Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 44 references

In 2D top contacts the Schottky barrier is set by nonlocal electrostatic coupling of channel defects to the contact edge, not only by local chemistry.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-10 10:34 UTC pith:FLXHTE2O

load-bearing objection Clean nonlocal kernel plus DFT that shows remote vacancies can swing lateral SBH by hundreds of meV; near-edge points are the soft spot, not the whole story. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.08253 v1 pith:FLXHTE2O submitted 2026-07-09 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Nonlocal Electrostatic Origin of Schottky-Barrier Variability in 2D Contacts

Hangbo Zhou , Yong-Wei Zhang This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords two-dimensional semiconductorsSchottky barriermetal contactsMoS2defect electrostaticsDFT-NEGFnonlocal edge response
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that the large, long-standing scatter in measured Schottky barrier heights for the same metal on monolayer MoS2 is not mainly a failure of local interface theory. In top-contact geometry, carriers inject at the contact edge, so a remote defect in the uncovered channel can still shift the effective barrier by redistributing the edge dipole through a nonlocal electrostatic response. A continuum free-energy model yields a defect-to-edge kernel whose range is fixed by the semiconductor channel and whose amplitude is fixed by metal-specific edge compliance. Density-functional transport calculations for Ti–MoS2 and Au–MoS2 reproduce the predicted exponential decay of the barrier shift with defect–edge distance and recover metal-dependent swings of hundreds of meV. The same swings cover a substantial fraction of the experimental spread, turning edge-proximal disorder into a first-order design variable for 2D contacts.

Core claim

In top-contacted 2D semiconductors the measured lateral Schottky barrier is a nonlocal edge observable: a remote channel defect couples electrostatically to the contact edge, modulates the edge-lineup offset, and thereby shifts the effective barrier by an amount that decays with defect–edge separation over a channel-determined length while the amplitude of the shift is metal-dependent.

What carries the argument

The defect-to-edge response kernel (Eq. 9 / Eq. 10): ΔΦ_lat_B = χ_e ∫ W(x') s_d(x') dx', with W(x') ∝ exp(-x'/λ_l) and λ_l = √(κ/C_ch). It maps a remote electrostatic source onto the edge-lineup change that defines the barrier.

Load-bearing premise

The barrier shift is assumed to reduce to a linear edge-lineup response obtained from a quadratic free-energy functional whose phenomenological capacitances stay valid even when a charged vacancy sits only a few lattice constants from the metallized edge.

What would settle it

Place controlled sulfur vacancies at known distances from a clean Ti– or Au–MoS2 top-contact edge and measure whether the extracted lateral barrier follows the predicted exponential decay with λ_l ≈ 1.1 nm and the metal-dependent amplitude; a flat or non-exponential distance dependence would falsify the nonlocal kernel.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript argues that the effective Schottky barrier height (SBH) in top-contacted 2D semiconductors is not a purely local interface property but a nonlocal edge observable. Carrier injection is controlled by the lateral band-edge step at the contact edge; a remote channel defect therefore modulates the edge lineup through electrostatic coupling. From a quadratic free-energy functional for the channel potential (Eqs. 5–8), the authors derive a defect-to-edge response kernel whose range λ_l is set by channel electrostatics and whose amplitude is set by metal-specific edge compliance (Eqs. 9–10). DFT–NEGF LDOS calculations for Ti–MoS2 and Au–MoS2 with a single sulfur vacancy placed at separations 0d–10d from the edge yield large, metal-dependent SBH swings that track a common λ_l ≈ 1.1 nm. The authors conclude that this nonlocal mechanism accounts for a substantial fraction of the experimentally reported SBH scatter for the same metal–MoS2 pair.

