Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 29 references

CRT is not a gauge symmetry of quantum gravity in general; it is only asymptotic in flat and AdS spaces, and broken by realistic cosmologies.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-12 04:10 UTC pith:VCCWC57K

load-bearing objection Clean negative answer for flat/AdS CRT; the dS Alice-string claim is only a sketch and the cosmology parts recycle the author's prior framework. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.03199 v1 pith:VCCWC57K submitted 2026-07-03 hep-th gr-qc

Singularities, Entropy and the Arrow of Time, {it or} Is CRT a Gauge Symmetry in Quantum Gravity?

T. Banks This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qc
keywords CRTquantum gravitygauge symmetryde Sitter spacethermofield doublecausal diamondsarrow of timesingularities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper asks whether the discrete transformation CRT is a true gauge symmetry of quantum gravity and answers no, once the phrase is made precise in concrete settings. In asymptotically flat and AdS models it behaves like an asymptotic gauge symmetry: it acts non-trivially on the boundary Hilbert space in the same way continuous isometries and internal symmetries do. In eternal de Sitter space the global geometry can be read as a thermofield double of a single static patch; CRT then looks like a spontaneously broken gauge symmetry only if an Alice-string defect is admitted and the Hamiltonian is taken to be time-independent. In cosmologies that begin with a genuine Big Bang, initial conditions that force small uncorrelated causal diamonds break CRT outright, while future singularities are re-interpreted as local equilibration with horizons. The practical upshot is that the arrow of time is built into the quantum initial conditions rather than into a gauged discrete symmetry, and that finite-entropy de Sitter detectors cannot verify either the static Killing vector or CRT with arbitrary precision.

Core claim

CRT is not a gauge symmetry of quantum gravity in general. It is an asymptotic gauge symmetry in asymptotically flat and AdS space, acting on the boundary Hilbert space exactly as continuous isometries and scalar charges do. In eternal de Sitter it can be viewed as spontaneously broken only if an Alice d-3 brane is allowed inside the thermofield-double Hilbert space and the underlying quantum mechanics is time-independent; in realistic Big Bang cosmologies the symmetry is simply absent because initial conditions force small uncorrelated causal diamonds.

What carries the argument

The hydrodynamic dictionary that equates each Lorentzian vacuum Einstein solution with the empty-diamond state of a quantum system, together with the modular-Hamiltonian relation ⟨K⟩ = Var(K) = A/4G_N. Nested causal diamonds then supply a causal time-evolution operator whose modular entropy always increases into the future, fixing the arrow of time without a gauged CRT.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that closed universes whose largest causal diamond has finite area are described by finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, so no bulk detector can ever verify the static Killing vector or CRT with arbitrary precision.

What would settle it

Construct a controlled sequence of de Sitter models whose cosmological constant tends to zero and check whether the single-patch CRT operator converges to the asymptotic CRT of the flat-space limit; any persistent non-asymptotic gauging or residual bulk action would contradict the paper.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper asks whether CRT is a gauge symmetry of quantum gravity, after first delimiting the frameworks in which the question can be posed. In asymptotically flat and AdS settings it concludes that CRT is an asymptotic gauge symmetry, acting non-trivially on the boundary Hilbert space in the same way as continuous Poincaré/AdS isometries and scalar internal symmetries. For eternal de Sitter space it argues that CRT can be viewed as a spontaneously broken gauge symmetry only if an “Alice d-3 brane” (a co-dimension-two defect whose holonomy implements CRT) is admitted as a state in the thermofield-double Hilbert space of a single static patch; this requires an extension of the Chern-Simons formulation of 2+1-dimensional gravity that is only sketched. The same interpretation is said to make sense solely when the underlying quantum mechanics is time-independent. Using a hydrodynamic reading of Einstein gravity (modular Hamiltonians equal to area/4G_N, covariant entropy bound, frozen q-bits tracking localized excitations), the paper further claims that realistic Big-Bang cosmologies have no CRT symmetry at all: initial singularities are simply the breakdown of hydrodynamics for uncorrelated small diamonds, while future singularities correspond to equilibration of local detectors with horizons. Finally, finite-area causal diamonds are conjectured to imply finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, rendering the existence of a static Killing vector or of CRT in principle untestable by bulk

