pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.25413 · v1 · pith:SYFHS7ZBnew · submitted 2026-06-24 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP · astro-ph.GA

Resonant Super-Earths Dancing With EKL Oscillations: TTV Phase Excitation and Resonance Disruption by EKL Interactions between a Cold Jupiter and Stellar Companion

Pin-Gao Gu , Gongjie Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 20:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.GA
keywords EKL mechanismtransit timing variationsresonant super-Earthscold Jupitersstellar companionsresonance disruptionKepler planetsdynamical excitation
0
0 comments X

The pith

EKL interactions between a cold Jupiter and stellar companion can excite TTV phases and disrupt near-resonances in inner super-Earth pairs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether the eccentric Kozai-Lidov mechanism acting on an outer cold Jupiter perturbed by a stellar companion can influence the dynamics of inner near-resonant super-Earths. Simulations show that these outer EKL oscillations excite nonzero transit timing variation phases, increase the libration amplitudes of resonant angles, and disrupt the resonances in a significant fraction of cases over 16 million years. This connects the mechanism known to produce eccentric cold Jupiters to the observed dynamical heat in close-in resonant pairs. Readers would care if this explains why some Kepler planets show circulating resonant angles and nonzero TTV phases without damping.

Core claim

The EKL model that drives the observed eccentricity of cold Jupiters can also excite TTV phases, increase the libration amplitude of resonant angles away from ideal geometric alignment, and even disrupt them in a significant fraction of planetary systems in our simulated samples over 16 Myr. We also find that the TTV phases of the resonant pairs tend to be small (< 90 degrees), while the resonant angles are more easily elevated to become circulating during EKL excitation.

What carries the argument

The eccentric Kozai-Lidov (EKL) mechanism, in which a stellar companion induces eccentricity and inclination oscillations in a cold Jupiter that then perturbs the inner resonant super-Earth pair.

If this is right

  • TTV phases tend to remain small, less than 90 degrees.
  • Resonant angles are more readily driven to circulating states than TTV phases.
  • Resonances are disrupted in a significant fraction of systems over 16 Myr.
  • Close-in resonant pairs become dynamically hotter due to outer EKL excitation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This mechanism may explain the observed trend that circulating near-resonant planets are more dynamically unstable.
  • Systems with detected stellar companions and cold Jupiters could be checked for higher rates of resonance disruption.
  • Longer integrations or varied initial conditions might reveal if disruption rates increase with time.

Load-bearing premise

The EKL-driven eccentricity oscillations of the cold Jupiter are the dominant perturbation on the inner resonant pair, and the initial conditions plus 16 Myr integration time represent real systems.

