Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 75 references

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge.

T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. The mark states how deep the mechanical check went, never who wrote it. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

SPT-3G Summer temperature data yield the first CMB lensing reconstruction over 2640 deg², with amplitude 1.015 ± 0.053 matching Planck ΛCDM.

2026-07-08 19:51 UTC pith:KMPK6K5W

load-bearing objection First SPT-3G Summer temperature lensing: A_L = 1.015 ± 0.053 vs Planck; solid pathfinder with standard methods, foreground residual is the check that matters. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.05784 v1 pith:KMPK6K5W submitted 2026-07-07 astro-ph.CO

CMB Lensing Reconstruction Using Two Years of Temperature Data from the SPT-3G Summer Survey

K. Levy , S. Raghunathan , F. Guidi , Y. Li , E. Anderes , A. J. Anderson , B. Ansarinejad , M. Archipley
show 86 more authors
L. Balkenhol D. R. Barron K. Benabed A. N. Bender B. A. Benson F. Bianchini L. E. Bleem S. Bocquet F. R. Bouchet E. Camphuis M. G. Campitiello J. E. Carlstrom J. Carron C. L. Chang P. M. Chichura A. Chokshi T.-L. Chou A. Coerver T. M. Crawford C. Daley T. de Haan K. R. Dibert M. A. Dobbs M. Doohan D. Dutcher C. Feng K. R. Ferguson N. C. Ferree K. Fichman A. Foster S. Galli A. E. Gambrel A. K. Gao F. Ge S. Guns N. W. Halverson E. Hivon G. P. Holder W. L. Holzapfel J. C. Hood A. Hryciuk N. Huang T. Jhaveri F. K\'eruzor\'e A. R. Khalife L. Knox K. Kornoelje C.-L. Kuo A. E. Lowitz C. Lu G. P. Lynch T. J. Maccarone A. S. Maniyar E. S. Martsen F. Menanteau M. Millea J. Montgomery Y. Nakato T. Natoli A. Ouellette Z. Pan P. Paschos K. A. Phadke A. W. Pollak K. Prabhu W. Quan M. Rahimi A. Rahlin C. L. Reichardt M. Rouble J. E. Ruhl A. C. Silva Oliveira A. Simpson J. A. Sobrin A. A. Stark J. Stephen C. Tandoi C. Trendafilova J. D. Vieira A. G. Vieregg A. Vitrier Y. Wan N. Whitehorn W. L. K. Wu M. R. Young J. A. Zebrowski
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords CMB lensingSPT-3Gcosmic microwave backgroundgravitational lensingquadratic estimatortemperature mapsΛCDMSouth Pole Telescope
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper presents the first reconstruction of the cosmic microwave background lensing potential from the SPT-3G Summer survey, using two years of temperature data across three fields that together cover about 2640 square degrees. A joint analysis of those fields measures the lensing amplitude relative to a Planck 2018 ΛCDM fiducial model as A_comb = 1.015 ± 0.053 for multipoles 50 < L < 2000. The result is statistically consistent with the standard cosmological model and is obtained from temperature-only maps after standard quadratic-estimator bias corrections. A sympathetic reader cares because the measurement already reaches roughly 5 percent precision on a large new sky area and explicitly demonstrates that combining the Summer fields with the SPT-3G Main and Wide fields will raise the signal-to-noise for a total survey footprint of roughly 10 000 square degrees. It therefore supplies an early, concrete step toward higher-precision tests of structure growth via CMB lensing.

Core claim

A joint analysis of the three SPT-3G Summer fields yields a CMB lensing amplitude A_comb = 1.015 ± 0.053 relative to a fiducial Planck 2018 ΛCDM cosmology for the multipole range 50 < L < 2000, obtained from the first temperature-only lensing reconstruction of the approximately 2640 deg² Summer survey.

What carries the argument

The temperature-only quadratic estimator of the CMB lensing potential, applied field-by-field after N0, N1 and mean-field bias corrections and then combined into a joint amplitude fit over 50 < L < 2000.

Load-bearing premise

Residual foregrounds, instrumental systematics and the temperature-only quadratic-estimator bias corrections are controlled well enough that the quoted uncertainty on the lensing amplitude is not systematically biased.

What would settle it

A null-test residual (curl-mode power, cross-correlation with a foreground tracer, or difference of auto- and cross-spectra) that shifts the recovered A_L by more than the reported 0.053 error bar, or a statistically significant tension with independent Planck or ACT lensing measurements on the same multipole range.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The measured amplitude confirms that large-scale structure growth on the scales probed by 50 < L < 2000 is consistent with Planck 2018 ΛCDM at the 5 percent level.
  • Adding the Summer fields to the SPT-3G Main and Wide surveys will raise the total lensing signal-to-noise for a combined footprint of roughly 10 000 deg².
  • Temperature-only reconstructions from SPT-3G alone can already deliver competitive A_L constraints before polarization data are included.
  • The same maps and pipeline enable forthcoming cross-correlations with external large-scale-structure tracers over the Summer footprint.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The demonstrated control of temperature-only biases over 2640 deg² implies that residual systematics will not dominate once polarization is added, allowing the full SPT-3G program to push A_L precision well below 3 percent.
  • A 5 percent A_L measurement already begins to limit simple models of modified gravity or massive neutrinos that rescale the lensing amplitude by more than a few percent.
  • Extending the multipole range above L = 2000 with the same temperature maps, or with future polarization, would test whether the agreement with ΛCDM persists on smaller scales where baryonic feedback becomes relevant.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents the first CMB lensing potential reconstruction from the SPT-3G Summer survey using two years of temperature-only data over ~2640 deg² (three fields of 1210, 570, and 860 deg²). A joint analysis yields a lensing amplitude A^comb = 1.015 ± 0.053 relative to a fiducial Planck 2018 ΛCDM cosmology for 50 < L < 2000. The work uses a standard quadratic estimator with N0/N1 bias corrections and mean-field subtraction, and frames the result as a pathfinder for combining Summer with Main and Wide fields toward a ~10 000 deg² SPT-3G lensing map.

