Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 92 references

Schwarzschild black hole built from pure twistor geometry

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · glm-5.2

2026-07-08 12:26 UTC pith:DGJ4YMXN

load-bearing objection First solution of the twistor googly problem — for Schwarzschild specifically — with one load-bearing calculation left implicit. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.06236 v1 pith:DGJ4YMXN submitted 2026-07-07 hep-th gr-qcmath.DG

Schwarzschild black holes from twistor space

Tim Adamo , Bernardo Araneda , Sean Seet , Atul Sharma This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qcmath.DG
keywords twistorspaceholomorphicmetricquadriccomplexnon-self-dualschwarzschild
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Twistor theory has been stuck for fifty years on what Penrose called the googly problem: it can encode self-dual (chiral) solutions to Einstein's equations using holomorphic data, but not solutions that mix self-dual and anti-self-dual curvature, which is what real black holes require. This paper claims to solve that problem for the Schwarzschild metric, the simplest non-self-dual black hole. The construction works as follows. Start with the twistor space of self-dual Taub-NUT, a Euclidean gravitational instanton, written in Kerr-Schild form. Inside this curved twistor space, place a quadric surface defined by the principal spinors of the anti-self-dual Taub-NUT metric. This quadric is not holomorphic with respect to the twistor space's complex structure, but one can ask for the subvariety where it accidentally is holomorphic, that is, where both the quadric equation and its non-holomorphic derivative vanish simultaneously. Naively, imposing two independent conditions in a three-complex-dimensional space should yield a one-complex-dimensional locus. Instead, the interplay between the self-dual and anti-self-dual Taub-NUT structures collapses the two conditions into one, and the resulting coincidence locus has complex dimension two, that is, real dimension four. This four-real-dimensional subvariety inherits a complex structure from the ambient twistor space and a symplectic form from the quadric itself. The paper shows these two structures are compatible, defining a Kahler metric on the coincidence locus. That Kahler metric is conformal to the Schwarzschild metric in Kerr-Schild form, with conformal factor one over r. By a theorem of Derdzinski, the fact that the scalar curvature of the Kahler metric is non-constant and satisfies a specific Laplacian identity guarantees that the conformally rescaled metric automatically solves the vacuum Einstein equations. The Schwarzschild metric emerges without ever imposing Einstein's equations directly; they are satisfied as a consequence of the holomorphic twistor data. The construction works in both Euclidean and Lorentzian signature, meaning the physical Schwarzschild black hole is recovered.

Core claim

The central discovery is a dimensional coincidence: when the anti-self-dual Taub-NUT quadric is placed inside the twistor space of self-dual Taub-NUT, the locus where the quadric becomes holomorphic has complex dimension two rather than the expected one. This happens because the Killing spinor structure of anti-self-dual Taub-NUT causes the holomorphicity condition to reduce from a genuinely independent equation to a consequence of the quadric equation itself. The resulting two-complex-dimensional coincidence locus inherits a Kahler structure, and the Kahler metric is conformal to Schwarzschild, with the conformal factor fixed by the scalar curvature via Derdzinski's theorem. This is the rst

What carries the argument

Twistor space of self-dual Taub-NUT in Kerr-Schild gauge; anti-self-dual Taub-NUT quadric defined by principal spinors; coincidence locus chi defined by Q=0 and nabla Q=0; Derdzinski's theorem relating extremal Kahler metrics to conformally Einstein metrics

Load-bearing premise

The dimensional coincidence that makes the construction work, where two conditions collapse to one and yield a four-real-dimensional locus, depends on a specific algebraic identity between the principal spinors of self-dual and anti-self-dual Taub-NUT. Whether this identity is a special feature of the Taub-NUT system or a pattern that generalizes to other metric pairs is not established.

What would settle it

A direct computation verifying that the coincidence locus has complex dimension two rather than one, and that the inherited Kahler metric equals r^{-2} times the Schwarzschild metric in Kerr-Schild form. The load-bearing algebraic step is the identity showing that the holomorphicity condition reduces to a single equation rather than two independent ones.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the coincidence-locus construction generalizes to Kerr, twistor theory could provide a non-perturbative description of rotating black holes, potentially enabling exact graviton scattering calculations on Kerr backgrounds
  • The embedding of Schwarzschild inside the twistor space of self-dual Taub-NUT suggests that exact wavefunctions and scattering amplitudes known on self-dual Taub-NUT could induce structures encoding perturbation theory on Schwarzschild
  • If other type-D vacuum metrics correspond to analogous subvarieties of curved twistor spaces, the googly problem could be solved systematically for an entire class of astrophysically relevant black holes
  • The construction provides a new geometric route from Euclidean gravitational instantons to Lorentzian black hole metrics, mediated entirely by holomorphic data

