pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.01920 · v1 · pith:ATESTMSOnew · submitted 2026-07-02 · ✦ hep-ph

Dynamics of Self-Interacting Dark Sectors

Esau Cervantes This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 10:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords dark sectorsfreeze-inself-interacting dark mattercannibal interactionsphase transitionsBoltzmann equationshidden sectorsreheating
0
0 comments X

The pith

Self-interacting dark sectors populated via freeze-in have their thermal histories modified by 2↔3 cannibal reactions, leading to varying constraints on parameter space.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This thesis examines how self-interacting dark sectors populated through freeze-in evolve when self-number-changing reactions of the form 2↔3 are included. These reactions alter the temperature and number density evolution in multiple models such as scalar theories with discrete symmetries and mediator-coupled dark matter. The analysis relies on solving coupled Boltzmann equations that track production and interactions during reheating. The resulting parameter spaces range from being strongly constrained to effectively invisible or potentially reachable by future searches. A hidden U(1) gauge sector example shows that ongoing energy injection can drive an inverse first-order phase transition that restores the symmetric phase temporarily.

Core claim

The thermal evolution of self-interacting dark sectors populated via freeze-in is obtained by solving coupled Boltzmann equations for the relevant number densities and temperatures, accounting for both freeze-in production and cannibal interactions. In realizations including scalar theories with Z2 and Z3 symmetries, self-interacting dark matter coupled to an unstable mediator, and cannibal dark matter production during non-instantaneous reheating, the parameter space can be strongly constrained, effectively invisible, or potentially accessible to future searches. In a hidden U(1) gauge sector, continuous energy injection can induce an inverse first-order phase transition and temporarily res

What carries the argument

Coupled Boltzmann equations for number densities and temperatures that incorporate freeze-in production together with 2↔3 cannibal interactions.

If this is right

  • Cosmological observations can strongly constrain the parameter space in some model realizations.
  • Certain realizations render the dark sector effectively invisible to current detection methods.
  • Other realizations leave parts of parameter space potentially accessible to future searches.
  • Continuous energy injection in hidden U(1) sectors can trigger an inverse first-order phase transition that temporarily restores the symmetric phase.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The link between energy injection and phase restoration suggests that gravitational wave signals from such transitions could be searched for as an independent probe.
  • Non-instantaneous reheating combined with cannibal processes implies that precise measurements of dark matter abundance could distinguish reheating histories.
  • If the Boltzmann treatment remains valid, similar dynamics might appear in other hidden sector models with different symmetries or mediator properties.

Load-bearing premise

The thermal evolution is captured sufficiently by solving coupled Boltzmann equations with the chosen interaction rates and reheating history without requiring full quantum-field-theory corrections or additional hidden processes.

What would settle it

A measurement of dark matter relic density or early-universe temperature evolution that lies outside the ranges predicted for the strongly constrained, invisible, or accessible parameter spaces in the studied realizations.

read the original abstract

This thesis investigates the dynamics of self-interacting dark sectors in the early Universe populated through the freeze-in mechanism. The main focus is on scenarios with self-number-changing reactions of the form $2\leftrightarrow3$, and on how these interactions modify the thermal history and phenomenology of the dark sector. Several realizations are studied, including scalar theories with $\mathbb{Z}_2$ and $\mathbb{Z}_3$ symmetries, self-interacting dark matter coupled to an unstable mediator, and cannibal dark matter production during non-instantaneous reheating. The thermal evolution is obtained by solving coupled Boltzmann equations for the relevant number densities and temperatures, accounting for both freeze-in production and cannibal interactions. The resulting parameter space can be strongly constrained, effectively invisible, or potentially accessible to future searches, depending on the realization considered. Finally, the thesis studies a hidden U(1) gauge sector populated via freeze-in, where continuous energy injection can induce an inverse first-order phase transition and temporarily restore the symmetric phase, linking phase-transition dynamics and chemical equilibration in hidden sectors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. This thesis investigates the dynamics of self-interacting dark sectors populated via freeze-in, with emphasis on 2↔3 self-number-changing reactions. It solves coupled Boltzmann equations for number densities and temperatures across multiple realizations (scalar theories with Z2/Z3 symmetries, self-interacting DM with unstable mediators, cannibal DM during non-instantaneous reheating) and examines a hidden U(1) gauge sector in which continuous energy injection induces an inverse first-order phase transition that temporarily restores the symmetric phase.