Significance. If the asymptotic-symmetry claims for flat and AdS space are accepted, they place CRT on the same footing as other well-understood asymptotic symmetries and thereby clarify a recurring question in the recent literature. The hydrodynamic account of singularities and the arrow of time offers a coherent, if non-standard, microscopic picture that unifies cosmological and black-hole singularities as places where hydrodynamics fails. The finite-Hilbert-space conjecture, if true, would have far-reaching consequences for the testability of any dS model. The paper does not, however, supply machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or new parameter-free predictions; its principal technical novelty—the Alice-string construction—remains incomplete.

major comments (3)
  1. Section 2 asserts that CRT can be regarded as a spontaneously broken gauge symmetry of eternal dS once an Alice d-3 brane is allowed in the TFD Hilbert space. The text notes that the conventional Chern-Simons action for 2+1 dS gravity is not invariant under the CRT extension of SO(3,1) and therefore “would have to be extended to allow for defects that performed CRT and complex conjugated the gauge fields.” No extended action is written, no equations of motion are checked, and no demonstration is given that the defect is a consistent solution that can be embedded as a state of the TFD. Without that construction the spontaneous-breaking claim remains an unproven postulate rather than a demonstrated possibility.
  2. Section 4 (and the abstract) rests the claim that the gauging question is in principle untestable inside dS on the conjecture that closed-universe geometries with finite maximal causal-diamond area correspond to finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. The conjecture is cited from earlier work but is not re-derived or subjected to any new consistency check in the present manuscript. Because the untestability argument is load-bearing for the paper’s final assessment of CRT in dS, the conjecture needs either a sharper statement of its assumptions or an explicit acknowledgment that the conclusion is conditional on it.
  3. Section 3 imports the entire hydrodynamic framework (modular Hamiltonians equal to area/4G_N, frozen q-bits, CEB-based entropy decrease for localized excitations) from the author’s prior papers without restating the key assumptions or indicating which of them are essential for the CRT conclusion. A reader who does not already accept that framework cannot evaluate whether the claim that “CRT is simply not a symmetry of any kind” in realistic cosmologies follows or is merely restated.
minor comments (4)
  1. The title’s double formulation (“Singularities… or Is CRT…”) is slightly awkward; a single, declarative title would improve clarity.
  2. Several arXiv identifiers in the reference list appear incomplete or placeholder-like (e.g., [25] “arXiv:2607.xxxxx”); these should be updated or removed before publication.
  3. The phrase “Aliced-3 brane” is used without a hyphen or space in places; consistent notation (Alice d-3 brane) would help.
  4. Section 1 asserts that internal symmetries of QG are asymptotic gauge symmetries; a brief pointer to the precise theorem or reference would aid non-specialist readers.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged

CRT conclusions for cosmologies and dS untestability rest on load-bearing self-citations to the author's hydrodynamic framework and finite-Hilbert-space conjecture, without independent re-derivation

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Section 3 (hydrodynamic view and modular Hamiltonian)]
    "Let us quickly sketch the hydrodynamic view of quantum gravity, which follows from the work of [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19]. ... the modular Hamiltonian of the density matrix in each diamond, in the empty diamond state, satisfies ⟨K⋄⟩=⟨(K ⋄ − ⟨K⋄⟩)2⟩= A⋄/4GN . ... The future directed time evolution always has the expectation value of the modular Hamiltonian increasing."

    The entire interpretive apparatus equating diamond modular Hamiltonians (and their fluctuations) to area/4G_N, half-sided modular inclusion for time evolution, and entropy increase is taken wholesale from the cited prior works (several by the author). The subsequent claim that CRT is not a symmetry in cosmologies is then deduced from this apparatus; the load-bearing premises are not independently established in the present paper.