Significance. If the result holds, it is a solid incremental contribution: the first temperature-only lensing reconstruction from the SPT-3G Summer fields, demonstrating consistency with Planck at the ~5% level and quantifying the S/N gain expected from the full ~10 000 deg² combination. The analysis rests on established pipeline elements (quadratic estimator, bias corrections, multi-field combination) and reports a clear, falsifiable amplitude measurement. Strengths include a well-defined multipole range, explicit field combination, and an early-results framing that sets expectations for future polarization-inclusive and multi-survey combinations. The scientific impact is moderate but real for the SPT-3G program and for cross-checks of ΛCDM lensing amplitude.

major comments (3)
  1. The central claim A^comb = 1.015 ± 0.053 is load-bearing only if residual extragalactic foreground bias (tSZ, CIB, radio sources) after masking/filtering is demonstrated to be ≪ 0.03. Temperature-only quadratic estimators receive additive non-Gaussian four-point contributions that are spatially correlated with the true lensing potential; N0, N1, and mean-field corrections address Gaussian/connected CMB terms but do not automatically cancel the foreground four-point. The manuscript must quantify residual bias (e.g., via simulations with realistic foregrounds or template-cleaning null tests) and show it is absorbed into or negligible compared with the quoted 0.053 uncertainty. Without that demonstration the consistency statement and the pathfinder claim for the ~10 000 deg² combination are weakened.
  2. Null-test and systematic-control suite (field-difference, curl-mode, split-half, and foreground-cleaned vs. uncleaned comparisons) must be reported with quantitative pass/fail criteria tied to the 0.053 error bar. The early-results framing leaves these validations as the least secure premise; if any residual systematic reaches even half the statistical uncertainty, both the amplitude and its interpretation relative to Planck 2018 ΛCDM require revision.
  3. The multipole range 50 < L < 2000 and the field-combination weights are free analysis choices that enter the reported A^comb. The paper should show that the amplitude is stable under reasonable variations of L_min, L_max, and weighting scheme (or fold the variation into the systematic error budget) so that the quoted uncertainty is not understated by analysis choices.
minor comments (5)
  1. Clarify the precise definition of the fiducial Planck 2018 ΛCDM spectrum used for A_L (parameter set, lensing spectrum generation code, and any smoothing or binning) so that the ratio is fully reproducible.
  2. State explicitly whether the three Summer fields are treated as independent or whether inter-field covariance is included in the joint likelihood; a short equation or covariance-matrix description would help.
  3. Figure captions and axis labels for the reconstructed lensing power spectrum and A_L bandpowers should include the exact multipole binning and the units of the plotted quantities.
  4. A brief comparison table or paragraph placing the Summer A^comb next to prior SPT-3G Main/Wide and Planck lensing amplitudes would improve context without lengthening the text substantially.
  5. Typographical consistency: ensure A^comb vs. A_L notation is uniform throughout the abstract, body, and tables.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful reading and for identifying three concrete issues that affect the robustness of A^comb. We agree that residual extragalactic foreground bias, a quantitative null-test suite, and stability under multipole/weighting choices must be demonstrated at a level commensurate with the 0.053 statistical uncertainty. We will revise the manuscript accordingly: add a residual-foreground bias estimate (simulations and/or template-cleaning tests), report the full null-test suite with pass/fail criteria tied to the error bar, and show stability of A^comb under variations of L_min, L_max, and field weights (or enlarge the systematic budget). These additions strengthen rather than alter the central consistency result and the pathfinder framing for the ~10 000 deg² combination.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim A^comb = 1.015 ± 0.053 is load-bearing only if residual extragalactic foreground bias (tSZ, CIB, radio sources) after masking/filtering is demonstrated to be ≪ 0.03. Temperature-only quadratic estimators receive additive non-Gaussian four-point contributions that are spatially correlated with the true lensing potential; N0, N1, and mean-field corrections address Gaussian/connected CMB terms but do not automatically cancel the foreground four-point. The manuscript must quantify residual bias (e.g., via simulations with realistic foregrounds or template-cleaning null tests) and show it is absorbed into or negligible compared with the quoted 0.053 uncertainty. Without that demonstration the consistency statement and the pathfinder claim for the ~10 000 deg² combination are weakened.

    Authors: We agree. N0/N1 and mean-field subtraction do not cancel the connected foreground four-point, so residual tSZ/CIB/radio bias after masking and filtering must be quantified relative to the 0.053 error. In the revision we will (i) estimate residual bias with end-to-end simulations that include realistic tSZ, CIB, and radio populations at the SPT-3G frequencies and depths, processed through the same mask, filter, and quadratic estimator; and (ii) where feasible, report template-cleaning or frequency-difference null tests that bound the same bias. We will state the residual bias (or upper limit) explicitly and either show it is ≪ 0.03 or fold a residual systematic into the total uncertainty on A^comb. The consistency statement and pathfinder claim will be phrased only after that demonstration is in place. We do not claim the present draft already contains this quantification at the required level. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Null-test and systematic-control suite (field-difference, curl-mode, split-half, and foreground-cleaned vs. uncleaned comparisons) must be reported with quantitative pass/fail criteria tied to the 0.053 error bar. The early-results framing leaves these validations as the least secure premise; if any residual systematic reaches even half the statistical uncertainty, both the amplitude and its interpretation relative to Planck 2018 ΛCDM require revision.

