Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 56 references

Neumann boundary conditions in AdS force different one-loop potentials and phase diagrams than Dirichlet ones, obtained by deforming the spectral contour from Δ+ to Δ−.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-11 19:18 UTC pith:A2RMQY2A

load-bearing objection Solid, reusable contour method for Neumann one-loop determinants plus systematic phase diagrams that differ cleanly from the Dirichlet case. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2607.04417 v1 pith:A2RMQY2A submitted 2026-07-05 hep-th

Neumann scalars in AdS: partition functions and phases

Biki Bishwakarma , Astha Kakkar , Swarnendu Sarkar This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords Neumann boundary conditionAdSone-loop partition functioneffective potentialphase diagramunitarity boundO(N) modelthermal AdS
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Scalar field theories in Anti-de Sitter space can be quantized with either Dirichlet or Neumann boundary conditions; the latter interchange the roles of source and vev in the dual CFT and are allowed only inside a window of masses set by unitarity. This paper shows how to compute the one-loop effective potential for Neumann scalars by deforming the contour that integrates over Laplace eigenvalues, thereby analytically continuing the known Dirichlet formulas from the larger conformal dimension Δ+ to the smaller one Δ−. The resulting potentials, subject to the stricter unitarity bound Δ− ≥ (d−2)/2, produce phase diagrams that differ markedly from the Dirichlet case: symmetry-breaking phases are often inaccessible or unstable, and finite-temperature series convergence further carves out allowed regions. Long-distance correlators confirm the same pattern. A reader interested in AdS/CFT or thermal field theory therefore obtains a concrete map of which phases survive when the boundary condition is flipped.

Core claim

One-loop partition functions for scalars obeying Neumann boundary conditions on AdS are given by the analytic continuation of the Dirichlet expressions from Δ+ to Δ−; this continuation is realized by two explicit contour deformations of the integral over the Laplace eigenvalue λ, and the resulting effective potentials, constrained by unitarity, generate the phase diagrams summarized in the paper’s Table 1.

What carries the argument

Contour deformations of the spectral integral over the Laplace eigenvalue λ (Prescriptions 1 and 2 of §2.1) that replace the real-line contour used for Dirichlet with paths that pick up the residues corresponding to Δ−.

Load-bearing premise

The deformed contours are assumed to give the correct one-loop determinant even though the Neumann bulk-to-bulk propagator is not square-integrable on AdS.

What would settle it

An independent evaluation of the Neumann one-loop determinant (for example by heat-kernel methods or by direct regularization of the non-normalizable modes) that fails to match the analytic continuation Δ+ o Δ− would falsify the central computational claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper computes one-loop partition functions for free scalars in Euclidean and thermal AdS_{d+1} with Neumann boundary conditions by deforming the spectral contour for the Laplace eigenvalue λ (Prescriptions 1 and 2 in §2.1) so that the result is the analytic continuation of the known Dirichlet expressions from Δ_{+} to Δ_{-}. The resulting effective potentials are used to map phases of a single φ^{4} scalar, the O(N) vector model, and its large-N limit in AdS_{2} through AdS_{5} at zero and finite temperature. Unitarity (Δ_{-} ≥ (d-2)/2) and, at finite T, series-convergence constraints restrict the allowed region relative to the Dirichlet case of arXiv:2201.09043; the resulting phase diagrams are summarized in Table 1 and checked against the long-distance decay (or non-decay) of two-point correlators in §3.4.

