Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 125 references

Hernquist dark matter halos around rotating black holes move the event horizon outward, lower Hawking temperature, and slow evaporation.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-07-01 01:05 UTC pith:3FA4CAC7

load-bearing objection This paper uses the noncomplexification Newman-Janis algorithm on a static black hole in a Hernquist halo to generate a rotating metric and then runs the usual horizon, thermodynamic, and tunneling calculations. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.30962 v1 pith:3FA4CAC7 submitted 2026-06-29 gr-qc hep-th

A rotating black hole in a Hernquist dark matter halo: horizon geometry, thermodynamics, and quantum emission

classification gr-qc hep-th
keywords rotating black holesHernquist halodark matterHawking radiationblack hole thermodynamicsNewman-Janis algorithmevent horizonsquantum tunneling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper starts from a static black hole in a Hernquist dark matter distribution and builds its rotating version with the noncomplexification Newman-Janis algorithm. It then shows that the halo parameter shifts the outer horizon to larger radii, changes the ergoregion size, reduces surface gravity and temperature, raises entropy, and introduces a critical point in heat capacity. In the weak-halo slow-rotation limit the same distribution cuts the radiated luminosity and lengthens the evaporation time. A reader would care because these shifts alter how black holes lose mass and how their thermodynamic stability behaves when embedded in realistic galactic matter.

Core claim

The authors establish that the Hernquist halo displaces the outer event horizon toward larger radii, suppresses the Hawking temperature, increases the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, changes local thermal stability through a Davies-type critical point, and in the weak halo and slow rotation regime reduces the luminosity and delays the evaporation process.

What carries the argument

The metric obtained from the noncomplexification Newman-Janis algorithm, whose radial function Δ(r) fixes the horizon locations and whose g_tt component fixes the stationary limit surfaces, both now carrying the halo density parameter ho together with the rotation parameter a.

Load-bearing premise

The noncomplexification Newman-Janis algorithm applied to the static black hole plus Hernquist halo produces a valid rotating spacetime whose metric functions correctly encode the combined effects of rotation and the halo parameter.

What would settle it

A direct check that the constructed metric fails to satisfy the Einstein equations sourced by the Hernquist stress-energy tensor plus vacuum, or an astrophysical measurement showing that a rotating black hole in a measured Hernquist halo has exactly the same horizon radius and temperature as the vacuum Kerr case.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The outer event horizon radius grows with the halo parameter ho while the horizon becomes oblate with increasing rotation parameter a.
  • Surface gravity and Hawking temperature fall as ho rises, so the black hole radiates less intensely.
  • Bekenstein-Hawking entropy rises with the halo contribution.
  • Heat capacity exhibits a Davies-type critical point that marks a change in local thermal stability.
  • In the weak-halo slow-rotation regime the Hawking luminosity drops and the total evaporation time lengthens.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same construction could be repeated for other common halo density profiles to compare how each profile alters evaporation timescales.
  • If the metric remains valid, the increased angular velocity of zero-angular-momentum observers would modify the innermost stable circular orbits around galactic-center black holes.
  • The delay in evaporation suggests that supermassive black holes surrounded by dense halos could retain more mass over cosmic time than isolated Kerr holes of the same initial mass.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs a rotating black hole immersed in a Hernquist dark matter halo by applying the noncomplexification Newman-Janis algorithm to a static solution. It then examines the effects of the halo parameter ρ and rotation parameter a on horizon geometry (event horizons from Δ(r), ergoregions from g_tt=0), thermodynamics (surface gravity, Hawking temperature, Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, heat capacity with Davies-type critical point), and quantum emission (Hamilton-Jacobi tunneling rates, occupation numbers, luminosity and evaporation time via Stefan-Boltzmann), recovering Kerr and Schwarzschild limits in appropriate cases.