  2. self citation load bearing [Section 3 (Big Bang singularities and arrow of time)]
    "Cosmological Big Bang singularities are simply places where a description of the very earliest universe in terms of a set of non-interacting systems, each of which contains only a few q-bits, is appropriate, and the hydrodynamic description breaks down. In [22] we showed how a large class of such small systems, with fairly random dynamics, could merge into the flat p=ρ FRW universe ... With these microscopic models ... CRT is simply not a symmetry of any kind. It is intrinsically broken by the fact that we’ve imposed initial conditions on the quantum system that respect causality: small causal"

    The identification of the Big Bang with uncorrelated few-q-bit systems (which breaks CRT by construction of the initial conditions) and the claim that the most probable geometry is flat FRW are justified solely by the author's prior result [22]. The 'not a symmetry at all' conclusion for realistic cosmologies therefore reduces to acceptance of that self-cited model rather than a new derivation.

  3. self citation load bearing [Section 4 (finite Hilbert spaces and untestability)]
    "If one accepts the conjecture [26] that closed universe geometries with causal diamonds of finite maximal area correspond to quantum systems with finite dimensional Hilbert spaces, then it is impossible to make similar precise statements about symmetries for such systems. ... So no mathematical theory of a universe with only finite area causal diamonds can ever be tested experimentally with any sort of precision, by measurements inside that universe. ... we can modify any theory of dS space ... without fear of contradiction ... these in principle unmeasurable terms can violate any symmetry we"

    The central 'issue of principle'—that CRT and the static Hamiltonian are in-principle untestable inside dS, so the gauging question can be freely modified—rests entirely on the author's own conjecture [26]. Without that self-cited premise the untestability argument (and the consequent freedom to break or gauge CRT) does not follow; the load-bearing step is therefore circular via self-citation.

full rationale

The paper is largely conceptual and does not contain fitted parameters, self-definitional equations, or uniqueness theorems that force results by construction; the asymptotic-flat/AdS claims are standard and independent. However, the general answer 'NO' and the treatments of realistic cosmologies (CRT intrinsically broken by initial conditions) and eternal dS (untestable symmetries, free modifications) are obtained by reading off consequences from the author's prior hydrodynamic QG program (modular Hamiltonians = area/4G_N, frozen q-bits, Big-Bang as uncorrelated small diamonds, future singularities as equilibration) and the finite-dimensional Hilbert-space conjecture. These are imported via self-citations that supply the load-bearing premises rather than being re-derived or externally verified here. This is partial circularity of the self-citation-load-bearing kind, not a full tautology; score is therefore moderate (5) rather than 0 or 8+.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 1 invented entities