Significance. The work supplies a concrete, reusable computational route from the Dirichlet spectral representation to Neumann one-loop determinants, verified by two independent contours and by matching the zero-temperature formula of Carmi et al. The phase diagrams of Table 1 are new and systematically different from the Dirichlet counterparts; the correlator analysis of §3.4 provides an independent consistency check. The results are of direct interest for AdS/CFT studies of alternate quantization, boundary RG flows, and thermal phases of bulk scalars.

major comments (1)
  1. The contour deformations of Figs. 1–2 (and the equivalent Δ_{+} o Δ_{-} continuation) are justified by matching special-function identities and the Carmi et al. formula (eq. 2.26), but are not derived from a first-principles spectral theorem for the non-square-integrable Neumann Laplacian. While this is a genuine limitation of the method, the internal consistency of the two prescriptions and the independent correlator check in §3.4 make it non-blocking for the central claim; a short clarifying paragraph in §2 would still be useful.
minor comments (4)
  1. Table 1 lists AdS_{2}–AdS_{4} but omits AdS_{5} even though expressions for AdS_{5} appear in §3.1.4, §3.2.4 and §3.3.4; either add a row or note that the AdS_{5} phases follow the same pattern.
  2. In §3.1.1 the renormalization condition (3.37) and the subsequent integral (3.40) discard an infinite constant; a one-sentence remark that this constant is scheme-dependent and does not affect the location of extrema would improve clarity.
  3. Figures 3–10 would benefit from larger axis labels and a uniform colour convention for the Neumann versus Dirichlet panels.
  4. A few typographical slips: “Neuman” (p. 14), “potenatial” (p. 26), and the inconsistent use of V_{3} versus V_{5} in the AdS_{5} finite-T formula (3.65).

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No significant circularity: Neumann traces follow from independent contour deformations checked against external formulae; phases are parameter scans, not fits.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [§2 intro and §2.1 (eqs. 2.9–2.13, comparison to [47])]
    "This is realized by deforming the contour for the eigenvalue λ (of the Laplace operator) integral in the evaluation presented in [47]. This equates to an analytical continuation from Δ+ to Δ− in the expressions for Z(1) as compared to the results in [47]."

    The spectral integral representation itself is taken from the authors’ prior Dirichlet paper. However the circularity is only minor: the Neumann result is obtained by an independent residue calculation on a deformed contour, and the output is verified against external formulae (Carmi et al., Gradshteyn–Ryzhik identities). The self-citation therefore supplies the starting integral, not the final answer.

full rationale

The derivation chain begins from the spectral representation of the Laplace operator (eqs. 2.7–2.9), which is standard and shared with the authors’ prior Dirichlet work [47]. The load-bearing step for Neumann is the pair of contour deformations in §2.1 (Prescriptions 1 and 2, Figs. 1–2). These are new calculations: residues of the Gamma poles and the λ = ±iν poles are evaluated explicitly, yielding the analytically continued trace (2.19) and (2.26). The result is cross-checked against the known zero-temperature formula of Carmi et al. and against special-function identities (2.20)–(2.25); the two independent prescriptions agree with each other. Thermal traces (2.29)–(2.32) and Appendix A follow by the same contour choice applied to the quotient-space eigenfunctions. Effective potentials are then assembled from these traces plus the classical V(ϕ_cl); extrema are located by direct differentiation and numerical root-finding over free parameters (m², L, λ, β, N). No parameters are fitted to external data, and the unitarity bound Δ_− ≥ (d−2)/2 is an independent CFT constraint, not derived from the phase diagrams themselves. Long-distance correlators (§3.4) supply a further consistency check that uses the standard bulk-to-bulk propagator (3.108) rather than the partition-function results. The only self-citation is the reuse of the Dirichlet spectral setup and the comparison plots; it is not load-bearing for the Neumann formulae or the reported phases. Hence the central claims do not reduce by construction to their inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on standard spectral theory of the Laplacian on AdS, the known Dirichlet one-loop determinants, the BF and unitarity bounds of AdS/CFT, and ordinary renormalization of scalar effective potentials. No new particles or forces are postulated. The only free parameters are the usual couplings and scales that are scanned to produce phase diagrams; none are fitted to external data.

