Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Coupled atmospHere Interior modeL Intercomparison (CHILI). I. Evolutionary Modelling -- Primordial Magma Oceans of Earth and Venus

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-25 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Intercomparison of coupled models shows Earth's magma ocean solidifies in under 4 million years while Venus scenarios allow for up to 50 million years.

desk verdict CHILI's first paper shows Earth magma ocean models converge on short solidification times while Venus ones vary more with initial volatiles, but the inter-model spread is large and not quantified in detail. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.24757 v1 pith:LHATTIPQ submitted 2026-06-23 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.IMphysics.geo-ph

Harrison Nicholls , Joshua Krissansen-Totton , Tim Lichtenberg , Laura Schaefer , Keiko Hamano , Maxime Maurice , Henri Samuel , Alexandra Papesh
show 17 more authors
Carlos Ortiz-Quintana Junellie Perez Yamila Miguel Denis Sergeev Philipp Baumeister Spanan Dash Leoni Janssen Jonathan Keathley Alexandre de Larminat Emmanuel Marcq Lena Noack Hugo Pelissard Bo Peng Emma Postolec Ramses Ramirez Mariana Sastre Andrea Zorzi
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.IMphysics.geo-ph
keywords magmaoceanEarthevolutionVenusmodelintercomparisonatmosphere-interiorcouplingvolatileoutgassingplanetarythermal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first results from the CHILI project benchmarking multiple codes that simulate coupled interior and atmosphere evolution during the magma ocean phase for Earth and Venus. Nominal Earth models converge on solidification timescales within 4 Myr that align with constraints from Earth's early geological record. Venus models produce more varied outcomes, with some cases sustaining molten stages for as long as 50 Myr depending on starting volatile budgets and code-specific choices. The spread in results traces primarily to differences in how each model treats volatile partitioning, vertical energy transport, mantle convection, melting curves, and radiative transfer. These findings highlight which physical treatments most affect predicted evolutionary paths and atmospheres for the two planets.

What carries the argument

The CHILI intercomparison of multiple coupled atmosphere-interior codes, where differences in volatile partitioning, mantle geodynamics, convection, and radiative transfer produce the observed spread in solidification timescales and atmospheric outcomes.

What would settle it

New geological or geochemical evidence showing that Earth's magma ocean lasted substantially longer than 4 Myr or that Venus never sustained one beyond a few Myr would directly test the nominal model predictions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that when several coupled atmosphere-interior evolution codes are applied to identical Earth and Venus initial conditions, they produce short and consistent magma ocean lifetimes for Earth but longer and more divergent lifetimes for Venus, with cooling rates correlating to initial hydrogen and carbon inventories and generated atmospheres commonly exceeding 100 bar surface pressure in C-H-O compositions.

Load-bearing premise

The observed differences between models arise mainly from their distinct treatments of volatile partitioning, energy transport, and mantle properties rather than from any shared approximations or input choices common to all codes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Earth's magma ocean phase ends rapidly and consistently across models within 4 Myr of thermal evolution.
  • Venus can maintain prolonged magma ocean stages for up to 50 Myr under certain initial conditions and model assumptions.
  • Cooling timescales scale with the initial budgets of hydrogen and carbon.
  • Outgassed atmospheres from these stages tend to reach surface pressures above 100 bar with C-H-O compositions.
  • Model variance is driven by choices in volatile partitioning, mantle viscosity, melting curves, and radiative transfer.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Standardizing the identified sensitive treatments across codes could narrow uncertainty ranges when applying the same models to exoplanets.
  • The reported sensitivities point to specific laboratory experiments on volatile solubility and mantle rheology that would most reduce model spread.
  • These timescale differences could help explain the divergent water histories of Earth and Venus if linked to escape processes.
  • Extending the intercomparison to other terrestrial planet scenarios would test whether the Earth-Venus contrast generalizes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Request a human review

A listed scientist reviews the paper for a fee and the review publishes here regardless of verdict. See the reviewers or get listed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents the first results from the CHILI intercomparison project, in which multiple independent coupled atmosphere-interior evolution codes are benchmarked on the primordial magma-ocean solidification phase for Earth and Venus. Nominal Earth models are reported to solidify within 4 Myr and to be consistent with empirical constraints on early Earth; Venus models exhibit greater diversity, with some cases sustaining magma oceans for up to 50 Myr. Cooling timescales are stated to correlate with initial hydrogen and carbon budgets, while substantial inter-model variance is attributed to differences in volatile partitioning, vertical energy transport, mantle geodynamics, convection, melting curves, rheological properties, and radiative transfer. High-pressure (>100 bar) C-H-O atmospheres are favored across the ensemble.

Significance. If the reported ranges and attribution of variance hold, the work is significant because it systematically identifies key sensitivities in volatile handling, escape, and radiative transfer that affect interpretations of terrestrial-planet early histories and exoplanet observations. The participation of multiple independent modeling groups constitutes a clear methodological strength that lowers circularity risk relative to single-code studies.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claims that Earth models solidify 'within 4 Myr' and are 'consistent with empirical constraints,' and that Venus models can sustain magma oceans for '50 Myr,' are presented without the individual model outputs, standard deviations, or quantitative error bars needed to assess robustness or the magnitude of inter-model spread.
  2. [Results/Discussion] Results/Discussion: the attribution of inter-model variance primarily to differences in volatile partitioning, vertical energy transport, mantle geodynamics, convection, melting curves, rheology, and radiative transfer is stated without quantitative sensitivity tests or isolation of these effects from possible shared approximations (e.g., common initial-condition choices or equation-of-state assumptions) across the participating codes.
minor comments (2)
  1. The term 'nominal' models is used repeatedly but never explicitly defined with respect to the exact parameter values or selection criteria applied by each group.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from a table or figure that tabulates the initial H and C budgets adopted by each participating code alongside the resulting solidification times.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on our CHILI intercomparison manuscript. The points raised highlight opportunities to improve the clarity of our summary claims and the discussion of model differences. We address each major comment below and indicate planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claims that Earth models solidify 'within 4 Myr' and are 'consistent with empirical constraints,' and that Venus models can sustain magma oceans for '50 Myr,' are presented without the individual model outputs, standard deviations, or quantitative error bars needed to assess robustness or the magnitude of inter-model spread.

    Authors: The abstract is intended as a concise summary of the primary outcomes from the ensemble of models. Individual model results, including the spread in solidification timescales, are presented in the results section with accompanying figures and tables. To better convey robustness, we will revise the abstract to explicitly note the range of outcomes across participating codes and the presence of inter-model variability. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results/Discussion] Results/Discussion: the attribution of inter-model variance primarily to differences in volatile partitioning, vertical energy transport, mantle geodynamics, convection, melting curves, rheology, and radiative transfer is stated without quantitative sensitivity tests or isolation of these effects from possible shared approximations (e.g., common initial-condition choices or equation-of-state assumptions) across the participating codes.

    Authors: The variance attribution follows directly from the documented differences in physical treatments and parameterizations among the independent codes. This initial intercomparison phase did not include dedicated one-at-a-time sensitivity experiments to isolate every factor. We will add a dedicated paragraph in the discussion that explicitly lists shared assumptions (initial conditions, EOS choices) across the ensemble and flags the need for targeted sensitivity studies in future CHILI phases. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; results are simulation outputs from independent codes

full rationale

The paper reports outcomes of an intercomparison project (CHILI) involving multiple independent modeling groups running their own codes on Earth and Venus magma ocean scenarios. The central claims—Earth solidification within 4 Myr and Venus up to 50 Myr under some conditions—are direct simulation results from nominal runs, not a derivation that reduces to fitted parameters or self-defined quantities within this manuscript. No equations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are presented that could exhibit self-definitional, fitted-input, or self-citation circularity. The attribution of inter-model variance to differences in volatile partitioning, energy transport, and other treatments is consistent with the benchmarking purpose and does not rely on any load-bearing self-citation chain. The work is self-contained as a report of cross-code empirical outputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the premise that participating codes differ mainly in the listed physical treatments and that initial volatile budgets are the dominant control on cooling timescales. No explicit free parameters are named, but initial H and C budgets function as varied inputs. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • initial hydrogen and carbon budgets
    Cooling timescales are stated to correlate with these budgets across models, implying they are varied inputs that influence outcomes.
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Different parametrisations of mantle geodynamics, convection, melting curves, rheological properties, and radiative transfer are the primary sources of divergent evolutionary behaviours
    Invoked to explain inter-model variance in the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Coupled atmospHere Interior modeL Intercomparison (CHILI). I. Evolutionary Modelling -- Primordial Magma Oceans of Earth and Venus." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LHATTIPQ