The paper rests on a large set of domain assumptions drawn from the holographic-spacetime program and on one new postulated defect (the Alice string). No free parameters are fitted to data; the free parameters that appear are those already present in the low-dimensional models the author cites. The finite-dimensional Hilbert-space conjecture for finite-area diamonds is the single most load-bearing unproved axiom.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Closed-universe geometries whose causal diamonds have finite maximal area correspond to quantum systems with finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces.
    Invoked in §4 to conclude that no bulk detector can verify CRT or the static Killing vector with arbitrary precision; cited as conjecture [26].
  • domain assumption The modular Hamiltonian of the empty-diamond density matrix satisfies ⟨K⟩ = ⟨(K-⟨K⟩)²⟩ = A/4G_N (and the associated half-sided modular inclusion construction of time evolution).
    Taken as the hydrodynamic dictionary of quantum gravity (§3); imported from the author’s prior work without new derivation.
  • domain assumption Localized excitations inside a causal diamond reduce the entropy relative to the empty-diamond state (covariant entropy bound).
    Used to identify black-hole and crunch singularities with equilibration; standard CEB assumption but load-bearing for the arrow-of-time claims.
  • domain assumption Global dS geometry is merely a description of the thermofield-double state of a single static-patch quantum system.
    Central to the interpretation of CRT as a TFD swap rather than a gauge symmetry of the physical system (§2).
  • domain assumption Quantum gravity admits no global 0-form symmetries, so the C part of CRT is automatically gauged once spatial sections are compact.
    Used to argue that the C factor is a gauge symmetry in closed universes; extrapolated from the asymptotic flat/AdS lore.
invented entities (1)
  • Alice d-3 brane (Alice string) whose holonomy implements CRT no independent evidence
    purpose: To realize CRT as a spontaneously broken gauge symmetry inside the thermofield-double Hilbert space of eternal dS.
    Introduced in §2; requires an extension of Chern-Simons gravity that is only sketched and has no independent experimental or lattice handle outside the paper’s interpretive framework.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 14113 in / 3307 out tokens · 34081 ms · 2026-07-12T04:10:50.658613+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We examine the question of whether the discrete transformation CRT is a gauge symmetry of ``Quantum Gravity". Since the phrase in quotes is not yet completely well defined, we first try to define specific frameworks in which one might ask the question. We find that the general answer is NO. In asymptotically flat and AdS spaces, CRT is an asymptotic gauge symmetry in the same sense that the continuous parts of the Poincare/AdS isometry groups and scalar internal symmetries are. In eternal dS space it can be considered a spontaneously broken gauge symmetry if a certain ``Alice String" configuration is allowed in the Thermofield double Hilbert space. This requires an extension of the conventional Chern-Simons rewriting of $2 + 1$ dimensional gravity. This interpretation only makes sense if we consider the underlying quantum mechanics to be time independent. General quantum measurement and semi-classical gravitational restrictions on measuring devices put {\it a priori} limits on the existence of detectors with clocks that can actually measure proper time along a classical dS geodesic.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,

    O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz, “Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,” Phys. Rept.323, 183-386 (2000) doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00083- 6 [arXiv:hep-th/9905111 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(99)00083- 2000

  2. [2]

    Proposals on nonperturbative superstring inter- actions,

    T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. H. Shenker and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D55, 5112-5128 (1997) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.55.5112 [arXiv:hep-th/9610043 [hep-th]]; R. Dijkgraaf, E. P. Verlinde and H. L. Verlinde, Nucl. Phys. B500, 43-61 (1997) doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00326-X [arXiv:hep-th/9703030 [hep-th]]; L. Motl, “Proposals on nonperturbative superstring inter- act...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.55.5112 1997

  3. [3]

    Gauging spacetime inversions in quantum gravity,

    D. Harlow and T. Numasawa, “Gauging spacetime inversions in quantum gravity,” JHEP 01, 098 (2026) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2026)098 [arXiv:2311.09978 [hep-th]]; E. Witten,“Bras and kets in Euclidean path integrals,” Beijing J. Pure Appl. Math.3, no.1, 1-34 (2026) doi:10.4310/bpam.260113013520 [arXiv:2503.12771 [hep-th]]; J. Y. Cheng,“CRT gauge sym- metry in two...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep01(2026)098 2026

  4. [4]

    Quantum Field Theory in de Sitter Space: Renormalization by Point Splitting,

    T. S. Bunch and P. C. W. Davies, “Quantum Field Theory in de Sitter Space: Renormalization by Point Splitting,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A360, 117-134 (1978) doi:10.1098/rspa.1978.0060

    doi:10.1098/rspa.1978.0060 1978

  5. [5]

    Disturbing implications of a cosmological constant,

    L. Dyson, M. Kleban and L. Susskind, “Disturbing implications of a cosmological constant,” JHEP10, 011 (2002) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/10/011 [arXiv:hep-th/0208013 [hep-th]]. 7

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/10/011 2002

  6. [6]

    Thermo field dynamics of black holes,

    W. Israel, “Thermo field dynamics of black holes,” Phys. Lett. A57, 107-110 (1976) doi:10.1016/0375-9601(76)90178-X

    doi:10.1016/0375-9601(76)90178-x 1976

  7. [7]

    Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,

    J. M. Maldacena, “Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,” JHEP04, 021 (2003) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/04/021 [arXiv:hep-th/0106112 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/04/021 2003

  8. [8]

    Elliptic de Sitter space: dS/Z(2),

    M. K. Parikh, I. Savonije and E. P. Verlinde, “Elliptic de Sitter space: dS/Z(2),” Phys. Rev. D67, 064005 (2003) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.67.064005 [arXiv:hep-th/0209120 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.67.064005 2003

  9. [9]

    de Sitter Vacua, Renormalization and Locality

    T. Banks and L. Mannelli, “De Sitter vacua, renormalization and locality,” Phys. Rev. D67, 065009 (2003) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.67.065009 [arXiv:hep-th/0209113 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.67.065009 2003

  10. [10]

    Is Time Reversal in de Sitter Space a Spontaneously Broken Gauge Symmetry?,

    L. Susskind, “Is Time Reversal in de Sitter Space a Spontaneously Broken Gauge Symmetry?,” [arXiv:2603.12434 [hep-th]]; L. Susskind, “More About the Spontaneous Breaking of Time Reversal in de Sitter Space,” JHAP6, no.4, 1-15 (2026) doi:10.22128/jhap.2026.3250.1192 [arXiv:2601.01666 [hep-th]]; L. Susskind, “Why do we Need Observers? Spontaneous Breaking o...

    work page doi:10.22128/jhap.2026.3250.1192 2026

  11. [11]

    Is Time Reversal in de Sitter Space a Spontaneously Broken Gauge Symmetry?,

    L. Susskind, “Is Time Reversal in de Sitter Space a Spontaneously Broken Gauge Symmetry?,” [arXiv:2603.12434 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  12. [12]

    T C P, Quantum Gravity, the Cosmological Constant and All That...,

    T. Banks, “T C P, Quantum Gravity, the Cosmological Constant and All That...,” Nucl. Phys. B249, 332-360 (1985) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90020-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90020-3 1985

  13. [13]

    Thermodynamics of space-time: The Einstein equation of state,

    T. Jacobson, “Thermodynamics of space-time: The Einstein equation of state,” Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 1260-1263 (1995) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1260 [arXiv:gr-qc/9504004 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.1260 1995

  14. [14]

    Black hole entropy from conformal field theory in any dimension,

    S. Carlip, “Black hole entropy from conformal field theory in any dimension,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2828-2831 (1999) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2828 [arXiv:hep-th/9812013 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.2828 1999

  15. [15]

    Conformal description of horizon’s states,

    S. N. Solodukhin, “Conformal description of horizon’s states,” Phys. Lett. B454, 213-222 (1999) doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00398-6 [arXiv:hep-th/9812056 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(99)00398-6 1999

  16. [16]

    Holography and cosmology,

    W. Fischler and L. Susskind,“Holography and cosmology,” [arXiv:hep-th/9806039 [hep-th]]; R. Bousso, “A Covariant entropy conjecture,” JHEP07, 004 (1999) doi:10.1088/1126- 6708/1999/07/004 [arXiv:hep-th/9905177 [hep-th]]. R. Bousso, “Holography in general space- times,” JHEP06, 028 (1999) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/06/028 [arXiv:hep-th/9906022 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126- 1999

  17. [17]

    Conformal description of near-horizon vacuum states,

    T. Banks and K. M. Zurek, “Conformal description of near-horizon vacuum states,” Phys. Rev. D104, no.12, 126026 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.126026 [arXiv:2108.04806 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.126026 2021

  18. [18]

    TASI Lectures on Holographic Space-Time, SUSY and Gravitational Effective Field Theory,

    T. Banks, “TASI Lectures on Holographic Space-Time, SUSY and Gravitational Effective Field Theory,” [arXiv:1007.4001 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    Hilbert Bundles and Holographic Space-time: the Hydrodynamic Approach to Gravity,

