated step]
    "Fourth, evaluating the non-linear exponential action separates the variance of this Gaussian noise from the linear cancellation, rectifying it into a macroeconomic drift that manifests as the dark energy density. Diluted by the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of the observable universe, this bulk variance dictates a continuous field cutoff at 6 TeV."

    The variance is not derived from an independent principle or external benchmark; it is implicitly set so that, after dilution by Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, it reproduces the observed dark-energy density. The 6 TeV cutoff is therefore a post-hoc consequence of this choice rather than a prediction.

full rationale

The central bridge from discrete Poisson statistics to macroscopic physics rests on an unshown separation in the nonlinear exponential action that rectifies zero-mean Gaussian martingale variance into a macroscopic drift identified with dark-energy density. The 6 TeV cutoff is then obtained by diluting this variance with standard Bekenstein-Hawking entropy. No explicit expansion, identity, or independent derivation is supplied for the rectification step; the variance amplitude is therefore adjusted to match observed dark-energy density, rendering the cutoff a direct consequence of that fit rather than an independent first-principles result. All listed phenomenological applications inherit this step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 2 invented entities

The framework rests on an unproven domain assumption that Poisson statistics can furnish a diffeomorphism-invariant integration measure, plus several invented entities (capacity limit, macroscopic drift) introduced without independent falsifiable handles; the variance parameter used for dark energy is effectively fitted to observed cosmology.

free parameters (2)
  • capacity limit
    Introduced as the amplitude regularizer in the double-exponential functional; its value is not derived from first principles in the abstract.
  • bulk variance
    Chosen so that, after dilution by Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, it reproduces the observed dark-energy density and yields the 6 TeV cutoff.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Statistics of discrete Poisson point processes can formulate a consistent integration measure for quantum geometric fluctuations without violating diffeomorphism invariance.
    Stated as the root of the entire construction in the opening sentence of the abstract.
invented entities (2)
  • capacity limit no independent evidence
    purpose: Amplitude regularizer suppressing ultraviolet singularities in the probability functional
    New entity introduced as part of the double-exponential functional; no independent evidence supplied.
  • macroscopic drift from rectified Gaussian noise no independent evidence
    purpose: Manifests as the dark energy density after linear cancellation
    Postulated mapping from the nonlinear exponential action; no external falsifiable handle given.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5814 in / 2161 out tokens · 41075 ms · 2026-06-29T05:09:20.734460+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Weinberg,The cosmological constant problem,Rev

    S. Weinberg,The cosmological constant problem,Rev. Mod. Phys.61(1989) 1–23

    1989

  2. [2]

    Martin,Everything you always wanted to know about the cosmological constant problem (but were afraid to ask),Comptes Rendus Physique13(2012) 566–665

    J. Martin,Everything you always wanted to know about the cosmological constant problem (but were afraid to ask),Comptes Rendus Physique13(2012) 566–665

    2012

  3. [3]

    Schwartz,Sur l’impossibilit´ e de la multiplication des distributions,Comptes Rendus de l’Acad´ emie des Sciences239(1954) 847

    L. Schwartz,Sur l’impossibilit´ e de la multiplication des distributions,Comptes Rendus de l’Acad´ emie des Sciences239(1954) 847

    1954

  4. [4]

    J. D. Bekenstein,Universal upper bound on the entropy-to-energy ratio for bounded systems, Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 287–298

    1981

  5. [5]

    Bousso,The holographic principle,Rev

    R. Bousso,The holographic principle,Rev. Mod. Phys.74(2002) 825. – 83 –

    2002

  6. [6]

    M. D. Donsker,An invariance principle for certain probability limit theorems,Mem. Amer. Math. Soc.6(1951) 1–12

    1951

  7. [7]

    K. G. Wilson,Renormalization group and critical phenomena. I. Renormalization group and the Kadanoff scaling picture,Phys. Rev. B4(1971) 3174

    1971

  8. [8]

    M. H. Freedman,The topology of four-dimensional manifolds,J. Differential Geom.17 (1982) 357

    1982

  9. [9]

    S. K. Donaldson,An application of gauge theory to four-dimensional topology,J. Differential Geom.18(1983) 279

    1983

  10. [10]

    Bombelli, J

    L. Bombelli, J. Lee, D. Meyer, and R. D. Sorkin,Space-time as a causal set,Phys. Rev. Lett. 59(1987) 521

    1987

  11. [11]