    Authors: We agree that the early-results framing makes a quantitative null-test suite essential. The revision will report field-difference, curl-mode, split-half (e.g., year or detector-set), and foreground-cleaned vs. uncleaned comparisons, each with a stated pass/fail criterion scaled to the 0.053 statistical uncertainty (e.g., residual amplitude consistent with zero within a fraction of that error, or χ²/dof consistent with the null). Any test that fails or that indicates a residual at a non-negligible fraction of the statistical error will be used either to correct the pipeline or to enlarge the systematic error budget on A^comb, with the interpretation relative to Planck 2018 ΛCDM updated accordingly. We will not leave these validations as implicit. revision: yes

  3. Referee: The multipole range 50 < L < 2000 and the field-combination weights are free analysis choices that enter the reported A^comb. The paper should show that the amplitude is stable under reasonable variations of L_min, L_max, and weighting scheme (or fold the variation into the systematic error budget) so that the quoted uncertainty is not understated by analysis choices.

    Authors: We agree that L_min, L_max, and the field-combination weights are analysis choices that can shift A^comb. The revision will present A^comb (or bandpowers) under reasonable variations of L_min, L_max, and weighting (e.g., inverse-variance vs. equal-area or noise-weighted alternatives). If the scatter is small compared with 0.053 we will state that stability explicitly; if not, we will fold the variation into the systematic error budget so that the final uncertainty is not understated by those choices. The baseline 50 < L < 2000 range and the joint-analysis weights will remain the primary result, with the stability tests documented alongside. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: A_comb is a standard external comparison of reconstructed lensing power to a Planck 2018 fiducial spectrum, not forced by construction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a joint three-field measurement of the CMB lensing amplitude A^comb = 1.015 ± 0.053 (50 < L < 2000) relative to an external fiducial Planck 2018 ΛCDM C_L^κκ spectrum, obtained via temperature-only quadratic-estimator reconstruction of the SPT-3G Summer fields. This is a conventional comparison of a reconstructed four-point estimator against an independent theoretical prediction; the amplitude is not defined from, fitted to, or forced equal to the SPT-3G data by construction. Standard N0/N1 bias corrections and mean-field subtraction remove Gaussian and connected CMB contributions but do not redefine the residual signal as identical to the input fiducial. Self-citations to prior SPT-3G map-making or pipeline papers are ordinary methodological references and do not supply a load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz that closes a circular loop on A_comb. The result remains externally falsifiable against Planck and other lensing measurements. No self-definitional identity, fitted-input-as-prediction, uniqueness-imported-from-authors, or renaming-of-known-result step appears in the derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The measurement rests on standard ΛCDM cosmology as the fiducial spectrum, the validity of the quadratic estimator for temperature-only lensing, and the usual suite of bias corrections and foreground-cleaning assumptions. No new free parameters are introduced to force A_L; the amplitude is measured against an external Planck 2018 spectrum. No invented particles or mediators. Free parameters are limited to analysis choices (multipole cuts, field weights) that are conventional rather than fitted to produce the central number.

free parameters (2)
  • multipole range L_min, L_max
    Analysis multipole cuts 50 < L < 2000 are chosen by the collaboration; they define the reported A_comb bandpower range and are conventional but not uniquely forced.
  • field combination weights
    Relative weights of the three Summer fields (1210, 570, 860 deg²) in the joint A_comb enter the combined amplitude; typically inverse-variance and not free in the sense of fitting A_L, but still analysis choices.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Planck 2018 ΛCDM provides the correct fiducial lensing power spectrum shape against which A_L is measured.
    A_comb is defined relative to this external cosmology; shape mismatch would bias the single-parameter amplitude.
  • domain assumption Quadratic estimator of the lensing potential from temperature maps is unbiased after N0/N1 and mean-field corrections.
    Standard CMB lensing reconstruction premise; load-bearing for interpreting the measured spectrum as cosmological lensing.
  • domain assumption Residual Galactic and extragalactic foregrounds after cleaning do not bias A_L at a level comparable to the statistical error.
    Temperature-only lensing is foreground-sensitive; this is the usual unproved-in-abstract control assumption.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6812 in / 2626 out tokens · 33994 ms · 2026-07-08T19:51:29.414453+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present the first reconstruction of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing potential from the SPT-3G Summer survey using two years of temperature data. The Summer survey has a total area of approximately 2640 deg$^2$, split into three fields covering 1210, 570, and 860 deg$^2$, respectively. A joint analysis of the three Summer fields yields a lensing amplitude of $A^{\rm comb} = 1.015 \pm 0.053$ relative to a fiducial Planck 2018 $\Lambda$CDM cosmology for the multipole range $50 < L < 2000$. These early results from the SPT-3G Summer survey highlight the potential for increasing the signal-to-noise ratio when combining the Summer fields with the SPT-3G Main and Wide fields for a total SPT-3G survey area of $\sim$ 10,000 deg$^2$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages · 65 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Weak Gravitational Lensing of the CMB

    A. Lewis and A. Challinor, Physics Reports429, 1 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0601594 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  2. [2]

    Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S. Basak, K. Benabed, J. P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. J. Bock, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, F. R. Bouchet, F. Boulanger, M. Bucher, C. Burigana, R. C. Butler, E. Calabrese, J. F. Cardoso, J. Carron, B. Casa...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  3. [3]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and $\Lambda$CDM Parameters

    T. Louis, A. La Posta, Z. Atkins, H. T. Jense, I. Abril-Cabezas, G. E. Addison, P. A. R. Ade, S. Aiola, T. Alford, D. Alonso, M. Amiri, R. An, J. E. Austermann, E. Barbavara, N. Battaglia, E. S. Battistelli, J. A. Beall, R. Bean, A. Beheshti, B. Beringue, T. Bhandarkar, E. Biermann, B. Bolliet, J. R. Bond, E. Calabrese, V. Capalbo, F. Carrero, S.-F. Chen,...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    SPT-3G D1: CMB temperature and polarization power spectra and cosmology from 2019 and 2020 observations of the SPT-3G Main field

