Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 2 cited by

Monitored Clifford circuits purify by an exactly solvable death process on stabilizer rank, giving universal entropy curves without the replica trick.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-10 23:27 UTC pith:YXFQGYLP

load-bearing objection Exact, replica-free solution for Clifford purification via a pure-death process on stabilizer rank, with clean closed forms and parameter-free numerics that cleanly separate Clifford from Haar classes.

arxiv 2607.06683 v1 pith:YXFQGYLP submitted 2026-07-07 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mech

Universal purification dynamics of monitored Clifford circuits

Beatrice Magni , Federico Gerbino , Xhek Turkeshi , Andrea De Luca This is my paper
classification quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords monitored quantum circuitsClifford circuitspurification dynamicsstabilizer rankmeasurement-induced phase transitionpure-death processRényi entropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Under weak monitoring, quantum circuits purify on a timescale that grows exponentially with system size. That slowness is expected to make the late dynamics universal, but previous calculations relied on the replica trick and a delicate analytic continuation. This paper shows that for Clifford circuits on prime-dimensional qudits the problem collapses further: the density matrix is always a flat projector, so purification is just the decay of a single integer, the stabilizer rank. In the scaling limit the rank follows a pure-death Markov process that starts from infinity, and every Rényi entropy is simply the mean rank of that process. The authors give closed-form scaling functions for the entropy and purity, confirm them with exact stabilizer simulations for both global and local circuits, and show that the replica moments are only a tilted version of the same process. Because the rank is quantized, two signatures appear that generic circuits lack: entropy fluctuations remain O(1) even at early scaled times, and observables oscillate periodically in the logarithm of scaled time.

Core claim

In the scaling limit at fixed x = t / T_P(L), purification of monitored Clifford circuits on L qudits of prime dimension q reduces exactly to the continuous-time pure-death process on the stabilizer rank R(x) with rates γ_r = q^r − q^{−r}. Consequently all Rényi entropies coincide with the mean rank ⟨S(x)⟩ = E[R(x)], whose full distribution and moments are obtained in closed form from the Laplace transform of the master equation.

What carries the argument

The continuous-time pure-death process on the non-negative integers with rates γ_r = q^r − q^{−r}, descending from infinity; its waiting-time and first-passage representation supplies the Laplace transform of the rank distribution and thereby every universal scaling function.

Load-bearing premise

Between informative measurements the unitary evolution is assumed to scramble the state completely, so that the next measured Pauli is effectively a uniform random non-identity string (or that the same rates emerge after a single non-universal time rescaling for local circuits).

What would settle it

Exact stabilizer simulations of global Clifford circuits at q = 2, 3 or 5 with system sizes large enough that the entrance regime is resolved should either collapse onto the predicted parameter-free curves for ⟨S(x)⟩ and 1 − ⟨P(x)⟩ or show systematic deviations that cannot be absorbed into a single T_P.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper shows that, for monitored Clifford circuits on L qudits of prime dimension q, the slow purification dynamics in the volume-law phase reduces exactly, in the scaling limit x = t/T_P(L), to a continuous-time pure-death Markov process on the stabilizer rank R(x) with rates γ_r = q^r - q^{-r}. Because mixed stabilizer states are flat projectors, all Rényi entropies coincide with the mean rank ⟨S(x)⟩ = E[R(x)], whose full distribution is obtained from the Laplace transform of the master equation; closed-form small-x and large-x expansions, purity moments, and a Feynman–Kac tilt that recovers the replica problem are derived. Exact stabilizer simulations for q = 2, 3, 5 confirm the global model with no free parameters and local brick-wall circuits after a single non-universal T_P extraction. Rank quantization produces two Clifford-specific hallmarks (O(1) entropy-variance saturation and log_q-periodic modulation) invisible to integer-moment replicas.

