Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 74 references

In the solvable SYK model, all moments of post-measurement states match the Scrooge ensemble exactly, even at arbitrarily short times, via saddle-point gluing of forward and backward branches.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-11 12:18 UTC pith:M5S2Z7UQ

load-bearing objection First analytic derivation that projected ensembles in large-N SYK match Scrooge moments at all times via explicit 2^k k! saddles; solid and useful for the deep-thermalization community.

arxiv 2607.04864 v1 pith:M5S2Z7UQ submitted 2026-07-06 quant-ph

Emergence of the Scrooge Ensemble in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Model

Zeyu Liu , Pengfei Zhang This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords Scrooge ensembledeep thermalizationprojected ensembleSachdev-Ye-Kitaev modelquantum measurementpath integralreplica saddlesMajorana fermions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

When only part of a many-body quantum system is measured, the leftover subsystem is left in a random post-measurement state. The collection of those states, weighted by their measurement probabilities, is called the projected ensemble. Deep thermalization asks whether this ensemble becomes as random as possible given the average density matrix—the Scrooge ensemble. This paper uses the exactly solvable Sachdev–Ye–Kitaev model to show that the match is exact: every moment of the projected ensemble coincides with the corresponding moment of the Scrooge ensemble, and the equality already holds at arbitrarily short evolution times. The mechanism is transparent in a path-integral formulation: the large measured subsystem forces the dominant saddle points to glue every forward-evolution branch to a backward-evolution branch in every possible way; those gluings are precisely the replica permutations that define Scrooge statistics. The result supplies an analytic window into how universal measurement statistics emerge from chaotic many-body dynamics.

Core claim

All moments of the projected ensemble of post-measurement states in the SYK model are identical to those of the Scrooge ensemble associated with the average reduced density matrix, even at arbitrarily short evolution times. The identity is generated by the complete set of 2^k k! saddle points of the replicated measurement path integral, which implement every possible pairing of forward and backward branches together with every relative sign.

What carries the argument

The replicated measurement path integral for the large measured subsystem B. Its saddle-point configurations glue each of the k forward-evolution branches to one of the k backward-evolution branches (k! pairings) and allow 2^k relative signs; the resulting operators on the unmeasured subsystem A are exactly the replica permutations that appear in the moments of the Scrooge ensemble.

Load-bearing premise

The unmeasured subsystem must stay parametrically small so that it does not back-react on the saddle-point equations of the measured bulk; otherwise the saddles themselves change and the exact match need not hold.

What would settle it

Compute higher moments of the projected ensemble for a finite but growing number of unmeasured modes NA and check whether the deviation from Scrooge moments vanishes only as NA/N o0; any finite-NA correction that survives at large N would falsify the claimed exact match.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies projective measurements of a large subsystem B of the SYK model prepared in a thermofield-double state and evolved for time t. Using the large-N G-Σ path integral, it obtains the disorder-averaged measurement probabilities p(λ) and the participation entropy, then computes all moments of the projected ensemble on the unmeasured subsystem A (NA = O(1)). The multi-replica saddles of the measurement path integral produce 2^k k! configurations whose sum yields ρ_A^{(n)} ∝ lim_{k o1} tr_{n+1}^k [ρ_A^{⊗k} ∑_{P∈S_k} P], which is exactly the moment hierarchy of the Scrooge ensemble associated with the average post-measurement density matrix. The match holds at arbitrarily short times. Supplementary Material derives the saddle-point equations, verifies that the first moment recovers the reduced density matrix of A, and treats the ensemble without parity post-selection.

Significance. Deep thermalization and the emergence of the Scrooge ensemble have so far been supported mainly by numerics or by special dual-unitary constructions. An analytic derivation in a paradigmatic chaotic Hamiltonian model, with an explicit saddle-point mechanism that generates the replica permutations, is a genuine advance. The result is parameter-free at leading large N once NA = O(1) is accepted, and the paper supplies both the full measurement-outcome distribution and a transparent physical picture (gluing of forward and backward branches by the large measured subsystem). These features make the work a useful reference for subsequent studies of measurement statistics in chaotic many-body systems.