    E. Camphuis, W. Quan, L. Balkenhol, A. R. Khalife, F. Ge, F. Guidi, N. Huang, G. P. Lynch, Y. Omori, C. Trendafilova, A. J. Anderson, B. Ansarinejad, M. Archipley, P. S. Barry, K. Benabed, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, F. Bianchini, L. E. Bleem, F. R. Bouchet, L. Bryant, M. G. Campitiello, J. E. Carlstrom, C. L. Chang, P. Chaubal, P. M. Chichura, A. Chokshi...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Blanchard and J

    A. Blanchard and J. Schneider, AAP184, 1 (1987)

    work page 1987

  6. [6]

    CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps

    J. Carron, M. Mirmelstein, and A. Lewis, JCAP2022, 039 (2022), arXiv:2206.07773 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    F. J. Qu, B. D. Sherwin, M. S. Madhavacheril, D. Han, K. T. Crowley, I. Abril-Cabezas, P. A. R. Ade, S. Aiola, T. Alford, M. Amiri, S. Amodeo, R. An, Z. Atkins, J. E. Austermann, N. Battaglia, E. S. Battistelli, J. A. Beall, R. Bean, B. Beringue, T. Bhandarkar, E. Biermann, B. Bolliet, J. R. Bond, H. Cai, E. Calabrese, V. Calafut, V. Capalbo, F. Carrero, ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    M. S. Madhavacheril, F. J. Qu, B. D. Sherwin, N. MacCrann, Y. Li, I. Abril-Cabezas, P. A. R. Ade, S. Aiola, T. Alford, M. Amiri, S. Amodeo, R. An, Z. Atkins, J. E. Austermann, N. Battaglia, E. S. Battistelli, J. A. Beall, R. Bean, B. Beringue, T. Bhandarkar, E. Biermann, B. Bolliet, J. R. Bond, H. Cai, E. Calabrese, V. Calafut, V. Capalbo, F. Carrero, A. ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    F. Ge, M. Millea, E. Camphuis, C. Daley, N. Huang, Y. Omori, W. Quan, E. Anderes, A. J. Anderson, B. Ansarinejad, M. Archipley, L. Balkenhol, K. Benabed, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, F. Bianchini, L. E. Bleem, F. R. Bouchet, L. Bryant, J. E. Carlstrom, C. L. Chang, P. Chaubal, G. Chen, P. M. Chichura, A. Chokshi, T.-L. Chou, A. Coerver, T. M. Crawford, T. ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    F. J. Qu, F. Ge, W. L. Kimmy Wu, I. Abril-Cabezas, M. S. Madhavacheril, M. Millea, E. Anderes, A. J. Anderson, B. Ansarinejad, M. Archipley, Z. Atkins, L. Balkenhol, N. Battaglia, K. Benabed, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, F. Bianchini, L. E. Bleem, B. Bolliet, J. R. Bond, F. R. Bouchet, L. Bryant, E. Calabrese, E. Camphuis, J. E. Carlstrom, J. Carron, A. Ch...

    work page arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    The Quest for B Modes from Inflationary Gravitational Waves

    M. Kamionkowski and E. D. Kovetz, ARA&A54, 227 (2016), arXiv:1510.06042 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  12. [12]

    BICEP/Keck Collaboration, SPTpol Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade, Z. Ahmed, M. Amiri, A. J. Anderson, J. E. Austermann, J. S. Avva, D. Barkats, R. B. Thakur, J. A. Beall, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, F. Bianchini, C. A. Bischoff, L. E. Bleem, J. J. Bock, H. Boenish, E. Bullock, V. Buza, J. E. Carlstrom, C. L. Chang, J. R. Cheshire, H. C. Chiang, T.-L. Chou, R....

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Kaiser, ApJ388, 272 (1992)

    N. Kaiser, ApJ388, 272 (1992)

    work page 1992

  14. [14]

    Weak Lensing Statistics as a Probe of Omega and Power Spectrum

    F. Bernardeau, L. van Waerbeke, and Y. Mellier, AAP322, 1 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9609122 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  15. [15]

    Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review

    M. Kilbinger, Reports on Progress in Physics78, 086901 (2015), arXiv:1411.0115 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  16. [16]

    KiDS+VIKING-450: Cosmic shear tomography with optical+infrared data

    H. Hildebrandt, F. Köhlinger, J. L. van den Busch, B. Joachimi, C. Heymans, A. Kannawadi, A. H. Wright, M. Asgari, C. Blake, H. Hoekstra, S. Joudaki, K. Kuijken, L. Miller, C. B. Morrison, T. Tröster, A. Amon, M. Archidiacono, S. Brieden, A. Choi, J. T. A. de Jong, T. Erben, B. Giblin, A. Mead, J. A. Peacock, M. Radovich, P. Schneider, C. Sifón, and M. Te...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    KiDS+VIKING-450 and DES-Y1 combined: Cosmology with cosmic shear

    S. Joudaki, H. Hildebrandt, D. Traykova, N. E. Chisari, C. Heymans, A. Kannawadi, K. Kuijken, A. H. Wright, M. Asgari, T. Erben, H. Hoekstra, B. Joachimi, L. Miller, T. Tröster, and J. L. van den Busch, AAP638, L1 (2020), arXiv:1906.09262 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Cosmic shear constraints and comparison between two point statistics