Significance. If the metric construction holds, the work supplies an explicit model showing how a Hernquist halo displaces the outer horizon, suppresses temperature, increases entropy, alters thermal stability, and delays evaporation. Strengths include systematic recovery of standard limits and concrete expressions for modified thermodynamic and emission quantities; the approach is exploratory rather than data-driven.

major comments (2)
  1. [Metric construction (abstract and NJA section)] Abstract and metric-construction section: the rotating metric is obtained via the noncomplexification Newman-Janis algorithm applied to the static Hernquist-surrounded spacetime. This is a coordinate-transformation prescription rather than a solution-generating technique guaranteed to satisfy the Einstein equations with the original halo stress-energy tensor; any mismatch would invalidate the subsequent horizon locations, surface gravity, heat capacity, and tunneling rates derived from Δ(r) and the metric functions.
  2. [Thermodynamic quantities] Thermodynamics and stability section: the claim of a halo-induced Davies-type critical point in the heat capacity is load-bearing for the stability modification statement, yet its explicit location depends on the unverified rotating metric functions; without an independent check that the metric solves the field equations, the critical-point result cannot be taken as robust.
minor comments (2)
  1. Explicitly tabulate or plot the limiting cases a o0 and ho o0 for all derived quantities (horizons, temperature, luminosity) to confirm recovery of known results.
  2. Clarify the domain of validity of the weak-halo/slow-rotation approximations used for the luminosity and evaporation-time estimates.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for highlighting important methodological points. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Metric construction (abstract and NJA section)] Abstract and metric-construction section: the rotating metric is obtained via the noncomplexification Newman-Janis algorithm applied to the static Hernquist-surrounded spacetime. This is a coordinate-transformation prescription rather than a solution-generating technique guaranteed to satisfy the Einstein equations with the original halo stress-energy tensor; any mismatch would invalidate the subsequent horizon locations, surface gravity, heat capacity, and tunneling rates derived from Δ(r) and the metric functions.

    Authors: We agree that the noncomplexification Newman-Janis algorithm is a coordinate transformation rather than a method that automatically preserves the original stress-energy tensor. This limitation is inherent to the technique and has been noted in the broader literature on its application to spacetimes with matter. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit paragraph in the metric-construction section stating that the resulting metric is an effective description whose compatibility with the Einstein equations for the Hernquist halo must be verified separately, and we will qualify all subsequent results as holding within this effective model. We will also recover the Kerr and Schwarzschild limits explicitly to confirm consistency in the vacuum cases. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Thermodynamic quantities] Thermodynamics and stability section: the claim of a halo-induced Davies-type critical point in the heat capacity is load-bearing for the stability modification statement, yet its explicit location depends on the unverified rotating metric functions; without an independent check that the metric solves the field equations, the critical-point result cannot be taken as robust.

    Authors: The Davies-type critical point is obtained directly from the heat-capacity expression constructed from the metric functions after the Newman-Janis procedure. Because the thermodynamic quantities are derived from the same metric used for the horizons and ergoregions, they remain internally consistent within the effective model. We will revise the thermodynamics section to state clearly that the location of the critical point is model-dependent and to reiterate the effective nature of the metric, thereby qualifying the stability claim without altering the explicit expressions. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: external parameters and derived quantities from metric

full rationale

The derivation begins with an externally specified static seed metric containing the Hernquist parameter ρ, applies the noncomplexification NJA to introduce the independent rotation parameter a, and then computes all subsequent quantities (Δ(r) roots for horizons, surface gravity for temperature, entropy, heat capacity, tunneling rates, luminosity) directly from the resulting metric components. No quantity is defined in terms of itself, no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation chain; standard limits recover Kerr/Schwarzschild cases, confirming the chain is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The construction rests on the validity of the Newman-Janis procedure for the given static metric and introduces the halo parameter ρ as a free input characterizing the dark matter distribution.