minor comments (4)
  1. The post-selection on even fermion parity is introduced early and is essential for the projector P+ that appears in Eq. (11). A short clarifying sentence in the Setup section stating that the final Scrooge match is for the even-parity sector (with the odd-sector mixture deferred to the SM) would help readers who skip the SM.
  2. Fig. 3(a) and Fig. 4 show representative saddle solutions of G^{B+}. Adding a brief caption note that the two families are related by inter-branch sign flips (and that all 2^k k! combinations are included in the sum) would make the connection to Eq. (13) more immediate.
  3. The absolute-value factor |G^{B+}_{L0}| that appears in Eq. (6) is crucial for connectivity at short times; a one-sentence reminder of its origin (even number of Majorana insertions) would aid readers less familiar with the Pauli-spectrum literature cited in Ref. [68].
  4. Notation for the continuous distribution p(λ) versus the discrete pm is introduced cleanly, but the constant C0 that absorbs post-selection is left somewhat implicit; stating once that C0 is fixed by ∑_m pm = 1 would remove any residual ambiguity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: Scrooge moments emerge from explicit large-N saddles of the replicated measurement path integral, not by definition or fit.

full rationale

The central claim (all moments of the projected ensemble match those of the Scrooge ensemble even at short times) is obtained by writing measurement probabilities and unnormalized post-measurement states as SYK path integrals, deriving the saddle-point equations for the large measured subsystem B (Eq. (5) and SM), enumerating the 2^k k! saddles that pair forward/backward branches across replicas (Figs. 2(c), 4), and showing that their sum produces exactly the replica-permutation operators that appear in the Weingarten expansion of Scrooge moments (Eqs. (12)–(15)). The Weingarten calculus itself is standard external mathematics; the NA = O(1) back-reaction assumption is stated and controlled; no parameter is fitted to data and then re-predicted; and self-citations are only to prior SYK technical tools whose assumptions are restated in the SM. The derivation is therefore self-contained at leading order in 1/N and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The derivation rests on standard large-N SYK technology and the definition of the Scrooge ensemble; no new free parameters are fitted to data and no new physical entities are postulated. The only modeling choices are the usual thermodynamic limit, the O(1) size of the unmeasured subsystem, and post-selection on even fermion parity (relaxed in the SM).

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption In the N→∞ limit the SYK path integral is dominated by the saddle-point solutions of the G-Σ equations, and the partition function is self-averaging.
    Invoked throughout the Measurement probabilities and Deep thermalization sections to replace disorder averages by saddle-point evaluations (Eqs. (5)–(6) and multi-replica analogues).
  • domain assumption Subsystem A contains only O(1) Majorana pairs, so its back-reaction on the saddles of B is negligible and the self-energy felt by A equals that of B.
    Stated explicitly after Eq. (9) and used to obtain the Gaussian path integral for ρ_m,A.
  • standard math The moments of the Haar ensemble reduce via Weingarten calculus to a sum over permutations of the symmetric group.
    Used to identify the saddle-generated expression (14) with the known moments of the Scrooge ensemble (15).
  • domain assumption Post-selection on an even number of negative measurement outcomes projects onto the positive-parity subspace; the odd sector can be treated separately.
    Introduced in the Setup paragraph and relaxed in the SM; produces the projector P_+ that appears in ρ_A.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 39717 in / 2599 out tokens · 30866 ms · 2026-07-11T12:18:31.497649+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The probabilistic nature of quantum measurement provides a direct window into the structure and complexity of many-body wave functions. When only part of a system is measured, the remaining degrees of freedom form an ensemble of post-measurement states whose statistical structure can reveal a stronger form of thermalization, known as deep thermalization. Recent numerical evidence suggests that this phenomenon is characterized by convergence of the projected ensemble to the Scrooge ensemble, a maximally random ensemble compatible with a given density matrix. In this Letter, we use the solvable Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev (SYK) model to unveil the mechanism by which the Scrooge ensemble emerges in many-body systems. By formulating measurement probabilities and post-measurement states in terms of path integrals, we analytically characterize all moments of the projected ensemble and show that they exactly match those of the Scrooge ensemble, even at short evolution times. We further connect this result to the saddle-point structure of the measurement path integral, which naturally generates the replica permutations underlying Scrooge statistics. Our results establish the solvable SYK model as a tractable setting for exploring universal statistics of quantum measurements in chaotic many-body dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.04864 by Pengfei Zhang, Zeyu Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of the main setup. The sys [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Path-integral representation of the measure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Numerical results for the measurement probability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Saddle-point solutions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Numerical verification of the reduced density matrix from the projected ensemble. Here, we choose [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 36 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    J. M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2046 (1991)