free parameters (4)
  • quartic coupling λ
    Scanned over O(0.1–1) values to generate representative phase plots; not fitted to data.
  • mass-squared m² and AdS radius L
    Axes of the phase diagrams; free parameters of the classical potential.
  • inverse temperature β
    Scanned to produce finite-temperature phase plots; no data fit.
  • renormalization scale μ (MS scheme, AdS2 O(N))
    Appears only in one scheme comparison; chosen by hand.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The one-loop determinant for a free scalar is (1/2) Tr log(−□ + M²), evaluated via the spectral measure of the Laplacian on Euclidean AdS.
    Standard QFT on curved space; used throughout §2.
  • domain assumption Unitarity of the dual CFT requires Δ− ≥ (d−2)/2, which translates into an upper bound on the effective mass squared for Neumann quantization.
    Standard AdS/CFT dictionary (Klebanov-Witten); invoked to restrict phase space in every dimension.
  • ad hoc to paper The contour deformations of Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 correctly capture the contribution of the non-normalizable Neumann modes.
    Justified by matching known identities and the Carmi et al. formula, but not derived from a spectral theorem for the Neumann Laplacian.
  • standard math Finite-temperature series converge only when β(d/2 − ν) > 0.
    Ordinary absolute-convergence requirement of the thermal sum; used to exclude M² = 0 in large-N models.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 36128 in / 2774 out tokens · 34615 ms · 2026-07-11T19:18:59.664476+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present an analysis of one-loop partition functions for scalars in AdS$_{d+1}$ obeying the Neumann boundary condition and explore phases of scalar field theories in several dimensions at zero and finite temperature. The partition function computation involves an analytic continuation from $\Delta_+$ corresponding to the Dirichlet boundary condition to $\Delta_-$ corresponding to Neumann boundary condition. We show that this can be implemented by deformations of the contour for integral over eigenvalue ($\lambda$) of the Laplace operator as compared to the integral over ${\mathbb R}$ in [arXiv:2201.09043] for the Dirichlet boundary condition. We further contrast these phases with those appearing for the case of scalars obeying the Dirichlet boundary condition and corroborate the occurrence of these phases by studying the long range behaviour of correlators.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.04417 by Astha Kakkar, Biki Bishwakarma, Swarnendu Sarkar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: contour 1 2.1.2 Prescription 2 Another representation of the trace can obtained by using the following identities [56](see also [14]): Kiλ(ky) = π 2 I−iλ(ky) − Iiλ(ky) isinh(πλ) (2.20) and for y < y′ , I−iλ(ky)Kiλ(ky′ ) = Z ∞ 0 ds 2s e −k 2s e − y 2+y ′2 4s I−iλ  yy′ 2s  = Z ∞ 0 ds 2s e −k 2s e − y 2+y ′2 4s 1 2πi Z ∞+iπ ∞−iπ dt exp  yy′ 2s cosh(t) + iλt (2.21) thus we can write 1 L2 tr  1 −□E + V ′′(… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Contour 2 2.2 Thermal AdS Using the contour prescription shown in figure 2 we give the results for thermal AdS below. The details of the computations which are essentially adaptation of the computation in [47] are given in appendix A. Thermal AdS3 is defined as the quotient space H3/Z with the metric ds2 = L 2 y 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: AdS2 single scalar: (a) Zero temperature m2 − L phase plot for Neumann (Dirichlet) boundary condition with λ = 0.4 (b) Shows a point m2 = −0.5, L = 0.5, λ = 0.4 for Neumann boundary condition when the ϕcl ̸= 0 roots satisfy the unitarity bound. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: AdS2 single scalar: Phases and potentials for Neumann boundary condition and L = 0.4, λ = 0.4 and n = 10. The potential plots are shown for regions A, B and C. Figure (5a) shows the m2 − β phase plot for low temperatures (high β values). Figure (5b) shows the m2 − L phase plot for various values of β. It may be noted that the boundary separating the regions B−C shifts with decreasing β thereby shrinking th… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: AdS2 single scalar: (a) The m2 vs β phase plot for Neumann boundary condition asymptotes to the zero temperature case for high β and λ = 0.4, L = 1 (b) The m2 vs L phase plot for Neumann boundary condition for various values of β and λ = 0.4 3.1.2 AdS3 We shall now consider the theory on AdS3. Thus setting d = 2 in (2.26) gives 1 2L2 tr  1 −□E + V ′′(ϕcl)  = V3 L3 √ 1 + M2L2 8π (3.43) Note that while the… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: AdS3 single scalar: Zero temperature m2 −L phase plot for (a) Dirichlet and (b) Neumann boundary conditions with λ = 0.5 Finite Temperature: At finite temperature we get a phase plot with features and potential plots similar to AdS2 figure 4. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: b shows a plot of 1 ϕcl ∂V (ϕcl) ∂ϕcl and M2L 2 versus ϕcl. The derivative of the potential has infinite number of disconnected branches with corresponding zeros coming from the tan function. Now the central curve also does not satisfy the unitarity bound. Finite Temperature: The symmetry preserving phase observed at finite temperature is unstable as M2 = 0 cannot be accessed due to the unitarity bound. (a… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: AdS2 O(N) model: Phase plots with λ = 0.4, L = 0.4 at zero temperature for (a) Neumann boundary condition and (b) Dirichlet boundary condition 3.2.2 AdS3 Similar to the case of the single scalar theory, where the trace is given by (3.43), the leading contribution to the effective potential for the O(N) vector model including the expression for the partition function (2.30) can be written as Vef f (ϕcl) = 1… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: AdS3 O(N) model: Phase plots for m2 vs N with λ = 0.5, L = 0.8 for (a) Neumann boundary condition (b) Dirichlet boundary condition. 3.2.3 AdS4 Expanding the expression for the trace at zero temperature around d = 3 gives 1 Vd+1L2 tr 1 −□ + M2 i = (2 + M2 i ) 16π 2L3  − 2 ϵ − 1 + γ − log(4π) + ψ (0)  ν(M2 i L 2 ) − 1 2  + ψ (0)  ν(M2 i L 2 ) + 3 2  # (3.74) where ν(M2 i ) = q 9/4 + M2 i L2 and ϵ = 3 − … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: AdS3 large N: Zero temperature m2 − L phase plot for (a) Dirichlet and (b) Neumann boundary conditions with λ = 1 Finite Temperature: We notice that the above finite temperature series converges only when in the last temperature dependent term we have β(d/2 − ν) > 0 (3.98) and thus requires ν < d/2 or M2 < 0. So series convergence places a stricter constraint than unitarity. Even though in this case the e… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · 12 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    INFRARED BEHAVIOR AT NEGATIVE CURVA- TURE,