Significance. If the numerical solutions prove robust, the work usefully connects chemical equilibration timescales to phase-transition dynamics in hidden sectors and demonstrates that the same framework can yield strongly constrained, invisible, or future-search-accessible parameter spaces depending on the model. The explicit treatment of cannibal processes during freeze-in and reheating adds concrete examples to the literature on non-standard dark-sector thermal histories.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (and, by extension, the methods description): the claim that Boltzmann equations are solved for number densities and temperatures provides no information on the numerical integrator, step-size control, convergence criteria, error estimation, or validation against known limits (e.g., instantaneous reheating or pure freeze-in without cannibalism). These details are load-bearing for all subsequent statements about the resulting parameter-space constraints.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract lists several distinct realizations but does not indicate which results are presented in which chapter or figure; a short roadmap sentence would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the thesis and the positive overall assessment. The single major comment is addressed below; we agree that additional documentation is warranted and will revise accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and, by extension, the methods description): the claim that Boltzmann equations are solved for number densities and temperatures provides no information on the numerical integrator, step-size control, convergence criteria, error estimation, or validation against known limits (e.g., instantaneous reheating or pure freeze-in without cannibalism). These details are load-bearing for all subsequent statements about the resulting parameter-space constraints.

    Authors: We agree that the numerical implementation must be documented explicitly to substantiate the robustness of the solutions. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection (in the methods chapter or an appendix) specifying the ODE integrator, adaptive step-size algorithm, absolute and relative error tolerances, convergence criteria for the coupled number-density and temperature equations, and validation tests against the analytic limits of instantaneous reheating and pure freeze-in without 2↔3 processes. These additions will directly support the reliability of all subsequent parameter-space results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by numerically solving coupled Boltzmann equations for number densities and temperatures under freeze-in production plus 2↔3 cannibal processes, then applying the same framework to specific realizations (Z2/Z3 scalars, unstable mediator, non-instantaneous reheating, hidden U(1)). All reported outcomes for parameter-space visibility are direct numerical outputs of those equations rather than quantities defined by or fitted to the target results themselves. No self-definitional steps, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the stated chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is populated at the level of the stated methods; the central claims rest on the validity of the Boltzmann description and the completeness of the included interaction channels.

free parameters (1)
  • model-specific couplings, masses, and reheating parameters
    The abstract states that the resulting parameter space is mapped, implying multiple free parameters are chosen or constrained within each realization.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Coupled Boltzmann equations for number densities and temperatures accurately capture the thermal evolution including freeze-in and 2-to-3 reactions
    The abstract explicitly states that the thermal evolution is obtained by solving these equations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5697 in / 1440 out tokens · 41683 ms · 2026-07-03T10:58:46.152047+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

247 extracted references · 208 canonical work pages · 13 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Silk et al

    J. Silk et al. Particle Dark Matter: Observations, Models and Searches. Ed. by Gianfranco Bertone. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ . Press, 2010. DOI : 10.1017 /CBO9780511770739

    2010

  2. [2]

    Modified Newtonian Dynamics: Observational Successes and Failures

    Harry Desmond. Modified Newtonian Dynamics: Observational Successes and Failures. 59th Rencontres de Moriond on Gravitation: Moriond 2025 Gravita- tion. May 2025. arXiv: 2505.21638 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    Randall et al

    Scott W. Randall et al. Constraints on the Self-Interaction Cross-Section of Dark Matter from Numerical Simulations of the Merging Galaxy Cluster 1E 0657-56. Astrophys. J. 679 (2008), pp. 1173–1180. DOI : 10.1086/587859

    work page doi:10.1086/587859 2008

  4. [4]

