Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 50 references

A particle near a wormhole throat stays partly regular even at extreme energy, unlike the total chaos near a black-hole horizon.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-11 13:20 UTC pith:GYKN5TYZ

load-bearing objection Clean 1-D stability contrast and 2-D KAM survival for wormholes under harmonic trap; the BH distinction is only half-controlled and the observational leap is premature. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.04799 v1 pith:GYKN5TYZ submitted 2026-07-06 gr-qc

Chaotic particle dynamics near a traversable wormhole throat

Xin Zhao , Xing-Kun Zhang , Ya-Peng Hu , Yu-Sen An This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords traversable wormholeparticle motionchaotic dynamicsKAM toriPoincaré sectionLyapunov exponentblack-hole mimickersMorris-Thorne metric
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that a test particle held near a traversable wormhole throat by a harmonic potential is linearly stable in the radial direction, yet develops large-scale chaos once motion is allowed in two dimensions at high energy. Even so, when the particle is kept on one side of the throat, islands of regular Kolmogorov–Arnold–Moser (KAM) tori survive in the Poincaré section right up to the energy barrier that would let it cross. That surviving regularity is absent for the same potential near a black-hole event horizon, whose surface gravity drives fully chaotic motion. The pattern is confirmed for two different wormhole shape functions, so it is not an artefact of one metric. If the distinction holds under more realistic forces, chaotic signatures in strong-field data could help tell wormholes from black holes.

Core claim

When a massive test particle is confined by an external harmonic potential to one side of an ultrastatic traversable wormhole, its two-dimensional phase space develops extensive chaos at high energy yet still retains unbroken KAM tori around the equilibrium radius; the same setup near a Schwarzschild horizon produces fully chaotic Poincaré sections. The residual regularity is traced to the linear radial stability that follows from the wormhole flare-out condition, a feature the horizon lacks.

What carries the argument

The one-dimensional radial Lyapunov exponent λ² derived from the effective potential near the throat (Eq. 7–10), which is strictly negative for confining potentials and vanishes as the equilibrium approaches the throat; this local stability seeds the persistent KAM tori that survive high-energy two-dimensional chaos in the Poincaré sections.

Load-bearing premise

The particle is held on one side of the throat solely by an artificial isotropic harmonic potential whose strength and energy cut-off are chosen by hand, and that this setup is representative of real astrophysical forces.

What would settle it

Compute Poincaré sections for the same wormhole metrics but replace the harmonic potential with a realistic astrophysical force (for example, a magnetic dipole or accretion-disk pressure gradient); if the high-energy KAM islands disappear, the claimed distinction from black-hole chaos fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Poincaré sections or maximum Lyapunov exponents extracted from extreme-mass-ratio orbits could serve as a dynamical discriminator between wormholes and black holes.
  • The saturation value of the maximum Lyapunov exponent near the throat is independent of the two shape functions examined, suggesting an intrinsic upper bound set by the throat geometry.
  • Lightlike geodesics (photons) under analogous confinement would produce distinctive chaotic features in wormhole shadows or lensing caustics.
  • Asymmetric wormholes are predicted to retain the same qualitative coexistence of chaos and KAM tori provided the particle remains on one side.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the residual KAM islands survive under more realistic forces, gravitational-wave templates for extreme-mass-ratio inspirals around compact objects could be modified to search for partial regularity rather than pure chaos.
  • The same radial-stability argument may apply to other horizonless ultracompact objects (boson stars, gravastars) whose metrics also violate g_tt = 1/g_rr near their surfaces.
  • A direct numerical comparison of the saturated Lyapunov exponent for the wormhole versus the surface gravity of the equivalent-mass black hole would quantify how much “less chaotic” the wormhole really is.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the nonlinear dynamics of a massive test particle near the throat of an ultrastatic Morris–Thorne wormhole subject to an external isotropic harmonic potential. A one-dimensional radial linear-stability analysis yields λ² < 0 near equilibrium (Eqs. 7–10), in contrast to the surface-gravity result λ = κ for Schwarzschild. The two-dimensional Hamiltonian (Eqs. 14–18) is integrated with RK4; Poincaré sections and maximum Lyapunov exponents are computed for two shape functions (b(r) = r₀²/r and b(r) = r e^{-(r-r₀)}) at energies up to just below the one-sided barrier E_c = 101. The sections show a progressive transition from nested KAM tori to large-scale chaos while a core of unbroken KAM tori persists near the equilibrium radius. The authors interpret this residual regularity as a geometric signature of the throat that distinguishes wormholes from black-hole horizons and propose it as an observational criterion for black-hole mimickers.