What would settle it

A survey finding no difference in TTV phase distributions or resonance libration amplitudes between near-resonant super-Earth systems that have cold Jupiters with stellar companions versus those that do not.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.25413 by Gongjie Li, Pin-Gao Gu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: An evolutionary gallery of five examples of planetary systems over a timespan of 16 Myr: extreme EKL (top row), strong EKL (second row), mild EKL (third row), weak EKL (fourth row), and decoupled EKL (bottom row). Each row illustrates the evolution of the semimajor axis and periapsis distance of the cold Jupiter (aCJ, qCJ), the fractional deviation from exact mean-motion commensurability ∆, the orbital inc… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison of max (|ΦTTV,1|) and max(∆ϕ1), color-coded, for 2:1 (left panels) and 3:2 (right panels) res￾onant pairs in the r0.13 model in the absence of a stellar companion. The distribution of max (|ΦTTV,1|) is presented in relation to the cold Jupiter mass mCJ and the period ra￾tio PCJ/PSE1 (top panels), and as a function of min(qCJ) and the same period ratio (middle panels). The distribution of max(∆ϕ1… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Histogram of the probability distribution func￾tion (PDF) of max(|ΦTTV,1|), max(|ΦTTV,2|), max(∆ϕ1), and max(∆ϕ2) in the r0.13 model in the absence of a stel￾lar companion. The cases for the 2:1 and 3:2 resonances are shown for comparison. There is a deficit for max(|ΦTTV,1|) and max(|ΦTTV,2|) ≲ 25◦ and an excess for them > 25◦ in the 2:1 resonance compared to the 3:2 one. The PDFs of max(∆ϕ1) and max(∆ϕ2)… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: compares the PDF of the maximum TTV phase and maximum libration amplitude of resonant an￾gles between the 2:1 and 3:2 resonances. Owing to the weaker resonant coupling in the 2:1 resonance than 3:2, the inner pair member is less affected by the external EKL perturbation, and therefore tends to have a smaller max(|ΦTTV|) and max(∆ϕ) than the outer pair member. As shown in the top panels of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Same as the middle and bottom panels of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: A short segment of the TTV-phase evolution in one of the r0.13 runs for a 2:1 pair, showing an asymmetric correlation between ΦTTV,1 and ΦTTV,2. The top panel of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The upper panel shows a distribution of the simulated TTV phases of the 2:1 and 3:2 resonant pairs at t = 100 Myr for the r0.13 model. The lower panel shows the observed Kepler TTV phases of the 2:1 and 3:2 reso￾nant pairs, taken from S. Hadden & Y. Lithwick (2014), for the inner and outer members of each pair. ΦTTV,2 has been shifted by 180◦ to conform to the sign convention adopted by Y. Wu et al. (2024… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison of the 2:1 resonance capture in the absence (left panels) and presence (right panels) of a CJ of 1 Mjup on an eccentric orbit with aCJ = 0.5 au and eCJ = 0.1. B. TTV PHASES OF A NEAR-RESONANT PAIR B.1. Model and Calculation Y. Lithwick et al. (2012) formulated an analytical TTV theory for two coplanar planets near a first-order mean￾motion resonance (MMR), under the assumption that the resonant… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Comparison of the Kepler TTV phase distributions of near 2:1 and 3:2 MMRs from S. Hadden & Y. Lithwick (2014) (upper panel) and R. Li et al. (2025) (lower panel). Kepler pairs with uncertainties greater than 60◦ have been removed in the upper panel. The interval of ∆ is selected to range from 0 to 0.03 in these two distributions. The red dashed line corresponds to the exact symmetric correlation where ΦTT… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The ratio of 0.3Rtrunc to the initial values of aCJ for the planetary systems in the r0.13 model. Only the cases with small binary separations, astar2 ≲ 300 au, are shown, as circumstellar disks are most affected in close binaries. The red dashed line indicates 0.3Rtrunc = aCJ, below which a CJ is generally difficult to form via core accretion in the PAIRS model for a coplanar S-type binary. The initial m… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Near-resonant Kepler planets are dynamically hot, as evidenced by nonzero transit timing variation (TTV) phases, indicating that free eccentricities are not damped. Recent observations suggest that circulating near-resonant planets tend to be dynamically unstable, and hence dynamically hot, likely representing an intermediate stage in the close-in super-Earth population at young ages. We investigate whether a cold Jupiter interacting with a stellar companion through the eccentric Kozai-Lidov mechanism (EKL) can excite TTV phases and increase the libration amplitude of resonant angles in close-in resonant pairs. We find that the EKL model that drives the observed eccentricity of cold Jupiters can also excite TTV phases, increase the libration amplitude of resonant angles away from ideal geometric alignment, and even disrupt them in a significant fraction of planetary systems in our simulated samples over 16 Myr. We also find that the TTV phases of the resonant pairs tend to be small (< 90 degrees), while the resonant angles are more easily elevated to become circulating during EKL excitation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript explores whether eccentric Kozai-Lidov (EKL) oscillations induced by a cold Jupiter interacting with a stellar companion can excite nonzero TTV phases, increase libration amplitudes of resonant angles, and disrupt near-resonant super-Earth pairs. Numerical simulations over 16 Myr are reported to show that EKL excitation produces TTV phases typically below 90 degrees, elevates resonant angles away from ideal alignment, and disrupts resonances in a significant fraction of the simulated systems, providing a dynamical link between outer architecture and inner-system excitation observed in Kepler near-resonant planets.

