Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 minor 1 cited by

Continuous monitoring produces the Scrooge ensemble of any target density matrix as the unique late-time equilibrium of quantum trajectories.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-07-01 06:19 UTC pith:ZF5IMOLC

load-bearing objection The paper constructs monitoring with deformed unitary 1-design jump operators that forces the Scrooge ensemble of any target σ to be the unique trajectory equilibrium.

arxiv 2606.29042 v2 pith:ZF5IMOLC submitted 2026-06-27 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mech

Exact Hilbert-space ergodicity from continuous monitoring

Yue Wu , Yuzhi Tong , Liang Mao , Pengfei Zhang This is my paper
classification quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mech
keywords continuous monitoringquantum trajectoriesHilbert-space ergodicityScrooge ensembledeformed unitary 1-designquantum many-body systemsthermal equilibrium
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs continuously monitored quantum many-body systems in which the long-time distribution of pure-state trajectories is exactly the Scrooge ensemble tied to any chosen density matrix sigma. The proof holds when the monitoring jump operators satisfy only the condition of forming a deformed unitary 1-design. This condition is weaker than requiring the dynamics to be fully ergodic or Haar-random. Numerical simulations confirm the result for cases in which the target equilibrium states are thermal. The construction therefore supplies a concrete mechanism that turns monitoring into a generator of exact Hilbert-space ergodicity.

Core claim

For any target density matrix σ, we construct a continuously monitored system for which we rigorously prove that the Scrooge ensemble of σ is the unique late-time equilibrium distribution of quantum trajectories. Remarkably, this requires only that the jump operators in the monitoring form a deformed unitary 1-design, a seemingly much weaker condition than full ergodicity. We numerically demonstrate our predictions by simulating continuously monitored systems whose equilibrium states are thermal states.

What carries the argument

The deformed unitary 1-design condition on the jump operators, which forces the stochastic evolution under continuous monitoring to converge to the Scrooge ensemble of the target state.

Load-bearing premise

The jump operators used for monitoring must form a deformed unitary 1-design.

What would settle it

A numerical or experimental run in which the jump operators violate the deformed unitary 1-design condition yet the trajectory distribution still converges to the Scrooge ensemble of the target state.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Any chosen density matrix can be realized as the generator of an exact equilibrium ensemble of trajectories.
  • Thermal states arise as equilibrium distributions under suitable choices of monitoring operators.
  • Hilbert-space ergodicity becomes a controllable feature of monitored dynamics rather than an assumption on the Hamiltonian.
  • The same construction supplies a practical method to prepare and study Scrooge ensembles on quantum devices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach may extend to time-dependent or adaptive monitoring protocols that target ensembles beyond thermal or Scrooge forms.
  • Experimental tests could check whether real hardware noise preserves or destroys the 1-design property and thereby the ergodicity.
  • The result suggests that monitored open systems can serve as tunable simulators of structured random ensembles without requiring full unitary randomization.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that, for an arbitrary target density matrix σ, there exists an explicit construction of a continuously monitored quantum many-body system such that the associated jump operators form a deformed unitary 1-design and the Scrooge ensemble of σ is the unique late-time invariant measure on quantum trajectories. The argument consists of an explicit construction of the monitoring operators followed by a uniqueness proof; numerical simulations are presented for cases in which the target equilibrium is thermal.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work supplies an explicit, parameter-free construction and a rigorous uniqueness proof establishing exact Hilbert-space ergodicity under a condition (deformed unitary 1-design) weaker than full ergodicity. This supplies a concrete, falsifiable route to controlled ergodicity on quantum devices and strengthens the theoretical link between continuous monitoring and ensemble equivalence.

