pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 0805.2366 · v5 · submitted 2008-05-15 · 🌌 astro-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products

\v{Z}eljko Ivezi\'c , Steven M. Kahn , J. Anthony Tyson , Bob Abel , Emily Acosta , Robyn Allsman , David Alonso , Yusra AlSayyad
show 305 more authors
Scott F. Anderson John Andrew James Roger P. Angel George Z. Angeli Reza Ansari Pierre Antilogus Constanza Araujo Robert Armstrong Kirk T. Arndt Pierre Astier \'Eric Aubourg Nicole Auza Tim S. Axelrod Deborah J. Bard Jeff D. Barr Aurelian Barrau James G. Bartlett Amanda E. Bauer Brian J. Bauman Sylvain Baumont Andrew C. Becker Jacek Becla Cristina Beldica Steve Bellavia Federica B. Bianco Rahul Biswas Guillaume Blanc Jonathan Blazek Roger D. Blandford Josh S. Bloom Joanne Bogart Tim W. Bond Anders W. Borgland Kirk Borne James F. Bosch Dominique Boutigny Craig A. Brackett Andrew Bradshaw William Nielsen Brandt Michael E. Brown James S. Bullock Patricia Burchat David L. Burke Gianpietro Cagnoli Daniel Calabrese Shawn Callahan Alice L. Callen Srinivasan Chandrasekharan Glenaver Charles-Emerson Steve Chesley Elliott C. Cheu Hsin-Fang Chiang James Chiang Carol Chirino Derek Chow David R. Ciardi Charles F. Claver Johann Cohen-Tanugi Joseph J. Cockrum Rebecca Coles Andrew J. Connolly Kem H. Cook Asantha Cooray Kevin R. Covey Chris Cribbs Wei Cui Roc Cutri Philip N. Daly Scott F. Daniel Felipe Daruich Guillaume Daubard Greg Daues William Dawson Francisco Delgado Alfred Dellapenna Robert de Peyster Miguel de Val-Borro Seth W. Digel Peter Doherty Richard Dubois Gregory P. Dubois-Felsmann Josef Durech Frossie Economou Michael Eracleous Henry Ferguson Enrique Figueroa Merlin Fisher-Levine Warren Focke Michael D. Foss James Frank Michael D. Freemon Emmanuel Gangler Eric Gawiser John C. Geary Perry Gee Marla Geha Charles J. B. Gessner Robert R. Gibson D. Kirk Gilmore Thomas Glanzman William Glick Tatiana Goldina Daniel A. Goldstein Iain Goodenow Melissa L. Graham William J. Gressler Philippe Gris Leanne P. Guy Augustin Guyonnet Gunther Haller Ron Harris Patrick A. Hascall Justine Haupt Fabio Hernandez Sven Herrmann Edward Hileman Joshua Hoblitt John A. Hodgson Craig Hogan Dajun Huang Michael E. Huffer Patrick Ingraham Walter R. Innes Suzanne H. Jacoby Bhuvnesh Jain Fabrice Jammes James Jee Tim Jenness Garrett Jernigan Darko Jevremovi\'c Kenneth Johns Anthony S. Johnson Margaret W.G. Johnson R. Lynne Jones Claire Juramy-Gilles Mario Juri\'c Jason S. Kalirai Nitya J. Kallivayalil Bryce Kalmbach Jeffrey P. Kantor Pierre Karst Mansi M. Kasliwal Heather Kelly Richard Kessler Veronica Kinnison David Kirkby Lloyd Knox Ivan V. Kotov