pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.26026 · v1 · pith:GMSQHUMInew · submitted 2026-06-24 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP

Can giant impacts be directly detected in other star systems?

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 19:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP
keywords giant impactsplanet formationGaia photometryLSSTpost-impact remnantsluminosity evolutionterrestrial planetshydrodynamic simulations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Giant impacts between Earth-composition planets produce post-impact bodies with luminosities from 5e-5 to 0.1 solar that cool over 1-2000 days, creating detectable brighten-then-dim signals in Gaia and LSST photometry.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper runs smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations of collisions between planets with total masses from 0.2 to 4 Earth masses. It locates the photic surface of each remnant to calculate initial luminosity and cooling behavior. The resulting bodies reach luminosities between 5 times 10 to the minus 5 and 0.1 solar luminosities and fade roughly exponentially. This produces a transient signature of sudden brightening followed by gradual dimming in optical and near-infrared bands. Scaling by estimated planet and impact rates yields a prediction of 0 to 14 detections in Gaia DR4 and a similar number in LSST.

Core claim

Giant impacts between Earth-composition planets were simulated using the smoothed particle hydrodynamics code SWIFT, with total colliding masses ranging from 0.2 to 4 Earth masses. By constraining the location of the photic surface of the post-impact bodies produced by the simulations, the initial luminosities of post-impact bodies were found to be between 5 times 10 to the minus 5 and 10 to the minus 1 solar luminosities, with luminosity falling roughly exponentially on a timescale between 1 and 2000 days. Based on our results, along with estimates for planet and giant impact occurrence rates, we anticipate that between 0 and 14 terrestrial giant impacts will be observed in the full release

What carries the argument

Smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations of giant impacts with photic surface location used to derive initial luminosity and exponential cooling timescale of the post-impact body.

If this is right

  • Giant impacts appear as sudden brightenings followed by gradual dimming in optical and near-infrared photometry.
  • Between 0 and 14 terrestrial giant impacts are expected in Gaia DR4 epoch photometry.
  • A comparable number of events should appear in LSST data.
  • Multiple identified remnants would directly constrain the galactic frequency of giant impacts during planet formation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Detections would allow direct measurement of how often giant impacts occur across many star systems rather than relying on solar-system statistics alone.
  • Non-detections would place tighter upper limits on the role of giant impacts in shaping the observed exoplanet population.
  • The same cooling models could be applied to future time-domain surveys or multi-wavelength follow-up to refine occurrence-rate estimates.

Load-bearing premise

Planet occurrence rates and giant impact occurrence rates are used to scale the simulated luminosities into expected detection numbers.