    Dark Matter through the Higgs portal

    Giorgio Arcadi, Abdelhak Djouadi, and Martti Raidal. Dark Matter through the Higgs portal. Phys. Rept. 842 (2020), pp. 1–180. DOI : 10.1016/j.physrep .2019.11.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep 2020

  5. [5]

    Higgs Portal V ector Dark Matter : Revisited

    Seungwon Baek et al. Higgs Portal V ector Dark Matter : Revisited. JHEP 05 (2013), p. 036. DOI : 10.1007/JHEP05(2013)036

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2013)036 2013

  6. [6]

    Blennow et al

    M. Blennow et al. Neutrino Portals to Dark Matter. Eur. Phys. J. C 79.7 (2019), p. 555. DOI : 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7060-5

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7060-5 2019

  7. [9]

    WIMP dark matter candidates and searchescurrent status and future prospects

    Leszek Roszkowski, Enrico Maria Sessolo, and Sebastian Trojanowski. WIMP dark matter candidates and searchescurrent status and future prospects. Rept. Prog. Phys. 81.6 (2018), p. 066201. DOI : 10.1088/1361-6633/aab913

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aab913 2018

  8. [10]

    Aprile et al

    E. Aprile et al. The XENON1T Dark Matter Experiment. Eur. Phys. J. C 77.12 (2017), p. 881. DOI : 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5326-3

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5326-3 2017

  9. [11]

    D. S. Akerib et al. The LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 953 (2020), p. 163047. DOI : 10.1016/j.nima.2019.163047

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2019.163047 2020

  10. [14]

    Bernabei et al

    R. Bernabei et al. The DAMA/LIBRA apparatus. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 592 (2008), pp. 297–315. DOI : 10.1016/j.nima.2008.04.082

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2008.04.082 2008

  11. [15]

    W. B. Atwood, A. A. et.al. Abdo, and Ackermann. The Large Area Telescope on the Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope Mission.Astrophysical Journal 697.2 (June 2009), pp. 1071–1102. DOI : 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1071

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/697/2/1071 2009

  12. [16]

    Clarity through the neutrino fog: constraining new forces in dark matter detectors

    Pablo Blanco-Mas et al. Clarity through the neutrino fog: constraining new forces in dark matter detectors. JHEP 08 (2025), p. 043. DOI : 10.1007/JHEP08 (2025)043. 126 Bibliography

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08 2025

  13. [17]

    Unlock- ing the inelastic Dark Matter window with vector mediators

    Ana Luisa Foguel, Peter Reimitz, and Renata Zukanovich Funchal. Unlock- ing the inelastic Dark Matter window with vector mediators. JHEP 05 (2025), p. 001. DOI : 10.1007/JHEP05(2025)001

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2025)001 2025

  14. [18]

    The simplest dark matter model at the edge of perturbativity

    Miguel Escudero Abenza and Thomas Hambye. The simplest dark matter model at the edge of perturbativity. Phys. Lett. B 868 (2025), p. 139696. DOI : 10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139696

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139696 2025

  15. [19]

    Two-Component Dark Matter

    Subhaditya Bhattacharya et al. Two-Component Dark Matter. JHEP 10 (2013), p. 158. DOI : 10.1007/JHEP10(2013)158

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2013)158 2013

  16. [21]

    Isabel Escudero Sanz, Astrid Heske, and Jeffrey C. Livas. A telescope for LISA - the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna. Advanced Optical T echnologies 7.6 (Dec. 2018), pp. 395–400. DOI : 10.1515/aot-2018-0044

    work page doi:10.1515/aot-2018-0044 2018

  17. [22]

    Cosmology with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    Pierre Auclair et al. Cosmology with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna. Living Rev. Rel. 26.1 (2023), p. 5. DOI : 10.1007/s41114-023-00045-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s41114-023-00045-2 2023

  18. [23]