    2046

  2. [2]

    Srednicki, Thermal fluctuations in quantized chaotic systems, J

    M. Srednicki, Thermal fluctuations in quantized chaotic systems, J. Phys. A 29, L75 (1996)

    1996

  3. [3]

    Susskind, Computational Complexity and Black Hole Horizons, Fortsch

    L. Susskind, Computational Complexity and Black Hole Horizons, Fortsch. Phys. 64, 24 (2016), [Addendum: Fortsch.Phys. 64, 44–48 (2016)], arXiv:1403.5695 [hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Stanford and L

    D. Stanford and L. Susskind, Complexity and Shock Wave Geometries, Phys. Rev. D 90, 126007 (2014), arXiv:1406.2678 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  5. [5]

    A. M. Dalzell, N. Hunter-Jones, and F. G. S. L. Brand˜ ao, Random Quantum Circuits Anticoncentrate in Log Depth, PRX Quantum 3, 010333 (2022), arXiv:2011.12277 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    Boixo, S

    S. Boixo, S. V. Isakov, V. N. Smelyanskiy, R. Bab- bush, N. Ding, Z. Jiang, M. J. Bremner, J. M. Marti- nis, and H. Neven, Characterizing quantum supremacy 6 in near-term devices, Nature Phys. 14, 595 (2018), arXiv:1608.00263 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    Fefferman, S

    B. Fefferman, S. Ghosh, and W. Zhan, Anti- Concentration for the Unitary Haar Measure and Appli- cations to Random Quantum Circuits, Leibniz Int. Proc. Inf. 362, 57:1 (2026), arXiv:2407.19561 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2026

  8. [8]

    Hangleiter and J

    D. Hangleiter and J. Eisert, Computational advantage of quantum random sampling, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 035001 (2023)

    2023

  9. [9]

    Turkeshi and P

    X. Turkeshi and P. Sierant, Hilbert Space Delocalization under Random Unitary Circuits, Entropy 26, 471 (2024), arXiv:2404.10725 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    P. W. Claeys and G. De Tomasi, Fock-space delocaliza- tion and the emergence of the porter-thomas distribu- tion from dual-unitary dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 050405 (2025)

    2025

  11. [11]

    G. Lami, J. De Nardis, and X. Turkeshi, Anticoncentra- tion and state design of random tensor networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 010401 (2025)

    2025

  12. [12]

    Magni, A

    B. Magni, A. Christopoulos, A. De Luca, and X. Turkeshi, Anticoncentration in Clifford Circuits and Beyond: From Random Tensor Networks to Pseu- domagic States, Phys. Rev. X 15, 031071 (2025), arXiv:2502.20455 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Christopoulos, A

    A. Christopoulos, A. Chan, and A. De Luca, Univer- sal distributions of overlaps from generic dynamics in quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 043035 (2025), arXiv:2404.10057 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Magni, M

    B. Magni, M. Heinrich, L. Leone, and X. Turkeshi, An- ticoncentration and state design of doped real Clifford circuits and tensor networks, Phys. Rev. A 113, 062446 (2026), arXiv:2512.15880 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  15. [15]

    Tirrito, X

    E. Tirrito, X. Turkeshi, and P. Sierant, Anticoncentration and Nonstabilizerness Spreading under Ergodic Quan- tum Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 220401 (2025), arXiv:2412.10229 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Sauliere, G

    A. Sauliere, G. Lami, C. Boyer, J. De Nardis, and A. De Luca, Universality in the Anticoncentration of Noisy Quantum Circuits at Finite Depths, PRX Quan- tum 7, 020365 (2026), arXiv:2508.14975 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2026

  17. [17]

    Sauliere, B

    A. Sauliere, B. Magni, G. Lami, X. Turkeshi, and J. De Nardis, Universality in the anticoncentration of chaotic quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B 112, 134312 (2025), arXiv:2503.00119 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    D. J. Luitz, F. Alet, and N. Laflorencie, Universal behav- ior beyond multifractality in quantum many-body sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 057203 (2014)