minor comments (3)
  1. The numerical demonstrations are described only at the level of the abstract; the manuscript should supply simulation parameters, system sizes, trajectory counts, and quantitative error analysis (e.g., distance to the target Scrooge ensemble) so that the agreement can be assessed.
  2. The precise definition of the deformed unitary 1-design and the statement of the uniqueness theorem should be given as numbered equations or propositions with explicit references in the main text.
  3. A brief discussion of edge cases (e.g., when σ is pure or when the monitoring operators become singular) would strengthen the claim of generality.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and the recommendation for minor revision. The referee's summary accurately reflects the central claims, construction, and uniqueness proof presented in the work.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The central claim is an explicit construction of jump operators satisfying the deformed unitary 1-design condition, followed by a direct uniqueness proof that the Scrooge ensemble of arbitrary target σ is the unique late-time invariant measure on trajectories. No step reduces by definition to its own inputs, renames a fitted quantity as a prediction, or relies on a load-bearing self-citation chain; the 1-design condition is stated as strictly weaker than full ergodicity and the argument is presented as self-contained against the stated hypotheses.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the central claim rests on the existence of monitoring operators satisfying the deformed unitary 1-design property and on the prior definition of the Scrooge ensemble; no explicit free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Jump operators form a deformed unitary 1-design
    This is the key stated condition required for the uniqueness proof to hold.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5723 in / 1192 out tokens · 29275 ms · 2026-07-01T06:19:13.199533+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Quantum evolution is generally expected to drive a quantum many-body system toward equilibrium. This expectation is often justified by the Hilbert-space ergodicity of generic quantum dynamics, namely, the idea that pure-state evolution explores Hilbert space uniformly up to physical constraints. Such a statement can be made rigorous by requiring the associated state ensemble to form the Haar-random ensemble, or its more structured generalization, the Scrooge ensemble. In this Letter, we report the emergence of exact Hilbert-space ergodicity in a continuously monitored quantum many-body system. For any target density matrix $\sigma$, we construct a continuously monitored system for which we rigorously prove that the Scrooge ensemble of $\sigma$ is the unique late-time equilibrium distribution of quantum trajectories. Remarkably, this requires only that the jump operators in the monitoring form a deformed unitary 1-design, a seemingly much weaker condition than full ergodicity. We numerically demonstrate our predictions by simulating continuously monitored systems whose equilibrium states are thermal states. Our results establish a rigorous mechanism for the emergence of Hilbert-space ergodicity and provide a practical route for its investigation on quantum devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.29042 by Liang Mao, Pengfei Zhang, Yue Wu, Yuzhi Tong.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic illustration of our main results. A quan [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Numerical simulation of our protocol. (a)(c) The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Emergence of the Scrooge Ensemble in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Model

    quant-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 7.5

    All moments of the projected ensemble in the SYK model exactly coincide with those of the Scrooge ensemble, generated by replica-permutation saddles of the measurement path integral, even at arbitrarily short times.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 93 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Borgonovi, F

    F. Borgonovi, F. M. Izrailev, L. F. Santos, and V. G. Zelevinsky, Quantum chaos and thermalization in iso- lated systems of interacting particles, Phys. Rep.626, 1 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Gogolin and J

    C. Gogolin and J. Eisert, Equilibration, thermalisation, and the emergence of statistical mechanics in closed quantum systems, Rep. Prog. Phys.79, 056001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    A. M. Kaufman, M. E. Tai, A. Lukin, M. Rispoli, R. Schittko, P. M. Preiss, and M. Greiner, Quantum ther- malization through entanglement in an isolated many- body system, Science353, 794 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Ueda, Quantum equilibration, thermalization and prethermalization in ultracold atoms, Nat

    M. Ueda, Quantum equilibration, thermalization and prethermalization in ultracold atoms, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 669 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Col- loquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 021001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys

    M. Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys. Rev. E50, 888 (1994)

    work page 1994

  7. [7]

    J. M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system, Phys. Rev. A43, 2046 (1991)

    work page 2046

  8. [8]