What would settle it

Zero detections or more than 14 detections of the predicted brighten-then-dim transients in the full Gaia DR4 epoch photometry would falsify the rate estimate.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.26026 by Amy Bonsor, Cathie. J. Clarke, Pavan Tanna, Simon Hodgkin, Simon Lock.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Cumulative histogram showing, for a given impact luminosity, the proportion of stars in the Gaia sample where this impact is detectable, as calculated in §2.6.1. The plot shows this detectable proportion for Gaia’s and LSST’s sensitivity with 3 and 5 sigma detections. This plot does not take into account that giant impacts only happen around young stars. nitude 𝑚𝑔,∗) after an impact with a brightness of 𝑛 … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Snapshots of the density in the midplane of the colliding bodies from a selection of impacts with varying impact parameters. The first impact is the baseline scenario, with the rest of the impacts shown having the same initial conditions aside from a single parameter changed. The second and third impacts show the effect that changing the mass has on the impact remnant. The fourth impact shows the effect of… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Initial luminosity (luminosity immediately after impact – an upper bound) and after cadence luminosity (luminosity after cooling for the survey cadence length – a lower bound), and cooling time of all simulated giant impacts (see also [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Plot showing simulated Gaia epoch photometry observations of two simulated giant impacts (from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: 2D histogram showing the distribution of stars in the Gaia catalogue which allow a 3-sigma detection of a giant impact on an HR diagram. The vast majority of stars where giant impacts are detectable have an effective temperature below 3700 K and are hence M dwarfs. A small number are K type stars and none are G type or brighter. of hotter material to maintain the hydrostatic structure. If droplets (or mult… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Plot showing the number of post-impact bodies expected to be detectable with Gaia and LSST in the Gaia catalogue across a 5 and 10 year observing period, calculated using the Monte Carlo method. 10 7 10 8 10 9 10 10 10 11 10 12 10 13 10 14 10 15 Inner pressure limit (Pa) 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 Cooling time (days) Sim 2 (0.5 M ) Sim 0 (1.0 M ) Sim 5 (2.0 M ) Sim 7 (4.0 M ) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p0… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Plot showing how altering the pressure limit changes the post￾impact body cooling time for four simulations. At pressure limits above 1013 Pa, all of the energy of the post-impact body is radiated away. Lower pressure limits lead to a much smaller cooling time. Hill sphere will become unbound (see Rufu & Aharonson 2018, for a study of this effect in circum-planetary impacts), reducing the size of the post-… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Phase diagram show how the absorption coefficient of silicate changes with specific entropy and pressure, calculated using the forsterite equation of state (Stewart et al. 2019) and the optical absorption model (Kraus et al. 2012), taking into account droplet absorption. The silicate vapour becomes optically thin at the length scales of a post-impact body at pressures below around 104 Pa in the vapour phas… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Omitting droplet removal has a minimal effect on the luminosity but can change the cooling time. However, the change in cooling time is not significant enough to alter the observability of any impact. The initial luminosity cooling timescale for Simulations 0 to 6 with their orbital period set at 10 days, as described in §4.1.2. 10 3 10 2 10 1 Initial L u min osity (L ) Sim 2 (0.50 M ) Sim 0 (1.00 M ) Sim… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The effect of altering the orbital period of the post-impact body on the initial luminosity and cooling time for a range of simulations. massive super-Earths (with masses up to 10 𝑀⊕), sub-Neptunes, Neptunes and gas-giant planets have not been considered. Such plan￾ets make up a large number of known exoplanets with super-Earths thought to be the most common type of terrestrial planet (Neil & Rogers 2020)… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Giant impacts, collisions between planet-sized bodies, play an important role in planet and moon formation. As we enter a new era of large-scale surveys, such as \textit{Gaia} and LSST at the Vera C. Rubin observatory, there is potential to directly observe the remnants produced in such events and gain insights into the process of planet formation. Here, by modelling the emission and cooling of a series of giant impact remnants, we show that giant impacts are detectable as a sudden brightening followed by gradual dimming in the optical and near-infrared. Giant impacts between Earth-composition planets were simulated using the smoothed particle hydrodynamics code {\small SWIFT}, with total colliding masses ranging from 0.2 to 4 $M_{\oplus}$. By constraining the location of the photic surface of the post-impact bodies produced by the simulations, the initial luminosities of post-impact bodies were found to be between $5\times10^{-5}$ and $10^{-1}$ solar luminosities, with luminosity falling roughly exponentially on a timescale between 1 and 2000 days. Based on our results, along with estimates for planet and giant impact occurrence rates, we anticipate that between 0 and 14 terrestrial giant impacts will be observed in the full release of \textit{Gaia} epoch photometry in DR4, with at least a comparable number found by LSST. Identifying the remnants of multiple giant impacts will offer a powerful constraint on the frequency of giant impacts in the galaxy and hence the role of such collisions in planet formation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations with the SWIFT code to model giant impacts between Earth-composition planets (total masses 0.2–4 M_⊕). It derives initial post-impact luminosities of 5×10^{-5} to 10^{-1} L_⊙ by locating the photic surface and finds roughly exponential cooling on timescales of 1–2000 days. These results are combined with literature estimates of planet occurrence and giant-impact rates to predict 0–14 detectable events in Gaia DR4 (and a comparable number in LSST) via sudden brightening followed by gradual dimming in optical/near-IR photometry.

