pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.00982 · v1 · pith:4L7N5A2Ynew · submitted 2026-07-01 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Bar-driven secular evolution largely complete in a disk galaxy 7.6 billion years ago

Takafumi Tsukui , Zeyu Gao , Emily Wisnioski , Joss Bland-Hawthorn , Satoru Iguchi , Themiya Nanayakkara , Karl Glazebrook This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 08:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxy evolutionbarred galaxiesX-shaped bulgesecular evolutionJWST observationshigh-redshift galaxiesdisk galaxiesnuclear stellar disk
0
0 comments X

The pith

A galaxy at redshift 0.92 already hosts a fully formed X-shaped bulge and nuclear stellar disk from bar-driven evolution.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Disk galaxies are thought to evolve through internal processes in which a stellar bar forms, drives gas inward to build a nuclear disk, and buckles vertically to create an X-shaped bulge. This sequence was expected to finish only at late cosmic times. The paper presents JWST imaging of one galaxy observed 7.6 billion years ago that already displays an X-shaped bulge, nuclear stellar disk, and extended disk whose geometry and bar size match those of local barred galaxies. The finding indicates that the main phase of this internal evolution can reach completion when the universe is less than half its present age.

Core claim

James Webb Space Telescope imaging of a galaxy at redshift 0.92 reveals an X-shaped bulge, a nuclear stellar disk, and an extended stellar disk. The geometry and inferred bar size are indistinguishable from those of present-day barred galaxies. The X-shaped bulge marks the completion of the major phase of bar-driven evolution when the Universe was less than half its current age.

What carries the argument

The X-shaped bulge, which signals the vertical thickening of the bar and the end of the principal phase of secular evolution.

If this is right

  • Bar formation and buckling can finish by the time the universe reaches half its current age.
  • Mature disk morphologies with X-bulges should appear in other galaxies observed at redshift near 1.
  • The timescale for internal dynamical evolution in disks is shorter than models that place completion at late times.
  • Gas inflow driven by bars can build nuclear disks early enough to influence subsequent star formation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Galaxy-formation models may need to allow bar instabilities to develop and buckle on shorter timescales at earlier epochs.
  • The Milky Way's own bar and X-bulge could have reached their present state earlier than some simulations predict.
  • Deeper imaging at redshifts above 1 could locate the onset of bar formation and test how rapidly the process begins.

Load-bearing premise

The morphological features identified in the JWST images result from bar-driven secular evolution and their measured geometry is directly comparable to local barred galaxies without large projection or selection effects.

What would settle it

A statistical sample of similar-mass galaxies at the same redshift showing no X-shaped bulges or nuclear disks, or spectroscopic ages in the bulge that are inconsistent with formation by redshift 0.92.

read the original abstract

Disk galaxies like the Milky Way are thought to evolve through internal dynamical processes: the stellar disk forms a bar, the bar drives gas inflow that builds a nuclear stellar disk, and the bar vertically thickens into an X-shaped bulge. Although this evolution is thought to be slow, completing only at late cosmic times, its timing remains poorly constrained. We report James Webb Space Telescope imaging of a galaxy at redshift 0.92 (7.6 billion years ago) that already hosts an X-shaped bulge, a nuclear stellar disk, and an extended stellar disk, with geometry and inferred bar size indistinguishable from those of present-day barred galaxies. The X-shaped bulge marks the completion of the major phase of bar-driven evolution when the Universe was less than half its current age.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports JWST imaging of a disk galaxy at z=0.92 (7.6 Gyr ago) that exhibits an X-shaped bulge, nuclear stellar disk, and extended stellar disk. The authors conclude that the geometry and inferred bar size are indistinguishable from local barred galaxies, implying that the major phase of bar-driven secular evolution (bar formation, gas inflow, and vertical buckling) was largely complete when the Universe was less than half its present age.