    C. G. Callan, Jr. and F. Wilczek, “INFRARED BEHAVIOR AT NEGATIVE CURVA- TURE,” Nucl. Phys. B340(1990), 366-386 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90451-I

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90451-i 1990

  2. [2]

    NAMBU-GOLDSTONE BOSONS IN CURVED SPACE-TIME,

    T. Inami and H. Ooguri, “NAMBU-GOLDSTONE BOSONS IN CURVED SPACE-TIME,” Phys. Lett. B163(1985), 101-105 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)90201-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)90201-1 1985

  3. [3]

    Propagators and Effective Potentials in Anti-de Sitter Space,

    C. P. Burgess and C. A. Lutken, “Propagators and Effective Potentials in Anti-de Sitter Space,” Phys. Lett. B153(1985), 137-141 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)91415-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)91415-7 1985

  4. [4]

    One Loop Effective Potential in Anti-de Sitter Space,

    T. Inami and H. Ooguri, “One Loop Effective Potential in Anti-de Sitter Space,” Prog. Theor. Phys.73(1985), 1051 doi:10.1143/PTP.73.1051

    work page doi:10.1143/ptp.73.1051 1985

  5. [5]

    Massive-Scalar Effective Actions on Anti-de Sitter Spacetime

    M. Kamela and C. P. Burgess, “Massive scalar effective actions on Anti-de Sitter space- time,” Can. J. Phys.77(1999), 85-99 doi:10.1139/cjp-77-2-85 [arXiv:hep-th/9808107 [hep- th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1139/cjp-77-2-85 1999

  6. [6]

    Harmonic analysis and propagators on homogeneous spaces,

    R. Camporesi, “Harmonic analysis and propagators on homogeneous spaces,” Phys. Rept. 196(1990), 1-134 doi:10.1016/0370-1573(90)90120-Q

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(90)90120-q 1990

  7. [7]

    zeta function regularization of one loop effective potentials in anti-de Sitter space-time,

    R. Camporesi, “zeta function regularization of one loop effective potentials in anti-de Sitter space-time,” Phys. Rev. D43(1991), 3958-3965 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.43.3958

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.43.3958 1991

  8. [8]

    Quantum fields and extended objects in space-times with constant curvature spatial section,

    A. A. Bytsenko, G. Cognola, L. Vanzo and S. Zerbini, “Quantum fields and extended objects in space-times with constant curvature spatial section,” Phys. Rept.266(1996), 1-126 doi:10.1016/0370-1573(95)00053-4 [arXiv:hep-th/9505061 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0370-1573(95)00053-4 1996

  9. [9]

    Quantum Scalar Fields on Anti-de Sitter Spacetime

    M. M. Caldarelli, “Quantum scalar fields on anti-de Sitter space-time,” Nucl. Phys. B549 (1999), 499-515 doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00137-6 [arXiv:hep-th/9809144 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(99)00137-6 1999

  10. [10]

    Double trace operators and one loop vacuum energy in AdS / CFT,

    S. S. Gubser and I. Mitra, “Double trace operators and one loop vacuum energy in AdS / CFT,” Phys. Rev. D67(2003), 064018 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.67.064018 [arXiv:hep- th/0210093 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.67.064018 2003

  11. [11]

    Large-order Perturbation Theory and de Sitter/Anti de Sitter Effective Actions,

    A. K. Das and G. V. Dunne, “Large-order Perturbation Theory and de Sitter/Anti de Sitter Effective Actions,” Phys. Rev. D74(2006), 044029 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.044029 [arXiv:hep-th/0607168 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.044029 2006

  12. [12]

    Conformal field theories in anti-de Sitter space

    O. Aharony, D. Marolf and M. Rangamani, “Conformal field theories in anti-de Sitter space,” JHEP02(2011), 041 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2011)041 [arXiv:1011.6144 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2011)041 2011

  13. [13]

    Confinement in Anti-de Sitter Space,

    O. Aharony, M. Berkooz, D. Tong and S. Yankielowicz, “Confinement in Anti-de Sitter Space,” JHEP02(2013), 076 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2013)076 [arXiv:1210.5195 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2013)076 2013

  14. [14]

    Double-Trace Deformations and Entanglement Entropy in AdS

    T. Miyagawa, N. Shiba and T. Takayanagi, “Double-Trace Deformations and Entangle- ment Entropy in AdS,” Fortsch. Phys.64(2016), 92-105 doi:10.1002/prop.201500098 [arXiv:1511.07194 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1002/prop.201500098 2016

  15. [15]

    Entanglement entropy for free scalar fields in AdS,

    S. Sugishita, “Entanglement entropy for free scalar fields in AdS,” JHEP09(2016), 128 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2016)128 [arXiv:1608.00305 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep09(2016)128 2016

  16. [16]

    A Study of Quantum Field Theories in AdS at Finite Coupling,

    D. Carmi, L. Di Pietro and S. Komatsu, “A Study of Quantum Field Theories in AdS at Finite Coupling,” JHEP01(2019), 200 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2019)200 [arXiv:1810.04185 [hep-th]]. 41