Significance. If the reported fractions and phase behaviors are robust, the work would connect established EKL models for cold-Jupiter eccentricities to the dynamical heating of close-in resonant pairs, offering a testable mechanism for the observed population of dynamically hot near-resonant planets at young ages. The result is potentially significant for understanding resonance survival and TTV statistics, though its impact depends on verification that EKL dominates over competing effects.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that EKL 'can also excite TTV phases... and even disrupt them in a significant fraction' is presented without any reported sample size, disruption fraction, convergence tests, or quantitative error analysis, preventing assessment of whether the outcomes are robust or sensitive to initial conditions.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and simulation description: the modeling choice that EKL eccentricity oscillations of the cold Jupiter are the dominant perturbation on the inner resonant pair is invoked to attribute TTV-phase excitation and resonance disruption to EKL, yet no tests against competing effects (tides, planet-planet coupling, or additional companions) or damping are described, leaving the attribution unverified.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: the 16 Myr integration time is used to report outcomes, but no justification is given for why this duration is representative of typical system ages or sufficient to capture long-term resonance behavior, undermining the link between the simulated fractions and real-system implications.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'circulating near-resonant planets tend to be dynamically unstable' but provides no reference or prior result citation for this observational claim.
  2. [Abstract] Notation for resonant angles and TTV phases is introduced without explicit definitions or equations relating them to the EKL-driven eccentricity oscillations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful comments. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that EKL 'can also excite TTV phases... and even disrupt them in a significant fraction' is presented without any reported sample size, disruption fraction, convergence tests, or quantitative error analysis, preventing assessment of whether the outcomes are robust or sensitive to initial conditions.

    Authors: We agree the abstract should be more quantitative and self-contained. The main text reports the sample size, the disruption fraction in the simulated ensemble, and the numerical setup used to assess robustness. We will revise the abstract to incorporate these details directly, along with a brief statement on the checks performed. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and simulation description: the modeling choice that EKL eccentricity oscillations of the cold Jupiter are the dominant perturbation on the inner resonant pair is invoked to attribute TTV-phase excitation and resonance disruption to EKL, yet no tests against competing effects (tides, planet-planet coupling, or additional companions) or damping are described, leaving the attribution unverified.

    Authors: The work isolates the EKL channel to demonstrate it is capable of producing the reported effects, consistent with the observed eccentricities of cold Jupiters. We do not claim exclusivity over all other mechanisms. We will add a dedicated paragraph in the discussion section that explicitly states the modeling assumptions, notes the absence of competing effects in the current runs, and outlines why a focused EKL study is a necessary first step. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the 16 Myr integration time is used to report outcomes, but no justification is given for why this duration is representative of typical system ages or sufficient to capture long-term resonance behavior, undermining the link between the simulated fractions and real-system implications.

    Authors: The 16 Myr duration was selected to encompass multiple EKL cycles while remaining computationally tractable and relevant to the ages of observed young systems. We will revise the methods and abstract to include an explicit justification, supported by references to typical EKL timescales and the ages at which dynamical heating is inferred in the Kepler sample. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: outcomes emerge from numerical integrations

full rationale

The paper reports results from direct N-body simulations of EKL-driven eccentricity oscillations acting on inner resonant super-Earth pairs over 16 Myr. The claimed TTV phase excitation, libration amplitude growth, and resonance disruption are measured outputs of those integrations rather than quantities defined by the initial conditions, fitted parameters, or prior self-citations. The EKL mechanism itself is a standard, externally established dynamical process; the paper invokes it as an external driver without reducing its own predictions to a self-referential fit or renaming. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to the inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of the eccentric Kozai-Lidov mechanism to the cold Jupiter plus stellar companion and on the assumption that the simulated dynamical evolution accurately captures the interaction with the inner resonant pair; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption EKL mechanism operates between the cold Jupiter and stellar companion and couples to the inner resonant planets
    The abstract states that the EKL model drives the eccentricity of cold Jupiters and thereby affects the inner system.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5728 in / 1343 out tokens · 28295 ms · 2026-06-25T20:33:53.567900+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    C., Laughlin, G., & Bloch, A

    Adams, F. C., Laughlin, G., & Bloch, A. M. 2008, ApJ, 683, 1117, doi: 10.1086/589986

    work page doi:10.1086/589986 2008

  2. [2]

    Agol, E., & Fabrycky, D. C. 2018, in Handbook of Exoplanets, ed. H. J. Deeg & J. A. Belmonte, 7, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-55333-7 7

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55333-7 2018

  3. [3]

    J., Tennyson, J., Kaminsky, B

    Agol, E., Steffen, J., Sari, R., & Clarkson, W. 2005, MNRAS, 359, 567, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08922.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08922.x 2005

  4. [4]

    Antognini, J. M. O. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 3610, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1552

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1552 2015

  5. [5]

    Artymowicz, P., & Lubow, S. H. 1994, ApJ, 421, 651, doi: 10.1086/173679

    work page doi:10.1086/173679 1994

  6. [6]

    2026, ApJL, 999, L26, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae41c3

    Blunt, S., Wang, J., Murray-Clay, R., et al. 2026, ApJL, 999, L26, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae41c3

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae41c3 2026

  7. [7]