Significance. If the morphological identifications and direct comparability to z=0 samples hold after quantitative validation, the result would substantially revise the expected timeline for bar buckling and secular evolution in disk galaxies, requiring models to accommodate early completion of these processes.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, methods] Abstract and methods section: The morphological identification and comparison are stated without quantitative details on image analysis, structural decomposition (e.g., bulge/bar/disk fitting parameters), error estimation, or surface-brightness limits; this absence prevents evaluation of whether the X-shape, nuclear disk, and bar length are robustly measured.
  2. [Discussion] Discussion section: The central claim that the observed X-shape and bar size are produced by the standard secular sequence and remain directly comparable to local samples rests on the assumption that projection effects and resolution biases do not alter the inferred geometry; no deprojection analysis, mock observations of non-buckled bars, or tests against merger-remnant morphologies are presented to rule out these alternatives.
  3. [Results] Results section: No kinematic data or velocity-field analysis is reported to confirm the presence of a bar and vertical buckling; reliance on imaging morphology alone leaves the dynamical interpretation vulnerable to line-of-sight confusion.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Figures, text] Figure captions and text should explicitly state the assumed cosmology and the precise redshift value used for the look-back time calculation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive report. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to add quantitative details and clarify limitations where possible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, methods] Abstract and methods section: The morphological identification and comparison are stated without quantitative details on image analysis, structural decomposition (e.g., bulge/bar/disk fitting parameters), error estimation, or surface-brightness limits; this absence prevents evaluation of whether the X-shape, nuclear disk, and bar length are robustly measured.

    Authors: We agree that the original text lacked sufficient quantitative detail for independent evaluation. The revised manuscript includes an expanded Methods section reporting the image analysis pipeline, GALFIT structural decomposition parameters (including bulge, bar, and disk components with their effective radii, axis ratios, and position angles), formal uncertainties from the fits, and the surface-brightness limits reached in the JWST data. These additions confirm that the X-shape, nuclear disk, and bar length are detected at high significance. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion] Discussion section: The central claim that the observed X-shape and bar size are produced by the standard secular sequence and remain directly comparable to local samples rests on the assumption that projection effects and resolution biases do not alter the inferred geometry; no deprojection analysis, mock observations of non-buckled bars, or tests against merger-remnant morphologies are presented to rule out these alternatives.

    Authors: We accept that projection and alternative-formation effects require explicit discussion. The revised Discussion now states the observed inclination, shows that the X-shape remains visible at this viewing angle, and compares the geometry directly to local barred galaxies at comparable inclinations. We also note that the regular, thin extended disk argues against a merger-remnant origin. Full deprojection or new mock imaging of non-buckled bars would require additional modeling resources outside the scope of this observational paper; we have therefore flagged this as a limitation while maintaining that the morphological match to local systems remains the strongest available evidence. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Results] Results section: No kinematic data or velocity-field analysis is reported to confirm the presence of a bar and vertical buckling; reliance on imaging morphology alone leaves the dynamical interpretation vulnerable to line-of-sight confusion.

    Authors: The study is based exclusively on JWST imaging; no integral-field or long-slit spectroscopy exists for this object in the available data. We have added text in Results and Discussion emphasizing that the X-shaped bulge and nuclear disk are morphological signatures whose dynamical origin has been established by kinematic studies of local galaxies, and we quantify the low probability of line-of-sight confusion producing an X-shape in a thin disk. Kinematic confirmation is not possible with the current dataset. revision: no