    2014

  19. [19]

    Mac´ e, F

    N. Mac´ e, F. Alet, and N. Laflorencie, Multifractal scal- ings across the many-body localization transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 180601 (2019)

    2019

  20. [20]

    Sierant and X

    P. Sierant and X. Turkeshi, Universal behavior be- yond multifractality of wave functions at measurement- induced phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 130605 (2022)

    2022

  21. [21]

    Aaronson and A

    S. Aaronson and A. Arkhipov, The computational com- plexity of linear optics, in Proceedings of the forty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing (2011) pp. 333–342

    2011

  22. [22]

    M. J. Bremner, A. Montanaro, and D. J. Shepherd, Average-case complexity versus approximate simulation of commuting quantum computations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 080501 (2016)

    2016

  23. [23]

    Bouland, B

    A. Bouland, B. Fefferman, C. Nirkhe, and U. Vazi- rani, On the complexity and verification of quantum random circuit sampling, Nature Phys. 15, 159 (2018), arXiv:1803.04402 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  24. [24]

    Oszmaniec, N

    M. Oszmaniec, N. Dangniam, M. E. Morales, and Z. Zim- bor´ as, Fermion sampling: A robust quantum computa- tional advantage scheme using fermionic linear optics and magic input states, PRX Quantum 3, 020328 (2022)

    2022

  25. [25]

    Choi et al

    J. Choi et al. , Preparing random states and benchmark- ing with many-body quantum chaos, Nature 613, 468 (2023), arXiv:2103.03535 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    P. W. Claeys and A. Lamacraft, Emergent quantum state designs and biunitarity in dual-unitary circuit dynamics, Quantum 6, 738 (2022)

    2022

  27. [27]

    Ippoliti and W

    M. Ippoliti and W. W. Ho, Solvable model of deep ther- malization with distinct design times, Quantum 6, 886 (2022)

    2022

  28. [28]

    W. W. Ho and S. Choi, Exact emergent quantum state designs from quantum chaotic dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 060601 (2022)

    2022

  29. [29]

    J. Choi, A. L. Shaw, I. S. Madjarov, X. Xie, R. Finkel- stein, J. P. Covey, J. S. Cotler, D. K. Mark, H.-Y. Huang, A. Kale, H. Pichler, F. G. S. L. Brand˜ ao, S. Choi, and M. Endres, Preparing random states and benchmarking with many-body quantum chaos, Nature613, 468 (2023)

    2023

  30. [30]

    J. S. Cotler, D. K. Mark, H.-Y. Huang, F. Hern´ andez, J. Choi, A. L. Shaw, M. Endres, and S. Choi, Emergent quantum state designs from individual many-body wave functions, PRX Quantum 4, 010311 (2023)

    2023

  31. [31]

    Ippoliti and W

    M. Ippoliti and W. W. Ho, Dynamical purification and the emergence of quantum state designs from the pro- jected ensemble, PRX Quantum 4, 030322 (2023)

    2023

  32. [32]

    C. Liu, Q. C. Huang, and W. W. Ho, Deep thermalization in gaussian continuous-variable quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 260401 (2024)

    2024

  33. [33]

    D. K. Mark, F. Surace, A. Elben, A. L. Shaw, J. Choi, G. Refael, M. Endres, and S. Choi, Maximum entropy principle in deep thermalization and in hilbert-space er- godicity, Phys. Rev. X 14, 041051 (2024)

    2024

  34. [34]

    Chang, H

    R.-A. Chang, H. Shrotriya, W. W. Ho, and M. Ippoliti, Deep thermalization under charge-conserving quantum dynamics, PRX Quantum 6, 020343 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    McGinley and T

    M. McGinley and T. Schuster, The scrooge ensemble in many-body quantum systems (2025), arXiv:2511.17172 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    X. Feng, C. Liu, Z. Cheng, W. W. Ho, and M. Ippoliti, Quantum resource localizability transitions in deep ther- malization (2026), arXiv:2606.08756 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    C. Liu, M. Ippoliti, and W. W. Ho, Coherence-induced deep thermalization transition in random permutation quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 100404 (2026)