Significance. If correct, the work supplies the first fully non-perturbative, replica-free solution of universal purification for an entire class of monitored circuits that are both efficiently simulable and experimentally relevant. The derivation is parameter-free for the global model, the scaling functions are compact and falsifiable, and the two hallmarks cleanly separate Clifford from Haar-unitary/orthogonal classes. The exact match between the tilted death process and the Clifford commutant further anchors the result in the algebraic structure of the group. These strengths make the manuscript a substantial advance for the theory of measurement-induced criticality and for the design of purification-based diagnostics on near-term hardware.

minor comments (4)
  1. In the small-x expansion (15) and End Matter G, the amplitude of the log-periodic modulation ϕ is stated to be ~10^{-6} for q=2; a short numerical table of peak-to-peak amplitudes for q=2,3,5 would help readers assess experimental visibility.
  2. Figure 1(c) caption: the reference crossing value ⟨S⟩_ref = 3/2 is given, but the corresponding x_0 ≈ 0.45 is only approximate; stating the precise numerical value used for each protocol would improve reproducibility.
  3. End Matter A, Eq. (21): the three class probabilities are written with denominators q^{2L}-1; a parenthetical remark that the continuum limit discards the -1 consistently with (7) would avoid a minor notational inconsistency.
  4. The Supplemental Material derives the Mellin-transform representation of the Fourier modes; a one-sentence pointer in the main text (near Eq. (39)) would make the origin of the Γ(2πim/ln q) coefficients more transparent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: death-process rates follow from symplectic cardinalities, scaling functions from the master equation, and T_P is a single non-universal scale for collapse.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. Stabilizer mixed states have flat spectrum of rank q^r so all Rényi entropies equal r by definition (Eq. 4). The global model maps measurements to a pure-death chain on r via the three classes of Pauli strings relative to W and W^perp; the drop probability p_L(r) is exactly the cardinality ratio (Eq. 6), which becomes rates gamma_r = q^r - q^{-r} after rescaling by T_P = q^L. The continuum master equation (8), its Laplace transform (9), the moment hierarchy (11), small-x and large-x expansions, the O(1) variance saturation (36), and the log_q-periodic modulation (39) are all obtained by solving this Markov process with no free parameters. For local brick-wall circuits the single non-universal scale T_P(L) is fixed by one crossing condition and the entire curve is then predicted; this is ordinary scaling collapse, not a fit of the functional form. The replica tilt (Feynman-Kac) is an independent consistency check against the Clifford commutant. Self-citations to the authors' prior unitary/orthogonal works supply only the comparison class, not any load-bearing uniqueness or ansatz for the Clifford rates themselves. The construction therefore does not reduce to its inputs by definition or by fitted prediction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard symplectic geometry of the Clifford group, the definition of mixed stabilizer states, and the assumption that weak monitoring plus full scrambling reduces the dynamics to a rank process. No new particles or forces are introduced. The only free parameter is the non-universal purification time T_P(L) for local circuits; the global model is parameter-free. All scaling functions follow from the master equation once the rates γ_r are fixed by cardinalities.