free parameters (2)
  • ρ
    Halo density parameter that sets the strength of the Hernquist dark matter distribution.
  • a
    Rotation parameter of the black hole, standard in Kerr-like metrics.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The noncomplexification Newman-Janis algorithm applies to the static black hole metric with Hernquist halo.
    This is the explicit starting assumption used to construct the rotating solution from the static one.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5852 in / 1407 out tokens · 39897 ms · 2026-07-01T01:05:49.113282+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the geometrical, thermodynamic, and quantum emission properties of a rotating black hole immersed in a Hernquist dark matter halo. Starting from a static black hole spacetime surrounded by a Hernquist distribution, we construct its rotating counterpart through the noncomplexification formulation of the Newman-Janis algorithm and analyze the modifications induced by the halo parameter $\rho$ and the rotation parameter $a$. The horizon structure is determined from the roots of the radial function $\Delta(r)$, while the stationary limit surfaces and the corresponding ergoregions are obtained from the condition $g_{tt}=0$. We show that the Hernquist contribution displaces the outer event horizon toward larger radii and modifies the size of the ergoregion, whereas rotation controls the oblateness of the horizon and the strength of frame dragging. The angular velocity of zero angular momentum observers is also increased by the surrounding matter distribution. We further derive the surface gravity, Hawking temperature, Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, and heat capacity, showing that the dark matter halo suppresses the temperature, increases the entropy, and changes the local thermal stability through a Davies-type critical point. The quantum tunneling rate is obtained from the Hamilton-Jacobi method, leading to the corresponding occupation number and particle creation density. Finally, we estimate the Hawking luminosity (radiation), evaporation time, and spectral emission rates within a Stefan-Boltzmann approximation. In the weak halo and slow rotation regime, the Hernquist distribution reduces the luminosity and delays the evaporation process. All standard Kerr and Schwarzschild results are recovered in the appropriate limiting cases.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.30962 by A. A. Ara\'ujo Filho, Amilcar R. Queiroz, Arun Kumar, C. F. S. Pereira, N. Heidari, V. B. Bezerra.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Radial behavior of ∆(r) for different values of the model parameters. In the left panel, we fix a = 0.1 and M = 1 and vary the Hernquist parameter ρ, whereas, in the right panel, we set ρ = 0.1 and M = 1 and vary the rotation parameter a. Increasing ρ shifts ∆(r) downward, while increasing a shifts it upward. its first-order correction becomes singular in this limit. The extremal configuration must instead… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Behavior of the outer event horizon radius rh for different values of the Hernquist parameter ρ in the left panel and of the rotation parameter a in the right panel. The remaining parameters are fixed at the values indicated in the respective panels [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Three-dimensional representation of the outer event horizon radius rh in the (a, ρ) parameter space for a fixed value of the black hole mass. Since Σ(r, θ) is nonvanishing outside the curvature singularity, the stationary limit surfaces follow from ∆(r) − a 2 sin2 θ = 0, or, equivalently, r 2 f(r) + a 2 cos2 θ = 0. After multiplying by (r + 2M), the corresponding cubic equation becomes E(r, ρ, θ) ≡ [PITH_… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Two-dimensional representations of the outer event horizon for selected values of the Hernquist and rotation parameters. The parameter choices are indicated in the respective panels. The resulting first-order correction is r ± e,1 (θ) = 16πM3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Ergosphere profiles for different configurations of the system. In the left panel, we fix ρ = 0.001 and M = 1 and vary the rotation parameter a, whereas, in the right panel, we set a = 0.5 and M = 1 and consider different values of ρ. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Three-dimensional representations of the event horizon and ergosphere for ρ = 0.001 and different values of the rotation parameter a: a = 0.6 (top left), a = 0.7 (top right), a = 0.8 (bottom left), and a = 0.9 (bottom right). For the rotating black hole surrounded by the Hernquist dark matter distribution, Eq. (48) gives [111, 112] ω(r, θ; ρ, a) = a [r 2 + a 2 − ∆(r)] (r 2 + a 2 ) 2 − a 2∆(r) sin2 θ . (49)… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Three–dimensional representations of the event horizon and ergosphere for a = 0.9 and different values of the dark matter parameter ρ: ρ = 10−4 (top left), ρ = 5 × 10−4 (top right), ρ = 10 × 10−4 (bottom left), and ρ = 20 × 10−4 (bottom right). The Kerr result is recovered by removing the dark matter contribution, namely, by taking ρ → 0. In this limit, Eq. (49) reduces to ωKerr(r, θ) = 2aMr (r 2 + a 2 ) 2… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The angular velocity ω(r, ρ, a) as a function of the radial coordinate r for different values of ρ (left panel) and the rotation parameter a (right panel). The influence of the Hernquist parameter can also be established directly from Eq. (49). For positive a, M, and r, one obtains ∂ω ∂ρ = 32πaM3 r 2 (r 2 + a 2 ) (r 2 + a 2 cos2 θ) (r + 2M) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Hawking temperature T(ρ, a, M) as a function of the black hole mass M for different values of the Hernquist dark matter parameter ρ, with the rotation parameter fixed at a = 0.1. The curves were obtained from the complete temperature and horizon equations. Increasing ρ suppresses the Hawking temperature and shifts the zero-temperature extremal configuration, whose perturbative position is given by Mext ≃ a… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Entropy S(ρ, a, M) as a function of the black hole mass M for different values of the Hernquist dark matter parameter ρ, with the rotation parameter fixed at a = 0.9. The entropy increases with both M and ρ, reflecting the enlargement of the event horizon area induced by the surrounding dark matter distribution. among the curves becomes increasingly pronounced for larger values of M, which indicates that … view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Heat capacity CV (ρ, a, M) as a function of the black hole mass M for different values of the Hernquist dark matter parameter ρ, with the rotation parameter fixed at a = 0.4. The divergence separates locally stable configurations with CV > 0 from unstable configurations with CV < 0 and marks a Davies-type critical point. To remove the coordinate singularity at ∆(rh) = 0, we introduce the advanced coordina… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Particle occupation number ⟨NωJ ⟩ in the low–frequency regime for small values of J. The top panel shows the effect of varying the Hernquist parameter ρ at fixed a, whereas the bottom panel shows the effect of varying the rotation parameter a at fixed ρ. In both panels, the particle occupation number decreases as the corresponding parameter increases. Equation (100) should be understood as a thermal estim… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Particle creation density dn/dω as a function of the frequency ω. The top panel shows the effect of varying the Hernquist parameter ρ at fixed a, whereas the bottom panel shows the effect of varying the rotation parameter a at fixed ρ. Therefore, the tunnelling method determines the thermal factor, while the greybody factor controls the fraction of particles that can propagate through the exterior effecti… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Particle number density n as a function of the Hernquist parameter ρ for different values of the rotation parameter a. T can produce a more pronounced modification in the number of particles created. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_14.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

