Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Massive-Scalar Effective Actions on Anti-de Sitter Spacetime

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 19 Aug 1998

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We use these to argue against the quantum validity of a recently-proposed duality relating such theories with differing masses and cosmological constants.

how it is stated · asserted 0.73 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-th/9808107 (version 1)
Pith IDQPUPME2I, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationC.P. Burgess, M. Kamela. "Massive-Scalar Effective Actions on Anti-de Sitter Spacetime." arXiv:hep-th/9808107 (1998). https://pith.science/paper/QPUPME2I
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,895 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.17 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.09 · compares with prior results 0.30 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Closed forms are derived for the effective actions for free, massive spinless fields in anti-de Sitter spacetimes in arbitrary dimensions. The results have simple expressions in terms of elementary functions (for odd dimensions) or multiple Gamma functions (for even dimensions). We use these to argue against the quantum validity of a recently-proposed duality relating such theories with differing masses and cosmological constants.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Closed forms are derived for the effective actions for free, massive spinless fields in anti-de Sitter spacetimes in arbitrary dimensions. result 0.65 0.94 0.17 asserted 1.00
s1 The results have simple expressions in terms of elementary functions (for odd dimensions) or multiple Gamma functions (for even dimensions). result 0.99 0.89 0.09 asserted 1.00
s2 We use these to argue against the quantum validity of a recently-proposed duality relating such theories with differing masses and cosmological constants. interpretation 0.98 0.80 0.76 asserted 0.73

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Closed forms are derived for the effective actions for free, massive spinless fields in anti-de Sitter spacetimes in arbitrary dimensions. The results have simple expressions in terms of elementary functions (for odd dimensions) or multiple Gamma functions (for even dimensions). We use these to argue against the quantum validity of a recently-proposed duality relating such theories with differing masses and cosmological constants.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

4 arXiv papers cite this in 13 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 9 sentences without a confident label

Compares with it 1 paper
  • From these definitions, we find that W(μ) = -1/2 logΓ_d( μ+ d-1/2 ) - 1/2 logΓ_d ( μ+ d+1/2 ) + c , providing another route to the results [ref] obtained by direct evaluation of ([ref]).

    On Marginal Operators in Boundary Conformal Field Theory · The Partition Function on the Hemisphere · 0.90

Cites it as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.