    2026

  38. [38]

    W.-K. Mok, T. Haug, W. W. Ho, and J. Preskill, Nature is stingy: Universality of scrooge ensembles in quantum many-body systems (2026), arXiv:2601.00266 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2026

  39. [39]

    Jozsa, D

    R. Jozsa, D. Robb, and W. K. Wootters, Lower bound for accessible information in quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. A 49, 668 (1994)

    1994

  40. [40]

    Goldstein, J

    S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, R. Tumulka, and N. Zanghi, On the Distribution of the Wave Function for Systems in Thermal Equilibrium, J. Statist. Phys. 125, 1193 (2006), arXiv:quant-ph/0309021

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  41. [41]

    P. Reimann, Typicality of Pure States Randomly Sam- pled According to the Gaussian Adjusted Projected Mea- sure, Journal of Statistical Physics 132, 921 (2008), arXiv:0805.3102 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  42. [42]

    Goldstein, J

    S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, C. Mastrodonato, R. Tu- 7 mulka, and N. Zanghi, Universal Probability Distribution for the Wave Function of a Quantum System Entangled with Its Environment, Commun. Math. Phys. 342, 965 (2016), arXiv:1104.5482 [math-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  43. [43]

    Sachdev and J

    S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Gapless spin fluid ground state in a random, quantum Heisenberg magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993), arXiv:cond-mat/9212030

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  44. [44]

    Kitaev, talk given at fundamental physics prize sym- posium (2014)

    A. Kitaev, talk given at fundamental physics prize sym- posium (2014)

    2014

  45. [46]

    Chowdhury, A

    D. Chowdhury, A. Georges, O. Parcollet, and S. Sachdev, Sachdev-ye-kitaev models and beyond: Window into non-fermi liquids, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 035004 (2022)

    2022

  46. [47]

    Israel, Thermo field dynamics of black holes, Phys

    W. Israel, Thermo field dynamics of black holes, Phys. Lett. A 57, 107 (1976)

    1976

  47. [48]

    J. M. Maldacena, Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter, JHEP 04, 021, arXiv:hep-th/0106112

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [49]

    S.-K. Jian, C. Liu, X. Chen, B. Swingle, and P. Zhang, Measurement-Induced Phase Transition in the Monitored Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 140601 (2021), arXiv:2104.08270 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  49. [50]

    Antonini, B

    S. Antonini, B. Grado-White, S.-K. Jian, and B. Swingle, Holographic measurement and quantum teleportation in the SYK thermofield double, JHEP 02, 095, arXiv:2211.07658 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [51]

    Z. Liu, L. Chen, Y. Zhang, S. Zhou, and P. Zhang, Di- agnosing strong-to-weak symmetry breaking via Wight- man correlators, Commun. Phys. 8, 274 (2025), arXiv:2410.09327 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  51. [52]

    Weinstein, Efficient Detection of Strong-To-Weak Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking via the R´ enyi-1 Correlator, Phys

    Z. Weinstein, Efficient Detection of Strong-To-Weak Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking via the R´ enyi-1 Correlator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 150405 (2025), arXiv:2410.23512 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  52. [53]

    P. Gao, D. L. Jafferis, and A. C. Wall, Traversable Worm- holes via a Double Trace Deformation, JHEP 12, 151, arXiv:1608.05687 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [54]

    Maldacena, D

    J. Maldacena, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, Diving into traversable wormholes, Fortsch. Phys. 65, 1700034 (2017), arXiv:1704.05333 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  54. [55]

    Susskind and Y

    L. Susskind and Y. Zhao, Teleportation through the wormhole, Phys. Rev. D 98, 046016 (2018), arXiv:1707.04354 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  55. [56]

    Gao and H

    P. Gao and H. Liu, Regenesis and quantum traversable wormholes, JHEP 10, 048, arXiv:1810.01444 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  56. [57]

    A. R. Brown, H. Gharibyan, S. Leichenauer, H. W. Lin, S. Nezami, G. Salton, L. Susskind, B. Swingle, and M. Walter, Quantum Gravity in the Lab. I. Teleporta- tion by Size and Traversable Wormholes, PRX Quantum 4, 010320 (2023), arXiv:1911.06314 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  57. [58]

