Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 80 references

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge.

T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. The mark states how deep the mechanical check went, never who wrote it. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

Electron-impact excitation cross sections for polyatomics become analytical from ab initio data, no fitting

2026-07-08 19:26 UTC pith:SJ553N75

load-bearing objection A clean, fitting-free analytical bridge from LR-TDDFT amplitudes to electron-impact excitation cross sections that looks useful for polyatomics, though the near-threshold agreement sits on BE assumptions that are not guaranteed there. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.05930 v1 pith:SJ553N75 submitted 2026-07-07 physics.chem-ph physics.atm-clusphysics.plasm-ph

Direct Analytical Evaluation of Electron-Impact Excitation Cross Sections via Multiconfigurational Binary Encounter Approach: Applications to Benzene and Naphthalene

Kaoru Yamazaki This is my paper
classification physics.chem-ph physics.atm-clusphysics.plasm-ph PACS 34.80.Gs31.15.ee33.80.-b
keywords electron-impact excitationbinary encounterMott-Masseycross sectionbenzenenaphthaleneLR-TDDFTdipole-allowed transitions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper offers a multiconfigurational binary-encounter method that turns standard ab initio excited-state amplitudes and orbital energies into closed-form electron-impact electronic excitation cross sections for dipole-allowed transitions. The key step is an amplitude-weighted average binding energy that feeds a threshold-modified Mott-Massey formula scaled by binary-encounter factors, with no molecule-specific adjustable constants. For benzene the calculated 1¹E1u (π→π*) band matches measured integral cross sections between 10 and 20 eV and improves on earlier multichannel results in that window; for naphthalene the total excitation cross section tracks the onset and main peak of the gas-phase apparent fluorescence cross section used as an emission proxy. Analytic peak-position and peak-height formulas show that typical valence excitations crest near 1.5–1.6 times the excitation energy and are strongly attenuated by the binding-energy factor. The framework is presented as a cheap, transferable route for modeling electron-impact excitation of polyatomic molecules whenever finite oscillator strengths and compatible orbital data are available.

Core claim

A multiconfigurational binary-encounter (MC-BE) framework combined with the threshold-modified Mott-Massey approximation yields direct analytical integral cross sections for dipole-allowed electron-impact excitations from linear-response TDDFT amplitudes and orbital energies, without system-specific fitting; the amplitude-weighted effective binding energy supplies the sole BE/BEf prefactor, and the resulting curves for benzene’s dominant 1¹E1u band and naphthalene’s total excitation agree with available experimental benchmarks in the 10–20 eV region.

What carries the argument

The amplitude-weighted average binding energy ⟨B⟩ extracted from LR-TDDFT transition amplitudes, inserted into the threshold-modified Mott-Massey formula scaled by binary-encounter (BE/BEf) factors; this single effective binding energy, together with the excitation energy ΔE and oscillator strength, closes the analytic expression for the integral cross section.

Load-bearing premise

That an amplitude-weighted average of occupied-orbital binding energies is a sufficient effective binding energy for the binary-encounter prefactor, and that the threshold-modified Mott-Massey scaling then captures the energy dependence of polyatomic valence-excitation cross sections without higher-order multichannel or polarization corrections.

What would settle it

Measure absolute integral electron-impact excitation cross sections for the benzene 1¹E1u band or naphthalene total excitation between roughly 8 and 30 eV; systematic disagreement with the parameter-free MC-BE/TMMM curves (especially peak location near 1.5–1.6 ΔE or absolute height) would falsify the framework.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Typical valence dipole-allowed excitations of polyatomics peak at incident energies T ≃ 1.5–1.6 ΔE with substantial binary-encounter attenuation, giving a direct diagnostic that links measured peak positions to excitation energies.
  • Cross sections for any molecule whose excited states supply compatible transition amplitudes and orbital energies can be obtained analytically without empirical energy shifts or intensity scaling.
  • The same closed-form expressions supply inexpensive estimates for electron-energy-loss modeling, atmospheric or plasma chemistry, and radiation-damage pathways involving polyaromatics.
  • Comparison with higher-level scattering methods becomes a targeted test of residual multichannel and polarization effects once the binary-encounter baseline is fixed.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the method is transferable to any excited-state theory that yields amplitudes and orbital energies, it can be paired with higher-accuracy wave-function methods to isolate the residual error of the binary-encounter energy dependence itself.
  • The analytic peak-position formula suggests that gas-phase fluorescence or energy-loss spectra of larger polycyclic aromatics could be used to extract effective ⟨B⟩/ΔE ratios without absolute cross-section measurements.
  • If the amplitude-weighted ⟨B⟩ proves robust, the same construction may extend to dipole-forbidden or spin-forbidden channels once appropriate generalized oscillator strengths replace the optical oscillator strength.
  • The absence of system-specific fitting makes the curves natural reference baselines against which more expensive multichannel calculations can be calibrated for larger molecules.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a multiconfigurational binary-encounter (MC-BE) framework that combines threshold-modified Mott–Massey (TMMM) kinematics with BE/BEf scaling to obtain analytical integral electron-impact excitation cross sections for dipole-allowed transitions. The sole non-kinematic input is an effective binding energy ⟨B⟩ constructed as an amplitude-weighted average of occupied-orbital binding energies taken from LR-TDDFT transition amplitudes, with no system-specific fitting. Applications are reported for the benzene 1¹E1u (π→π*) band, where the calculated cross sections are stated to agree with experiment at T = 10–20 eV and to improve on the SMC/tCIS results of Falkowski et al., and for naphthalene, where the total excitation cross section is stated to reproduce the onset and principal maximum of the gas-phase apparent fluorescence cross section without empirical energy shifts or intensity scaling. Analytic peak-location and peak-height formulae parameterized by r = ⟨B⟩/ΔE are also derived.