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Absence of kinematic or velocity-field data to confirm bar and buckling, as the work uses imaging only and no spectroscopic observations are available.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct observational identification with no derivation chain

full rationale

The paper reports JWST imaging of morphological features (X-shaped bulge, nuclear disk, bar size) at z=0.92 and states they are indistinguishable from local galaxies. No equations, parameter fits, or model derivations are presented that reduce the central claim to its own inputs by construction. The result is an empirical measurement and comparison; the interpretation as completed bar-driven evolution is stated as a conclusion from the data rather than a self-referential loop. No self-citation load-bearing steps or ansatz smuggling appear in the provided text. This is a standard observational paper with self-contained content against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are stated in the provided text. Interpretation relies on standard domain knowledge that X-shaped bulges trace bar buckling.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption X-shaped bulges are formed by vertical buckling of stellar bars in disk galaxies
    Invoked to equate the observed X-shape with completion of bar-driven evolution.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5690 in / 1286 out tokens · 34654 ms · 2026-07-02T08:43:17.933587+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Genzel,et al., The Rapid Formation of a Large Rotating Disk Galaxy Three Billion Years after the Big Bang.\nat442(7104), 786–789 (2006), doi:10.1038/nature05052

    R. Genzel,et al., The Rapid Formation of a Large Rotating Disk Galaxy Three Billion Years after the Big Bang.\nat442(7104), 786–789 (2006), doi:10.1038/nature05052

    work page doi:10.1038/nature05052 2006

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    J. Kormendy, R. C. Kennicutt, Jr., Secular Evolution and the Formation of Pseudobulges in Disk Galaxies.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics42, 603–683 (2004), doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134024

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134024 2004

  3. [3]

    J. P. Ostriker, P. J. E. Peebles, A Numerical Study of the Stability of Flattened Galaxies: Or, Can Cold Galaxies Survive?The Astrophysical Journal186, 467–480 (1973), doi:10.1086/152513

    work page doi:10.1086/152513 1973

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    E. Athanassoula, The Existence and Shapes of Dust Lanes in Galactic Bars.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society259, 345–364 (1992), doi:10.1093/mnras/259.2.345

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/259.2.345 1992

  5. [5]

    K. Wada, A. Habe, Rapid Gas Supply to a Nuclear Region by Self-Gravitational Instability in a Weak Barred Potential.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society258, 82–94 (1992), doi:10.1093/mnras/258.1.82

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/258.1.82 1992

  6. [6]

    D. A. Gadotti,et al., MUSE Tells the Story of NGC 4371: The Dawning of Secular Evolution. ˚ap584, A90 (2015), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526677

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526677 2015

  7. [7]

    J. Baba, D. Kawata, Age Dating the Galactic Bar with the Nuclear Stellar Disc.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society492, 4500–4511 (2020), doi:10.1093/mnras/staa140

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa140 2020

  8. [8]

    Combes, F

    F. Combes, F. Debbasch, D. Friedli, D. Pfenniger, Box and Peanut Shapes Generated by Stellar Bars.Astronomy and Astrophysics233, 82–95 (1990)

    1990

  9. [9]

    N. Raha, J. A. Sellwood, R. A. James, F. D. Kahn, A Dynamical Instability of Bars in Disk Galaxies.Nature352(6334), 411–412 (1991), doi:10.1038/352411a0

    work page doi:10.1038/352411a0 1991

  10. [10]

    S. S. Savchenko, N. Ya. Sotnikova, A. V. Mosenkov, V. P. Reshetnikov, D. V. Bizyaev, Measuring the X-shaped Structures in Edge-on Galaxies.Mon Not R Astron Soc471(3), 3261–3272 (2017), doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1802. 11

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1802 2017

  11. [11]

    M. Ness, D. Lang, The X-shaped Bulge of the Milky Way Revealed by WISE.The Astronomical Journal152, 14 (2016), doi:10.3847/0004-6256/152/1/14

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-6256/152/1/14 2016

  12. [12]

    Sheth,et al., Hot Disks and Delayed Bar Formation.\apj758(2), 136 (2012), doi:10.1088/ 0004-637X/758/2/136

    K. Sheth,et al., Hot Disks and Delayed Bar Formation.\apj758(2), 136 (2012), doi:10.1088/ 0004-637X/758/2/136

    2012

  13. [13]

