pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.00974 · v1 · pith:LEYTSLEJnew · submitted 2026-07-01 · 💻 cs.IT · cs.CV· math.IT

QuaMoE-DRF: Proactive Beam and Rate Adaptation via Multimodal Dynamic Radio Map Forecasting in ISAC Networks

Zhihan Zeng , Kaihe Wang , Zhongpei Zhang , Chongwen Huang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 05:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.IT cs.CVmath.IT
keywords ISAC networksbeam predictiondynamic radio mapmultimodal forecastingmixture of expertsproactive adaptationblockage prediction
0
0 comments X

The pith

The full multi-BS beam-SINR field suffices for all finite-codebook BS, beam, MCS, goodput and outage decisions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that a forecasted future beam-SINR field across multiple base stations contains enough information to select base stations, beams, and modulation and coding schemes while estimating goodput and outage probability. Static maps miss moving blockages and single beam indices discard SINR margins and alternatives, so the work builds a multimodal forecaster that fuses geometry, motion events, sensing states, and history. A quality-aware mixture-of-experts module produces the field and the decisions together. On a dynamic multi-BS urban benchmark the method reaches 402.5 Mbps effective rate at 0.0417 outage probability.

Core claim

The full multi-BS beam-SINR field is sufficient for finite-codebook threshold-rate BS, beam, MCS, goodput, and outage decisions. QuaMoE-DRF learns a compact reference-BS local field with BS-level and joint BS-beam supervision plus latent network context, then fuses static geometry, event-like motion observations, structured sensing states, and wireless history through a quality-aware mixture-of-experts module to jointly predict the map channels and the proactive decisions.

What carries the argument

The future beam-SINR field, used as the central sufficient statistic for threshold-rate decisions across base stations and beams.

If this is right

  • The complete beam-SINR field alone supports all listed decisions without separate per-task models.
  • The compact local-field projection requires BS-level and joint supervision and cannot handle BS association by itself.
  • Proactive forecasting yields 402.5 Mbps effective rate and 0.0417 outage probability on the multi-BS urban benchmark.
  • The method improves effective rate by 5.67 percent and reduces outage by 8.35 percent relative to the strongest baseline.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If simulator labels are replaced by real measurements the same sufficiency argument could be tested in live networks.
  • The separation of reference-BS forecasting from full network association suggests a modular architecture where local fields feed a separate association layer.

Load-bearing premise

Validation labels come from a compact blockage and path-loss simulator rather than full ray tracing or real measurements.

What would settle it

Compare the BS, beam, and MCS decisions produced from the predicted beam-SINR field against decisions derived from full ray-tracing data in the identical dynamic scenario and measure any drop in effective rate or rise in outage.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00974 by Chongwen Huang, Kaihe Wang, Zhihan Zeng, Zhongpei Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Dynamic urban ISAC scenario for blockage-aware proactive beam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Architecture of the proposed QuaMoE-DRF framework with mul [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Effective rate sensitivity under event map dropout, sensing vector [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Representative dynamic radio map scenarios used in the benchmark. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Static radio maps provide location-dependent propagation priors, but they cannot capture short-term blockage caused by moving objects. Direct sensing-assisted beam prediction is also limited because a beam index discards SINR margins, MCS thresholds, BS alternatives, and communication-equivalent neighboring beams. This paper proposes QuaMoE-DRF, a quality-aware multimodal dynamic radio map forecasting framework for proactive beam and rate adaptation in ISAC networks. Its core representation is a future beam-SINR field. We show that the full multi-BS beam-SINR field is sufficient for finite-codebook threshold-rate BS, beam, MCS, goodput, and outage decisions. For tractability, the implemented model learns a compact reference-BS local field, complemented by BS-level supervision, joint BS--beam supervision, and latent network context; we also clarify that this compact projection alone is not sufficient for BS association. QuaMoE-DRF fuses static geometry, event-like motion observations, structured sensing states, and wireless history through a quality-aware mixture-of-experts module motivated by inverse-variance fusion under heteroscedastic modality errors. It jointly predicts communication-oriented map channels and proactive BS, beam, and MCS decisions. On a dynamic multi-BS and multi-UE urban benchmark, QuaMoE-DRF achieves 402.5 Mbps effective rate, 0.0417 outage probability, and 0.1836 map RMSE, improving the effective rate by 5.67% and reducing outage by 8.35% over the strongest completed effective-rate baseline. The current validation uses labels from a compact blockage/path-loss simulator, with ray tracing used only for calibration and sanity checking.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes QuaMoE-DRF, a quality-aware multimodal dynamic radio map forecasting framework for proactive beam and rate adaptation in ISAC networks. Its core contribution is the claim that the full multi-BS beam-SINR field is information-theoretically sufficient for finite-codebook threshold-rate decisions on BS association, beam selection, MCS, goodput, and outage; the model learns a compact reference-BS projection augmented by multi-level supervision and fuses static geometry, motion observations, sensing states, and history via a quality-aware MoE module. On a dynamic multi-BS/multi-UE urban benchmark using a compact blockage/path-loss simulator (ray tracing only for calibration), it reports 402.5 Mbps effective rate, 0.0417 outage, 0.1836 map RMSE, with 5.67% rate gain and 8.35% outage reduction over the strongest baseline.