Significance. If the construction is reliable, the work would supply a low-cost, parameter-free route from standard excited-state electronic-structure output to energy-dependent integral excitation cross sections for polyatomic molecules—material that is otherwise expensive to obtain from multichannel scattering calculations. Explicit credit is due for the parameter-free definition of ⟨B⟩, the absence of post-hoc energy/intensity scaling in the naphthalene comparison, the closed-form peak diagnostics in r, and the stated transferability to other amplitude-providing excited-state methods. Those features make the proposal practically attractive for radiation chemistry, plasma modeling, and astrophysical applications if the underlying approximations hold in the claimed energy window.

major comments (4)
  1. [Method / BE–BEf prefactor and ⟨B⟩ definition] The central load-bearing step is the identification of the BE/BEf prefactor binding energy with the amplitude-weighted occupied-orbital average ⟨B⟩ extracted from LR-TDDFT. Binary-encounter theory is a high-energy, single-channel picture; near-threshold polyatomic valence excitation (the 10–20 eV window emphasized for benzene) is known to be shaped by polarization, shape resonances, and multichannel coupling. The manuscript must demonstrate, with a concrete sensitivity test or comparison against a multichannel reference for at least one transition, that these effects are not merely absorbed fortuitously into ⟨B⟩. Without that, the reported improvement over SMC/tCIS and the claim of a transferable, parameter-free method remain under-supported.
  2. [Naphthalene results / fluorescence proxy] The naphthalene validation treats the gas-phase apparent fluorescence cross section as an unscaled, energy-independent proxy for the total dipole-allowed excitation ICS. That identification fails if the fluorescence quantum yield varies with incident energy or if non-radiative channels open above the principal maximum. The manuscript should either (i) cite independent evidence that the quantum yield is approximately constant over the compared energy range, or (ii) reframe the comparison as a shape/onset test rather than a quantitative cross-section validation, and quantify residual scale freedom.
  3. [Analytic peak-position / peak-height expressions] The analytic peak-location formula T ≃ 1.5–1.6 ΔE is a direct algebraic consequence of the same BE/TMMM construction parameterized by r = ⟨B⟩/ΔE. It therefore inherits the validity limits of that construction and cannot be presented as independent empirical support. The manuscript should state this dependence explicitly and, if peak positions are used diagnostically against experiment, show that the observed peaks are not better explained by resonance structure outside the BE model.
  4. [Benzene results / comparison with experiment and Falkowski et al.] For the benzene 1¹E1u comparison, the claim of improvement over Falkowski et al. (SMC/tCIS) at T = 10–20 eV needs a quantitative, energy-resolved error metric (e.g., mean absolute or integrated relative deviation against the same experimental data set) and a clear statement of which experimental reference and absolute scale are used. Qualitative ‘good agreement’ language is insufficient to underwrite the central claim of practical superiority in the near-threshold window.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Computational details] State the precise LR-TDDFT functional, basis set, and any continuum or diffuse augmentation used to generate the transition amplitudes and orbital energies that enter ⟨B⟩, so that the amplitude-weighted average is reproducible.
  2. [Theory section] Define the threshold-modified Mott–Massey (TMMM) formula and the BE/BEf scaling factor with explicit equations and the kinematic variables (T, ΔE, ⟨B⟩) before applications, so that the analytic peak formulae can be checked by the reader.
  3. [Naphthalene results] Clarify whether the reported naphthalene ‘total excitation cross section’ is a coherent sum over a defined set of dipole-allowed states or an incoherent sum of individual MC-BE channels, and list which states are retained.
  4. [Discussion / outlook] When claiming transferability beyond LR-TDDFT, give at least one concrete example of the amplitude and orbital-energy interface expected from an alternative method (e.g., EOM-CC or CASSCF/CASPT2) so that the claim is operational rather than aspirational.
  5. [Figures] Ensure figure captions for benzene and naphthalene cross sections identify the experimental data sources, units, and whether any vertical or horizontal offsets were applied (the text claims none for naphthalene; the figures should make that visually unambiguous).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

4 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful and constructive report. The four major comments identify genuine points of under-support in the original manuscript: the load-bearing status of ⟨B⟩ near threshold, the fluorescence-proxy identification for naphthalene, the non-independence of the analytic peak formulae, and the lack of a quantitative error metric for the benzene comparison. We accept each of these as requiring revision. Below we answer point by point, stating what will change in the next version and where we retain (with clarified caveats) the original claims. We believe the revised manuscript will meet the standard of a transferable, parameter-free method whose domain of validity is stated honestly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Method / BE–BEf prefactor and ⟨B⟩ definition] The central load-bearing step is the identification of the BE/BEf prefactor binding energy with the amplitude-weighted occupied-orbital average ⟨B⟩ extracted from LR-TDDFT. Binary-encounter theory is a high-energy, single-channel picture; near-threshold polyatomic valence excitation (the 10–20 eV window emphasized for benzene) is known to be shaped by polarization, shape resonances, and multichannel coupling. The manuscript must demonstrate, with a concrete sensitivity test or comparison against a multichannel reference for at least one transition, that these effects are not merely absorbed fortuitously into ⟨B⟩. Without that, the reported improvement over SMC/tCIS and the claim of a transferable, parameter-free method remain under-supported.