    S., Naponiello, L., Pezzetta, E., et al

    Bonomo, A. S., Naponiello, L., Pezzetta, E., et al. 2025, A&A, 700, A126, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452523

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452523 2025

  8. [8]

    L., & Lee, E

    Bryan, M. L., & Lee, E. J. 2025, ApJL, 982, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adb0bd

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adb0bd 2025

  9. [9]

    Chatterjee, S., & Ford, E. B. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal, 803, 33, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/803/1/33

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/803/1/33 2015

  10. [10]

    2025, MNRAS, 540, 1998, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf867

    Chen, Y.-X., Wu, Y., Li, Y.-P., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 540, 1998, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf867

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf867 2025

  11. [11]

    2020, MNRAS, 495, 4192, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1421

    Choksi, N., & Chiang, E. 2020, MNRAS, 495, 4192, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1421

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1421 2020

  12. [12]

    2023, MNRAS, 522, 1914, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad835

    Choksi, N., & Chiang, E. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 1914, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad835

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad835 2023

  13. [13]

    Cui, Z., Papaloizou, J. C. B., & Szuszkiewicz, E. 2021, ApJ, 921, 142, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac17eb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac17eb 2021

  14. [14]

    2023, AJ, 165, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aca327

    Dai, F., Masuda, K., Beard, C., et al. 2023, AJ, 165, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aca327

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aca327 2023

  15. [15]

    2024, AJ, 168, 239, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad83a6

    Dai, F., Goldberg, M., Batygin, K., et al. 2024, AJ, 168, 239, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad83a6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad83a6 2024

  16. [16]

    M., Payne, M., & Holman, M

    Deck, K. M., Payne, M., & Holman, M. J. 2013, ApJ, 774, 129, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/774/2/129

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/774/2/129 2013

  17. [17]

    Duffell and Eugene Chiang , title =

    Duffell, P. C., & Chiang, E. 2015, ApJ, 812, 94, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/812/2/94

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/812/2/94 2015

  18. [18]

    Eggleton, P. P. 1983, ApJ, 268, 368, doi: 10.1086/160960

    work page doi:10.1086/160960 1983

  19. [19]

    , year = 2007, month = nov, volume =

    Fabrycky, D., & Tremaine, S. 2007, ApJ, 669, 1298, doi: 10.1086/521702

    work page doi:10.1086/521702 2007

  20. [20]

    C., Lissauer, J

    Fabrycky, D. C., Lissauer, J. J., Ragozzine, D., et al. 2014, ApJ, 790, 146, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/790/2/146

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/790/2/146 2014

  21. [21]

    2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2206.06693, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2206.06693

    Ge, J., Zhang, H., Zang, W., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2206.06693, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2206.06693

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.06693 2022

  22. [22]

    2022, AJ, 163, 201, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac5961

    Goldberg, M., & Batygin, K. 2022, AJ, 163, 201, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac5961

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac5961 2022

  23. [23]

    2023, ApJ, 948, 12, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc9ae

    Goldberg, M., & Batygin, K. 2023, ApJ, 948, 12, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc9ae

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc9ae 2023

  24. [24]

    2022, Icarus, 388, 115206, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2022.115206

    Goldberg, M., Batygin, K., & Morbidelli, A. 2022, Icarus, 388, 115206, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2022.115206

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2022.115206 2022

  25. [25]

    Guo, K., Huang, X., & Lai, D. 2026, ApJ, 1003, 45, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae61a0 22 50 100 150 200 250 300 astar2 (au) 100 101 0.3 Rtrunc/aCJ 0 30 60 > 90 istar2 ( ) Figure 13.The ratio of 0.3R trunc to the initial values ofa CJ for the planetary systems in the r0.13 model. Only the cases with small binary separations,a star2 ≲300 au, are shown, as circum...