Victor L. Krabbendam K. Simon Krughoff Petr Kub\'anek John Kuczewski Shri Kulkarni John Ku Nadine R. Kurita Craig S. Lage Ron Lambert Travis Lange J. Brian Langton Laurent Le Guillou Deborah Levine Ming Liang Kian-Tat Lim Chris J. Lintott Kevin E. Long Margaux Lopez Paul J. Lotz Robert H. Lupton Nate B. Lust Lauren A. MacArthur Ashish Mahabal Rachel Mandelbaum Darren S. Marsh Philip J. Marshall Stuart Marshall Morgan May Robert McKercher Michelle McQueen Joshua Meyers Myriam Migliore Michelle Miller David J. Mills Connor Miraval Joachim Moeyens David G. Monet Marc Moniez Serge Monkewitz Christopher Montgomery Fritz Mueller Gary P. Muller Freddy Mu\~noz Arancibia Douglas R. Neill Scott P. Newbry Jean-Yves Nief Andrei Nomerotski Martin Nordby Paul O'Connor John Oliver Scot S. Olivier Knut Olsen William O'Mullane Sandra Ortiz Shawn Osier Russell E. Owen Reynald Pain Paul E. Palecek John K. Parejko James B. Parsons Nathan M. Pease J. Matt Peterson John R. Peterson Donald L. Petravick M.E. Libby Petrick Cathy E. Petry Francesco Pierfederici Stephen Pietrowicz Rob Pike Philip A. Pinto Raymond Plante Stephen Plate Paul A. Price Michael Prouza Veljko Radeka Jayadev Rajagopal Andrew P. Rasmussen Nicolas Regnault Kevin A. Reil David J. Reiss Michael A. Reuter Stephen T. Ridgway Vincent J. Riot Steve Ritz Sean Robinson William Roby Aaron Roodman Wayne Rosing Cecille Roucelle Matthew R. Rumore Stefano Russo Abhijit Saha Benoit Sassolas Terry L. Schalk Pim Schellart Rafe H. Schindler Samuel Schmidt Donald P. Schneider Michael D. Schneider William Schoening German Schumacher Megan E. Schwamb Jacques Sebag Brian Selvy Glenn H. Sembroski Lynn G. Seppala Andrew Serio Eduardo Serrano Richard A. Shaw Ian Shipsey Jonathan Sick Nicole Silvestri Colin T. Slater J. Allyn Smith R. Chris Smith Shahram Sobhani Christine Soldahl Lisa Storrie-Lombardi Edward Stover Michael A. Strauss Rachel A. Street Christopher W. Stubbs Ian S. Sullivan Donald Sweeney John D. Swinbank Alexander Szalay Peter Takacs Stephen A. Tether Jon J. Thaler John Gregg Thayer Sandrine Thomas Vaikunth Thukral Jeffrey Tice David E. Trilling Max Turri Richard Van Berg Daniel Vanden Berk Kurt Vetter Francoise Virieux Tomislav Vucina William Wahl Lucianne Walkowicz Brian Walsh Christopher W. Walter Daniel L. Wang Shin-Yawn Wang Michael Warner Oliver Wiecha Beth Willman Scott E. Winters David Wittman Sidney C. Wolff W. Michael Wood-Vasey Xiuqin Wu Bo Xin Peter Yoachim Hu Zhan (for the LSST Collaboration)
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 08:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph
keywords willsurveylssttimeobservingsciencesinglesystem
0
0 comments X