    M. Asgari, C.-A. Lin, B. Joachimi, B. Giblin, C. Heymans, H. Hildebrandt, A. Kannawadi, B. Stölzner, T. Tröster, J. L. van den Busch, A. H. Wright, M. Bilicki, C. Blake, J. de Jong, A. Dvornik, T. Erben, F. Getman, H. Hoekstra, F. Köhlinger, K. Kuijken, L. Miller, M. Radovich, P. Schneider, H. Shan, and E. Valentijn, AAP645, A104 (2021), arXiv:2007.15633 ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    T. M. C. Abbott, M. Aguena, A. Alarcon, S. Allam, O. Alves, A. Amon, F. Andrade-Oliveira, J. Annis, S. Avila, D. Bacon, E. Baxter, K. Bechtol, M. R. Becker, G. M. Bernstein, S. Bhargava, S. Birrer, J. Blazek, A. Brandao-Souza, S. L. Bridle, D. Brooks, E. Buckley-Geer, D. L. Burke, H. Camacho, A. Campos, A. Carnero Rosell, M. Carrasco Kind, J. Carretero, F...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    S.-S. Li, H. Hoekstra, K. Kuijken, M. Asgari, M. Bilicki, B. Giblin, C. Heymans, H. Hildebrandt, B. Joachimi, L. Miller, J. L. van den Busch, A. H. Wright, A. Kannawadi, R. Reischke, and H. Shan, AAP679, A133 (2023), arXiv:2306.11124 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    J. Kim, N. Sailer, M. S. Madhavacheril, S. Ferraro, I. Abril-Cabezas, J. N. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, J. Richard Bond, D. Brooks, E. Burtin, E. Calabrese, S.-F. Chen, S. K. Choi, T. Claybaugh, O. Darwish, A. de la Macorra, J. DeRose, M. Devlin, A. Dey, P. Doel, J. Dunkley, C. Embil-Villagra, G. S. Farren, A. Font-Ribera, J. E. Forero-Romero, E. Gaztañaga, V. Glu...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    K. M. Smith, O. Zahn, and O. Doré, PRD76, 043510 (2007), arXiv:0705.3980 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  23. [23]

    S. Das, B. D. Sherwin, P. Aguirre, J. W. Appel, J. R. Bond, C. S. Carvalho, M. J. Devlin, J. Dunkley, R. Dünner, T. Essinger-Hileman, J. W. Fowler, A. Hajian, M. Halpern, M. Hasselfield, A. D. Hincks, R. Hlozek, K. M. Huffenberger, J. P. Hughes, K. D. Irwin, J. Klein, A. Kosowsky, R. H. Lupton, T. A. Marriage, D. Marsden, F. Menanteau, K. Moodley, M. D. N...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  24. [24]

    S. Das, T. Louis, M. R. Nolta, G. E. Addison, E. S. Battistelli, J. R. Bond, E. Calabrese, D. Crichton, M. J. Devlin, S. Dicker, J. Dunkley, R. Dünner, J. W. Fowler, M. Gralla, A. Hajian, M. Halpern, M. Hasselfield, M. Hilton, A. D. Hincks, R. Hlozek, K. M. Huffenberger, J. P. Hughes, K. D. Irwin, A. Kosowsky, R. H. Lupton, T. A. Marriage, D. Marsden, F. ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  25. [25]

    B. D. Sherwin, A. van Engelen, N. Sehgal, M. Madhavacheril, G. E. Addison, S. Aiola, R. Allison, N. Battaglia, D. T. Becker, J. A. Beall, J. R. Bond, E. Calabrese, R. Datta, M. J. Devlin, R. Dünner, J. Dunkley, A. E. Fox, P. Gallardo, M. Halpern, M. Hasselfield, S. Henderson, J. C. Hill, G. C. Hilton, J. Hubmayr, J. P. Hughes, A. D. Hincks, R. Hlozek, K. ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  26. [26]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A CMB lensing mass map over 2100 square degrees of sky and its cross-correlation with BOSS-CMASS galaxies

    O. Darwish, M. S. Madhavacheril, B. D. Sherwin, S. Aiola, N. Battaglia, J. A. Beall, D. T. Becker, J. R. Bond, E. Calabrese, S. K. Choi, M. J. Devlin, J. Dunkley, R. Dünner, S. Ferraro, – 23 – A. E. Fox, P. A. Gallardo, Y. Guan, M. Halpern, D. Han, M. Hasselfield, J. C. Hill, G. C. Hilton, M. Hilton, A. D. Hincks, S.-P. Patty Ho, J. Hubmayr, J. P. Hughes,...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    A measurement of gravitational lensing of the microwave background using South Pole Telescope data

    A. van Engelen, R. Keisler, O. Zahn, K. A. Aird, B. A. Benson, L. E. Bleem, J. E. Carlstrom, C. L. Chang, H. M. Cho, T. M. Crawford, A. T. Crites, T. de Haan, M. A. Dobbs, J. Dudley, E. M. George, N. W. Halverson, G. P. Holder, W. L. Holzapfel, S. Hoover, Z. Hou, J. D. Hrubes, M. Joy, L. Knox, A. T. Lee, E. M. Leitch, M. Lueker, D. Luong-Van, J. J. McMaho...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  28. [28]

    K. T. Story, D. Hanson, P. A. R. Ade, K. A. Aird, J. E. Austermann, J. A. Beall, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, L. E. Bleem, J. E. Carlstrom, C. L. Chang, H. C. Chiang, H. M. Cho, R. Citron, T. M. Crawford, A. T. Crites, T. de Haan, M. A. Dobbs, W. Everett, J. Gallicchio, J. Gao, E. M. George, A. Gilbert, N. W. Halverson, N. Harrington, J. W. Henning, G. C. ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  29. [29]

    A 2500 square-degree CMB lensing map from combined South Pole Telescope and Planck data

    Y. Omori, R. Chown, G. Simard, K. T. Story, K. Aylor, E. J. Baxter, B. A. Benson, L. E. Bleem, J. E. Carlstrom, C. L. Chang, H. M. Cho, T. M. Crawford, A. T. Crites, T. de Haan, M. A. Dobbs, W. B. Everett, E. M. George, N. W. Halverson, N. L. Harrington, G. P. Holder, Z. Hou, W. L. Holzapfel, J. D. Hrubes, L. Knox, A. T. Lee, E. M. Leitch, D. Luong-Van, A...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  30. [30]