@misc{pith2026260624757,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Coupled atmospHere Interior modeL Intercomparison (CHILI). I. Evolutionary Modelling -- Primordial Magma Oceans of Earth and Venus},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LHATTIPQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.24757}
}
read the original abstract

Earth and Venus represent two evolutionary outcomes arising from initially molten 'magma ocean' periods, followed by lifetimes of chemical and geophysical divergence. Their physics is common to all rocky planets and is accessible to simulations that adopt coupled interior-atmosphere modelling approaches. Our understanding of planet histories and interpretation of current states is dependent on this modelling, yet existing codes vary in their approximations. Here, we present the first results from the Coupled atmospHere Interior modeL Intercomparison (CHILI) project; benchmarking planetary evolution codes in the context of Earth and Venus to identify key model sensitivities. Our 'nominal' Earth models predict magma ocean solidification timescales within 4 Myr of thermal evolution, and are consistent with empirical constraints on Earth's early history. Venus scenarios exhibit more diverse behaviours where prolonged magma ocean stages can be conditionally sustained for 50 Myr. Cooling timescales correlate with initial hydrogen and carbon budgets, but model-specific treatments of volatile partitioning and vertical energy transport introduce substantial inter-model variance. Different parametrisations of mantle geodynamics, convection, melting curves, rheological properties, and radiative transfer give rise to divergent evolutionary behaviours. Discrepancies in atmospheres generated by magma ocean outgassing underscore these differences, although C-H-O compositions with surface pressures exceeding 100 bar are favoured. This intercomparison identifies critical sensitivities in volatile partitioning, escape processes, mantle viscosity, and melting. Validating these treatments is essential for enabling deep insight into the early histories of the Solar System's terrestrial planets, and for drawing meaningful interpretations from ongoing observational exoplanet campaigns.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.24757 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Cooling and solidification of Nominal Earth and Venus cases (solid and dashed lines). Each panel plots melt fraction versus simulated time, calculated by each model (panels). Simulation end points are indicated by circular markers. Time is measured relative to some fully-molten state. Taking t = 0 as Earth’s final global re-melting event, e.g. the Moon-forming impact, vertical black lines corre￾spond to two estimate… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Time taken for Earth scenarios to reach melt fractions of (a) 95%, (b) 40%, and (c) 5%. Cooling timescales are sensitive to planetary inventories of hydro￾gen (y-axes) and carbon (marker opacity), for a given model (marker colour). Connected scatter points span three hydro￾gen inventories, for a given carbon inventory. Time is mea￾sured relative to some fully-molten state. Taking t = 0 as Earth’s final global re-mel… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Atmospheric compositions for Nominal Earth mantle melt fractions of (a) 95% and (b) 5%. For each model (x-axis), gas partial pressures [bar] are shown by stacked bar charts (colours), alongside surface temperature (grey stars). Models do not simulate the same set of gas species; e.g. by neglecting CO2. 0 1 2 3 4 10 20k g (a) Outgassed to atm. Nominal-Earth H,C inventories at = 5% 0 1 2 3 4 10 20k g (b) Dissolved in … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (15 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Hydrogen and carbon mass budgets (green and orange bars) distributed between the three reservoirs of Nom￾inal Earth at 5% mantle melt fraction. Panels show masses of H and C: (a) outgassed into the atmosphere, (b, dotted) dissolved in the remnant magma ocean, (c, hatch…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Atmospheric compositions for Nominal Venus at 5% mantle melt fraction. Analogous to Nominal Earth case in Figure 3b by adopting the same axis limits. sphere is necessary for it to solidify (Hamano et al. 2015; Krissansen-Totton et al. 2021b; Hamano et al. 2025). An exc…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: plots the mantle fO2 calculated by four sim￾ulations of Nominal Venus. In absolute terms, the simu￾lated fO2 decreases over time as temperature decreases (Figure 6a). However, it is more appropriate to compare fO2 in relative terms (Frost 1991). Figure 6b shows four mo…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: plots the hydrogen and carbon inventories of the Nominal Venus scenario, over time, which both de￾crease due to the cumulative effects of atmospheric es￾cape processes. The circular markers show the amount of initial H and C retained by the planet by the time its mantl…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Outgoing longwave radiation flux from Nom￾inal Earth, plotted as a function of melt fraction (a) and surface temperature (b). Dashed black line quantifies ab￾sorbed stellar radiation: ASR = L⊙(50 Myr) 4π(1 AU)2 × (1 − 0.1) × 0.375 cos(48.19◦ ), with 10% Bond albedo, 0.…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: c shows that our models predict only late￾stage increases in viscosity to values above 1 Pa s, at melt fractions < 5%. These differing behaviours are partially geometric: the volume-averaged melt fraction (x-axis) is weighted towards molten upper mantle layers which ha…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Melting curves used by each model (line colour), which are described in Section 2.2. Solidus curves (a) shown by solid lines, and liquidus curves (b) shown by dashed lines. All sets of melting curves are plotted as functions of pressure (left y-spines) and depth (righ…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Snapshots of simulated atmospheric T(p) profiles evolving over time (panels a–e) for Earth maximum-hydrogen inventory cases (three carbon inventories per model). Line colour indicates the model used. Each line opacity indicates the carbon inventory. Dashed blue line s…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Overview for evolution of Nominal Earth (left) and Nominal Venus (right) simulated by GOOEY [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Overview for evolution of Nominal Earth (left) and Nominal Venus (right) simulated by NEONGOOEY. 0 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 Press. 3 [bar] Total H2O CO2 H2 CO CH4 O2 0 25 50 75 Partitioning 100 [%] H C O atm melt solid 2000 3000 Temp. [K] Tsurf Tpot 0 10 100 101 102 103 104 …
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Overview for evolution of Nominal Earth (left) and Nominal Venus (right) simulated by PROTEUS. 0 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 Press. 3 [bar] Total H2O CO2 H2 CO CH4 O2 0 25 50 75 Partitioning 100 [%] H C O atm melt solid 2000 3000 Temp. [K] Tsurf Tpot 0 10 100 101 102 103 104 10…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Overview for evolution of Nominal Earth (left) and Nominal Venus (right) simulated by PACMAN [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Overview for evolution of Nominal Earth (left) and Nominal Venus (right) simulated by LINCS. 0 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 Press. 3 [bar] Total H2O CO2 H2 CO CH4 O2 0 25 50 75 Partitioning 100 [%] H C O atm melt solid 2000 3000 Temp. [K] Tsurf Tpot 0 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 En…
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Overview for evolution of Nominal Earth (left) and Nominal Venus (right) simulated by MOAI. 0 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 Press. 3 [bar] Total H2O CO2 0 25 50 75 Partitioning 100 [%] H C O atm melt solid 2000 3000 Temp. [K] Tsurf Tpot 0 10 100 101 102 103 104 Energy flux 5 [W/m…
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Overview for evolution of Nominal Earth (left) and Nominal Venus (right) simulated by PLANATMO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_18.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Constraining the lives and times of exoplanets through evolutionary Bayesian retrievals

    astro-ph.EP 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Evolutionary Bayesian retrievals using the PROTEUS model can infer initial volatile inventories and interior conditions of exoplanets from synthetic observables, with best success for terrestrial-mass planets.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

247 extracted references · 228 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    APACrefauthors \ 1997

    Abe, Y. 1997, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 100, 27, 10.1016/S0031-9201(96)03229-3

    work page doi:10.1016/s0031-9201(96)03229-3 1997

  2. [2]

    1985, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 90, C545, 10.1029/JB090iS02p0C545

    Abe, Y., & Matsui, T. 1985, Journal of Geophysical Research, 90, C545, 10.1029/jb090is02p0c545

    work page doi:10.1029/jb090is02p0c545 1985

  3. [3]

    Abel and L

    Abel, M., & Frommhold, L. 2013, Canadian Journal of Physics, 91, 857, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjp-2012-0532

    work page doi:10.1139/cjp-2012-0532 2013

  4. [4]