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae61a0 2026

  26. [26]

    2014, ApJ, 787, 80, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/787/1/80

    Hadden, S., & Lithwick, Y. 2014, ApJ, 787, 80, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/787/1/80

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/787/1/80 2014

  27. [27]

    2017, AJ, 154, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa71ef

    Hadden, S., & Lithwick, Y. 2017, AJ, 154, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa71ef

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa71ef 2017

  28. [28]

    2018, AJ, 156, 95, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aad32c

    Hadden, S., & Lithwick, Y. 2018, AJ, 156, 95, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aad32c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aad32c 2018

  29. [29]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.21349, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.21349

    Hadden, S., & Wu, Y. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.21349, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.21349

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.21349 2026

  30. [30]

    H., & Schlaufman, K

    Hamer, J. H., & Schlaufman, K. C. 2024, AJ, 167, 55, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad110e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad110e 2024

  31. [31]

    2025, AJ, 169, 19, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad944f

    Tamayo, D. 2025, AJ, 169, 19, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad944f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad944f 2025

  32. [32]

    Hansen, B. M. S. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 1531, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx182

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx182 2017

  33. [33]

    J., & Murray, N

    Holman, M. J., & Murray, N. W. 2005, Science, 307, 1288, doi: 10.1126/science.1107822

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1107822 2005

  34. [34]

    2025, ApJ, 995, 206, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae173c

    Hu, Z., Dai, F., Zhu, W., et al. 2025, ApJ, 995, 206, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae173c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae173c 2025

  35. [35]

    X., Petrovich, C., & Deibert, E

    Huang, C. X., Petrovich, C., & Deibert, E. 2017, AJ, 153, 210, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa67fb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa67fb 2017

  36. [36]

    Hwang, H.-C., Ting, Y.-S., & Zakamska, N. L. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 3383, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac675

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac675 2022

  37. [37]

    Jeans, J. H. 1919, MNRAS, 79, 408, doi: 10.1093/mnras/79.6.408

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/79.6.408 1919

  38. [38]

    R., & Wittenmyer, R

    Kane, S. R., & Wittenmyer, R. A. 2024, ApJL, 962, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad2463

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad2463 2024

  39. [39]

    Kouwenhoven, M. B. N., Goodwin, S. P., Parker, R. J., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 404, 1835, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16399.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16399.x 2010

  40. [40]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Lai, D., & Pu, B. 2017, AJ, 153, 42, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/153/1/42

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/153/1/42 2017

  41. [41]

    Lammers, C., & Winn, J. N. 2026, AJ, 171, 18, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ae21de

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae21de 2026

  42. [42]

    E., & Rasio, F

    Li, J., O’Connor, C. E., & Rasio, F. A. 2026, ApJL, 998, L5, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae3a9a

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae3a9a 2026

  43. [43]

    2025, AJ, 169, 323, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/adce0c 23

    Li, R., Chiang, E., Choksi, N., & Dai, F. 2025, AJ, 169, 323, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/adce0c 23

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/adce0c 2025

  44. [44]

    2025, ApJ, 994, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae17cf

    Lin, J., Dudiak, I., Hadden, S., & Tamayo, D. 2025, ApJ, 994, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae17cf

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae17cf 2025

  45. [45]

    2012, ApJL, 756, L11, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/756/1/L11

    Lithwick, Y., & Wu, Y. 2012, ApJL, 756, L11, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/756/1/L11

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/756/1/l11 2012

  46. [46]

    2012 , month =

    Lithwick, Y., Xie, J., & Wu, Y. 2012, ApJ, 761, 122, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/122

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/761/2/122 2012

  47. [47]

    H., Martin, R

    Lubow, S. H., Martin, R. G., & Nixon, C. 2015, ApJ, 800, 96, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/800/2/96

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/800/2/96 2015

  48. [48]

    F., Tazzari, M., Long, F., et al

    Manara, C. F., Tazzari, M., Long, F., et al. 2019, A&A, 628, A95, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935964

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935964 2019

  49. [49]

    Observing and data analysis systems, discovery and timing of 100 pulsars

    Mardling, R. A., & Aarseth, S. J. 2001, MNRAS, 321, 398, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.03974.x Mart´ ın, E. L., Bouy, H., Mart´ ın, D., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2312.01903, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2312.01903

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.03974.x 2001

  50. [50]

    2012, Icarus, 221, 624, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.08.032

    Matsumoto, Y., Nagasawa, M., & Ida, S. 2012, Icarus, 221, 624, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.08.032

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2012.08.032 2012

  51. [51]

    2020, ApJ, 893, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7cd7

    Matsumoto, Y., & Ogihara, M. 2020, ApJ, 893, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7cd7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab7cd7 2020

  52. [52]

    2015, MNRAS, 452, 2396, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1450

    Miranda, R., & Lai, D. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 2396, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1450

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1450 2015

  53. [53]

    Mind your Ps and Qs: the Interrelation between Period (P) and Mass-ratio (Q) Distributions of Binary Stars

