pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.02320 · v1 · pith:IOUIDPWDnew · submitted 2026-07-02 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.atom-ph

Time-Reversal and Reversible Dynamics in Cavity QED for Quantum Metrology

Simone Colombo , Edwin Pedrozo-Pe\~nafiel This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 11:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.atom-ph
keywords quantum metrologycavity QEDtime-reversalentanglement decodinginteraction-based readoutquantum sensing
0
0 comments X

The pith

Reversible many-body dynamics in cavity QED decode entangled signals for quantum metrology.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that many-body interactions can serve dual purposes in quantum metrology: generating entanglement and decoding the encoded information through time-reversal. Cavity QED is highlighted as an ideal platform for implementing these reversible dynamics due to its collective enhancement and tunable interactions. This review positions the ability to decode quantum information as equally important as generating it, making reversible many-body dynamics a key resource for quantum-enhanced sensing.

Core claim

Time-reversal protocols, including signal amplification through a time-reversed interaction (SATIN) and scrambling-enhanced metrology, use controlled nonlinear dynamics in cavity QED to transform weakly encoded signals into accessible observables, establishing reversible many-body dynamics as a central resource for quantum-enhanced sensing.

What carries the argument

Time-reversal of many-body interactions enabling interaction-based readout and signal amplification.

If this is right

  • Time-reversal protocols amplify metrological signals beyond the standard quantum limit.
  • Decoding via reversible dynamics extracts advantage from entangled states.
  • Cavity QED enables controllable reversibility for these protocols.
  • Nonlinear decoding extends metrology to complex entangled states.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These methods could be adapted to other platforms like optical lattices or ion traps for broader quantum sensing applications.
  • Hybrid systems might integrate generation and decoding in one setup to optimize overall sensitivity.
  • Experimental tests in larger atom numbers could quantify the scaling benefits of reversible dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

Cavity QED provides collective enhancement, tunable interactions, and controllable reversibility within a single platform.

What would settle it

Demonstration that applying time-reversed interactions in a cavity QED system fails to improve the sensitivity or accessibility of metrological information compared to direct measurement.

read the original abstract

Quantum-enhanced metrology relies on entanglement to achieve sensitivities beyond the standard quantum limit. While remarkable progress has been made in generating highly entangled many-body states, extracting their metrological advantage remains a central challenge because the encoded information is often inaccessible to realistic measurements. A key development of the past decade has been the realization that many-body interactions can play a dual role: they can be used not only to generate entanglement, but also to decode it. This idea underlies interaction-based readout and time-reversal protocols, in which controlled non-linear dynamics transform weakly encoded signals into experimentally accessible observables. Cavity quantum electrodynamics (QED) provides a particularly powerful setting for these approaches because it combines collective enhancement, tunable interactions, and controllable reversibility within a single platform. In this review, we discuss the emergence of time-reversal protocols in cavity QED, from their conceptual roots in Loschmidt echoes to modern implementations of signal amplification through a time-reversed interaction (SATIN), scrambling-enhanced metrology, and more general interaction-based readout schemes. We examine the physical mechanisms that enable reversible many-body dynamics, review key experimental demonstrations, and discuss future directions involving complex entangled states, nonlinear decoding, and emerging quantum platforms. Together, these developments suggest that the ability to decode quantum information may become as important as the ability to generate it, establishing reversible many-body dynamics as a central resource for quantum-enhanced sensing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. This review paper surveys the use of time-reversal and reversible many-body dynamics in cavity QED for quantum metrology. It argues that many-body interactions serve a dual role in both generating entanglement and decoding encoded information through protocols such as interaction-based readout and signal amplification through a time-reversed interaction (SATIN). The manuscript traces conceptual roots to Loschmidt echoes, covers scrambling-enhanced metrology and related schemes, highlights cavity QED advantages (collective enhancement, tunable interactions, reversibility), reviews experimental demonstrations, and outlines future directions with complex states and nonlinear decoding. The central perspectival claim is that the ability to decode quantum information may become as important as generating it, positioning reversible dynamics as a key resource alongside entanglement generation.