The pith

LSST will image 18,000 square degrees of sky about 800 times across six bands over 10 years to a coadded depth of r~27.5, producing a public database of 40 billion objects and 32 trillion observations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The LSST uses an 8.4 meter primary mirror and a 3.2 gigapixel camera with a 9.6 square degree field of view. It takes pairs of 15-second exposures and can cover 10,000 square degrees in one filter every three nights. The main science goals are probing dark energy and dark matter, cataloging solar system bodies, finding changing objects like exploding stars, and mapping our galaxy. Most time goes to a deep wide fast survey mode, with the rest for special projects. All data will be released publicly as a huge relational database.

Core claim

The LSST system is capable of imaging about 10,000 square degrees of sky in a single filter in three nights. The typical 5 sigma point-source depth in a single visit in r will be ~24.5 (AB). The survey will yield a coadded map to r~27.5.

Load-bearing premise

The design assumes that the 8.4m telescope, 3.2 gigapixel camera, and site conditions at Cerro Pachon will deliver the stated image quality, depth, and operational efficiency starting in 2022.

read the original abstract

(Abridged) We describe here the most ambitious survey currently planned in the optical, the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST). A vast array of science will be enabled by a single wide-deep-fast sky survey, and LSST will have unique survey capability in the faint time domain. The LSST design is driven by four main science themes: probing dark energy and dark matter, taking an inventory of the Solar System, exploring the transient optical sky, and mapping the Milky Way. LSST will be a wide-field ground-based system sited at Cerro Pach\'{o}n in northern Chile. The telescope will have an 8.4 m (6.5 m effective) primary mirror, a 9.6 deg$^2$ field of view, and a 3.2 Gigapixel camera. The standard observing sequence will consist of pairs of 15-second exposures in a given field, with two such visits in each pointing in a given night. With these repeats, the LSST system is capable of imaging about 10,000 square degrees of sky in a single filter in three nights. The typical 5$\sigma$ point-source depth in a single visit in $r$ will be $\sim 24.5$ (AB). The project is in the construction phase and will begin regular survey operations by 2022. The survey area will be contained within 30,000 deg$^2$ with $\delta<+34.5^\circ$, and will be imaged multiple times in six bands, $ugrizy$, covering the wavelength range 320--1050 nm. About 90\% of the observing time will be devoted to a deep-wide-fast survey mode which will uniformly observe a 18,000 deg$^2$ region about 800 times (summed over all six bands) during the anticipated 10 years of operations, and yield a coadded map to $r\sim27.5$. The remaining 10\% of the observing time will be allocated to projects such as a Very Deep and Fast time domain survey. The goal is to make LSST data products, including a relational database of about 32 trillion observations of 40 billion objects, available to the public and scientists around the world.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to describe the science drivers, reference design, and anticipated data products for the LSST, a wide-field optical survey telescope. It links four science themes to specific technical specifications including an 8.4 m primary mirror, 9.6 deg² field of view, 3.2 Gigapixel camera, and a survey plan with 15 s exposures in pairs, achieving coverage of 10,000 square degrees in three nights per filter, single-visit depth ~24.5 in r, and coadded depth ~27.5 over 18,000 deg² with 800 visits in 10 years, producing a database of 32 trillion observations.

Significance. If realized, the LSST will provide transformative data for dark energy studies, solar system science, transient detection, and galactic structure. The paper's value lies in its comprehensive mapping of science requirements to engineering targets and quantitative performance predictions, serving as a key planning document for the project.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The assertion that the LSST system can image about 10,000 square degrees of sky in a single filter in three nights is central to the survey strategy but is stated without reference to the underlying calculation of visit times, slew times, or efficiency factors; including a brief derivation or table of time budget in the main text would substantiate this claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract mentions 'the project is in the construction phase' but the paper date is 2008; update any timeline references if this is a revised version.
  2. [Abstract] Clarify the distinction between the total survey area of 30,000 deg² and the main deep-wide-fast survey area of 18,000 deg² early in the text for better readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and positive recommendation for minor revision. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] The assertion that the LSST system can image about 10,000 square degrees of sky in a single filter in three nights is central to the survey strategy but is stated without reference to the underlying calculation of visit times, slew times, or efficiency factors; including a brief derivation or table of time budget in the main text would substantiate this claim.

    Authors: We agree that a brief time budget would strengthen the presentation of this key performance metric. Although the observing sequence, exposure times, and overall survey efficiency are described in the body of the manuscript, we will add a concise derivation or summary table in the revised main text (near the description of the standard observing sequence) that accounts for the 15 s exposure pairs, slew and settle times, camera readout overhead, and net efficiency. This addition will directly support the stated capability of covering approximately 10,000 square degrees in three nights per filter. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; design parameters follow from external requirements

