Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 51 references

Calabi-Yau deformations reproduce 5d Higgs branch stratification

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · glm-5.2

2026-07-10 00:12 UTC pith:62J2SKCU

load-bearing objection Geometric Hasse diagrams reproduce Higgs branch stratifications for box-diagram CY3s, but the method needs magnetic quiver input for T_n theories the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.06851 v1 pith:62J2SKCU submitted 2026-07-07 hep-th

5d Higgs Branches: Stratifications from Geometry

Mario De Marco , Michele Del Zotto , Julius Grimminger , Andrea Sangiovanni This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords Higgs branch5d SCFTCalabi-Yau threefoldcomplex structure deformationsymplectic singularitymagnetic quivergeometric engineeringHasse diagram
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes that the stratification of Higgs branches of 5d superconformal field theories can be read off entirely from the geometry of the Calabi-Yau threefold that engineers the theory in M-theory. Specifically, for toric Calabi-Yau threefolds with non-isolated singularities, the dynamical complex structure deformations of the threefold correspond one-to-one with the symplectic leaves of the Higgs branch. Each monomial deformation of the threefold's defining equations triggers a specific Higgs branch RG flow, and the resulting hierarchy of deformed geometries reproduces the Hasse diagram of the Higgs branch. The authors demonstrate this explicitly for the T_{3,3} and T_4 theories, showing complete agreement with the stratification previously derived from magnetic quiver techniques. The key mechanism is a criterion, adapted from prior work on Type IIA D6-brane loci, that distinguishes dynamical (normalizable) deformations from non-dynamical ones by checking whether a deformation acts on compact versus non-compact brane stacks. For the T_n family, the authors also identify purely M-theoretic deformations invisible to any Type IIA reduction, which correspond to RG flows between T_n theories of decreasing rank.

Core claim

The central claim is that the full stratification of the Higgs branch of a 5d SCFT into symplectic leaves is encoded in the dynamical complex structure deformations of the non-compact Calabi-Yau threefold that geometrically engineers the theory. By explicitly computing which deformations of threefolds with non-isolated singularities are dynamical, and organizing them into families associated with the non-isolated singular lines, the authors reconstruct the complete Hasse diagram of the Higgs branch. The construction is verified against magnetic quiver results for the T_{3,3} and T_4 theories, with each geometric deformation matched to a specific brane movement in the dual 5-brane web. The T_

What carries the argument

The geometric Hasse diagram: a construction where each node is a deformed Calabi-Yau threefold (corresponding to a symplectic leaf), each edge is a dynamical complex structure deformation (corresponding to an RG flow), and the dynamical deformations are selected by a criterion that discards deformations proportional to the compact D6-brane locus in a Type IIA reduction. For T_n theories, purely M-theoretic deformations (the c_i w^i terms) are added by exploiting permutation symmetry of the three singular lines and matching against magnetic quiver data.

Load-bearing premise

The criterion for selecting dynamical deformations, which discards any deformation proportional to the compact brane locus in a Type IIA D6-brane picture, is physically motivated but not rigorously proven to capture all and only the normalizable modes. The deformation theory of threefolds with non-isolated singularities is not fully developed mathematically, and for the T_n theories some deformations are inserted by hand using symmetry and magnetic quiver data rather than ded

