pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.01333 · v1 · pith:N2GZ27LKnew · submitted 2026-07-01 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO

Axion Misalignment Across First-Order Phase Transitions

Galymzhan Baltabay , Francesco D'Eramo , Ville Vaskonen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 19:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.CO
keywords axion dark mattermisalignment mechanismfirst-order phase transitionrelic densitybubble misalignmentisocurvature perturbationsminiclusters
0
0 comments X

The pith

When axion mass turns on only inside expanding bubbles during a first-order phase transition, misalignment production splits into regimes that enhance or suppress the dark matter relic density.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that standard axion misalignment is qualitatively changed when the mass becomes non-vanishing only inside true-vacuum bubbles. Lattice simulations in an expanding universe identify two regimes: rapid transitions delay oscillations until bubble percolation and raise the relic abundance, while slower transitions generate spatial gradients that reduce the effective misalignment angle. A semi-analytical expression unifies both cases, matches the simulations, and shows downstream effects on isocurvature perturbations and the small-scale matter power spectrum.

Core claim

When the axion mass is generated during a first-order phase transition and becomes non-vanishing only inside expanding true-vacuum bubbles, the standard picture of misalignment production is qualitatively modified. For rapid transitions the onset of oscillations is delayed until bubble percolation, enhancing the relic abundance. For slower transitions spatial gradients generated by expanding bubbles suppress the effective misalignment angle through the bubble misalignment mechanism. A semi-analytical expression for the relic density provides a unified description of both regimes and accurately reproduces the simulation results, while also modifying isocurvature perturbations and the small-sc

What carries the argument

Bubble misalignment mechanism, in which expanding bubbles generate spatial gradients that suppress the effective misalignment angle, together with delayed oscillations until percolation when mass activates only inside bubbles.

If this is right

  • Rapid transitions enhance relic abundance via delayed oscillations until percolation.
  • Slower transitions suppress relic abundance via spatial gradients from expanding bubbles.
  • Isocurvature perturbations are modified by the same mechanism.
  • The small-scale matter power spectrum changes, affecting axion minicluster formation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Axion dark matter parameter space may need re-evaluation in models featuring first-order transitions.
  • Distinct signatures in structure formation could appear in future surveys due to the altered power spectrum.
  • The semi-analytical formula enables rapid parameter scans without repeated full simulations.

Load-bearing premise

The axion mass becomes non-vanishing only inside expanding true-vacuum bubbles during the first-order phase transition.

What would settle it

A lattice simulation in which the axion mass turns on uniformly rather than only inside bubbles and still produces the reported enhancement or suppression would falsify the claim that bubble confinement drives the modification.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.01333 by Francesco D'Eramo, Galymzhan Baltabay, Ville Vaskonen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Evolution of the false-vacuum fraction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Spatially averaged axion energy density as a func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Anharmonic correction factor for delayed misalign [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Evolution of the axion shock-wave profile for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Geometric quantities entering the semi-analytic model for bubble misalignment. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Normalized average axion comoving energy density as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Global fit of the semi-analytic model ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Decay constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Constraints for the post-inflationary case in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Constraints for the pre-inflationary stochastic case [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Pre-inflationary isocurvature constraints for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Validation of the lattice simulations in the homogeneous limit. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

When the axion mass is generated during a first-order phase transition and becomes non-vanishing only inside expanding true-vacuum bubbles, the standard picture of misalignment production is qualitatively modified. Using lattice simulations in an expanding universe, we study dark matter production within such a framework and identify two distinct regimes. For rapid transitions, the onset of oscillations is delayed until bubble percolation, enhancing the relic abundance. For slower transitions, spatial gradients generated by expanding bubbles suppress the effective misalignment angle through the bubble misalignment mechanism. We derive a semi-analytical expression for the relic density that provides a unified description of both regimes and accurately reproduces the simulation results. Finally, we show how this mechanism also modifies isocurvature perturbations and the small-scale matter power spectrum, with important implications for axion minicluster formation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that when the axion mass turns on exclusively inside expanding true-vacuum bubbles during a first-order phase transition, the standard misalignment mechanism is qualitatively altered. Lattice simulations in an expanding background reveal two regimes: rapid transitions delay the onset of oscillations until percolation (enhancing relic density), while slower transitions generate spatial gradients that suppress the effective misalignment angle via a 'bubble misalignment' effect. A semi-analytical relic-density formula is derived that unifies both regimes and reproduces the numerical results; the work also examines consequences for isocurvature perturbations and the small-scale matter power spectrum.