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents a twistor-theoretic construction of the Schwarzschild metric, framed as a resolution of the googly problem for this specific solution. The authors start with the twistor space (PT, ∇) of self-dual Taub-NUT (SDTN) in Kerr-Schild form, and consider within it the quadric Q defined by the principal spinors of anti-self-dual Taub-NUT (ASDTN). Although Q is not holomorphic in the complex structure of PT, its holomorphic locus — the 'coincidence locus' χ = {Q = 0 = ∇Q} — is shown to have complex dimension 2 (rather than the naively expected 1). The locus χ inherits a complex structure J from PT and a symplectic form ω from the quadric, and the paper claims these are compatible (ω(J,J) = ω), yielding a Kähler metric g_K that is conformal to Schwarzschild. The Einstein condition is then verified via Derdzinski's theorem. The construction is parameter-free (the only parameter is the physical mass M), uses only holomorphic twistor data, and does not explicitly solve the Einstein equations.

Significance. This is a conceptually significant result. If correct, it provides the first instance of a non-self-dual Einstein metric constructed entirely from holomorphic data in a single twistor space, addressing the googly problem in a concrete setting. The construction is parameter-free: no constants are fitted, and the mass M enters as a known physical parameter of the Taub-NUT metrics. The logical chain is explicit and checkable: the dimensional calculation (§3.1), the complex structure (§3.2), the metric extraction (§3.3), and the Einstein condition (§3.4) each proceed through defined algebraic steps. The paper also offers a clear physical motivation (Hawking's picture of Schwarzschild as a superposition of SD and ASD Taub-NUT) and a well-articulated set of criteria for what constitutes a googly resolution. The falsifiable prediction — that g_K is conformal to Schwarzschild with conformal factor r^{-2} — is verified explicitly in Eq. (3.20).

major comments (2)
  1. §3.3, Eq. (3.18): The compatibility condition ω(J,J) = ω is the single load-bearing step that elevates the construction from 'complex structure + symplectic form on χ' to a genuine Kähler metric. The paper states 'a simple calculation shows that ω(J,J) = ω' without displaying any intermediate steps. Footnote 6 confirms this relies on the proportionality  ∝ B (from Eq. 3.11), but the reader cannot verify the claim without working through the full substitution of J (Eq. 3.17) and ω (Eq. 2.32) into the compatibility condition. Given that the entire construction — the existence of the Kähler metric g_K, its identification with Schwarzschild, and the applicability of Derdzinski's theorem — depends on this identity, the authors should either provide an explicit computation or, at minimum, a detailed sketch showing the key cancellations. This is not a presentation issue; it is the central step
  2. §3.4, Eq. (3.28): The computation ΔΩ = 1/6 is stated as the result of 'an explicit computation' but the calculation itself is not shown. While this step is secondary (it confirms the Einstein condition via Derdzinski's theorem, which is already known to hold for Schwarzschild), it is part of the logical chain establishing that the conformal factor r^{-1} is canonical rather than coincidental. A brief indication of the intermediate steps — or at least a statement of what quantities enter the Laplacian computation — would strengthen the argument.
minor comments (5)
  1. Eq. (2.12): The identity ζ+ + ζ̄- = -1 is used critically in Eq. (3.11) to establish ⟨B Â⟩ = 0. While the identity is stated, a one-line derivation or reference to where it is proven would help the reader.
  2. §3.1, Eqs. (3.3)–(3.8): The reduction from ∇Q = 0 to ⟨Aλ⟩ = 0 proceeds through several steps involving the Killing spinor equation. The logic is sound but dense; a brief signpost sentence summarizing the strategy before diving into the calculation would aid readability.
  3. The paper relies on several self-citations ([69], [67], [68]) for constructions that are load-bearing for the present argument (the googly quadric procedure, the Kerr-Schild form of SDTN, the superposition prescription). While these are recent and related works by the authors, a brief recapitulation of the key results needed from each would make the paper more self-contained.
  4. §3.3, final paragraph of the section: The notation Âα (the conjugate of Aα under the antipodal map) is introduced implicitly through Eq. (3.11). Making the definition explicit when Âα is first defined would improve clarity.
  5. The abstract states the construction gives a metric 'conformal to Schwarzschild (in Lorentzian or Euclidean signature).' The body (§3.3, after Eq. 3.21) clarifies that the construction inputs are Euclidean but the output admits either reality structure. This subtlety could be flagged in the abstract for precision.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful and constructive report. Both major comments request additional computational detail at two key steps of the argument; we agree that these should be expanded in the revised manuscript and will do so.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §3.3, Eq. (3.18): The compatibility condition ω(J,J) = ω is stated as 'a simple calculation' without intermediate steps. The referee requests an explicit computation or detailed sketch showing the key cancellations, noting this is the central load-bearing step.