What would settle it

A leaf in the geometric Hasse diagram whose Higgs branch dimension, computed from the deformation count of the corresponding threefold, disagrees with the dimension obtained from the magnetic quiver Coulomb branch. Alternatively, a dynamical deformation that the brane-locus criterion classifies as normalizable but that the magnetic quiver Hasse diagram has no corresponding transition for, or vice versa.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Geometric engineering can now characterize not just the dimension but the full stratification of 5d Higgs branches, reducing dependence on magnetic quiver techniques for theories where the latter are unavailable.
  • The correspondence between monomial deformations and monopole vevs suggests a direct geometric dictionary for the Higgs branch chiral ring, which the authors state they pursue in a forthcoming publication.
  • Altmann's algorithm for isolated toric singularity deformations, combined with the non-isolated singularity methods here, could in principle yield dynamical deformations for arbitrary toric Calabi-Yau threefolds.
  • The identification of purely M-theoretic deformations invisible to Type IIA indicates that any approach relying solely on lower-dimensional brane reductions will systematically miss part of the Higgs branch structure.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript proposes a geometric method to determine the stratification of Higgs branches of 5d SCFTs engineered by M-theory on non-compact Calabi-Yau threefolds with non-isolated singularities. The central tool is the 'geometric Hasse diagram,' in which dynamical complex structure deformations of the threefold are identified with Higgs branch RG flows, and the resulting singularity at each leaf corresponds to a symplectic leaf of the Higgs branch. The method relies on a criterion from Collinucci-Valandro [36]: after a partial crepant resolution and Type IIA reduction, deformations proportional to the compact D6-brane locus are discarded as non-dynamical, and the remaining deformations are identified with Higgs branch moduli. The authors work out two detailed examples—the T_{3,3} theory (Section 3) and the T_4 theory (Section 4)—and show full agreement with the Hasse diagrams obtained from magnetic quiver (MQ) techniques, including quiver subtraction and decay-and-fission. A connection to generalized toric polygons (GTPs) and tachyon condensation is also made in Section 5.

Significance. The Higgs branch stratification of 5d SCFTs has, up to now, been primarily accessible through magnetic quiver technology. A purely geometric route would be a valuable complementary tool, especially for theories where MQs are not readily available. The explicit matching of every monomial deformation to a specific MQ leaf and to a 5-brane movement in the web (Figures 2 and 8) is a concrete and falsifiable achievement. The observation that certain deformations (the c_i w^i terms in Eq. 4.10) are invisible to every Type IIA reduction and are intrinsically M-theoretic is physically interesting, as it highlights a genuine limitation of the Type IIA D6-brane locus criterion and points toward genuinely M-theoretic moduli. The extension to GTPs and tachyon descriptions in Section 5 usefully situates the results within the broader literature.

major comments (3)
  1. §4.1, Eq. (4.10) and surrounding text: The abstract states that the stratification is constructed 'purely relying on geometry.' However, for the T_n theories, the n-1 intrinsically M-theoretic deformations (the c_i w^i terms) are identified by using the expected Higgs branch dimension from the magnetic quiver (Eq. 4.5) and permutation symmetry, and then reverse-engineering the missing monomials. The authors acknowledge this ('we are missing n dynamical deformations... These deformations cannot be detected via a Type IIA reduction'), but the phrase 'purely relying on geometry' in the abstract overstates the current scope of the method. The method as presented is geometric for T_{n,k} box diagrams but requires MQ input for completeness in the T_n case. The authors should either soften the abstract's claim or clarify that the geometric method is conjecturally complete but currently requires
  2. §3.2, point 3 (the D6-brane locus criterion): The selection rule—discard deformations proportional to the compact brane locus—is physically motivated but not proven to be complete. The agreement with MQ results for T_{3,3} and T_4 is strong evidence, but it does not rule out the possibility that the criterion works for these specific singularity types while failing for others. The authors note (footnote 3) that the mathematical deformation theory for non-isolated singularities is not rigorously defined. Given that this criterion is load-bearing for every computation in the paper, the authors should more clearly delineate its status: is it conjectured to be complete for all toric CY3 with non-isolated singularities, or only for the specific classes studied here? A brief statement of the expected scope would strengthen the paper.
  3. §3.4, Eq. (3.36) and footnote 5: The counting of 17 independent deformations for T_{3,3} involves discarding the deformation k_1 via a coordinate shift of z. The statement 'Shifting z by a constant and renaming the deformation parameters we can e.g. eliminate the deformation k_1' should be made more explicit. Is this a standard coordinate redefinition that preserves the Calabi-Yau condition? A reader should be able to verify that the 17 count is robust and not an artifact of a particular coordinate choice.
minor comments (6)
  1. The notation for quivers (Appendix B) is clear, but the main text uses both framed and unframed quiver notation (e.g., Eq. 3.20 vs. 3.21) without always stating which is being used. A brief reminder at the first use in Section 3.3 would help.
  2. Figure 1 (the (p,q)-web for T_{3,3}) is referenced but the external 7-brane labels are not shown. Adding them would make the correspondence in Figure 2 easier to follow.
  3. In Eq. (3.43), the formula #dynamical deformations(T_{n,k}) = n^2 + k^2 - 1 is stated without derivation. A one-line derivation or reference would be helpful.
  4. The reference to 'forthcoming publication [29]' appears for the identification of monomial deformations with monopole vevs. If this is a central part of the program, the present paper would benefit from at least a sketch of the correspondence, even if details are deferred.
  5. Typo in §3.2, point 4: 'the geometries in (3.13) are a special case of the bifundamental 5d conformal matter theories studied in [34]' — the reference number should be checked against the bibliography (the cited [34] appears to be a different paper).
  6. In §4.2, the Hasse diagram in Figure 6 uses black for the w^3 node, but the color code is introduced only in the caption. Stating the color convention in the text would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the geometric Hasse diagram is derived from CY3 deformation theory and checked against an independent MQ computation; the T_n missing deformations use MQ data but only as a consistency target, not as a definitional input.

