Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 66 references

Near the Kerr inner horizon a non-minimally coupled quantum scalar field in the Unruh state reaches a finite value of ⟨Φ̂²⟩_ren through per-mode ringdown at twice the classical quasinormal frequencies followed by an r_*^{-2ℓ-3} tail.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-29 03:52 UTC pith:XRHNL7U7

load-bearing objection The paper extends prior minimal-coupling results to general ξ and reports doubled-QNM ringdown plus r_*^{-2ℓ-3} tails for <Φ²>_ren near the Kerr inner horizon, but lacks visible checks on subtraction artifacts. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.27859 v1 pith:XRHNL7U7 submitted 2026-06-26 gr-qc hep-th

Quantum fluxes and langlehat{Φ}²rangle for a non-minimally coupled scalar field: ringdown and tail on approaching the polar Kerr inner horizon

Maria Alberti , Noa Zilberman , Marc Casals , Adrian C. Ottewill This is my paper
classification gr-qc hep-th
keywords Kerr black holeinner horizonquantum scalar fieldUnruh statequasinormal modesrenormalizationenergy fluxtortoise coordinate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes the renormalized expectation value ⟨Φ̂²⟩_ren and the associated energy fluxes for a massless real scalar field with arbitrary curvature coupling ξ near the inner horizon of a Kerr black hole, along the rotation axis, in the Unruh state. State subtraction is used to renormalize the quantities, allowing the calculation to reach deeper into the near-inner-horizon region than previous work and to expose the final asymptotic approach. For ⟨Φ̂²⟩_ren, which turns out to be independent of ξ, each angular mode ℓ approaches its finite inner-horizon value first via exponentially damped oscillations whose frequencies numerically match twice the known classical quasinormal-mode frequencies, then via an inverse-power tail proportional to r_*^{-2ℓ-3} in the tortoise coordinate. A reader would care because these quantities describe the quantum stress-energy that could influence the interior geometry of an evaporating rotating black hole.

Core claim

The central claim is that ⟨Φ̂²⟩_ren approaches its finite asymptotic value at the inner horizon with a per-ℓ-mode structure consisting of a ringdown phase of exponentially damped oscillations whose complex frequencies match twice the classical Kerr quasinormal-mode frequencies, followed by an inverse-power tail behaving as r_*^{-2ℓ-3} (where r_* diverges at the inner horizon). The associated renormalized fluxes ⟨T_uu⟩_ren and ⟨T_vv⟩_ren are obtained consistently with the same method for general ξ.

What carries the argument

State-subtraction renormalization of the mode-summed operators for the field and its stress-energy tensor, followed by asymptotic analysis of the ℓ-modes in the tortoise coordinate r_* that diverges at the inner horizon.

Load-bearing premise

The state-subtraction renormalization procedure remains valid and free of artifacts when applied along the axis deep into the near-inner-horizon region.

What would settle it

A numerical extraction of the complex frequencies dominating the ringdown phase that fails to coincide with twice the known classical Kerr quasinormal-mode frequencies would falsify the reported match.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The energy fluxes ⟨T_uu⟩_ren and ⟨T_vv⟩_ren remain finite at the inner horizon for any curvature coupling ξ.
  • The inverse-power tails match the functional form of Price's law upon the replacement t → r_*.
  • The doubling of the quasinormal frequencies holds in the regime where ringing dominates the approach to the inner-horizon value.
  • The results generalize the minimal-coupling case by showing that ⟨Φ̂²⟩_ren itself is independent of ξ.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same ringdown-plus-tail structure appears for off-axis observers, the quantum back-reaction near the inner horizon could be largely determined by these on-axis results.
  • The frequency doubling may indicate that ⟨Φ̂²⟩_ren behaves like a bilinear operator constructed from the classical field modes.
  • Analogous calculations in other spacetimes with Cauchy horizons could test whether the r_*^{-2ℓ-3} tail is universal.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes the renormalized expectation value ⟨Φ̂²⟩_ren together with the renormalized energy fluxes ⟨T̂_uu⟩_ren and ⟨T̂_vv⟩_ren for a massless real scalar field with arbitrary curvature coupling ξ, placed in the Unruh state, near the inner horizon of Kerr along the rotation axis. Renormalization is performed via state subtraction; the central result is that ⟨Φ̂²⟩_ren (which is ξ-independent) approaches a finite asymptotic value through a per-ℓ ringdown phase of exponentially damped oscillations whose frequencies numerically match twice the classical Kerr QNMs, followed by inverse-power tails ∼ r_*^{-2ℓ-3}.