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep01(2019)200 2019

  17. [17]

    Snowmass White Paper: S-matrix Bootstrap,

    M. Kruczenski, J. Penedones and B. C. van Rees, “Snowmass White Paper: S-matrix Bootstrap,” [arXiv:2203.02421 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Scalar QED in AdS,

    Ankur, D. Carmi and L. Di Pietro, “Scalar QED in AdS,” JHEP10(2023), 089 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2023)089 [arXiv:2306.05551 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2023)089 2023

  19. [19]

    CFT in AdS and boundary RG flows,

    S. Giombi and H. Khanchandani, “CFT in AdS and boundary RG flows,” JHEP11(2020), 118 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2020)118 [arXiv:2007.04955 [hep-th]]

    doi:10.1007/jhep11(2020)118 2020

  20. [20]

    Fermions in AdS and Gross-Neveu BCFT,

    S. Giombi, E. Helfenberger and H. Khanchandani, “Fermions in AdS and Gross-Neveu BCFT,” JHEP07(2022), 018 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)018 [arXiv:2110.04268 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2022)018 2022

  21. [21]

    Free energy and defectC-theorem in free scalar theory,

    T. Nishioka and Y. Sato, “Free energy and defectC-theorem in free scalar theory,” JHEP 05(2021), 074 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2021)074 [arXiv:2101.02399 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep05(2021)074 2021

  22. [22]

    Loops in AdS: From the Spectral Representation to Position Space,

    D. Carmi, “Loops in AdS: From the Spectral Representation to Position Space,” JHEP06 (2020), 049 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2020)049 [arXiv:1910.14340 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2020)049 2020

  23. [23]

    Loops in AdS: from the spectral representation to position space. Part II,

    D. Carmi, “Loops in AdS: from the spectral representation to position space. Part II,” JHEP07(2021), 186 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2021)186 [arXiv:2104.10500 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2021)186 2021

  24. [24]

    Taming Mass Gaps with Anti–de Sitter Space,

    C. Copetti, L. Di Pietro, Z. Ji and S. Komatsu, “Taming Mass Gaps with Anti–de Sitter Space,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) no.8, 081601 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.081601 [arXiv:2312.09277 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.081601 2024

  25. [25]

    Renormalization group flows in AdS and the bootstrap program,

    M. Meineri, J. Penedones and T. Spirig, “Renormalization group flows in AdS and the bootstrap program,” [arXiv:2305.11209 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    Perturbative RG flows in AdS: an ´ etude,

    E. Lauria, M. Milam and B. C. van Rees, “Perturbative RG flows in AdS: an ´ etude,” [arXiv:2309.10031 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    Exploring confinement in Anti-de Sitter space,

    R. Ciccone, F. De Cesare, L. Di Pietro and M. Serone, “Exploring confinement in Anti-de Sitter space,” JHEP12(2024), 218 [erratum: JHEP06(2025), 037] doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2024)218 [arXiv:2407.06268 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep12(2024)218 2024

  28. [28]

    A Bootstrap Study of Confinement in AdS,

    L. Di Pietro, S. R. Kousvos, M. Meineri, A. Piazza, M. Serone and A. Vichi, “A Bootstrap Study of Confinement in AdS,” [arXiv:2512.00150 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  29. [29]

    QCD in AdS,

    R. Ciccone, F. De Cesare, L. Di Pietro and M. Serone, “QCD in AdS,” JHEP04(2026), 130 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2026)130 [arXiv:2511.04752 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2026)130 2026

  30. [30]

    F-theorem for Quantum Field Theories in Anti-de Sitter Space,

    D. Bason, C. Copetti, L. Di Pietro, Z. Ji and S. Komatsu, “F-theorem for Quantum Field Theories in Anti-de Sitter Space,” [arXiv:2512.18392 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  31. [31]