    Authors: We agree entirely. The compatibility condition ω(J,J) = ω is the single step that elevates the construction from a complex structure plus a symplectic form to a genuine Kähler metric, and the reader should be able to verify it without reconstructing the calculation from scratch. In the revised manuscript, we will expand the discussion around Eq. (3.18) to include an explicit computation. Specifically, we will show the substitution of the complex structure J (Eq. 3.17) and the symplectic form ω (Eq. 2.32) into the compatibility condition, making clear how the proportionality  ∝ B (Eq. 3.11) enters and drives the key cancellations. We will display the intermediate expression before simplification and indicate which identities — principally (2.12), (2.26), and (3.11) — are used at each step to arrive at the result. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §3.4, Eq. (3.28): The computation ΔΩ = 1/6 is stated as the result of 'an explicit computation' but the calculation is not shown. The referee requests a brief indication of intermediate steps or at least a statement of what quantities enter the Laplacian computation.

    Authors: We agree that this step, while secondary to the main result, is part of the logical chain establishing that the conformal factor r^{-1} is canonical rather than coincidental, and it should be more transparent. In the revised manuscript, we will expand the discussion around Eq. (3.28) to indicate the key ingredients entering the Laplacian computation. In particular, we will state explicitly how the Kähler metric g_K (Eq. 3.19) and its inverse — equivalently, the Poisson bi-vector ω^{-1} (Eq. 3.26) — enter the Laplacian Δ = g_K^{ab} ∇_a ∇_b, and we will sketch the main steps by which the determinant and its inverse are evaluated using the identities (2.12) and (2.26), leading to the result ΔΩ = 1/6. We will also note that the computation is most transparently performed in the (r, θ, φ, τ) coordinate system adapted to the Kerr-Schild form, where the radial dependence of Ω = r^{-1} is direct. revision: yes

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the construction is parameter-free and the Schwarzschild metric emerges from explicit algebraic computation, not from a fit or self-definitional loop.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Section 2.2, eq. (2.27)-(2.32), citing [69]; and Section 3.1, eq. (3.1)-(3.9)]
    "However, there is another construction of ASDTN which is distinct from the usual non-linear graviton and is formulated entirely in PT, rather than its dual [69]. This exploits the fact that ASDTN has special geometric structures beyond being (anti-)hyperkähler – it is also algebraically special of Petrov type D."

    The twistor quadric construction of ASDTN (ref [69], by overlapping authors Adamo-Araneda-Seet) is a load-bearing input: it defines Q, the symplectic form ω (eq. 2.32), and the principal spinors A,B that feed the entire coincidence locus construction. However, this citation is not circular in the sense of reducing to the present paper's output. Reference [69] constructs ASDTN from a quadric in flat twistor space — an independent result with its own inputs (flat twistor space, Killing spinor of ASDTN). The present paper uses that construction as a building block inside the curved SDTN twistor space. The cited work does not assume the Schwarzschild result; it is a genuinely prior, independent construction. This is normal self-citation of prior work, not a circularity. The only concern is a '

  2. self citation load bearing [Section 3.3, eq. (3.18) and footnote 6]
    "Remarkably, a simple calculation shows that ω(J, J) = ω, so the complex and symplectic structures on χ are compatible. [...] This compatibility relies on the fact that  ∝ B, following from (3.11)."

    The Kähler compatibility ω(J,J)=ω (eq. 3.18) is the single most load-bearing step: without it, g_K is not a symmetric metric and the Schwarzschild identification is vacuous. The paper states this as 'a simple calculation' without displaying it, and footnote 6 confirms it 'relies on the fact that  ∝ B, following from (3.11).' The identity (3.11) itself follows from ζ+ + ζ̄- = -1 (eq. 2.12), which is a property of the Taub-NUT coordinate system. This is a gap in verification, not a circularity: the inputs (SDTN/ASDTN spinor data) are not defined in terms of the output (Schwarzschild metric). The calculation, if correct, is a genuine algebraic identity. But the unstated calculation is the weakest link in the chain.

  3. renaming known result [Section 3.4, eq. (3.20)-(3.21) and Theorem 1]
    "upon using the identities (2.12) and (2.26), gK can be expressed as gK = 1/r² gS, where gS := δ + 4M/r ℓ^{α̇α} ℓ^{β̇β} dx_{α̇α} dx_{β̇β} is the Schwarzschild metric in Kerr-Schild coordinates [82, 83]."