    Authors: We agree that this is the central methodological claim and that the original text under-supported it. Two concrete steps will be taken. (i) Sensitivity test: we will add a figure and short subsection in which ⟨B⟩ for the benzene 1¹E1u band is varied by ±20–30% about the LR-TDDFT amplitude-weighted value while all other inputs are held fixed, and the resulting ICS profiles are compared with the same experimental data set. This shows how much of the near-threshold shape is controlled by ⟨B⟩ versus the TMMM kinematic factors. (ii) Multichannel reference: the existing comparison with Falkowski et al. (SMC/tCIS) already supplies a multichannel, ab initio benchmark for the same transition and energy window; we will expand the discussion to state explicitly what that comparison does and does not establish—namely, that MC-BE/TMMM tracks the experimental magnitude better than SMC/tCIS in 10–20 eV, while remaining silent on resonance substructure that SMC can in principle resolve. We will also add a clear limitations paragraph stating that polarization and multichannel coupling are not modeled microscopically and that agreement in the present window does not prove they are absent, only that the effective ⟨B⟩ construction plus TMMM kinematics is empirically adequate for the integral, dipole-allowed ICS at the level of accuracy claimed. The transferable, parameter-free character of the construction is retained, but the domain of validity will be stated more narrowly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Naphthalene results / fluorescence proxy] The naphthalene validation treats the gas-phase apparent fluorescence cross section as an unscaled, energy-independent proxy for the total dipole-allowed excitation ICS. That identification fails if the fluorescence quantum yield varies with incident energy or if non-radiative channels open above the principal maximum. The manuscript should either (i) cite independent evidence that the quantum yield is approximately constant over the compared energy range, or (ii) reframe the comparison as a shape/onset test rather than a quantitative cross-section validation, and quantify residual scale freedom.

    Authors: The referee is correct that an energy-independent quantum yield was assumed without adequate justification. We do not have independent, energy-resolved quantum-yield data that would rigorously support option (i) over the full compared range. We therefore adopt option (ii). In the revised manuscript the naphthalene comparison will be reframed explicitly as a shape-and-onset test: we will state that the calculated total dipole-allowed ICS is compared to the apparent fluorescence cross section only after both curves are normalized at the principal maximum (or, equivalently, that residual overall scale freedom remains), and that the claimed agreement is restricted to the location of the onset and of the principal maximum. Language that presents the comparison as a quantitative, absolute cross-section validation will be removed. A short caveat on possible energy dependence of the fluorescence yield and on non-radiative channels above the maximum will be added. The absence of empirical energy shifts is retained as a positive feature of the comparison under this weaker, shape-based reading. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Analytic peak-position / peak-height expressions] The analytic peak-location formula T ≃ 1.5–1.6 ΔE is a direct algebraic consequence of the same BE/TMMM construction parameterized by r = ⟨B⟩/ΔE. It therefore inherits the validity limits of that construction and cannot be presented as independent empirical support. The manuscript should state this dependence explicitly and, if peak positions are used diagnostically against experiment, show that the observed peaks are not better explained by resonance structure outside the BE model.

    Authors: We accept the point fully. The peak-location and peak-height formulae will be introduced and used only as algebraic consequences of the MC-BE/TMMM construction for a given r = ⟨B⟩/ΔE, not as independent empirical corroboration. The revised text will state this dependence explicitly (e.g., “these peak diagnostics inherit the validity limits of the underlying BE/TMMM model”). Where experimental peak positions for benzene and naphthalene are compared with the analytic estimate, we will note that the observed maxima lie near 1.5–1.6 ΔE, consistent with the model, but that this consistency does not exclude a contribution from resonance structure outside the binary-encounter picture; the formulae remain useful as a quick diagnostic relating measured profiles to excitation energies within the stated approximation, not as a proof that resonances are absent. No claim of independent support will remain. revision: yes

  4. Referee: [Benzene results / comparison with experiment and Falkowski et al.] For the benzene 1¹E1u comparison, the claim of improvement over Falkowski et al. (SMC/tCIS) at T = 10–20 eV needs a quantitative, energy-resolved error metric (e.g., mean absolute or integrated relative deviation against the same experimental data set) and a clear statement of which experimental reference and absolute scale are used. Qualitative ‘good agreement’ language is insufficient to underwrite the central claim of practical superiority in the near-threshold window.

    Authors: We agree that qualitative language is insufficient. The revised manuscript will (i) identify the experimental reference(s) and absolute scale used for the benzene 1¹E1u band by explicit citation and a short statement in the figure caption and text, and (ii) report quantitative, energy-resolved error metrics—specifically the mean absolute deviation and the integrated relative deviation of both MC-BE/TMMM and SMC/tCIS against that same experimental data set over T = 10–20 eV (and, for context, over a broader window). The claim of improvement will be restated strictly in terms of those metrics for the stated band and energy range, rather than as a general assertion of superiority. Any residual ambiguity about absolute experimental scale will be noted. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: MC-BE/TMMM cross sections are built from external LR-TDDFT amplitudes/orbital energies and compared to independent experiment without system-specific fits or load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The paper’s claimed first-principles content is a standard forward pipeline, not a closed loop. Effective binding energy ⟨B⟩ is defined as an amplitude-weighted average of occupied-orbital binding energies taken from LR-TDDFT transition amplitudes (external electronic-structure input); that single number is inserted into the established BE/BEf-scaled threshold-modified Mott–Massey formula to produce an analytical integral cross section. The abstract and method framing explicitly state that no system-specific fitting parameters, empirical energy shifts, or intensity scalings are used. Validation is against external experimental benchmarks (benzene 1¹E1u ICS; naphthalene gas-phase apparent fluorescence as a dipole-dominated proxy) and against an independent SMC/tCIS calculation by other authors. The analytic peak-location formula T ≃ 1.5–1.6 ΔE is a mathematical consequence of the same BE/TMMM expression once r = ⟨B⟩/ΔE is fixed by the ab initio input; it is a derived property of the model, not a fitted “prediction” of the data used to build it. Binary-encounter and Mott–Massey ingredients are classical literature constructions, not uniqueness theorems or ansätze imported solely from the present author’s prior work in a load-bearing way. Assumptions about the adequacy of a single-channel BE picture near threshold, or about fluorescence quantum yield being energy-independent, are physical limitations of the model (correctness risk), not circular reductions of outputs to inputs. On the paper’s own equations and stated procedure, the derivation chain is self-contained against external ab initio data and external experiment.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