Significance. If the sufficiency result generalizes beyond the simulator, the work could support more robust proactive adaptation in ISAC by treating the beam-SINR field as a sufficient statistic and by introducing inverse-variance-motivated modality fusion. The explicit acknowledgment that the compact projection alone is insufficient for BS association and the joint prediction of map channels plus decisions are constructive elements. However, the current evidence base does not yet establish robustness against unmodeled propagation effects.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'the full multi-BS beam-SINR field is sufficient for finite-codebook threshold-rate BS, beam, MCS, goodput, and outage decisions' is demonstrated exclusively on labels generated by the same compact blockage/path-loss simulator whose path-loss and blockage rules define the decision thresholds; sufficiency therefore holds by construction inside the generative model and does not address whether the field remains sufficient once diffuse scattering, hardware non-idealities, or dynamic multipath are present.
  2. [Results] Results section (performance numbers): the reported 402.5 Mbps rate, 0.0417 outage, and 5.67%/8.35% gains are given without error bars, without exact baseline code or hyper-parameter details, and without quantifying how the compact reference-BS projection (explicitly stated as insufficient for BS association) affects the measured gains; this weakens the empirical support for the sufficiency claim.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Method] The motivation for the quality-aware MoE as inverse-variance fusion under heteroscedastic errors is stated but the precise weighting equations and how modality-specific variances are estimated are not shown in the provided abstract; a short derivation or pseudocode would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on the sufficiency claim and empirical presentation. We address each major comment below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'the full multi-BS beam-SINR field is sufficient for finite-codebook threshold-rate BS, beam, MCS, goodput, and outage decisions' is demonstrated exclusively on labels generated by the same compact blockage/path-loss simulator whose path-loss and blockage rules define the decision thresholds; sufficiency therefore holds by construction inside the generative model and does not address whether the field remains sufficient once diffuse scattering, hardware non-idealities, or dynamic multipath are present.