    The NANOGrav 15 yr Dataset: Search for Gravitational Scattering of Pulsars by Free-floating Objects in Interstellar Space

    Lankeswar Dey et al. The NANOGrav 15 yr Dataset: Search for Gravitational Scattering of Pulsars by Free-floating Objects in Interstellar Space. Astrophys. J. 997.1 (2026), p. 116. DOI : 10.3847/1538-4357/ae279d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae279d 2026

  19. [24]

    Topological defects in cosmology (Oct

    Alejandro Gangui. Topological defects in cosmology (Oct. 2001). arXiv: astr o-ph/0110285

    work page arXiv 2001

  20. [25]

    Figueroa et al

    Daniel G. Figueroa et al. Cosmological Background Interpretation of Pulsar Timing Array Data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132.17 (2024), p. 171002. DOI : 10.1103/Ph ysRevLett.132.171002

    work page doi:10.1103/ph 2024

  21. [26]

    Freezing-in cannibal dark sectors.JHEP 11 (2024), p

    Esau Cervantes and Andrzej Hryczuk. Freezing-in cannibal dark sectors.JHEP 11 (2024), p. 050. DOI : 10.1007/JHEP11(2024)050

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2024)050 2024

  22. [27]

    Freezing-in cannibals with low-reheating temperature

    Nicolás Bernal et al. Freezing-in cannibals with low-reheating temperature. JHEP 09 (2025), p. 083. DOI : 10.1007/JHEP09(2025)083

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2025)083 2025

  23. [28]

    A. V . Zasov et al. Dark matter in galaxies.Physics Uspekhi 60.1 (Apr. 2017), p. 3. DOI : 10.3367/UFNe.2016.03.037751

    work page doi:10.3367/ufne.2016.03.037751 2017

  24. [29]

    Dark Matter in Groups and Clusters of Galaxies

    Jaan Einasto and Maret Einasto. Dark matter in groups and clusters of galax- ies. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 209 (2000), pp. 360–372. arXiv: astro-ph/9909437

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  25. [30]

    CMB photons shedding light on dark matter

    Gaelle Giesen et al. CMB photons shedding light on dark matter. JCAP 12 (2012), p. 008. DOI : 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/12/008

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/12/008 2012

  26. [31]

    The Extended Rotation Curve and the Dark Matter Halo of M33

    Edvige Corbelli and Paolo Salucci. The Extended Rotation Curve and the Dark Matter Halo of M33. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 311 (2000), pp. 441–

    2000

  27. [32]

    DOI : 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03075.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03075.x 2000

  28. [33]

    Indefinitely Flat Circular V elocities and the Baryonic Tul- lyFisher Relation from Weak Lensing

    Tobias Mistele et al. Indefinitely Flat Circular V elocities and the Baryonic Tul- lyFisher Relation from Weak Lensing. Astrophys. J. Lett. 969.1 (2024), p. L3. DOI : 10.3847/2041-8213/ad54b0

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad54b0 2024

  29. [34]

    McGaugh, and James M

    Federico Lelli, Stacy S. McGaugh, and James M. Schombert. SPARC: Mass Models for 175 Disk Galaxies with Spitzer Photometry and Accurate Rotation Curves. Astron. J. 152 (2016), p. 157. DOI : 10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/157

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/157 2016

  30. [35]

    Wechsler and Jeremy L

    Risa H. Wechsler and Jeremy L. Tinker. The Connection between Galaxies and their Dark Matter Halos. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 56 (2018), pp. 435–

    2018

  31. [36]

    DOI : 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051756

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051756

  32. [37]

    A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter

    Douglas Clowe et al. A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter. Astrophys. J. Lett. 648 (2006), pp. L109–L113. DOI : 10.1086/508162

    work page doi:10.1086/508162 2006

  33. [38]

    A High-Caliber View of the Bullet Cluster through JWST Strong and Weak Lensing Analyses

    Sangjun Cha et al. A High-Caliber View of the Bullet Cluster through JWST Strong and Weak Lensing Analyses. Astrophysical Journal Letters 987.1 (2025), p. L15. DOI : 10.3847/2041-8213/add2f0. Bibliography 127

