pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.30725 · v1 · pith:I2F6QV3Jnew · submitted 2026-06-29 · ✦ hep-th

Constrained particle on a group: from propagators to correlators

Guanda Lin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 01:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords super-JT gravityconstrained particlesuper-Schwarzian actionsupersymmetric correlatorspropagatorsWilson linesN=2 SJTN=4 SJT
0
0 comments X

The pith

Super-JT gravity is a constrained particle on the isometry supergroup whose quantization produces the super-Schwarzian action and supersymmetric correlators.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that super-JT gravity corresponds to a particle moving on the isometry group of the theory, subject to constraints that come directly from the boundary conditions. For the N=2 case this particle lives on SU(1,1|1) and for N=4 on PSU(1,1|2); solving the constraints recovers the super-Schwarzian actions. After quantizing the reduced system and handling the fermionic constraints, the physical worldline supercharges are obtained as those transformations that preserve the constraints. These charges are then used to construct supersymmetric interval propagators in invariant variables and boundary-anchored Wilson-line operators for both primary and descendant insertions. The resulting ingredients form an algorithm that yields explicit three-point composition kernels, zero-energy three-point functions, and four-point OTOCs including zero-energy results in the N=2 and N=4 theories.

Core claim

The (super)JT gravity can be described by a particle moving on the isometry group satisfying constraints from boundary conditions of (super)JT gravity. In this language the N=2 and N=4 theories are described by constrained particles on SU(1,1|1) and PSU(1,1|2). Solving the constraints gives the super-Schwarzian actions. Quantizing the reduced superparticle with careful treatment of the fermionic constraints yields the physical worldline supercharges from the requirement that the transformations preserve the constraints. These charges allow construction of supersymmetric interval propagators in invariant variables and formulation of boundary-anchored Wilson-line operators for both superconfor

What carries the argument

The constrained particle on the isometry supergroup, where boundary conditions impose constraints whose solution yields the super-Schwarzian action and whose quantization produces the physical supercharges used for propagators and Wilson-line operators.

If this is right

  • The N=2 and N=4 three-point composition kernels and zero-energy scalar three-point functions follow from the propagators and Wilson-line operators.
  • Four-point functions reproduce the standard bosonic JT OTOC and produce explicit zero-energy OTOCs in both N=2 and N=4 SJT.
  • The same construction supplies an algorithm that builds supersymmetric correlators from interval propagators and boundary-anchored Wilson-line operators for primary and descendant insertions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The particle-on-group method may extend to computing higher-point functions or other observables once the same propagators and operators are assembled.
  • The explicit zero-energy OTOCs obtained this way could be compared with direct super-Schwarzian calculations to test consistency at the level of four-point data.
  • The requirement that supercharges preserve the constraints may supply a template for deriving physical charges in other constrained supergroup systems.

Load-bearing premise

The boundary conditions of super-JT gravity translate directly into constraints on particle motion on the isometry supergroup such that solving the constraints and quantizing with fermionic constraints yields the correct physical supercharges and correlators.

What would settle it

An explicit mismatch between the zero-energy N=4 OTOC computed from the constrained-particle propagators and Wilson lines and the same quantity obtained by direct quantization of the super-Schwarzian action would falsify the claimed equivalence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.30725 by Guanda Lin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The zero-energy N = 2 OTOC as a function of ∆, plotted on a logarithmic scale. Left: log AN =2 4 , where the solid curve is the exact finite sum A1 + · · · + A5, and the dashed curve is the loga￾rithm of the large-∆ saddle estimate in (5.39). Right: the logarithmic residual log AN =2 4 −log AN =2 4,1−loop, which is small on the scale of the left panel but visible after zooming in. imation. The right panel … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We develop a particle-on-a-group formulation of super-JT gravity aimed at computing supersymmetric correlators. We show that the (super)JT gravity can be described by a particle moving on the isometry group satisfying constraints from boundary conditions of (super)JT gravity. In this language the $\mathcal N=2$ and $\mathcal N=4$ theories are described by constrained particles on $SU(1,1|1)$ and $PSU(1,1|2)$. Solving the constraints gives the super-Schwarzian actions. We also quantize the reduced superparticle, with careful treatment of the fermionic constraints. We then derive the physical worldline supercharges from the requirement that the transformations preserve the constraints. These charges allow us to construct supersymmetric interval propagators in invariant variables and to formulate boundary-anchored Wilson-line operators for both superconformal primary and descendant insertions. Finally, we use these ingredients to build an algorithm for correlators. We obtain the $\mathcal N=2$ and $\mathcal N=4$ three-point composition kernels and zero-energy scalar three-point functions. For four-point functions, the same method reproduces the standard bosonic JT OTOC, gives an explicit zero-energy OTOC in $\mathcal N=2$ and $\mathcal N=4$ SJT, which is potentially useful for studying Berry curvature and BPS chaos.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper develops a particle-on-a-group formulation for (super)JT gravity. Boundary conditions of JT and its N=2, N=4 supersymmetric extensions are translated into first-class constraints on a particle moving on the isometry supergroups SU(1,1|1) and PSU(1,1|2). Solving the constraints produces the super-Schwarzian actions. The reduced superparticle is quantized with explicit treatment of fermionic constraints; physical worldline supercharges are obtained by demanding that transformations preserve the constraints. These charges are used to construct supersymmetric interval propagators in invariant variables and boundary-anchored Wilson-line operators for primary and descendant insertions. The resulting algorithm yields N=2 and N=4 three-point composition kernels, zero-energy scalar three-point functions, an explicit zero-energy OTOC in both supersymmetric cases, and a reproduction of the known bosonic JT OTOC.

