Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 45 references

Anomalous WZW terms in dense QCD under magnetic fields and rotation produce B·∇φ and Ω·∇φ couplings that drive chiral soliton lattices.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-11 11:18 UTC pith:UP5C6Z2W

load-bearing objection Clean, useful reference calculation that systematically packages B+Ω+isospin WZW terms for Nf=2,3 and high-density phases; not revolutionary but solid and citable for CSL work.

arxiv 2607.04929 v1 pith:UP5C6Z2W submitted 2026-07-06 hep-th hep-ph

Revisiting the Wess-Zumino-Witten Term in Nuclear and Quark Matter under Magnetic Fields and Rotation

Markus A. G. Amano , Minoru Eto , Muneto Nitta , Shin Sasaki This is my paper
classification hep-th hep-ph
keywords Wess-Zumino-Witten termchiral anomalydense QCDmagnetic fieldrotationchiral soliton latticeneutral mesonsanomalous currents
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper derives the anomaly-induced Wess–Zumino–Witten terms that appear in the low-energy theory of dense QCD when both magnetic fields and rotation are present. By gauging electromagnetism together with fictitious baryon-number and isospin symmetries, the authors obtain explicit topological couplings of the neutral mesons π^{0}, η and η′ for two and three light flavors, and also for the high-density 2SC and CFL phases. The resulting Lagrangian pieces are proportional to B·∇φ and Ω·∇φ; these terms act as driving forces that can stabilize spatially modulated ground states known as chiral soliton lattices. Because the couplings are fixed entirely by the chiral anomaly, they are universal and supply the microscopic origin of a whole family of topological phases that have been discussed in the dense-matter literature.

Core claim

When electromagnetic, baryon-number and isospin background gauge fields are introduced into the WZW term (or equivalently into the anomalous effective Lagrangian that reproduces the U(1)A Ward identities), the neutral-meson sector of dense QCD acquires topological interactions of the schematic form L ~ (e/4π^{2}f)(μ_B + c μ_I) B·∇φ + (μ_B μ_I / 2π^{2} f) Ω·∇φ, together with analogous coefficients for η and η′. These terms are obtained for both N_f=2 and N_f=3, and survive (with a factor of 1/2 from the condensate charge) in the 2SC and CFL phases.

What carries the argument

The Wess–Zumino–Witten term evaluated on Cartan-valued background gauge fields A_L = A_R = eQ A_Q – Q_I A_I – Q_B A_B, with rotation encoded to linear order by the Lorentz-boosted chemical-potential fields A^μ = μ(1, Ω imes x). After integration by parts this produces the B·∇φ and Ω·∇φ couplings that drive the soliton lattices.

Load-bearing premise

Rotation is treated only to linear order in the angular velocity by boosting the chemical-potential gauge fields, under the assumption that the linear velocity remains much smaller than light speed and that the meson profiles are static.

What would settle it

Compute or measure the baryon charge per unit area on a π^{0} (or η, η′) domain wall in simultaneous magnetic field and rotation; if the charge density fails to match N_B = (e C_ABγ B_z + 2 C_ABB μ_B Ω + 2 C_ABI μ_I Ω)/(2π q_A), the derived coefficients are incorrect.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Chiral soliton lattices of π^{0}, η and η′ can form in dense rotating matter even without a magnetic field, driven by the pure Ω·∇φ terms.
  • Domain walls of neutral mesons carry calculable baryon, isospin and electromagnetic charges and magnetic moments fixed by anomaly coefficients.
  • Axial vortices of the same mesons carry anomaly-induced electric currents proportional to the chemical potentials.
  • The same topological terms survive (with a factor of one-half) in the high-density 2SC and CFL color-superconducting phases, so the soliton-lattice mechanism extends above the deconfinement transition.
  • Simultaneous magnetic field and rotation can be treated uniformly inside a single effective Lagrangian, allowing a systematic search for hybrid topological ground states.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the coefficients are fixed solely by triangle anomalies, lattice or holographic calculations of dense QCD under simultaneous B and Ω should reproduce the same linear combinations of chemical potentials if they capture the anomaly correctly.
  • The equivalence between rotation and a background baryon magnetic field (the Barnett-like effect used here) suggests that any future non-linear treatment of rapid rotation can be rephrased as a non-linear completion of that fictitious magnetic field.
  • The explicit high-density expressions open a concrete window for studying whether chiral soliton lattices persist into the color-flavor-locked regime of neutron-star cores.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper derives the anomaly-induced Wess–Zumino–Witten (WZW) terms for dense QCD under simultaneous magnetic field B and rigid rotation Ω. By coupling electromagnetic, baryon-number and isospin background gauge fields into the standard WZW functional (Sec. 2) and, independently, by matching U(1)A triangle anomalies (Sec. 3), the authors obtain the topological couplings of the neutral mesons π0, η and η′ for Nf=2 and Nf=3 (and the corresponding high-density 2SC/CFL phases). The resulting Lagrangians contain the characteristic terms proportional to B·∇ϕ and Ω·∇ϕ (Eqs. 10, 14, 38–45). These terms supply the microscopic driving force for chiral soliton lattices and related topological ground states in dense rotating matter. An appendix shows that, to linear order in Ω, rotation is equivalent to a spatial component of the chemical-potential gauge field.