    Refining the Transit-timing and Photometric Analysis of TRAPPIST-1: Masses, Radii, Densities, Dynamics, and Ephemerides

    Agol , E., Dorn , C., Grimm , S. L., et al. 2021, , 2, 1, 10.3847/PSJ/abd022

    work page doi:10.3847/psj/abd022 2021

  5. [5]

    PALEOS: Multiphase equations of state and mass-radius relations for exoplanet interiors

    Attia, M., Lichtenberg, T., Jungov a \' a , E., & Sastre, M. 2026, arXiv, 10.48550/arXiv.2605.03741

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.03741 2026

  6. [6]

    2005, Nature, 436, 1127, doi: 10.1038/nature03882

    Baker, J., Bizzarro, M., Wittig, N., Connelly, J., & Haack, H. 2005, Nature, 436, 1127, 10.1038/nature03882

    work page doi:10.1038/nature03882 2005

  7. [7]

    New evolutionary models for pre-main sequence and main sequence low-mass stars down to the hydrogen-burning limit

    Baraffe, I., Homeier, D., Allard, F., & Chabrier, G. 2015, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 577, A42, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425481

    work page Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425481 2015

  8. [8]

    doi:10.1126/sciadv.1602365

    Barboni, M., Boehnke, P., Keller, B., et al. 2017, Sci. Adv., 3, 10.1126/sciadv.1602365

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.1602365 2017

Show all 247 references
  1. [9]

    2017, Celest

    Barnes, R. 2017, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astr., 129, 509, 10.1007/s10569-017-9783-7

    2017 doi

  2. [10]

    2021, Astrobiology, 21, 1325

    Barth, P., Carone, L., Barnes, R., et al. 2021, Astrobiology, 21, 1325

    2021

  3. [11]

    M., et al

    Baumeister, P., Miozzi, F., Guimond, C. M., et al. 2025, Space Sci. Rev., 221, 123, 10.1007/s11214-025-01248-5

    2025 doi

  4. [12]

    L., Raymond, S

    Bean, J. L., Raymond, S. N., & Owen, J. E. 2021, J. Geophys. Res. Planets, 126, e2020JE006639, 10.1029/2020JE006639

    2021 doi

  5. [13]

    A., Hirschmann, M

    Bergin, E. A., Hirschmann, M. M., & Izidoro, A. 2026, Carbon from Interstellar Clouds to Habitable Worlds , arXiv, 10.48550/arXiv.2602.10308

    2026 doi

  6. [14]

    Bezanson, J., Edelman, A., Karpinski, S., & Shah, V. B. 2017, SIAM R eview, 59, 65, 10.1137/141000671

    2017 doi

  7. [15]

    E., Gaffney, A

    Borg, L. E., Gaffney, A. M., & Shearer, C. K. 2014, Meteorit. Planet. Sci., 50, 715, 10.1111/maps.12373

    2014 doi

  8. [16]

    Bottinga, Y., & Weill, D. F. 1972, American Journal of Science, 272, 438, 10.2475/ajs.272.5.438

    1972 doi

  9. [17]

    M., & Parman, S

    Boukar e \' e , C.-E., Parmentier, E. M., & Parman, S. W. 2018, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 491, 216, 10.1016/j.epsl.2018.03.037

    2018 doi

  10. [18]

    2025, Nature, 640, 114, 10.1038/s41586-025-08701-z

    Boukar e \' e , C.- E \' E ., Badro, J., & Samuel, H. 2025, Nature, 640, 114, 10.1038/s41586-025-08701-z

    2025 doi

  11. [19]

    J., Hakim, K., Sossi, P

    Bower, D. J., Hakim, K., Sossi, P. A., & Sanan, P. 2022, Planet. Sci. J., 3, 93, 10.3847/PSJ/ac5fb1

    2022 doi

  12. [20]

    J., Sanan, P., & Wolf, A

    Bower, D. J., Sanan, P., & Wolf, A. S. 2018, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 274, 49, 10.1016/j.pepi.2017.11.004

    2018 doi

  13. [21]

    J., Thompson , M

    Bower , D. J., Thompson , M. A., Hakim , K., Tian , M., & Sossi , P. A. 2025, , 995, 59, 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1479

    2025 doi

  14. [22]

    Box, G. E. P. 1976, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71, 791, 10.1080/01621459.1976.10480949

    1976 doi

  15. [23]

    A., Bagenal, F., Ma, Y.-J., Nilsson, H., & Wieser, G

    Brain, D. A., Bagenal, F., Ma, Y.-J., Nilsson, H., & Wieser, G. S. 2016, J. Geophys. Res. Planets, 121, 2364, 10.1002/2016JE005162

    2016 doi

  16. [24]

    K., Ghail , R

    Byrne , P. K., Ghail , R. C., S eng \"o r , A. M. C., et al. 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 118, e2025919118, 10.1073/pnas.2025919118

    2021 doi

  17. [25]

    Cameron, A. G. W., & Ward, W. R. 1976, Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, 7, 120. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976LPI.....7..120C/abstract

    1976

  18. [26]

    M., & Asphaug, E

    Canup, R. M., & Asphaug, E. 2001, Nature, 412, 708, 10.1038/35089010

    2001 doi

  19. [27]

    2025, , 693, A303, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450307

    Carone , L., Barnes , R., Noack , L., et al. 2025, , 693, A303, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450307

    2025 doi

  20. [28]

    J., Valley, J

    Cavosie, A. J., Valley, J. W., Wilde, S. A., & F., E. I. M. 2005, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 235, 663, 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.04.028

    2005 doi

  21. [29]

    L., et al

    Chaverot, G. L., et al. In prep., Planet. Sci. J

  22. [30]

    Chen, E. M. A., & Nimmo, F. 2016, Icarus, 275, 132, 10.1016/j.icarus.2016.04.012

    2016 doi

  23. [31]

    J., et al

    Cherubim, C., Wordsworth, R., Bower, D. J., et al. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 983, 97

    2025

  24. [32]

    I., Perets, H

    Citron, R. I., Perets, H. B., & Aharonson, O. 2018, Astrophys. J., 862, 5, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaca2d

    2018 doi

  25. [33]

    Clark , W. C. 1982, Carbon Dioxide Review (New York: Oxford University Press), 469

    1982

  26. [34]

    Cmiel , J., Wordsworth , R., & Seeley , J. T. 2025, , 6, 123, 10.3847/PSJ/adcd5f

    2025 doi

  27. [35]

    2026, Mon

    Constantinou, T., Shorttle, O., & Nicholls, H. 2026, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 548, stag823, 10.1093/mnras/stag823

    2026 doi

  28. [36]

    Constantinou, T., Shorttle, O., & Rimmer, P. B. 2025, Nat. Astron., 9, 189, 10.1038/s41550-024-02414-5

    2025 doi

  29. [37]

    2009, Geochem

    Costa, A., Caricchi, L., & Bagdassarov, N. 2009, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 10, 10.1029/2008GC002138

    2009 doi

  30. [38]

    Cronin, T. W. 2014, J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 2994, 10.1175/JAS-D-13-0392.1

    2014 doi

  31. [39]

    Dalrymple, G. B. 2001, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 190, 205, 10.1144/GSL.SP.2001.190.01.14

    2001 doi

  32. [40]

    2013, Rev

    Dasgupta, R. 2013, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 75, 183, 10.2138/rmg.2013.75.7

    2013 doi

  33. [41]

    2017, Nature, 541, 521, 10.1038/nature20830

    Dauphas, N. 2017, Nature, 541, 521, 10.1038/nature20830

    2017 doi

  34. [42]

    2016, Nature, 532, 207, 10.1038/nature17169

    Demory, B.-O., Gillon, M., de Wit, J., et al. 2016, Nature, 532, 207, 10.1038/nature17169

    2016 doi

  35. [43]

    2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series , Vol

    Dr a \.z kowska, J., Bitsch, B., Lambrechts, M., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series , Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII , ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 717, 10.48550/arXiv.2203.09759

    2023 doi

  36. [44]

    Drilleau, M., Samuel, H., Verhoeven, O., et al. 2026, J. Geophys. Res. Planets, 131, e2025JE009303, 10.1029/2025JE009303

    2026 doi

  37. [45]

    Elkins-Tanton, L. T. 2008, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 271, 181, 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.03.062

    2008 doi

  38. [46]