full rationale

The paper is a 2008 reference design document that consolidates independent science drivers (dark energy, Solar System inventory, transients, Milky Way mapping) and technical constraints (8.4 m aperture, 9.6 deg² FOV, 15 s exposures, Cerro Pachón site) into concrete survey specifications. Quantities such as 10,000 deg² coverage in three nights, single-visit 5σ depth ~24.5 in r, and coadded depth r~27.5 are direct arithmetic consequences of those stated inputs plus operational efficiency assumptions; they are not fitted to or defined in terms of the survey's own future data products. No equations, self-citations, or ansatzes create definitional loops or rename known results as novel derivations. The chain is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The design rests on standard assumptions about telescope performance and site quality drawn from prior engineering studies; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • Number of summed visits
    Design choice of approximately 800 visits across bands to meet depth and time-domain requirements for the main science themes.
  • Coadded depth target
    Target of r~27.5 set by science requirements for faint-object detection rather than derived from first principles.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The 8.4 m primary mirror and 3.2 gigapixel camera will achieve the stated single-visit depth and image quality under Cerro Pachon conditions.
    Invoked when stating the 5-sigma depth of ~24.5 in r and overall survey performance.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 7229 in / 1259 out tokens · 63698 ms · 2026-05-17T08:58:01.567908+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 17 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Measuring cosmic bulk flow with kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich velocity reconstruction

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich reconstruction from WISExSuperCOSMOS and unWISE galaxies with Planck data yields tight upper limits on bulk velocities consistent with LambdaCDM out to 2000 h^{-1} Mpc while showing tension ...

  2. Unveiling $f(R)$ Gravity with Void-Galaxy Cross-Correlation Multipoles

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Void-galaxy cross-correlation multipoles exhibit amplified size-dependent deviations from LCDM in f(R) gravity due to the scalaron fifth force and nonlinear shell dynamics, providing a new probe for modified gravity.

  3. Constraints on Halo Gas Profiles from Joint kSZ and Galaxy Clustering Analysis of ACT DR6 and CMASS

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Joint kSZ-clustering analysis of ACT DR6 and CMASS yields a halo optical depth profile more extended than Websky simulations, suggesting stronger baryonic feedback.

  4. From Big Bang Nucleosynthesis to Late-Time Acceleration in $f(Q,L_m)$ Gravity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The f(Q, L_m) gravity model fits observational data from BBN to late-time acceleration, acting as a viable quintessence-like alternative to the standard LambdaCDM model.

  5. A unified harmonic framework for dark siren cosmology

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The GW-galaxy cross-correlation method, unified with spectral sirens in a harmonic framework, can measure H0 to 1% and Omega_m to 5% precision with 2 years of data from next-generation detectors like Einstein Telescop...

  6. Evidence for deviation in gravitational light deflection from general relativity at cosmological scales with KiDS-Legacy and CMB lensing

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    KiDS-Legacy weak lensing plus CMB data yields a 3 sigma deviation in light deflection from GR in a Lambda CDM background, with the signal driven by large-scale CMB lensing amplitudes.

  7. MESA Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST). I: Solar-Scaled Models

    astro-ph.SR 2016-04 accept novelty 6.0

    MIST provides a new publicly available grid of solar-scaled stellar isochrones and evolutionary tracks computed self-consistently with MESA from pre-main sequence through advanced stages for masses 0.1-300 solar masse...

  8. Taming Additive Systematics via Redshift-Bin-Optimized Star-Galaxy Separation

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Redshift-bin-optimized color cuts using unWISE photometry reduce stellar contamination in the DES Y3 MagLim lens sample by 1.3-5.5% varying across bins and footprint.

  9. Exploring Cosmic Evolution in R\'enyi Entropic Cosmology with Constraints from DESI DR2 BAO and GW Data

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Rényi entropic corrections to cosmology are constrained by DESI DR2 BAO and GW data to a viable quintessence-like model that approaches ΛCDM without phantom behavior and satisfies BBN bounds.

  10. Disentangling cosmic distance tensions with early and late dark energy

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Early dark energy resolves CMB-BAO tension and, combined with thawing quintessence, reduces overall cosmological tensions without phantom crossing.

  11. From Large Telescopes to the MUltiplexed Survey Telescope (MUST)

    astro-ph.IM 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    MUST is a new 6.5 m telescope designed to deliver simultaneous optical spectra for over 20,000 targets across a 5 deg² field, enabling the largest 3D spectroscopic map of the Universe with redshifts for more than 100 ...

  12. Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking and the Vacuum Displacement Principle: From Galactic Scales to Cosmic Fine-Tuning

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A vacuum scalar field with spontaneous symmetry breaking and matter coupling generates Yukawa-corrected gravity that accounts for flat galactic rotation curves and dynamically tracks the cosmological constant.