Significance. If the claimed distinction survives a controlled comparison, the work supplies a concrete, phase-space-based diagnostic that could complement existing echo, shadow and tidal-deformability tests of horizonless compact objects. The analytic radial-stability expansion is clean and correctly recovers the known black-hole limit; the numerical survey is systematic across two shape functions and a wide energy range; and the persistence of KAM islands at high energy is a falsifiable prediction. These features make the manuscript a useful contribution to the growing literature that uses single-particle chaos as a probe of strong-field geometry.

major comments (2)
  1. The central observational claim—that residual KAM tori at E o E_c are “distinct from the chaos caused by the event horizon”—rests on an unmatched comparison. Sections 4–5 and Figs. 1, 3 present only wormhole data; the black-hole references [4,5] employed different potentials, energy normalizations and no hard one-sided barrier. Without a side-by-side Schwarzschild integration that uses the identical isotropic harmonic potential (Eq. 19), the same parameters (r_e = 2, ω_r = ω_θ = 10√2, m = 1) and a comparable energy sequence, it remains possible that the surviving central islands are an artifact of the confining potential rather than a geometric signature of the flare-out condition. A matched control is load-bearing for the claimed criterion.
  2. The entire analysis is performed under the artificial constraint E < E_c = 101 that forbids throat traversal (Sec. 4, paragraph after Eq. 20). The abstract and conclusion present the residual KAM structure as a general feature of traversable wormholes. The manuscript should either (i) demonstrate that the same phase-space structure survives when particles are allowed to cross the throat, or (ii) explicitly restrict the observational claim to one-sided, externally confined motion and discuss how realistic astrophysical forces would enforce such a cut-off.
minor comments (4)
  1. Notation for the Lyapunov exponent is overloaded: λ appears both as the radial eigenvalue (Eq. 7) and as the maximum Lyapunov exponent λ_m (Eq. 21). Distinct symbols would avoid confusion.
  2. Figure captions state that “points of the same color represent the same initial value,” yet the accompanying footnote notes that colors are not shared across panels. A single clarifying sentence in each caption would remove the ambiguity.
  3. The critical energy E_c = 101 is quoted without an explicit intermediate calculation; a short derivation from the Hamiltonian at r = r_0, p_r = p_θ = 0 would aid reproducibility.
  4. Several references (e.g., [16–18], [19,20]) are cited as arXiv preprints dated 2025; if they have since been published, the journal versions should be updated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: analytic stability and numerical Poincaré/Lyapunov results follow directly from the metric-plus-potential Hamiltonian without fitted targets or load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. One-dimensional radial stability (Eqs. 7–10) is obtained by expanding the effective potential of the Morris–Thorne metric under an external harmonic V; the sign of λ² is fixed by the flare-out condition b′(r0)<1 together with V″>0 and is not defined in terms of the later KAM claim. The two-dimensional Hamiltonian (Eq. 14) and its canonical equations (15–18) are written from the same metric plus the isotropic harmonic potential (Eq. 19); parameters (r0=1, re=2, ωr=ωθ=10√2) are chosen once and Ec=101 is computed from the Hamiltonian itself, not fitted to any observed chaos measure. Poincaré sections (Figs. 1, 3) and maximum Lyapunov exponents (Figs. 2, 4) are obtained by direct RK4 integration of those equations; the survival of central KAM tori is an output of the numerics, not an input. The black-hole contrast is drawn by citation to independent literature (Hashimoto–Tanahashi 2017, Dalui et al. 2019) whose authors do not overlap with the present paper; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors’ own prior work. Universality is checked by repeating the identical numerical pipeline on a second shape function. Nothing reduces by construction to a free parameter or to a self-citation that itself encodes the claimed result. The methodological gap that the Schwarzschild case is not re-run under identical V and energy cut is a controlled-comparison issue, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Morris-Thorne metric with Φ=0, the flare-out condition, an external harmonic potential chosen by hand, and the restriction that the particle never crosses the throat. No new physical entities are introduced; free parameters are the usual numerical choices that set the scale of the plots.