    2012, Annual review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 40, 113, 10.1146/annurev-earth-042711-105503

    ---. 2012, Annual review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 40, 113, 10.1146/annurev-earth-042711-105503

    2012 doi

  39. [47]

    2022, Astron

    Farhat, M., Auclair-Desrotour, P., Bou e \' e , G., & Laskar, J. 2022, Astron. Astrophys., 665, L1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243445

    2022 doi

  40. [48]

    2025, Astrophys

    Farhat, M., Auclair-Desrotour, P., Bou e \' e , G., Lichtenberg, T., & Laskar, J. 2025, Astrophys. J., 979, 133, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9b93

    2025 doi

  41. [49]

    A., Campbell, A

    Fischer, R. A., Campbell, A. J., Shofner, G. A., et al. 2011, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 304, 496, 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.02.025

    2011 doi

  42. [50]

    Foley, B. J. 2015, Astrophys. J., 812, 36, 10.1088/0004-637X/812/1/36

    2015 doi

  43. [51]

    F., Ahlers, J

    Fromont, E. F., Ahlers, J. P., do Amaral, L. N. R., et al. 2024, Astrophys. J., 961, 115, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0e0e

    2024 doi

  44. [52]

    Frost, B. R. 1991, Chapter 1.INTRODUCTION TO OXYGEN FUGACITY AND ITS PETROLOGIC IMPORTANCE (Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter), 1--10, doi:10.1515/9781501508684-004

    1991 doi

  45. [53]

    J., & McCammon, C

    Frost, D. J., & McCammon, C. A. 2008, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 36, 389, 10.1146/annurev.earth.36.031207.124322

    2008 doi

  46. [54]

    E., Meadows, V

    Garcia, R., Barnes, R., Driscoll, P. E., Meadows, V. S., & Gialluca, M. 2026, Planet. Sci. J., 7, 120, 10.3847/PSJ/ae5248

    2026 doi

  47. [55]

    B., Getty, S

    Garvin, J. B., Getty, S. A., Arney, G. N., et al. 2022, Planet. Sci. J., 3, 117, 10.3847/PSJ/ac63c2

    2022 doi

  48. [56]

    2016, Geochem

    Genda, H. 2016, Geochem. J., 50, 27, 10.2343/geochemj.2.0398

    2016 doi

  49. [57]

    C., Smrekar , S

    Ghail , R. C., Smrekar , S. E., Widemann , T., et al. 2024, , 220, 36, 10.1007/s11214-024-01065-2

    2024 doi

  50. [58]

    S., Hirschmann, M

    Ghiorso, M. S., Hirschmann, M. M., Reiners, P. W., & Kress, V. C. 2002, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 3, 1, 10.1029/2001GC000217

    2002 doi

  51. [59]

    K., Driscoll, P

    Gilbert-Janizek, S., Barnes, R. K., Driscoll, P. E., et al. 2026, arXiv, 10.48550/arXiv.2602.02267

    2026 doi

  52. [60]

    Gillmann, C., & Tackley, P. 2014, J. Geophys. Res. Planets, 119, 1189, 10.1002/2013JE004505

    2014 doi

  53. [61]

    J., Avice, G., et al

    Gillmann, C., Way, M. J., Avice, G., et al. 2022, Space Sci. Rev., 218, 56, 10.1007/s11214-022-00924-0

    2022 doi

  54. [62]

    2017, Space Sci

    Gilmore, M., Treiman, A., Helbert, J., & Smrekar, S. 2017, Space Sci. Rev., 212, 1511, 10.1007/s11214-017-0370-8

    2017 doi

  55. [63]

    Grinspoon, D. H. 1993, Nature, 363, 428, 10.1038/363428a0

    1993 doi

  56. [64]

    A., Myers, D., & Emery, K

    Gueymard, C. A., Myers, D., & Emery, K. 2002, Sol. Energy, 73, 443, 10.1016/S0038-092X(03)00005-7

    2002 doi

  57. [65]

    G \"u lcher , A. J. P., Gerya , T. V., Mont \'e si , L. G. J., & Munch , J. 2020, Nature Geoscience, 13, 547, 10.1038/s41561-020-0606-110.31223/x5jk88

    2020 doi

  58. [66]

    N., & Canup, R

    Halliday, A. N., & Canup, R. M. 2023, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 4, 19, 10.1038/s43017-022-00370-0

    2023 doi

  59. [67]

    2013, Nature, 497, 607, 10.1038/nature12163

    Hamano, K., Abe, Y., & Genda, H. 2013, Nature, 497, 607, 10.1038/nature12163

    2013 doi

  60. [68]

    J., Lourenco, D., & Westall, F

    Hamano, K., Gillmann, C., Golabek, G. J., Lourenco, D., & Westall, F. 2025, in Treatise on Geochemistry (Third edition), third edition edn., ed. A. Anbar & D. Weis (Oxford: Elsevier), 541--574, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99762-1.00104-2

    2025 doi

  61. [69]

    Hamano , K., Kawahara , H., Abe , Y., Onishi , M., & Hashimoto , G. L. 2015, , 806, 216, 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/216

    2015 doi

  62. [70]

    M., Lichtenberg, T., et al

    Hammond, M., Guimond, C. M., Lichtenberg, T., et al. 2025, Astrophys. J. Lett., 978, L40, 10.3847/2041-8213/ada0bc

    2025 doi

  63. [71]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    2020 doi

  64. [72]

    Hay, H. C. F. C., & Matsuyama, I. 2019, Astrophys. J., 875, 22, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0c21

    2019 doi

  65. [73]

    2019, Annu

    Helling, C. 2019, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 47, 583, 10.1146/annurev-earth-053018-060401

    2019 doi

  66. [74]

    Herath , M., Boukar \'e , C.- \'E ., & Cowan , N. B. 2024, , 535, 2404, 10.1093/mnras/stae2431

    2024 doi

  67. [75]

    Hier-Majumder, S., & Hirschmann, M. M. 2017, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 18, 3078, 10.1002/2017GC006937

    2017 doi

  68. [76]

    2013, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 41, 657, 10.1146/annurev-earth-050212-124007

    Hirose, K., Labrosse, S., & Hernlund, J. 2013, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 41, 657, 10.1146/annurev-earth-050212-124007

    2013 doi

  69. [77]

    2022, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 328, 221

    Hirschmann, M. 2022, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 328, 221

    2022

  70. [78]

    Hirschmann, M. M. 2000, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 1, 10.1029/2000GC000070

    2000 doi

  71. [79]

    2012, Earth Planet

    ---. 2012, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 341-344, 48, 10.1016/j.epsl.2012.06.015

    2012 doi

  72. [80]

    2025, arXiv, 10.48550/arXiv.2511.01231

    Huang, D., & Dorn, C. 2025, arXiv, 10.48550/arXiv.2511.01231

    2025 doi

  73. [81]

    L., Perkins, R

    Huber, M. L., Perkins, R. A., Laesecke, A., et al. 2009, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 38, 101, 10.1063/1.3088050

    2009 doi

  74. [82]

    M., Pepin, R

    Hunten, D. M., Pepin, R. O., & Walker, J. C. G. 1987, Icarus, 69, 532, 10.1016/0019-1035(87)90022-4

    1987 doi

  75. [83]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    2007 doi

  76. [84]

    2006, Astrophys

    Ikoma, M., & Genda, H. 2006, Astrophys. J., 648, 696, 10.1086/505780

    2006 doi

  77. [85]

    Ingersoll, A. P. 1969, J. Atmos. Sci., 26, 1191, 10.1175/1520-0469(1969)026<1191:TRGAHO>2.0.CO;2

    1969 doi

  78. [86]

    1998, Viscosity of water , Standard, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH

    ISO/TR\,3666 . 1998, Viscosity of water , Standard, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH

    1998

  79. [87]

    A., & Head, J

    Ivanov, M. A., & Head, J. W. 2013, Planet. Space Sci., 84, 66, 10.1016/j.pss.2013.04.018

    2013 doi

  80. [88]

    J., Miguel, Y., Min, M., et al

    Janssen, L. J., Miguel, Y., Min, M., et al. 2026, arXiv, 10.48550/arXiv.2601.15927

    2026 doi

  81. [89]

    Javoy, M. 2005, C. R. Geosci., 337, 139, 10.1016/j.crte.2004.10.005

    2005 doi

  82. [90]