Significance. If the central premise holds, the mechanism offers a qualitatively new channel for axion dark-matter production whose relic density can be either enhanced or suppressed relative to the standard misalignment picture, with direct implications for minicluster formation and isocurvature constraints. The combination of expanding-universe lattice simulations and a unified semi-analytical expression constitutes a concrete, falsifiable advance within the stated framework.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that the semi-analytical expression 'accurately reproduces the simulation results,' but the manuscript should explicitly state the fitting procedure, the range of parameters over which agreement holds, and whether any parameters are tuned to the same runs (to address potential circularity concerns).
  2. Clarify the precise definition of 'rapid' versus 'slow' transitions (e.g., in terms of the ratio of bubble wall velocity to the Hubble rate or the duration of the transition relative to the axion oscillation timescale) so that the two regimes can be unambiguously identified in the text and figures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, accurate summary of the results, and recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The provided abstract and context describe lattice simulations in an expanding universe that identify two regimes of axion production, followed by derivation of a semi-analytical relic-density expression that reproduces the simulation results. No quotes or equations are available showing self-definition (e.g., a quantity defined in terms of itself), a fitted parameter from the same data renamed as a prediction, or load-bearing self-citations whose content reduces to the target result. The central premise is stated explicitly as an input assumption about the axion mass, and the simulations plus analytic formula are presented as independent validation steps. This is the normal case of a self-contained numerical-plus-analytic study with no reduction by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified from the abstract alone.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5665 in / 1094 out tokens · 25285 ms · 2026-07-03T19:42:28.858095+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · 17 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. Lett.38, 1440 (1977)

    1977

  2. [2]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. D16, 1791 17 (1977)

    1977

  3. [3]

    Wilczek, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 279 (1978)

    1978

  4. [4]

    Weinberg, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 223 (1978)

    1978

  5. [5]

    Chikashige, R

    Y. Chikashige, R. N. Mohapatra, and R. D. Peccei, Phys. Lett. B98, 265 (1981)

    1981

  6. [6]

    Axions In String Theory

    P. Svrcek and E. Witten, JHEP06, 051 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0605206

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  7. [7]

    String Axiverse

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper, and J. March-Russell, Phys. Rev. D81, 123530 (2010), arXiv:0905.4720 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  8. [8]

    The type IIB string axiverse and its low-energy phenomenology

    M. Cicoli, M. Goodsell, and A. Ringwald, JHEP10, 146 (2012), arXiv:1206.0819 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  9. [9]

    Preskill, M

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek, Phys. Lett. B 120, 127 (1983)

    1983

  10. [10]

    L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, Phys. Lett. B120, 133 (1983)

    1983

  11. [11]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler, Phys. Lett. B120, 137 (1983)

    1983

  12. [12]

    Particle Dark Matter: Evidence, Candidates and Constraints

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, Phys. Rept.405, 279 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0404175

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  13. [13]

    Dark Matter

    M. Cirelli, A. Strumia, and J. Zupan, (2024), arXiv:2406.01705 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D33, 889 (1986)

    1986

  15. [15]

    Sikivie, Lect

    P. Sikivie, Lect. Notes Phys.741, 19 (2008), arXiv:astro- ph/0610440

    work page arXiv 2008

  16. [16]

    D. J. E. Marsh, Phys. Rept.643, 1 (2016), arXiv:1510.07633 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  17. [17]

    Vilenkin and A

    A. Vilenkin and A. E. Everett, Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1867 (1982)

    1982

  18. [18]

    T. W. B. Kibble, Nucl. Phys. B252, 227 (1985), [Erra- tum: Nucl.Phys.B 261, 750 (1985)]

    1985

  19. [19]