    Rigol, V

    M. Rigol, V. Dunjko, and M. Olshanii, Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems, Nature452, 854 (2008)

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    T. Mori, T. N. Ikeda, E. Kaminishi, and M. Ueda, Ther- malization and prethermalization in isolated quantum systems: a theoretical overview, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.51, 112001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    D’Alessio, Y

    L. D’Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, Adv. Phys. 65, 239 (2016)

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    Nandkishore and D

    R. Nandkishore and D. A. Huse, Many-body localiza- tion and thermalization in quantum statistical mechan- ics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.6, 15 (2015)

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    Liu, Z.-W

    W. Liu, Z.-W. Pan, F. Yue, W. W. Ho, and X. Rong, Observation of hierarchy of hilbert space ergodicities in the quantum dynamics of a single spin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 020401 (2026)

    work page 2026

  13. [13]

    Pilatowsky-Cameo, S

    S. Pilatowsky-Cameo, S. Choi, and W. W. Ho, Critically slow hilbert-space ergodicity in quantum morphic drives, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 140402 (2025)

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    A. L. Shaw, D. K. Mark, J. Choi, R. Finkelstein, P. Scholl, S. Choi, and M. Endres, Experimental signa- tures of hilbert-space ergodicity: Universal bitstring dis- tributions and applications in noise learning, Phys. Rev. X15, 031001 (2025)

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Pilatowsky-Cameo, C

    S. Pilatowsky-Cameo, C. B. Dag, W. W. Ho, and S. Choi, Complete hilbert-space ergodicity in quantum dynam- ics of generalized fibonacci drives, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 250401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Pilatowsky-Cameo, I

    S. Pilatowsky-Cameo, I. Marvian, S. Choi, and W. W. Ho, Hilbert-space ergodicity in driven quantum systems: Obstructions and designs, Phys. Rev. X14, 041059 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    D. K. Mark, F. Surace, A. Elben, A. L. Shaw, J. Choi, G. Refael, M. Endres, and S. Choi, Maximum entropy principle in deep thermalization and in hilbert-space er- godicity, Phys. Rev. X14, 041051 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Dankert, R

    C. Dankert, R. Cleve, J. Emerson, and E. Livine, Exact and approximate unitary 2-designs and their application to fidelity estimation, Phys. Rev. A80, 012304 (2009)

    work page 2009

  19. [19]

    F. G. S. L. Brand˜ ao, A. W. Harrow, and M. Horodecki, Local random quantum circuits are approximate polynomial-designs, Commun. Math. Phys.346, 397 (2016)

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    Schuster, J

    T. Schuster, J. Haferkamp, and H.-Y. Huang, Random unitaries in extremely low depth, Science389, 92 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    L. Cui, T. Schuster, F. Brand˜ ao, and H.-Y. Huang, Unitary designs in nearly optimal depth (2025), arXiv:2507.06216 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    L. Cui, T. Schuster, L. Mao, H.-Y. Huang, and F. Brand˜ ao, Random unitaries from hamiltonian dynam- ics (2025), arXiv:2510.08434 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    L. Mao, L. Cui, T. Schuster, and H.-Y. Huang, Random unitaries that conserve energy (2025), arXiv:2510.08448 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Unitary Designs from Two Chaotic Hamiltonians and a Random Pauli Operation

    N. Sun and P. Zhang, Unitary designs from two chaotic hamiltonians and a random pauli operation (2026), arXiv:2604.10122 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    Dankert,Efficient Simulation of Random Quantum States and Operators, Master’s thesis, University of Wa- terloo (2005)

    C. Dankert,Efficient Simulation of Random Quantum States and Operators, Master’s thesis, University of Wa- terloo (2005)

    work page 2005

  26. [26]

    Gross, K

    D. Gross, K. Audenaert, and J. Eisert, Evenly distributed 6 unitaries: On the structure of unitary designs, J. Math. Phys.48, 052104 (2007)

    work page 2007

  27. [27]

    Ambainis and J

    A. Ambainis and J. Emerson, Quantumt-designs:t-wise independence in the quantum world, inProceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual IEEE Conference on Compu- tational Complexity(IEEE, 2007) pp. 129–140

    work page 2007

  28. [28]