Significance. If the central construction holds, the work supplies a uniform, group-theoretic route to supersymmetric correlators in JT gravity that automatically incorporates the correct supercharges and constraint algebra. The explicit reproduction of the bosonic OTOC functions as a nontrivial consistency check, and the provision of concrete N=2 and N=4 zero-energy OTOCs is a concrete advance that may be directly useful for studies of BPS chaos and Berry curvature. The approach avoids ad-hoc parameter fitting and derives the super-Schwarzian directly from the constrained dynamics.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the summary states that the N=2 and N=4 three-point kernels and zero-energy OTOCs are obtained, but does not display the explicit functional forms or the composition rule used; adding the leading expressions would improve readability.
  2. [Quantization of the reduced superparticle] The quantization section should include a short table or paragraph comparing the resulting physical supercharges with those obtained from the standard super-Schwarzian quantization in the literature, to make the equivalence manifest.
  3. [Propagators and Wilson lines] Figure captions for the propagator diagrams and Wilson-line insertions would benefit from explicit labels indicating which operators correspond to primaries versus descendants.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of the manuscript, the assessment of its significance, and the recommendation for minor revision. No major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The derivation begins from the standard geometry of the isometry supergroups SU(1,1|1) and PSU(1,1|2) together with boundary conditions of (super)JT gravity, imposes first-class constraints, solves them to recover the super-Schwarzian actions, and proceeds to quantization of the reduced superparticle while preserving the constraints. Physical supercharges are obtained from constraint-preserving transformations, after which propagators, Wilson lines, and correlators (including zero-energy OTOCs) are constructed. The bosonic JT OTOC is reproduced as an external consistency check. No step reduces by definition or by self-citation to its own inputs; the chain is self-contained against group-theoretic and constraint-solving operations that do not presuppose the final correlators.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard mathematical properties of supergroups and the physical identification of boundary conditions with particle constraints; no free parameters, new entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The isometry groups of N=2 and N=4 super-JT gravity are SU(1,1|1) and PSU(1,1|2) respectively
    Invoked when stating the groups on which the constrained particles move.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5769 in / 1353 out tokens · 39299 ms · 2026-07-01T01:59:33.887407+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages · 33 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Lower Dimensional Gravity,

    R. Jackiw, “Lower Dimensional Gravity,”Nucl. Phys.B252(1985) 343–356

    1985

  2. [2]

    Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions,

    C. Teitelboim, “Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions,”Phys. Lett.126B(1983) 41–45

    1983

  3. [3]

    Models of AdS_2 Backreaction and Holography

    A. Almheiri and J. Polchinski, “Models of AdS 2 backreaction and holography,”JHEP11(2015) 014,arXiv:1402.6334 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    Chaos in AdS$_2$ holography

    K. Jensen, “Chaos in AdS 2 Holography,”Phys. Rev. Lett.117no. 11, (2016) 111601, arXiv:1605.06098 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space

    J. Maldacena, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, “Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space,”PTEP2016no. 12, (2016) 12C104, arXiv:1606.01857 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    An Investigation of AdS$_2$ Backreaction and Holography

    J. Engelsoy, T. G. Mertens, and H. Verlinde, “An investigation of AdS 2 backreaction and holography,”JHEP07(2016) 139,arXiv:1606.03438 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    The statistical mechanics of near-BPS black holes,