Significance. If correct, the results give a unified, anomaly-fixed set of coefficients that control the competition between magnetic and rotational effects on inhomogeneous phases of dense QCD. The two independent derivations (full WZW functional versus elementary anomaly matching) produce identical coefficients and correctly reduce to the known special cases of Son–Zhitnitsky and subsequent CSL literature when μI=0 or Ω=0. Because the coefficients are fixed by triangle diagrams rather than fitted, the expressions are universal and immediately usable for constructing ground-state ansätze that include both B and Ω. The high-density (2SC/CFL) extensions further enlarge the domain of applicability. These are concrete, falsifiable inputs for both effective-field-theory and holographic studies of rotating dense matter.

minor comments (4)
  1. In Sec. 2.3, Eq. (14) the coefficient of B·∇η′ is written √6 e Nc μI / (24 π² fη′). After the canonical normalization φ0 = √(2/3) η′/fη′ used in Sec. 3.2.2 this becomes 3e μI/(8π²) ∂φ0, which matches Eq. (42). A short remark equating the two normalizations would remove any residual ambiguity for the reader.
  2. Appendix A derives the linear-order identification Aμ = μ(1, Ω×x) under the assumption |v|≪1. While this is standard and sufficient for the leading anomaly terms, a one-sentence statement that higher-order rotational corrections (centrifugal terms, frame-dragging, etc.) lie outside the present scope would make the domain of validity fully explicit.
  3. Tables 1–4 list the anomaly coefficients CAγγ, CABγ, au. A brief footnote recalling that these are the standard triangle coefficients (Nc ∑ Q5i Qi^{2} etc.) would help non-specialist readers.
  4. A few typographical inconsistencies appear: “Amanoa” in the author list, occasional missing spaces around ·, and the arXiv identifier in the header. These are easily cleaned.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: WZW and triangle-anomaly derivations are independent, coefficient-fixed, and mutually consistent; self-citations supply context only.

full rationale

The central results (topological Lagrangians ~ B·∇ϕ and Ω·∇ϕ for π⁰/η/η′ in Nf=2,3 low- and high-density phases) are obtained in two independent ways that do not reduce to each other or to fitted inputs. Sec. 2 starts from the standard WZW functional (Eqs. 1–2), inserts Cartan electromagnetic/baryon/isospin backgrounds (Eqs. 3, 9), and evaluates the traces for static neutral mesons, yielding Eqs. 10 and 14 (and the general-Nf form Eq. 16). Sec. 3 starts from the elementary U(1)A anomaly matching condition (Eq. 24), computes the six anomaly coefficients CA… from the charge matrices (Tables 1–4), and recovers identical Lagrangians (Eqs. 38–45) after canonical normalization of the meson fields. Coefficients match known special cases (Son–Zhitnitsky etc.) without free parameters. Rotation is encoded to linear order by the standard boost/Kaluza–Klein identification Aμ=μ(1,Ω×x) (Appendix A), which is derived explicitly rather than assumed by fiat. Self-citations of the authors’ earlier CSL papers appear only for physical motivation and partial prior results; they are not used to force the new Ω or isospin terms. No self-definitional loops, fitted-then-predicted quantities, uniqueness theorems imported from the same authors, or ansatz smuggling occur. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