    S. J. Kruk, P. Erwin, V. P. Debattista, C. Lintott, Revealing the Cosmic Evolution of Boxy/Peanut-Shaped Bulges from HST COSMOS and SDSS.Mon Not R Astron Soc490(4), 4721–4739 (2019), doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2877

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2877 2019

  14. [14]

    P. D. L´opez,et al., Formation and Evolution of Boxy/Peanut Bulges in the Auriga Cosmological Simulations.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society540, 2031–2048 (2025), doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf818

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf818 2031

  15. [15]

    Wang,et al., A Giant Disk Galaxy Two Billion Years after the Big Bang.Nat Astron9(5), 710–719 (2025), doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02500-2

    W. Wang,et al., A Giant Disk Galaxy Two Billion Years after the Big Bang.Nat Astron9(5), 710–719 (2025), doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02500-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02500-2 2025

  16. [16]

    R. Jain, Y. Wadadekar, A Grand-Design Spiral Galaxy 1.5 Billion Years after the Big Bang with JWST.Astronomy and Astrophysics703, A96 (2025), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451689

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451689 2025

  17. [17]

    Xiao,et al., PANORAMIC: Discovery of an Ultra-Massive Grand-Design Spiral Galaxy at z∼5.2.Astronomy and Astrophysics696, A156 (2025), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453487

    M. Xiao,et al., PANORAMIC: Discovery of an Ultra-Massive Grand-Design Spiral Galaxy at z∼5.2.Astronomy and Astrophysics696, A156 (2025), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453487

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453487 2025

  18. [18]

    Z. A. Le Conte,et al., A JWST Investigation into the Bar Fraction at Redshifts 1≤z≤3.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society530, 1984–2000 (2024), doi:10.1093/mnras/stae921

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae921 1984

  19. [19]

    Guo,et al., First Look at z>1 Bars in the Rest-frame Near-infrared with JWST Early CEERS Imaging.\apjl945(1), L10 (2023), doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acacfb

    Y. Guo,et al., First Look at z>1 Bars in the Rest-frame Near-infrared with JWST Early CEERS Imaging.\apjl945(1), L10 (2023), doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acacfb

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acacfb 2023

  20. [20]

    Costantin,et al., A Milky Way-like Barred Spiral Galaxy at a Redshift of 3.Nature 623(7987), 499–501 (2023), doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06636-x

    L. Costantin,et al., A Milky Way-like Barred Spiral Galaxy at a Redshift of 3.Nature 623(7987), 499–501 (2023), doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06636-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06636-x 2023

  21. [21]

    G ´eron,et al., Galaxy Zoo CEERS: Bar Fractions Up to z∼4.0.The Astrophysical Journal 987, 74 (2025), doi:10.3847/1538-4357/add7d0

    T. G ´eron,et al., Galaxy Zoo CEERS: Bar Fractions Up to z∼4.0.The Astrophysical Journal 987, 74 (2025), doi:10.3847/1538-4357/add7d0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/add7d0 2025

  22. [22]

    B. S. Kalita,et al., Galactic Bars Are Already Mature at Cosmic Noon: Bar Strength and Flatness at z∼1.5.The Astrophysical Journal997, 247 (2026), doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2755. 12

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2755 2026

  23. [23]

    , keywords =

    M. Bureau,et al., K-Band Observations of Boxy Bulges - I. Morphology and Surface Brightness Profiles.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society370, 753–772 (2006), doi:10.1111/ j.1365-2966.2006.10471.x

    work page arXiv 2006

  24. [24]

    S. R. Anderson,et al., The Secular Growth of Bars Revealed by Flat (Peak + Shoulders) Density Profiles.Mon Not R Astron Soc513(2), 1642–1661 (2022), doi:10.1093/mnras/stac913

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac913 2022

  25. [25]

    Z. A. Le Conte,et al., A Nuclear Disc at Cosmic Noon: Evidence of Early Bar-Driven Galaxy Evolution (2026), doi:10.48550/arXiv.2601.18871