Significance. If the synthesis is accurate, the review could help consolidate an emerging perspective in quantum metrology by linking disparate protocols under the umbrella of reversible dynamics. As a review without new derivations, theorems, or primary data, its value lies in coherent aggregation of existing literature rather than novel predictions or proofs; this may guide experimental design in cavity QED platforms but does not itself constitute a falsifiable advance.

minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract and introduction could more explicitly distinguish review content from forward-looking speculation to help readers calibrate expectations for a survey paper.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and their recommendation to accept. The referee's summary accurately reflects the scope of the review, which synthesizes the role of reversible many-body dynamics in cavity QED metrology without introducing new derivations or data.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: review aggregates external concepts without internal derivations

full rationale

This is a review paper that surveys time-reversal and interaction-based readout protocols in cavity QED, drawing on established ideas such as Loschmidt echoes and SATIN without presenting new equations, theorems, or quantitative predictions. The central claim is a forward-looking synthesis about the importance of reversible dynamics, supported by citations to prior independent work rather than any self-referential fitting or definitional loop. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to the paper's own inputs, making the derivation chain self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced; the work summarizes existing literature on cavity QED metrology.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5784 in / 950 out tokens · 41810 ms · 2026-07-03T11:57:59.458650+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Wineland, D.J., Bollinger, J.J., Itano, W.M., Moore, F.L., Heinzen, D.J.: Spin squeezing and reduced quantum noise in spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. A46, 6797– 6800 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.46.R6797

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.46.r6797 1992

  2. [2]

    Wineland, D.J., Bollinger, J.J., Itano, W.M., Heinzen, D.J.: Squeezed atomic states and projection noise in spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. A50, 67–88 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.50.67

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.50.67 1994

  3. [3]

    Science306(5700), 1330–1336 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1104149

    Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., Maccone, L.: Quantum-enhanced measurements: beating the standard quantum limit. Science306(5700), 1330–1336 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1104149

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1104149 2004

  4. [4]

    Tóth, G., Apellaniz, I.: Quantum metrology from a quantum information science perspective. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.47(42), 424006 (2014) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1751-8113/47/42/424006

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/42/424006 2014

  5. [5]

    Nature455(7217), 1216–1219 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07332

    Estève, J., Gross, C., Weller, A., Giovanazzi, S., Oberthaler, M.K.: Squeezing and entanglement in a bose–einstein condensate. Nature455(7217), 1216–1219 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07332

    work page doi:10.1038/nature07332 2008

  6. [6]

    Nature464(7292), 1165–1169 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08919

    Gross, C., Zibold, T., Nicklas, E., Esteve, J., Oberthaler, M.K.: Nonlinear atom interferometer surpasses classical precision limit. Nature464(7292), 1165–1169 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08919

    work page doi:10.1038/nature08919 2010

  7. [7]

    Hamley,C.D.,Gerving,C.,Hoang,T.M.,Bookjans,E.M.,Chapman,M.S.:Spin- nematic squeezed vacuum in a quantum gas. Nat. Phys.8(4), 305–308 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2245

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys2245 2012

  8. [8]

    Ma, J., Wang, X., Sun, C.-P., Nori, F.: Quantum spin squeezing. Phys. Rep. 509(2-3), 89–165 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2011.08.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2011.08.003 2011

  9. [9]

    Pezze, L., Smerzi, A., Oberthaler, M.K., Schmied, R., Treutlein, P.: Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles. Rev. Mod. Phys.90(3), 035005 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.035005

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.035005 2018

  10. [10]

    Huang, J., Zhuang, M., Lee, C.: Entanglement-enhanced quantum metrology: From standard quantum limit to heisenberg limit. Appl. Phys. Rev.11(3), 031302 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0204102

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0204102 2024

  11. [11]

    Nature581(7807), 159–163 (2020) https://doi

    Bao, H., Duan, J., Jin, S., Lu, X., Li, P., Qu, W., Wang, M., Novikova, I., Mikhailov, E.E., Zhao, K.-F.,et al.: Spin squeezing of1011 atoms by prediction and retrodiction measurements. Nature581(7807), 159–163 (2020) https://doi. org/10.1038/s41586-020-2243-7 23

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2243-7 2020

  12. [12]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.02202 (2025) https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.02202

    Kaubruegger, R., Kaufman, A.M.: Progress in quantum metrology and appli- cations for optical atomic clocks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.02202 (2025) https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.02202

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.02202 2025

  13. [13]