From the abstract alone the central claim rests on the validity of the threshold-modified Mott-Massey approximation, binary-encounter (BE/BEf) scaling, and the identification of an effective binding energy as an amplitude-weighted sum of occupied-orbital energies taken from LR-TDDFT. No free parameters are claimed to be fitted to the target cross sections. No new physical entities (particles, forces, dimensions) are introduced; the ‘MC-BE’ label is a methodological construction. Full free-parameter and axiom lists cannot be audited without the explicit equations and computational details of the full manuscript.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Threshold-modified Mott-Massey (TMMM) approximation adequately describes the energy dependence of dipole-allowed electron-impact excitation cross sections for polyatomic valence transitions.
    Invoked as the base scattering formula that is then scaled by BE/BEf; abstract presents it as given rather than re-derived.
  • domain assumption Binary-encounter (BE/BEf) scaling with an effective binding energy captures the attenuation of the cross section relative to the pure Mott-Massey form.
    Core of the BE prefactor; standard in atomic BE literature but applied here to multiconfigurational molecular excitations.
  • ad hoc to paper Amplitude-weighted occupied-orbital contributions from LR-TDDFT supply a well-defined effective binding energy ⟨B⟩ without further empirical adjustment.
    This is the distinctive multiconfigurational step of the paper; its adequacy is assumed rather than proved from first principles.
  • domain assumption Gas-phase apparent fluorescence cross section is a valid emission-based proxy for the total excitation cross section under dipole-dominated conditions for naphthalene.
    Used as the experimental benchmark for naphthalene; abstract flags the dipole-dominated caveat but still treats the proxy as sufficient.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6482 in / 2831 out tokens · 42497 ms · 2026-07-08T19:26:17.527092+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a multiconfigurational binary-encounter (MC-BE) framework for direct analytical evaluation of electron-impact electronic-excitation cross sections for dipole-allowed transitions from ab initio excited-state data. The method combines the threshold-modified Mott-Massey (TMMM) approximation with binary-encounter (BE/BE$f$) scaling. The effective binding energy in the BE/BE$f$ prefactor is obtained from amplitude-weighted occupied-orbital contributions computed by linear-response time-dependent density functional theory (LR-TDDFT), without system-specific fitting parameters. For benzene, MC-BE/TMMM cross sections for the dominant $1{}^{1}\!E_{\mathrm{1u}}$ ($\pi\!\to\!\pi^{\ast}$) band agree well with experiment at incident energies $T=10$-$20$ eV and improve on the Schwinger multichannel/truncated configuration-interaction singles results of Falkowski et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 159, 194301 (2023)] for this band and energy range. For naphthalene, the calculated total excitation cross section reproduces the onset and principal maximum of the gas-phase apparent fluorescence cross section, used as an emission-based proxy under dipole-dominated conditions, without empirical energy shifts or intensity scaling. Analytic peak-position and peak-height expressions, parameterized by $r=\langle B\rangle/\Delta E$, show that typical valence excitations peak at incident energies $T\simeq 1.5$-$1.6\Delta E$ with substantial BE attenuation, providing a diagnostic for relating measured cross-section profiles to excitation energies. Although demonstrated with LR-TDDFT, the framework is transferable to other excited-state theories that provide compatible amplitudes and well-defined orbital energies. These results support MC-BE/TMMM as a practical, inexpensive route for modeling electron-impact excitation of polyatomic molecules with finite oscillator strength.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.05930 by Kaoru Yamazaki.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (Color online) (a) Electron energy-loss spectrum (EELS) of benzene at 100 eV incident energy and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (Color online) The MC-BE/TMMM calculated electron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Experimental and calculated electron-impact excitation spectra of naphthalene. (a) EELS spectrum at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The MC-BE/TMMM calculated electron-impact excitation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Peak position multiplier [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Comparison between the same-energy ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (Color online) Integral cross section for electron-impact exci [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and Brunger, M

    Tanaka, H. and Brunger, M. J. and Campbell, L. and Kato, H. and Hoshino, M. and Rau, A. R. P. , journal =. Scaled plane-wave Born cross sections for atoms and molecules , volume =. 2016 , doi =

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Brunger, M. J. and Buckman, S. J. , journal =. Electron--molecule scattering cross-sections. 2002 , doi =

    work page 2002

  3. [3]

    Evaluated electron scattering cross section dataset for gaseous benzene in the energy range 0.1--1000

    Garc\'. Evaluated electron scattering cross section dataset for gaseous benzene in the energy range 0.1--1000. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. , pages =. 2023 , doi =

    work page 2023

  4. [5]

    Low energy electron-driven damage in biomolecules , volume =

    Sanche, L\'. Low energy electron-driven damage in biomolecules , volume =. Eur. Phys. J. D , number =. 2005 , doi =

    work page 2005

  5. [6]

    Electron--molecule collision calculations using the R-matrix method , volume =

    Tennyson, Jonathan , journal =. Electron--molecule collision calculations using the R-matrix method , volume =. 2010 , doi =

    work page 2010

  6. [7]

    UKRmol+: A suite for modelling electronic processes in molecules interacting with electrons, positrons and photons using the R-matrix method , volume =

    Ma. UKRmol+: A suite for modelling electronic processes in molecules interacting with electrons, positrons and photons using the R-matrix method , volume =. Computer Physics Communications , pages =. 2020 , doi =

    work page 2020

  7. [8]

    Lima, Marco A. P. and Brescansin, Luiz M. and da Silva, Ant\^onio J. R. and Winstead, Carl and McKoy, Vincent , journal =. Applications of the. 1990 , doi =

    work page 1990

  8. [9]

    and Varella, Marcio T

    da Costa, Romarly F. and Varella, Marcio T. do N. and Bettega, Marcio H. F. and Lima, Marco A. P. , journal =. Recent advances in the application of the Schwinger multichannel method with pseudopotentials to electron-molecule collisions , volume =. 2015 , doi =

    work page 2015

  9. [10]

    and Zammit, Mark C

    Scarlett, Liam H. and Zammit, Mark C. and Bray, Igor and Fursa, Dmitry V. and Schneider, Barry I. , journal =. Convergent close-coupling calculations of electron scattering on HeH+ , volume =. 2022 , doi =

    work page 2022

  10. [11]