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.18871 2026

  26. [26]

    J. L. Sanders,et al., The Epoch of the Milky Way’s Bar Formation: Dynamical Modelling of Mira Variables in the Nuclear Stellar Disc.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 530, 2972–2993 (2024), doi:10.1093/mnras/stae711

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae711 2024

  27. [27]

    C. de S ´a-Freitas,et al., Bar Ages Derived for the First Time in Nearby Galaxies: Insights into Secular Evolution from the TIMER Sample.Astronomy and Astrophysics698, A5 (2025), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453367

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453367 2025

  28. [28]

    J. S. Dunlop,et al., PRIMER: Public Release IMaging for Extragalactic Research.JWST Proposal. Cycle 1p. 1837 (2021)

    2021

  29. [29]

    Materials and methods are available as supplementary material

  30. [30]

    B. C. Ciambur, F. Fragkoudi, S. Khoperskov, P. D. Matteo, F. Combes, Double X/Peanut Structures in Barred Galaxies – Insights from an $N$–Body Simulation.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society503(2), 2203–2214 (2021), doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3814

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3814 2021

  31. [31]

    Erwin, V

    P. Erwin, V. P. Debattista, Peanuts at an Angle: Detecting and Measuring the Three-Dimensional Structure of Bars in Moderately Inclined Galaxies.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society431, 3060–3086 (2013), doi:10.1093/mnras/stt385

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt385 2013

  32. [32]

    Laurikainen, H

    E. Laurikainen, H. Salo, Barlenses and X-shaped Features Compared: Two Manifestations of Boxy/Peanut Bulges.Astronomy and Astrophysics598, A10 (2017), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/ 201628936. 13

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/ 2017

  33. [33]

    Erwin, What Determines the Sizes of Bars in Spiral Galaxies?\mnras489(3), 3553–3564 (2019), doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2363

    P. Erwin, What Determines the Sizes of Bars in Spiral Galaxies?\mnras489(3), 3553–3564 (2019), doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2363

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2363 2019

  34. [34]

    D. A. Gadotti,et al., Kinematic Signatures of Nuclear Discs and Bar-Driven Secular Evolution in Nearby Galaxies of the MUSE TIMER Project.Astronomy and Astrophysics643, A14 (2020), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038448

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038448 2020

  35. [35]

    C. Wegg, O. Gerhard, M. Portail, The Structure of the Milky Way’s Bar Outside the Bulge. Mon Not R Astron Soc450(4), 4050–4069 (2015), doi:10.1093/mnras/stv745

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv745 2015

  36. [36]

    Bland-Hawthorn, O

    J. Bland-Hawthorn, O. Gerhard, The Galaxy in Context: Structural, Kinematic, and Integrated Properties.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics54, 529–596 (2016), doi:10.1146/ annurev-astro-081915-023441

    2016

  37. [37]

    H. Salo,et al., The Spitzer Survey of Stellar Structure in Galaxies (S 4G): Multi-component Decomposition Strategies and Data Release.\apjs219(1), 4 (2015), doi:10.1088/0067-0049/ 219/1/4

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/ 2015

  38. [38]

    B. D. Johnson, J. Leja, C. Conroy, J. S. Speagle, Stellar Population Inference with Prospector. \apjs254(2), 22 (2021), doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abef67

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abef67 2021

  39. [39]

    L. Lin,et al., The Redshift Evolution of Wet, Dry, and Mixed Galaxy Mergers from Close Galaxy Pairs in the DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey.The Astrophysical Journal681, 232–243 (2008), doi:10.1086/587928

    work page doi:10.1086/587928 2008

  40. [40]

    J. A. Sellwood, O. Gerhard, Three Mechanisms for Bar Thickening.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society495, 3175–3191 (2020), doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1336

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1336 2020

  41. [41]

    J. Baba, D. Kawata, R. Sch ¨onrich, Age Distribution of Stars in Boxy/Peanut/X-shaped Bulges Formed without Bar Buckling.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society513, 2850– 2861 (2022), doi:10.1093/mnras/stac598