Significance. If the luminosity and cooling calculations hold, the work identifies a concrete photometric signature that could allow direct observation of giant impacts, offering an independent constraint on their frequency during planet formation. The use of SPH runs across a mass range to produce observable quantities is a clear strength. However, the headline detection numbers (0–14) are not robust because they scale directly with external occurrence-rate inputs whose uncertainties dominate the reported range.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the quantitative prediction of 0–14 events in Gaia DR4 is obtained by multiplying simulation-derived per-event luminosities and cooling timescales by external estimates of terrestrial planet occurrence and giant-impact frequency. These rates are drawn from the literature rather than derived or validated within the manuscript; the resulting broad interval (0–14) therefore reflects the span of those external inputs, not the simulation results alone. This scaling dependence is load-bearing for the central claim of survey yields.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the photic surface location is constrained from the simulations, but provides no detail on the method, temperature or optical-depth criterion used, or any validation against known post-impact states; this step is central to the reported luminosity range and should be expanded.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and constructive comments. We agree that the detection-yield range depends on external literature estimates and will revise the abstract to clarify this distinction.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the quantitative prediction of 0–14 events in Gaia DR4 is obtained by multiplying simulation-derived per-event luminosities and cooling timescales by external estimates of terrestrial planet occurrence and giant-impact frequency. These rates are drawn from the literature rather than derived or validated within the manuscript; the resulting broad interval (0–14) therefore reflects the span of those external inputs, not the simulation results alone. This scaling dependence is load-bearing for the central claim of survey yields.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that the 0–14 range arises from the span of literature occurrence rates rather than from the SPH results alone. The manuscript’s core contribution is the simulation-derived luminosities (5×10^{-5} to 10^{-1} L_⊙) and cooling timescales (1–2000 days). The yield estimate is presented as an order-of-magnitude illustration of detectability, using the rates cited in the text. We will revise the abstract to state the simulation results first, followed by the statement that, when combined with literature estimates of planet occurrence and giant-impact frequency, we anticipate 0–14 events in Gaia DR4. This makes the dependence explicit without changing the primary findings. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper derives initial luminosities (5e-5 to 0.1 Lsun) and exponential cooling timescales (1-2000 days) directly from SWIFT SPH simulations of Earth-composition collisions (0.2-4 Mearth) plus photic surface constraints; these steps are independent of occurrence rates. The 0-14 Gaia DR4 detection estimate is obtained by scaling the simulation outputs with external literature estimates for planet/giant-impact rates, which are not fitted, self-derived, or reduced to the paper's own inputs by construction. No self-citation load-bearing, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes appear in the derivation. The central luminosity modeling is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The detection forecast rests on external occurrence-rate estimates and on domain assumptions about how to locate the photic surface in the SPH output; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • planet and giant impact occurrence rates
    These rates are multiplied by the per-event detectability derived from simulations to obtain the 0-14 prediction; they are not derived inside the work.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Photic surface location can be reliably constrained from the post-impact SPH particle distributions for Earth-composition bodies
    This step converts simulation snapshots into initial luminosities and cooling curves.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5817 in / 1282 out tokens · 34896 ms · 2026-06-25T19:21:51.583706+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 90 canonical work pages · 31 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Satellite-Sized Planetesimals and Lunar Origin. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(75)90070-6 , adsurl =

  2. [2]

    Lunar and Planetary Science Conference , year = 1976, series =

    The Origin of the Moon. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference , year = 1976, series =

  3. [3]

    Origin of the Moon , year = 1986, editor =

    Moon over Mauna Loa: a review of hypotheses of formation of Earth's Moon. Origin of the Moon , year = 1986, editor =

  4. [4]

    2020, Solar elemental abundances (Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Planetary Science), doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190647926.013.145

    The Formation of the Martian Moons. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Planetary Science , year = 2020, eid =. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190647926.013.24 , adsurl =