    Authors: We agree that the sufficiency result is shown within the generative model of the simulator, where both the beam-SINR labels and the decision thresholds are defined by the same path-loss and blockage rules. The manuscript already notes the simulator-based validation in the abstract and conclusion. We will revise the abstract to explicitly qualify the claim as holding inside this model (e.g., 'We show that, within the generative model, the full multi-BS beam-SINR field is sufficient for finite-codebook threshold-rate decisions...'). This clarification addresses the concern without overstating generalization. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section (performance numbers): the reported 402.5 Mbps rate, 0.0417 outage, and 5.67%/8.35% gains are given without error bars, without exact baseline code or hyper-parameter details, and without quantifying how the compact reference-BS projection (explicitly stated as insufficient for BS association) affects the measured gains; this weakens the empirical support for the sufficiency claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge these limitations in the current presentation. In the revision we will (i) report error bars as standard deviations over multiple simulation seeds, (ii) expand the experimental setup with additional hyper-parameter details and clearer baseline descriptions, and (iii) add an ablation quantifying the performance impact of the compact reference-BS projection versus the full multi-BS field. Exact baseline source code cannot be embedded in the manuscript but will be noted as available upon request. These changes strengthen the empirical support without altering the core results. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Robustness of the sufficiency result against unmodeled propagation effects (diffuse scattering, hardware non-idealities, dynamic multipath) cannot be established from the current simulator-based experiments and would require new validation data or extended modeling.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; simulator validation does not reduce claims to self-definition

full rationale

The paper's central sufficiency claim for the multi-BS beam-SINR field is validated using labels from a compact blockage/path-loss simulator, but the reported metrics (effective rate, outage) arise from end-to-end training of the QuaMoE-DRF model on those labels without any quoted reduction of predictions to fitted parameters, self-citations, or definitional equivalence. No load-bearing self-citation chains, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results appear in the provided text. The derivation remains self-contained against the simulator benchmark.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on the assumption that simulator-generated labels are representative of real propagation dynamics and on the introduction of a quality-aware MoE module whose weighting is motivated by but not derived from inverse-variance fusion.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Compact blockage/path-loss simulator produces labels sufficiently representative for validation of proactive decisions
    Stated in the final sentence of the abstract as the basis for all reported numbers.
invented entities (1)
  • quality-aware mixture-of-experts module no independent evidence
    purpose: Fuse modalities under heteroscedastic errors for joint map and decision prediction
    Introduced as the core fusion mechanism motivated by inverse-variance fusion; no independent evidence provided outside the model itself.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5848 in / 1440 out tokens · 27421 ms · 2026-07-02T05:37:39.361896+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2030 and beyond,

    ITU-R, “Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2030 and beyond,” ITU-R, Rec. ITU-R M.2160-0, Nov. 2023

    2030

  2. [2]

    Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual- functional wireless networks for 6G and beyond,

    F. Liuet al., “Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual- functional wireless networks for 6G and beyond,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1728–1767, 2022

    2022

  3. [3]

    A tutorial on environment-aware communications via channel knowledge map for 6G,

    Y . Zenget al., “A tutorial on environment-aware communications via channel knowledge map for 6G,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1478–1519, 2024

    2024

  4. [4]

    Millimeter-wave cellular wireless networks: Potentials and challenges,

    S. Rangan, T. S. Rappaport, and E. Erkip, “Millimeter-wave cellular wireless networks: Potentials and challenges,”Proc. IEEE, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 366–385, 2014

    2014

  5. [5]

    Overview of millimeter wave communications for fifth-generation (5G) wireless networks: With a focus on propagation models,

    T. S. Rappaportet al., “Overview of millimeter wave communications for fifth-generation (5G) wireless networks: With a focus on propagation models,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 65, no. 12, pp. 6213–6230, Dec. 2017

    2017

  6. [6]

    Massive MIMO for next generation wireless systems,

    E. G. Larsson, O. Edfors, F. Tufvesson, and L. T. Marzetta, “Massive MIMO for next generation wireless systems,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 186–195, Feb. 2014

    2014

  7. [7]

    An overview of massive MIMO: Benefits and challenges,

    L. Luet al., “An overview of massive MIMO: Benefits and challenges,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 742–758, Oct. 2014

    2014

  8. [8]

    An overview of signal processing techniques for millimeter wave MIMO systems,

    R. W. Heathet al., “An overview of signal processing techniques for millimeter wave MIMO systems,”IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 436–453, 2016

    2016

  9. [9]