    Inelastic Collisions of Fast Charged Particles with Atoms and Molecules---The Bethe Theory Revisited , volume =

    INOKUTI, MITIO , journal =. Inelastic Collisions of Fast Charged Particles with Atoms and Molecules---The Bethe Theory Revisited , volume =. 1971 , doi =

    work page 1971

  11. [13]

    Scaling of plane-wave Born cross sections for electron-impact excitation of neutral atoms , volume =

    Kim, Yong-Ki , journal =. Scaling of plane-wave Born cross sections for electron-impact excitation of neutral atoms , volume =. 2001 , doi =

    work page 2001

  12. [14]

    Density functional theory in quantum chemistry , year =

    Tsuneda, Takao , publisher =. Density functional theory in quantum chemistry , year =

    work page

  13. [19]

    Introduction to computational chemistry, 3rd ed

    Jensen, Frank , publisher =. Introduction to computational chemistry, 3rd ed. , year =

    work page

  14. [21]

    Fully Integrated Approach to Compute Vibrationally Resolved Optical Spectra: From Small Molecules to Macrosystems , volume =

    Barone, Vincenzo and Bloino, Julien and Biczysko, Malgorzata and Santoro, Fabrizio , journal =. Fully Integrated Approach to Compute Vibrationally Resolved Optical Spectra: From Small Molecules to Macrosystems , volume =. 2009 , doi =

    work page 2009

  15. [23]

    , journal =

    Marian, Christel M. , journal =. Spin--orbit coupling and intersystem crossing in molecules , volume =. 2012 , doi =

    work page 2012

  16. [24]

    , journal =

    Marian, Christel M. , journal =. Understanding and Controlling Intersystem Crossing in Molecules , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    work page 2021

  17. [25]

    , journal =

    Kotaru, Saikiran and Pokhilko, Pavel and Krylov, Anna I. , journal =. Spin--orbit couplings within spin-conserving and spin-flipping time-dependent density functional theory: Implementation and benchmark calculations , volume =. 2022 , doi =

    work page 2022

  18. [26]

    Relativistic Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory for Molecular Properties , year =

    Kamiya, Muneaki and Nakajima, Takahito , booktitle =. Relativistic Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory for Molecular Properties , year =

    work page

  19. [29]

    Modeling of High-Harmonic Generation in the

    Wo. Modeling of High-Harmonic Generation in the. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A , number =. 2024 , doi =

    work page 2024

  20. [33]

    Segmented contracted basis sets for atoms H through Xe: Sapporo-(DK)-nZP sets (n = D, T, Q) , volume =

    Noro, Takeshi and Sekiya, Masahiro and Koga, Toshikatsu , journal =. Segmented contracted basis sets for atoms H through Xe: Sapporo-(DK)-nZP sets (n = D, T, Q) , volume =. 2012 , doi =

    work page 2012

  21. [34]

    and Hay, P

    Dunning, Thom H. and Hay, P. Jeffrey , booktitle =. Gaussian basis sets for molecular calculations , volume =. 1977 , doi =

    work page 1977

  22. [35]

    M. J. Frisch and G. W. Trucks and H. B. Schlegel and G. E. Scuseria and M. A. Robb and J. R. Cheeseman and G. Scalmani and V. Barone and G. A. Petersson and H. Nakatsuji and X. Li and M. Caricato and A. V. Marenich and J. Bloino and B. G. Janesko and R. Gomperts and B. Mennucci and H. P. Hratchian and J. V. Ortiz and A. F. Izmaylov and J. L. Sonnenberg an...

    work page

  23. [36]

    and Altarawy, Doaa and Didier, Brett and Gibsom, Tara D

    Pritchard, Benjamin P. and Altarawy, Doaa and Didier, Brett and Gibsom, Tara D. and Windus, Theresa L. , journal =. A New Basis Set Exchange: An Open, Up-to-date Resource for the Molecular Sciences Community , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    work page 2019

  24. [37]

    The role of databases in support of computational chemistry calculations , volume =

    Feller, David , journal =. The role of databases in support of computational chemistry calculations , volume =. 1996 , doi =

    work page 1996

  25. [38]

    and Didier, Brett T

    Schuchardt, Karen L. and Didier, Brett T. and Elsethagen, Todd and Sun, Lisong and Gurumoorthi, Vidhya and Chase, Jared and Li, Jun and Windus, Theresa L. , journal =. Basis Set Exchange: A Community Database for Computational Sciences , volume =. 2007 , doi =

    work page 2007

  26. [43]

    and Nakatsuji, H

    Kitao, O. and Nakatsuji, H. , journal =. Cluster expansion of the wave function. Valence and Rydberg excitations and ionizations of benzene , volume =. 1987 , doi =

    work page 1987

  27. [45]

    and Kukhta, A

    Kazakov, S. and Kukhta, A. and Suchkov, V. , journal =. Fluorescence as a Probe of Energy Dependence of Electron--Molecule Interaction , volume =. 2000 , doi =

    work page 2000

  28. [48]

    and Friedman, Ronald S

    Atkins, Peter W. and Friedman, Ronald S. , edition =. Molecular Quantum Mechanics , year =

    work page

  29. [50]

    and Janesko, Benjamin G

    Henderson, Thomas M. and Janesko, Benjamin G. and Scuseria, Gustavo E. , journal =. Generalized gradient approximation model exchange holes for range-separated hybrids , volume =. 2009 , doi =

    work page 2009

  30. [51]

    Tanaka , author M

    author author H. Tanaka , author M. J. \ Brunger , author L. Campbell , author H. Kato , author M. Hoshino ,\ and\ author A. R. P. \ Rau ,\ title title Scaled plane-wave born cross sections for atoms and molecules , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.88.025004 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 88 ,\ pages 025004 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.025004 2016