  5. [5]

    , year = 2001, month = aug, volume =

    Origin of the Moon in a giant impact near the end of the Earth's formation. , year = 2001, month = aug, volume =

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    Making the Terrestrial Planets: N-Body Integrations of Planetary Embryos in Three Dimensions. , keywords =. doi:10.1006/icar.1998.6007 , adsurl =

  7. [7]

    Space Science Reviews , author =

    Geochemical Constraints on the Origin of the Moon and Preservation of Ancient Terrestrial Heterogeneities. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11214-020-00729-z , adsurl =

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    A Star-sized Impact-produced Dust Clump in the Terrestrial Zone of the HD 166191 System. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4bbb , archivePrefix =. 2203.02366 , primaryClass =

  9. [9]

    , keywords =

    The Origin of Mercury. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11214-007-9284-1 , adsurl =

  10. [10]

    , keywords =

    One-dimensional calculations of a large impact on Uranus. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(90)90051-A , adsurl =

  11. [11]

    and Kegerreis, Jacob A

    Dealing with density discontinuities in planetary SPH simulations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac857 , archivePrefix =. 2202.00472 , primaryClass =

  12. [12]

    The Pluto System After New Horizons , year = 2021, editor =

    On the Origin of the Pluto System. The Pluto System After New Horizons , year = 2021, editor =. doi:10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816540945-ch021 , adsurl =

  13. [13]

    , year = 2011, month = feb, volume =

    Are Phobos and Deimos the result of a giant impact?. , year = 2011, month = feb, volume =. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2010.10.023 , adsurl =

  14. [14]

    , year = 2012, month = nov, volume =

    On the formation of the martian moons from a circum-martian accretion disk. , year = 2012, month = nov, volume =. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2012.09.009 , adsurl =

  15. [15]

    Formation of Phobos and Deimos via a Giant Impact

    Formation of Phobos and Deimos via a giant impact. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2015.02.011 , archivePrefix =. 1503.05623 , primaryClass =

  16. [16]

    Science Advances , year = 2018, month = apr, volume =

    Origin of Phobos and Deimos by the impact of a Vesta-to-Ceres sized body with Mars. Science Advances , year = 2018, month = apr, volume =. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aar6887 , adsurl =

  17. [17]

    The Frequency of Giant impacts on Earth-like Worlds

    The Frequency of Giant Impacts on Earth-like Worlds. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/126 , archivePrefix =. 1511.03663 , primaryClass =

  18. [18]

    A hit-and-run Giant Impact scenario

    A hit-and-run giant impact scenario. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2012.07.021 , archivePrefix =. 1207.5224 , primaryClass =

  19. [19]

    Science , keywords =

    Forming a Moon with an Earth-like Composition via a Giant Impact. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.1226073 , adsurl =

  20. [20]

    Science , keywords =

    Making the Moon from a Fast-Spinning Earth: A Giant Impact Followed by Resonant Despinning. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.1225542 , adsurl =

  21. [21]

    The origin of the Moon within a terrestrial synestia

    The Origin of the Moon Within a Terrestrial Synestia. Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets) , keywords =. doi:10.1002/2017JE005333 , archivePrefix =. 1802.10223 , primaryClass =

  22. [22]

    The structure of terrestrial bodies: Impact heating, corotation limits and synestias

    The structure of terrestrial bodies: Impact heating, corotation limits, and synestias. Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets) , keywords =. doi:10.1002/2016JE005239 , archivePrefix =. 1705.07858 , primaryClass =

  23. [23]

    49th Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference , year = 2018, series =

    When Moons Collide: Surface Mixing and Thermal State. 49th Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference , year = 2018, series =

  24. [24]

    , keywords =

    Immediate Origin of the Moon as a Post-impact Satellite. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac8d96 , archivePrefix =. 2210.01814 , primaryClass =

  25. [25]

    Consequences of Giant Impacts on Early Uranus for Rotation, Internal Structure, Debris, and Atmospheric Erosion