Purely theoretical derivation; no free parameters are fitted. All inputs are standard QCD anomaly coefficients, the conventional WZW functional, and the kinematic identification of rotation with a background gauge field. No new particles or forces are postulated.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The low-energy effective theory of QCD must reproduce the chiral (triangle) anomaly via the Wess-Zumino-Witten term (or its U(1) reduction).
    Invoked throughout Secs. 2–3; standard since Wess-Zumino and Witten.
  • domain assumption Rotation at linear order in Ω is equivalent to a background U(1) gauge field Aμ=μ(1,Ω×x) (or the corresponding Kaluza-Klein spatial component).
    Stated and derived in Appendix A; used to generate all Ω·∇ϕ terms.
  • ad hoc to paper Neutral meson fields are static and lie in the Cartan subalgebra; backgrounds are constant B and rigid Ω.
    Explicitly assumed after Eq. (7) and in Sec. 2.4 to evaluate the WZW 5-form.
  • domain assumption The axial charge of the condensate is qA=1 (hadronic) or qA=2 (diquark).
    Used to normalize high-density coefficients in Sec. 3.2; standard for 2SC/CFL.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 21779 in / 2281 out tokens · 21234 ms · 2026-07-11T11:18:54.128237+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study anomalous Wess-Zumino-Witten terms associated with the chiral anomaly in dense QCD matter under magnetic fields and rotation. By introducing electromagnetic, baryon number, and isospin background gauge fields, we write down the topological couplings of neutral mesons for the $N_f=2$ and $N_f=3$ cases. The resulting terms contain characteristic contributions proportional to $\vec{B} \cdot \vec{\nabla} \phi$ and $\vec{\Omega} \cdot \vec{\nabla} \phi$, where $\phi$ denotes $\pi^0$, $\eta$, or $\eta'$. These results are relevant to chiral soliton lattices in dense rotating matter.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    J. Wess, B. Zumino, Consequences of anomalous Ward identities, Phys. Lett. B 37 (1971) 95–97.doi:10.1016/ 0370-2693(71)90582-X

    1971

  2. [2]

    Witten, Current Algebra, Baryons, and Quark Confine- ment, Nucl

    E. Witten, Current Algebra, Baryons, and Quark Confine- ment, Nucl. Phys. B 223 (1983) 433–444.doi:10.1016/ 0550-3213(83)90064-0

    1983

  3. [3]

    D. T. Son, A. R. Zhitnitsky, Quantum anomalies in dense matter, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 074018.arXiv:hep-ph/ 0405216,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.074018

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.074018 2004

  4. [4]

    Goldstone, F

    J. Goldstone, F. Wilczek, Fractional Quantum Numbers on Solitons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47 (1981) 986–989.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.986

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.47.986 1981

  5. [5]

    D. T. Son, M. A. Stephanov, Axial anomaly and mag- netism of nuclear and quark matter, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 014021.arXiv:0710.1084,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.77.014021

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  6. [6]

    M. Eto, K. Hashimoto, T. Hatsuda, Ferromagnetic neu- tron stars: axial anomaly, dense neutron matter, and pi- onic wall, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 081701.arXiv: 1209.4814,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.081701

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.081701 2013

  7. [7]

    Brauner, N

    T. Brauner, N. Yamamoto, Chiral Soliton Lattice and Charged Pion Condensation in Strong Magnetic Fields, JHEP 04 (2017) 132.arXiv:1609.05213,doi:10. 1007/JHEP04(2017)132

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    Brauner, S

    T. Brauner, S. V . Kadam, Anomalous low-temperature thermodynamics of QCD in strong magnetic fields, JHEP 11 (2017) 103.arXiv:1706.04514,doi:10.1007/ JHEP11(2017)103

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    Brauner, S

    T. Brauner, S. Kadam, Anomalous electrodynamics of neutral pion matter in strong magnetic fields, JHEP 03 (2017) 015.arXiv:1701.06793,doi:10.1007/ JHEP03(2017)015. 8

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  10. [10]

    Brauner, H

    T. Brauner, H. Kolešová, N. Yamamoto, Chiral soli- ton lattice phase in warm QCD, Phys. Lett. B 823 (2021) 136767.arXiv:2108.10044,doi:10.1016/j. physletb.2021.136767

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j 2021

  11. [11]

    Brauner, H

    T. Brauner, H. Kolešová, Chiral soliton lattice at next-to- leading order, JHEP 07 (2023) 163.arXiv:2302.06902, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2023)163

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2023)163 2023

  12. [12]

    M. Eto, M. Nitta, Quantum nucleation of topological soli- tons, JHEP 09 (2022) 077.arXiv:2207.00211,doi: 10.1007/JHEP09(2022)077

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep09(2022)077 2022

  13. [13]