    Zhang, S

    Y. Zhang, S. Vijay, Y. Gu, and Y. Bao, Designs from magic-augmented clifford circuits, PRX Quantum7, 010344 (2026)

    work page 2026

  29. [29]

    Nakata, C

    Y. Nakata, C. Hirche, M. Koashi, and A. Winter, Ef- ficient quantum pseudorandomness with nearly time- independent hamiltonian dynamics, Phys. Rev. X7, 021006 (2017)

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Y.-N. Zhou, R. L¨ owenberg, and J. Sonner, Realizing uni- tary k-designs with a single quench, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 220403 (2026)

    work page 2026

  31. [31]

    J. Haah, Y. Liu, and X. Tan, Efficient approximate uni- tary designs from random pauli rotations, in2024 IEEE 65th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)(IEEE, 2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    LaRacuente and F

    N. LaRacuente and F. Leditzky, Approximate unitaryk- designs from shallow, low-communication circuits, Com- mun. Math. Phys.407, 51 (2026)

    work page 2026

  33. [33]

    D. N. Page, Average entropy of a subsystem, Physical review letters71, 1291 (1993)

    work page 1993

  34. [34]

    Hayden and J

    P. Hayden and J. Preskill, Black holes as mirrors: quan- tum information in random subsystems, Journal of high energy physics2007, 120 (2007)

    work page 2007

  35. [35]

    Cotler, N

    J. Cotler, N. Hunter-Jones, J. Liu, and B. Yoshida, Chaos, complexity, and random matrices, Journal of High Energy Physics2017, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    D. A. Roberts and B. Yoshida, Chaos and complexity by design, J. High Energy Phys.2017(4), 121

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    Popescu, A

    S. Popescu, A. J. Short, and A. Winter, Entanglement and the foundations of statistical mechanics, Nature Physics2, 754 (2006)

    work page 2006

  38. [38]

    Emerson, Y

    J. Emerson, Y. S. Weinstein, M. Saraceno, S. Lloyd, and D. G. Cory, Pseudo-random unitary operators for quan- tum information processing, science302, 2098 (2003)

    work page 2098

  39. [39]

    A. W. Harrow and R. A. Low, Random quantum circuits are approximate 2-designs, Communications in Mathe- matical Physics291, 257 (2009)

    work page 2009

  40. [40]

    Nahum, J

    A. Nahum, J. Ruhman, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Quantum entanglement growth under random unitary dynamics, Physical Review X7, 031016 (2017)

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    C. W. von Keyserlingk, T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann, and S. L. Sondhi, Operator hydrodynamics, otocs, and en- tanglement growth in systems without conservation laws, Physical Review X8, 021013 (2018)

    work page 2018

  42. [42]

    Huang, R

    H.-Y. Huang, R. Kueng, and J. Preskill, Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measure- ments, Nat. Phys.16, 1050 (2020)

    work page 2020

  43. [43]

    Arute, K

    F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, R. Barends, R. Biswas, S. Boixo, F. G. S. L. Brandao, D. A. Buell, B. Burkett, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, R. Collins, W. Courtney, A. Dunsworth, E. Farhi, B. Foxen, A. Fowler, C. Gidney, M. Giustina, R. Graff, K. Guerin, S. Habegger, M. P. Harrigan, M. J. Hart- mann, A. Ho, M. Hoffmann, T. Huang, T....