Significance. If correct, the result reframes a long-standing experimental puzzle—SBH values for nominally identical metal/2D contacts that differ by hundreds of meV—as a mesoscopic electrostatic effect rather than uncontrolled local chemistry alone. The continuum derivation is transparent, the division of roles (channel sets range, contact sets amplitude) is physically clear, and the DFT–NEGF series with controlled defect–edge distance is a concrete, falsifiable test. The work would give device engineers a design handle (edge-proximal defect density and placement) and would push the 2D-contact literature beyond classical local-interface and pinch-off pictures. The shared decay length extracted for two chemically distinct metals is a nontrivial consistency check that strengthens the claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [Eqs. (3)–(5), (9)–(10); Fig. 3(a)] Eqs. (3)–(5) and (9)–(10), Fig. 3(a): The largest SBH swings used to ‘account for a substantial fraction of the experimental spread’ occur at the shortest separations (0d–2d, d = 3.15 Å). At those distances a charged S vacancy hybridizes with metal-induced gap states, screening is nonlinear, and the continuum edge stiffness K_e and linear lineup response ΔJ = χ_e e[u(0)−V_M] are no longer justified. The manuscript must demonstrate that the exponential kernel still describes the data when the near-edge points are excluded or replaced by an independent short-range correction; otherwise the claimed nonlocal electrostatic origin risks being an effective fit to local chemistry.
  2. [Text after Eq. (10); Fig. 3(a) caption] Parameter determination for Fig. 3(a): The functional form of W(x′) is derived independently, yet λ_l, K_e, C_ch and the product χ_e S_d are fine-tuned to the same DFT data set they are said to explain. The paper states that parameters are ‘constrained by established descriptions’ and then ‘fine-tune[d]’. Please report an a-priori parameter set (or a leave-one-metal-out / leave-far-points-out protocol) and quantify how much of the amplitude is predicted versus adjusted. Without that separation the metal-dependent amplitude comparison is circular.
  3. [Computational setup paragraph; Eq. (8)] Computational setup and Eq. (8): Gates and substrates are omitted ‘to isolate intrinsic contact electrostatics’. In real devices the restoring capacitance C_ch (and therefore λ_l) is strongly renormalized by the gate stack and dielectric environment. The manuscript should estimate how λ_l changes under typical back-gate or hBN encapsulation conditions and state whether the nonlocal window remains experimentally relevant; otherwise the claimed unification of experimental SBH scatter is overstated.
  4. [Fig. 3(b) and surrounding text] Fig. 3(b) experimental benchmark: The comparison is qualitative (‘fall within the window’, ‘reproduce a substantial part’). Please tabulate the curated experimental values with extraction method (Arrhenius, temperature-dependent transfer, etc.), contact geometry (top vs edge), and defect/process conditions, and show which fraction of the reported range is actually spanned by the calculated pristine-to-near-edge interval. Without that, the claim that nonlocal electrostatics unifies the longstanding variability remains under-supported.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (2)] Eq. (2): The step function θ(x) and the lineup offset J are introduced without a precise definition of the reference configuration about which the linearization is performed; a short clarifying sentence would help.
  2. [Fig. 2] Fig. 2 caption: Units of κ (aF) and K_e (aF nm−1) are unusual for continuum electrostatics; a conversion to SI or atomic units in the caption would aid reproducibility.
  3. [Fig. 3(d)–(i)] Fig. 3(d)–(i): The black curves that mark the extracted conduction-band edge are hard to distinguish from the LDOS background in grayscale; consider thicker lines or an overlay panel.
  4. [Introduction / closing paragraphs] References: Several key experimental SBH compilations and recent edge-contact / van der Waals contact papers are cited, but a brief note on how the present mechanism differs from classical Tung pinch-off for inhomogeneous barriers would sharpen the novelty claim.
  5. [References] Typographical: ‘Bl”ochl’ and ‘Furthm”uller’ appear with mismatched quotes in the reference list; fix encoding.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Kernel form is independently derived, but λ_l and metal amplitudes are fine-tuned to the same DFT SBH–distance curves that are then called ‘validation’ and used to span the experimental range.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Text after Eq. (10) and Fig. 3(a) caption/discussion]
    "we treat χ_e, K_e, C_ch, ε_∥, and s_d as effective phenomenological parameters constrained by established descriptions of edge-lineup response, channel electrostatics, and defect perturbations, and then fine-tune them to reproduce the calculated trends. [...] Figure 3(a) directly validates the model against first-principles data. The DFT-extracted lateral SBHs for both metals follow the predicted defect-distance dependence over the full range using a common interaction length of λ_l = 1.10 nm."