free parameters (3)
  • ω_r = ω_θ = 10√2
    Binding frequencies of the external harmonic potential; chosen by hand to confine the particle near re=2 and to set the critical energy Ec=101.
  • re = 2, r0 = 1
    Equilibrium radius and throat radius fixed by hand for all numerical runs.
  • energy list E = 5,9,10,15,50,100.9
    Discrete energies selected to illustrate the transition; the highest value is deliberately just below Ec.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Ultrastatic Morris-Thorne metric with Φ(r)=0 and shape function satisfying b(r0)=r0 and b'(r0)<1
    Used throughout Secs. 2–5; the linear-stability sign of λ² follows directly from this choice.
  • ad hoc to paper External isotropic harmonic potential V = (1/2)mωr²(r-re)² + (1/2)mωθ²θ²
    Introduced in Eq. (19) solely to confine the particle; the entire high-energy analysis and the observational claim rest on this force.
  • ad hoc to paper Particle energy kept below the critical barrier Ec so that it never traverses the throat
    Stated after Eq. (20); the surviving KAM tori are reported only under this restriction.
  • domain assumption Classical test-particle Hamiltonian dynamics in a fixed background (no back-reaction, no quantum effects)
    Standard GR assumption underlying the entire calculation.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 17788 in / 2772 out tokens · 28127 ms · 2026-07-11T13:20:53.617458+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

This study investigates the nonlinear dynamics of a test particle near the traversable wormhole throat under an external harmonic potential. One-dimensional radial perturbation analysis shows that the particle is locally linearly stable at the equilibrium position. However, for two-dimensional and high-energy cases, the system exhibits a nonlinear response, leading to large-scale chaos. The analysis indicates that, if the particle is confined on one side of the wormhole, the Poincare section will still retain Kolmogorov-Arnold-Moser (KAM) tori under extremely high-energy conditions, which is distinct from the chaos caused by the event horizon in the black hole. By studying another set of shape functions, the universality of this phase space structure is confirmed. This research clarifies the unique nonlinear dynamical mechanism of a traversable wormhole. It provides a new criterion, based on chaotic dynamics, for identifying black hole mimickers in strong-field astrophysical observations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.04799 by Xing-Kun Zhang, Xin Zhao, Ya-Peng Hu, Yu-Sen An.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Poincaré sections of a massive particle for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: When E =5, 9, 10, 15, 50, 100.9, the log-log graph shows the evolu￾tion of the maximum Lyapunov exponent in the corresponding Poincaré section (Fig.1) over time, t ∈ [0, 104 ]. When t = 104 , λm =[0.001, 0.004, 0.021, 0.043, 0.047, 0.050], corresponding to E =5, 9, 10, 15, 50, 100.9 from left to right. In Fig.2, we present a log-log plot of the evolution of λm over time at different energies (E =5, 9, 10, … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Poincaré sections of a massive particle for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: When E =5, 9, 10, 15, 50, 100.9, the log-log graph shows the evolu￾tion of the maximum Lyapunov exponent in the corresponding Poincaré section (Fig.3) over time, t ∈ [0, 104 ]. When t = 104 , λm =[0.001, 0.001, 0.031, 0.035, 0.046, 0.052], corresponding to E =5, 9, 10, 15, 50, 100.9 from left to right. saturation upper bound in the high-energy limit. This quanti￾tative coincidence suggests that the chaotic… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B. P. Abbott, et al., Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (6) (2016) 061102.arXiv:1602.03837,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.116.061102

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    Akiyama, et al., First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    K. Akiyama, et al., First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 (2019) L1.arXiv:1906.11238, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 2019

  3. [3]

    Akiyama, et al., First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    K. Akiyama, et al., First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way, Astrophys. J. Lett. 930 (2) (2022) L12.arXiv:2311.08680,doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6674