    T. Banks, “Hilbert Bundles and Holographic Space-time: the Hydrodynamic Approach to Gravity,” [arXiv:2502.04924 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    Heretics of the False Vacuum: Gravitational Effects On and Of Vacuum Decay 2

    T. Banks,“Heretics of the false vacuum: Gravitational effects on and of vacuum decay. 2.,” [arXiv:hep-th/0211160 [hep-th]]; T. Banks and M. Johnson, “Regulating eternal inflation,” [arXiv:hep-th/0512141 [hep-th]]. A. Aguirre, T. Banks and M. Johnson, “Regulating eternal inflation. II. The Great divide,” JHEP08, 065 (2006) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/08/065...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/08/065 2006

  21. [21]

    Thermal derivation of the Coleman-De Luccia tunneling prescription

    A. R. Brown and E. J. Weinberg, “Thermal derivation of the Coleman-De Luccia tunneling pre- scription,” Phys. Rev. D76, 064003 (2007) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.064003 [arXiv:0706.1573 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.064003 2007

  22. [22]

    Microscopic quantum mechanics of the p = rho universe,

    T. Banks, W. Fischler and L. Mannelli,“Microscopic quantum mechanics of the p = rho universe,” Phys. Rev. D71, 123514 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.123514 [arXiv:hep- th/0408076 [hep-th]]

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.123514 2005

  23. [23]

    Holographic Inflation Revised,

    T. Banks and W. Fischler, “Holographic Inflation Revised,” doi:10.1017/9781316535783.013 [arXiv:1501.01686 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1017/9781316535783.013

  24. [24]

    The holographic space-time model of inflation and its predictions for the CMB primordial spectra

    S. A and T. Banks, “Holographic spacetime model of inflation and its predictions for the CMB primordial spectra,” Phys. Rev. D112, no.2, 023516 (2025) doi:10.1103/xts8-ggmg [arXiv:2502.15108 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/xts8-ggmg 2025

  25. [25]

    Can Primordial Black Holes Be the Seeds for Early Galaxies in Models Satisfying the Covariant Entropy Bound?

    S. A, T. Banks, W. Fischler, “Can Primordial Black Holes Be the Seeds for Early Galaxies in Models Satisfying the Covariant Entropy Bound?”, [arXiv:2607.xxxxx [hep-ph]]. (to appear shortly)

  26. [26]

    Cosmological breaking of supersymmetry?,

    T. Banks, Talk at the Festschrift for L. Susskind, Stanford University, June 2000; W. Fis- chler, ”Taking de Sitter Seriously”, Talk given at Role of Scaling Laws in Physics and Bi- ology (Celebrating the 60th Birthday of Geoffrey West), Santa Fe, Dec. 2000; T. Banks, “Cosmological breaking of supersymmetry?,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A16, 910-921 (2001) doi:10...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0217751x01003998 2000

  27. [27]

    Quantum theory of three-dimensional de Sitter space,

    S. A, T. Banks and W. Fischler, “Quantum theory of three-dimensional de Sitter space,” Phys. Rev. D109, no.2, 025011 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.025011 [arXiv:2306.05264 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.025011 2024

  28. [28]

    JT de Sitter gravity as a model of Coleman-de Luccia tunneling,

    T. Banks and S. A, “JT de Sitter gravity as a model of Coleman-de Luccia tunneling,” JHEP 12, 085 (2025) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2025)085 [arXiv:2506.09283 [hep-th]]

    doi:10.1007/jhep12(2025)085 2025

  29. [29]

    JT Gravity Coupled to Fermions

    T. Banks, P. Draper and B. Zhang, “JT gravity coupled to fermions,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.27, no.2, 483-522 (2023) doi:10.4310/ATMP.2023.v27.n2.a2 [arXiv:2205.07382 [hep-th]]. 9

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.4310/atmp.2023.v27.n2.a2 2023