125 extracted references · 125 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein’s theory,

    K. Schwarzschild, “On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein’s theory,”Sitzungs- ber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys. ), vol. 1916, pp. 189–196, 1916

  2. [2]

    Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities,

    R. Penrose, “Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 14, pp. 57–59, 1965

  3. [3]

    R. M. Wald,General Relativity. Chicago, USA: Chicago Univ. Pr., 1984

  4. [4]

    d’Inverno,Introducing Einstein’s relativity

    R. d’Inverno,Introducing Einstein’s relativity. 1992

  5. [5]

    Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics,

    R. P. Kerr, “Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 11, pp. 237–238, 1963

  6. [6]

    Metric of a rotating, charged mass,

    E. T. Newman, E. Couch, K. Chinnapared, A. Exton, A. Prakash, and R. Torrence, “Metric of a rotating, charged mass,”J. Math. Phys., vol. 6, pp. 918–919, 1965

  7. [7]

    Black holes and entropy,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Black holes and entropy,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 7, pp. 2333–2346, 1973

  8. [8]

    The four laws of black hole mechanics,

    J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter, and S. W. Hawking, “The four laws of black hole mechanics,”Commun. Math. Phys., vol. 31, pp. 161–170, 1973

  9. [9]

    Black holes and thermodynamics,

    S. W. Hawking, “Black holes and thermodynamics,”Physical Review D, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 191, 1976

  10. [10]

    Charged black holes with Yukawa potential,

    A. A. A. Filho, K. Jusufi, B. Cuadros-Melgar, G. Leon, A. Jawad, and C. E. Pellicer, “Charged black holes with Yukawa potential,”Phys. Dark Univ., vol. 46, p. 101711, 2024

  11. [11]

    Implications of a simpson–visser solution in verlinde’s framework,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, “Implications of a simpson–visser solution in verlinde’s framework,”The Euro- pean Physical Journal C, vol. 84, no. 1, p. 73, 2024

  12. [12]

    Phase structure and critical behaviour of charged-AdS black holes with perfect fluid dark matter,

    A. Kumar, A. Sood, J. K. Singh, A. Beesham, and S. G. Ghosh, “Phase structure and critical behaviour of charged-AdS black holes with perfect fluid dark matter,”Phys. Dark Univ., vol. 40, p. 101220, 2023

  13. [13]

    Particle Creation by Black Holes,

    S. W. Hawking, “Particle Creation by Black Holes,”Commun. Math. Phys., vol. 43, pp. 199–220,

  14. [14]

    46, 206 (1976)]

    [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

  15. [15]