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/add2f0 2025

  34. [39]

    Astronomy

    The Bullet Cluster. Astronomy. Jan. 1, 2024. URL : https://www.astronomy.c om/science/the-bullet-cluster/ (visited on 04/20/2026)

    2024

  35. [40]

    Graham, and Harikrishnan Ramani

    Zachary Bogorad, Peter W. Graham, and Harikrishnan Ramani. Coherent self-interactions of dark matter in the Bullet Cluster. JCAP 03 (2025), p. 067. DOI : 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/03/067

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/03/067 2025

  36. [41]

    Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure

    Sean Tulin and Hai-Bo Yu. Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure. Phys. Rept. 730 (2018), pp. 1–57. DOI : 10. 1016/j .physrep .2017 .11.004

    2018

  37. [42]

    Aghanim et al

    N. Aghanim et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020). [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], A6. DOI : 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 2018

  38. [43]

    Hinshaw et al

    G. Hinshaw et al. Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results. The Astrophysical Journal 208.2, 19 (Oct. 2013), p. 19. DOI : 10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19 2013

  39. [44]

    A. G. Adame et al. DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measure- ments of baryon acoustic oscillations. JCAP 02 (2025), p. 021. DOI : 10.1088/1 475-7516/2025/02/021

    work page doi:10.1088/1 2024

  40. [45]

    Challenges for ΛCDM: An up- date

    Leandros Perivolaropoulos and Foteini Skara. Challenges for ΛCDM: An up- date. New Astron. Rev. 95 (2022), p. 101659. DOI : 10.1016/j.newar.2022.101 659

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newar.2022.101 2022

  41. [46]

    Probing dark matter with future CMB measurements

    Junsong Cang, Yu Gao, and Yin-Zhe Ma. Probing dark matter with future CMB measurements. Phys. Rev. D 102.10 (2020), p. 103005. DOI : 10.1103/Phy sRevD.102.103005

    work page doi:10.1103/phy 2020

  42. [47]

    Clara Xu, Wenzer Qin, and Tracy R. Slatyer. CMB limits on decaying dark matter beyond the ionization threshold. Phys. Rev. D 110.12 (2024), p. 123529. DOI : 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.123529

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.123529 2024

  43. [48]

    Revisiting CMB constraints on dark matter annihi- lation

    Masahiro Kawasaki et al. Revisiting CMB constraints on dark matter annihi- lation. JCAP 12.12 (2021), p. 015. DOI : 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/12/015

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/12/015 2021

  44. [49]

    Updated constraints on decaying cold dark matter

    Andreas Nygaard, Thomas Tram, and Steen Hannestad. Updated constraints on decaying cold dark matter. JCAP 05 (2021), p. 017. DOI : 10.1088/1475-75 16/2021/05/017

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-75 2021

  45. [50]

    Slatyer and Chih-Liang Wu

    Tracy R. Slatyer and Chih-Liang Wu. General Constraints on Dark Matter Decay from the Cosmic Microwave Background. Phys. Rev. D 95.2 (2017), p. 023010. DOI : 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.023010

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.023010 2017

  46. [51]

    Kolb and Michael S

    Edward W. Kolb and Michael S. Turner. The Early Universe. V ol. 69. Taylor and Francis, May 2019. DOI : 10.1201/9780429492860

    work page doi:10.1201/9780429492860 2019

  47. [52]

    Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis

    Brian D. Fields, Paolo Molaro, and Subir Sarkar. Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis. Chin. Phys. C 38 (2014), pp. 339–344. arXiv: 1412.1408 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  48. [53]

    Fields et al

    Brian D. Fields et al. Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis after Planck. JCAP 03 (2020). [Erratum: JCAP 11, E02 (2020)], p. 010. DOI : 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/0 10

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/0 2020

  49. [54]