Significance. If the reported asymptotic behaviors are robust, the work supplies concrete information on the near-Cauchy-horizon quantum stress-energy in an evaporating rotating black hole and extends the minimal-coupling results of the cited earlier papers. The numerical observation that the quantum ringdown frequencies are twice the classical QNMs is potentially significant for understanding mode coupling across the horizon.

major comments (2)
  1. [Renormalization procedure (method section)] The state-subtraction renormalization procedure is applied deep into the near-IH region where r_* diverges, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit validation (cutoff independence, comparison with point-splitting, or residual estimates) that subtraction artifacts remain under control in this regime. This directly affects the reliability of the claimed ringdown and tail behaviors.
  2. [Numerical results and frequency-matching analysis] The numerical claim that the ringing frequencies match twice the classical QNMs, together with the extraction of the precise power-law exponents, is presented without any description of the mode-sum implementation, fitting procedure, convergence tests with respect to ℓ_max or radial cutoff, or error estimates. These omissions make the central numerical findings impossible to assess.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. The points raised concern the validation of our renormalization procedure and the documentation of our numerical methods. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Renormalization procedure (method section)] The state-subtraction renormalization procedure is applied deep into the near-IH region where r_* diverges, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit validation (cutoff independence, comparison with point-splitting, or residual estimates) that subtraction artifacts remain under control in this regime. This directly affects the reliability of the claimed ringdown and tail behaviors.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from explicit validation of the state-subtraction procedure in the deep near-IH regime. Although the method builds on prior validations in less extreme regions (as referenced in the cited works), additional checks specific to this regime are warranted. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection in the methods section presenting cutoff-independence tests, comparisons with point-splitting results where accessible, and residual estimates to confirm control of subtraction artifacts. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical results and frequency-matching analysis] The numerical claim that the ringing frequencies match twice the classical QNMs, together with the extraction of the precise power-law exponents, is presented without any description of the mode-sum implementation, fitting procedure, convergence tests with respect to ℓ_max or radial cutoff, or error estimates. These omissions make the central numerical findings impossible to assess.

    Authors: We concur that the absence of implementation details hinders assessment of the numerical results. The current text emphasizes the physical outcomes but does not include the required technical description. In the revision we will expand the numerical-results section to document the mode-sum implementation, the fitting procedures used to extract frequencies and power-law exponents, convergence tests with respect to ℓ_max and radial cutoff, and associated error estimates. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; direct numerical mode-sum computation