    M. Heydeman, L. V. Iliesiu, G. J. Turiaci, and W. Zhao, “The statistical mechanics of near-BPS black holes,”J. Phys. A55no. 1, (2022) 014004,arXiv:2011.01953 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    BPS and near-BPS black holes in AdS5 and their spectrum inN= 4 SYM,

    J. Boruch, M. T. Heydeman, L. V. Iliesiu, and G. J. Turiaci, “BPS and near-BPS black holes in AdS5 and their spectrum inN= 4 SYM,”JHEP07(2025) 220,arXiv:2203.01331 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Can black holes preserveN>4 supersymmetry?,

    M. Heydeman, X. Shi, and G. J. Turiaci, “Can black holes preserveN>4 supersymmetry?,” JHEP01(2026) 054,arXiv:2504.20146 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  10. [10]

    The statistical mechanics of near-extremal black holes,

    L. V. Iliesiu and G. J. Turiaci, “The statistical mechanics of near-extremal black holes,” arXiv:2003.02860 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2003

  11. [11]

    Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity and Rotating Black Holes,

    U. Moitra, S. K. Sake, S. P. Trivedi, and V. Vishal, “Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity and Rotating Black Holes,”arXiv:1905.10378 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 1905

  12. [12]

    Logarithmic Corrections to Kerr Thermodynamics,

    D. Kapec, A. Sheta, A. Strominger, and C. Toldo, “Logarithmic Corrections to Kerr Thermodynamics,”Phys. Rev. Lett.133no. 2, (2024) 021601,arXiv:2310.00848 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Thermodynamics of the near-extremal Kerr spacetime,

    I. Rakic, M. Rangamani, and G. J. Turiaci, “Thermodynamics of the near-extremal Kerr spacetime,”JHEP06(2024) 011,arXiv:2310.04532 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Universality in logarithmic temperature corrections to near-extremal rotating black hole thermodynamics in various dimensions,

    S. Maulik, L. A. Pando Zayas, A. Ray, and J. Zhang, “Universality in logarithmic temperature corrections to near-extremal rotating black hole thermodynamics in various dimensions,”JHEP 06(2024) 034,arXiv:2401.16507 [hep-th]. 78

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Quasinormal corrections to near-extremal black hole thermodynamics,

    D. Kapec, Y. T. A. Law, and C. Toldo, “Quasinormal corrections to near-extremal black hole thermodynamics,”JHEP06(2025) 069,arXiv:2409.14928 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Towards Black Hole Evaporation in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity,

    T. G. Mertens, “Towards Black Hole Evaporation in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity,”JHEP07 (2019) 097,arXiv:1903.10485 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    Unruh detectors and quantum chaos in JT gravity,

    A. Blommaert, T. G. Mertens, and H. Verschelde, “Unruh detectors and quantum chaos in JT gravity,”arXiv:2005.13058 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2005

  18. [18]

    Near-extremal charged black holes: greybody factors and evolution,

    Y. Bai and M. Korwar, “Near-extremal charged black holes: greybody factors and evolution,” JHEP03(2023) 151,arXiv:2301.07739 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    The evaporation of charged black holes,

    A. R. Brown, L. V. Iliesiu, G. Penington, and M. Usatyuk, “The evaporation of charged black holes,”JHEP01(2026) 109,arXiv:2411.03447 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  20. [20]

    Tearing down spacetime with quantum disentanglement,

    R. Emparan and J. M. Magan, “Tearing down spacetime with quantum disentanglement,”JHEP 03(2024) 078,arXiv:2312.06803 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Looking at extremal black holes from very far away,

    M. Kolanowski, D. Marolf, I. Rakic, M. Rangamani, and G. J. Turiaci, “Looking at extremal black holes from very far away,”JHEP04(2025) 020,arXiv:2409.16248 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Quantum cross-section of near-extremal black holes,

    R. Emparan, “Quantum cross-section of near-extremal black holes,”JHEP04(2025) 122, arXiv:2501.17470 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Following the state of an evaporating charged black hole into the quantum gravity regime,

    A. Biggs, “Following the state of an evaporating charged black hole into the quantum gravity regime,”arXiv:2503.02051 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  24. [24]