    W. L. K. Wu, L. M. Mocanu, P. A. R. Ade, A. J. Anderson, J. E. Austermann, J. S. Avva, J. A. Beall, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, F. Bianchini, L. E. Bleem, J. E. Carlstrom, C. L. Chang, H. C. Chiang, R. Citron, C. Corbett Moran, T. M. Crawford, A. T. Crites, T. de Haan, M. A. Dobbs, W. Everett, J. Gallicchio, E. M. George, A. Gilbert, N. Gupta, N. W. Halve...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  31. [31]

    Optimal CMB Lensing Reconstruction and Parameter Estimation with SPTpol Data

    M. Millea, C. M. Daley, T. L. Chou, E. Anderes, P. A. R. Ade, A. J. Anderson, J. E. Austermann, J. S. Avva, J. A. Beall, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, F. Bianchini, L. E. Bleem, J. E. Carlstrom, C. L. Chang, P. Chaubal, H. C. Chiang, R. Citron, C. C. Moran, T. M. Crawford, A. T. Crites, T. de Haan, M. A. Dobbs, W. Everett, J. Gallicchio, E. M. George, N. Go...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    Z. Pan, F. Bianchini, W. L. K. Wu, P. A. R. Ade, Z. Ahmed, E. Anderes, A. J. Anderson, B. Ansarinejad, M. Archipley, K. Aylor, L. Balkenhol, P. S. Barry, R. Basu Thakur, K. Benabed, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, L. E. Bleem, F. R. Bouchet, L. Bryant, K. Byrum, E. Camphuis, J. E. Carlstrom, F. W. Carter, T. W. Cecil, C. L. Chang, P. Chaubal, G. Chen, P. M. C...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Planck Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, C. Armitage-Caplan, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown, F. Atrio-Barandela, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, J. G. Bartlett, S. Basak, E. Battaner, K. Benabed, A. Benoît, A. Benoit-Lévy, J. P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. Bobin, J. J. Bock, A. Bonaldi, L. Bonavera, J. R. Bond, J. Borri...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  34. [34]

    Planck Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, J. G. Bartlett, N. Bartolo, S. Basak, E. Battaner, K. Benabed, A. Benoît, A. Benoit-Lévy, J. P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. J. Bock, A. Bonaldi, L. Bonavera, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, F. R. Bouchet, F. Boulanger, M. Bu...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  35. [35]

    Planck 2018 results. VIII. Gravitational lensing

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S. Basak, K. Benabed, J. P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. J. Bock, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, F. R. Bouchet, F. Boulanger, M. Bucher, C. Burigana, E. Calabrese, J. F. Cardoso, J. Carron, A. Challinor, H. C. C...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    P. A. R. Ade, Y. Akiba, A. E. Anthony, K. Arnold, M. Atlas, D. Barron, D. Boettger, J. Borrill, S. Chapman, Y. Chinone, M. Dobbs, T. Elleflot, J. Errard, G. Fabbian, C. Feng, D. Flanigan, A. Gilbert, W. Grainger, N. W. Halverson, M. Hasegawa, K. Hattori, M. Hazumi, W. L. Holzapfel, Y. Hori, J. Howard, P. Hyland, Y. Inoue, G. C. Jaehnig, A. Jaffe, B. Keati...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  37. [37]

    M. A. Faúndez, K. Arnold, C. Baccigalupi, D. Barron, D. Beck, S. Beckman, F. Bianchini, J. Carron, K. Cheung, Y. Chinone, H. E. Bouhargani, T. Elleflot, J. Errard, G. Fabbian, C. Feng, T. Fujino, N. Goeckner-Wald, T. Hamada, M. Hasegawa, M. Hazumi, C. A. Hill, H. Hirose, O. Jeong, N. Katayama, B. Keating, S. Kikuchi, A. Kusaka, A. T. Lee, D. Leon, E. Lind...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    BICEP2 Collaboration, Keck Array Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade, Z. Ahmed, R. W. Aikin, K. D. Alexander, D. Barkats, S. J. Benton, C. A. Bischoff, J. J. Bock, R. Bowens-Rubin, J. A. Brevik, I. Buder, E. Bullock, V. Buza, J. Connors, B. P. Crill, L. Duband, C. Dvorkin, J. P. Filippini, S. Fliescher, J. Grayson, M. Halpern, S. Harrison, S. R. Hildebrandt, G. C...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  39. [39]

    P. A. R. Ade, Z. Ahmed, M. Amiri, D. Barkats, R. B. Thakur, C. A. Bischoff, D. Beck, J. J. – 27 – Bock, H. Boenish, E. Bullock, V. Buza, I. Cheshire, J. R., J. Connors, J. Cornelison, M. Crumrine, A. Cukierman, E. V. Denison, M. Dierickx, L. Duband, M. Eiben, S. Fatigoni, J. P. Filippini, S. Fliescher, C. Giannakopoulos, N. Goeckner-Wald, D. C. Goldfinger...

    work page arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    Testing the $\mathbf{\Lambda}$CDM Cosmological Model with Forthcoming Measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background with SPT-3G

    K. Prabhu, S. Raghunathan, M. Millea, G. P. Lynch, P. A. R. Ade, E. Anderes, A. J. Anderson, B. Ansarinejad, M. Archipley, L. Balkenhol, K. Benabed, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, F. Bianchini, L. E. Bleem, F. R. Bouchet, L. Bryant, E. Camphuis, J. E. Carlstrom, T. W. Cecil, C. L. Chang, P. Chaubal, P. M. Chichura, A. Chokshi, T. L. Chou, A. Coerver, T. M. C...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    CMB Lensing Reconstruction on the Full Sky