full rationale

The paper computes ⟨Φ̂²⟩_ren and fluxes via explicit mode-sum plus state-subtraction renormalization along the axis, generalizing prior computations (arXiv:2203.08502, arXiv:2409.17464) but presenting the ringdown frequencies (numerically matching 2× classical QNMs) and r_*^{-2ℓ-3} tails as direct numerical observations in the tortoise coordinate. No equation reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, no ansatz is smuggled via self-citation, and the central results remain externally falsifiable through the reported numerical match and power-law exponents. Self-citations support method continuity but are not load-bearing for the new asymptotic behaviors.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; no free parameters, invented entities, or non-standard axioms are mentioned. Relies on standard assumptions of QFT in curved spacetime and the validity of state subtraction.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Quantum field theory in curved spacetime is well-defined for the Unruh state on Kerr background.
    Standard assumption invoked for the state choice.
  • domain assumption State-subtraction method removes divergences correctly near the inner horizon.
    Method used for renormalization of ⟨Φ̂²⟩ and fluxes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5956 in / 1452 out tokens · 72278 ms · 2026-06-29T03:52:23.689308+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We compute $\langle\hat{\Phi}^{2}\rangle_\text{ren}$ as well as the energy fluxes $\langle \hat{T}_{uu}\rangle_\text{ren}$ and $\langle \hat{T}_{vv}\rangle_\text{ren}$ (where $u$ and $v$ are the standard Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates) associated with a quantum massless real scalar field $\hat{\Phi}$, with a general curvature coupling constant $\xi$, near the inner horizon (IH) of a Kerr black hole, along the axis of rotation. The quantum field is in the Unruh state, corresponding to an evaporating black hole. We renormalize these quantities by the state-subtraction method. We drop the assumption of minimal coupling to the curvature, thereby generalizing the results of arXiv:2203.08502 for the fluxes at the IH. This requires understanding the asymptotic behavior of $\langle\hat{\Phi}^{2}\rangle_\text{ren}$ neat the IH. State subtraction allows us to push the computation of $\langle\hat{\Phi}^{2}\rangle_\text{ren}$ along the axis of rotation in the Kerr interior in arXiv:2409.17464 deeper into the near-IH region, exposing their final asymptotic behavior on approaching the IH. For $\langle\hat{\Phi}^{2}\rangle_\text{ren}$ (a $\xi$-independent quantity in the Kerr case), we find that the approach to its finite asymptotic IH value is given, per $\ell$-mode, by a ringdown phase (namely exponentially damped oscillations), followed by an inverse-power tail, both in the tortoise coordinate $r_{*}$ (which diverges at the IH). Interestingly, in the regime where the ringing dominates, the ringing's complex frequencies are (numerically) found to match twice the well-known classical quasinormal-mode frequencies in Kerr, and the inverse-power tails are found to be $r_{*}^{-2\ell-3}$ (resembling Price's law in the classical black hole exterior, upon replacement $t\to r_*$). [Abridged]

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.27859 by Adrian C. Ottewill, Marc Casals, Maria Alberti, Noa Zilberman.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Partial Penrose diagram for the subextremal Kerr BH. Region I denotes the exterior region (where [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Near-IH individual [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Individual [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Zoomed-in view of the ringdown phase in the individual [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Comparison between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Further features of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Scattering problem of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Numerical results (blue points) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_9.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Region III The scattering problem in region III (extending tor→ −∞) is mathematically well-posed, as the effective potential (2.8b) remains well behaved in the limitr→0(indeed, it approaches a constant and can be extended smoothly to negativervalues). The presence of a singularity and closed timelike curves (and, consequently, the absence of well- defined...

  2. [2]

    For this purpose, we will first define the Eddington- type modes in region II:leftmodesf L ωℓm emerging fromCH L, andrightmodesf R ωℓm emerging fromCH R, as depicted in Fig

    Region II We now consider the HTPF (A4) in the case thatx, x′ are in region II, aiming at an expression in terms of the Eddington-type modes which are computationally advantageous. For this purpose, we will first define the Eddington- type modes in region II:leftmodesf L ωℓm emerging fromCH L, andrightmodesf R ωℓm emerging fromCH R, as depicted in Fig. 8....

  3. [3]

    Computation ofρ up ωℓ0,A ωℓ0,B ωℓ0,ρ down ωℓ0 andS ω ℓ0 The numerical ingredients necessary to evaluate the mode-sum (3.2)-(3.3) at the pole(θ= 0)are the exterior scattering reflection coefficientρup ωℓ0, the interior scattering coefficientsAωℓ0,B ωℓ0, the spheroidal harmonicsSω ℓ0 and the reflection scattering coefficient associated with the comparison|U...

  4. [4]

    1 in Ref

    We obtained all ingredients, with the exception ofρdown ωℓ0, as detailed in Appendix C, Sec. 1 in Ref. [2]. The|U⟩reflection coefficientρ down ωℓ0 was obtained by numerically solving the related radial equation in Mathematica [41], within a precision of10−17 forℓ= 0 andℓ= 1, and10 −20 forℓ= 2. Higher precision is required for largerℓin order to resolve th...

  5. [5]

    (3.8) and (3.6), has an integrand function which oscillates likeexp(2iωr∗)

    Strongly-oscillating integrand The mode-sum expression for⟨Φ 2⟩U−U in the (polar) IH vicinity, given through Eqs. (3.8) and (3.6), has an integrand function which oscillates likeexp(2iωr∗). At larger ∗ (corresponding to the close vicinity of the IH) the integrand hence oscillates very rapidly (the wavelength of the oscillations inωbeing∼r−1 ∗ ). In order ...