  31. [52]

    author author M. J. \ Brunger \ and\ author S. J. \ Buckman ,\ title title Electron--molecule scattering cross-sections. I . E xperimental techniques and data for diatomic molecules , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00032-1 journal journal Phys. Rep. \ volume 357 ,\ pages 215--458 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(01)00032-1 2002

  32. [53]

    Garc\' a-Abenza , author A

    author author A. Garc\' a-Abenza , author A. I. \ Lozano , author L. \'Alvarez , author J. C. \ Oller , author J. Rosado , author F. Blanco , author P. Lim\ ao Vieira ,\ and\ author G. Garc\' a ,\ title title Evaluated electron scattering cross section dataset for gaseous benzene in the energy range 0.1--1000 eV , \ https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CP01908J jour...

    work page doi:10.1039/d3cp01908j 2023

  33. [54]

    Celiberto , author J

    author author R. Celiberto , author J. D. \ Gorfinkiel , author A. Laricchiuta ,\ and\ author J. Tennyson ,\ title title Methods for electron--molecule scattering , \ in\ https://doi.org/10.1088/978-0-7503-3559-1ch22 booktitle Plasma Modeling (Second Edition) ,\ series and number 2053-2563 \ ( publisher IOP Publishing ,\ year 2022 )\ pp.\ pages 22--1 to 2...

    work page doi:10.1088/978-0-7503-3559-1ch22 2053

  34. [55]

    Sanche ,\ title title Low energy electron-driven damage in biomolecules , \ https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2005-00206-6 journal journal Eur

    author author L. Sanche ,\ title title Low energy electron-driven damage in biomolecules , \ https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2005-00206-6 journal journal Eur. Phys. J. D \ volume 35 ,\ pages 367--390 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1140/epjd/e2005-00206-6 2005

  35. [56]

    author author J. Tennyson ,\ title title Electron--molecule collision calculations using the r-matrix method , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2010.02.001 journal journal Physics Reports \ volume 491 ,\ pages 29--76 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.02.001 2010

  36. [57]

    Ma s \' n , author J

    author author Z. Ma s \' n , author J. Benda , author J. D. \ Gorfinkiel , author A. G. \ Harvey ,\ and\ author J. Tennyson ,\ title title Ukrmol+: A suite for modelling electronic processes in molecules interacting with electrons, positrons and photons using the r-matrix method , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2019.107092 journal journal Computer Physic...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2019.107092 2019

  37. [58]

    author author M. A. P. \ Lima , author L. M. \ Brescansin , author A. J. R. \ da Silva , author C. Winstead ,\ and\ author V. McKoy ,\ title title Applications of the Schwinger multichannel method to electron-molecule collisions , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.41.327 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 41 ,\ pages 327--332 ( year 1990 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.41.327 1990

  38. [59]

    author author R. F. \ da Costa , author M. T. d. N. \ Varella , author M. H. F. \ Bettega ,\ and\ author M. A. P. \ Lima ,\ title title Recent advances in the application of the schwinger multichannel method with pseudopotentials to electron-molecule collisions , \ https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2015-60192-6 journal journal The European Physical Journal D ...

    work page doi:10.1140/epjd/e2015-60192-6 2015

  39. [60]

    author author L. H. \ Scarlett , author M. C. \ Zammit , author I. Bray , author D. V. \ Fursa ,\ and\ author B. I. \ Schneider ,\ title title Convergent close-coupling calculations of electron scattering on heh+ , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.106.042818 journal journal Physical Review A \ volume 106 ,\ pages 042818 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.106.042818 2022

  40. [61]

    author author M. INOKUTI ,\ title title Inelastic collisions of fast charged particles with atoms and molecules---the bethe theory revisited , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.43.297 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 43 ,\ pages 297--347 ( year 1971 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.43.297 1971

  41. [62]

    Celiberto , author K

    author author R. Celiberto , author K. L. \ Baluja ,\ and\ author R. K. \ Janev ,\ title title Electron-impact state-to-state resolved cross sections and rate coefficients for the x(v) a(v^ ) excitation in beh molecules , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/22/1/015008 journal journal Plasma Sources Science and Technology \ volume 22 ,\ pages 015008 ( yea...

    work page doi:10.1088/0963-0252/22/1/015008 2012

  42. [63]

    \ Kim ,\ title title Scaling of plane-wave born cross sections for electron-impact excitation of neutral atoms , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.64.032713 journal journal Phys

    author author Y.-K. \ Kim ,\ title title Scaling of plane-wave born cross sections for electron-impact excitation of neutral atoms , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.64.032713 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 64 ,\ pages 032713 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.64.032713 2001

  43. [64]

    Tsuneda ,\ @noop title Density functional theory in quantum chemistry \ ( publisher Springer ,\ year 2014 ) NoStop

    author author T. Tsuneda ,\ @noop title Density functional theory in quantum chemistry \ ( publisher Springer ,\ year 2014 ) NoStop

    work page 2014

  44. [65]

    Kato , author M

    author author H. Kato , author M. Hoshino , author H. Tanaka , author P. Limão-Vieira , author O. Ingólfsson , author L. Campbell ,\ and\ author M. J. \ Brunger ,\ title title A study of electron scattering from benzene: Excitation of the 1b1u, 3e2g, and 1e1u electronic states , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3575497 journal journal The Journal of Chemical P...

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3575497 2011

  45. [66]

    author author A. G. \ Falkowski , author R. F. \ da Costa , author M. A. P. \ Lima , author A. de A. Cadena , author R. Pocoroba , author R. Jones , author M. Mathur , author J. G. \ Childers , author M. A. \ Khakoo ,\ and\ author F. Kossoski ,\ title title Electron impact electronic excitation of benzene: Theory and experiment , \ https://doi.org/10.1063...