full rationale

The paper's core derivation for T_{n,k} theories is self-contained: dynamical deformations are identified via the Type IIA D6-brane locus criterion (Section 3.2, building on [36]), the UV Higgs branch dimension is computed as ν + dim(A_{n-1}) (Eq. 3.14), and the stratification is reconstructed from monomial deformations of the CY3 equations (Eq. 3.36). The magnetic quiver (MQ) Hasse diagram is then presented as an independent consistency check (Section 3.5), not as an input to the geometric construction. For the T_n theories (Section 4), the authors acknowledge that n-1 'intrinsically M-theoretic' deformations (the c_i w^i terms in Eq. 4.10) cannot be detected via any Type IIA reduction. They use the expected HB dimension from the MQ (Eq. 4.5) to infer the existence of these missing terms. While this means the geometric method is not fully self-contained for T_n, this is a case of using an external benchmark to identify a gap in the geometric construction, not a circular definition. The geometric Hasse diagram itself (Figure 6) is still constructed from the deformed CY3 equation (4.10), and the MQ comparison (Figure 7) serves as verification. The self-citations ([32,34]) are to prior work on 5d conformal matter classification and do not form a load-bearing chain that defines the present result. The abstract's claim of constructing stratification 'purely relying on geometry' is aspirational and slightly overstated for T_n, but the T_{n,k} case (the main detailed example) genuinely derives the Hasse diagram from geometry first and checks against MQ second. No step reduces to its own inputs by definition or fit. Score 2 reflects the minor reliance on MQ data to complete the T_n deformation count, which slightly tempers the 'purely geometric' framing but does not constitute circularity in the logical sense.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