  6. [6]

    (116) in [58] after placing an absolute value around (−x), and Eq

    Ingoing radial solution The first solution to the general-spin radial Teukolsky equation that we consider is readily defined in the interior and the exterior of the black hole and is that given by (see Eq. (116) in [58] after placing an absolute value around (−x), and Eq. (A8) in [59]) Rin ℓm =e iϵκx| −x| −s−iϵ+(1−x) iϵ− pν in(x),(D9) pν in ≡ ∞X n=−∞ anpn...

  7. [7]

    Upgoing radial solution The second solution to the general-spin radial Teukolsky equation that we consider is only introduced in the exterior of the black hole and so is contained in Ref. [58]. Its MST series representation is given in Eqs. (159) and (153) in [58] and it satisfies the boundary conditions Rup ℓm(r, ω)∼    C ref∆−se−iωrST ∗ +C inceiωrS...

  8. [8]

    Zilberman, M

    N. Zilberman, M. Casals, A. Ori, and A. C. Ottewill, Quantum Fluxes at the Inner Horizon of a Spinning Black Hole, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 261102 (2022)

    2022

  9. [9]

    Zilberman, M

    N. Zilberman, M. Casals, A. Levi, A. Ori, and A. C. Ottewill, Computation of⟨Φ2⟩and quantum fluxes at the polar interior of a spinning black hole, Phys. Rev. D111, 124054 (2025)

    2025

  10. [10]

    Ori, Evolution of scalar field perturbations inside a Kerr black hole, Phys

    A. Ori, Evolution of scalar field perturbations inside a Kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. D58, 084016 (1998)

    1998

  11. [11]

    R. M. Wald,Quantum field theory in curved spacetime and black hole thermodynamics(University of Chicago press, 1994)

    1994

  12. [12]

    R. M. Wald, Trace anomaly of a conformally invariant quantum field in curved spacetime, Phys. Rev. D17, 1477 (1978)

    1978

  13. [13]

    Hawking, Particle creation by black holes, Commun

    S. Hawking, Particle creation by black holes, Commun. Math. Phys.43, 199 (1975)

    1975

  14. [14]

    W. G. Unruh, Notes on black-hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. D14, 870 (1976)

    1976

  15. [15]

    F. J. Tipler, Singularities in conformally flat spacetimes, Phys. Lett. A64, 8 (1977)

    1977

  16. [16]

    Ori, Strength of curvature singularities, Phys

    A. Ori, Strength of curvature singularities, Phys. Rev. D61, 064016 (2000)

    2000

  17. [17]

    Ori, Structure of the singularity inside a realistic rotating black hole, Phys

    A. Ori, Structure of the singularity inside a realistic rotating black hole, Phys. Rev. Lett.68, 2117 (1992)

    1992

  18. [18]

    The interior of dynamical vacuum black holes I: TheC 0-stability of the Kerr Cauchy horizon.Preprint, arXiv:1710.01722,

    M. Dafermos and J. Luk, The interior of dynamical vacuum black holes I: TheC0-stability of the Kerr Cauchy horizon, arXiv:1710.01722 (2017)

    work page arXiv 2017

  19. [19]

    Gurriaran, Non-linear instability of the Kerr Cauchy horizon neari+, arXiv:2603.17911 (2026)

    S. Gurriaran, Non-linear instability of the Kerr Cauchy horizon neari+, arXiv:2603.17911 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  20. [20]

    The formation of a weak null singularity in the interior of generic rotating black holes

    J. Lukand S.-J.Oh,Theformationofa weaknullsingularityin theinteriorofgeneric rotatingblack holes,arXiv:2604.04877 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    Lanir, A

    A. Lanir, A. Ori, N. Zilberman, O. Sela, A. Maline, and A. Levi, Analysis of quantum effects inside spherical charged black holes, Phys. Rev. D99, 061502 (2019)

    2019

  22. [22]

    Zilberman, A

    N. Zilberman, A. Levi, and A. Ori, Quantum fluxes at the inner horizon of a spherical charged black hole, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 171302 (2020). 31