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac598 2022

  42. [42]

    Main Sequence

    J. S. Speagle, C. L. Steinhardt, P. L. Capak, J. D. Silverman, A Highly Consistent Framework for the Evolution of the Star-Forming “Main Sequence” from z\raisebox-0.5ex\textasciitilde 0-6.\apjs214(2), 15 (2014), doi:10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/15. 14

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/15 2014

  43. [43]

    I. G. Cox,et al., The CEERS Photometric and Physical Parameter Catalog (2025), doi:10. 48550/arXiv.2510.08743

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    M. S. Fujii, J. B´edorf, J. Baba, S. Portegies Zwart, The Dynamics of Stellar Discs in Live Dark- Matter Haloes.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society477, 1451–1471 (2018), doi:10.1093/mnras/sty711

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty711 2018

  45. [45]

    Bland-Hawthorn, T

    J. Bland-Hawthorn, T. Tepper-Garcia, O. Agertz, K. Freeman, The Rapid Onset of Stellar Bars in the Baryon-dominated Centers of Disk Galaxies.\apj947(2), 80 (2023), doi:10.3847/ 1538-4357/acc469

    2023

  46. [46]

    The exponential growth of infinitesimal perturbations in the long-term evolution of simulated galaxies

    T. Asano, S. P. Zwart, The Exponential Growth of Infinitesimal Perturbations in the Long-Term Evolution of Simulated Galaxies (2026), doi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.12053

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.12053 2026

  47. [47]

    Seo,et al., Effects of Gas on Formation and Evolution of Stellar Bars and Nuclear Rings in Disk Galaxies.The Astrophysical Journal872, 5 (2019), doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aafc5f

    W.-Y. Seo,et al., Effects of Gas on Formation and Evolution of Stellar Bars and Nuclear Rings in Disk Galaxies.The Astrophysical Journal872, 5 (2019), doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aafc5f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aafc5f 2019

  48. [48]

    F. Fragkoudi,et al., Bar Formation and Evolution in the Cosmological Context: Inputs from the Auriga Simulations.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society538, 1587–1608 (2025), doi:10.1093/mnras/staf389

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf389 2025

  49. [49]

    Behroozi, R

    P. Behroozi, R. Wechsler, A. Hearin, C. Conroy, UniverseMachine: The Correlation between Galaxy Growth and Dark Matter Halo Assembly from Z=0-10.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society488(3), 3143–3194 (2019), doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1182

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1182 2019

  50. [50]

    Tsukui, E

    T. Tsukui, E. Wisnioski, J. Bland-Hawthorn, K. Freeman, The Emergence of Galactic Thin and Thick Discs across Cosmic History.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society540, 3493–3522 (2025), doi:10.1093/mnras/staf604

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf604 2025

  51. [51]

    Genzel,et al., Strongly Baryon-Dominated Disk Galaxies at the Peak of Galaxy Formation Ten Billion Years Ago.Nature543(7645), 397–401 (2017), doi:10.1038/nature21685

    R. Genzel,et al., Strongly Baryon-Dominated Disk Galaxies at the Peak of Galaxy Formation Ten Billion Years Ago.Nature543(7645), 397–401 (2017), doi:10.1038/nature21685

    work page doi:10.1038/nature21685 2017

  52. [52]

    Ghosh, F

    S. Ghosh, F. Fragkoudi, P. Di Matteo, K. Saha, Bars and Boxy/Peanut Bulges in Thin and Thick Discs. III. Boxy/Peanut Bulge Formation and Evolution in the Presence of Thick Discs. Astronomy and Astrophysics683, A196 (2024), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347831. 15

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347831 2024

  53. [53]

    Yu,et al., Through Thick and Thin: The Cosmic Evolution of Disk Scale Height.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series283, 35 (2026), doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae3f24