    λ_l and the metal-dependent prefactors χ_e S_d λ_l/(κ+K_e λ_l) are adjusted so that Eq. (10) matches the DFT SBH-versus-x_d points. The same points are then cited as confirmation that the DFT data follow the model’s ‘predicted’ distance dependence. Once an exponential kernel is assumed, a shared decay length and two amplitudes are guaranteed to fit two decaying curves; the validation is therefore largely by construction of the fit rather than an out-of-sample prediction.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Fig. 3(b) and surrounding text]
    "Figure 3(b) places the calculated variation beside the curated experimental SBH spread. For Ti–MoS2, the reported values fall within the window spanned by the pristine and defect-enhanced results [...] For Au–MoS2, the experimental spread is broader, but the calculations reproduce a substantial part of that range"

    The ‘window spanned by the pristine and defect-enhanced results’ is exactly the range of the parameter-tuned DFT/model curves of Fig. 3(a). Claiming that this fitted span accounts for experimental variability re-uses the same adjusted amplitude and does not constitute an independent prediction of the experimental numbers.

full rationale

The continuum free-energy functional (Eq. 5) and the resulting defect-to-edge kernel (Eqs. 8–10) are derived without reference to the DFT data; the DFT–NEGF LDOS extractions themselves are independent first-principles calculations. The circularity is therefore partial, not total. It arises when the paper treats χ_e, K_e, C_ch, ε_∥ and s_d as free phenomenological parameters, fine-tunes them (including a shared λ_l = 1.1 nm) ‘to reproduce the calculated trends,’ and then presents Fig. 3(a) as direct validation that the DFT points ‘follow the predicted defect-distance dependence.’ Because the exponential envelope and the two metal-specific amplitudes are adjusted to those same points, agreement of shape and of a common decay length is statistically forced once the functional form is assumed. The subsequent claim that the model-plus-DFT span accounts for a substantial fraction of the experimental SBH scatter (Fig. 3b) inherits the same fitted range. Independent content remains: the kernel derivation, the raw DFT variation with defect position, and the consistency check that separately fitted λ_l values for Ti and Au agree to ~2 %. That is enough to keep the score at moderate (5) rather than high circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 3 invented entities

The central claim rests on a continuum electrostatic free-energy model whose parameters are partly taken from literature scales and partly fine-tuned to the paper’s own DFT, plus the modeling choice that the measurable barrier is purely the lateral edge step. No new particles or forces are invented, but several effective response functions are introduced and calibrated inside the paper.