free parameters (1)
  • T_P(L) for local brick-wall circuits
    Extracted for each protocol and size by a single crossing condition ⟨S(x0 T_P,L)⟩=⟨S(x0)⟩; used only to rescale the time axis. Global model has T_P=q^L exactly, no fit.
axioms (4)
  • standard math Clifford group acts as the full symplectic group Sp(2L,F_q) on Pauli strings; mixed stabilizer states are projectors onto codespaces of isotropic subspaces.
    Standard stabilizer formalism (Gottesman, Aaronson–Gottesman); used throughout to identify rank with the number of unconstrained generators.
  • domain assumption In the weak-measurement (volume-law) phase, unitary evolution between informative measurements fully scrambles the state, so the next measured Pauli is effectively uniform among non-identity strings.
    Justifies the reduction to the global model and the emergence of rates p_L(r) depending only on rank; stated in the construction of the effective global model.
  • domain assumption Born-rule outcome average for rank observables cancels exactly, leaving a pure Markov process on the integer rank r.
    Derived in End Matter A from the three classes of Pauli strings relative to W and W^⊥; holds only for N=1 (Born) averages.
  • domain assumption Local brick-wall circuits with weak measurement rate flow, after a single time rescaling by T_P(L), to the same universal death process.
    Supported by numerical collapse for three measurement protocols; not proven analytically.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 30283 in / 2928 out tokens · 35917 ms · 2026-07-10T23:27:51.569425+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Quantum circuits under sufficiently weak monitoring purify on a timescale $T_P$ exponentially long in the system size. This slowness underlies a universal purification dynamics, whose quantitative description has so far required the replica trick, with a delicate analytic continuation. We show that monitored Clifford circuits on $L$ qudits of prime dimension $q$ bypass this construction entirely: in the scaling limit at fixed $x = t/T_P(L)$, purification reduces to the Markovian decay of the density-matrix rank, an exactly solvable death process descending from infinity. We compute the full scaling functions in compact form: all R\'enyi entropies collapse onto a universal curve $\langle S(x) \rangle$. Exact stabilizer simulations at $q=2,3,5$ confirm the predictions, with no fitting parameter for the global model and $T_P$ as the only fitted scale for local brick-wall circuits. Also, the replica problem amounts to a tilted version of the same Markov process, in agreement with exact computations from the Clifford commutant. Finally, the quantization of the rank leaves two hallmarks that distinguish Clifford dynamics from generic monitored circuits: the entropy fluctuations saturate at short scaled times $x\to0$ to an $O(1)$ variance, instead of vanishing, and observables develop a temporal modulation periodic in $\log_q x$, which cannot be captured by the replica approach.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06683 by Andrea De Luca, Beatrice Magni, Federico Gerbino, Xhek Turkeshi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Exact stabilizer numerics against the theory prediction (dashed), i.e. the death process ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Log-periodic modulation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Universality of Measurement-Induced Criticality under Symmetry-Breaking Measurements

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    Symmetry-breaking local measurements are a relevant perturbation that drives U(1)-symmetric monitored circuits into the generic non-symmetric MIPT universality class, with finite charge correlation length at any measu...

  2. Universality of Measurement-Induced Criticality under Symmetry-Breaking Measurements

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    In U(1)-symmetric monitored random circuits, symmetry-breaking measurements drive the entanglement transition to the non-symmetric universality class and keep the charge correlation length finite at any measurement rate.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 114 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 10 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Nahum, J

    A. Nahum, J. Ruhman, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Quantum entanglement growth under random unitary dynamics, Phys. Rev. X7, 031016 (2017)

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Nahum, S

    A. Nahum, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Operator spreading in random unitary circuits, Phys. Rev. X8, 021014 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    C. W. von Keyserlingk, T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann, and S. L. Sondhi, Operator hydrodynamics, otocs, and entanglement growth in systems without conservation laws, Phys. Rev. X8, 021013 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    M. P. Fisher, V. Khemani, A. Nahum, and S. Vijay, Random quantum circuits, Ann. Rev. Cond. Matter Phys.14, 335 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    A. C. Potter and R. Vasseur, Entanglement dynamics in hybrid quantum circuits, inEntanglement in Spin Chains: From Theory to Quantum Technology Applica- tions, edited by A. Bayat, S. Bose, and H. Johannesson (Springer, Cham, 2022) pp. 211–249

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    O. Lunt, J. Richter, and A. Pal, Quantum simulation using noisy unitary circuits and measurements, inEn- tanglement in Spin Chains: From Theory to Quantum Technology Applications, edited by A. Bayat, S. Bose, and H. Johannesson (Springer, Cham, 2022) pp. 251– 284

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Sierant, M

    P. Sierant, M. Schir` o, M. Lewenstein, and X. Turkeshi, Entanglement growth and minimal membranes in (d+1) random unitary circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 230403 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Ippoliti, M