  13. The Recurrent Nova Population in M31

    astro-ph.SR 2026-04 accept novelty 4.0

    M31 hosts at least 20 recurrent novae with 79 total eruptions; half recur faster than the shortest Galactic example, while light-curve and spatial properties match the Milky Way population.

  14. Not too close! Evaluating the impact of the baseline on the localization of binary black holes by next-generation gravitational-wave detectors

    gr-qc 2026-04 conditional novelty 4.0

    Baselines of 8-11 ms light travel time for two CE detectors provide a reasonable compromise for BBH sky localization, with third detectors eliminating multimodality for most or all events.

  15. Cosmic Shear constraints from HSC Year 3 with clustering calibration of the tomographic redshift distributions from DESI

    astro-ph.CO 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Reanalysis of HSC Y3 cosmic shear with DESI clustering redshift calibration yields S8 = 0.805 ± 0.018, a 1.8× error reduction and upward shift toward Planck cosmology.

  16. Machine Learning Techniques for Astrophysics and Cosmology: Photometric Redshifts

    astro-ph.IM 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    AI techniques for photometric redshift estimation have converged and are now limited by the size, systematics, and selection effects in spectroscopic training samples rather than by methodology.

  17. Machine Learning for Multi-messenger Probes of New Physics and Cosmology: A Review and Perspective

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A review summarizing machine learning methods for multi-messenger probes of dark matter and new physics, with a proposed plan for future integrated analyses.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 300 canonical work pages · cited by 17 Pith papers · 22 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    N., Adelman-McCarthy , J

    Abazajian , K. N., Adelman-McCarthy , J. K., Ag \"u eros , M. A., et al. 2009, , 182, 543, 10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543

  2. [2]

    CMB-S4 Science Book, First Edition

    Abazajian , K. N., Adshead , P., Ahmed , Z., et al. 2016, ArXiv e-prints. 1610.02743

  3. [3]

    P., Abbott , R., Abbott , T

    Abbott , B. P., Abbott , R., Abbott , T. D., et al. 2017 a , , 848, L12, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9

  4. [4]

    2017 b , , 551, 85, 10.1038/nature24471

    ---. 2017 b , , 551, 85, 10.1038/nature24471

  5. [5]

    A'Hearn , M. F. 2004, in Comets II, ed. M. C. Festou , H. U. Keller , & H. A. Weaver (University of Arizona Press), 17--22

  6. [6]

    F., Millis , R

    A'Hearn , M. F., Millis , R. C., Schleicher , D. O., Osip , D. J., & Birch , P. V. 1995, , 118, 223, 10.1006/icar.1995.1190

  7. [7]

    2018, , 70, S4, 10.1093/pasj/psx066

    Aihara , H., Arimoto , N., Armstrong , R., et al. 2018, , 70, S4, 10.1093/pasj/psx066

  8. [8]

    Report of the Dark Energy Task Force

    Albrecht , A., Bernstein , G., Cahn , R., et al. 2006, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints. astro-ph/0609591

  9. [9]

    A., Alves , D

    Alcock , C., Allsman , R. A., Alves , D. R., et al. 2000, , 542, 281, 10.1086/309512

  10. [10]

    2001, , 550, L169, 10.1086/319636

    ---. 2001, , 550, L169, 10.1086/319636

  11. [11]

    B., & L \'e pine , J

    Am \^o res , E. B., & L \'e pine , J. R. D. 2005, , 130, 659, 10.1086/430957

  12. [12]

    A., Clem , J

    An , D., Johnson , J. A., Clem , J. L., et al. 2008, , 179, 326, 10.1086/592090

  13. [13]

    C., Johnson , J

    An , D., Beers , T. C., Johnson , J. A., et al. 2013, , 763, 65, 10.1088/0004-637X/763/1/65

  14. [14]

    P., Berk , A., Acharya , P

    Anderson , G. P., Berk , A., Acharya , P. K., et al. 1999, in , Vol. 3866, Optics in Atmospheric Propagation and Adaptive Systems III, ed. A. Kohnle & J. D. Gonglewski , 2--10

  15. [15]