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    L. S. Madsen, F. Laudenbach, M. F. Askarani, F. Rortais, T. Vincent, J. F. F. Bulmer, F. M. Miatto, L. Neuhaus, L. G. Helt, M. J. Collins, A. E. Lita, T. Gerrits, S. W. Nam, V. D. Vaidya, M. Menotti, I. Dhand, Z. Vernon, N. Quesada, and J. Lavoie, Quantum computational ad- vantage with a programmable photonic processor, Nature 606, 75 (2022)

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    Elben, S

    A. Elben, S. T. Flammia, H.-Y. Huang, R. Kueng, J. Preskill, B. Vermersch, and P. Zoller, The randomized measurement toolbox, Nat. Rev. Phys.5, 9 (2023)

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    Zhong, H

    H.-S. Zhong, H. Wang, Y.-H. Deng, M.-C. Chen, L.-C. Peng, Y.-H. Luo, J. Qin, D. Wu, X. Ding, Y. Hu, P. Hu, X.-Y. Yang, W.-J. Zhang, H. Li, Y. Li, X. Jiang, L. Gan, G. Yang, L. You, Z. Wang, L. Li, N.-L. Liu, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Quantum computational advantage using photons, Science370, 1460 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    A. J. Scott, Optimizing quantum process tomography with unitary 2-designs, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.41, 055308 (2008)

    work page 2008

  48. [48]

    Boixo, S

    S. Boixo, S. V. Isakov, V. N. Smelyanskiy, R. Babbush, N. Ding, Z. Jiang, M. J. Bremner, J. M. Martinis, and H. Neven, Characterizing quantum supremacy in near- term devices, Nature Physics14, 595 (2018)

    work page 2018

  49. [49]

    Emerson, R

    J. Emerson, R. Alicki, and K. ˙Zyczkowski, Scalable noise estimation with random unitary operators, Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics7, S347 (2005)

    work page 2005

  50. [50]

    Aharonov, J

    D. Aharonov, J. Cotler, and X.-L. Qi, Quantum algo- rithmic measurement, Nature communications13, 887 (2022)

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    Huang, M

    H.-Y. Huang, M. Broughton, J. Cotler, S. Chen, J. Li, M. Mohseni, H. Neven, R. Babbush, R. Kueng, J. Preskill,et al., Quantum advantage in learning from experiments, Science376, 1182 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    S. Chen, J. Cotler, H.-Y. Huang, and J. Li, Exponen- tial separations between learning with and without quan- tum memory, in2021 IEEE 62nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)(IEEE, 2022) pp. 574–585

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Ji, Y.-K

    Z. Ji, Y.-K. Liu, and F. Song, Pseudorandom quantum states, inAnnual International Cryptology Conference (Springer, 2018) pp. 126–152

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    Schuster, F

    T. Schuster, F. Ma, A. Lombardi, F. Brand˜ ao, and H.- Y. Huang, Strong random unitaries and fast scrambling (2025), arXiv:2509.26310 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Movassagh, The hardness of random quantum circuits, Nature Physics19, 1719 (2023)

    R. Movassagh, The hardness of random quantum circuits, Nature Physics19, 1719 (2023)

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    Bouland, B

    A. Bouland, B. Fefferman, C. Nirkhe, and U. Vazirani, On the complexity and verification of quantum random circuit sampling, Nature Physics15, 159 (2019)

    work page 2019

  57. [57]

    Jozsa, D

    R. Jozsa, D. Robb, and W. K. Wootters, Lower bound for accessible information in quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. A49, 668 (1994)

    work page 1994

  58. [58]

    W.-K. Mok, T. Haug, W. W. Ho, and J. Preskill, Nature is stingy: Universality of scrooge ensembles in quantum 7 many-body systems (2026), arXiv:2601.00266 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  59. [59]

    Linden, S

    N. Linden, S. Popescu, A. J. Short, and A. Winter, Quan- tum mechanical evolution towards thermal equilibrium, Phys. Rev. E79, 061103 (2009)

    work page 2009

  60. [60]

    C. Liu, M. Ippoliti, and W. W. Ho, Coherence-induced deep thermalization transition in random permutation quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 100404 (2026)

    work page 2026

  61. [61]

    J. S. Cotler, D. K. Mark, H.-Y. Huang, F. Hern´ andez, J. Choi, A. L. Shaw, M. Endres, and S. Choi, Emergent quantum state designs from individual many-body wave functions, PRX Quantum4, 010311 (2023)