free parameters (5)
  • λ_l (defect–edge interaction length) = 1.1 nm
    Shared value 1.1 nm extracted/fine-tuned so that both Ti and Au DFT curves collapse onto the model exponential; independent free fits give 1.12±0.09 nm and 1.09±0.07 nm.
  • K_e (edge stiffness) = 0.047 aF nm^{-1}
    Phenomenological edge restoring force; set to 0.047 aF nm^{-1} to match DFT amplitude and stated to be consistent with partial pinning literature.
  • C_ch (channel restoring capacitance) = 3.1 μF cm^{-2}
    Obtained from κ/λ_l^{2} after λ_l is chosen; numerical value 3.1 μF cm^{-2} is then compared to MoS2 transistor capacitances.
  • χ_e S_d (edge susceptibility × defect charge product) = 4.0e-7 eV μF cm^{-1}
    Overall amplitude prefactor fine-tuned to 4.0×10^{-7} eV μF cm^{-1} so that model curves overlie DFT SBH shifts.
  • κ (in-plane electrostatic stiffness) = 0.037 aF
    Set to 0.037 aF from ε_∥ t with ε_∥ and t chosen from MoS2 literature then held fixed while other parameters are adjusted.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The measurable lateral SBH is exactly the conduction-band step Φ_lat_B = E_C^ch(0+) − E_C^cov(0−) and any continuous electrostatic potential cancels, leaving only the edge-lineup offset J.
    Stated after Eq. 1 and used to reduce ΔΦ_lat_B = ΔJ; standard for lateral 2D contacts but neglects residual vertical barriers under Au.
  • domain assumption Edge-lineup response is linear: ΔJ = χ_e e [u(0) − V_M].
    Eq. 4; linearization about a reference contact; stronger short-range or nonlinear effects are absorbed into effective parameters.
  • ad hoc to paper Electrostatics of the uncovered channel is captured by the quadratic free-energy functional containing κ(∂_x u)^2, C_ch u^2 and local edge stiffness K_e u(0)^2.
    Eq. 5; continuum approximation whose validity near an atomic-scale vacancy and metallized edge is not independently verified.
  • domain assumption A single sulfur vacancy can be represented as a point source S_d δ(x − x_d) whose only effect is electrostatic.
    Used to obtain Eq. 10; chemical reconstruction or mid-gap states that alter the local density of states beyond electrostatics are neglected.
  • domain assumption PBE DFT–NEGF with the stated basis and cutoffs yields reliable conduction-band edge positions for SBH extraction.
    Computational methods section; known band-gap underestimation of PBE is assumed not to distort relative edge shifts.
invented entities (3)
  • defect-to-edge response kernel W(x′) no independent evidence
    purpose: Maps a remote electrostatic source in the channel onto the potential shift at the contact edge (Eq. 8).
    Derived from the free-energy functional; not a previously named object in the 2D-contact literature.
  • edge-lineup susceptibility χ_e no independent evidence
    purpose: Converts an edge-potential shift into a change of the Schottky lineup offset.
    Introduced in Eq. 4 as a linear-response coefficient; calibrated inside the paper.
  • edge stiffness K_e no independent evidence
    purpose: Local restoring force that determines how efficiently an incoming channel field modulates the edge potential.
    Appears in the free-energy boundary condition; numerical value fitted to DFT.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 13588 in / 3887 out tokens · 47658 ms · 2026-07-10T10:34:09.660534+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Electrical contacts often limit the performance of atomically thin semiconductor devices. The Schottky barrier height (SBH) is conventionally treated as a local interface property, yet reported values for the same metal/2D-semiconductor contact vary by hundreds of meV. Here we show that, in top contacts, the effective SBH exhibits a pronounced nonlocal electrostatic dependence on defects near the contact edge, beyond the conventional local interface framework. A nonlocal electrostatic model, supported by density-functional-theory-based transport calculations for Ti--MoS$_2$ and Au--MoS$_2$, captures the large, metal-dependent variations in SBH as a function of defect position relative to the contact edge. These results provide a unified explanation for the longstanding variability in experimentally extracted SBHs and establish nonlocal electrostatics, mediated by edge-proximal defects, as a key mechanism governing carrier injection in 2D contacts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08253 by Hangbo Zhou, Yong-Wei Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic of the nonlocal electro￾static mechanism in a top-contacted metal– semiconductor junction. A defect in the un￾covered channel acts as a remote electrostatic source, and its perturbation propagates toward the contact edge. There it redistributes the edge dipole and modulates the local potential lineup, thereby changing the edge-controlled Schottky barrier height. The inset shows the resulting shif… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Representative parameter depen￾dence of the nonlocal barrier shift predicted by Eq. (10). Panel (a) uses ε∥ = 7, t = 0.6 nm, λl = 1.1 nm, κ = ϵ0ε∥t = 0.037 aF, Cch = κ/λ2 l = 3.1 µF cm−2 , Ke = 0.047 aF nm−1 , and χeSd = 4.0×10−7 eV µF cm−1 . In (a), ∆Φlat B (xd) is shown for fixed Ke = 0.047 aF nm−1 and ε∥ = 3, 7, 15. In (b), ∆Φmax B is shown as a function of Ke for the same ε∥. The adopted ε∥ and t are c… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) DFT-extracted lateral SBH versus defect–edge distance with electrostatic model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Li et al

    author author W. Li et al. ,\ title title Approaching the quantum limit in two-dimensional semiconductor contacts ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05431-4 journal journal Nature \ volume 613 ,\ pages 274 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05431-4 2023