    M. Ippoliti, M. J. Gullans, S. Gopalakrishnan, D. A. Huse, and V. Khemani, Entanglement phase transi- tions in measurement-only dynamics, Phys. Rev. X11, 011030 (2021)

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Sierant, M

    P. Sierant, M. Schir` o, M. Lewenstein, and X. Turkeshi, Measurement-induced phase transitions in (d+ 1)- dimensional stabilizer circuits, Phys. Rev. B106, 214316 (2022)

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Y. Li, X. Chen, and M. P. A. Fisher, Quantum zeno ef- fect and the many-body entanglement transition, Phys. Rev. B98, 205136 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Y. Li, X. Chen, and M. P. A. Fisher, Measurement- driven entanglement transition in hybrid quantum cir- cuits, Phys. Rev. B100, 134306 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Skinner, J

    B. Skinner, J. Ruhman, and A. Nahum, Measurement- induced phase transitions in the dynamics of entangle- ment, Phys. Rev. X9, 031009 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    A. Chan, R. M. Nandkishore, M. Pretko, and G. Smith, Unitary-projective entanglement dynamics, Phys. Rev. B99, 224307 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Szyniszewski, A

    M. Szyniszewski, A. Romito, and H. Schomerus, En- tanglement transition from variable-strength weak mea- surements, Phys. Rev. B100, 064204 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Zabalo, M

    A. Zabalo, M. J. Gullans, J. H. Wilson, S. Gopalakrish- nan, D. A. Huse, and J. H. Pixley, Critical properties of the measurement-induced transition in random quan- tum circuits, Phys. Rev. B101, 060301 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    Turkeshi, R

    X. Turkeshi, R. Fazio, and M. Dalmonte, Measurement- induced criticality in (2 + 1)-dimensional hybrid quan- tum circuits, Phys. Rev. B102, 014315 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Turkeshi, Measurement-induced criticality as a data- structure transition, Phys

    X. Turkeshi, Measurement-induced criticality as a data- structure transition, Phys. Rev. B106, 144313 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Sierant and X

    P. Sierant and X. Turkeshi, Universal behavior be- yond multifractality of wave functions at measurement- induced phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 130605 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Block, Y

    M. Block, Y. Bao, S. Choi, E. Altman, and N. Y. Yao, Measurement-induced transition in long-range interact- ing quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 010604 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Altland, M

    A. Altland, M. Buchhold, S. Diehl, and T. Micklitz, Dy- namics of measured many-body quantum chaotic sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Res.4, L022066 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Han and X

    Y. Han and X. Chen, Entanglement structure in the volume-law phase of hybrid quantum automaton cir- cuits, Phys. Rev. B107, 014306 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Sharma, X

    S. Sharma, X. Turkeshi, R. Fazio, and M. Dalmonte, Measurement-induced criticality in extended and long- range unitary circuits, SciPost Phys. Core5, 023 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Iadecola, J

    T. Iadecola, J. H. Wilson, and J. Pixley, Concomitant entanglement and control criticality driven by collective measurements, PRX Quantum6, 010351 (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Nambi, K

    D. Nambi, K. Khanna, A. Allocca, T. Iadecola, C. Hickey, R. Vasseur, and J. H. Wilson, Post-selected criticality in measurement-induced phase transitions (2026), arXiv:2603.15744 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    C. Noel, P. Niroula, D. Zhu, A. Risinger, L. Egan, D. Biswas, M. Cetina, A. V. Gorshkov, M. J. Gul- lans, D. A. Huse, and C. Monroe, Measurement-induced quantum phases realized in a trapped-ion quantum com- puter, Nat. Phys.18, 760–764 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Z. Chen, K. J. Satzinger, J. Atalaya, A. N. Korotkov, A. Dunsworth, D. Sank, C. Quintana, M. McEwen, R. Barends, P. V. Klimov, S. Hong, C. Jones, A. Petukhov, D. Kafri, S. Demura, B. Burkett, C. Gid- ney, A. G. Fowler, A. Paler, H. Putterman, I. Aleiner, F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush, J. C. Bardin, A. Bengts- son, A. Bourassa, M. Broughton, B. B. Buckley,...