    Harari and P

    D. Harari and P. Sikivie, Phys. Lett. B195, 361 (1987)

    1987

  20. [20]

    E. P. S. Shellard, Nucl. Phys. B283, 624 (1987)

    1987

  21. [21]

    Hagmann and P

    C. Hagmann and P. Sikivie, Nucl. Phys. B363, 247 (1991)

    1991

  22. [22]

    R. A. Battye and E. P. S. Shellard, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 2954 (1994), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 76, 2203–2204 (1996)], arXiv:astro-ph/9403018

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  23. [23]

    Kawasaki, T

    M. Kawasaki, T. Sekiguchi, M. Yamaguchi, and J. Yokoyama, PTEP2018, 091E01 (2018), arXiv:1806.05566 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2018

  24. [24]

    Axions from Strings: the Attractive Solution

    M. Gorghetto, E. Hardy, and G. Villadoro, JHEP07, 151 (2018), arXiv:1806.04677 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    Buschmann, J

    M. Buschmann, J. W. Foster, and B. R. Safdi, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 161103 (2020), arXiv:1906.00967 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    Hindmarsh, J

    M. Hindmarsh, J. Lizarraga, A. Lopez-Eiguren, and J. Urrestilla, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 021301 (2020), arXiv:1908.03522 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    Gorghetto, E

    M. Gorghetto, E. Hardy, and G. Villadoro, SciPost Phys. 10, 050 (2021), arXiv:2007.04990 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Buschmann, J

    M. Buschmann, J. W. Foster, A. Hook, A. Peterson, D. E. Willcox, W. Zhang, and B. R. Safdi, Nature Com- mun.13, 1049 (2022), arXiv:2108.05368 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  29. [29]

    H. Kim, J. Park, and M. Son, JHEP07, 150 (2024), arXiv:2402.00741 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Kim and M

    H. Kim and M. Son, JHEP07, 052 (2025), arXiv:2411.08455 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    J. N. Benabou, M. Buschmann, J. W. Foster, and B. R. Safdi, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 241003 (2025), arXiv:2412.08699 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Hindmarsh, Phys

    M. Hindmarsh, Phys. Rev. D45, 1130 (1992)

    1992

  33. [33]

    Nakagawa, F

    S. Nakagawa, F. Takahashi, M. Yamada, and W. Yin, Phys. Lett. B839, 137824 (2023), arXiv:2210.10022 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    J. Lee, K. Murai, F. Takahashi, and W. Yin, JCAP05, 122 (2024), arXiv:2402.09501 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Carenza, J

    P. Carenza, J. Eby, O. Iarygina, and M. C. D. Marsh, JHEP09, 023 (2024), arXiv:2407.01676 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Garcia Garcia and R

    I. Garcia Garcia and R. Petrossian-Byrne, JHEP04, 189 (2025), arXiv:2407.09603 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    D. H. Lyth, Phys. Rev. D45, 3394 (1992)

    1992

  38. [38]

    K. J. Bae, J.-H. Huh, and J. E. Kim, JCAP09, 005 (2008), arXiv:0806.0497 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  39. [39]

    Visinelli and P

    L. Visinelli and P. Gondolo, Phys. Rev. D80, 035024 (2009), arXiv:0903.4377 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2009

  40. [40]

    S. R. Coleman, Phys. Rev. D15, 2929 (1977), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 16, 1248 (1977)]

    1977

  41. [41]

    C. G. Callan, Jr. and S. R. Coleman, Phys. Rev. D16, 1762 (1977)

    1977

  42. [42]

    A. D. Linde, Nucl. Phys. B216, 421 (1983), [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 223, 544 (1983)]

    1983

  43. [43]

    M. S. Turner, E. J. Weinberg, and L. M. Widrow, Phys. Rev. D46, 2384 (1992)

    1992

  44. [44]

    Lewicki, P

    M. Lewicki, P. Toczek, and V. Vaskonen, Phys. Dark Univ.50, 102075 (2025), arXiv:2412.10366 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    The Growth of Bubbles in Cosmological Phase Transitions