    N= 2 super Yang-Mills in AdS 4 and FAdS- maximization,

    D. Bason, C. Copetti, L. Di Pietro and Z. Ji, “N= 2 super Yang-Mills in AdS 4 and FAdS- maximization,” JHEP03(2026), 254 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2026)254 [arXiv:2506.05162 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep03(2026)254 2026

  32. [32]

    Dressing and Screening in Anti-de Sitter,

    Ankur, L. Di Pietro, V. Gorbenko, S. Komatsu and V. Sacchi, “Dressing and Screening in Anti-de Sitter,” [arXiv:2601.04321 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  33. [33]

    Stability in Gauged Extended Supergravity,

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Z. Freedman, “Stability in Gauged Extended Supergravity,” Annals Phys.144(1982), 249 doi:10.1016/0003-4916(82)90116-6

    doi:10.1016/0003-4916(82)90116-6 1982

  34. [34]

    Large N field the- ories, string theory and gravity,

    O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz, “Large N field the- ories, string theory and gravity,” Phys. Rept.323(2000), 183-386 doi:10.1016/S0370- 1573(99)00083-6 [arXiv:hep-th/9905111 [hep-th]]. 42

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370- 2000

  35. [35]

    AdS / CFT correspondence and symmetry breaking,

    I. R. Klebanov and E. Witten, “AdS / CFT correspondence and symmetry breaking,” Nucl. Phys. B556(1999), 89-114 doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00387-9 [arXiv:hep-th/9905104 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(99)00387-9 1999

  36. [36]

    A Neumann Boundary Term for Gravity,

    C. Krishnan and A. Raju, “A Neumann Boundary Term for Gravity,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 32(2017) no.14, 1750077 doi:10.1142/S0217732317500778 [arXiv:1605.01603 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0217732317500778 2017

  37. [37]

    A Dynamical Boundary for Anti-de Sitter Space

    C. Krishnan, A. Raju and P. N. Bala Subramanian, “Dynamical boundary for anti–de Sitter space,” Phys. Rev. D94(2016) no.12, 126011 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.126011 [arXiv:1609.06300 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.126011 2016

  38. [38]

    Partition Functions, the Bekenstein Bound and Temperature Inversion in Anti-de Sitter Space and its Conformal Boundary

    G. W. Gibbons, M. J. Perry and C. N. Pope, “Partition functions, the Bekenstein bound and temperature inversion in anti-de Sitter space and its conformal boundary,” Phys. Rev. D74(2006), 084009 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.084009 [arXiv:hep-th/0606186 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.084009 2006

  39. [39]

    One-loop Partition Functions of 3D Gravity,

    S. Giombi, A. Maloney and X. Yin, “One-loop Partition Functions of 3D Gravity,” JHEP 08(2008), 007 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/08/007 [arXiv:0804.1773 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/08/007 2008

  40. [40]

    Black hole determinants and quasinormal modes,

    F. Denef, S. A. Hartnoll and S. Sachdev, “Black hole determinants and quasinormal modes,” Class. Quant. Grav.27(2010), 125001 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/12/125001 [arXiv:0908.2657 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/12/125001 2010

  41. [41]

    The Heat Kernel on AdS(3) and its Applications,

    J. R. David, M. R. Gaberdiel and R. Gopakumar, “The Heat Kernel on AdS(3) and its Applications,” JHEP04(2010), 125 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2010)125 [arXiv:0911.5085 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2010)125 2010

  42. [42]

    The Heat Kernel on $AdS$

    R. Gopakumar, R. K. Gupta and S. Lal, “The Heat Kernel onAdS,” JHEP11(2011), 010 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2011)010 [arXiv:1103.3627 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep11(2011)010 2011

  43. [43]

    Partition Functions for Higher-Spin theories in AdS,

    R. K. Gupta and S. Lal, “Partition Functions for Higher-Spin theories in AdS,” JHEP07 (2012), 071 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2012)071 [arXiv:1205.1130 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2012)071 2012

  44. [44]