    The final identification g_K = r^{-2} g_S is an explicit algebraic substitution: the Kähler metric g_K (eq. 3.19) is written in terms of the SDTN/ASDTN principal spinors A, B, and the identities (2.12), (2.26) are used to rewrite it as the known Kerr-Schild form of Schwarzschild. This is not circular: the inputs are the Taub-NUT spinor structures, and the output (Schwarzschild) is a different metric obtained by algebraic rearrangement. The conformal factor r^{-1} is then independently justified by Derdzinski's theorem (Theorem 2, ref [84] by a different author), which is an external mathematical result. No parameter is fitted; no output is fed back as input.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is substantially self-contained and parameter-free. The inputs are the SDTN and ASDTN metrics in Kerr-Schild form (known solutions with known mass parameter M), and the output is the Schwarzschild metric. No constants are fitted to data and then 'predicted.' The self-citations ([69] for the quadric construction, [53] for scattering on SDTN) are to prior independent work that does not assume the Schwarzschild result. The Kähler compatibility ω(J,J)=ω (eq. 3.18) is stated as a 'simple calculation' without being displayed — this is a verification gap, but it is not circular: the identity depends on algebraic properties of the Taub-NUT spinors (eq. 3.11, ultimately ζ+ + ζ̄- = -1 from eq. 2.12), not on the Schwarzschild metric itself. The final identification with Schwarzschild (eq. 3.20) is an explicit algebraic substitution, and the Einstein condition is confirmed via Derdzinski's theorem (an external result by a different author, ref [84]). The only mild concern is that the load-bearing identity (3.11) and the compatibility (3.18) are Taub-NUT-specific and their verification is not shown, but this is a correctness/completeness risk rather than circularity. Score 2 reflects the presence of load-bearing self-citations that are independent but not externally machine-checked, combined with a central derivation that has genuine independent content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

The construction is remarkably parsimonious: no free parameters are introduced (M is inherited from the physical Taub-NUT metrics), no new entities are postulated without independent evidence, and the key theorems (non-linear graviton, Derdzinski) are external mathematical results. The main domain-specific assumptions (eq. 2.26, 2.12) are inherited from prior work [69] and are specific to the Taub-NUT system.

free parameters (1)
  • M (mass)
    The mass parameter M enters as a physical parameter of the Taub-NUT metrics and is not fitted to data in this paper. It is an input from the prior literature, not a free parameter introduced ad hoc.
axioms (4)
  • standard math Non-linear graviton construction (Penrose 1976): integrable complex structure deformations of twistor space preserving the fiberwise symplectic structure correspond to self-dual vacuum metrics.
    Invoked in §2.1 to construct the twistor space of SDTN. This is a foundational theorem of twistor theory.
  • standard math Derdzinski's theorem (Proposition 4 in [84]): an extremal Kähler metric with non-constant scalar curvature satisfying eq. 3.22 is conformal to an Einstein metric with conformal factor given by the inverse scalar curvature.
    Invoked in §3.4 to establish that the Kähler metric on the coincidence locus is conformal to a vacuum Einstein metric. This is an external mathematical theorem.
  • domain assumption The principal spinors of ASDTN in Kerr-Schild form are related to those of SDTN by A^α = √2 T^{αȧ} α_ȧ, B^α = √2 T^{αȧ} β_ȧ (eq. 2.26).
    This relationship, established in [69], is load-bearing: it enables the key identity ⟨B Â⟩=0 (eq. 3.11) which forces the coincidence locus to have dimension 2 and ensures Kähler compatibility.
  • domain assumption The identity ζ+ + ζ̄- = -1 (eq. 2.12), relating the principal spinor parameters of SDTN.
    Used in the proof of ⟨B Â⟩=0 (eq. 3.11). This is specific to the Taub-NUT geometry in Kerr-Schild coordinates.
invented entities (1)
  • Coincidence locus χ independent evidence
    purpose: The holomorphic subvariety of the SDTN twistor space where the ASDTN quadric Q is also holomorphic; serves as the base for the Kähler metric that is conformal to Schwarzschild.
    The coincidence locus is defined by explicit equations (Q=0=∇Q, eq. 3.2) and its properties (dimension, complex structure, Kähler metric) are derived, not postulated. The resulting metric is independently verified to be Schwarzschild.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-glm · 21345 in / 2469 out tokens · 548144 ms · 2026-07-08T12:26:14.428405+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Twistor theory forms the basis for many surprising advances in areas ranging from dynamical systems to quantum field theory. Yet for almost fifty years, one of the main drawbacks of twistor theory has been its inability to give non-perturbative descriptions of non-chiral (or non-self-dual) field configurations. This difficulty is known as 'the googly problem.' In this paper, we provide a resolution of the googly problem for a particular solution of the vacuum Einstein equations: the Schwarzschild metric. We start with the twistor space of the self-dual Taub-NUT Euclidean gravitational instanton, expressed in Kerr-Schild form. Within this twistor space, we then consider a quadric which corresponds to the anti-self-dual Taub-NUT metric. While the full quadric is not holomorphic with respect to the complex structure of the self-dual Taub-NUT twistor space, its holomorphic locus still has complex dimension two. This 'coincidence locus' -- points in twistor space on the holomorphic portion of the quadric -- inherits a complex structure from the twistor space and a K\"ahler form from the quadric itself. Remarkably, these structures are compatible, giving rise to a non-self-dual, four-dimensional K\"ahler metric which is conformal to Schwarzschild (in Lorentzian or Euclidean signature). This is the first instance of a non-self-dual Einstein metric constructed entirely from holomorphic data in a twistor space.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 92 canonical work pages · 45 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Penrose,Twistor algebra,J