    Monopoles and cosmology

    George Lazarides. Monopoles and cosmology. Nucl. Phys. B 252 (1985). Ed. by R. Baier and H. Satz, pp. 207–216. DOI : 10.1016/0550-3213(85)90437-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90437-7 1985

  50. [55]

    Alan H. Guth. The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Hori- zon and Flatness Problems. Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981). Ed. by Li-Zhi Fang and R. Ruffini, pp. 347–356. DOI : 10.1103/PhysRevD.23.347

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.347 1981

  51. [56]

    Starobinsky

    Alexei A. Starobinsky . A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models With- out Singularity .Phys. Lett. B 91 (1980). Ed. by I. M. Khalatnikov and V . P . Mi- neev , pp. 99–102.DOI : 10.1016/0370-2693(80)90670-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90670-x 1980

  52. [57]

    Andrei D. Linde. A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity , Isotropy and Primordial Monopole 128 Bibliography Problems. Phys. Lett. B 108 (1982). Ed. by Li-Zhi Fang and R. Ruffini, pp. 389–

    1982

  53. [58]

    DOI : 10.1016/0370-2693(82)91219-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)91219-9

  54. [59]

    String cosmology: From the early universe to today

    Michele Cicoli et al. String cosmology: From the early universe to today. Phys. Rept. 1059 (2024), pp. 1–155. DOI : 10.1016/j.physrep.2024.01.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.01.002 2024

  55. [60]

    Richard Watkins and Lawrence M. Widrow. Aspects of Reheating in First Order Inflation. Nucl. Phys. B 374 (1992), pp. 446–468. DOI : 10.1016/0550-32 13(92)90362-F

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-32 1992

  56. [61]

    Inflation

    Daniel Baumann. Inflation. Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Physics of the Large and the Small . 2011, pp. 523–686. DOI : 10.1 142/9789814327183_0010

    2011

  57. [62]

    Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity

    Steven Weinberg. Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1972

    1972

  58. [63]

    Modern Cosmology

    Scott Dodelson. Modern Cosmology. Amsterdam: Academic Press, 2003

    2003

  59. [64]

    Cosmology

    Steven Weinberg. Cosmology. Oxford University Press, 2008

    2008

  60. [66]

    How isotropic is the Universe? Phys

    Daniela Saadeh et al. How isotropic is the Universe? Phys. Rev. Lett. 117.13 (2016), p. 131302. DOI : 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.131302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.131302 2016

  61. [67]

    Reheating an Inflationary Universe

    Andreas Albrecht et al. Reheating an Inflationary Universe. Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982), p. 1437. DOI : 10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1437

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.48.1437 1982

  62. [68]

    What is the lowest possible reheating temperature? Phys

    Steen Hannestad. What is the lowest possible reheating temperature? Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004), p. 043506. DOI : 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.043506

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.043506 2004

  63. [69]

    MeV-scale reheating temperature and thermalization of oscillating neutrinos by radiative and hadronic decays of massive particles

    Takuya Hasegawa et al. MeV-scale reheating temperature and thermalization of oscillating neutrinos by radiative and hadronic decays of massive particles. JCAP 12 (2019), p. 012. DOI : 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/12/012

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/12/012 2019

  64. [70]

    Gilberto M. Kremer. The Boltzmann equation in special and general relativity. AIP Conf. Proc. 1501 (2012), pp. 160–167. DOI : 10.1063/1.4769495

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4769495 2012

  65. [72]

    AlterBBN: A program for calculating the BBN abundances of the elements in alternative cosmologies

    Alexandre Arbey. AlterBBN: A program for calculating the BBN abundances of the elements in alternative cosmologies. Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012), pp. 1822–1831. DOI : 10.1016/j.cpc.2012.03.018

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2012.03.018 2012

  66. [73]

    Alguero et al

    G. Alguero et al. micrOMEGAs 6.0: N-component dark matter. Comput. Phys. Commun. 299 (2024), p. 109133. DOI : 10.1016/j.cpc.2024.109133

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2024.109133 2024

  67. [74]