    Campbell,The study of discontinuous phenomena,Proc

    N. Campbell,The study of discontinuous phenomena,Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc.15(1909) 117

    1909

  12. [12]

    D. J. Daley and D. Vere-Jones,An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes, Springer, New York (2003)

    2003

  13. [13]

    L´ evy,Th´ eorie de l’addition des variables al´ eatoires, Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1954)

    P. L´ evy,Th´ eorie de l’addition des variables al´ eatoires, Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1954)

    1954

  14. [14]

    Y. B. Zeldovich,Cosmological constant and elementary particles,JETP Lett.6(1967) 316

    1967

  15. [15]

    Aghanimet al.[Planck Collaboration],Planck 2018 results

    N. Aghanimet al.[Planck Collaboration],Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A6

    2018

  16. [16]

    M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder,An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, Addison-Wesley (1995)

    1995

  17. [17]

    Schwinger,On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization,Phys

    J. Schwinger,On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization,Phys. Rev.82(1951) 664

    1951

  18. [18]

    R. P. Feynman,Space-time approach to quantum electrodynamics,Phys. Rev.76(1949) 769

    1949

  19. [19]

    F. J. Dyson,Divergence of perturbation theory in quantum electrodynamics,Phys. Rev.85 (1952) 631

    1952

  20. [20]

    ’t Hooft and M

    G. ’t Hooft and M. Veltman,Regularization and renormalization of gauge fields,Nucl. Phys. B44(1972) 189

    1972

  21. [21]

    Qin,Quantized Irreversible Null-geometry,Preprint(2026)

    S.-X. Qin,Quantized Irreversible Null-geometry,Preprint(2026)

    2026

  22. [22]

    Wetterich,Exact evolution equation for the effective potential,Phys

    C. Wetterich,Exact evolution equation for the effective potential,Phys. Lett. B301(1993) 90

    1993

  23. [23]

    J. C. Ward,An Identity in Quantum Electrodynamics,Phys. Rev.78(1950) 182

    1950

  24. [24]

    Takahashi,On the generalized Ward identity,Nuovo Cim.6(1957) 371

    Y. Takahashi,On the generalized Ward identity,Nuovo Cim.6(1957) 371

    1957

  25. [25]

    A. A. Slavnov,Ward identities in gauge theories,Theor. Math. Phys.10(1972) 99

    1972

  26. [26]

    J. C. Taylor,Ward identities and charge renormalization of the Yang-Mills field,Nucl. Phys. B33(1971) 436

    1971

  27. [27]

    R. M. Wilcox,Exponential operators and parameter differentiation in quantum mechanics,J. Math. Phys.8(1967) 962

    1967

  28. [28]

    Ostrogradsky,M´ emoires sur les ´ equations diff´ erentielles relatives au probl` eme des isop´ erim` etres,Mem

    M. Ostrogradsky,M´ emoires sur les ´ equations diff´ erentielles relatives au probl` eme des isop´ erim` etres,Mem. Acad. St. Petersbourg6(1850) 385

  29. [29]

    S. N. Bernstein,Sur les fonctions absolument monotones,Acta Math.52(1929) 1. – 84 –

    1929

  30. [30]

    K¨ all¨ en,On the definition of the Renormalization Constants in Quantum Electrodynamics, Helv

    G. K¨ all¨ en,On the definition of the Renormalization Constants in Quantum Electrodynamics, Helv. Phys. Acta25(1952) 417

    1952

  31. [31]

    Lehmann, ¨Uber Eigenschaften von Ausbreitungsfunktionen und Renormierungskonstanten quantisierter Felder,Nuovo Cim.11(1954) 342

    H. Lehmann, ¨Uber Eigenschaften von Ausbreitungsfunktionen und Renormierungskonstanten quantisierter Felder,Nuovo Cim.11(1954) 342

    1954

  32. [32]

    H. F. Trotter,On the product of semi-groups of operators,Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.10(1959) 545

    1959

  33. [33]

    Symanzik,Small distance behaviour in field theory and power counting,Commun

    K. Symanzik,Small distance behaviour in field theory and power counting,Commun. Math. Phys.18(1970) 227

    1970

  34. [34]

    N. N. Bogoliubov and O. S. Parasiuk, ¨Uber die Multiplikation der Kausalfunktionen in der Quantentheorie der Felder,Acta Math.97(1957) 227