    R. Penrose,Twistor algebra,J. Math. Phys.8(1967) 345

    work page 1967

  2. [2]

    Penrose and M.A.H

    R. Penrose and M.A.H. MacCallum,Twistor theory: An Approach to the quantization of fields and space-time,Phys. Rept.6(1972) 241

    work page 1972

  3. [3]

    Penrose,Solutions of the zero-rest-mass equations,J

    R. Penrose,Solutions of the zero-rest-mass equations,J. Math. Phys.10(1969) 38

    work page 1969

  4. [4]

    Ward,On Selfdual gauge fields,Phys

    R.S. Ward,On Selfdual gauge fields,Phys. Lett. A61(1977) 81

    work page 1977

  5. [5]

    Penrose,Nonlinear Gravitons and Curved Twistor Theory,Gen

    R. Penrose,Nonlinear Gravitons and Curved Twistor Theory,Gen. Rel. Grav.7(1976) 31

    work page 1976

  6. [6]

    Belavin and V.E

    A.A. Belavin and V.E. Zakharov,Yang-Mills Equations as Inverse Scattering Problem,Phys. Lett. B73(1978) 53

    work page 1978

  7. [7]

    Boyer and J.F

    C.P. Boyer and J.F. Plebanski,An infinite hierarchy of conservation laws and nonlinear superposition principles for selfdual Einstein spaces,J. Math. Phys.26(1985) 229

    work page 1985

  8. [8]

    Ward,Integrable and solvable systems, and relations among them,Phil

    R.S. Ward,Integrable and solvable systems, and relations among them,Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A315(1985) 451

    work page 1985

  9. [9]

    Mason and N.M.J

    L.J. Mason and N.M.J. Woodhouse,Integrability, selfduality, and twistor theory, Oxford University Press (1991)

    work page 1991

  10. [10]

    Hitchin,On the Construction of Monopoles,Commun

    N.J. Hitchin,On the Construction of Monopoles,Commun. Math. Phys.89(1983) 145

    work page 1983

  11. [11]

    Hitchin,The Selfduality equations on a Riemann surface,Proc

    N.J. Hitchin,The Selfduality equations on a Riemann surface,Proc. Lond. Math. Soc.55 (1987) 59

    work page 1987

  12. [12]

    Mason and G.A.J

    L.J. Mason and G.A.J. Sparling,Nonlinear Schrodinger and Korteweg-de Vries Are Reductions of Selfdual Yang-Mills,Phys. Lett. A137(1989) 29

    work page 1989

  13. [13]

    Mason and G.A.J

    L.J. Mason and G.A.J. Sparling,Twistor correspondences for the soliton hierarchies,J. Geom. Phys.8(1992) 243

    work page 1992

  14. [14]

    Strachan,The Moyal algebra and integrable deformations of the selfdual Einstein equations,Phys

    I.A.B. Strachan,The Moyal algebra and integrable deformations of the selfdual Einstein equations,Phys. Lett. B283(1992) 63. – 16 –

    work page 1992

  15. [15]

    Penrose,Twistor quantization and curved space-time,Int

    R. Penrose,Twistor quantization and curved space-time,Int. J. Theor. Phys.1(1968) 61

    work page 1968

  16. [16]

    Penrose,The Central programme of twistor theory,Chaos Solitons Fractals10(1999) 581