    Cosmological Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Particle Creation,

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Cosmological Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Particle Creation,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 15, pp. 2738–2751, 1977

  16. [16]

    Thermodynamics of Black Holes,

    P. C. W. Davies, “Thermodynamics of Black Holes,”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, vol. 353, pp. 499–521, 1977. 37

  17. [17]

    Matter - Antimatter Accounting, Thermody- namics, and Black Hole Radiation,

    D. Toussaint, S. B. Treiman, F. Wilczek, and A. Zee, “Matter - Antimatter Accounting, Thermody- namics, and Black Hole Radiation,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 19, pp. 1036–1045, 1979

  18. [18]

    Particle production induced by a Lorentzian non-commutative spacetime,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, “Particle production induced by a Lorentzian non-commutative spacetime,” Annals Phys., vol. 481, p. 170167, 2025

  19. [19]

    Thermodynamics of Black Holes in anti-De Sitter Space,

    S. W. Hawking and D. N. Page, “Thermodynamics of Black Holes in anti-De Sitter Space,”Commun. Math. Phys., vol. 87, p. 577, 1983

  20. [20]

    Black hole thermodynamics and the Euclidean Einstein action,

    J. W. York, Jr., “Black hole thermodynamics and the Euclidean Einstein action,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 33, pp. 2092–2099, 1986

  21. [21]

    Moduli, scalar charges, and the first law of black hole thermodynamics,

    G. W. Gibbons, R. Kallosh, and B. Kol, “Moduli, scalar charges, and the first law of black hole thermodynamics,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 77, pp. 4992–4995, 1996

  22. [22]

    Photon orbits and phase transitions in Kiselev- AdS black holes fromf(R, T) gravity,

    A. Sood, A. Kumar, J. K. Singh, and S. G. Ghosh, “Photon orbits and phase transitions in Kiselev- AdS black holes fromf(R, T) gravity,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 84, no. 8, p. 876, 2024

  23. [23]

    Hayward–Letelier Black Holes in AdS Space- time,

    A. Kumar, A. Sood, S. G. Ghosh, and A. Beesham, “Hayward–Letelier Black Holes in AdS Space- time,”Particles, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1017–1037, 2024

  24. [24]

    Extended phase space thermodynamics of Bardeen–Letelier black holes in 4D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity,

    A. Kumar, S. G. Ghosh, and A. Beesham, “Extended phase space thermodynamics of Bardeen–Letelier black holes in 4D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity,”Eur. Phys. J. Plus, vol. 139, no. 5, p. 439, 2024

  25. [25]

    How does non-metricity affect particle creation and evaporation in bumblebee gravity?,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, “How does non-metricity affect particle creation and evaporation in bumblebee gravity?,”JCAP, vol. 06, p. 026, 2025. [Erratum: JCAP 02, E01 (2026)]

  26. [26]

    N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 1982

  27. [27]

    V. P. Frolov and I. D. Novikov,Black Hole Physics: Basic Concepts and New Developments. Dor- drecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998

  28. [28]

    Lyapunov Exponent Approach to Phase Structure of Schwarzschild AdS Black Holes Surrounded by a Cloud of Strings,

    A. Kumar, Q. Wu, T. Zhu, and S. G. Ghosh, “Lyapunov Exponent Approach to Phase Structure of Schwarzschild AdS Black Holes Surrounded by a Cloud of Strings,”Chin. J. Phys., vol. 103, 2026

  29. [29]

    Thermodynamics of massless particles in curved spacetime,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, “Thermodynamics of massless particles in curved spacetime,”International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, vol. 20, no. 13, p. 2350226, 2023

  30. [30]

    Hawking radiation and black hole thermodynamics,

    D. N. Page, “Hawking radiation and black hole thermodynamics,”New J. Phys., vol. 7, p. 203, 2005

  31. [31]

    Black hole thermodynamics,

    S. Carlip, “Black hole thermodynamics,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, vol. 23, no. 11, p. 1430023, 2014

  32. [32]

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho,Thermal aspects of field theories. Amazon. com, 2022

  33. [33]

    Non-commutativity in Hayward spacetime,

    N. Heidari, A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, and I. P. Lobo, “Non-commutativity in Hayward spacetime,”JCAP, vol. 09, p. 051, 2025

  34. [34]