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6674 2022

  4. [4]

    Hashimoto, N

    K. Hashimoto, N. Tanahashi, Universality in Chaos of Particle Motion near Black Hole Horizon, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2) (2017) 024007.arXiv:1610.06070,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.95.024007

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    Dalui, B

    S. Dalui, B. R. Majhi, P. Mishra, Presence of hori- zon makes particle motion chaotic, Phys. Lett. B 788 (2019) 486–493.arXiv:1803.06527,doi:10.1016/ j.physletb.2018.11.050

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Maldacena, S

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford, A bound on chaos, JHEP 08 (2016) 106.arXiv:1503.01409,doi: 10.1007/JHEP08(2016)106

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep08(2016)106 2016

  7. [7]

    Zhao, Y .-Z

    Q.-Q. Zhao, Y .-Z. Li, H. Lu, Static Equilibria of Charged Particles Around Charged Black Holes: Chaos Bound and Its Violations, Phys. Rev. D 98 (12) (2018) 124001.arXiv:1809.04616,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.98.124001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Lei, X.-H

    Y .-Q. Lei, X.-H. Ge, C. Ran, Chaos of particle mo- tion near a black hole with quasitopological electromag- netism, Phys. Rev. D 104 (4) (2021) 046020.arXiv: 2008.01384,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.046020

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.046020 2021

  9. [9]

    Lei, X.-H

    Y .-Q. Lei, X.-H. Ge, Circular motion of charged parti- cles near a charged black hole, Phys. Rev. D 105 (8) (2022) 084011.arXiv:2111.06089,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.105.084011

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  10. [11]

    B. Gwak, N. Kan, B.-H. Lee, H. Lee, Violation of bound on chaos for charged probe in Kerr-Newman-AdS black hole, JHEP 09 (2022) 026.arXiv:2203.07298,doi: 10.1007/JHEP09(2022)026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep09(2022)026 2022

  11. [12]

    C. Yu, D. Chen, B. Mu, Y . He, Violating the chaos bound in five-dimensional, charged, rotating Einstein-Maxwell- Chern-Simons black holes, Nucl. Phys. B 987 (2023) 116093.doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2023.116093

    doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2023.116093 2023

  12. [13]

    Jeong, B.-H

    S. Jeong, B.-H. Lee, H. Lee, W. Lee, Homoclinic or- bit and the violation of the chaos bound around a black hole with anisotropic matter fields, Phys. Rev. D 107 (10) (2023) 104037.arXiv:2301.12198,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.107.104037. 7

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  13. [14]

    H. L. Prihadi, F. P. Zen, D. Dwiputra, S. Ariwahjoedi, Chaos and fast scrambling delays of a dyonic Kerr-Sen- AdS4 black hole and its ultraspinning version, Phys. Rev. D 107 (12) (2023) 124053.arXiv:2304.08751,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.124053

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.124053 2023

  14. [15]

    Chaos Bound and its violation in Black p-brane

    P. Dutta, K. L. Panigrahi, B. Singh, Chaos bound and its violation in black p-brane, JHEP 02 (2025) 043.arXiv: 2408.14056,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2025)043

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2025)043 2025

  15. [16]

    S. Das, S. Dalui, B.-H. Lee, Y .-F. Cai, Extreme- Mass-Ratio Inspirals Embedded in Dark Matter Halo I:Existence of Homoclinic Orbit and Near-Horizon Chaos (11 2025).arXiv:2511.03657

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [17]

    R. H. Ali, X.-M. Kuang, Probing thermodynamic phase transitions via Lyapunov exponent in AdS black hole with perfect fluid dark matter, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (10) (2025) 1131.doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14816-4

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14816-4 2025

  17. [18]

    S. Das, S. Dalui, B.-H. Lee, Y .-F. Cai, Extreme-Mass- Ratio Inspirals Embedded in Dark Matter Halo II: Chaotic Imprints in Gravitational Waves (12 2025).arXiv:2512. 04848

    2025

  18. [19]