    Ludlow, A.D., Boyd, M.M., Ye, J., Peik, E., Schmidt, P.O.: Optical atomic clocks. Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 637–701 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/ RevModPhys.87.637

    2015

  14. [14]

    Gil, L.I.R., Mukherjee, R., Bridge, E.M., Jones, M.P.A., Pohl, T.: Spin squeezing in a rydberg lattice clock. Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 103601 (2014) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.103601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.103601 2014

  15. [15]

    Nature588(7838), 414–418 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-3006-1

    Pedrozo-Peñafiel, E., Colombo, S., Shu, C., Adiyatullin, A.F., Li, Z., Mendez, E., Braverman, B., Kawasaki, A., Akamatsu, D., Xiao, Y.,et al.: Entanglement on an optical atomic-clock transition. Nature588(7838), 414–418 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-3006-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-3006-1 2020

  16. [16]

    Schulte, M., Lisdat, C., Schmidt, P.O., Sterr, U., Hammerer, K.: Prospects and challenges for squeezing-enhanced optical atomic clocks. Nat. Commun.11(1), 5955 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19403-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19403-7 2020

  17. [17]

    Colombo, S., Pedrozo-Peñafiel, E., Vuletić, V.: Entanglement-enhanced opti- cal atomic clocks. Appl. Phys. Lett.121(21) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1063/5. 0121372

    work page doi:10.1063/5 2022

  18. [18]

    Science304(5676), 1476–1478 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097576

    Leibfried, D., Barrett, M.D., Schaetz, T., Britton, J., Chiaverini, J., Itano, W.M., Jost, J.D., Langer, C., Wineland, D.J.: Toward heisenberg-limited spec- troscopy with multiparticle entangled states. Science304(5676), 1476–1478 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097576

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1097576 2004

  19. [19]

    Nature609(7928), 689–694 (2022) https://doi.org/10

    Nichol, B.C., Srinivas, R., Nadlinger, D.P., Drmota, P., Main, D., Araneda, G., Ballance, C.J., Lucas, D.M.: An elementary quantum network of entangled optical atomic clocks. Nature609(7928), 689–694 (2022) https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41586-022-05088-z

    2022

  20. [20]

    Dietze, K., Pelzer, L., Krinner, L., Dawel, F., Kramer, J., Spethmann, N.C.H., Kielinski, T., Hammerer, K., Stahl, K., Klose, J., Dörscher, S., Lisdat, C., Ben- kler, E., Schmidt, P.O.: Entanglement-enhanced optical ion clock. Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 073601 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1103/dyqm-k8p6

    work page doi:10.1103/dyqm-k8p6 2026

  21. [21]

    Robinson, J.M., Miklos, M., Tso, Y.M., Kennedy, C.J., Bothwell, T., Kedar, D., Thompson, J.K., Ye, J.: Direct comparison of two spin-squeezed optical clock ensembles at the10 −17 level. Nat. Phys.20(2), 208–213 (2024) https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41567-023-02310-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-023-02310-1 2024

  22. [22]

    Yang, Y., Miklos, M., Tso, Y.M., Kraus, S., Hur, J., Ye, J.: Clock precision beyond the standard quantum limit at10−18 level. Phys. Rev. Lett.135(19), 24 193202 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/6v93-whwq

    work page doi:10.1103/6v93-whwq 2025

  23. [23]

    Nature621(7980), 734–739 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06360-6

    Eckner, W.J., Darkwah Oppong, N., Cao, A., Young, A.W., Milner, W.R., Robinson, J.M., Ye, J., Kaufman, A.M.: Realizing spin squeezing with ryd- berg interactions in an optical clock. Nature621(7980), 734–739 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06360-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06360-6 2023

  24. [24]

    Nature634(8033), 315–320 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07913-z

    Cao, A., Eckner, W.J., Lukin Yelin, T., Young, A.W., Jandura, S., Yan, L., Kim, K., Pupillo, G., Ye, J., Darkwah Oppong, N.,et al.: Multi-qubit gates and schrödinger cat states in an optical clock. Nature634(8033), 315–320 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07913-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07913-z 2024

  25. [25]

    Szigeti, S.S., Hosten, O., Haine, S.A.: Improving cold-atom sensors with quan- tum entanglement: Prospects and challenges. Appl. Phys. Lett.118(14) (2021) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0050235