    T. Okamoto and W. Hu, PRD67, 083002 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0301031 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  42. [42]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S. Basak, R. Battye, K. Benabed, J. P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. J. Bock, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, F. R. Bouchet, F. Boulanger, M. Bucher, C. Burigana, R. C. Butler, E. Calabrese, J. F. Cardoso, J. Carr...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    J. E. Carlstrom, P. A. R. Ade, K. A. Aird, B. A. Benson, L. E. Bleem, S. Busetti, C. L. Chang, E. Chauvin, H. M. Cho, T. M. Crawford, A. T. Crites, M. A. Dobbs, N. W. Halverson, S. Heimsath, W. L. Holzapfel, J. D. Hrubes, M. Joy, R. Keisler, T. M. Lanting, A. T. Lee, E. M. Leitch, J. Leong, W. Lu, M. Lueker, D. Luong-Van, J. J. McMahon, J. Mehl, S. S. Mey...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  44. [44]

    B. A. Benson, P. A. R. Ade, Z. Ahmed, S. W. Allen, K. Arnold, J. E. Austermann, A. N. Bender, L. E. Bleem, J. E. Carlstrom, C. L. Chang, H. M. Cho, J. F. Cliche, T. M. Crawford, A. Cukierman, T. de Haan, M. A. Dobbs, D. Dutcher, W. Everett, A. Gilbert, N. W. Halverson, D. Hanson, N. L. Harrington, K. Hattori, J. W. Henning, G. C. Hilton, G. P. Holder, W. ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  45. [45]

    A. N. Bender, P. A. R. Ade, Z. Ahmed, A. J. Anderson, J. S. Avva, K. Aylor, P. S. Barry, R. Basu Thakur, B. A. Benson, L. S. Bleem, S. Bocquet, K. Byrum, J. E. Carlstrom, F. W. Carter, T. W. Cecil, C. L. Chang, H. M. Cho, J. F. Cliche, T. M. Crawford, A. Cukierman, T. de Haan, E. V. Denison, J. Ding, M. A. Dobbs, S. Dodelson, D. Dutcher, W. Everett, A. Fo...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  46. [46]

    J. A. Sobrin, P. A. R. Ade, Z. Ahmed, A. J. Anderson, J. S. Avva, R. Basu Thakur, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, J. E. Carlstrom, F. W. Carter, T. W. Cecil, C. L. Chang, J. F. Cliche, A. Cukierman, T. de Haan, J. Ding, M. A. Dobbs, D. Dutcher, W. Everett, A. Foster, J. Gallichio, A. Gilbert, J. C. Groh, S. T. Guns, N. W. Halverson, A. H. Harke-Hosemann, N. L...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  47. [47]

    J. A. Sobrin, A. J. Anderson, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, D. Dutcher, A. Foster, N. Goeckner-Wald, J. Montgomery, A. Nadolski, A. Rahlin, P. A. R. Ade, Z. Ahmed, E. Anderes, M. Archipley, J. E. Austermann, J. S. Avva, K. Aylor, L. Balkenhol, P. S. Barry, R. B. Thakur, K. Benabed, F. Bianchini, L. E. Bleem, F. R. Bouchet, L. Bryant, K. Byrum, J. E. Carlstr...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  48. [48]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Two-season ACTPol Extragalactic Point Sources and their Polarization properties

    R. Datta, S. Aiola, S. K. Choi, M. Devlin, J. Dunkley, R. Dünner, P. A. Gallardo, M. Gralla, M. Halpern, M. Hasselfield, M. Hilton, A. D. Hincks, S.-P. P. Ho, J. Hubmayr, K. M. Huffenberger, J. P. Hughes, A. Kosowsky, C. H. López-Caraballo, T. Louis, M. Lungu, T. Marriage, L. Maurin, J. McMahon, K. Moodley, S. K. Naess, F. Nati, M. D. Niemack, L. A. Page,...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    Fractional Polarisation of Extragalactic Sources in the 500-square-degree SPTpol Survey

    N. Gupta, C. L. Reichardt, P. A. R. Ade, A. J. Anderson, M. Archipley, J. E. Austermann, J. S. Avva, J. A. Beall, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, F. Bianchini, L. E. Bleem, J. E. Carlstrom, C. L. Chang, H. C. Chiang, R. Citron, C. C. Moran, T. M. Crawford, A. T. Crites, T. de Haan, M. A. Dobbs, W. Everett, C. Feng, J. Gallicchio, E. M. George, A. Gilbert, N. ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  50. [50]

    Measurements of the E-Mode Polarization and Temperature-E-Mode Correlation of the CMB from SPT-3G 2018 Data

    D. Dutcher, L. Balkenhol, P. A. R. Ade, Z. Ahmed, E. Anderes, A. J. Anderson, M. Archipley, J. S. Avva, K. Aylor, P. S. Barry, R. Basu Thakur, K. Benabed, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, F. Bianchini, L. E. Bleem, F. R. Bouchet, L. Bryant, K. Byrum, J. E. Carlstrom, F. W. Carter, T. W. Cecil, C. L. Chang, P. Chaubal, G. Chen, H. M. Cho, T. L. Chou, J. F. Clic...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  51. [51]

    W. Quan, E. Camphuis, C. Daley, N. Huang, Y. Omori, F. Guidi, E. Anderes, A. J. Anderson, B. Ansarinejad, M. Archipley, L. Balkenhol, D. R. Barron, K. Benabed, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, F. Bianchini, L. E. Bleem, S. Bocquet, F. R. Bouchet, M. G. Campitiello, J. E. Carlstrom, J. Carron, C. L. Chang, P. M. Chichura, A. Chokshi, T.-L. Chou, A. Coerver, T. ...

    work page arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    K. M. Górski, E. Hivon, A. J. Banday, B. D. Wandelt, F. K. Hansen, M. Reinecke, and M. Bartelmann, ApJ622, 759 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0409513 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  53. [53]

    Full-sky CMB lensing reconstruction in presence of sky-cuts

    A. Benoit-Lévy, T. Déchelette, K. Benabed, J. F. Cardoso, D. Hanson, and S. Prunet, AAP 555, A37 (2013), arXiv:1301.4145 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  54. [54]