    Note on the kerr spinning-particle metric,

    E. T. Newman and A. I. Janis, “Note on the kerr spinning-particle metric,”J. Math. Phys., vol. 6, pp. 915–917, 1965. 38

  35. [35]

    Structure of gravitational sources,

    A. I. Janis and E. T. Newman, “Structure of gravitational sources,”J. Math. Phys., vol. 6, pp. 902– 914, 1965

  36. [36]

    From static to rotating to conformal static solutions: Rotating imperfect fluid wormholes with(out) electric or magnetic field,

    M. Azreg-A¨ ınou, “From static to rotating to conformal static solutions: Rotating imperfect fluid wormholes with(out) electric or magnetic field,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 74, p. 2865, 2014

  37. [37]

    Generating rotating regular black hole solutions without complexification,

    M. Azreg-A¨ ınou, “Generating rotating regular black hole solutions without complexification,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 90, no. 6, p. 064041, 2014

  38. [38]

    Rotating regular black holes,

    C. Bambi and L. Modesto, “Rotating regular black holes,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 721, pp. 329–334, 2013

  39. [39]

    A nonsingular rotating black hole,

    S. G. Ghosh, “A nonsingular rotating black hole,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 75, no. 11, p. 532, 2015

  40. [40]

    Rotating black holes in 4d einstein–gauss–bonnet gravity and its shadow,

    R. Kumar and S. G. Ghosh, “Rotating black holes in 4d einstein–gauss–bonnet gravity and its shadow,”JCAP, vol. 07, p. 053, 2020

  41. [41]

    Testing loop quantum gravity from observational conse- quences of nonsingular rotating black holes,

    S. Brahma, C.-Y. Chen, and D.-h. Yeom, “Testing loop quantum gravity from observational conse- quences of nonsingular rotating black holes,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 126, no. 18, p. 181301, 2021

  42. [42]

    Investigating loop quantum gravity with eht observational effects of rotating black holes,

    S. U. Islam, J. Kumar, R. K. Walia, and S. G. Ghosh, “Investigating loop quantum gravity with eht observational effects of rotating black holes,”Astrophys. J., vol. 943, no. 1, p. 22, 2023

  43. [43]

    Properties of an axisymmetric Lorentzian non-commutative black hole,

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, J. R. Nascimento, A. Y. Petrov, P. J. Porf´ ırio, and A.¨Ovg¨ un, “Properties of an axisymmetric Lorentzian non-commutative black hole,”Phys. Dark Univ., vol. 47, p. 101796, 2025

  44. [44]

    Probing loop quantum gravity black holes through gravitational lensing,

    A. Kumar, Q. Wu, T. Zhu, and S. G. Ghosh, “Probing loop quantum gravity black holes through gravitational lensing,”Phys. Dark Univ., vol. 52, p. 102305, 2026

  45. [45]

    Probing Lorentz symmetry violation through lensing observables of rotating black holes,

    A. Kumar, S. U. Islam, and S. G. Ghosh, “Probing Lorentz symmetry violation through lensing observables of rotating black holes,”Phys. Dark Univ., vol. 52, p. 102307, 2026

  46. [46]

    Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints,

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, “Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints,” Phys. Rept., vol. 405, pp. 279–390, 2005

  47. [47]

    Review of Observational Evidence for Dark Matter in the Universe and in upcoming searches for Dark Stars,

    K. Freese, “Review of Observational Evidence for Dark Matter in the Universe and in upcoming searches for Dark Stars,”EAS Publ. Ser., vol. 36, pp. 113–126, 2009

  48. [48]

    The Connection between Galaxies and their Dark Matter Halos,

    R. H. Wechsler and J. L. Tinker, “The Connection between Galaxies and their Dark Matter Halos,” Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., vol. 56, pp. 435–487, 2018

  49. [49]

    How Dark Matter Came to Matter,

    J. de Swart, G. Bertone, and J. van Dongen, “How Dark Matter Came to Matter,”Nature Astron., vol. 1, p. 0059, 2017

  50. [50]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,

    N. Aghanimet al., “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,”Astron. Astrophys., vol. 641, p. A6, 2020. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

  51. [51]

    Dark matter and the early Universe: a review,

    A. Arbey and F. Mahmoudi, “Dark matter and the early Universe: a review,”Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., vol. 119, p. 103865, 2021