    Gao and D

    P. Gao and D. L. Jafferis, A traversable wormhole tele- portation protocol in the SYK model, JHEP 07, 097, arXiv:1911.07416 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1911

  58. [59]

    Schuster, B

    T. Schuster, B. Kobrin, P. Gao, I. Cong, E. T. Khabi- boulline, N. M. Linke, M. D. Lukin, C. Monroe, B. Yoshida, and N. Y. Yao, Many-Body Quantum Tele- portation via Operator Spreading in the Traversable Wormhole Protocol, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031013 (2022), arXiv:2102.00010 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  59. [60]

    Jafferis, A

    D. Jafferis, A. Zlokapa, J. D. Lykken, D. K. Kolch- meyer, S. I. Davis, N. Lauk, H. Neven, and M. Spiropulu, Traversable wormhole dynamics on a quantum proces- sor, Nature 612, 51 (2022), [Erratum: Nature 640, E32 (2025)]

    2022

  60. [61]

    S. Zhou, P. Zhang, and Z. Yu, Environment-induced Transitions in Many-body Quantum Teleportation, (2024), arXiv:2406.02277 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  61. [62]

    Liu and P

    Z. Liu and P. Zhang, Fidelity of wormhole teleportation in finite-qubit systems, JHEP 07, 031, arXiv:2403.16793 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [63]

    Burrage, C

    C. Burrage, C. K¨ ading, P. Millington, and J. Min´ aˇ r, Open quantum dynamics induced by light scalar fields, Phys. Rev. D 100, 076003 (2019), arXiv:1812.08760 [hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  63. [64]

    K¨ ading and M

    C. K¨ ading and M. Pitschmann, New method for directly computing reduced density matrices, Phys. Rev. D 107, 016005 (2023), arXiv:2204.08829 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  64. [65]

    This effectively renormalizes the probabilities by an order-one constant, which we keep implicit

  65. [66]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum computation and quantum information (Cambridge university press, 2010)

    2010

  66. [67]

    Y. Wu, Y. Tong, L. Mao, and P. Zhang, Exact Hilbert- space ergodicity from continuous monitoring, (2026), arXiv:2606.29042 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  67. [68]

    Bettaque and B

    V. Bettaque and B. Swingle, Magic and Wormholes in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Model, (2026), arXiv:2602.12339 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  68. [69]

    Kitaev and S

    A. Kitaev and S. J. Suh, The soft mode in the Sachdev- Ye-Kitaev model and its gravity dual, JHEP 05, 183, arXiv:1711.08467 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  69. [70]

    See the Supplementary Material for (1) a derivation of the saddle-point equations; (2) an explicit verification of the reduced density matrix obtained from the projected ensemble; and (3) a discussion of the projected ensemble without postselection

  70. [71]

    We have confirmed that moderate changes of this fraction do not lead to any appreciable change in the results

    In the numerics, we leave a small fraction NA/N = 10−2 of Majorana modes unmeasured to improve the conver- gence of the numerical solution near λ = 1. We have confirmed that moderate changes of this fraction do not lead to any appreciable change in the results

  71. [72]

    Chen, X.-L

    Y. Chen, X.-L. Qi, and P. Zhang, Replica wormhole and information retrieval in the SYK model coupled to Ma- jorana chains, JHEP 06, 121, arXiv:2003.13147 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  72. [73]

    Zhang, C

    P. Zhang, C. Liu, and X. Chen, Subsystem R´ enyi Entropy of Thermal Ensembles for SYK-like models, SciPost Phys. 8, 094 (2020), arXiv:2003.09766 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  73. [74]

    Iev46a7tM9HbPIAynAdRsMH0jdc=

    For an odd number of −1 entries in the measurement outcome, the Majorana insertions in the B− subsystem give a negative relative sign between the two saddle-point solutions, yielding Z m ∝ 2G B+ L0 NB− . This results in the factor (1 − U) ∝ P−. Supplementary Material: Emergence of the Scrooge Ensemble in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Model Zeyu Liu 1, 2 and Pengf...

    2026

  74. [75]

    Maldacena and D

    J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. D94, 106002 (2016), arXiv:1604.07818 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016