    P., Bartel, M., & G \"u del, M

    Johnstone, C. P., Bartel, M., & G \"u del, M. 2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 649, A96

    2021

  83. [91]

    2023, Galaxies, 11, 75, 10.3390/galaxies11030075

    Joyce, M., & Tayar, J. 2023, Galaxies, 11, 75, 10.3390/galaxies11030075

    2023 doi

  84. [92]

    F., Eggler, D

    Kasting, J. F., Eggler, D. H., & Raeburn, S. P. 1993, J. Geol., 10.1086/648219

    1993 doi

  85. [93]

    Katsura, T. 2022, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 127, e2021JB023562, 10.1029/2021JB023562

    2022 doi

  86. [94]

    L., et al

    Katyal, N., Ortenzi, G., Grenfell, J. L., et al. 2020, Astron. Astrophys., 643, A81, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038779

    2020 doi

  87. [95]

    F., Spiegelman, M., & Langmuir, C

    Katz, R. F., Spiegelman, M., & Langmuir, C. H. 2003, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 4, 10.1029/2002GC000433

    2003 doi

  88. [96]

    Kaula, W. M. 1999, Icarus, 139, 32, 10.1006/icar.1999.6082

    1999 doi

  89. [97]

    A., Eke, V

    Kegerreis, J. A., Eke, V. R., Catling, D. C., et al. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 901, L31, 10.3847/2041-8213/abb5fb

    2020 doi

  90. [98]

    Kent, A. J. R. 2008, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 69, 273, 10.2138/rmg.2008.69.8

    2008 doi

  91. [99]

    2012, Astronomy and Astrophysics Library

    Kippenhahn, R., Weigert, A., & Weiss, A. 2012, Astronomy and Astrophysics Library

    2012

  92. [100]

    Kitzmann, D., Patzer, A. B. C., von Paris, P., et al. 2010, Astron. Astrophys., 511, A66, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913491

    2010 doi

  93. [101]

    W., & Patzer, A

    Kitzmann, D., Stock, J. W., & Patzer, A. B. C. 2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 527, 7263

    2024

  94. [102]

    2013, Annu

    Korenaga, J. 2013, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 41, 117, 10.1146/annurev-earth-050212-124208

    2013 doi

  95. [103]

    2025, Icarus, 442, 116759, 10.1016/j.icarus.2025.116759

    ---. 2025, Icarus, 442, 116759, 10.1016/j.icarus.2025.116759

    2025 doi

  96. [104]

    C., & Carmichael, I

    Kress, V. C., & Carmichael, I. S. E. 1991, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 108, 82, 10.1007/BF00307328

    1991 doi

  97. [105]

    2022, Chemical Habitability : Supply and Retention of Life 's Essential Elements During Planet Formation , arXiv, 10.48550/arXiv.2203.10056

    Krijt, S., Kama, M., McClure, M., et al. 2022, Chemical Habitability : Supply and Retention of Life 's Essential Elements During Planet Formation , arXiv, 10.48550/arXiv.2203.10056

    2022 doi

  98. [106]

    Krissansen-Totton, J., & Fortney, J. J. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 933, 115

    2022

  99. [107]

    J., & Nimmo, F

    Krissansen-Totton, J., Fortney, J. J., & Nimmo, F. 2021b, The Planetary Science Journal, 2, 216

  100. [108]

    J., Nimmo , F., & Wogan , N

    Krissansen-Totton , J., Fortney , J. J., Nimmo , F., & Wogan , N. 2021a, AGU Advances, 2, e00294, 10.1029/2020AV000294

    doi

  101. [109]

    L., & Fortney, J

    Krissansen-Totton, J., Thompson, M., Galloway, M. L., & Fortney, J. J. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 189

    2022

  102. [110]

    Krissansen-Totton, J., Wogan, N., Thompson, M., & Fortney, J. J. 2024, Nature Communications, 15, 8374, 10.1038/s41467-024-52642-6

    2024 doi

  103. [111]

    W., & Hirose, K

    Labrosse, S., Hernlund, J. W., & Hirose, K. 2015, in The Early Earth (Chichester, England, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.), 123--142, 10.1002/9781118860359.ch7

    2015 doi

  104. [112]

    1997, Phys

    Labrosse, S., Poirier, J.-P., & Le Mou e \" e l, J.-L. 1997, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 99, 1, 10.1016/S0031-9201(96)03207-4

    1997 doi

  105. [113]

    2020, Space Sci

    Lammer, H., Brasser, R., Johansen, A., Scherf, M., & Leitzinger, M. 2020, Space Sci. Rev., 217, 7, 10.1007/s11214-020-00778-4

    2020 doi

  106. [114]

    H., Boukar e \' e , C.- E \' E ., Badro, J., & Samuel, H

    Lark, L. H., Boukar e \' e , C.- E \' E ., Badro, J., & Samuel, H. 2026, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 680, 119880, 10.1016/j.epsl.2026.119880

    2026 doi

  107. [115]

    2020, Nat

    Laurent, O., Bj o \" o rnsen, J., Wotzlaw, J.-F., et al. 2020, Nat. Geosci., 13, 163, 10.1038/s41561-019-0520-6

    2020 doi

  108. [116]

    Lay, T., Hernlund, J., & Buffett, B. A. 2008, Nat. Geosci., 1, 25, 10.1038/ngeo.2007.44

    2008 doi

  109. [117]

    Lebrun, T., Massol, H., Chassefi\`ere, E., et al. 2013, J. Geophys. Res. Planets, 118, 1155, 10.1002/jgre.20068

    2013 doi

  110. [118]

    2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 645, A20, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039040

    Leconte, J. 2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 645, A20, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039040

    2021 doi

  111. [119]

    2021, Astrophys

    Lichtenberg, T. 2021, Astrophys. J. Lett., 914, L4, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac0146

    2021 doi

  112. [120]

    J., Hammond , M., et al

    Lichtenberg , T., Bower , D. J., Hammond , M., et al. 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 126, e06711, 10.1029/2020JE006711

    2021 doi

  113. [121]

    J., Burn, R., et al

    Lichtenberg, T., Golabek, G. J., Burn, R., et al. 2019, Nat. Astron., 3, 307, 10.1038/s41550-018-0688-5

    2019 doi

  114. [122]

    2025, Treatise on Geochemistry, 7, 51, 10.1016/B978-0-323-99762-1.00122-4

    Lichtenberg , T., & Miguel , Y. 2025, Treatise on Geochemistry, 7, 51, 10.1016/B978-0-323-99762-1.00122-4

    2025 doi

  115. [123]

    2026, Planet

    Lichtenberg, T., Schaefer, L., Krissansen-Totton, J., et al. 2026, Planet. Sci. J., 7, 108, 10.3847/PSJ/ae593b

    2026 doi

  116. [124]

    K., Nakajima , M., & Fischer , R

    Lichtenberg , T., Schaefer , L. K., Nakajima , M., & Fischer , R. A. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka , Y. Aikawa , T. Muto , K. Tomida , & M. Tamura , 907, 10.48550/arXiv.2203.10023

    2023 doi

  117. [125]

    Lichtenberg , T., Shorttle , O., Teske , J., & Kempton , E. M. R. 2025, Science, 390, eads3660, 10.1126/science.ads3360

    2025 doi

  118. [126]

    J., & Stewart, S

    Lock, S. J., & Stewart, S. T. 2024, The Planetary Science Journal, 5, 28, 10.3847/PSJ/ad0b16

    2024 doi

  119. [127]

    1998, The Planetary Scientist ' s Companion (Oxford, England, UK: Oxford University Press), 10.1093/oso/9780195116946.001.0001

    Lodders, K., & Fegley, B. 1998, The Planetary Scientist ' s Companion (Oxford, England, UK: Oxford University Press), 10.1093/oso/9780195116946.001.0001

    1998 doi

  120. [128]

    G., Moran, S

    Lodge, M. G., Moran, S. E., Wakeford, H. R., Leinhardt, Z. M., & Marley, M. S. 2026, Astrophys. J., 997, 317, 10.3847/1538-4357/ae2752

    2026 doi

  121. [129]

    2015, Astrobiology, 15, 119

    Luger, R., & Barnes, R. 2015, Astrobiology, 15, 119

    2015

  122. [130]