    F., Haggard , D., Homer , L., et al

    Anderson , S. F., Haggard , D., Homer , L., et al. 2005, , 130, 2230, 10.1086/491587

  16. [16]

    2000, in ASP Conf.\ Ser., Vol

    Angel , R., Lesser , M., Sarlot , R., & Dunham , E. 2000, in ASP Conf.\ Ser., Vol. 195, Imaging the Universe in Three Dimensions, ed. W. van Breugel & J. Bland-Hawthorn , 81

  17. [17]

    Z., Xin , B., Claver , C., et al

    Angeli , G. Z., Xin , B., Claver , C., et al. 2016, in , Vol. 9911, Modeling, Systems Engineering, and Project Management for Astronomy VI, 991118

  18. [18]

    2017, Journal of Instrumentation, 12, C03017

    Antilogus, P., Bailly, P., Barrillon, P., et al. 2017, Journal of Instrumentation, 12, C03017

  19. [19]

    2010, , 12, 012, 10.1088/1475-7516/2010/12/012

    Antoniou , I., & Perivolaropoulos , L. 2010, , 12, 012, 10.1088/1475-7516/2010/12/012

  20. [20]

    2016, in , Vol

    Araujo-Hauck , C., Sebag , J., Liang , M., et al. 2016, in , Vol. 9906, Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes VI, 99060L

  21. [21]

    A., Kasen , D., et al

    Arcavi , I., Howell , D. A., Kasen , D., et al. 2017, , 551, 210, 10.1038/nature24030

  22. [22]

    D., & Meakin , C

    Arnett , W. D., & Meakin , C. 2011, , 741, 33, 10.1088/0004-637X/741/1/33

  23. [23]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

  24. [24]

    B., Abdo , A

    Atwood , W. B., Abdo , A. A., Ackermann , M., et al. 2009, , 697, 1071, 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1071

  25. [25]

    2017, Minor Planet Electronic Circulars, 2017-U181

    Bacci , P., Maestripieri , M., Tesi , L., et al. 2017, Minor Planet Electronic Circulars, 2017-U181

  26. [26]

    2008, , 78, 043528, 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.043528

    Barnard , M., Abrahamse , A., Albrecht , A., Bozek , B., & Yashar , M. 2008, , 78, 043528, 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.043528

  27. [27]

    M., Jenkins , A., & Pearce , F

    Bartelmann , M., Huss , A., Colberg , J. M., Jenkins , A., & Pearce , F. R. 1998, , 330, 1

  28. [28]

    2014, , 780, 54, 10.1088/0004-637X/780/1/54

    Batista , V., Beaulieu , J.-P., Gould , A., et al. 2014, , 780, 54, 10.1088/0004-637X/780/1/54

  29. [29]

    Batygin , K., & Brown , M. E. 2016, , 151, 22, 10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/22

  30. [30]

    Bayliss , D. D. R., & Sackett , P. D. 2011, , 743, 103, 10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/103

  31. [31]

    P., Fouqu \'e , P., et al

    Beaulieu , J.-P., Bennett , D. P., Fouqu \'e , P., et al. 2006, , 439, 437, 10.1038/nature04441

  32. [32]

    C., Wittman , D

    Becker , A. C., Wittman , D. M., Boeshaar , P. C., et al. 2004, , 611, 418, 10.1086/421994

  33. [33]

    H., White , R

    Becker , R. H., White , R. L., & Helfand , D. J. 1995, , 450, 559, 10.1086/176166

  34. [34]

    Becla , J., & Wang , D. L. 2014, in Exascale Radio Astronomy, Vol. 2

  35. [35]

    2017, LSST Data Management Database Design , LSST Document LDM-135, LSST

    Becla , J., Wang , D., Monkewitz , S., et al. 2017, LSST Data Management Database Design , LSST Document LDM-135, LSST. https://ls.st/LDM-135

  36. [36]

    F., Zucker , D

    Bell , E. F., Zucker , D. B., Belokurov , V., et al. 2008, , 680, 295, 10.1086/588032

  37. [37]

    2014, in The Third Hot-wiring the Transient Universe Workshop, ed

    Bellm , E. 2014, in The Third Hot-wiring the Transient Universe Workshop, ed. P. R. Wozniak , M. J. Graham , A. A. Mahabal , & R. Seaman , 27--33