    A tutorial on beam management for 3GPP NR at mmWave frequencies,

    M. Giordani, M. Polese, M. Mezzavilla, S. Rangan, and M. Zorzi, “A tutorial on beam management for 3GPP NR at mmWave frequencies,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 173–196, 2019

    2019

  10. [10]

    Initial access in millimeter wave cellular systems,

    C. N. Baratiet al., “Initial access in millimeter wave cellular systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 7926–7940, 2016

    2016

  11. [11]

    The impact of mobile blockers on millimeter wave cellular systems,

    I. K. Jain, R. Kumar, and S. S. Panwar, “The impact of mobile blockers on millimeter wave cellular systems,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 854–868, Apr. 2019

    2019

  12. [12]

    Millimeter-wave V2V com- munications: Distributed association and beam alignment,

    C. Perfecto, J. Del Ser, and M. Bennis, “Millimeter-wave V2V com- munications: Distributed association and beam alignment,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 2148–2162, Sep. 2017

    2017

  13. [13]

    Machine learning-based handovers for sub-6 GHz and mmWave integrated vehicular networks,

    L. Yanet al., “Machine learning-based handovers for sub-6 GHz and mmWave integrated vehicular networks,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 4873–4885, 2019

    2019

  14. [14]

    Learning-based handover in mobile millimeter-wave networks,

    S. Khosravi, H. Shokri-Ghadikolaei, and M. Petrova, “Learning-based handover in mobile millimeter-wave networks,”IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 663–674, Jun. 2021

    2021

  15. [15]

    Radar-assisted predictive beamforming for vehicular links: Communication served by sensing,

    F. Liu, W. Yuan, C. Masouros, and J. Yuan, “Radar-assisted predictive beamforming for vehicular links: Communication served by sensing,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 7704–7719, 2020

    2020

  16. [16]

    Beam alignment in mmWave V2X communications: A survey,

    J. Tanet al., “Beam alignment in mmWave V2X communications: A survey,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1676–1709, 2024

    2024

  17. [17]

    Spectrum map and its application in resource management in cognitive radio networks,

    S. Debroy, S. Bhattacharjee, and M. Chatterjee, “Spectrum map and its application in resource management in cognitive radio networks,”IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 406–419, 2015

    2015

  18. [18]

    RadioUNet: Fast radio map estimation with convolutional neural networks,

    R. Levie, C. Yapar, G. Kutyniok, and G. Caire, “RadioUNet: Fast radio map estimation with convolutional neural networks,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 4001–4015, 2021

    2021

  19. [19]

    Toward environment-aware 6G communications via channel knowledge map,

    Y . Zeng and X. Xu, “Toward environment-aware 6G communications via channel knowledge map,”IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 84–91, Jun. 2021

    2021

  20. [20]

    Environment-aware hybrid beamforming by leveraging channel knowledge map,

    D. Wu, Y . Zeng, S. Jin, and R. Zhang, “Environment-aware hybrid beamforming by leveraging channel knowledge map,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 4990–5005, 2024

    2024

  21. [21]

    Prototyping and experimental results for environment- aware millimeter wave beam alignment via channel knowledge map,

    Z. Daiet al., “Prototyping and experimental results for environment- aware millimeter wave beam alignment via channel knowledge map,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 16805–16816, 2024

    2024

  22. [22]

    Radio map-based beamforming assisted with reduced pilots,

    B. Yang, W. Wang, and W. Zhang, “Radio map-based beamforming assisted with reduced pilots,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 8878–8891, 2025

    2025

  23. [23]

    Radiomap inpainting for restricted areas based on propagation priority and depth map,

    S. Zhang, T. Yu, B. Choi, F. Ouyang, and Z. Ding, “Radiomap inpainting for restricted areas based on propagation priority and depth map,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 9330–9344, Aug. 2024

    2024

  24. [24]

    Sparse Gain Radio Map Reconstruction With Geometry Priors and Uncertainty-Guided Measurement Selection