The paper relies on standard geometric engineering axioms and introduces one ad-hoc criterion (the D6-brane locus selection rule from [36]) and one ad-hoc addition (M-theoretic deformations for T_n). No free parameters are fitted.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption M-theory on a non-compact canonical CY3 singularity engineers a 5d SCFT.
    Standard geometric engineering dictionary, invoked in Section 1 and 2.
  • domain assumption Dynamical complex structure deformations of the engineering CY3 correspond to Higgs branch directions of the 5d SCFT.
    Standard identification used throughout, e.g., Section 1 and 2.1.
  • ad hoc to paper Deformations proportional to the compact D6-brane locus are non-dynamical and should be discarded.
    Section 3.2, based on [36]. This is the key criterion for selecting dynamical deformations in the non-isolated case, physically motivated but not mathematically proven.
  • ad hoc to paper For T_n theories, n intrinsically M-theoretic deformations of the form c_i w^i exist.
    Section 4.1, Eq. 4.10. These are added to match the expected HB dimension from MQ data, as they cannot be seen in Type IIA.
invented entities (1)
  • Geometric Hasse diagram independent evidence
    purpose: Encodes the stratification of the Higgs branch in terms of dynamical complex structure deformations of the engineering threefold.
    The entity is a new organizational tool, not a new physical object. Its validity is tested against independent MQ predictions in Sections 3.5 and 4.2.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-glm · 27300 in / 2614 out tokens · 299593 ms · 2026-07-10T00:12:26.632858+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Higgs Branches of 5d SCFTs are hyperk\"ahler cones, symplectic varieties with interesting nested singularities governing the structure of possible Higgs branch RG flows. The main purpose of this note is to investigate 5d Higgs Branches via a geometric route: we study 5d SCFTs geometrically engineered from M-theory on non-compact Calabi-Yau threefolds, with non-isolated singularities. We match the (dynamical) complex structure deformations of the threefold with the symplectic leaves in the Higgs branch of the 5d SCFT, constructing its stratification purely relying on geometry. Consistency checks for our proposal are presented exploiting magnetic quivers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06851 by Andrea Sangiovanni, Julius Grimminger, Mario De Marco, Michele Del Zotto.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Infinite-coupling (p,q)-web for the T3,3 theory. arising from the two equations yields a full description of the UV Hasse diagram. In Section 4, we show an example where the Type IIA reduction is not sufficient to recover the full UV Higgs branch, as additional normalizable deformations can appear. 3.5 Consistency Check from Magnetic Quiver In this section we present an alternative derivation of the Hasse … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Correspondence between branes movements and dynamical deformations in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Toric diagram of the Tn theories. The three sides have equal lattice length. Alternatively, they can be engineered via M-theory on the orbifold C 3/(Zn × Zn), which can be nicely displayed as a hypersurface equation: xyz = w n ⊂ C 4 . (4.1) In order to inspect the deformation theory of (4.1), it is convenient to rewrite it as a C ∗ -fibration. This is equivalent to choosing a Type IIA reduction of the M-th… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Hasse diagram of the T4 deformations that deform the curve y = z = w = 0. We can proceed analogously for the other two curves, obtaining the following partial Hasse diagrams 30 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Partial Hasse diagrams associated with the curves [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Geometric Hasse diagram of the T4 theory, with leaves labeled by complex deformations. 31 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Hasse diagram of the T4 theory in terms of leaves labeled by magnetic quivers. We conclude by remarking that all the dynamical deformation monomials can be matched to movement of 5-branes in the corresponding (p, q)-web. For the T4 case the match is as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Correspondence between branes movements and dynamical deformations in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: On the left: usual toric diagram with the corresponding 5-brane-web at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: GTP for the T5 theory with two white dots. It is a GTP for the T5 theory with white dots on two non-parallel edges: hence no tachyon describing this configuration exists. It is then proven that the associated deformed geometry is: xyz = w 5 + c1xw3 + c2yw3 . (5.12) It is straightforward to check that the deformations in (5.12) are dynamical, and are a special case of the fully deformed T5 threefold, shown… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: GTP for the T5 theory with two white dots. The dynamical deformations of (A.1) can be readily computed as:    xy = z n + P i≥1,j≥0 i+j≤n−1 ciju i z j + P i≥1,j≥0 i+j≤n−1 cˆijv i z j + P i≥1 c˜iz i , uv = y k1 z k2 + P 0<i≤k2 0≤j≤k2−i dijy i z j + P 0≤i<nk1+k2−1 0≤j<nk1+k2−1−i ˆdijx i z j . (A.2) E.g. for n = 3, k1 = 1, k2 = 2 the fully deformed threefold reads:    xy = z 3 + c1u + c2uz +… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Magnetic quiver for the geometry in (A.1) with n = 3, k1 = 1, k2 = 2. The dimension of the MQ Coulomb Branch is 21, in agreement with the amount of normalizable deformations in (A.3). Notice that one could also have interpreted the undeformed geometry corresponding to (A.3) as a leaf in the Hasse diagram of the 5d SCFT engineered by (3.9), for some choice of n and k. This is evident from the magnetic quiv… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · 38 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    String Theory Dynamics In Various Dimensions

    E. Witten, “String theory dynamics in various dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B443 (1995) 85–126,hep-th/9503124

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  2. [2]

    Open P-Branes

    A. Strominger, “Open p-branes,”Phys. Lett. B383(1996) 44–47,hep-th/9512059

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  3. [3]