    2020

  23. [23]

    Hollands, C

    S. Hollands, C. Klein, and J. Zahn, Quantum stress tensor at the Cauchy horizon of the Reissner–Nordström–de Sitter spacetime, Phys. Rev. D102, 085004 (2020)

    2020

  24. [24]

    Klein, M

    C. Klein, M. Soltani, M. Casals, and S. Hollands, Infinite quantum twisting at the Cauchy horizon of rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 121501 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    Klein, J

    C. Klein, J. Zahn, and S. Hollands, Quantum (Dis)Charge of Black Hole Interiors, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 231301 (2021)

    2021

  26. [26]

    Alberti and J

    M. Alberti and J. Zahn, Quantum effects in near-extremal charged black hole spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D111, 104061 (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    Klein and J

    C. Klein and J. Zahn, Renormalized charged scalar current in the Reissner-Nordström-de Sitter spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 104, 025009 (2021)

    2021

  28. [28]

    McMaken, Backreaction from quantum fluxes at the Kerr inner horizon, Phys

    T. McMaken, Backreaction from quantum fluxes at the Kerr inner horizon, Phys. Rev. D110, 045019 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    W. A. Hiscock, Stress Energy Tensor Near a Charged, Rotating, Evaporating Black Hole, Phys. Rev. D15, 3054 (1977)

    1977

  30. [30]

    Birrell and P

    N. Birrell and P. Davies, On falling through a black hole into another universe, Nature272, 35 (1978)

    1978

  31. [31]

    W. A. Hiscock, Quantum-mechanical instability of the Kerr-Newman black-hole interior, Phys. Rev. D21, 2057 (1980)

    2057

  32. [32]

    A. C. Ottewill and E. Winstanley, The renormalized stress tensor in Kerr space-time: General results, Phys. Rev.D62, 084018 (2000)

    2000

  33. [33]

    Arad, Numerical investigation of the interior geometry of semiclassical evaporating spherical charged black holes (2025)

    G. Arad, Numerical investigation of the interior geometry of semiclassical evaporating spherical charged black holes (2025)

    2025

  34. [34]

    Zilberman and A

    N. Zilberman and A. Ori, Semiclassical backreaction inside a non-evaporating four-dimensional spherical charged black hole, in preparation

  35. [35]

    Candelas and B

    P. Candelas and B. P. Jensen, The Feynman Green Function Inside a Schwarzschild Black Hole, Phys. Rev. D33, 1596 (1986)

    1986

  36. [36]

    J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking, Path-integral derivation of black-hole radiance, Phys. Rev. D13, 2188 (1976)

    1976

  37. [37]

    B. S. DeWitt, Quantum field theory in curved spacetime, Physics Reports19, 295 (1975)

    1975

  38. [38]

    S. M. Christensen, Vacuum Expectation Value of the Stress Tensor in an Arbitrary Curved Background: The Covariant Point Separation Method, Phys. Rev. D14, 2490 (1976)

    1976

  39. [39]

    Lanir, A

    A. Lanir, A. Levi, and A. Ori, Mode-sum renormalization of⟨Φ2⟩for a quantum scalar field inside a Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Rev. D98, 084017 (2018)

    2018

  40. [40]

    Levi and A

    A. Levi and A. Ori, Pragmatic mode-sum regularization method for semiclassical black-hole spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D91, 104028 (2015)

    2015

  41. [41]

    B. S. Kay and R. M. Wald, Theorems on the uniqueness and thermal properties of stationary, nonsingular, quasifree states on spacetimes with a bifurcate killing horizon, Physics Reports207, 49 (1991)

    1991

  42. [42]

    Häfner and C

    D. Häfner and C. K. M. Klein, The Unruh state for bosonic Teukolsky fields on subextreme Kerr spacetimes, arXiv:2602.09796 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  43. [43]

    R. H. Price, Nonspherical perturbations of relativistic gravitational collapse. 1. Scalar and gravitational perturbations, Phys. Rev.D5, 2419 (1972)

    1972

  44. [44]

    Ori, Evolution of perturbations inside a charged black hole: Linear scalar field, Phys