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    J. M. Koh, S.-N. Sun, M. Motta, and A. J. Minnich, Measurement-induced entanglement phase transition on a superconducting quantum processor with mid-circuit readout, Nat. Phys.19, 1314 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    X. Feng, J. Cˆ ot´ e, S. Kourtis, and B. Skinner, Postselection-free experimental observation of the measurement-induced phase transition in circuits with universal gates, Commun. Phys.9, 110 (2026)

    work page 2026

  29. [29]

    Sierant, G

    P. Sierant, G. Chiriac` o, F. M. Surace, S. Sharma, X. Turkeshi, M. Dalmonte, R. Fazio, and G. Pagano, Dissipative Floquet Dynamics: from Steady State to Measurement Induced Criticality in Trapped-ion Chains, Quantum6, 638 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Y. Bao, S. Choi, and E. Altman, Theory of the phase transition in random unitary circuits with measure- ments, Phys. Rev. B101, 104301 (2020)

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    S. Choi, Y. Bao, X.-L. Qi, and E. Altman, Quan- tum error correction in scrambling dynamics and measurement-induced phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 030505 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Jian, Y.-Z

    C.-M. Jian, Y.-Z. You, R. Vasseur, and A. W. W. Lud- wig, Measurement-induced criticality in random quan- tum circuits, Phys. Rev. B101, 104302 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Nahum, S

    A. Nahum, S. Roy, B. Skinner, and J. Ruhman, Mea- surement and entanglement phase transitions in all-to- all quantum circuits, on quantum trees, and in landau- ginsburg theory, PRX Quantum2, 010352 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Y. Bao, S. Choi, and E. Altman, Symmetry enriched phases of quantum circuits, Ann. Phys.435, 168618 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Y. Li, X. Chen, A. W. W. Ludwig, and M. P. A. Fisher, Conformal invariance and quantum nonlocality in crit- ical hybrid circuits, Phys. Rev. B104, 104305 (2021)

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Y. Li, S. Vijay, and M. P. Fisher, Entanglement domain walls in monitored quantum circuits and the directed polymer in a random environment, PRX Quantum4, 010331 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Y. Li, R. Vasseur, M. P. A. Fisher, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Statistical mechanics model for clifford random tensor networks and monitored quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B109, 174307 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    C.-M. Jian, B. Bauer, A. Keselman, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Criticality and entanglement in nonunitary quantum circuits and tensor networks of noninteracting fermions, Phys. Rev. B106, 134206 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    C.-M. Jian, H. Shapourian, B. Bauer, and A. W. Lud- wig, Measurement-induced entanglement transitions in quantum circuits of non-interacting fermions: Born-rule versus forced measurements, arXiv:2302.09094 (2023)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    Nahum and K

    A. Nahum and K. J. Wiese, Renormalization group for measurement and entanglement phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B108, 104203 (2023)

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    Zhang, S.-K

    P. Zhang, S.-K. Jian, C. Liu, and X. Chen, Emergent Replica Conformal Symmetry in Non-Hermitian SYK 2 Chains, Quantum5, 579 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Elusive phase transition in the replica limit of monitored systems

    G. Giachetti and A. De Luca, Elusive phase transi- tion in the replica limit of monitored systems (2023), arXiv:2306.12166 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    M. J. Gullans and D. A. Huse, Dynamical purification phase transition induced by quantum measurements, Phys. Rev. X10, 041020 (2020)

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    M. J. Gullans and D. A. Huse, Scalable probes of measurement-induced criticality, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 070606 (2020)