  2. [2]

    \ Shen et al

    author author P.-C. \ Shen et al. ,\ title title Ultralow contact resistance between semimetal and monolayer semiconductors ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03472-9 journal journal Nature \ volume 593 ,\ pages 211 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03472-9 2021

  3. [3]

    Liu et al

    author author Y. Liu et al. ,\ title title Promises and prospects of two-dimensional transistors ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03339-z journal journal Nature \ volume 591 ,\ pages 43 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03339-z 2021

  4. [4]

    Allain , author J

    author author A. Allain , author J. Kang , author K. Banerjee ,\ and\ author A. Kis ,\ title title Electrical contacts to two-dimensional semiconductors ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4452 journal journal Nat. Mater. \ volume 14 ,\ pages 1195 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat4452 2015

  5. [5]

    author author K. F. \ Mak , author C. Lee , author J. Hone , author J. Shan ,\ and\ author T. F. \ Heinz ,\ title title Atomically Thin MoS _2 : A New Direct-Gap Semiconductor ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.136805 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 105 ,\ pages 136805 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.136805 2010

  6. [6]

    author author Q. H. \ Wang , author K. Kalantar-Zadeh , author A. Kis , author J. N. \ Coleman ,\ and\ author M. S. \ Strano ,\ title title Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.193 journal journal Nat. Nanotechnol. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 699 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.193 2012

  7. [7]

    Wang et al

    author author Y. Wang et al. ,\ title title Schottky barrier heights in two-dimensional field-effect transistors: from theory to experiment ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/abf1d4 journal journal Rep. Prog. Phys. \ volume 84 ,\ pages 056501 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/abf1d4 2021

  8. [8]

    Liu et al

    author author Y. Liu et al. ,\ title title Approaching the Schottky--Mott limit in van der Waals metal--semiconductor junctions ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0129-8 journal journal Nature \ volume 557 ,\ pages 696 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0129-8 2018

  9. [9]

    Wang et al

    author author Y. Wang et al. ,\ title title Van der Waals contacts between three-dimensional metals and two-dimensional semiconductors ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1052-3 journal journal Nature \ volume 568 ,\ pages 70 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1052-3 2019

  10. [10]

    Zheng et al

    author author X. Zheng et al. ,\ title title Patterning metal contacts on monolayer MoS _2 with vanishing Schottky barriers using thermal nanolithography ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-018-0191-0 journal journal Nat. Electron. \ volume 2 ,\ pages 17 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s41928-018-0191-0 2019

  11. [11]

    Song et al

    author author S. Song et al. ,\ title title Wafer-scale production of patterned transition metal ditelluride layers for two-dimensional metal--semiconductor contacts at the Schottky--Mott limit ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-020-0396-x journal journal Nat. Electron. \ volume 3 ,\ pages 207 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s41928-020-0396-x 2020

  12. [12]

    Wang et al

    author author Y. Wang et al. ,\ title title P-type electrical contacts for 2D transition-metal dichalcogenides ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05134-w journal journal Nature \ volume 610 ,\ pages 61 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05134-w 2022

  13. [13]

    Qiu et al

    author author H. Qiu et al. ,\ title title Electrical characterization of back-gated bi-layer MoS _2 field-effect transistors and the effect of ambient on their performances ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3696045 journal journal Appl. Phys. Lett. \ volume 100 ,\ pages 123104 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3696045 2012

  14. [14]

    Das , author H.-Y

    author author S. Das , author H.-Y. \ Chen , author A. V. \ Penumatcha ,\ and\ author J. Appenzeller ,\ title title High Performance Multilayer MoS _2 Transistors with Scandium Contacts ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/nl303583v journal journal Nano Lett. \ volume 13 ,\ pages 100 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/nl303583v 2013

  15. [15]

    Kaushik et al

    author author N. Kaushik et al. ,\ title title Schottky barrier heights for Au and Pd contacts to MoS _2 ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4895767 journal journal Appl. Phys. Lett. \ volume 105 ,\ pages 113505 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4895767 2014