    A. Ori, Evolution of perturbations inside a charged black hole: Linear scalar field, Phys. Rev.D55, 4860 (1997)

    1997

  45. [45]

    Zilberman, M

    N. Zilberman, M. Casals, A. Ori, and A. C. Ottewill, Two-point function of a quantum scalar field in the interior region of a Kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. D106, 125011 (2022)

    2022

  46. [46]

    S. A. Teukolsky, Rotating black holes: Separable wave equations for gravitational and electromagnetic perturbations, Phys. Rev. Lett.29, 1114 (1972)

    1972

  47. [47]

    Berti, V

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and M. Casals, Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of spin-weighted spheroidal harmonics in four and higher dimensions, Phys. Rev.D73, 024013 (2006)

    2006

  48. [48]

    Wolfram Research, Inc., Mathematica, Version 14.1 (2024)

    2024

  49. [49]

    Iuliano and J

    C. Iuliano and J. Zahn, Canonical quantization of Teukolsky fields on Kerr backgrounds, Phys. Rev. D108, 125017 (2023)

    2023

  50. [50]

    Starobinskii, Amplification of waves during reflection from a rotating black hole, Zh

    A. Starobinskii, Amplification of waves during reflection from a rotating black hole, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz64, 48 (1973)

    1973

  51. [51]

    Y. B. Zeldovich, Generation of Waves by a Rotating Body, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters 14, 180 (1971)

    1971

  52. [52]

    Hollands and R

    S. Hollands and R. M. Wald, Local Wick polynomials and time ordered products of quantum fields in curved space-time, Commun. Math. Phys.223, 289 (2001)

    2001

  53. [53]

    Alberti and A

    M. Alberti and A. Ori, in preparation

  54. [54]

    Alberti and N

    M. Alberti and N. Zilberman, Supplement on the analytical derivation of the leading inverse-power tail, Zenodo (2026), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20808262

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.20808262 2026

  55. [55]

    Berti, Ringdown,https://pages.jh.edu/eberti2/ringdown/

    E. Berti, Ringdown,https://pages.jh.edu/eberti2/ringdown/

  56. [56]

    S. R. Dolan, The Quasinormal Mode Spectrum of a Kerr Black Hole in the Eikonal Limit, Phys. Rev.D82, 104003 (2010)

    2010

  57. [57]

    Casals, C

    M. Casals, C. Kavanagh, and A. C. Ottewill, High-order late-time tail in a Kerr spacetime, Phys. Rev. D94, 124053 (2016)

    2016

  58. [58]

    Levi and A

    A. Levi and A. Ori, Mode-sum regularization of ϕ2 in the angular-splitting method, Phys. Rev. D94, 044054 (2016)

    2016

  59. [59]

    Levi and A

    A. Levi and A. Ori, Versatile method for renormalized stress-energy computation in black-hole spacetimes, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 231101 (2016)

    2016

  60. [60]

    Alberti, N

    M. Alberti, N. Zilberman, and A. Ori, in preparation

  61. [61]

    Berti, V

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes, Class. Quant. Grav.26, 163001 (2009)

    2009

  62. [62]

    V. P. Frolov and I. D. Novikov,Black Hole Physics. Basic Concepts and New Developments(luwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 1998)

    1998

  63. [63]

    Lanir, A

    A. Lanir, A. Levi, A. Ori, and O. Sela, Two-point function of a quantum scalar field in the interior region of a Reissner- Nordstrom black hole, Phys. Rev. D97, 024033 (2018). 32

    2018

  64. [64]

    S. A. Teukolsky, Perturbations of a rotating black hole. 1. Fundamental equations for gravitational, electromagnetic and neutrino-field perturbations, Astrophys. J.185, 635 (1973)

    1973

  65. [65]

    Analytic black hole perturbation approach to gravitational radiation

    M. Sasaki and H. Tagoshi, Analytic black hole perturbation approach to gravitational radiation, Living Rev. Rel.6, 6 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0306120

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  66. [66]

    McMaken and A

    T. McMaken and A. J. S. Hamilton, Hawking radiation inside a rotating black hole, Phys. Rev. D109, 065023 (2024), arXiv:2401.03098 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024