    MadDM v .3.0: a Comprehensive Tool for Dark Matter Studies

    Federico Ambrogi et al. MadDM v .3.0: a Comprehensive Tool for Dark Matter Studies. Phys. Dark Univ. 24 (2019), p. 100249. DOI : 10.1016/j.dark.2018.1 1.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2018.1 2019

  68. [75]

    Arbey, F

    A. Arbey, F. Mahmoudi, and G. Robbins. SuperIso Relic v4: A program for calculating dark matter and flavour physics observables in Supersymmetry. Comput. Phys. Commun. 239 (2019), pp. 238–264. DOI : 10.1016/j.cpc.2019.0 1.014

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2019.0 2019

  69. [77]

    Dark matter relic abundance beyond kinetic equilibrium

    Tobias Binder et al. Dark matter relic abundance beyond kinetic equilibrium. Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021), p. 577. DOI : 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09357-5

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09357-5 2021

  70. [78]

    Molecular Chemistry for Dark Matter III: DarkKROME

    Michael Ryan et al. Molecular Chemistry for Dark Matter III: DarkKROME. Astrophys. J. 934 (2022), p. 122. DOI : 10.3847/1538-4357/ac75e5. Bibliography 129

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac75e5 2022

  71. [79]

    Early kinetic decoupling of dark matter: when the stan- dard way of calculating the thermal relic density fails

    Tobias Binder et al. Early kinetic decoupling of dark matter: when the stan- dard way of calculating the thermal relic density fails. Phys. Rev. D 96.11 (2017). [Erratum: Phys.Rev .D 101, 099901 (2020)], p. 115010. DOI : 10 . 1103 /PhysRevD.96.115010

    2017

  72. [80]

    Boltzmann Equation Solver for Thermalization (Mar

    Jong-Hyun Yoon. Boltzmann Equation Solver for Thermalization (Mar. 2026). arXiv: 2603.28848 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  73. [81]

    The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) I: Overview

    Julien Lesgourgues. The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) I: Overview. arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1104.2932 (Apr. 2011), arXiv:1104.2932. DOI : 10.48550/arXiv.1104.2932

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1104.2932 2011

  74. [82]

    gCAMB: A GPU-accelerated Boltzmann solver for next- generation cosmological surveys

    Loriano Storchi et al. gCAMB: A GPU-accelerated Boltzmann solver for next- generation cosmological surveys. Astron. Comput. 55 (2026), p. 101038. DOI : 10.1016/j.ascom.2025.101038

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2025.101038 2026

  75. [83]

    J. I. Kapusta and Charles Gale. Finite-temperature field theory: Principles and applications. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2011. DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511535130

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511535130 2011

  76. [84]

    Basics of Thermal Field Theory

    Mikko Laine and Aleksi Vuorinen. Basics of Thermal Field Theory. V ol. 925. Springer, 2016. DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-31933-9

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31933-9 2016

  77. [86]

    Symmetry Restoration and Breaking at Finite Temperature: An Introductory Review

    Eibun Senaha. Symmetry Restoration and Breaking at Finite Temperature: An Introductory Review. Symmetry 12.5 (2020), p. 733. DOI : 10.3390/sym120507 33

    work page doi:10.3390/sym120507 2020

  78. [87]

    Andrei D. Linde. Decay of the False Vacuum at Finite Temperature. Nucl. Phys. B 216 (1983). [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 223, 544 (1983)], p. 421. DOI : 10 .1016/0550-3213(83)90072-X

    1983

  79. [88]

    Review of cosmic phase transitions: their significance and experimental signatures

    Anupam Mazumdar and Graham White. Review of cosmic phase transitions: their significance and experimental signatures. Rept. Prog. Phys. 82.7 (2019), p. 076901. DOI : 10.1088/1361-6633/ab1f55

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ab1f55 2019

  80. [89]

    Hindmarsh et al

    Mark B. Hindmarsh et al. Phase transitions in the early universe. SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 24 (2021), p. 1. DOI : 10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.24

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyslectnotes.24 2021

Showing first 80 references.