    1957

  35. [35]

    Hepp,Proof of the Bogoliubov-Parasiuk theorem on renormalization,Commun

    K. Hepp,Proof of the Bogoliubov-Parasiuk theorem on renormalization,Commun. Math. Phys.2(1966) 301

    1966

  36. [36]

    Zimmermann,Convergence of Bogolyubov’s method of renormalization in momentum space,Commun

    W. Zimmermann,Convergence of Bogolyubov’s method of renormalization in momentum space,Commun. Math. Phys.15(1969) 208

    1969

  37. [37]

    Passarino and M

    G. Passarino and M. Veltman,One-loop corrections fore +e− annihilation intoµ +µ− in the Weinberg model,Nucl. Phys. B160(1979) 151

    1979

  38. [38]

    Navaset al.[Particle Data Group],Review of Particle Physics,Phys

    S. Navaset al.[Particle Data Group],Review of Particle Physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001

    2024

  39. [39]

    F. J. Dyson,TheSmatrix in quantum electrodynamics,Phys. Rev.75(1949) 1736

    1949

  40. [40]

    M. F. Atiyah and I. M. Singer,The index of elliptic operators: I,Ann. of Math.87(1968) 484–530

    1968

  41. [41]

    ’t Hooft,Computation of the quantum effects due to a four-dimensional pseudoparticle, Phys

    G. ’t Hooft,Computation of the quantum effects due to a four-dimensional pseudoparticle, Phys. Rev. D14(1976) 3432–3450

    1976

  42. [42]

    J. W. York,Conformally invariant orthogonal decomposition of symmetric tensors on Riemannian manifolds,J. Math. Phys.14(1973) 456–464

    1973

  43. [43]

    Coleman and E

    S. Coleman and E. Weinberg,Radiative Corrections as the Origin of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. D7(1973) 1888–1910

    1973

  44. [44]

    Georgi and S

    H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow,Unity of All Elementary-Particle Forces,Phys. Rev. Lett.32 (1974) 438–441

    1974

  45. [45]

    Chern,Characteristic classes of Hermitian manifolds,Ann

    S.-S. Chern,Characteristic classes of Hermitian manifolds,Ann. of Math.47(1946) 85–121

    1946

  46. [46]

    Chern,A simple intrinsic proof of the Gauss-Bonnet formula for closed Riemannian manifolds,Ann

    S.-S. Chern,A simple intrinsic proof of the Gauss-Bonnet formula for closed Riemannian manifolds,Ann. of Math.45(1944) 747–752

    1944

  47. [47]

    M. F. Atiyah, V. K. Patodi, and I. M. Singer,Spectral asymmetry and Riemannian Geometry. I,Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.77(1975) 43–69

    1975

  48. [48]

    Hirzebruch and D

    F. Hirzebruch and D. Zagier,The Atiyah-Singer Theorem and Elementary Number Theory, Publish or Perish, Boston (1974)

    1974

  49. [49]

    Koide,New view of quark and lepton mass hierarchy,Phys

    Y. Koide,New view of quark and lepton mass hierarchy,Phys. Rev. D28(1983) 252–254

    1983

  50. [50]

    Esteban, M

    I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz, and A. Zhou,The fate of hints: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,JHEP09(2020) 178

    2020

  51. [51]

    S. L. Adler,Axial-vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics,Phys. Rev.177(1969) 2426–2438. – 85 –

    1969

  52. [52]

    J. S. Bell and R. Jackiw,A PCAC puzzle:π 0 →γγin theσ-model,Nuovo Cim. A60(1969) 47–61

    1969

  53. [53]

    Pendleton and G

    B. Pendleton and G. G. Ross,Mass and mixing angle predictions from infrared fixed points, Phys. Lett. B98(1981) 291–294

    1981

  54. [54]

    F. W. Hehl, P. von der Heyde, G. D. Kerlick, and J. M. Nester,General relativity with spin and torsion,Rev. Mod. Phys.48(1976) 393–416

    1976

  55. [55]

    J. B. Albertet al.[nEXO Collaboration],Sensitivity and discovery potential of nEXO to neutrinoless double beta decay,Phys. Rev. C97(2018) 065503

    2018

  56. [56]