    E., Zahnle , K., Marley , M

    Lupu , R. E., Zahnle , K., Marley , M. S., et al. 2014, , 784, 27, 10.1088/0004-637X/784/1/27

    2014 doi

  123. [131]

    M. S. Marley , & A. S. Ackerman . 2014, in Comparative Climatology of Terrestrial Planets (Tucson, AZ, USA: University of Arizona Press), 367--392. https://muse.jhu.edu/chapter/1207495

    2014

  124. [132]

    2024, AIP Conf

    Manners, J. 2024, AIP Conf. Proc., 2988, 10.1063/5.0185476

    2024 doi

  125. [133]

    2023, Nat

    Marchi, S., Rufu, R., & Korenaga, J. 2023, Nat. Astron., 7, 1180, 10.1038/s41550-023-02037-2

    2023 doi

  126. [134]

    2017, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 122, 1539, 10.1002/2016JE005224

    Marcq, E., Salvador, A., Massol, H., & Davaille, A. 2017, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 122, 1539, 10.1002/2016JE005224

    2017 doi

  127. [135]

    2025, in Treatise on Geochemistry (Third edition), third edition edn., ed

    Marty, B., & Genda, H. 2025, in Treatise on Geochemistry (Third edition), third edition edn., ed. A. Anbar & D. Weis (Oxford: Elsevier), 383--416, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99762-1.00106-6

    2025 doi

  128. [136]

    2023, Planet

    Maurice, M., Dasgupta, R., & Hassanzadeh, P. 2023, Planet. Sci. J., 4, 31, 10.3847/PSJ/acb2ca

    2023 doi

  129. [137]

    Maurice, M., Tosi, N., Samuel, H., et al. 2017, J. Geophys. Res. Planets, 122, 577, 10.1002/2016JE005250

    2017 doi

  130. [138]

    F., & Sun , S

    McDonough , W. F., & Sun , S. s. 1995, Chemical Geology, 120, 223, 10.1016/0009-2541(94)00140-4

    1995 doi

  131. [139]

    McKenzie, D. P. 1967, Geophys. J. Int., 14, 297, 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1967.tb06246.x

    1967 doi

  132. [140]

    G., Guimond, C

    Meier, T. G., Guimond, C. M., Pierrehumbert, R. T., et al. 2026, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 547, 10.1093/mnras/stag390

    2026 doi

  133. [141]

    2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 124, 3382

    Miyazaki, Y., & Korenaga, J. 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 124, 3382

    2019

  134. [142]

    J., Harrison , T

    Mojzsis , S. J., Harrison , T. M., & Pidgeon , R. T. 2001, , 409, 178, 10.1038/35051557

    2001 doi

  135. [143]

    P., van Boekel , R., et al

    Molli \`e re , P., Wardenier , J. P., van Boekel , R., et al. 2019, , 627, A67, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935470

    2019 doi

  136. [144]

    L., Asimow, P

    Mosenfelder, J. L., Asimow, P. D., Frost, D. J., Rubie, D. C., & Ahrens, T. J. 2009, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 114, 10.1029/2008JB005900

    2009 doi

  137. [145]

    J., W u \" u nnemann, K., et al

    Nakajima, M., Golabek, G. J., W u \" u nnemann, K., et al. 2021, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 568, 116983, 10.1016/j.epsl.2021.116983

    2021 doi

  138. [146]

    Nakajima, M., & Stevenson, D. J. 2015, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 427, 286, 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.06.023

    2015 doi

  139. [147]

    Nakajima, S., Hayashi, Y.-Y., & Abe, Y. 1992, J. Atmos. Sci., 49, 2256, 10.1175/1520-0469(1992)049<2256:ASOTGE>2.0.CO;2

    1992 doi

  140. [148]

    G., Cowan, N

    Nguyen, T. G., Cowan, N. B., & Dang, L. 2024, The Astronomical Journal, 168, 287

    2024

  141. [149]

    2026 a , CHILI (CUISINES) Part I - Evolution of Earth and Venus, simulation data and plotting utilities, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.20680020

    Nicholls, H. 2026 a , CHILI (CUISINES) Part I - Evolution of Earth and Venus, simulation data and plotting utilities, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.20680020

    2026 doi

  142. [150]

    2026 b , PhD thesis, University of Oxford, 10.5287/ora-bmz5xpbrk

    ---. 2026 b , PhD thesis, University of Oxford, 10.5287/ora-bmz5xpbrk

    2026 doi

  143. [151]

    M., Hay, H

    Nicholls, H., Guimond, C. M., Hay, H. C. F. C., et al. 2025 a , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 541, 2566, 10.1093/mnras/staf1167

    2025 doi

  144. [152]

    2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 523, 5681, 10.1093/mnras/stad1734

    Nicholls, H., Hébrard, E., Venot, O., Drummond, B., & Evans, E. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 523, 5681, 10.1093/mnras/stad1734

    2023 doi

  145. [153]

    J., & Pierrehumbert, R

    Nicholls, H., Lichtenberg, T., Bower, D. J., & Pierrehumbert, R. 2024, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 129, e2024JE008576, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JE008576

    2024 doi

  146. [154]

    D., et al

    Nicholls, H., Lichtenberg, T., Chatterjee, R. D., et al. 2026 a , Nat. Astron., 1, 10.1038/s41550-026-02815-8

    2026 doi

  147. [155]

    2025 b , Journal of Open Source Software, 10, 7726, 10.21105/joss.07726

    Nicholls, H., Pierrehumbert, R., & Lichtenberg, T. 2025 b , Journal of Open Source Software, 10, 7726, 10.21105/joss.07726

    2025 doi

  148. [156]

    T., Lichtenberg, T., Soucasse, L., & Smeets, S

    Nicholls, H., Pierrehumbert, R. T., Lichtenberg, T., Soucasse, L., & Smeets, S. 2025 c , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 536, 2957, 10.1093/mnras/stae2772

    2025 doi

  149. [157]

    2026 b , arXiv, 10.48550/arXiv.2604.15891

    Nicholls, H., Shorttle, O., Lichtenberg, T., & Pascal, F. 2026 b , arXiv, 10.48550/arXiv.2604.15891

    2026 doi arXiv

  150. [158]

    2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 875, 24, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab08ed

    Nikolaou, A., Katyal, N., Tosi, N., et al. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 875, 24, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab08ed

    2019 doi

  151. [159]

    2024, Nature, 636, 598, 10.1038/s41586-024-08231-0

    Nimmo, F., Kleine, T., & Morbidelli, A. 2024, Nature, 636, 598, 10.1038/s41586-024-08231-0

    2024 doi

  152. [160]

    V., et al

    Odert , P., Lammer , H., Erkaev , N. V., et al. 2018, , 307, 327, 10.1016/j.icarus.2017.10.031

    2018 doi

  153. [161]

    M., & Lenardic, A

    O'Neill, C., Jellinek, A. M., & Lenardic, A. 2007, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 261, 20, 10.1016/j.epsl.2007.05.038

    2007 doi

  154. [162]

    O'Neill, H. St . C., & Eggins, S. M. 2002, Chem. Geol., 186, 151, 10.1016/S0009-2541(01)00414-4

    2002 doi

  155. [163]

    W., Vazan, A., & Brouwers, M

    Ormel, C. W., Vazan, A., & Brouwers, M. G. 2021, Astron. Astrophys., 647, A175, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039706

    2021 doi

  156. [164]

    G., & Korenaga, J

    O ' Rourke, J. G., & Korenaga, J. 2015, Icarus, 260, 128, 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.07.009

    2015 doi

  157. [165]

    Owen, J. E. 2019, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 47, 67, 10.1146/annurev-earth-053018-060246

    2019 doi

  158. [166]

    R., Wu, P., & Yuen, D

    Peltier, W. R., Wu, P., & Yuen, D. A. 1981, in Anelasticity in the Earth (Chichester, England, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.), 59--77, 10.1029/GD004p0059

    1981 doi

  159. [167]

    2024, , 976, 202, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6f03

    Peng , B., & Valencia , D. 2024, , 976, 202, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6f03

    2024 doi

  160. [168]

    o nb a \

    Peslier, A. H., Sch o \" o nb a \" a chler, M., Busemann, H., & Karato, S.-I. 2017, Space Sci. Rev., 212, 743, 10.1007/s11214-017-0387-z

    2017 doi

  161. [169]