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0173024 2023

  46. [67]

    Huebner , author S

    author author R. Huebner , author S. Meilczarek ,\ and\ author C. Kuyatt ,\ title title Electron energy-loss spectroscopy of naphthalene vapor , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(72)80401-9 journal journal Chemical Physics Letters \ volume 16 ,\ pages 464--469 ( year 1972 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/0009-2614(72)80401-9 1972

  47. [68]

    author author J. W. \ McConkey , author S. Trajmar , author K. F. \ Man ,\ and\ author J. M. \ Ratliff ,\ title title Excitation of naphthalene by electron impact , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/25/9/023 journal journal Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics \ volume 25 ,\ pages 2197 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-4075/25/9/023 1992

  48. [69]

    Jensen ,\ @noop title Introduction to computational chemistry, 3rd ed

    author author F. Jensen ,\ @noop title Introduction to computational chemistry, 3rd ed. \ ( publisher John wiley & sons ,\ year 2017 ) NoStop

    work page 2017

  49. [70]

    Santoro , author A

    author author F. Santoro , author A. Lami , author R. Improta , author J. Bloino ,\ and\ author V. Barone ,\ title title Effective method for the computation of optical spectra of large molecules at finite temperature including the duschinsky and herzberg–teller effect: The qx band of porphyrin as a case study , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2929846 journal...

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2929846 2008

  50. [71]

    Barone , author J

    author author V. Barone , author J. Bloino , author M. Biczysko ,\ and\ author F. Santoro ,\ title title Fully integrated approach to compute vibrationally resolved optical spectra: From small molecules to macrosystems , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/ct8004744 journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation \ volume 5 ,\ pages 540--554 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ct8004744 2009

  51. [72]

    Gozem \ and\ author A

    author author S. Gozem \ and\ author A. I. \ Krylov ,\ title title The ezspectra suite: An easy-to-use toolkit for spectroscopy modeling , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1546 journal journal WIREs Computational Molecular Science \ volume 12 ,\ pages e1546 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1002/wcms.1546 2022

  52. [73]

    author author C. M. \ Marian ,\ title title Spin--orbit coupling and intersystem crossing in molecules , \ https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.83 journal journal WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. \ volume 2 ,\ pages 187--203 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1002/wcms.83 2012

  53. [74]

    author author C. M. \ Marian ,\ title title Understanding and controlling intersystem crossing in molecules , \ https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-061020-053433 journal journal Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. \ volume 72 ,\ pages 617--640 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-061020-053433 2021

  54. [75]

    Kotaru , author P

    author author S. Kotaru , author P. Pokhilko ,\ and\ author A. I. \ Krylov ,\ title title Spin--orbit couplings within spin-conserving and spin-flipping time-dependent density functional theory: Implementation and benchmark calculations , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0129124 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 157 ,\ pages 224110 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0129124 2022

  55. [76]

    Kamiya \ and\ author T

    author author M. Kamiya \ and\ author T. Nakajima ,\ title title Relativistic time-dependent density functional theory for molecular properties , \ in\ https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5651-2_10 booktitle Frontiers of Quantum Chemistry ,\ editor edited by\ editor M. J. \ W\' o jcik , editor H. Nakatsuji , editor B. Kirtman ,\ and\ editor Y. Ozaki \ ( pu...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-10-5651-2_10 2018

  56. [77]

    note The original TMMM formulation Celiberto_2013,Celiberto_2022 leaves (T- E_n) implicit, since the argument of the logarithm is already real-valued only for T E_n . Stop

    work page

  57. [78]

    Klinkusch , author P

    author author S. Klinkusch , author P. Saalfrank ,\ and\ author T. Klamroth ,\ title title Laser-induced electron dynamics including photoionization: A heuristic model within time-dependent configuration interaction theory , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3218847 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 131 ,\ pages 114304 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3218847 2009

  58. [79]

    Coccia , author R

    author author E. Coccia , author R. Assaraf , author E. Luppi ,\ and\ author J. Toulouse ,\ title title Ab initio lifetime correction to scattering states for time-dependent electronic-structure calculations with incomplete basis sets , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4991563 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 147 ,\ pages 014106 ( year ...

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4991563 2017

  59. [80]

    author author A. P. \ Wo \'z niak \ and\ author R. Moszy \'n ski ,\ title title Modeling of high-harmonic generation in the C _ 60 fullerene using ab initio, DFT -based, and semiempirical methods , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.3c07865 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry A \ volume 128 ,\ pages 2683--2702 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.3c07865 2024

  60. [81]

    author author A. D. \ Becke ,\ title title Density‐functional thermochemistry. iii. the role of exact exchange , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.464913 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 98 ,\ pages 5648--5652 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.464913 1993

  61. [82]

    Weigend \ and\ author R

    author author F. Weigend \ and\ author R. Ahlrichs ,\ title title Balanced basis sets of split valence , triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for h to rn: Design and assessment of accuracy , \ https://doi.org/10.1039/B508541A journal journal Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 3297--3305 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1039/b508541a 2005

  62. [83]

    \ Chai \ and\ author M

    author author J.-D. \ Chai \ and\ author M. Head-Gordon ,\ title title Long-range corrected hybrid density functionals with damped atom–atom dispersion corrections , \ https://doi.org/10.1039/B810189B journal journal Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. \ volume 10 ,\ pages 6615--6620 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1039/b810189b 2008

  63. [84]

    Noro , author M

    author author T. Noro , author M. Sekiya ,\ and\ author T. Koga ,\ title title Segmented contracted basis sets for atoms h through xe: Sapporo-(dk)-nzp sets (n = d, t, q) , \ https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-012-1124-z journal journal Theoretical Chemistry Accounts \ volume 131 ,\ pages 1124 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1007/s00214-012-1124-z 2012

  64. [85]

    author author T. H. \ Dunning \ and\ author P. J. \ Hay ,\ title title Gaussian basis sets for molecular calculations , \ in\ https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0887-5 booktitle Methods of Electronic Structure Theory ,\ series Modern Theoretical Chemistry , Vol. volume 3 ,\ editor edited by\ editor H. F. \ Schaefer \ ( publisher Springer ,\ year 1977 )\ p...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0887-5 1977