    Consequences of Giant Impacts on Early Uranus for Rotation, Internal Structure, Debris, and Atmospheric Erosion. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac725 , archivePrefix =. 1803.07083 , primaryClass =

  26. [26]

    , keywords =

    A planetary collision afterglow and transit of the resultant debris cloud. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06573-9 , archivePrefix =. 2310.08360 , primaryClass =

  27. [27]

    2023 , url =

    cosmos.esa , author =. 2023 , url =

  28. [28]

    2026 , url =

    cosmos.esa , author =. 2026 , url =

  29. [29]

    doi:10.71929/RUBIN/2584021 , adsurl =

    RTN-011: Rubin Observatory Plans for an Early Science Program. doi:10.71929/RUBIN/2584021 , adsurl =

  30. [30]

    The Variable Sky of Deep Synoptic Surveys

    The Variable Sky of Deep Synoptic Surveys. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/796/1/53 , archivePrefix =. 1409.3265 , primaryClass =

  31. [31]

    LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products

    LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c , archivePrefix =. 0805.2366 , primaryClass =

  32. [32]

    Galactic Stellar Populations in the Era of SDSS and Other Large Surveys

    Galactic Stellar Populations in the Era of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and Other Large Surveys. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125504 , archivePrefix =. 1308.6386 , primaryClass =

  33. [33]

    Earth and Planetary Science Letters , author =

    The energy budget and figure of Earth during recovery from the Moon-forming giant impact. Earth and Planetary Science Letters , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2019.115885 , archivePrefix =. 1910.00619 , primaryClass =

  34. [34]

    , keywords =

    Early evolution of the Earth-Moon system with a fast-spinning Earth. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2015.02.025 , adsurl =

  35. [35]

    Tidal evolution of the Moon from a high-obliquity, high-angular-momentum Earth

    Tidal evolution of the Moon from a high-obliquity, high-angular-momentum Earth. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/nature19846 , archivePrefix =. 1802.03356 , primaryClass =

  36. [36]

    AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts , year = 2020, series =

    High-Obliquity Early Earth Revisited. AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts , year = 2020, series =

  37. [37]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Science , keywords =

    Vertical angular momentum constraint on lunar formation and orbital history. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science , keywords =. doi:10.1073/pnas.2003496117 , adsurl =

  38. [38]

    Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets) , keywords =

    The Energy Budgets of Giant Impacts. Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets) , keywords =. doi:10.1029/2019JE006042 , archivePrefix =. 1912.04936 , primaryClass =

  39. [39]

    , keywords =

    Forming Diverse Super-Earth Systems In Situ. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab6f04 , archivePrefix =. 2001.06531 , primaryClass =

  40. [40]

    Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society , year = 2022, volume =

    The effects of collisional fragmentation on the formation of super-Earths. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society , year = 2022, volume =

  41. [41]

    , keywords =

    The 'breaking the chains' migration model for super-Earth formation: the effect of collisional fragmentation. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3203 , archivePrefix =. 2111.00059 , primaryClass =

  42. [42]

    Breaking the Chains: Hot Super-Earth systems from migration and disruption of compact resonant chains

    Breaking the chains: hot super-Earth systems from migration and disruption of compact resonant chains. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1232 , archivePrefix =. 1703.03634 , primaryClass =

  43. [43]

    , keywords =

    Forming iron-rich planets with giant impacts. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1853 , archivePrefix =. 2204.04925 , primaryClass =

  44. [44]

    Water/Icy Super-Earths: Giant Impacts and Maximum Water Content

    Water/Icy Super-Earths: Giant Impacts and Maximum Water Content. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/719/1/L45 , archivePrefix =. 1007.3212 , primaryClass =

  45. [45]

    Collisional Stripping and Disruption of Super-Earths

    Collisional Stripping and Disruption of Super-Earths. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/L118 , archivePrefix =. 0907.0234 , primaryClass =

  46. [46]