  52. [52]

    Review on dark matter searches,

    S. Cebri´ an, “Review on dark matter searches,”J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 2502, no. 1, p. 012004, 2023

  53. [53]

    Direct Detection of Dark Matter: A Critical Review,

    M. Misiaszek and N. Rossi, “Direct Detection of Dark Matter: A Critical Review,”Symmetry, vol. 16, no. 2, p. 201, 2024. 39

  54. [54]

    The Structure and dynamical evolution of dark matter halos,

    G. Tormen, F. R. Bouchet, and S. D. M. White, “The Structure and dynamical evolution of dark matter halos,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., vol. 286, pp. 865–884, 1997

  55. [55]

    Simulations of x-ray clusters,

    J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, “Simulations of x-ray clusters,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., vol. 275, pp. 720–740, 1995

  56. [56]

    The Structure of cold dark matter halos,

    J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, “The Structure of cold dark matter halos,”Astrophys. J., vol. 462, pp. 563–575, 1996

  57. [57]

    EinastoTrudy Astrofizicheskogo Instituta Alma-Ata, vol

    J. EinastoTrudy Astrofizicheskogo Instituta Alma-Ata, vol. 5, pp. 87–100, 1965

  58. [58]

    Cold dark matter haloes in the Planck era: evolution of structural parameters for Einasto and NFW profiles,

    A. A. Dutton and A. V. Macci` o, “Cold dark matter haloes in the Planck era: evolution of structural parameters for Einasto and NFW profiles,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., vol. 441, no. 4, pp. 3359– 3374, 2014

  59. [59]

    Empirical models for Dark Matter Halos. I. Nonparametric Construction of Density Profiles and Comparison with Parametric Models,

    A. W. Graham, D. Merritt, B. Moore, J. Diemand, and B. Terzic, “Empirical models for Dark Matter Halos. I. Nonparametric Construction of Density Profiles and Comparison with Parametric Models,” Astron. J., vol. 132, pp. 2685–2700, 2006

  60. [60]

    The Structure of dark matter halos in dwarf galaxies,

    A. Burkert, “The Structure of dark matter halos in dwarf galaxies,”Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 447, p. L25, 1995

  61. [61]

    Dark matter scaling relations,

    P. Salucci and A. Burkert, “Dark matter scaling relations,”Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 537, pp. L9–L12, 2000

  62. [62]

    A family of potential–density pairs for spherical galaxies and bulges,

    W. Dehnen, “A family of potential–density pairs for spherical galaxies and bulges,”Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 265, pp. 250–256, 11 1993

  63. [63]

    Modified Gravity and the Phantom of Dark Matter,

    J. R. Brownstein, “Modified Gravity and the Phantom of Dark Matter,” other thesis, 8 2009

  64. [64]

    Cold collapse and the core catastro- phe,

    B. Moore, T. R. Quinn, F. Governato, J. Stadel, and G. Lake, “Cold collapse and the core catastro- phe,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., vol. 310, pp. 1147–1152, 1999

  65. [65]

    An analytical model for spherical galaxies and bulges,

    L. Hernquist, “An analytical model for spherical galaxies and bulges,”Astrophys. J., vol. 356, pp. 359– 364, 1990

  66. [66]

    Schwarzschild black hole in galaxies surrounded by a dark matter halo,

    A. Al-Badawi, S. Shaymatov, and Y. Sekhmani, “Schwarzschild black hole in galaxies surrounded by a dark matter halo,”JCAP, vol. 02, p. 014, 2025

  67. [67]

    Thermodynamics, weak gravitational lensing, and parameter estimation of a Schwarzschild black hole immersed in Hernquist dark matter halo,

    S. K. Jha, “Thermodynamics, weak gravitational lensing, and parameter estimation of a Schwarzschild black hole immersed in Hernquist dark matter halo,”JCAP, vol. 06, p. 033, 2025

  68. [68]

    Investigating effects of dark matter on photon orbits and black hole shadows,

    A. Anjum, M. Afrin, and S. G. Ghosh, “Investigating effects of dark matter on photon orbits and black hole shadows,”Phys. Dark Univ., vol. 40, p. 101195, 2023

  69. [69]

    Gravitational ringing and superradiant insta- bilities of the kerr-like black holes in a dark matter halo,