    Higaki, K

    T. Higaki, K. Kamada, K. Nishimura, Formation of a chiral soliton lattice, Phys. Rev. D 106 (9) (2022) 096022.arXiv:2207.00212,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.106.096022

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  14. [14]

    M. Eto, K. Nishimura, M. Nitta, Dislocations and crys- tallization dynamics of chiral soliton lattices, JHEP 12 (2025) 164.arXiv:2506.16354,doi:10.1007/ JHEP12(2025)164

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Z. Qiu, M. Nitta, Quasicrystals in QCD, JHEP 05 (2023) 170.arXiv:2304.05089,doi:10.1007/ JHEP05(2023)170

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    Brauner, G

    T. Brauner, G. Filios, H. Kolešová, Anomaly- Induced Inhomogeneous Phase in Quark Mat- ter without the Sign Problem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (1) (2019) 012001.arXiv:1902.07522, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.012001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.012001 2019

  17. [17]

    Brauner, G

    T. Brauner, G. Filios, H. Kolešová, Chiral soliton lattice in QCD-like theories, JHEP 12 (2019) 029.arXiv:1905. 11409,doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2019)029

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2019)029 2019

  18. [18]

    Nitta, S

    M. Nitta, S. Sasaki, Solitonic ground state in supersymmetric theory in background, JHEP 10 (2024) 178.arXiv:2404.12066,doi: 10.1007/JHEP10(2024)178

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2024)178 2024

  19. [19]

    M. A. G. Amano, M. Eto, M. Nitta, S. Sasaki, Holo- graphic QCD matter: chiral soliton lattices in strong mag- netic field, JHEP 02 (2026) 240.arXiv:2507.16897, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2026)240

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2026)240 2026

  20. [20]

    Amari, M

    Y . Amari, M. Nitta, Z. Qiu, Phase boundary of nuclear matter in magnetic field, JHEP 10 (2025) 180.arXiv: 2504.08379,doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2025)180

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2025)180 2025

  21. [21]

    M. Eto, K. Nishimura, M. Nitta, Domain-wall skyrmion phase in dense QCD at strong magnetic fields using leading-order chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (18) (2025) 181902.arXiv:2304.02940,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.181902

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.181902 2025

  22. [22]

    M. Eto, K. Nishimura, M. Nitta, Phase diagram of QCD matter with magnetic field: domain-wall Skyrmion chain in chiral soliton lattice, JHEP 12 (2023) 032.arXiv: 2311.01112,doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2023)032

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep12(2023)032 2023

  23. [23]

    Amari, M

    Y . Amari, M. Eto, M. Nitta, Domain-wall Skyrmion phase of QCD in magnetic field: gauge field dynamics, JHEP 05 (2025) 037.arXiv:2409.08841,doi:10.1007/ JHEP05(2025)037

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Amari, M

    Y . Amari, M. Nitta, R. Yokokura, Spin statistics and surg- eries of topological solitons in QCD matter in magnetic field, JHEP 02 (2025) 171.arXiv:2406.14419,doi: 10.1007/JHEP02(2025)171

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2025)171 2025

  25. [25]

    Copinger, M

    P. Copinger, M. Eto, M. Nitta, Z. Qiu, Fermionic domain- wall Skyrmions of QCD in a magnetic field, JHEP 05 (2026) 063.arXiv:2512.22023,doi:10.1007/ JHEP05(2026)063

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  26. [26]

    G. W. Evans, A. Schmitt, Chiral anomaly induces super- conducting baryon crystal, JHEP 09 (2022) 192.arXiv: 2206.01227,doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2022)192

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep09(2022)192 2022

  27. [27]

    G. W. Evans, A. Schmitt, Chiral Soliton Lattice turns into 3D crystal, JHEP 2024 (02) (2024) 041.arXiv:2311. 03880,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2024)041

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2024)041 2024

  28. [28]

    Z. Qiu, M. Nitta, Baryonic vortex phase and magnetic field generation in QCD with isospin and baryon chemi- cal potentials, JHEP 06 (2024) 139.arXiv:2403.07433, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2024)139

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2024)139 2024

  29. [29]

    Hamada, M

    Y . Hamada, M. Nitta, Z. Qiu, Baryons as linked vor- tices in QCD matter with isospin asymmetry, JHEP 02 (2026) 200.arXiv:2509.20844,doi:10.1007/ JHEP02(2026)200

    arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    Hamada, M

    Y . Hamada, M. Nitta, Z. Qiu, QCD phase diagram in a magnetic field with baryon and isospin chemical poten- tials (2 2026).arXiv:2602.11762

    arXiv 2026

  31. [31]