    Nature Communications , keywords =

    Large planets may not form fractionally large moons. Nature Communications , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28063-8 , archivePrefix =. 2312.15050 , primaryClass =

  47. [47]

    Collisional stripping of planetary crusts

    Collisional stripping of planetary crusts. Earth and Planetary Science Letters , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2017.12.012 , archivePrefix =. 1712.02790 , primaryClass =

  48. [48]

    Nature Geoscience , year = 2025, month = jan, volume =

    Capture of an ancient Charon around Pluto. Nature Geoscience , year = 2025, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1038/s41561-024-01612-0 , adsurl =

  49. [49]

    , keywords =

    Carbon monoxide gas produced by a giant impact in the inner region of a young system. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03872-x , archivePrefix =. 2110.15377 , primaryClass =

  50. [50]

    Abundant Circumstellar Silica Dust and SiO Gas Created by a Giant Hypervelocity Collision in the ~12 Myr HD172555 System

    Abundant Circumstellar Silica Dust and SiO Gas Created by a Giant Hypervelocity Collision in the -0.5ex 12 Myr HD172555 System. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/701/2/2019 , archivePrefix =. 0906.2536 , primaryClass =

  51. [51]

    Extreme Debris Disk Variability -- Exploring the Diverse Outcomes of Large Asteroid Impacts During the Era of Terrestrial Planet Formation

    Extreme Debris Disk Variability: Exploring the Diverse Outcomes of Large Asteroid Impacts During the Era of Terrestrial Planet Formation. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab1260 , archivePrefix =. 1903.10627 , primaryClass =

  52. [52]

    Collisions between Gravity-dominated Bodies. I. Outcome Regimes and Scaling Laws. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/745/1/79 , archivePrefix =. 1106.6084 , primaryClass =

  53. [53]

    Building the Terrestrial Planets: Constrained Accretion in the Inner Solar System

    Building the terrestrial planets: Constrained accretion in the inner Solar System. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2009.05.016 , archivePrefix =. 0905.3750 , primaryClass =

  54. [54]

    Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets) , keywords =

    Shock vaporization of silica and the thermodynamics of planetary impact events. Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets) , keywords =. doi:10.1029/2012JE004082 , adsurl =

  55. [55]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Science , year = 2018, month = may, volume =

    Critical vaporization of MgSiO3. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science , year = 2018, month = may, volume =. doi:10.1073/pnas.1719134115 , adsurl =

  56. [56]

    Davies, E. J. and Carter, P. J. and Root, S. and Kraus, R. G. and Spaulding, D. K. and Stewart, S. T. and Jacobsen, S. B. , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JE006227 , url =. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2019JE006227 , note =

  57. [57]

    Earth and Planetary Science Letters , author =

    Razvan Caracas and Sarah T. Stewart , keywords =. No magma ocean surface after giant impacts between rocky planets , journal =. 2023 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118014 , url =

  58. [58]

    AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts , year = 2019, series =

    Liquid-vapor coexistence and critical point of Mg _ 2 SiO _ 4 from ab-initio simulations. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts , year = 2019, series =

  59. [59]

    Shock equation of state and critical vaporization of

    Xu, Fei-Yang and Li, Zhi-Guo and Song, Hongxing and Liu, Lei and Geng, Huayun and Chen, Xiang-Rong and Hu, Jianbo , journal =. Shock equation of state and critical vaporization of. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1103/54bx-5f2n , url =

  60. [60]

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A , year = 2014, month = aug, volume =

    New approaches to the Moon's isotopic crisis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A , year = 2014, month = aug, volume =. doi:10.1098/rsta.2013.0168 , adsurl =

  61. [61]

    SWIFT: SPH With Inter-dependent Fine-grained Tasking

  62. [62]

    2020 , publisher =

    Josh Borrow and Alexei Borrisov , title =. 2020 , publisher =. doi:10.21105/joss.02430 , url =

  63. [63]

    Hunter, J. D. , Title =. Computing in Science & Engineering , Volume =

  64. [64]