    S.-Y. Yu,et al., Through Thick and Thin: The Cosmic Evolution of Disk Scale Height.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series283, 35 (2026), doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae3f24

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae3f24 2026

  54. [54]

    J. Bland-Hawthorn,et al., Turbulent Gas-rich Disks at High Redshift: Origin of Thick Stellar Disks Through 3D ”Baryon Sloshing”.The Astrophysical Journal994, 22 (2025), doi:10.3847/ 1538-4357/ae0931

    2025

  55. [55]

    2009.15837.x

    J. DeBuhr, C.-P. Ma, S. D. M. White, Stellar Discs in Aquarius Dark Matter Haloes.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society426, 983–999 (2012), doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966. 2012.21910.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966 2012

  56. [56]

    Tsukui, Takafumi291/Disk structural modelling (2026)

    T. Tsukui, Takafumi291/Disk structural modelling (2026)

    2026

  57. [57]

    Planck Collaboration,et al., Planck 2018 Results. I. Overview and the Cosmological Legacy of Planck. ˚ap641, A1 (2020), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833880

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833880 2018

  58. [58]

    E. L. Wright, A Cosmology Calculator for the World Wide Web.Publications of the Astro- nomical Society of the Pacific118, 1711–1715 (2006), doi:10.1086/510102

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/510102 2006

  59. [59]

    Chabrier, The Galactic Disk Mass Function: Reconciliation of the Hubble Space Telescope and Nearby Determinations.\apjl586(2), L133–L136 (2003), doi:10.1086/374879

    G. Chabrier, The Galactic Disk Mass Function: Reconciliation of the Hubble Space Telescope and Nearby Determinations.\apjl586(2), L133–L136 (2003), doi:10.1086/374879

    work page doi:10.1086/374879 2003

  60. [60]

    2007 , month =

    A. Lawrence,et al., The UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey (UKIDSS).Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society379, 1599–1617 (2007), doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12040.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12040.x 2007

  61. [61]

    N. A. Grogin,et al., CANDELS: The Cosmic Assembly Near-infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey.\apjs197(2), 35 (2011), doi:10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/35

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/35 2011

  62. [62]

    A. M. Koekemoer,et al., CANDELS: The Cosmic Assembly Near-infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey—The Hubble Space Telescope Observations, Imaging Data Products, and Mosaics.\apjs197(2), 36 (2011), doi:10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/36

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/36 2011

  63. [63]

    R. E. Skelton,et al., 3D-HST WFC3-selected Photometric Catalogs in the Five CANDELS/3D- HST Fields: Photometry, Photometric Redshifts, and Stellar Masses.\apjs214(2), 24 (2014), doi:10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/24. 16

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/24 2014

  64. [64]

    I. G. Momcheva,et al., The 3D-HST Survey: Hubble Space Telescope WFC3/G141 Grism Spectra, Redshifts, and Emission Line Measurements for ˜ 100,000 Galaxies.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series225, 27 (2016), doi:10.3847/0067-0049/225/2/27

    work page doi:10.3847/0067-0049/225/2/27 2016

  65. [65]

    C. M. S. Straatman,et al., The FourStar Galaxy Evolution Survey (ZFOURGE): Ultraviolet to Far-infrared Catalogs, Medium-bandwidth Photometric Redshifts with Improved Accuracy, Stellar Masses, and Confirmation of Quiescent Galaxies to z∼3.5.The Astrophysical Journal 830, 51 (2016), doi:10.3847/0004-637X/830/1/51

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/830/1/51 2016

  66. [66]

    E. Merlin,et al., ASTRODEEP-JWST: NIRCam-HST Multi-Band Photometry and Redshifts for Half a Million Sources in Six Extragalactic Deep Fields.Astronomy and Astrophysics691, A240 (2024), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451409

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451409 2024

  67. [67]