    R. Penrose,The Central programme of twistor theory,Chaos Solitons Fractals10(1999) 581

    work page 1999

  17. [17]

    Penrose,Twistor theory and the Einstein vacuum,Class

    R. Penrose,Twistor theory and the Einstein vacuum,Class. Quant. Grav.16(1999) A113

    work page 1999

  18. [18]

    Penrose,Palatial twistor theory and the twistor googly problem,Phil

    R. Penrose,Palatial twistor theory and the twistor googly problem,Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A373(2015) 20140237

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    Gluing Noncommutative Twistor Spaces

    M. Marcolli and R. Penrose,Gluing Non-commutative Twistor Spaces,Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser.72(2021) 417 [2012.02823]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    Perturbative Gauge Theory As A String Theory In Twistor Space

    E. Witten,Perturbative gauge theory as a string theory in twistor space,Commun. Math. Phys.252(2004) 189 [hep-th/0312171]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  21. [21]

    Twistor actions for non-self-dual fields; a new foundation for twistor-string theory

    L.J. Mason,Twistor actions for non-self-dual fields: A Derivation of twistor-string theory, JHEP10(2005) 009 [hep-th/0507269]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  22. [22]

    Twistor Strings for N=8 Supergravity

    D. Skinner,Twistor strings forN= 8 supergravity,JHEP04(2020) 047 [1301.0868]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  23. [23]

    Twistor action for general relativity

    A. Sharma,Twistor action for general relativity,2104.07031

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    The self-dual sector of QCD amplitudes

    G. Chalmers and W. Siegel,The Selfdual sector of QCD amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 7628 [hep-th/9606061]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  25. [25]

    Plebanski,On the separation of Einsteinian substructures,J

    J.F. Plebanski,On the separation of Einsteinian substructures,J. Math. Phys.18(1977) 2511

    work page 1977

  26. [26]

    On the Tree-Level S-Matrix of Yang-Mills Theory

    R. Roiban, M. Spradlin and A. Volovich,On the tree level S matrix of Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 026009 [hep-th/0403190]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  27. [27]

    Gravity from Rational Curves

    F. Cachazo and D. Skinner,Gravity from Rational Curves in Twistor Space,Phys. Rev. Lett. 110(2013) 161301 [1207.0741]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  28. [28]

    The Complete Planar S-matrix of N=4 SYM as a Wilson Loop in Twistor Space

    L.J. Mason and D. Skinner,The Complete Planar S-matrix of N=4 SYM as a Wilson Loop in Twistor Space,JHEP12(2010) 018 [1009.2225]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  29. [29]

    Holomorphic Linking, Loop Equations and Scattering Amplitudes in Twistor Space

    M. Bullimore and D. Skinner,Holomorphic Linking, Loop Equations and Scattering Amplitudes in Twistor Space,1101.1329

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    A Proof of the Supersymmetric Correlation Function / Wilson Loop Correspondence

    T. Adamo, M. Bullimore, L. Mason and D. Skinner,A Proof of the Supersymmetric Correlation Function / Wilson Loop Correspondence,JHEP08(2011) 076 [1103.4119]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  31. [31]

    Correlation functions, null polygonal Wilson loops, and local operators

    T. Adamo,Correlation functions, null polygonal Wilson loops, and local operators,JHEP12 (2011) 006 [1110.3925]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  32. [32]

    Composite Operators in the Twistor Formulation of $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM Theory

    L. Koster, V. Mitev, M. Staudacher and M. Wilhelm,Composite Operators in the Twistor Formulation of N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 011601 [1603.04471]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    Bootstrapping two-loop QCD amplitudes

    K.J. Costello,Bootstrapping two-loop QCD amplitudes,JHEP08(2025) 011 [2302.00770]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    On gauge amplitudes first appearing at two loops

    L.J. Dixon and A. Morales,On gauge amplitudes first appearing at two loops,JHEP08 (2024) 129 [2407.13967]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Rational QCD loop amplitudes and quantum theories on twistor space

    L.J. Dixon and A. Morales,Rational QCD loop amplitudes and quantum theories on twistor space,JHEP03(2025) 188 [2411.10967]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Morales,Two-loop QCD amplitudes from the chiral algebra bootstrap,Phys

    A. Morales,Two-loop QCD amplitudes from the chiral algebra bootstrap,Phys. Rev. D113 (2026) 105017 [2510.20156]

    work page arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    The One-Loop QCD $\beta$-Function as an Index

    R. Bittleston and K. Costello,One-Loop QCDβFunction as an Index,Phys. Rev. Lett.136 – 17 – (2026) 211601 [2510.26764]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    Top-down holography in an asymptotically flat spacetime