    Abgrallet al.(LEGEND), The Large Enriched Germanium Experiment for NeutrinolessββDecay: LEGEND-1000 Preconceptual Design Report (2021), arXiv:2107.11462 [physics.ins-det]

    N. Abgrallet al.[LEGEND Collaboration],The Large Enriched Germanium Experiment for NeutrinolessββDecay: LEGEND-1000 Preconceptual Design Report, arXiv:2107.11462 (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  57. [57]

    Afanacievet al.[MEG II Collaboration],A search forµ + →e +γwith the first dataset of the MEG II experiment,Eur

    K. Afanacievet al.[MEG II Collaboration],A search forµ + →e +γwith the first dataset of the MEG II experiment,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 216

    2024

  58. [58]

    Mu2e Technical Design Report

    L. Bartoszeket al.[Mu2e Collaboration],Mu2e Technical Design Report, arXiv:1501.05241 (2015)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  59. [59]

    Apollinariet al.,High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC): Preliminary Design Report, CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs (2015)

    G. Apollinariet al.,High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC): Preliminary Design Report, CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs (2015)

    2015

  60. [60]

    Abadaet al.[FCC Collaboration],FCC-hh: The Hadron Collider,Eur

    A. Abadaet al.[FCC Collaboration],FCC-hh: The Hadron Collider,Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top.228(2019) 755

    2019

  61. [61]

    Penrose,Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities,Phys

    R. Penrose,Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities,Phys. Rev. Lett.14(1965) 57

    1965

  62. [62]

    S. W. Hawking and R. Penrose,The singularities of gravitational collapse and cosmology, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A314(1970) 529

    1970

  63. [63]

    A. H. Guth,The inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 347

    1981

  64. [64]

    Touchette,The large deviation approach to statistical mechanics,Phys

    H. Touchette,The large deviation approach to statistical mechanics,Phys. Rep.478(2009) 1

    2009

  65. [65]

    J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking,Wave function of the Universe,Phys. Rev. D28(1983) 2960

    1983

  66. [66]

    M. J. Duff,Twenty years of the Weyl anomaly,Class. Quant. Grav.11(1994) 1387

    1994

  67. [67]

    Applebaum,L´ evy Processes and Stochastic Calculus, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    D. Applebaum,L´ evy Processes and Stochastic Calculus, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    2009

  68. [68]

    C. L. Bennettet al.[WMAP Collaboration],Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Final Maps and Results,Astrophys. J. Suppl.208(2013) 20

    2013

  69. [69]

    Akramiet al.[Planck Collaboration],Planck 2018 results

    Y. Akramiet al.[Planck Collaboration],Planck 2018 results. VII. Isotropy and statistics of the CMB,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A7

    2018

  70. [70]

    K. S. Thorne, R. H. Price and D. A. Macdonald,Black Holes: The Membrane Paradigm, Yale University Press (1986)

    1986

  71. [71]

    N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge University Press (1982)

    1982

  72. [72]

    Israel,Event horizons in static vacuum space-times,Phys

    W. Israel,Event horizons in static vacuum space-times,Phys. Rev.164(1967) 1776. – 86 –

    1967

  73. [73]

    Carter,Axisymmetric black hole has only two degrees of freedom,Phys

    B. Carter,Axisymmetric black hole has only two degrees of freedom,Phys. Rev. Lett.26 (1971) 331

    1971

  74. [74]

    Bousso,A Covariant Entropy Conjecture,JHEP07(1999) 004

    R. Bousso,A Covariant Entropy Conjecture,JHEP07(1999) 004

    1999

  75. [75]

    J. D. Bekenstein and V. F. Mukhanov,Spectroscopy of the quantum black hole,Phys. Lett. B 360(1995) 7

    1995

  76. [76]

    S. W. Hawking,Particle creation by black holes,Commun. Math. Phys.43(1975) 199

    1975

  77. [77]

    R. K. Kaul and P. Majumdar,Logarithmic correction to the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett.84(2000) 5255

    2000

  78. [78]

    S. W. Hawking,Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse,Phys. Rev. D14(1976) 2460

    1976

  79. [79]

    J. H. MacGibbon,Quark- and gluon-jet emission from primordial black holes: The kinematics,Nature329(1987) 308–309

    1987

  80. [80]

    Chluba and R

    J. Chluba and R. A. Sunyaev,The evolution of CMB spectral distortions in the early Universe,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.419(2012) 1294–1314

    2012

Showing first 80 references.