    Partition Functions in Even Dimensional AdS via Quasinormal Mode Methods

    C. Keeler and G. S. Ng, “Partition Functions in Even Dimensional AdS via Quasinormal Mode Methods,” JHEP06(2014), 099 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2014)099 [arXiv:1401.7016 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2014)099 2014

  45. [45]

    Normal modes in thermal AdS via the Selberg zeta function

    V. L. Martin and A. Svesko, “Normal modes in thermal AdS via the Selberg zeta function,” SciPost Phys.9(2020), 009 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.9.1.009 [arXiv:1910.11913 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.21468/scipostphys.9.1.009 2020

  46. [46]

    Anomalous dimensions from ther- mal AdS partition functions,

    P. Kraus, S. Megas and A. Sivaramakrishnan, “Anomalous dimensions from ther- mal AdS partition functions,” JHEP10(2020), 149 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2020)149 [arXiv:2004.08635 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2020)149 2020

  47. [47]

    On partition functions and phases of scalars in AdS

    A. Kakkar and S. Sarkar, “On partition functions and phases of scalars in AdS,” JHEP07 (2022), 089 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)089 [arXiv:2201.09043 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2022)089 2022

  48. [48]

    Phases of theories with fermions in AdS

    A. Kakkar and S. Sarkar, “Phases of theories with fermions in AdS,” JHEP06(2023), 009 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2023)009 [arXiv:2303.02711 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2023)009 2023

  49. [49]

    Partition functions for $U(1)$ vectors and phases of scalar QED in AdS

    A. Kakkar and S. Sarkar, “Partition functions for U(1) vectors and phases of scalar QED in AdS,” JHEP06(2024), 095 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2024)095 [arXiv:2311.06045 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2024)095 2024

  50. [50]

    One-Loop Analysis of Phases of Scalar Field Theories in Thermal Anti-de Sitter Spaces,

    A. Kakkar and S. Sarkar, “One-Loop Analysis of Phases of Scalar Field Theories in Thermal Anti-de Sitter Spaces,” Springer Proc. Phys.304(2024), 52-56 doi:10.1007/978-981-97- 0289-3 10 43

    doi:10.1007/978-981-97- 2024

  51. [51]

    Partition Functions and Phases of Quantum Field Theories in AdS Spaces,

    A. Kakkar and S. Sarkar, “Partition Functions and Phases of Quantum Field Theories in AdS Spaces,” Springer Proc. Phys.432(2026), 499-502 doi:10.1007/978-981-95-1513- 4 114

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-95-1513- 2026

  52. [52]

    Absence of ferromagnetism or antiferromagnetism in one- dimensional or two-dimensional isotropic Heisenberg models,

    N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, “Absence of ferromagnetism or antiferromagnetism in one- dimensional or two-dimensional isotropic Heisenberg models,” Phys. Rev. Lett.17(1966), 1133-1136 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.17.1133

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.17.1133 1966

  53. [53]

    There are no Goldstone bosons in two-dimensions,

    S. R. Coleman, “There are no Goldstone bosons in two-dimensions,” Commun. Math. Phys. 31(1973), 259-264 doi:10.1007/BF01646487

    doi:10.1007/bf01646487 1973

  54. [54]

    Multitrace operators, boundary conditions, and AdS / CFT correspondence,

    E. Witten, “Multitrace operators, boundary conditions, and AdS / CFT correspondence,” [arXiv:hep-th/0112258 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [55]

    ’Double trace’ deformations, boundary conditions and space-time singularities,

    M. Berkooz, A. Sever and A. Shomer, “’Double trace’ deformations, boundary conditions and space-time singularities,” JHEP05(2002), 034 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/05/034 [arXiv:hep-th/0112264 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/05/034 2002

  56. [56]

    Table of Integrals, Series, and Products

    I.S. Gradshteyn and I.M. Ryzhik, “Table of Integrals, Series, and Products”. 44