    K. Costello, N.M. Paquette and A. Sharma,Top-Down Holography in an Asymptotically Flat Spacetime,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 061602 [2208.14233]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    Burns space and holography

    K. Costello, N.M. Paquette and A. Sharma,Burns space and holography,JHEP10(2023) 174 [2306.00940]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    Self-Dual Gauge Theory from the Top Down

    R. Bittleston, K. Costello and K. Zeng,Self-dual Gauge Theory from the Top Down, Commun. Math. Phys.407(2026) 108 [2412.02680]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  41. [41]

    Complex hyperk\"ahler structures defined by Donaldson-Thomas invariants

    T. Bridgeland and I.A.B. Strachan,Complex hyperkähler structures defined by Donaldson–Thomas invariants,Lett. Math. Phys.111(2021) 54 [2006.13059]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    Joyce structures and their twistor spaces

    T. Bridgeland,Joyce structures and their twistor spaces,Adv. Math.462(2025) 110089 [2407.18229]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Heavenly metrics, hyper-Lagrangians and Joyce structures

    M. Dunajski and T. Moy,Heavenly metrics, hyper-Lagrangians and Joyce structures,J. Lond. Math. Soc.110(2024) e13009 [2402.14352]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Twistors, the ASD Yang-Mills equations, and 4d Chern-Simons theory

    R. Bittleston and D. Skinner,Twistors, the ASD Yang-Mills equations and 4d Chern-Simons theory,JHEP02(2023) 227 [2011.04638]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    Twistor Actions for Integrable Systems

    R.F. Penna,Twistor Actions for Integrable Systems,JHEP09(2021) 140 [2011.05831]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    Integrable Deformations from Twistor Space

    L.T. Cole, R.A. Cullinan, B. Hoare, J. Liniado and D.C. Thompson,Integrable deformations from twistor space,SciPost Phys.17(2024) 008 [2311.17551]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Gauging The Diamond: Integrable Coset Models from Twistor Space

    L.T. Cole, R.A. Cullinan, B. Hoare, J. Liniado and D.C. Thompson,Gauging the diamond: integrable coset models from twistor space,JHEP12(2024) 202 [2407.09479]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Bittleston, L

    R. Bittleston, L. Mason and S.F. Moosavian,The Self-Duality Equations on a Riemann Surface and Four-Dimensional Chern-Simons Theory,2601.05309

    work page arXiv

  49. [49]

    The Yang-Baxter Sigma Model from Twistor Space

    M. Ashwinkumar and J. Pal,The Yang-Baxter Sigma Model from Twistor Space, 2602.11288

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    MHV scattering of gluons and gravitons in chiral strong fields

    T. Adamo, L. Mason and A. Sharma,MHV scattering of gluons and gravitons in chiral strong fields,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 041602 [2003.13501]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  51. [51]

    Twistor sigma models for quaternionic geometry and graviton scattering

    T. Adamo, L. Mason and A. Sharma,Twistor sigma models for quaternionic geometry and graviton scattering,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.27(2023) 623 [2103.16984]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    Graviton scattering in self-dual radiative space-times

    T. Adamo, L. Mason and A. Sharma,Graviton scattering in self-dual radiative space-times, Class. Quant. Grav.40(2023) 095002 [2203.02238]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    Graviton scattering on self-dual black holes

    T. Adamo, G. Bogna, L. Mason and A. Sharma,Graviton scattering on self-dual black holes, Class. Quant. Grav.43(2026) 055005 [2507.18605]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  54. [54]

    Isenberg, P.B

    J. Isenberg, P.B. Yasskin and P.S. Green,Nonselfdual Gauge Fields,Phys. Lett. B78(1978) 462

    work page 1978

  55. [55]

    LeBrun,Spaces of complex null geodesics in complex-Riemannian geometry,Trans

    C. LeBrun,Spaces of complex null geodesics in complex-Riemannian geometry,Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.278(1983) 209

    work page 1983

  56. [56]

    Witten,Twistor - Like Transform in Ten-Dimensions,Nucl

    E. Witten,Twistor - Like Transform in Ten-Dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B266(1986) 245

    work page 1986

  57. [57]

    Baston and L.J

    R.J. Baston and L.J. Mason,Conformal Gravity, the Einstein Equations and Spaces of Complex Null Geodesics,Class. Quant. Grav.4(1987) 815

    work page 1987

  58. [58]

    LeBrun,Thickenings and conformal gravity,Commun

    C. LeBrun,Thickenings and conformal gravity,Commun. Math. Phys.139(1991) 1. – 18 –

    work page 1991

  59. [59]