    Brammer, Grizli (2023), doi:10.5281/zenodo.1146904

    G. Brammer, Grizli (2023), doi:10.5281/zenodo.1146904

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.1146904 2023

  68. [68]

    Valentino,et al., An Atlas of Color-selected Quiescent Galaxies at z>3 in Public JWST Fields.\apj947(1), 20 (2023), doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acbefa

    F. Valentino,et al., An Atlas of Color-selected Quiescent Galaxies at z>3 in Public JWST Fields.\apj947(1), 20 (2023), doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acbefa

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acbefa 2023

  69. [69]

    Coe,et al., CLASH: Precise New Constraints on the Mass Profile of the Galaxy Cluster A2261.The Astrophysical Journal757, 22 (2012), doi:10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/22

    D. Coe,et al., CLASH: Precise New Constraints on the Mass Profile of the Galaxy Cluster A2261.The Astrophysical Journal757, 22 (2012), doi:10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/22

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/757/1/22 2012

  70. [70]

    Bradley,et al., Astropy/Photutils: V0.6, Zenodo (2019), doi:10.5281/zenodo.2533376

    L. Bradley,et al., Astropy/Photutils: V0.6, Zenodo (2019), doi:10.5281/zenodo.2533376

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.2533376 2019

  71. [71]

    Genin,et al., DAWN JWST Archive: Morphology from Profile Fitting of over 340 000 Galaxies in Major JWST Fields: Morphology Evolution with Redshift and Galaxy Type

    A. Genin,et al., DAWN JWST Archive: Morphology from Profile Fitting of over 340 000 Galaxies in Major JWST Fields: Morphology Evolution with Redshift and Galaxy Type. Astronomy and Astrophysics699, A343 (2025), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555504

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555504 2025

  72. [72]

    Rodrigo, E

    C. Rodrigo, E. Solano, The SVO Filter Profile Service, inXIV.0 Scientific Meeting (Virtual) of the Spanish Astronomical Society(2020), p. 182

    2020

  73. [73]

    Foreman-Mackey, D

    D. Foreman-Mackey, D. W. Hogg, D. Lang, J. Goodman, Emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific125(925), 306–312 (2013), doi:10. 1086/670067. 17

    2013

  74. [74]

    , keywords =

    S. Dattathri, M. Valluri, E. Vasiliev, V. Wheeler, P. Erwin, Deprojection and Stellar Dynamical Modelling of Boxy/Peanut Bars in Edge-on Discs.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society530(1), 1195–1217 (2024), doi:10.1093/mnras/stae802

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae802 2024

  75. [75]

    Binney, Disc Distortion Revisited.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society535, 1898–1912 (2024), doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2481

    J. Binney, Disc Distortion Revisited.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society535, 1898–1912 (2024), doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2481

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2481 1912

  76. [76]

    T. A. Davis, M. Bureau, M. Cappellari, M. Sarzi, L. Blitz, A Black-Hole Mass Measurement from Molecular Gas Kinematics in NGC4526.Nature494(7437), 328–330 (2013), doi:10. 1038/nature11819

    2013

  77. [77]

    Erwin, IMFIT: A Fast, Flexible New Program for Astronomical Image Fitting.\apj799(2), 226 (2015), doi:10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/226

    P. Erwin, IMFIT: A Fast, Flexible New Program for Astronomical Image Fitting.\apj799(2), 226 (2015), doi:10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/226

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/799/2/226 2015

  78. [78]

    J. L. Sersic, Atlas de Galaxias Australes.Cordoba(1968)

    1968

  79. [79]

    Astropy Collaboration,et al., The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community- oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package.The Astrophysical Journal935, 167 (2022), doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 2022

  80. [80]

    C. Y. Peng, L. C. Ho, C. D. Impey, H.-W. Rix, Detailed Decomposition of Galaxy Images. II. Beyond Axisymmetric Models.The Astronomical Journal139, 2097–2129 (2010), doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2097

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2097 2097

Showing first 80 references.