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    G. S. Bentsen, S. Sahu, and B. Swingle, Measurement- induced purification in large-nhybrid brownian circuits, Phys. Rev. B104, 094304 (2021)

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    Gopalakrishnan and M

    S. Gopalakrishnan and M. J. Gullans, Entanglement and purification transitions in non-hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 170503 (2021)

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    Ippoliti and W

    M. Ippoliti and W. W. Ho, Dynamical purification and the emergence of quantum state designs from the pro- jected ensemble, PRX Quantum4, 030322 (2023)

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    Fidkowski, J

    L. Fidkowski, J. Haah, and M. B. Hastings, How dynam- ical quantum memories forget, Quantum5, 382 (2021)

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    Ippoliti and V

    M. Ippoliti and V. Khemani, Postselection-free entan- glement dynamics via spacetime duality, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 060501 (2021)

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    Leontica and M

    S. Leontica and M. McGinley, Purification dynamics in a continuous-time hybrid quantum circuit model, Phys. Rev. B108, 174308 (2023)

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    Anzai, H

    K. Anzai, H. Matsueda, and Y. Kuno, Disordered purifi- cation phase transition in hybrid random circuits, Phys. Rev. B113, 014111 (2026)

    work page 2026

  52. [52]

    Han and X

    Y. Han and X. Chen, Measurement-induced critical- ity in𭟋 2-symmetric quantum automaton circuits, Phys. Rev. B105, 064306 (2022)

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Kawabata, T

    K. Kawabata, T. Numasawa, and S. Ryu, Entanglement phase transition induced by the non-hermitian skin ef- fect, Phys. Rev. X13, 021007 (2023)

    work page 2023

  54. [54]

    P. W. Claeys, M. Henry, J. Vicary, and A. Lamacraft, Exact dynamics in dual-unitary quantum circuits with projective measurements, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 043212 (2022)

    work page 2022

  55. [55]

    Bompais, N

    M. Bompais, N. H. Amini, J. P. Garrahan, and M. Gut ¸˘ a, The rate of purification of quantum trajectories (2026), arXiv:2601.14023 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    Iaconis, A

    J. Iaconis, A. Lucas, and X. Chen, Measurement- induced phase transitions in quantum automaton cir- cuits, Phys. Rev. B102, 224311 (2020)

    work page 2020

  57. [57]

    Lavasani, Y

    A. Lavasani, Y. Alavirad, and M. Barkeshli, Topologi- cal order and criticality in (2 + 1)D monitored random quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 235701 (2021)

    work page 2021

  58. [58]

    Measurement-Induced Entanglement Phase Transition in Random Bilocal Circuits

    X. Yu and X.-L. Qi, Measurement-induced entangle- ment phase transition in random bilocal circuits (2022), arXiv:2201.12704 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  59. [59]

    Zabalo, J

    A. Zabalo, J. H. Wilson, M. J. Gullans, R. Vasseur, S. Gopalakrishnan, D. A. Huse, and J. H. Pixley, Infinite-randomness criticality in monitored quantum dynamics with static disorder, Phys. Rev. B107, L220204 (2023)

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    Y.-C. Wang, E. Altman, and S. J. Garratt, Stability of quantum chaos against weak non-unitarity (2025), arXiv:2512.02934 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Y. Kuno, T. Orito, and I. Ichinose, Purification and scrambling in a chaotic hamiltonian dynamics with mea- surements, Phys. Rev. B106, 214304 (2022)

    work page 2022

  62. [62]

    De Luca, C

    A. De Luca, C. Liu, A. Nahum, and T. Zhou, Universal- ity classes for purification in nonunitary quantum pro- cesses, Phys. Rev. X15, 041024 (2025)

    work page 2025

  63. [63]

    Gerbino, D

    F. Gerbino, D. Kim, G. Giachetti, A. De Luca, and X. Turkeshi, Universal purification dynam- ics in real non-unitary quantum processes (2026), 8 arXiv:2603.10751 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  64. [64]