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0050235 2021

  26. [26]

    Nature610(7932), 472–477 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05197-9

    Greve, G.P., Luo, C., Wu, B., Thompson, J.K.: Entanglement-enhanced matter- wave interferometry in a high-finesse cavity. Nature610(7932), 472–477 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05197-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05197-9 2022

  27. [27]

    DeMille, D., Hutzler, N.R., Rey, A.M., Zelevinsky, T.: Quantum sensing and metrology for fundamental physics with molecules. Nat. Phys.20(5), 741–749 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02499-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-024-02499-9 2024

  28. [28]

    Quantum Sci

    Terrano, W., Romalis, M.: Comagnetometer probes of dark matter and new physics. Quantum Sci. Technol.7(1), 014001 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 2058-9565/ac1ae0

    2022

  29. [29]

    Budker, D., Romalis, M.: Optical magnetometry. Nat. Phys.3(4), 227–234 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys566

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys566 2007

  30. [30]

    Degen, C.L., Reinhard, F., Cappellaro, P.: Quantum sensing. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89(3), 035002 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.035002 2017

  31. [31]

    Ye, J., Zoller, P.: Essay: Quantum sensing with atomic, molecular, and optical platforms for fundamental physics. Phys. Rev. Lett.132(19), 190001 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.190001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.190001 2024

  32. [32]

    Science345(6195), 424–427 (2014) https://doi.org/10

    Strobel, H., Muessel, W., Linnemann, D., Zibold, T., Hume, D.B., Pezzè, L., Smerzi, A., Oberthaler, M.K.: Fisher information and entanglement of non- gaussian spin states. Science345(6195), 424–427 (2014) https://doi.org/10. 1126/science.1250147

    2014

  33. [33]

    Fröwis, F., Sekatski, P., Dür, W.: Detecting large quantum fisher information with finite measurement precision. Phys. Rev. Lett.115(9) (2015) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.090801 25

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.090801 2015

  34. [34]

    Colombo, S., Pedrozo-Peñafiel, E., Adiyatullin, A.F., Li, Z., Mendez, E., Shu, C., Vuletić, V.: Time-reversal-based quantum metrology with many- body entangled states. Nat. Phys.18, 925–930 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-022-01653-5

    2022

  35. [35]

    Davis, E., Bentsen, G., Schleier-Smith, M.: Approaching the heisenberg limit without single-particle detection. Phys. Rev. Lett.116(5) (2016) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.053601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.053601 2016

  36. [36]

    Nature634(8033), 321–327 (2024) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41586-024-08005-8

    Finkelstein, R., Tsai, R.B.-S., Sun, X., Scholl, P., Direkci, S., Gefen, T., Choi, J., Shaw, A.L., Endres, M.: Universal quantum operations and ancilla-based read-out for tweezer clocks. Nature634(8033), 321–327 (2024) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41586-024-08005-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08005-8 2024

  37. [37]

    Science352(6293), 1552–1555 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.aaf3397

    Hosten, O., Krishnakumar, R., Engelsen, N.J., Kasevich, M.A.: Quantum phase magnification. Science352(6293), 1552–1555 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.aaf3397

    2016

  38. [38]

    Nolan, S.P., Szigeti, S.S., Haine, S.A.: Optimal and robust quantum metrology using interaction-based readouts. Phys. Rev. Lett.119(19) (2017) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.193601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.193601 2017

  39. [39]

    Haine, S.A.: Using interaction-based readouts to approach the ultimate limit of detection-noise robustness for quantum-enhanced metrology in collective spin systems. Phys. Rev. A98(3) (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA. 98.030303

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva 2018

  40. [40]

    Quantum4, 268–286 (2020) https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-05-15-268

    Schulte, M., Martínez-Lahuerta, V.J., Scharnagl, M.S., Hammerer, K.: Ramsey interferometry with generalized one-axis twisting echoes. Quantum4, 268–286 (2020) https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-05-15-268

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2020-05-15-268 2020

  41. [41]

    Macrì, T., Smerzi, A., Pezzè, L.: Loschmidt echo for quantum metrology. Phys. Rev. A94(1) (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.010102

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.94.010102 2016

  42. [42]