    Z. Zeng, N. Wei, M. B. Mollah, K. Wang, P. L. Yeoh, F. Xu, Y . Xiu, and Z. Zhang, “Sparse Gain Radio Map Reconstruction With Geometry Priors and Uncertainty-Guided Measurement Selection,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.05788, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    GAC-KAN: An Ultra- Lightweight GNSS Interference Classifier for GenAI-Powered Con- sumer Edge Devices,

    Z. Zeng, K. Wang, Z. Zhang, and Y . Xiu, “GAC-KAN: An Ultra- Lightweight GNSS Interference Classifier for GenAI-Powered Con- sumer Edge Devices,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.11186, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  26. [26]

    PhyG-MoE: A Physics-Guided Mixture-of-Experts Framework for Energy-Efficient GNSS Interference Recognition,

    Z. Zeng, Y . Zhao, K. Wang, D. Niyato, Y . Xiu, L. Chen, Z. Zhang, and N. Wei, “PhyG-MoE: A Physics-Guided Mixture-of-Experts Framework for Energy-Efficient GNSS Interference Recognition,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.12798, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    SKANet: A Cognitive Dual-Stream Framework With Adaptive Modality Fusion for Robust Compound GNSS Interference Classification,

    Z. Zeng, Y . Zhao, K. Wang, D. Niyato, H. Shu, J. Zhao, Y . Huang, Y . Xiu, Z. Zhang, and N. Wei, “SKANet: A Cognitive Dual-Stream Framework With Adaptive Modality Fusion for Robust Compound GNSS Interference Classification,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.12791, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    JSR-GFNet: Jamming-to-Signal Ratio-Aware Dynamic Gating for Interference Classification in Future Cognitive Global Navigation Satellite Systems,

    Z. Zeng, H. Shu, K. Wang, L. Chen, A. Hussian, Y . Huang, J. Zhao, Y . Xiu, and Z. Zhang, “JSR-GFNet: Jamming-to-Signal Ratio-Aware Dynamic Gating for Interference Classification in Future Cognitive Global Navigation Satellite Systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.00042, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    Diffraction and scattering aware radio map and environment reconstruction using geometry model-assisted deep learning,

    W. Chen and J. Chen, “Diffraction and scattering aware radio map and environment reconstruction using geometry model-assisted deep learning,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 19804– 19819, Dec. 2024

    2024

  30. [30]

    Aerial video streaming over 3D cellular networks: An environment and channel knowledge map approach,

    C. Zhan, H. Hu, Z. Liu, J. Wang, N. Cheng, and S. Mao, “Aerial video streaming over 3D cellular networks: An environment and channel knowledge map approach,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 1432–1446, Feb. 2024

    2024

  31. [31]

    RME-GAN: A learning framework for radio map estimation based on conditional generative adversarial network,

    S. Zhang, A. Wijesinghe, and Z. Ding, “RME-GAN: A learning framework for radio map estimation based on conditional generative adversarial network,”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 10, no. 20, pp. 18016–18027, Oct. 2023

    2023

  32. [32]

    Denoising diffusion probabilistic model for radio map estimation in generative wireless networks,

    X. Luo, Z. Li, Z. Peng, M. Chen, and Y . Liu, “Denoising diffusion probabilistic model for radio map estimation in generative wireless networks,”IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 751– 763, Apr. 2025

    2025

  33. [33]

    Joint radar and communication design: Applications, state-of-the-art, and the road ahead,

    F. Liu, C. Masouros, A. Li, H. Sun, and L. Hanzo, “Joint radar and communication design: Applications, state-of-the-art, and the road ahead,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 3834–3862, 2020

    2020

  34. [34]

    Enabling joint communication and radar sensing in mobile networks-A survey,

    J. A. Zhanget al., “Enabling joint communication and radar sensing in mobile networks-A survey,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 306–345, 2021

    2021

  35. [35]