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    W. W. Ho and S. Choi, Exact emergent quantum state designs from quantum chaotic dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 060601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  63. [63]

    C. Liu, Q. C. Huang, and W. W. Ho, Deep thermalization in gaussian continuous-variable quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 260401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    Ippoliti and W

    M. Ippoliti and W. W. Ho, Dynamical purification and the emergence of quantum state designs from the pro- jected ensemble, PRX Quantum4, 030322 (2023)

    work page 2023

  65. [65]

    Chang, H

    R.-A. Chang, H. Shrotriya, W. W. Ho, and M. Ippoliti, Deep thermalization under charge-conserving quantum dynamics, PRX Quantum6, 020343 (2025)

    work page 2025

  66. [66]

    P. W. Claeys and A. Lamacraft, Emergent quantum state designs and biunitarity in dual-unitary circuit dynamics, Quantum6, 738 (2022)

    work page 2022

  67. [67]

    Ippoliti and W

    M. Ippoliti and W. W. Ho, Solvable model of deep ther- malization with distinct design times, Quantum6, 886 (2022)

    work page 2022

  68. [68]

    J. Choi, A. L. Shaw, I. S. Madjarov, X. Xie, R. Finkel- stein, J. P. Covey, J. S. Cotler, D. K. Mark, H.-Y. Huang, A. Kale, H. Pichler, F. G. S. L. Brand˜ ao, S. Choi, and M. Endres, Preparing random states and benchmarking with many-body quantum chaos, Nature613, 468 (2023)

    work page 2023

  69. [69]

    X. Feng, C. Liu, Z. Cheng, W. W. Ho, and M. Ippoliti, Quantum resource localizability transitions in deep ther- malization (2026), arXiv:2606.08756 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  70. [70]

    McGinley and T

    M. McGinley and T. Schuster, The scrooge ensemble in many-body quantum systems (2025), arXiv:2511.17172 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    V. B. Braginsky, F. Y. Khalili, and K. S. Thorne,Quan- tum Measurement(Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 1992)

    work page 1992

  72. [72]

    H. J. Carmichael,An Open Systems Approach to Quan- tum Optics, Lecture Notes in Physics Monographs, Vol. 18 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1993)

    work page 1993

  73. [73]

    Barchielli and M

    A. Barchielli and M. Gregoratti,Quantum Trajectories and Measurements in Continuous Time, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 782 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009)

    work page 2009

  74. [74]

    H. M. Wiseman, Quantum trajectories and quantum measurement theory, Quantum Semiclass. Opt.8, 205 (1996)

    work page 1996

  75. [75]

    A. J. Daley, Quantum trajectories and open many-body quantum systems, Adv. Phys.63, 77 (2014)

    work page 2014

  76. [76]

    Jacobs and D

    K. Jacobs and D. A. Steck, A straightforward intro- duction to continuous quantum measurement, Contemp. Phys.47, 279 (2006)

    work page 2006

  77. [77]

    Habib, K

    S. Habib, K. Jacobs, and K. Shizume, Emergence of chaos in quantum systems far from the classical limit, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 010403 (2006)

    work page 2006

  78. [78]

    Bhattacharya, S

    T. Bhattacharya, S. Habib, and K. Jacobs, Continuous quantum measurement and the emergence of classical chaos, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 4852 (2000)

    work page 2000

  79. [79]

    Fuji and Y

    Y. Fuji and Y. Ashida, Measurement-induced quantum criticality under continuous monitoring, Phys. Rev. B 102, 054302 (2020)

    work page 2020

  80. [80]

    J. A. Gross, C. M. Caves, G. J. Milburn, and J. Combes, Qubit models of weak continuous measurements: Marko- vian conditional and open-system dynamics, Quantum Sci. Technol.3, 024005 (2018)

    work page 2018

Showing first 80 references.