    Quantum-corrected Hawking radiation from near-extremal Kerr-Newman black holes,

    S. Maulik, X. Meng, and L. A. Pando Zayas, “Quantum-corrected Hawking radiation from near-extremal Kerr-Newman black holes,”JHEP02(2026) 205,arXiv:2501.08252 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    The evaporation of black holes in supergravity,

    G. Lin, L. V. Iliesiu, and M. Usatyuk, “The evaporation of black holes in supergravity,”JHEP 08(2025) 220,arXiv:2504.21077 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Near-extremal quantum cross-section for charged fields and superradiance,

    P. Betzios, O. Papadoulaki, and Y. Zhou, “Near-extremal quantum cross-section for charged fields and superradiance,”JHEP11(2025) 114,arXiv:2507.13896 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Black holes and the butterfly effect

    S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, “Black holes and the butterfly effect,”JHEP03(2014) 067, arXiv:1306.0622 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  28. [28]

    Localized shocks

    D. A. Roberts, D. Stanford, and L. Susskind, “Localized shocks,”JHEP03(2015) 051, arXiv:1409.8180 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  29. [29]

    Two-dimensional conformal field theory and the butterfly effect

    D. A. Roberts and D. Stanford, “Two-dimensional conformal field theory and the butterfly effect,”Phys. Rev. Lett.115no. 13, (2015) 131603,arXiv:1412.5123 [hep-th]. 79

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  30. [30]

    Chaos in quantum channels

    P. Hosur, X.-L. Qi, D. A. Roberts, and B. Yoshida, “Chaos in quantum channels,”JHEP02 (2016) 004,arXiv:1511.04021 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  31. [31]

    A bound on chaos

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, “A bound on chaos,”JHEP08(2016) 106, arXiv:1503.01409 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  32. [32]

    Comments on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model

    J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, “Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,”Phys. Rev.D94 no. 10, (2016) 106002,arXiv:1604.07818 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    Scrambling Dynamics and Out-of-Time-Ordered Correlators in Quantum Many-Body Systems,

    S. Xu and B. Swingle, “Scrambling Dynamics and Out-of-Time-Ordered Correlators in Quantum Many-Body Systems,”PRX Quantum5no. 1, (2024) 010201

    2024

  34. [34]

    Stanford, S

    D. Stanford, S. Vardhan, and S. Yao, “Scramblon loops,”JHEP10(2024) 073, arXiv:2311.12121 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    The soft mode in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model and its gravity dual

    A. Kitaev and S. J. Suh, “The soft mode in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model and its gravity dual,” JHEP05(2018) 183,arXiv:1711.08467 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  36. [36]

    Solving the Schwarzian via the Conformal Bootstrap

    T. G. Mertens, G. J. Turiaci, and H. L. Verlinde, “Solving the Schwarzian via the Conformal Bootstrap,”JHEP08(2017) 136,arXiv:1705.08408 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  37. [37]

    The Schwarzian Theory - A Wilson Line Perspective

    A. Blommaert, T. G. Mertens, and H. Verschelde, “The Schwarzian Theory - A Wilson Line Perspective,”JHEP12(2018) 022,arXiv:1806.07765 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  38. [38]

    Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity,

    T. G. Mertens and G. J. Turiaci, “Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity,”Living Rev. Rel.26no. 1, (2023) 4,arXiv:2210.10846 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    Holography for people with no time,

    H. W. Lin, J. Maldacena, L. Rozenberg, and J. Shan, “Holography for people with no time,” SciPost Phys.14no. 6, (2023) 150,arXiv:2207.00407 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    Looking at supersymmetric black holes for a very long time,

    H. W. Lin, J. Maldacena, L. Rozenberg, and J. Shan, “Looking at supersymmetric black holes for a very long time,”SciPost Phys.14no. 5, (2023) 128,arXiv:2207.00408 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    BPS Chaos

    Y. Chen, H. W. Lin, and S. H. Shenker, “BPS chaos,”SciPost Phys.18no. 2, (2025) 072, arXiv:2407.19387 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Chaos of Berry curvature for BPS microstates

    Y. Chen, S. Colin-Ellerin, O. Mamroud, and K. Papadodimas, “Chaos of Berry curvature for BPS microstates,”arXiv:2604.23287 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    Supergroup structure of Jackiw-Teitelboim supergravity,

    Y. Fan and T. G. Mertens, “Supergroup structure of Jackiw-Teitelboim supergravity,”JHEP08 (2022) 002,arXiv:2106.09353 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    Gravitational wavefunctions in JT supergravity,