  38. [38]

    Belokurov , V., & Koposov , S. E. 2016, , 456, 602, 10.1093/mnras/stv2688

  39. [39]

    B., Evans , N

    Belokurov , V., Zucker , D. B., Evans , N. W., et al. 2007 a , , 654, 897, 10.1086/509718

  40. [40]

    W., Moiseev , A., et al

    Belokurov , V., Evans , N. W., Moiseev , A., et al. 2007 b , , 671, L9, 10.1086/524948

  41. [41]

    E., Evans , N

    Belokurov , V., Koposov , S. E., Evans , N. W., et al. 2014, , 437, 116, 10.1093/mnras/stt1862

  42. [42]

    A., Ade , P

    Benson , B. A., Ade , P. A. R., Ahmed , Z., et al. 2014, in , Vol. 9153, Millimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy VII, 91531P

  43. [43]

    1995, , 107, 1047, 10.1086/133661

    Bergeron , P., Wesemael , F., & Beauchamp , A. 1995, , 107, 1047, 10.1086/133661

  44. [44]

    M., Trilling , D

    Bernstein , G. M., Trilling , D. E., Allen , R. L., et al. 2004, , 128, 1364, 10.1086/422919

  45. [45]

    M., Armstrong , R., Plazas , A

    Bernstein , G. M., Armstrong , R., Plazas , A. A., et al. 2017, , 129, 074503, 10.1088/1538-3873/aa6c55

  46. [46]

    2012, , 757, 166, 10.1088/0004-637X/757/2/166

    Berry , M., Ivezi \'c , Z ., Sesar , B., et al. 2012, , 757, 166, 10.1088/0004-637X/757/2/166

  47. [47]

    A., & Zentner , A

    Bhattacharya , S., Kosowsky , A., Newman , J. A., & Zentner , A. R. 2011, , 83, 043004, 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.043004

  48. [48]

    B., Modjaz , M., Hicken , M., et al

    Bianco , F. B., Modjaz , M., Hicken , M., et al. 2014, , 213, 19, 10.1088/0067-0049/213/2/19

  49. [49]

    2003, , 594, 665, 10.1086/376983

    Blake , C., & Glazebrook , K. 2003, , 594, 665, 10.1086/376983

  50. [50]

    D., & LSST Strong Lensing Science Collaboration

    Blandford , R. D., & LSST Strong Lensing Science Collaboration . 2007, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 39, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 979

  51. [51]

    S., Starr , D

    Bloom , J. S., Starr , D. L., Butler , N. R., et al. 2008, Astronomische Nachrichten, 329, 284, 10.1002/asna.200710957

  52. [52]

    S., Giannios , D., Metzger , B

    Bloom , J. S., Giannios , D., Metzger , B. D., et al. 2011, Science, 333, 203, 10.1126/science.1207150

  53. [53]

    J., Savcheva , A., West , A

    Bochanski , J. J., Savcheva , A., West , A. A., & Hawley , S. L. 2013, , 145, 40, 10.1088/0004-6256/145/2/40

  54. [54]

    J., West , A

    Bochanski , J. J., West , A. A., Hawley , S. L., & Covey , K. R. 2007, , 133, 531, 10.1086/510240

  55. [55]

    J., Willman , B., West , A

    Bochanski , J. J., Willman , B., West , A. A., Strader , J., & Chomiuk , L. 2014, , 147, 76, 10.1088/0004-6256/147/4/76

  56. [56]

    2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 375, 20160252, 10.1098/rsta.2016.0252

    Bockel \'e e-Morvan , D., & Biver , N. 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 375, 20160252, 10.1098/rsta.2016.0252

  57. [57]

    A., Ivezi \'c , Z ., Sesar , B., et al

    Bond , N. A., Ivezi \'c , Z ., Sesar , B., et al. 2010, , 716, 1, 10.1088/0004-637X/716/1/1

  58. [58]

    2007, , 472, 443, 10.1051/0004-6361:20077611

    Bongiorno , A., Zamorani , G., Gavignaud , I., et al. 2007, , 472, 443, 10.1051/0004-6361:20077611