    A. Bera, S. Dalui, S. Ghosh, E. C. Vagenas, Quantum cor- rections enhance chaos: Study of particle motion near a generalized Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Lett. B 829 (2022) 137033.arXiv:2109.00330,doi:10.1016/j. physletb.2022.137033

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j 2022

  19. [20]

    An, W.-H

    Y .-S. An, W.-H. Zhang, Probing quantum anomaly cor- rections on black hole physics through chaos (12 2025). arXiv:2512.19163

    arXiv 2025

  20. [21]

    M. S. Morris, K. S. Thorne, Wormholes in space-time and their use for interstellar travel: A tool for teach- ing general relativity, Am. J. Phys. 56 (1988) 395–412. doi:10.1119/1.15620

    doi:10.1119/1.15620 1988

  21. [22]

    P. O. Mazur, E. Mottola, Gravitational Condensate Stars: An Alternative to Black Holes, Universe 9 (2) (2023) 88.arXiv:gr-qc/0109035,doi:10.3390/ universe9020088

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  22. [23]

    F. E. Schunck, E. W. Mielke, General relativistic boson stars, Class. Quant. Grav. 20 (2003) R301–R356.arXiv: 0801.0307,doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/20/201

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/20/201 2003

  23. [24]

    S. L. Liebling, C. Palenzuela, Dynamical boson stars, Living Rev. Rel. 26 (1) (2023) 1.arXiv:1202.5809, doi:10.1007/s41114-023-00043-4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s41114-023-00043-4 2023

  24. [25]

    Raposo, P

    G. Raposo, P. Pani, M. Bezares, C. Palenzuela, V . Car- doso, Anisotropic stars as ultracompact objects in General Relativity, Phys. Rev. D 99 (10) (2019) 104072.arXiv: 1811.07917,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.104072

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.104072 2019

  25. [26]

    Cardoso, P

    V . Cardoso, P. Pani, Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report, Living Rev. Rel. 22 (1) (2019) 4.arXiv:1904.05363,doi:10.1007/ s41114-019-0020-4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  26. [28]

    Bambi, et al., Black hole mimickers: from theory to observation, 2025.arXiv:2505.09014

    C. Bambi, et al., Black hole mimickers: from theory to observation, 2025.arXiv:2505.09014

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  27. [29]

    Visser, Traversable wormholes: Some simple exam- ples, Phys

    M. Visser, Traversable wormholes: Some simple exam- ples, Phys. Rev. D 39 (1989) 3182–3184.arXiv:0809. 0907,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.39.3182

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.39.3182 1989

  28. [30]

    Visser, S

    M. Visser, S. Kar, N. Dadhich, Traversable wormholes with arbitrarily small energy condition violations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 201102.arXiv:gr-qc/0301003, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.201102

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.201102 2003

  29. [31]

    F. S. N. Lobo, Phantom energy traversable wormholes, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 084011.arXiv:gr-qc/ 0502099,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.084011

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.084011 2005

  30. [32]

    F. S. N. Lobo, M. A. Oliveira, Wormhole geometries in f(R) modified theories of gravity, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 104012.arXiv:0909.5539,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 80.104012

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd 2009

  31. [33]

    Kanti, B

    P. Kanti, B. Kleihaus, J. Kunz, Wormholes in Dila- tonic Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 271101.arXiv:1108.3003,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.107.271101

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  32. [34]

    J. L. Blázquez-Salcedo, C. Knoll, E. Radu, Traversable wormholes in Einstein-Dirac-Maxwell theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (10) (2021) 101102.arXiv:2010.07317,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.101102

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.101102 2021

  33. [35]

    R. A. Konoplya, A. Zhidenko, Traversable Worm- holes in General Relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (9) (2022) 091104.arXiv:2106.05034,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.128.091104

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  34. [36]

    Probing the connection between entangled particles and wormholes in general relativity

    B. Kain, Probing the Connection between Entangled Par- ticles and Wormholes in General Relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (10) (2023) 101001.arXiv:2309.03314,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.101001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.101001 2023

  35. [37]

    B. P. Abbott, et al., GW170817: Observation of Gravita- tional Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (16) (2017) 161101.arXiv:1710.05832, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.161101 2017