    A. Belaey, F. Mariani, and T. G. Mertens, “Gravitational wavefunctions in JT supergravity,” JHEP10(2024) 037,arXiv:2405.09289 [hep-th]. 80

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Branes in JT (super)gravity from group theory,

    A. Belaey, F. Mariani, and T. G. Mertens, “Branes in JT (super)gravity from group theory,” JHEP02(2024) 058,arXiv:2310.04245 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    The Quantum Gravity Dynamics of Near Extremal Black Holes,

    Z. Yang, “The Quantum Gravity Dynamics of Near Extremal Black Holes,”JHEP05(2019) 205,arXiv:1809.08647 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    JT gravity with matter, generalized ETH, and Random Matrices,

    D. L. Jafferis, D. K. Kolchmeyer, B. Mukhametzhanov, and J. Sonner, “JT gravity with matter, generalized ETH, and Random Matrices,”arXiv:2209.02131 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  48. [48]

    Matrix models for eigenstate thermalization,

    D. L. Jafferis, D. K. Kolchmeyer, B. Mukhametzhanov, and J. Sonner, “Matrix models for eigenstate thermalization,”arXiv:2209.02130 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  49. [49]

    Algebras and states in super-JT gravity,

    G. Penington and E. Witten, “Algebras and states in super-JT gravity,”arXiv:2412.15549 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  50. [50]

    Fermionic Localization of the Schwarzian Theory

    D. Stanford and E. Witten, “Fermionic Localization of the Schwarzian Theory,”JHEP10(2017) 008,arXiv:1703.04612 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  51. [51]

    Towards a 2d QFT Analog of the SYK Model

    G. Turiaci and H. Verlinde, “Towards a 2d QFT Analog of the SYK Model,”JHEP10(2017) 167,arXiv:1701.00528 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  52. [52]

    Shockwave S-matrix from Schwarzian Quantum Mechanics

    H. T. Lam, T. G. Mertens, G. J. Turiaci, and H. Verlinde, “Shockwave S-matrix from Schwarzian Quantum Mechanics,”JHEP11(2018) 182,arXiv:1804.09834 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  53. [53]

    The Schwarzian Theory - Origins

    T. G. Mertens, “The Schwarzian theory — origins,”JHEP05(2018) 036,arXiv:1801.09605 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  54. [54]

    An exact quantization of Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity,

    L. V. Iliesiu, S. S. Pufu, H. Verlinde, and Y. Wang, “An exact quantization of Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity,”arXiv:1905.02726 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 1905

  55. [55]

    Boundary theories for dilaton supergravity in 2D

    M. C´ ardenas, O. Fuentealba, H. A. Gonz´ alez, D. Grumiller, C. Valc´ arcel, and D. Vassilevich, “Boundary theories for dilaton supergravity in 2D,”JHEP11(2018) 077,arXiv:1809.07208 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  56. [56]

    Schwarzian for colored Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity,

    K. Alkalaev, E. Joung, and J. Yoon, “Schwarzian for colored Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity,”JHEP 09(2022) 160,arXiv:2204.09010 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  57. [57]

    Schwarzian quantum mechanics as a Drinfeld-Sokolov reduction ofBFtheory,

    F. Valach and D. R. Youmans, “Schwarzian quantum mechanics as a Drinfeld-Sokolov reduction ofBFtheory,”JHEP12(2020) 189,arXiv:1912.12331 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  58. [58]

    Supersymmetric Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models,

    W. Fu, D. Gaiotto, J. Maldacena, and S. Sachdev, “Supersymmetric Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models,” Phys. Rev. D95no. 2, (2017) 026009,arXiv:1610.08917 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2017

  59. [59]

    Superschwarzian Derivatives inN= 4 SU(2) Extended Superconformal Algebras,

    S. Matsuda and T. Uematsu, “Superschwarzian Derivatives inN= 4 SU(2) Extended Superconformal Algebras,”Mod. Phys. Lett. A5(1990) 841. 81

    1990

  60. [60]

    N=4 Super-Schwarzian Theory on the Coadoint Orbit and PSU(1,1|2)

    S. Aoyama and Y. Honda, “N = 4 super-Schwarzian theory on the coadjoint orbit and PSU(1,1—2),”JHEP06(2018) 070,arXiv:1801.06800 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  61. [61]

    Notes on superconformal representations in two dimensions,

    S. Lee and S. Lee, “Notes on superconformal representations in two dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B 956(2020) 115033,arXiv:1911.10391 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  62. [62]