    Z. Xiao, T. Ohtsuki, and K. Kawabata, Universal stochastic equations of monitored quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 140401 (2025)

    work page 2025

  65. [65]

    Patel, C

    S. Patel, C. McCarthy, A. Chakraborty, J. Huang, T. J. DiNapoli, R. Vasseur, J. H. Pixley, and S. Chakram, Universal monitored dynamics in multimode bosonic systems (2026), arXiv:2603.13125 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  66. [66]

    V. B. Bulchandani, S. L. Sondhi, and J. T. Chalker, Random-matrix models of monitored quantum circuits, J. Stat. Phys.191, 55 (2024)

    work page 2024

  67. [67]

    Gerbino, P

    F. Gerbino, P. Le Doussal, G. Giachetti, and A. De Luca, A dyson brownian motion model for weak mea- surements in chaotic quantum systems, Quantum Rep. 6, 200 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    M. L. Mehta,Random matrices(Elsevier, 2004)

    work page 2004

  69. [69]

    Lavasani, Y

    A. Lavasani, Y. Alavirad, and M. Barkeshli, Measurement-induced topological entanglement transitions in symmetric random quantum circuits, Nature Phys.17, 342 (2021)

    work page 2021

  70. [70]

    A complete theory of the Clifford commutant

    L. Bittel, J. Eisert, L. Leone, A. A. Mele, and S. F. E. Oliviero, A complete theory of the clifford commutant (2025), arXiv:2504.12263 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    Magni, M

    B. Magni, M. Heinrich, L. Leone, and X. Turkeshi, An- ticoncentration and state design of doped real clifford circuits and tensor networks, Phys. Rev. A113, 062446 (2026)

    work page 2026

  72. [72]

    O. Lunt, M. Szyniszewski, and A. Pal, Measurement- induced criticality and entanglement clusters: A study of one-dimensional and two-dimensional clifford circuits, Phys. Rev. B104, 155111 (2021)

    work page 2021

  73. [73]

    Shkolnik, A

    G. Shkolnik, A. Zabalo, R. Vasseur, D. A. Huse, J. H. Pixley, and S. Gazit, Measurement induced criticality in quasiperiodic modulated random hybrid circuits, Phys. Rev. B108, 184204 (2023)

    work page 2023

  74. [74]

    Webb, The Clifford group forms a unitary 3-design, Quantum Inf

    Z. Webb, The Clifford group forms a unitary 3-design, Quantum Inf. Comput.16, 1379 (2016)

    work page 2016

  75. [75]

    Zhu, Multiqubit Clifford groups are unitary 3- designs, Phys

    H. Zhu, Multiqubit Clifford groups are unitary 3- designs, Phys. Rev. A96, 062336 (2017)

    work page 2017

  76. [76]

    Gross, S

    D. Gross, S. Nezami, and M. Walter, Schur–weyl du- ality for the clifford group with applications: Property testing, a robust hudson theorem, and de finetti repre- sentations, Commun. Math. Phys.385, 1325 (2021)

    work page 2021

  77. [77]

    Stabilizer Codes and Quantum Error Correction

    D. Gottesman,Stabilizer codes and quantum error cor- rection, Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology (1997), arXiv:quant-ph/9705052

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  78. [78]

    Aaronson and D

    S. Aaronson and D. Gottesman, Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits, Phys. Rev. A70, 052328 (2004)

    work page 2004

  79. [79]

    Gidney, Stim: a fast stabilizer circuit simulator, Quantum5, 497 (2021)

    C. Gidney, Stim: a fast stabilizer circuit simulator, Quantum5, 497 (2021)

    work page 2021

  80. [80]

    Hadamard-free circuits expose the structure of the Clifford group

    S. Bravyi and D. Maslov, Hadamard-free circuits expose the structure of the Clifford group, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory67, 4546 (2021), arXiv:2003.09412

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.