    Five-branes And $M$-Theory On An Orbifold

    E. Witten, “Five-branes and M theory on an orbifold,”Nucl. Phys. B463(1996) 383–397,hep-th/9512219

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  4. [4]

    Small $E_8$ Instantons and Tensionless Non-critical Strings

    O. J. Ganor and A. Hanany, “Small E(8) instantons and tensionless noncritical strings,”Nucl. Phys. B474(1996) 122–140,hep-th/9602120

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  5. [5]

    Non-trivial Fixed Points of The Renormalization Group in Six Dimensions

    N. Seiberg, “Nontrivial fixed points of the renormalization group in six-dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B390(1997) 169–171,hep-th/9609161

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  6. [6]

    Five dimensional susy field theories, non-trivial fixed points and string dynamics,

    N. Seiberg, “Five dimensional susy field theories, non-trivial fixed points and string dynamics,”Physics Letters B388(Nov, 1996) 753–760. 42

    work page 1996

  7. [7]

    Extremal transitions and five-dimensional super- symmetric field theories,

    D. R. Morrison and N. Seiberg, “Extremal transitions and five-dimensional super- symmetric field theories,”Nuclear Physics B483(Jan, 1997) 229–247

    work page 1997

  8. [8]

    Small Instantons, del Pezzo Surfaces and Type I' theory

    M. R. Douglas, S. H. Katz, and C. Vafa, “Small instantons, Del Pezzo surfaces and type I-prime theory,”Nucl. Phys. B497(1997) 155–172,hep-th/9609071

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  9. [9]

    Branes and toric geometry,

    N. C. Leung and C. Vafa, “Branes and toric geometry,” 1997

    work page 1997

  10. [10]

    Phase transitions in m-theory and f-theory,

    E. Witten, “Phase transitions in m-theory and f-theory,”Nuclear Physics B471 (Jul, 1996) 195–216

    work page 1996

  11. [11]

    Five-dimensional supersymmetric gauge theories and degenerations of calabi-yau spaces,

    K. Intriligator, D. R. Morrison, and N. Seiberg, “Five-dimensional supersymmetric gauge theories and degenerations of calabi-yau spaces,”Nuclear Physics B497(Jul,

    work page

  12. [12]

    Three dimensional canonical singularity and five dimensional nN= 1 scft,

    D. Xie and S.-T. Yau, “Three dimensional canonical singularity and five dimensional nN= 1 scft,”Journal of High Energy Physics2017(Jun, 2017)

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    On geometric classification of 5d scfts,

    P. Jefferson, S. Katz, H.-C. Kim, and C. Vafa, “On geometric classification of 5d scfts,”Journal of High Energy Physics2018(Apr, 2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    On the classification of 5d SCFTs

    L. Bhardwaj, “On the classification of 5d SCFTs,”JHEP09(2020) 007,1909.09635

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    Dualities of 5d gauge theories from S-duality

    L. Bhardwaj, “Dualities of 5d gauge theories from S-duality,”JHEP07(2020) 012, 1909.05250

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  16. [16]

    Five-dimensional scfts and gauge theory phases: an m-theory/type iia perspective,

    C. Closset, M. Del Zotto, and V. Saxena, “Five-dimensional scfts and gauge theory phases: an m-theory/type iia perspective,”SciPost Physics6(May, 2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Fibers add Flavor, Part I: Classification of 5d SCFTs, Flavor Symmetries and BPS States

    F. Apruzzi, C. Lawrie, L. Lin, S. Schäfer-Nameki, and Y.-N. Wang, “Fibers add Flavor, Part I: Classification of 5d SCFTs, Flavor Symmetries and BPS States,” JHEP11(2019) 068,1907.05404

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  18. [18]

    Fibers add flavor. part II. 5d SCFTs, gauge theories, and dualities,

    F. Apruzzi, C. Lawrie, L. Lin, S. Schäfer-Nameki, and Y.-N. Wang, “Fibers add flavor. part II. 5d SCFTs, gauge theories, and dualities,”Journal of High Energy Physics2020(mar, 2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Towards Classification of 5d SCFTs: Single Gauge Node