  16. [16]

    author author J. Y. \ Kwak et al. ,\ title title Electrical Characteristics of Multilayer MoS _2 FET's with MoS _2 /Graphene Heterojunction Contacts ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/nl5015316 journal journal Nano Lett. \ volume 14 ,\ pages 4511 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/nl5015316 2014

  17. [17]

    Kim et al

    author author C. Kim et al. ,\ title title Fermi Level Pinning at Electrical Metal Contacts of Monolayer Molybdenum Dichalcogenides ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b07159 journal journal ACS Nano \ volume 11 ,\ pages 1588 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b07159 2017

  18. [18]

    Li et al

    author author M. Li et al. ,\ title title Influence of MoS _2 -metal interface on charge injection: a comparison between various metal contacts ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ab9cf6 journal journal Nanotechnology \ volume 31 ,\ pages 395713 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6528/ab9cf6 2020

  19. [19]

    Xie et al

    author author J. Xie et al. ,\ title title Analysis of Schottky barrier heights and reduced Fermi-level pinning in monolayer CVD-grown MoS _2 field-effect-transistors ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ac55d2 journal journal Nanotechnology \ volume 33 ,\ pages 225702 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6528/ac55d2 2022

  20. [20]

    author author R. T. \ Tung ,\ title title Chemical Bonding and Fermi Level Pinning at Metal-Semiconductor Interfaces ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.6078 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 84 ,\ pages 6078 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.6078 2000

  21. [21]

    Gong , author L

    author author C. Gong , author L. Colombo , author R. M. \ Wallace ,\ and\ author K. Cho ,\ title title The Unusual Mechanism of Partial Fermi Level Pinning at Metal--MoS _2 Interfaces ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/nl403465v journal journal Nano Lett. \ volume 14 ,\ pages 1714 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/nl403465v 2014

  22. [22]

    Sorkin , author H

    author author V. Sorkin , author H. Zhou , author Z. G. \ Yu , author K.-W. \ Ang ,\ and\ author Y.-W. \ Zhang ,\ title title The effects of point defect type, location, and density on the Schottky barrier height of Au/MoS _2 heterojunction: a first-principles study ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22913-7 journal journal Sci. Rep. \ volume 12 ,\ pag...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-022-22913-7 2022

  23. [23]

    Sorkin , author H

    author author V. Sorkin , author H. Zhou , author Z. G. \ Yu , author K.-W. \ Ang ,\ and\ author Y.-W. \ Zhang ,\ title title Impact of grain boundaries on the electronic properties and Schottky barrier height in MoS _2 @Au heterojunctions ,\ https://doi.org/10.1039/D4CP03686G journal journal Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. \ volume 27 ,\ pages 905 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1039/d4cp03686g 2025

  24. [24]

    author author R. T. \ Tung ,\ title title Formation of an electric dipole at metal-semiconductor interfaces ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.64.205310 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 64 ,\ pages 205310 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.64.205310 2001

  25. [25]

    author author R. T. \ Tung ,\ title title Electron transport of inhomogeneous Schottky barriers ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.104747 journal journal Appl. Phys. Lett. \ volume 58 ,\ pages 2821 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.104747 1991

  26. [26]

    Wang et al

    author author L. Wang et al. ,\ title title One-Dimensional Electrical Contact to a Two-Dimensional Material ,\ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1244358 journal journal Science \ volume 342 ,\ pages 614 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1244358 2013

  27. [27]

    Leonard \ and\ author J

    author author F. Leonard \ and\ author J. Tersoff ,\ title title Role of Fermi-Level Pinning in Nanotube Schottky Diodes ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4693 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 84 ,\ pages 4693 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.4693 2000

  28. [28]

    Refaely-Abramson , author D

    author author S. Refaely-Abramson , author D. Y. \ Qiu , author S. G. \ Louie ,\ and\ author J. B. \ Neaton ,\ title title Defect-Induced Modification of Low-Lying Excitons and Valley Selectivity in Monolayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.167402 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 121 ,\ pages 167402 ( y...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.167402 2018

  29. [29]