    LIDAR data for deep learning-based mmWave beam-selection,

    A. Klautau, N. Gonzalez-Prelcic, and R. W. Heath, “LIDAR data for deep learning-based mmWave beam-selection,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 909–912, Jun. 2019

    2019

  36. [36]

    LiDAR aided future beam prediction in real-world millimeter wave V2I communications,

    S. Jiang, G. Charan, and A. Alkhateeb, “LiDAR aided future beam prediction in real-world millimeter wave V2I communications,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 212–216, Feb. 2023

    2023

  37. [37]

    Computer vision aided mmWave beam alignment in V2X communications,

    W. Xu, F. Gao, X. Tao, J. Zhang, and A. Alkhateeb, “Computer vision aided mmWave beam alignment in V2X communications,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2699–2714, 2022

    2022

  38. [38]

    DeepSense 6G: A large-scale real-world multi- modal sensing and communication dataset,

    A. Alkhateebet al., “DeepSense 6G: A large-scale real-world multi- modal sensing and communication dataset,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 122–128, Sep. 2023

    2023

  39. [39]

    Ma- chine learning-based vision-aided beam selection for mmWave multiuser MISO system,

    H. Ahn, I. Orikumhi, J. Kang, H. Park, H. Jwa, and S. Lee, “Ma- chine learning-based vision-aided beam selection for mmWave multiuser MISO system,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1263– 1267, Jun. 2022. 14

    2022

  40. [40]

    Vision-aided 6G wireless communications: Blockage prediction and proactive handoff,

    G. Charan, M. Alrabeiah, and A. Alkhateeb, “Vision-aided 6G wireless communications: Blockage prediction and proactive handoff,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 10193–10208, 2021

    2021

  41. [41]

    Camera based mmWave beam prediction: Towards multi-candidate real-world scenarios,

    G. Charan, M. Alrabeiah, T. Osman, and A. Alkhateeb, “Camera based mmWave beam prediction: Towards multi-candidate real-world scenarios,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 5109– 5124, 2023

    2023

  42. [42]

    Environment semantics aided wireless communications: A case study of mmWave beam pre- diction and blockage prediction,

    Y . Yang, F. Gao, X. Tao, G. Liu, and C. Pan, “Environment semantics aided wireless communications: A case study of mmWave beam pre- diction and blockage prediction,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 2025–2040, Jul. 2023

    2025

  43. [43]

    Harnessing multimodal sensing for multi-user beamforming in mmWave systems,

    K. Patel and R. W. Heath, “Harnessing multimodal sensing for multi-user beamforming in mmWave systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 18725–18739, Dec. 2024

    2024

  44. [44]

    Multi-modality sensing in mmWave beamforming for connected vehicles using deep learning,

    M. B. Mollah, H. Wang, M. A. Karim, and H. Fang, “Multi-modality sensing in mmWave beamforming for connected vehicles using deep learning,”IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw., vol. 12, pp. 327–341, 2026

    2026

  45. [45]

    Cram ´er–Rao bound optimization for joint radar-communication beamforming,

    F. Liu, Y .-F. Liu, A. Li, C. Masouros, and Y . C. Eldar, “Cram ´er–Rao bound optimization for joint radar-communication beamforming,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 70, pp. 240–253, 2022

    2022

  46. [46]

    MIMO integrated sensing and commu- nication: CRB-rate tradeoff,

    H. Hua, T. X. Han, and J. Xu, “MIMO integrated sensing and commu- nication: CRB-rate tradeoff,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 2839–2854, 2024

    2024

  47. [47]

    Fundamental CRB-rate tradeoff in multi-antenna ISAC systems with information multicasting and multi-target sensing,

    Z. Ren, Y . Peng, X. Song, Y . Fang, L. Qiu, L. Liu, D. W. K. Ng, and J. Xu, “Fundamental CRB-rate tradeoff in multi-antenna ISAC systems with information multicasting and multi-target sensing,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 3870–3885, 2024

    2024