    Scholarpedia7(8), 11687 (2012) https://doi.org/10.4249/scholarpedia.11687

    Goussev, A., Jalabert, R.A., Pastawski, H.M., Wisniacki, D.: Loschmidt echo. Scholarpedia7(8), 11687 (2012) https://doi.org/10.4249/scholarpedia.11687

    work page doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.11687 2012

  43. [43]

    Science380(6652), 1381–1384 (2023) https://doi.org/10

    Li, Z., Colombo, S., Shu, C., Velez, G., Pilatowsky-Cameo, S., Schmied, R., Choi, S., Lukin, M., Pedrozo-Peñafiel, E., Vuletić, V.: Improving metrology with quantum scrambling. Science380(6652), 1381–1384 (2023) https://doi.org/10. 1126/science.adg9500

    2023

  44. [44]

    Linnemann, D., Strobel, H., Muessel, W., Schulz, J., Lewis-Swan, R.J., Kheruntsyan, K.V., Oberthaler, M.K.: Quantum-enhanced sensing based on time reversal of nonlinear dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett.117(1) (2016) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.013001 26

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.013001 2016

  45. [45]

    Mao, T.-W., Liu, Q., Li, X., Cao, J.-H., Chen, F., Xu, W., Sun, Y.-R., Wang, M., You, L.: Quantum-enhanced sensing by echoing spin-nematic squeezing in atomic bose–einstein condensate. Nat. Phys.18, 1585–1590 (2022) https://doi. org/10.1038/s41567-023-02168-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-023-02168-3 2022

  46. [46]

    Science373(6555), 673–678 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abi5226

    Gilmore, K.A., Affolter, M., Lewis-Swan, R.J., Barberena, D., Jordan, E., Rey, A.M., Bollinger, J.J.: Quantum-enhanced sensing of displacements and electric fields with two-dimensional trapped-ion crystals. Science373(6555), 673–678 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abi5226

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abi5226 2021

  47. [47]

    PRX Quantum3(2) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.020308

    Li, Z., Braverman, B., Colombo, S., Shu, C., Kawasaki, A., Adiyatullin, A.F., Pedrozo-Peñafiel, E., Mendez, E., Vuletić, V.: Collective spin-light and light- mediated spin-spin interactions in an optical cavity. PRX Quantum3(2) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.020308

    work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.020308 2022

  48. [48]

    Nature529(7587), 505–508 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16176

    Hosten, O., Engelsen, N.J., Krishnakumar, R., Kasevich, M.A.: Measurement noise 100 times lower than the quantum-projection limit using entangled atoms. Nature529(7587), 505–508 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16176

    work page doi:10.1038/nature16176 2016

  49. [49]

    Cox, K.C., Greve, G.P., Weiner, J.M., Thompson, J.K.: Deterministic squeezed states with collective measurements and feedback. Phys. Rev. Lett.116(9), 093602 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.093602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.093602 2016

  50. [50]

    Schleier-Smith, M.H., Leroux, I.D., Vuletić, V.: Squeezing the collective spin of a dilute atomic ensemble by cavity feedback. Phys. Rev. A81, 021804 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.81.021804

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.81.021804 2010

  51. [51]

    Leroux,I.D.,Schleier-Smith,M.H.,Vuletić,V.:Implementationofcavitysqueez- ing of a collective atomic spin. Phys. Rev. Lett.104(7), 073602 (2010) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.073602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.073602 2010

  52. [52]

    Braverman, B., Kawasaki, A., Pedrozo-Peñafiel, E., Colombo, S., Shu, C., Li, Z., Mendez, E., Yamoah, M., Salvi, L., Akamatsu, D., Xiao, Y., Vuletić, V.: Near- unitary spin squeezing in 171Yb. Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 223203 (2019) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.223203

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.223203 2019

  53. [53]

    Nature646(8084), 309–314 (2025) https://doi.org/10

    Zaporski, L., Liu, Q., Velez, G., Radzihovsky, M., Li, Z., Colombo, S., Pedrozo- Peñafiel, E., Vuletić, V.: Quantum-amplified global-phase spectroscopy on an optical clock transition. Nature646(8084), 309–314 (2025) https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41586-025-09578-8

    2025

  54. [54]

    In: Arimondo, E., Berman, P.R., Lin, C.C

    Tanji-Suzuki, H., Leroux, I.D., Schleier-Smith, M.H., Cetina, M., Grier, A.T., Simon, J., Vuletić, V.: Interaction between atomic ensembles and optical res- onators: Classical description. In: Arimondo, E., Berman, P.R., Lin, C.C. (eds.) Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. vol. 60, pp. 201–237. Academic Press, New York (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-38550...