  65. [86]

    author author M. J. \ Frisch , author G. W. \ Trucks , author H. B. \ Schlegel , author G. E. \ Scuseria , author M. A. \ Robb , author J. R. \ Cheeseman , author G. Scalmani , author V. Barone , author G. A. \ Petersson , author H. Nakatsuji , author X. Li , author M. Caricato , author A. V. \ Marenich , author J. Bloino , author B. G. \ Janesko , author...

    work page 2016

  66. [87]

    author author B. P. \ Pritchard , author D. Altarawy , author B. Didier , author T. D. \ Gibsom ,\ and\ author T. L. \ Windus ,\ title title A new basis set exchange: An open, up-to-date resource for the molecular sciences community , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00725 journal journal J. Chem. Inf. Model. \ volume 59 ,\ pages 4814--4820 ( year 201...

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00725 2019

  67. [88]

    author author D. Feller ,\ title title The role of databases in support of computational chemistry calculations , \ https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199610)17:13<1571::AID-JCC9>3.0.CO;2-P journal journal J. Comput. Chem. \ volume 17 ,\ pages 1571--1586 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-987x(199610)17:13 1996

  68. [89]

    author author K. L. \ Schuchardt , author B. T. \ Didier , author T. Elsethagen , author L. Sun , author V. Gurumoorthi , author J. Chase , author J. Li ,\ and\ author T. L. \ Windus ,\ title title Basis set exchange: A community database for computational sciences , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/ci600510j journal journal J. Chem. Inf. Model. \ volume 47 ,\ p...

    work page doi:10.1021/ci600510j 2007

  69. [90]

    Lorentzon , author P.-

    author author J. Lorentzon , author P.- . \ Malmqvist , author M. F \"u lscher ,\ and\ author B. O. \ Roos ,\ title title A caspt2 study of the valence and lowest rydberg electronic states of benzene and phenol , \ https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01113865 journal journal Theoretica chimica acta \ volume 91 ,\ pages 91--108 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01113865 1995

  70. [91]

    author author A. G. \ Falkowski , author R. F. \ da Costa , author F. Kossoski , author M. J. \ Brunger ,\ and\ author M. A. P. \ Lima ,\ title title Electronic excitation of benzene by low energy electron impact and the role of higher lying rydberg states , \ https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/s10053-021-00326-x journal journal The European Physical Journal D ...

    work page doi:10.1140/epjd/s10053-021-00326-x 2021

  71. [92]

    Nakatsuji ,\ title title Solving the scaled schrödinger equation with sac–ci and electrostatic force formalism

    author author H. Nakatsuji ,\ title title Solving the scaled schrödinger equation with sac–ci and electrostatic force formalism. ground, excited, and ionized states of the benzene molecule , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c02112 journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation \ volume 22 ,\ pages 2928--2945 ( year 2026 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5c02112 2026

  72. [93]

    sbrink , author E

    author author L. sbrink , author E. Lindholm ,\ and\ author O. Edqvist ,\ title title Jahn-teller effect in the vibrational structure of the photoelectron spectrum of benzene , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(70)85060-6 journal journal Chemical Physics Letters \ volume 5 ,\ pages 609--612 ( year 1970 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/0009-2614(70)85060-6 1970

  73. [94]

    Kitao \ and\ author H

    author author O. Kitao \ and\ author H. Nakatsuji ,\ title title Cluster expansion of the wave function. valence and rydberg excitations and ionizations of benzene , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.453297 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 87 ,\ pages 1169--1182 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.453297 1987

  74. [95]

    K \'a nn \'a r \ and\ author P

    author author D. K \'a nn \'a r \ and\ author P. G. \ Szalay ,\ title title Benchmarking coupled cluster methods on valence singlet excited states , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/ct500495n journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation \ volume 10 ,\ pages 3757--3765 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ct500495n 2014

  75. [96]

    Kazakov , author A

    author author S. Kazakov , author A. Kukhta ,\ and\ author V. Suchkov ,\ title title Fluorescence as a probe of energy dependence of electron--molecule interaction , \ https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009438832184 journal journal Journal of Fluorescence \ volume 10 ,\ pages 409--412 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1009438832184 2000

  76. [97]

    Rubio , author M

    author author M. Rubio , author M. Merchán , author E. Ortí ,\ and\ author B. O. \ Roos ,\ title title A theoretical study of the electronic spectrum of naphthalene , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0104(94)87016-0 journal journal Chemical Physics \ volume 179 ,\ pages 395--409 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/0301-0104(94)87016-0 1994

  77. [98]

    Falden , author K

    author author H. Falden , author K. Falster-Hansen , author K. Bak , author S. Rettrup ,\ and\ author S. Sauer ,\ title title Benchmarking second order methods for the calculation of vertical electronic excitation energies: Valence and rydberg states in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9037123 journal journal The Journal of P...

    work page doi:10.1021/jp9037123 2009

  78. [99]

    author author P. W. \ Atkins \ and\ author R. S. \ Friedman ,\ @noop title Molecular Quantum Mechanics ,\ edition 5th \ ed.\ ( publisher Oxford University Press ,\ address Oxford and New York ,\ year 2011 ) NoStop

    work page 2011

  79. [100]

    Yamauchi , author Y

    author author M. Yamauchi , author Y. Yamakita , author H. Yamakado ,\ and\ author K. Ohno ,\ title title Collision energy resolved penning ionization electron spectra of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0368-2048(97)00231-4 journal journal Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena \ volume 88-91 ,...

    work page doi:10.1016/s0368-2048(97)00231-4 2048

  80. [101]

    author author T. M. \ Henderson , author B. G. \ Janesko ,\ and\ author G. E. \ Scuseria ,\ title title Generalized gradient approximation model exchange holes for range-separated hybrids , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3185673 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 131 ,\ pages 044108 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3185673 2009