    P. Jefferson, H.-C. Kim, C. Vafa, and G. Zafrir, “Towards classification of 5d SCFTs: Single gauge node,”SciPost Phys.14(2023), no. 5, 122,1705.05836

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Five Dimensional SUSY Field Theories, Non-trivial Fixed Points and String Dynamics

    N. Seiberg, “Five-dimensional SUSY field theories, nontrivial fixed points and string dynamics,”Phys. Lett. B388(1996) 753–760,hep-th/9608111. 43

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  21. [21]

    Phase Transitions In M-Theory And F-Theory

    E. Witten, “Phase transitions in M theory and F theory,”Nucl. Phys. B471(1996) 195–216,hep-th/9603150

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  22. [22]

    The vanishing topology of non isolated singularities,

    D. Siersma, “The vanishing topology of non isolated singularities,” inNew develop- ments in singularity theory, pp. 447–472. Springer, 2001

    work page 2001

  23. [23]

    Tropical Geometry and Five Dimensional Higgs Branches at Infinite Coupling

    S. Cabrera, A. Hanany, and F. Yagi, “Tropical Geometry and Five Dimensional Higgs Branches at Infinite Coupling,”JHEP01(2019) 068,1810.01379

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  24. [24]

    Quiver Subtractions

    S. Cabrera and A. Hanany, “Quiver Subtractions,”JHEP09(2018) 008, 1803.11205

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    Decay and Fission of Magnetic Quivers

    A. Bourget, M. Sperling, and Z. Zhong, “Decay and Fission of Magnetic Quivers,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024), no. 22, 221603,2312.05304

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Higgs branch RG-flows via Decay and Fission

    A. Bourget, M. Sperling, and Z. Zhong, “Higgs branch RG flows via decay and fission,”Phys. Rev. D109(2024), no. 12, 126013,2401.08757

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Monopole operators and Hilbert series of Coulomb branches of 3d N = 4 gauge theories

    S. Cremonesi, A. Hanany, and A. Zaffaroni, “Monopole operators and Hilbert series of Coulomb branches of3dN = 4gauge theories,”JHEP01(2014) 005, 1309.2657

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  28. [28]

    Confinement in Five Dimensions

    B. S. Acharya, “Confinement in Five Dimensions,”2407.03171

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    5d Higgs Branches: Monopoles from Geometry,

    M. De Marco, M. Del Zotto, J. F. Grimminger, and A. Sangiovanni, “5d Higgs Branches: Monopoles from Geometry,”

    work page

  30. [30]

    One parameter families containing three dimensional toric gorenstein singularities,

    K. Altmann, “One parameter families containing three dimensional toric gorenstein singularities,”Explicit birational geometry of(2000) 21–50

    work page 2000

  31. [31]

    The versal Deformation of an isolated toric Gorenstein Singularity

    K. Altmann, “The versal deformation of an isolated toric gorenstein singularity,” arXiv preprint alg-geom/9403004(1994)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  32. [32]

    Remarks on the Higgs Branch of 5d Conformal Matter

    M. De Marco, M. Del Zotto, J. F. Grimminger, and A. Sangiovanni, “Remarks on the Higgs Branch of 5d Conformal Matter,”2502.04431

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    5d Conformal Matter

    M. De Marco, M. Del Zotto, M. Graffeo, and A. Sangiovanni, “5d Conformal Matter,” 2311.04984

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    From Quivers to Geometry: 5d Conformal Matter

    A. Bourget, M. De Marco, M. Del Zotto, J. F. Grimminger, and A. Sangiovanni, “From Quivers to Geometry: 5d Conformal Matter,”2605.03119

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    5d Trinions and Tetraons

    M. De Marco, M. Del Zotto, M. Graffeo, and A. Sangiovanni, “5d Trinions and Tetraons,”2605.16497. 44

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [36]

    The role of U(1)'s in 5d theories, Higgs branches, and geometry

    A. Collinucci and R. Valandro, “The role of U(1)’s in 5d theories, Higgs branches, and geometry,”2006.15464

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  37. [37]