    2003, Annu

    Petford, N. 2003, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 31, 399, 10.1146/annurev.earth.31.100901.141352

    2003 doi

  162. [170]

    Pierrehumbert, R. T. 2002, Nature, 419, 191, 10.1038/nature01088

    2002 doi

  163. [171]

    2010, Principles of Planetary Climate (Cambridge, England, UK: Cambridge University Press), 10.1017/CBO9780511780783

    ---. 2010, Principles of Planetary Climate (Cambridge, England, UK: Cambridge University Press), 10.1017/CBO9780511780783

    2010 doi

  164. [172]

    Piette, A. A. A., Gao, P., Brugman, K., et al. 2023, Astrophys. J., 954, 29, 10.3847/1538-4357/acdef2

    2023 doi

  165. [173]

    2019, Icarus, 317, 583, 10.1016/j.icarus.2018.08.023

    Pluriel, W., Marcq, E., & Turbet, M. 2019, Icarus, 317, 583, 10.1016/j.icarus.2018.08.023

    2019 doi

  166. [174]

    Pollack, J. B. 1971, Icarus, 14, 295, 10.1016/0019-1035(71)90001-7

    1971 doi

  167. [175]

    2019, Mon

    Pu, B., & Lai, D. 2019, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 488, 3568, 10.1093/mnras/stz1817

    2019 doi

  168. [176]

    M., Kopparapu, R., Zugger, M

    Ramirez, R. M., Kopparapu, R., Zugger, M. E., et al. 2014, Nat. Geosci., 7, 59, 10.1038/ngeo2000

    2014 doi

  169. [177]

    J., Lock, S

    Roche, M. J., Lock, S. J., Dou, J., et al. 2025, Planet. Sci. J., 6, 149, 10.3847/PSJ/add929

    2025 doi

  170. [178]

    G., Young, E

    Rogers, J. G., Young, E. D., & Schlichting, H. E. 2025, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 544, 3496, 10.1093/mnras/staf1940

    2025 doi

  171. [179]

    2022, , 218, 70, 10.1007/s11214-022-00937-9

    Rolf , T., Weller , M., G \"u lcher , A., et al. 2022, , 218, 70, 10.1007/s11214-022-00937-9

    2022 doi

  172. [180]

    2017, Lithos, 282-283, 316, 10.1016/j.lithos.2017.03.020

    Rollinson, H., Adetunji, J., Lenaz, D., & Szilas, K. 2017, Lithos, 282-283, 316, 10.1016/j.lithos.2017.03.020

    2017 doi

  173. [181]

    2021, Remote Sens., 13, 1624, 10.3390/rs13091624

    Rosenblatt, P., Dumoulin, C., Marty, J.-C., & Genova, A. 2021, Remote Sens., 13, 1624, 10.3390/rs13091624

    2021 doi

  174. [182]

    2010, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 111, 2139, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2010.05.001

    Rothman, L., Gordon, I., Barber, R., et al. 2010, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 111, 2139, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2010.05.001

    2010 doi

  175. [183]

    C., Dale, K

    Rubie, D. C., Dale, K. I., Nathan, G., et al. 2025, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 651, 119139, 10.1016/j.epsl.2024.119139

    2025 doi

  176. [184]

    2022, Nature, 606, 713, 10.1038/s41586-022-04710-4

    Rzeplinski, I., Sanloup, C., Gilabert, E., & Horlait, D. 2022, Nature, 606, 713, 10.1038/s41586-022-04710-4

    2022 doi

  177. [185]

    2016, Global Dynamics of the Earth: Applications of Viscoelastic Relaxation Theory to Solid-Earth and Planetary Geophysics (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands)

    Sabadini, R., Vermeersen, B., & Cambiotti, G. 2016, Global Dynamics of the Earth: Applications of Viscoelastic Relaxation Theory to Solid-Earth and Planetary Geophysics (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands). https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-94-017-7552-6

    2016 doi

  178. [186]

    Salvador, A., Massol, H., Davaille, A., et al. 2017, J. Geophys. Res. Planets, 122, 1458, 10.1002/2017JE005286

    2017 doi

  179. [187]

    Schaefer , L., & Elkins-Tanton , L. T. 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 376, 20180109, 10.1098/rsta.2018.0109

    2018 doi

  180. [188]

    2017, , 843, 120, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa784f

    Schaefer , L., & Fegley , Jr., B. 2017, , 843, 120, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa784f

    2017 doi

  181. [189]

    Schaefer , L., Pahlevan , K., & Elkins-Tanton , L. T. 2024, Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 129, e2023JE008262, 10.1029/2023JE008262

    2024 doi

  182. [190]

    D., Berta-Thompson , Z., & Sasselov , D

    Schaefer , L., Wordsworth , R. D., Berta-Thompson , Z., & Sasselov , D. 2016, , 829, 63, 10.3847/0004-637X/829/2/63

    2016 doi

  183. [191]

    2003, Earth-Sci

    Schiano, P. 2003, Earth-Sci. Rev., 63, 121, 10.1016/S0012-8252(03)00034-5

    2003 doi

  184. [192]

    S., Collerson, K

    Schoenberg, R., Kamber, B. S., Collerson, K. D., & Eugster, O. 2002, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 66, 3151, 10.1016/S0016-7037(02)00911-0

    2002 doi

  185. [193]

    Schulik, M., & Booth, R. A. 2023, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 523, 286, 10.1093/mnras/stad1251

    2023 doi

  186. [194]

    Scott, T., & Kohlstedt, D. L. 2006, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 246, 177, 10.1016/j.epsl.2006.04.027

    2006 doi

  187. [195]

    L., Sossi, P

    Seidler, F. L., Sossi, P. A., & Grimm, S. L. 2024, Astron. Astrophys., 691, A159, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450546

    2024 doi

  188. [196]

    2023, Nature, 620, 287, 10.1038/s41586-023-06258-3

    Selsis, F., Leconte, J., Turbet, M., Chaverot, G., & Bolmont, E. 2023, Nature, 620, 287, 10.1038/s41586-023-06258-3

    2023 doi

  189. [197]

    D., Hirose, K., & Yokoo, S

    Shahar, A., Young, E. D., Hirose, K., & Yokoo, S. 2026, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 10.1146/annurev-earth-040722-094945

    2026 doi

  190. [198]

    Shorttle, O., Jordan, S., Nicholls, H., Lichtenberg, T., & Bower, D. J. 2024, Astrophys. J. Lett., 962, L8, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad206e

    2024 doi

  191. [199]

    J., Hirschmann , M

    Sim , S. J., Hirschmann , M. M., & Hier-Majumder , S. 2024, Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 129, e2024JE008346, 10.1029/2024JE008346

    2024 doi

  192. [200]

    E., Fauchez, T

    Sohl, L. E., Fauchez, T. J., Domagal-Goldman , S., et al. 2024, The Planetary Science Journal, 5, 175, 10.3847/PSJ/ad5830

    2024 doi

  193. [201]

    2025, Science, 388, 1431, 10.1126/science.ads8461

    Sole, C., O ' Neil, J., Rizo, H., et al. 2025, Science, 388, 1431, 10.1126/science.ads8461

    2025 doi

  194. [202]

    2015, in Treatise on Geophysics (Second Edition), second edition edn., ed

    Solomatov, V. 2015, in Treatise on Geophysics (Second Edition), second edition edn., ed. G. Schubert (Oxford: Elsevier), 81--104, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53802-4.00155-X

    2015 doi

  195. [203]

    S., & Moresi, L.-N

    Solomatov, V. S., & Moresi, L.-N. 1996, J. Geophys. Res. Planets, 101, 4737, 10.1029/95JE03361

    1996 doi

  196. [204]

    S., & Stevenson, D

    Solomatov, V. S., & Stevenson, D. J. 1993, J. Geophys. Res. Planets, 98, 5391, 10.1029/92JE02579

    1993 doi

  197. [205]

    J., et al

    Sorbadere, F., Laurenz, V., Frost, D. J., et al. 2018, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 239, 235, 10.1016/j.gca.2018.07.019

    2018 doi

  198. [206]

    A., Burnham, A

    Sossi, P. A., Burnham, A. D., Badro, J., et al. 2020, Sci. Adv., 6, 10.1126/sciadv.abd1387

    2020 doi

  199. [207]