    D. Liu, Y. Yang, A. ¨Ovg¨ un, Z.-W. Long, and Z. Xu, “Gravitational ringing and superradiant insta- bilities of the kerr-like black holes in a dark matter halo,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 83, p. 565, 2023

  70. [70]

    New analytical model of rotating black hole with dark matter halo: constraints from EHT observations and accretion disk,

    U. Uktamov, S. Shaymatov, B. Ahmedov, and C. Yuan, “New analytical model of rotating black hole with dark matter halo: constraints from EHT observations and accretion disk,”Eur. Phys. J. Plus, vol. 141, no. 5, p. 513, 2026. 40

  71. [71]

    Astrophysical signatures of black holes in beta dark matter halos: Qpo constraints from x-ray binaries, shadow, accretion, and thermal radiation,

    F. Ahmed, A. Al-Badawi, and ˙Izzet Sakallı, “Astrophysical signatures of black holes in beta dark matter halos: Qpo constraints from x-ray binaries, shadow, accretion, and thermal radiation,”Physics of the Dark Universe, vol. 53, p. 102368, 2026

  72. [72]

    Supermassive black hole in NGC 4649 (M60) with a dark matter halo: impact on shadow measurements and thermodynamic properties,

    F. S. N. Lobo, J. A. A. Ramos, and M. E. Rodrigues, “Supermassive black hole in NGC 4649 (M60) with a dark matter halo: impact on shadow measurements and thermodynamic properties,”JCAP, vol. 09, p. 024, 2025

  73. [73]

    Relativistic structure of a supermassive black hole embedded in the dark matter halo of NGC 4649 (M60),

    F. S. N. Lobo, J. A. A. Ramos, and M. E. Rodrigues, “Relativistic structure of a supermassive black hole embedded in the dark matter halo of NGC 4649 (M60),”Phys. Dark Univ., vol. 49, p. 102026, 2025

  74. [74]

    Optical properties of black holes immersed in Galactic Dark Matter Halo,

    A. Mehmood, A. Eid, M. U. Shahzad, and A. M. Sultan, “Optical properties of black holes immersed in Galactic Dark Matter Halo,”Phys. Dark Univ., vol. 50, p. 102115, 2025

  75. [75]

    Schwarzschild black hole in King’s dark matter halo,

    S. Zare, F. Hosseinifar, L. M. Nieto, D. J. Gogoi, K. Boshkayev, A. Urazalina, and H. Hassanabadi, “Schwarzschild black hole in King’s dark matter halo,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 86, no. 2, p. 160, 2026

  76. [76]

    Periodic orbits and quasinormal modes of a black hole surrounded by King dark matter halo,

    H. Hassanabadi, J. Zhang, D. J. Gogoi, F. Hosseinifar, and S. Zare, “Periodic orbits and quasinormal modes of a black hole surrounded by King dark matter halo,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 86, no. 2, p. 119, 2026

  77. [77]

    Accretion disk luminosity and topological characteristics for a Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by a Hernquist dark matter halo,

    L. M. Nieto, F. Hosseinifar, K. Boshkayev, S. Zare, and H. Hassanabadi, “Accretion disk luminosity and topological characteristics for a Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by a Hernquist dark matter halo,”Phys. Dark Univ., vol. 50, p. 102151, 2025

  78. [78]

    Scalar, electromagnetic, and Dirac perturbations of regular black holes constituting primordial dark matter,

    B. C. L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu, “Scalar, electromagnetic, and Dirac perturbations of regular black holes constituting primordial dark matter,” 4 2026

  79. [79]

    Geodesics and scalar perturbations of Schwarzschild black holes embedded in a Dehnen-type dark matter halo with quintessence,

    B. Hamil, A. Al-Badawi, and B. C. L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu, “Geodesics and scalar perturbations of Schwarzschild black holes embedded in a Dehnen-type dark matter halo with quintessence,”Phys. Scripta, vol. 100, no. 10, p. 105008, 2025

  80. [80]

    Thermodynamics of charged Bardeen-AdS black hole with perfect fluid dark matter and cloud of strings,

    A. Al-Badawi, F. Ahmed, and ˙I. Sakallı, “Thermodynamics of charged Bardeen-AdS black hole with perfect fluid dark matter and cloud of strings,”Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 1029, p. 117531, 2026

Showing first 80 references.