    Mameda, M

    K. Mameda, M. Nitta, Z. Qiu, Baryonic vortices in rotat- ing nuclear matter (3 2026).arXiv:2603.29325

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    Huang, K

    X.-G. Huang, K. Nishimura, N. Yamamoto, Anoma- lous effects of dense matter under rotation, JHEP 02 (2018) 069.arXiv:1711.02190,doi:10.1007/ JHEP02(2018)069

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    Nishimura, N

    K. Nishimura, N. Yamamoto, Topological term, QCD anomaly, and theη ′ chiral soliton lattice in rotating bary- onic matter, JHEP 07 (07) (2020) 196.arXiv:2003. 13945,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2020)196

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2020)196 2020

  34. [35]

    M. Eto, K. Nishimura, M. Nitta, Phases of rotating bary- onic matter: non-Abelian chiral soliton lattices, antiferro- isospin chains, and ferri/ferromagnetic magnetization, JHEP 08 (2022) 305.arXiv:2112.01381,doi:10. 1007/JHEP08(2022)305. 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  35. [36]

    M. Eto, K. Nishimura, M. Nitta, Domain-wall Skyrmion phase in a rapidly rotating QCD matter, JHEP 01 (2024) 019.arXiv:2310.17511,doi:10.1007/ JHEP03(2024)019

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  36. [37]

    M. Eto, K. Nishimura, M. Nitta, Non-Abelian chiral soli- ton lattice in rotating QCD matter: Nambu-Goldstone and excited modes, JHEP 03 (2024) 035.arXiv:2312. 10927,doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2024)035

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2024)035 2024

  37. [38]

    G. W. Evans, N. Yamamoto, D.-L. Yang, V orticity- induced effects from Wess-Zumino-Witten terms, Phys. Rev. D 113 (3) (2026) 036029.arXiv:2510.25459, doi:10.1103/jnlh-ml8m

    work page doi:10.1103/jnlh-ml8m 2026

  38. [39]

    J. A. Harvey, C. T. Hill, R. J. Hill, Standard Model Gauging of the Wess-Zumino-Witten Term: Anomalies, Global Currents and pseudo-Chern-Simons Interactions, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 085017.arXiv:0712.1230, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.085017

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.085017 2008

  39. [40]

    Sakai, S

    T. Sakai, S. Sugimoto, Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD, Prog. Theor. Phys. 113 (2005) 843– 882.arXiv:hep-th/0412141,doi:10.1143/PTP. 113.843

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1143/ptp 2005

  40. [41]

    Abramchuk, Z

    R. Abramchuk, Z. V . Khaidukov, M. A. Zubkov, Anatomy of the chiral vortical effect, Phys. Rev. D 98 (7) (2018) 076013.arXiv:1806.02605,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.98.076013

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  41. [42]

    M. S. Grønli, T. Brauner, Competition of chiral soli- ton lattice and Abrikosov vortex lattice in QCD with isospin chemical potential, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (4) (2022) 354.arXiv:2201.07065,doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-022-10300-5

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/ 2022

  42. [43]

    Y .-Q. Zhao, S. He, D. Hou, L. Li, Z. Li, Phase dia- gram of holographic thermal dense QCD matter with ro- tation, JHEP 04 (2023) 115.arXiv:2212.14662,doi: 10.1007/JHEP04(2023)115

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2023)115 2023

  43. [44]

    X. Chen, L. Zhang, D. Li, D. Hou, M. Huang, Gluo- dynamics and deconfinement phase transition under ro- tation from holography, JHEP 07 (2021) 132.arXiv: 2010.14478,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2021)132

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2021)132 2021

  44. [45]

    Becattini, M

    F. Becattini, M. A. Lisa, Polarization and V orticity in the Quark–Gluon Plasma, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 70 (2020) 395–423.arXiv:2003.03640,doi:10.1146/ annurev-nucl-021920-095245

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  45. [46]

    Becattini, J

    F. Becattini, J. Liao, M. Lisa (Eds.), Strongly Interact- ing Matter under Rotation, V ol. 987 of Lecture Notes in Physics, Springer, Cham, 2021.arXiv:2102.00933, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-71427-7. 10

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/978-3-030-71427-7 2021