    A., Hin, R

    Sossi, P. A., Hin, R. C., Kleine, T., Morbidelli, A., & Nimmo, F. 2025, Space Sci. Rev., 221, 118, 10.1007/s11214-025-01243-w

    2025 doi

  200. [208]

    A., Tollan, P

    Sossi, P. A., Tollan, P. M. E., Badro, J., & Bower, D. J. 2023, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 601, 117894, 10.1016/j.epsl.2022.117894

    2023 doi

  201. [209]

    J., Ballmer, M

    Spaargaren, R. J., Ballmer, M. D., Bower, D. J., Dorn, C., & Tackley, P. J. 2020, Astron. Astrophys., 643, A44, 10.1051/0004-6361/202037632

    2020 doi

  202. [210]

    2017, Radiative Transfer in the Atmosphere and Ocean (Cambridge University Press)

    Stamnes, K., Thomas, G., & Stamnes, J. 2017, Radiative Transfer in the Atmosphere and Ocean (Cambridge University Press). https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=GN0qDwAAQBAJ

    2017

  203. [211]

    Stevenson, D. J. 2001, Nature, 412, 214, 10.1038/35084155

    2001 doi

  204. [212]

    2014, Philos

    Stixrude, L. 2014, Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. A, 372, 10.1098/rsta.2013.0076

    2014 doi

  205. [213]

    Stixrude, L., de Koker, N., Sun, N., Mookherjee, M., & Karki, B. B. 2009, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 278, 226, 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.12.006

    2009 doi

  206. [214]

    G., Schaber, G

    Strom, R. G., Schaber, G. G., & Dawson, D. D. 1994, J. Geophys. Res. Planets, 99, 10899, 10.1029/94JE00388

    1994 doi

  207. [215]

    S., Dalou , C., & Lichtenberg , T

    Suer , T.-A., Jackson , C., Grewal , D. S., Dalou , C., & Lichtenberg , T. 2023, Frontiers in Earth Science, 11, 1159412, 10.3389/feart.2023.1159412

    2023 doi

  208. [216]

    Tackley, P. J. 2000, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 1, 10.1029/2000GC000036

    2000 doi

  209. [217]

    K., Wallack , N

    Teske , J. K., Wallack , N. L., Piette , A. A. A., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.17231, 10.48550/arXiv.2509.17231

    2025 doi

  210. [218]

    Thompson, M. A. 2026, Astrophys. Space Sci., 371, 33, 10.1007/s10509-026-04564-6

    2026 doi

  211. [219]

    V., Ignatiev, N

    Titov, D. V., Ignatiev, N. I., McGouldrick, K., Wilquet, V., & Wilson, C. F. 2018, Space Sci. Rev., 214, 126, 10.1007/s11214-018-0552-z

    2018 doi

  212. [220]

    2021, Astrophys

    Tsai, S.-M., Innes, H., Lichtenberg, T., et al. 2021, Astrophys. J. Lett., 922, L27, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac399a

    2021 doi

  213. [221]

    M., & Mukhopadhyay, S

    Tucker, J. M., & Mukhopadhyay, S. 2014, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 393, 254, 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.02.050

    2014 doi

  214. [222]

    2021, Nature, 598, 276, 10.1038/s41586-021-03873-w

    Turbet, M., Chaverot, G., Leconte, J., et al. 2021, Nature, 598, 276, 10.1038/s41586-021-03873-w

    2021 doi

  215. [223]

    L., & Schubert, G

    Turcotte, D. L., & Schubert, G. 2002, Geodynamics (Cambridge university press)

    2002

  216. [224]

    S., & Campbell, I

    Turner, J. S., & Campbell, I. H. 1986, Earth-Sci. Rev., 23, 255, 10.1016/0012-8252(86)90015-2

    1986 doi

  217. [225]

    T., Desch, S

    Unterborn, C. T., Desch, S. J., Hinkel, N. R., & Lorenzo, A. 2018, Nat. Astron., 2, 297, 10.1038/s41550-018-0411-6

    2018 doi

  218. [226]

    J., & Sasselov , D

    Valencia , D., O'Connell , R. J., & Sasselov , D. 2006, , 181, 545, 10.1016/j.icarus.2005.11.021

    2006 doi

  219. [227]

    R., Nicholls, H., & Lichtenberg, T

    van Dijk, M. R., Nicholls, H., & Lichtenberg, T. 2026, Planet. Sci. J., 7, 94, 10.3847/PSJ/ae5928

    2026 doi

  220. [228]

    L., Fauchez, T

    Villanueva, G. L., Fauchez, T. J., Kofman, V., et al. 2024, Planet. Sci. J., 5, 64, 10.3847/PSJ/ad2681

    2024 doi

  221. [229]

    Wade, J., & Wood, B. J. 2005, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 236, 78, 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.05.017

    2005 doi

  222. [230]

    Wagner, W., & Pru , A. 2002, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 31, 387, 10.1063/1.1461829

    2002 doi

  223. [231]

    2025, Icarus, 434, 116513, 10.1016/j.icarus.2025.116513

    Walbecq, A., Samuel, H., & Limare, A. 2025, Icarus, 434, 116513, 10.1016/j.icarus.2025.116513

    2025 doi

  224. [232]

    S., Lineweaver, C

    Wang, H. S., Lineweaver, C. H., & Ireland, T. R. 2018, Icarus, 299, 460, 10.1016/j.icarus.2017.08.024

    2018 doi

  225. [233]

    O., & Kite, E

    Warren, A. O., & Kite, E. S. 2023, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 120, e2209751120, 10.1073/pnas.2209751120

    2023 doi

  226. [234]

    J., Del Genio, A

    Way, M. J., Del Genio, A. D., Kiang, N. Y., et al. 2016, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 8376, 10.1002/2016GL069790

    2016 doi

  227. [235]

    2000, Geochim

    Whittington, A., Richet, P., & Holtz, F. 2000, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 64, 3725, 10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00448-8

    2000 doi

  228. [236]

    S., & Bower, D

    Wolf, A. S., & Bower, D. J. 2018, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 278, 59, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2018.02.004

    2018 doi

  229. [237]

    2013, Science, 339, 64, 10.1126/science.1225759

    Wordsworth, R., & Pierrehumbert, R. 2013, Science, 339, 64, 10.1126/science.1225759

    2013 doi

  230. [238]

    2014, Astrophys

    ---. 2014, Astrophys. J. Lett., 785, L20, 10.1088/2041-8205/785/2/L20

    2014 doi

  231. [239]

    2018, The Astronomical Journal, 155, 195

    Wordsworth, R., Schaefer, L., & Fischer, R. 2018, The Astronomical Journal, 155, 195

    2018

  232. [240]

    D., Werlen , A., Marcum , S

    Young , E. D., Werlen , A., Marcum , S. P., Stixrude , L., & Dullemond , C. P. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.00947, 10.48550/arXiv.2507.00947

    2025 doi

  233. [241]

    I., Fortney, J

    Yu, X., Moses, J. I., Fortney, J. J., & Zhang, X. 2021, Astrophys. J., 914, 38, 10.3847/1538-4357/abfdc7

    2021 doi

  234. [242]

    F., & Pollack , J

    Zahnle , K., Kasting , J. F., & Pollack , J. B. 1990, , 84, 502, 10.1016/0019-1035(90)90050-J

    1990 doi

  235. [243]

    2010, Cold Spring Harbor Perspect

    Zahnle, K., Schaefer, L., & Fegley, B. 2010, Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol., 2, a004895, 10.1101/cshperspect.a004895

    2010 doi

  236. [244]

    J., & Kasting, J

    Zahnle, K. J., & Kasting, J. F. 1986, Icarus, 68, 462, 10.1016/0019-1035(86)90051-5

    1986 doi

  237. [245]

    J., Kasting, J

    Zahnle, K. J., Kasting, J. F., & Pollack, J. B. 1988, Icarus, 74, 62, 10.1016/0019-1035(88)90031-0

    1988 doi

  238. [246]

    J., Lupu, R., Dobrovolskis, A., & Sleep, N

    Zahnle, K. J., Lupu, R., Dobrovolskis, A., & Sleep, N. H. 2015, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 427, 74, 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.06.058

    2015 doi

  239. [247]

    Zilinskas , M., van Buchem , C. P. A., Zieba , S., et al. 2025, , 697, A34, 10.1051/0004-6361/202554062

    2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed June 25, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.