    J. Ignatius, K. Kajantie, H. Kurki-Suonio, and M. Laine, Phys. Rev. D49, 3854 (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9309059

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  46. [46]

    G. D. Moore and T. Prokopec, Phys. Rev. D52, 7182 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9506475

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  47. [47]

    Electroweak Bubble Wall Speed Limit

    D. Bodeker and G. D. Moore, JCAP05, 025 (2017), arXiv:1703.08215 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  48. [48]

    Krajewski, M

    T. Krajewski, M. Lewicki, M. Vasar, V. Vaskonen, H. Veerm¨ ae, and M. Zych, JHEP03, 178 (2025), arXiv:2411.15094 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Ekstedt, O

    A. Ekstedt, O. Gould, J. Hirvonen, B. Laurent, L. Niemi, P. Schicho, and J. van de Vis, JHEP04, 101 (2025), arXiv:2411.04970 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    A. H. Guth and E. J. Weinberg, Nucl. Phys. B212, 321 (1983)

    1983

  51. [51]

    D. G. Figueroa, A. Florio, F. Torrenti, and W. Valken- burg, Comput. Phys. Commun.283, 108586 (2023), arXiv:2102.01031 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  53. [53]

    Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Phys

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  54. [54]

    Lewicki and V

    M. Lewicki and V. Vaskonen, (2025), arXiv:2511.15687 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Vilenkin and E

    A. Vilenkin and E. P. S. Shellard,Cosmic Strings and Other Topological Defects(Cambridge University Press, 2000)

    2000

  56. [56]

    Fairbairn, D

    M. Fairbairn, D. J. E. Marsh, J. Quevillon, and S. Rozier, Phys. Rev. D97, 083502 (2018), arXiv:1707.03310 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2018

  57. [57]

    E. W. Kolb and I. I. Tkachev, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 3051 (1993), arXiv:hep-ph/9303313

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  58. [58]

    Chabanier, M

    S. Chabanier, M. Millea, and N. Palanque-Delabrouille, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.489, 2247 (2019), arXiv:1905.08103 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2019

  59. [59]

    Irˇ siˇ c, H

    V. Irˇ siˇ c, H. Xiao, and M. McQuinn, Phys. Rev. D101, 123518 (2020), arXiv:1911.11150 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  60. [60]

    Urrutia, J

    J. Urrutia, J. Ellis, M. Fairbairn, and V. Vaskonen, Astron. Astrophys.702, A109 (2025), arXiv:2504.20043 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    K. K. Rogers and H. V. Peiris, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 071302 (2021), arXiv:2007.12705 [astro-ph.CO]. 18

    work page arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    ¨Unal, F

    C. ¨Unal, F. Pacucci, and A. Loeb, JCAP05, 007 (2021), arXiv:2012.12790 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  63. [63]

    S. J. Witte and A. Mummery, Phys. Rev. D111, 083044 (2025), arXiv:2412.03655 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    P. W. Graham and A. Scherlis, Phys. Rev. D98, 035017 (2018), arXiv:1805.07362 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  65. [65]

    A. A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. D50, 6357 (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9407016

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  66. [66]

    Jukko and A

    L. Jukko and A. Rajantie, (2021), arXiv:2107.07948 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  67. [67]

    Tenkanen, Phys

    T. Tenkanen, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 061302 (2019), arXiv:1905.01214 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2019

  68. [68]

    F. C. Adams, Phys. Rev. D48, 2800 (1993), arXiv:hep- ph/9302321

    work page arXiv 1993

  69. [69]

    Semi-Analytic Calculation of the Gravitational Wave Signal From the Electroweak Phase Transition for General Quartic Scalar Effective Potentials

    J. Kehayias and S. Profumo, JCAP03, 003 (2010), arXiv:0911.0687 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  70. [70]

    Gould, JHEP04, 057 (2021), arXiv:2101.05528 [hep- ph]

    O. Gould, JHEP04, 057 (2021), arXiv:2101.05528 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2021