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-385508-4.00004-8 2011

  55. [55]

    EPL42(5), 481–486 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1209/ epl/i1998-00277-9

    Kuzmich, A., Bigelow, N., Mandel, L.: Atomic quantum non-demolition mea- surements and squeezing. EPL42(5), 481–486 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1209/ epl/i1998-00277-9

    1998

  56. [56]

    Appel, J., Windpassinger, P.J., Oblak, D., Hoff, U.B., Kjærgaard, N., Polzik, E.S.: Mesoscopic atomic entanglement for precision measurements beyond the standard quantum limit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.106(27), 10960–10965 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901550106

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.0901550106 2009

  57. [57]

    Saffman, M., Oblak, D., Appel, J., Polzik, E.: Spin squeezing of atomic ensem- bles by multicolor quantum nondemolition measurements. Phys. Rev. A79(2), 023831 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.79.023831

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.79.023831 2009

  58. [58]

    Dissipative generation of spin squeezing in the resolved vacuum Rabi splitting limit

    Chaparro, E., Song, E.Y., Barberena, D., Thompson, J.K., Rey, A.M., Young, J.T.: Dissipative generation of spin squeezing in the resolved vacuum rabi split- ting limit. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.30815 (2026) https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2605.30815

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  59. [59]

    Takano, T., Fuyama, M., Namiki, R., Takahashi, Y.: Spin squeezing of a cold atomic ensemble with the nuclear spin of one-half. Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 033601 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.033601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.033601 2009

  60. [60]

    Kitagawa, M., Ueda, M.: Squeezed spin states. Phys. Rev. A47, 5138–5143 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.47.5138

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.47.5138 1993

  61. [61]

    Morigi, G., Solano, E., Englert, B.-G., Walther, H.: Reversing the jaynes– cummings dynamics to measure decoherence. J. Opt. B: Quantum semiclass. Opt.4(4), 310–312 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1088/1464-4266/4/4/312 . Special issue

    work page doi:10.1088/1464-4266/4/4/312 2002

  62. [62]

    Meunier, T., Gleyzes, S., Maioli, P., Auffeves, A., Nogues, G., Brune, M., Raimond, J.M., Haroche, S.: Rabi oscillations revival induced by time rever- sal: a test of mesoscopic quantum coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett.94(1) (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.010401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.010401 2005

  63. [63]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.20952 (2026) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.20952

    Wang, Y.-X., Salvati, F., Arvidsson-Shukur, D.R., Braasch Jr, W.F., Murch, K., Halpern, N.Y.: Quantum metrology enhanced by effective time reversal. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.20952 (2026) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.20952

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.20952 2026

  64. [64]

    Anders, F., Pezzè, L., Smerzi, A., Klempt, C.: Phase magnification by two-axis countertwisting for detection-noise robust interferometry. Phys. Rev. A97(4), 043813 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.043813

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.97.043813 2018

  65. [65]

    Mirkhalaf, S.S., Nolan, S.P., Haine, S.A.: Robustifying twist-and-turn entan- glement with interaction-based readout. Phys. Rev. A97(5) (2018) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.053618 28

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.97.053618 2018

  66. [66]

    ComptesRendus.Physique23,1–26(2022)https://doi.org/10.5802/crphys.103

    Baamara, Y., Sinatra, A., Gessner, M.: Squeezing of nonlinear spin observ- ables by one axis twisting in the presence of decoherence: An analytical study. ComptesRendus.Physique23,1–26(2022)https://doi.org/10.5802/crphys.103

    work page doi:10.5802/crphys.103 2022

  67. [67]

    Lewis-Swan,R.J.,Barberena,D.,Muniz,J.A.,Cline,J.R.K.,Young,D.,Thomp- son, J.K., Rey, A.M.: Protocol for precise field sensing in the optical domain with cold atoms in a cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 193602 (2020) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.193602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.193602 2020