    Moe, M., & Di Stefano, R. 2017, ApJS, 230, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aa6fb6

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aa6fb6 2017

  54. [54]

    doi:10.1017/CBO9781139174817 , adsurl =

    Murray, C. D., & Dermott, S. F. 1999, Solar System Dynamics, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139174817

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174817 1999

  55. [55]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society468(3), 3000–3023 (2017) https://doi

    Mustill, A. J., Davies, M. B., & Johansen, A. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 3000, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx693

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx693 2017

  56. [56]

    2016, ARA&A, 54, 441, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023315

    Naoz, S. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 441, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023315 Nesvorn´ y, D., & Vokrouhlick´ y, D. 2016, ApJ, 823, 72, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/72

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023315 2016

  57. [57]

    2026, A&A, 708, A38, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557244

    Nigioni, A., Venturini, J., Bolmont, E., et al. 2026, A&A, 708, A38, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557244

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557244 2026

  58. [58]

    Offner, S. S. R., Moe, M., Kratter, K. M., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 275, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.10066

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.10066 2023

  59. [59]

    2026, ApJ, 996, 91, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1d78

    Ogihara, M., & Kunitomo, M. 2026, ApJ, 996, 91, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1d78

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1d78 2026

  60. [60]

    2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Paardekooper, S., Dong, R., Duffell, P., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 685, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.09595

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.09595 2023

  61. [61]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Petrovich, C. 2015, ApJ, 799, 27, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/27

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/799/1/27 2015

  62. [62]

    A Survey of Stellar Families: Multiplicity of Solar-Type Stars

    Raghavan, D., McAlister, H. A., Henry, T. J., et al. 2010, ApJS, 190, 1, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/190/1/1

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0067-0049/190/1/1 2010

  63. [63]

    Science , keywords =

    Rasio, F. A., & Ford, E. B. 1996, Science, 274, 954, doi: 10.1126/science.274.5289.954

    work page doi:10.1126/science.274.5289.954 1996

  64. [64]

    REBOUND: An open-source multi-purpose N-body code for collisional dynamics

    Rein, H., & Liu, S.-F. 2012, A&A, 537, A128, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118085

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118085 2012

  65. [65]

    Rein, H., & Spiegel, D. S. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 1424, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2164

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2164 2015

  66. [66]

    A., Manara, C

    Rota, A. A., Manara, C. F., Miotello, A., et al. 2022, A&A, 662, A121, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141035

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141035 2022

  67. [67]

    F., Coughlin, J

    Rowe, J. F., Coughlin, J. L., Antoci, V., et al. 2015, ApJS, 217, 16, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/217/1/16

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/217/1/16 2015

  68. [68]

    Takeda, G., & Rasio, F. A. 2005, ApJ, 627, 1001, doi: 10.1086/430467

    work page doi:10.1086/430467 2005

  69. [69]

    Tamayo, D., Rein, H., Shi, P., & Hernandez, D. M. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 2885, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2870

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2870 2020

  70. [70]

    Tanaka, H., Takeuchi, T., & Ward, W. R. 2002, The Astrophysical Journal, 565, 1257, doi: 10.1086/324713

    work page doi:10.1086/324713 2002

  71. [71]

    2026, AJ, 171, 135, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ae346d

    Wang, M.-T., Dai, F., Liu, H.-G., et al. 2026, AJ, 171, 135, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ae346d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae346d 2026

  72. [72]

    C., Naoz, S., & Hansen, B

    Weldon, G. C., Naoz, S., & Hansen, B. M. S. 2025, ApJL, 980, L31, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adb157

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adb157 2025

  73. [73]

    2024, ApJ, 971, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5a09

    Wu, Y., Malhotra, R., & Lithwick, Y. 2024, ApJ, 971, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5a09

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5a09 2024

  74. [74]

    2003, ApJ, 589, 605, doi: 10.1086/374598

    Wu, Y., & Murray, N. 2003, ApJ, 589, 605, doi: 10.1086/374598

    work page doi:10.1086/374598 2003

  75. [75]

    2026, ApJ, 996, 59, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae201b

    Yang, E., & Su, Y. 2026, ApJ, 996, 59, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae201b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae201b 2026

  76. [76]

    Vorobyov, E. I. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.02395, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.02395

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.02395 2026

  77. [77]

    The Super Earth–Cold Jupiter Relations , volume=

    Zhu, W., & Wu, Y. 2018, AJ, 156, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aad22a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aad22a 2018