    Non-toric brane webs, Calabi-Yau 3-folds, and 5d SCFTs,

    V. Alexeev, H. Argüz, and P. Bousseau, “Non-toric brane webs, Calabi-Yau 3-folds, and 5d SCFTs,”2410.04714

    work page arXiv

  38. [38]

    A Note on Enhanced Gauge Symmetries in M- and String Theory

    A. Sen, “A Note on enhanced gauge symmetries in M and string theory,”JHEP09 (1997) 001,hep-th/9707123

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  39. [39]

    The Higgs Mechanism -- Hasse Diagrams for Symplectic Singularities

    A. Bourget, S. Cabrera, J. F. Grimminger, A. Hanany, M. Sperling, A. Zajac, and Z. Zhong, “The Higgs mechanism — Hasse diagrams for symplectic singularities,” JHEP01(2020) 157,1908.04245

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  40. [40]

    Generalized Toric Polygons, T-branes, and 5d SCFTs

    A. Bourget, A. Collinucci, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Generalized Toric Polygons, T-branes, and 5d SCFTs,”2301.05239

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    Coulomb and Higgs Branches from Canonical Singularities: Part 0

    C. Closset, S. Schafer-Nameki, and Y.-N. Wang, “Coulomb and Higgs Branches from Canonical Singularities: Part 0,”2007.15600

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  42. [42]

    Webs of five-branes and N=2 superconformal field theories

    F. Benini, S. Benvenuti, and Y. Tachikawa, “Webs of five-branes and N=2 super- conformal field theories,”JHEP09(2009) 052,0906.0359

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  43. [43]

    (Symplectic) Leaves and (5d Higgs) Branches in the Poly(go)nesian Tropical Rain Forest

    M. van Beest, A. Bourget, J. Eckhard, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “(Symplectic) Leaves and (5d Higgs) Branches in the Poly(go)nesian Tropical Rain Forest,”JHEP11 (2020) 124,2008.05577

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Tachyon Condensation on the Brane Antibrane System

    A. Sen, “Tachyon condensation on the brane anti-brane system,”JHEP08(1998) 012,hep-th/9805170

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  45. [45]

    T-branes as branes within branes

    A. Collinucci and R. Savelli, “T-branes as branes within branes,”JHEP09(2015) 161,1410.4178

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  46. [46]

    Magnetic Lattices for Orthosymplectic Quivers

    A. Bourget, J. F. Grimminger, A. Hanany, R. Kalveks, M. Sperling, and Z. Zhong, “Magnetic Lattices for Orthosymplectic Quivers,”JHEP12(2020) 092,2007.04667

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  47. [47]

    Branes, Superpotentials and Superconformal Fixed Points

    O. Aharony and A. Hanany, “Branes, superpotentials and superconformal fixed points,”Nucl. Phys. B504(1997) 239–271,hep-th/9704170

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  48. [48]

    Webs of (p,q) 5-branes, Five Dimensional Field Theories and Grid Diagrams

    O. Aharony, A. Hanany, and B. Kol, “Webs of (p,q) five-branes, five-dimensional field theories and grid diagrams,”JHEP01(1998) 002,hep-th/9710116. 45

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  49. [49]

    Five-branes, Seven-branes and Five-dimensional E_n field theories

    O. DeWolfe, A. Hanany, A. Iqbal, and E. Katz, “Five-branes, seven-branes and five-dimensional E(n) field theories,”JHEP03(1999) 006,hep-th/9902179

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  50. [50]

    Type IIB Superstrings, BPS Monopoles, And Three-Dimensional Gauge Dynamics

    A. Hanany and E. Witten, “Type IIB superstrings, BPS monopoles, and three- dimensional gauge dynamics,”Nucl. Phys. B492(1997) 152–190,hep-th/9611230

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  51. [51]

    The Cat's Cradle: Deforming the higher rank $E_1$ and $\tilde{E}_1$ theories

    O. Bergman and D. Rodríguez-Gómez, “The Cat’s Cradle: deforming the higher rank E1 and ˜E1 theories,”JHEP02(2021) 122,2011.05125. 46

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021