  59. [59]

    H., et al

    Bonvin , V., Courbin , F., Suyu , S. H., et al. 2017, , 465, 4914, 10.1093/mnras/stw3006

  60. [60]

    2018, , 70, S5, 10.1093/pasj/psx080

    Bosch , J., Armstrong , R., Bickerton , S., et al. 2018, , 70, S5, 10.1093/pasj/psx080

  61. [61]

    F., Vokrouhlick \'y , D., Broz , M., Nesvorn \'y , D., & Morbidelli , A

    Bottke , W. F., Vokrouhlick \'y , D., Broz , M., Nesvorn \'y , D., & Morbidelli , A. 2001, Science, 294, 1693, 10.1126/science.1066760

  62. [62]

    2007, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol

    Brandt , N., & LSST Active Galaxies Science Collaboration . 2007, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 39, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 980

  63. [63]

    Communication over an Arbitrarily Varying Channel under a State-Myopic Encoder

    Brandt , W. N., & Hasinger , G. 2005, , 43, 827, 10.1146/annurev.astro.43.051804.102213

  64. [64]

    N., & Vito , F

    Brandt , W. N., & Vito , F. 2017, Astronomische Nachrichten, 338, 241, 10.1002/asna.201713337

  65. [65]

    2005, , 129, 907, 10.1086/426911

    Brice \ n o , C., Calvet , N., Hern \'a ndez , J., et al. 2005, , 129, 907, 10.1086/426911

  66. [66]

    Brown , M. E. 2017, , 154, 65, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa79f4

  67. [67]

    E., & Batygin , K

    Brown , M. E., & Batygin , K. 2016, , 824, L23, 10.3847/2041-8205/824/2/L23

  68. [68]

    E., Trujillo , C., & Rabinowitz , D

    Brown , M. E., Trujillo , C., & Rabinowitz , D. 2004, , 617, 645, 10.1086/422095

  69. [69]

    2003, , 344, 1000, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x

    Bruzual , G., & Charlot , S. 2003, , 344, 1000, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x

  70. [70]

    J., Szalay , A

    Budav \'a ri , T., Connolly , A. J., Szalay , A. S., et al. 2003, , 595, 59, 10.1086/377168

  71. [71]

    S., & Johnston , K

    Bullock , J. S., & Johnston , K. V. 2005, , 635, 931, 10.1086/497422

  72. [72]

    L., Axelrod , T., Blondin , S., et al

    Burke , D. L., Axelrod , T., Blondin , S., et al. 2010, , 720, 811, 10.1088/0004-637X/720/1/811

  73. [73]

    L., Rykoff , E

    Burke , D. L., Rykoff , E. S., Allam , S., et al. 2018, , 155, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa9f22

  74. [74]

    2006, , 640, 1063, 10.1086/500293

    Burrows , A., Sudarsky , D., & Hubeny , I. 2006, , 640, 1063, 10.1086/500293

  75. [75]

    2013, , 87, 123522, 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.123522

    Cai , R.-G., Ma , Y.-Z., Tang , B., & Tuo , Z.-L. 2013, , 87, 123522, 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.123522

  76. [76]

    L., & Marrone , A

    Campanelli , L., Cea , P., Fogli , G. L., & Marrone , A. 2011, , 83, 103503, 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.103503

  77. [77]

    C., Lee , Y

    Carollo , D., Beers , T. C., Lee , Y. S., et al. 2007, , 450, 1020, 10.1038/nature06460

  78. [78]

    I., Girard , T

    Casetti-Dinescu , D. I., Girard , T. M., Herrera , D., et al. 2007, , 134, 195, 10.1086/518507

  79. [79]

    The Pan-STARRS1 Surveys

    Chambers , K. C., Magnier , E. A., Metcalfe , N., et al. 2016, ArXiv e-prints. 1612.05560

  80. [80]

    2013, , 434, 2121, 10.1093/mnras/stt1156

    Chang , C., Jarvis , M., Jain , B., et al. 2013, , 434, 2121, 10.1093/mnras/stt1156

Showing first 80 references.