  68. [68]

    Science364(6446), 1163–1165 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.aaw2884

    Burd, S.C., Srinivas, R., Bollinger, J.J., Wilson, A.C., Wineland, D.J., Leibfried, D., Slichter, D.H., Allcock, D.T.C.: Quantum amplification of mechanical oscil- lator motion. Science364(6446), 1163–1165 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.aaw2884

    2019

  69. [69]

    Nature, 740–745 (2023) https://doi.org/10

    Franke, J., Muleady, S.R., Kaubruegger, R., Kranzl, F., Blatt, R., Rey, A.M., Joshi, M.K., Roos, C.F.: Quantum-enhanced sensing on optical transitions through finite-range interactions. Nature, 740–745 (2023) https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41586-023-06472-z

    2023

  70. [70]

    Zhang, Z., Duan, L.M.: Quantum metrology with dicke squeezed states. New J. Phys.16(10), 103037 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/16/10/103037

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/10/103037 2014

  71. [71]

    Lücke, B., Peise, J., Vitagliano, G., Arlt, J., Santos, L., Tóth, G., Klempt, C.: Detecting multiparticle entanglement of dicke states. Phys. Rev. Lett.112(15), 155304 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.155304

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.155304 2014

  72. [72]

    Science334(6057), 773–776 (2011) https://doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1208798

    Lücke, B., Scherer, M., Kruse, J., Pezzé, L., Deuretzbacher, F., Hyllus, P., Topic, O., Peise, J., Ertmer, W., Arlt, J.,et al.: Twin matter waves for interferometry beyond the classical limit. Science334(6057), 773–776 (2011) https://doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1208798

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1208798 2011

  73. [73]

    Kessler, E.M., Komar, P., Bishof, M., Jiang, L., Sørensen, A.S., Ye, J., Lukin, M.D.: Heisenberg-limited atom clocks based on entangled qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett.112(19), 190403 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.190403

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.190403 2014

  74. [74]

    Gessner, M., Smerzi, A., Pezzè, L.: Metrological nonlinear squeezing parameter. Phys. Rev. Lett.122(9), 090503 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 122.090503

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2019

  75. [75]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.06308 (2026) https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2602.06308

    Carrasco, S.C., Goerz, M.H., Li, Z., Colombo, S., Vuletić, V., Schleich, W.P., Malinovsky, V.S.: Time-reversal interferometry using cat states with scalable entangling resources. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.06308 (2026) https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2602.06308

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.06308 2026

  76. [76]

    Butterfly Echo Protocol for Axis-Agnostic Heisenberg-Limited Metrology

    Bringewatt, J., Zaporski, L., Radzihovsky, M., Albert, J., Gorshkov, A.V., Vuletić, V., Bentsen, G.: Butterfly echo protocol for axis-agnostic heisenberg- limited metrology. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.23332 (2026) https://doi.org/10. 29 48550/arXiv.2602.23332

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  77. [77]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.16026 (2026) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.16026

    Liu, D.-S., Chen, Z.-J., Hua, Z., Zhou, Y., Jie, Q.-X., Cai, W., Li, M., Sun, L., Zou, C.-L., Ren, X.-F.,et al.: Echoed random quantum metrology. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.16026 (2026) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.16026

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.16026 2026

  78. [78]

    Shao, L., Xing, H.-J., Fu, L.: Enhanced quantum metrology via saddle-point scrambling in phase space. Phys. Rev. Lett.136(18), 180203 (2026) https:// doi.org/10.1103/4sn5-ngdg

    work page doi:10.1103/4sn5-ngdg 2026

  79. [79]

    Gärttner, M., Bohnet, J.G., Safavi-Naini, A., Wall, M.L., Bollinger, J.J., Rey, A.M.: Measuring out-of-time-order correlations and multiple quantum spectra in a trapped-ion quantum magnet. Nat. Phys.13(8), 781–786 (2017) https: //doi.org/10.1038/nphys4119

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys4119 2017

  80. [80]

    Escher, B., Matos Filho, R.L., Davidovich, L.: General framework for estimating the ultimate precision limit in noisy quantum-enhanced metrology. Nat. Phys. 7(5), 406–411 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1958

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys1958 2011

Showing first 80 references.