    An Inpainting Approach to Tackle the Kinematic and Thermal SZ Induced Biases in CMB-Cluster Lensing Estimators

    S. Raghunathan, G. P. Holder, J. G. Bartlett, S. Patil, C. L. Reichardt, and N. Whitehorn, JCAP2019, 037 (2019), arXiv:1904.13392 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  55. [55]

    A method for subtracting foregrounds from multi-frequency CMB sky maps

    M. Tegmark and G. Efstathiou, MNRAS281, 1297 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9507009 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  56. [56]

    A high resolution foreground cleaned CMB map from WMAP

    M. Tegmark, A. de Oliveira-Costa, and A. J. Hamilton, PRD68, 123523 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0302496 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  57. [57]

    Multi-Detector Multi-Component spectral matching and applications for CMB data analysis

    J. Delabrouille, J.-F. Cardoso, and G. Patanchon, MNRAS346, 1089 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0211504 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  58. [58]

    Agora: Multi-Component Simulation for Cross-Survey Science

    Y. Omori, MNRAS530, 5030 (2024), arXiv:2212.07420 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  59. [59]

    Lensed CMB simulation and parameter estimation

    A. Lewis, PRD71, 083008 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0502469 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  60. [60]

    Efficient Computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models

    A. Lewis, A. Challinor, and A. Lasenby, ApJ538, 473 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9911177 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  61. [61]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Map-Based Noise Simulations for DR6

    Z. Atkins, A. J. Duivenvoorden, W. R. Coulton, F. J. Qu, S. Aiola, E. Calabrese, G. E. Chesmore, S. K. Choi, M. J. Devlin, J. Dunkley, C. Hervías-Caimapo, Y. Guan, A. L. Posta, Z. Li, T. Louis, M. S. Madhavacheril, K. Moodley, S. Naess, F. Nati, M. D. Niemack, L. Page, R. Puddu, M. Salatino, C. Sifón, S. T. Staggs, C. Vargas, E. M. Vavagiakis, and E. J. W...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  62. [62]

    M. S. Madhavacheril, K. M. Smith, B. D. Sherwin, and S. Naess, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2011.02475 (2020), arXiv:2011.02475 [astro-ph.CO] . – 31 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  63. [63]

    The shape of the CMB lensing bispectrum

    A. Lewis, A. Challinor, and D. Hanson, JCAP2011, 018 (2011), arXiv:1101.2234 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  64. [64]

    Lensing Reconstruction with CMB Temperature and Polarization

    M. Kesden, A. Cooray, and M. Kamionkowski, PRD67, 123507 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0302536 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  65. [65]

    CMB temperature lensing power reconstruction

    D. Hanson, A. Challinor, G. Efstathiou, and P. Bielewicz, PRD83, 043005 (2011), arXiv:1008.4403 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  66. [66]

    CMB lensing reconstruction biases in cross-correlation with large-scale structure probes

    G. Fabbian, A. Lewis, and D. Beck, JCAP2019, 057 (2019), arXiv:1906.08760 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  67. [67]

    Bias-Hardened CMB Lensing

    T. Namikawa, D. Hanson, and R. Takahashi, MNRAS431, 609 (2013), arXiv:1209.0091 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  68. [68]

    Full-sky lensing reconstruction of gradient and curl modes from CMB maps

    T. Namikawa, D. Yamauchi, and A. Taruya, JCAP2012, 007 (2012), arXiv:1110.1718 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  69. [69]

    Cosmic Shear of the Microwave Background: The Curl Diagnostic

    A. Cooray, M. Kamionkowski, and R. R. Caldwell, PRD71, 123527 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0503002 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  70. [70]

    LSST Science Collaboration, P. A. Abell, J. Allison, S. F. Anderson, J. R. Andrew, J. R. P. Angel, L. Armus, D. Arnett, S. J. Asztalos, T. S. Axelrod, S. Bailey, D. R. Ballantyne, J. R. Bankert, W. A. Barkhouse, J. D. Barr, L. F. Barrientos, A. J. Barth, J. G. Bartlett, A. C. Becker, J. Becla, T. C. Beers, J. P. Bernstein, R. Biswas, M. R. Blanton, J. S. ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  71. [71]

    Mellier, Abdurro’uf, J

    Euclid Collaboration, Y. Mellier, Abdurro’uf, J. A. Acevedo Barroso, A. Achúcarro, J. Adamek, R. Adam, G. E. Addison, N. Aghanim, M. Aguena, V. Ajani, Y. Akrami, A. Al-Bahlawan, A. Alavi, I. S. Albuquerque, G. Alestas, G. Alguero, A. Allaoui, S. W. Allen, V. Allevato, A. V. Alonso-Tetilla, B. Altieri, A. Alvarez-Candal, S. Alvi, A. Amara, L. Amendola, J. ...

    work page arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    OSG, “Ospool,” (2006)

    work page 2006

  73. [73]

    Pordes, D

    R. Pordes, D. Petravick, B. Kramer, D. Olson, M. Livny, A. Roy, P. Avery, K. Blackburn, T. Wenaus, F. Würthwein, I. Foster, R. Gardner, M. Wilde, A. Blatecky, J. McGee, and R. Quick, inJ. Phys. Conf. Ser., 78, Vol. 78 (2007) p. 012057

    work page 2007

  74. [74]

    Pordeset al.,Scientific discovery through advanced computing

    R. Pordeset al.,Scientific discovery through advanced computing. Proceedings, 3rd Annual Conference, SciDAC 2007, Boston, USA, June 24-28, 2007, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.78, 012057 (2007)

    work page 2007

  75. [75]

    Sfiligoi, D

    I. Sfiligoi, D. C. Bradley, B. Holzman, P. Mhashilkar, S. Padhi, and F. Wurthwein, in2009 WRI World Congress on Computer Science and Information Engineering, 2, Vol. 2 (2009) pp. 428–432. – 33 –

    work page 2009