  36. [38]

    B. P. Abbott, et al., Properties of the binary neu- tron star merger GW170817, Phys. Rev. X 9 (1) (2019) 011001.arXiv:1805.11579,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevX.9.011001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  37. [39]

    B. P. Abbott, et al., GW190425: Observation of a Com- pact Binary Coalescence with Total Mass∼3.4M ⊙, As- trophys. J. Lett. 892 (1) (2020) L3.arXiv:2001.01761, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab75f5. 8

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab75f5 2020

  38. [40]

    Ajith, et al., The Lunar Gravitational-wave Antenna: mission studies and science case, JCAP 01 (2025) 108.arXiv:2404.09181,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/ 2025/01/108

    P. Ajith, et al., The Lunar Gravitational-wave Antenna: mission studies and science case, JCAP 01 (2025) 108.arXiv:2404.09181,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/ 2025/01/108

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/ 2025

  39. [41]

    S. A. Hayward, Wormhole dynamics in spherical symme- try, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 124001.arXiv:0903.5438, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.124001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.124001 2009

  40. [42]

    Martin-Moruno, P

    P. Martin-Moruno, P. F. Gonzalez-Diaz, Thermal radia- tion from Lorentzian traversable wormholes, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 024007.arXiv:0907.4055,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.80.024007

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  41. [43]

    H. G. Ellis, Ether flow through a drainhole - a particle model in general relativity, J. Math. Phys. 14 (1973) 104– 118.doi:10.1063/1.1666161

    doi:10.1063/1.1666161 1973

  42. [44]

    Muller, Exact geometric optics in a Morris-Thorne wormhole spacetime, Phys

    T. Muller, Exact geometric optics in a Morris-Thorne wormhole spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 044043. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.044043

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.044043 2008

  43. [45]

    Ohgami, N

    T. Ohgami, N. Sakai, Wormhole shadows, Phys. Rev. D 91 (12) (2015) 124020.arXiv:1704.07065,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.91.124020

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  44. [46]

    Tsukamoto, Strong deflection limit analysis and grav- itational lensing of an Ellis wormhole, Phys

    N. Tsukamoto, Strong deflection limit analysis and grav- itational lensing of an Ellis wormhole, Phys. Rev. D 94 (12) (2016) 124001.arXiv:1607.07022,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.94.124001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  45. [47]

    G. C. Samanta, N. Godani, K. Bamba, Traversable worm- holes with exponential shape function in modified gravity and general relativity: A comparative study, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 29 (09) (2020) 2050068.arXiv:1811.06834, doi:10.1142/S0218271820500686

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0218271820500686 2020

  46. [48]

    Traversable Wormholes in $R+\alpha R^n$ Gravity

    N. Godani, G. C. Samanta, Traversable Worm- holes inR+αR n Gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (1) (2020) 30.arXiv:2001.00010,doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7587-5

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7587-5 2020

  47. [49]

    Traversable wormholes in $f(R)$-massive gravity

    T. Tangphati, A. Chatrabhuti, D. Samart, P. Channuie, Traversable wormholes inf(R)-massive gravity, Phys. Rev. D 102 (8) (2020) 084026.arXiv:2003.01544, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.084026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.084026 2020

  48. [50]

    Dutta, D

    A. Dutta, D. Roy, S. Chakraborty, Particle motion around traversable wormholes: Possibility of closed timelike geodesics, New Astron. 111 (2024) 102236.arXiv: 2404.11984,doi:10.1016/j.newast.2024.102236

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.newast.2024.102236 2024

  49. [51]

    Echoes from Asymmetric Wormholes and Black Bounce

    M.-Y . Ou, M.-Y . Lai, H. Huang, Echoes from asymmet- ric wormholes and black bounce, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (5) (2022) 452.arXiv:2111.13890,doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-022-10421-x

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/ 2022

  50. [52]

    Huang, J

    H. Huang, J. Kunz, J. Yang, C. Zhang, Light ring behind wormhole throat: Geodesics, images, and shadows, Phys. Rev. D 107 (10) (2023) 104060.arXiv:2303.11885, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.104060. 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.104060 2023