    R., Millman, K

    Charles R. Harris and K. Jarrod Millman and St. Array programming with. 2020 , month = sep, journal =. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 , publisher =

  65. [65]

    and Haberland, Matt and Reddy, Tyler and Cournapeau, David and Burovski, Evgeni and Peterson, Pearu and Weckesser, Warren and Bright, Jonathan and

    Virtanen, Pauli and Gommers, Ralf and Oliphant, Travis E. and Haberland, Matt and Reddy, Tyler and Cournapeau, David and Burovski, Evgeni and Peterson, Pearu and Weckesser, Warren and Bright, Jonathan and. Nature Methods , year =

  66. [66]

    Goldbaum and John A

    Nathan J. Goldbaum and John A. ZuHone and Matthew J. Turk and Kacper Kowalik and Anna L. Rosen , title =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.21105/joss.00809 , url =

  67. [67]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Ruiz-Bonilla, S and Eke, V R and Kegerreis, J A and Massey, R J and Teodoro, L F A , title = ". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3385 , url =

  68. [68]

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.3478631 , version =

    Equation of State Model Forsterite-ANEOS-SLVTv1.0G1: Documentation and Comparisons. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3478631 , version =

  69. [69]

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.3866507 , version =

    Equation of State Model Iron ANEOS: Documentation and Comparisons (Version SLVTv0.2G1). doi:10.5281/zenodo.3866507 , version =

  70. [70]

    Investigation of the Initial State of the Moon-Forming Disk: Bridging SPH Simulations and Hydrostatic Models

    Investigation of the initial state of the Moon-forming disk: Bridging SPH simulations and hydrostatic models. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2014.01.008 , archivePrefix =. 1401.3036 , primaryClass =

  71. [71]

    Holton and Clifford Mass

    Terminal Velocity and Shape of Cloud and Precipitation Drops Aloft. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences , year = 1976, month = may, volume =. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033<0851:TVASOC>2.0.CO;2 , adsurl =

  72. [72]

    Astrophysical parameters inference system (Apsis)

    Gaia Data Release 3. Astrophysical parameters inference system (Apsis). I. Methods and content overview. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243688 , archivePrefix =. 2206.05864 , primaryClass =

  73. [73]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Planetary giant impacts: convergence of high-resolution simulations using efficient spherical initial conditions and SWIFT. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1606 , archivePrefix =. 1901.09934 , primaryClass =

  74. [74]

    On the use of Gaia magnitudes and new tables of bolometric corrections

    On the use of Gaia magnitudes and new tables of bolometric corrections. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sly104 , archivePrefix =. 1806.01953 , primaryClass =

  75. [75]

    Searching the Entirety of Kepler Data. II. Occurrence Rate Estimates for FGK Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab88b0 , archivePrefix =. 2004.05296 , primaryClass =

  76. [76]

    Terrestrial Planet Occurrence Rates for the Kepler GK Dwarf Sample

    Terrestrial Planet Occurrence Rates for the Kepler GK Dwarf Sample. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/8 , archivePrefix =. 1506.04175 , primaryClass =

  77. [77]

    The California-Kepler Survey. III. A Gap in the Radius Distribution of Small Planets. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa80eb , archivePrefix =. 1703.10375 , primaryClass =

  78. [78]

    , keywords =

    A Joint Mass-Radius-Period Distribution of Exoplanets. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab6a92 , archivePrefix =. 1911.03582 , primaryClass =

  79. [79]

    C., Ford, E

    Occurrence Rates of Planets Orbiting FGK Stars: Combining Kepler DR25, Gaia DR2, and Bayesian Inference. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab31ab , archivePrefix =. 1902.01417 , primaryClass =

  80. [80]

    , keywords =

    Sensitivity Analyses of Exoplanet Occurrence Rates from Kepler and Gaia. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab90fe , archivePrefix =. 1908.00203 , primaryClass =

Showing first 80 references.