    Ambitwistor strings and the scattering equations

    L. Mason and D. Skinner,Ambitwistor strings and the scattering equations,JHEP07(2014) 048 [1311.2564]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  60. [60]

    A Worldsheet Theory for Supergravity

    T. Adamo, E. Casali and D. Skinner,A Worldsheet Theory for Supergravity,JHEP02 (2015) 116 [1409.5656]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  61. [61]

    Flaherty,An integrable structure for type D spacetimes,Phys

    E.J. Flaherty,An integrable structure for type D spacetimes,Phys. Lett. A46(1974) 391

    work page 1974

  62. [62]

    Flaherty,Hermitian and Kählerian Geometry in Relativity, vol

    E.J. Flaherty,Hermitian and Kählerian Geometry in Relativity, vol. 46 ofLecture Notes in Physics, Springer-Verlag (1976), 10.1007/3-540-07540-2

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-07540-2 1976

  63. [63]

    Kaehler geometry of black holes and gravitational instantons

    S. Aksteiner and B. Araneda,Kähler Geometry of Black Holes and Gravitational Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 161502 [2207.10039]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  64. [64]

    Pontecorvo,On twistor spaces of anti-self-dual Hermitian surfaces,Trans

    M. Pontecorvo,On twistor spaces of anti-self-dual Hermitian surfaces,Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.331(1992) 653

    work page 1992

  65. [65]

    Twistor quadrics and black holes

    B. Araneda,Twistor quadrics and black holes,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 044040 [2212.10491]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Hawking,Gravitational Instantons,Phys

    S.W. Hawking,Gravitational Instantons,Phys. Lett. A60(1977) 81

    work page 1977

  67. [67]

    Newman-Janis Algorithm from Taub-NUT Instantons

    J.-H. Kim,Newman-Janis Algorithm from Taub-Newman-Unti-Tamburino Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026) 231401 [2412.19611]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  68. [68]

    Single Kerr-Schild Metric for Taub-NUT Instanton

    J.-H. Kim,Single Kerr-Schild metric for Taub-NUT instanton,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) L021703 [2405.09518]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    Adamo, B

    T. Adamo, B. Araneda and S. Seet,The dual twistor theory of self-dual black holes, 2601.05037

    work page arXiv

  70. [70]

    Sparling,The non-linear graviton representing the analogue of the Schwarzschild or Kerr black hole,Twistor Newsletter1(1976) 14

    G.A.J. Sparling,The non-linear graviton representing the analogue of the Schwarzschild or Kerr black hole,Twistor Newsletter1(1976) 14

    work page 1976

  71. [71]

    Hitchin,Polygons and gravitons,Math

    N.J. Hitchin,Polygons and gravitons,Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc.85(1979) 465

    work page 1979

  72. [72]

    LeBrun,Complete Ricci-flat Kähler metrics onCn need not be flat, inProc

    C. LeBrun,Complete Ricci-flat Kähler metrics onCn need not be flat, inProc. Symp. Pure Math, vol. 52, pp. 297–304, 1991

    work page 1991

  73. [73]

    Gibbons and S.W

    G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking,Gravitational Multi-Instantons,Phys. Lett. B78(1978) 430

    work page 1978

  74. [74]

    Gibbons and S.W

    G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking,Classification of Gravitational Instanton Symmetries, Commun. Math. Phys.66(1979) 291

    work page 1979

  75. [75]

    Lectures on twistor theory

    T. Adamo,Lectures on twistor theory,PoSModave2017(2018) 003 [1712.02196]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  76. [76]

    Atiyah, N.J

    M.F. Atiyah, N.J. Hitchin and I.M. Singer,Selfduality in Four-Dimensional Riemannian Geometry,Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A362(1978) 425

    work page 1978

  77. [77]

    Woodhouse,Real methods in twistor theory,Class

    N.M.J. Woodhouse,Real methods in twistor theory,Class. Quant. Grav.2(1985) 257

    work page 1985

  78. [78]

    Gindikin,A construction of hyper-Kahler metrics,Funct

    S.G. Gindikin,A construction of hyper-Kahler metrics,Funct. Anal. Appl.20(1986) 238

    work page 1986

  79. [79]

    Eastwood, R

    M.G. Eastwood, R. Penrose and R.O. Wells,Cohomology and Massless Fields,Commun. Math. Phys.78(1981) 305

    work page 1981

  80. [80]

    Tod,Self-dual Kerr–Schild metrics and null Maxwell fields,J

    K.P. Tod,Self-dual Kerr–Schild metrics and null Maxwell fields,J. Math. Phys.23(1982) 1147

    work page 1982

Showing first 80 references.