    Black Hole Berry Phase

    J. de Boer, K. Papadodimas, and E. Verlinde, “Black Hole Berry Phase,”Phys. Rev. Lett.103 (2009) 131301,arXiv:0809.5062 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  63. [63]

    Aspects of Berry phase in QFT

    M. Baggio, V. Niarchos, and K. Papadodimas, “Aspects of Berry phase in QFT,”JHEP04 (2017) 062,arXiv:1701.05587 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  64. [64]

    The chiral ring of AdS3/CFT2 and the attractor mechanism

    J. de Boer, J. Manschot, K. Papadodimas, and E. Verlinde, “The Chiral ring of AdS(3)/CFT(2) and the attractor mechanism,”JHEP03(2009) 030,arXiv:0809.0507 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  65. [65]

    A non-renormalization theorem for chiral primary 3-point functions

    M. Baggio, J. de Boer, and K. Papadodimas, “A non-renormalization theorem for chiral primary 3-point functions,”JHEP07(2012) 137,arXiv:1203.1036 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  66. [66]

    Microscopic Origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy

    A. Strominger and C. Vafa, “Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,”Phys. Lett. B379(1996) 99–104,arXiv:hep-th/9601029

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  67. [67]

    U(1) Charges and Moduli in the D1-D5 System

    F. Larsen and E. J. Martinec, “U(1) Charges and Moduli in the D1–D5 System,”JHEP06 (1999) 019,arXiv:hep-th/9905064

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  68. [68]

    D1/D5 Moduli in SCFT and Gauge Theory, and Hawking Radiation

    J. R. David, G. Mandal, and S. R. Wadia, “D1 / D5 moduli in SCFT and gauge theory, and Hawking radiation,”Nucl. Phys. B564(2000) 103–127,arXiv:hep-th/9907075

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  69. [69]

    The D1/D5 System And Singular CFT

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “The D1 / D5 system and singular CFT,”JHEP04(1999) 017, arXiv:hep-th/9903224

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  70. [70]

    Comments on 1/16 BPS Quantum States and Classical Configurations

    L. Grant, P. A. Grassi, S. Kim, and S. Minwalla, “Comments on 1/16 BPS Quantum States and Classical Configurations,”JHEP05(2008) 049,arXiv:0803.4183 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  71. [71]

    1/16 BPS States in N=4 SYM

    C.-M. Chang and X. Yin, “1/16 BPS states inN= 4 super-Yang–Mills theory,”Phys. Rev. D88 no. 10, (2013) 106005,arXiv:1305.6314 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  72. [72]

    Words to describe a black hole,

    C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin, “Words to describe a black hole,”JHEP02(2023) 109, arXiv:2209.06728 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    The shape of non-graviton operators for SU(2),

    S. Choi, S. Kim, E. Lee, and J. Park, “The shape of non-graviton operators for SU(2),”JHEP09 (2024) 029,arXiv:2209.12696 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    Towards quantum black hole microstates,

    S. Choi, S. Kim, E. Lee, S. Lee, and J. Park, “Towards quantum black hole microstates,”JHEP 11(2023) 175,arXiv:2304.10155 [hep-th]. 82

    work page arXiv 2023

  75. [75]

    Budzik, H

    K. Budzik, H. Murali, and P. Vieira, “Following Black Hole States,”arXiv:2306.04693 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  76. [76]

    Decoding stringy near-supersymmetric black holes,

    C.-M. Chang, L. Feng, Y.-H. Lin, and Y.-X. Tao, “Decoding stringy near-supersymmetric black holes,”SciPost Phys.16no. 4, (2024) 109,arXiv:2306.04673 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  77. [77]

    FiniteNblack hole cohomologies,

    J. Choi, S. Choi, S. Kim, J. Lee, and S. Lee, “FiniteNblack hole cohomologies,”JHEP12 (2024) 029,arXiv:2312.16443 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  78. [78]

    Holographic covering and the fortuity of black holes,

    C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin, “Holographic covering and the fortuity of black holes,” arXiv:2402.10129 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  79. [79]

    N= 2 JT supergravity and matrix models,

    G. J. Turiaci and E. Witten, “N= 2 JT supergravity and matrix models,”JHEP12(2023) 003, arXiv:2305.19438 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  80. [80]

    Supersymmetric indices factorize,

    L. V. Iliesiu, M. Kologlu, and G. J. Turiaci, “Supersymmetric indices factorize,”JHEP05(2023) 032,arXiv:2107.09062 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.