    Schuler et al

    author author B. Schuler et al. ,\ title title Large Spin-Orbit Splitting of Deep In-Gap Defect States of Engineered Sulfur Vacancies in Monolayer WS _2 ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.076801 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 123 ,\ pages 076801 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.076801 2019

  30. [30]

    Krause et al

    author author R. Krause et al. ,\ title title Microscopic Understanding of Ultrafast Charge Transfer in van der Waals Heterostructures ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.276401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 127 ,\ pages 276401 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.276401 2021

  31. [31]

    Bobzien et al

    author author L. Bobzien et al. ,\ title title Layer-Dependent Charge-State Lifetime of Single Se Vacancies in WSe _2 ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.076201 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 134 ,\ pages 076201 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.076201 2025

  32. [32]

    author author R. T. \ Tung ,\ title title The physics and chemistry of the Schottky barrier height ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4858400 journal journal Appl. Phys. Rev. \ volume 1 ,\ pages 011304 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4858400 2014

  33. [33]

    author author T. C. \ Berkelbach , author M. S. \ Hybertsen ,\ and\ author D. R. \ Reichman ,\ title title Theory of neutral and charged excitons in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.045318 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 88 ,\ pages 045318 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.045318 2013

  34. [34]

    author author R. K. \ Bennett , author K. Shen , author T. A. \ Meyer ,\ and\ author E. Pop ,\ title title How Do Quantum Effects Influence the Capacitance and Carrier Density of Monolayer MoS _2 Transistors? ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c03913 journal journal Nano Lett. \ volume 23 ,\ pages 1666 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c03913 2023

  35. [35]

    Chu , author H

    author author L. Chu , author H. Schmidt , author J. Pu , author S. Wang , author B. Ozyilmaz , author T. Takenobu ,\ and\ author G. Eda ,\ title title Charge transport in ion-gated mono-, bi- and trilayer MoS _2 field effect transistors ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07293 journal journal Sci. Rep. \ volume 4 ,\ pages 7293 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/srep07293 2014

  36. [36]

    Velicky , author M

    author author M. Velicky , author M. A. \ Bissett , author C. R. \ Woods , author P. S. \ Toth , author T. Georgiou , author I. A. \ Kinloch , author K. S. \ Novoselov ,\ and\ author R. A. W. \ Dryfe ,\ title title Photoelectrochemistry of Pristine Mono- and Few-Layer MoS _2 ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b05317 journal journal Nano Lett. \ volu...

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b05317 2023

  37. [37]

    Bampoulis , author R

    author author P. Bampoulis , author R. van Bremen , author Q. Yao , author B. Poelsema , author H. J. W. \ Zandvliet ,\ and\ author K. Sotthewes ,\ title title Defect Dominated Charge Transport and Fermi Level Pinning in MoS _2 /Metal Contacts ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b02739 journal journal ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces \ volume 9 ,\ pages 19278 (...

    work page doi:10.1021/acsami.7b02739 2017

  38. [38]

    Zhang , author Y

    author author Z. Zhang , author Y. Guo ,\ and\ author J. Robertson ,\ title title Reduced Fermi Level Pinning at Physisorptive Sites of Moire-MoS _2 /Metal Schottky Barriers ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c23918 journal journal ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces \ volume 14 ,\ pages 11903 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acsami.1c23918 2022

  39. [39]

    Laturia , author M

    author author A. Laturia , author M. L. \ Van de Put ,\ and\ author W. G. \ Vandenberghe ,\ title title Dielectric properties of hexagonal boron nitride and transition metal dichalcogenides: from monolayer to bulk ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41699-018-0050-x journal journal npj 2D Mater. Appl. \ volume 2 ,\ pages 6 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s41699-018-0050-x 2018

  40. [40]

    Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set.Phys

    author author G. Kresse \ and\ author J. Furthm "u ller ,\ title title Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 54 ,\ pages 11169 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.11169 1996

  41. [41]

    author author P. E. \ Bl "o chl ,\ title title Projector augmented-wave method ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 50 ,\ pages 17953 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.50.17953 1994

  42. [42]

    Taylor , author H

    author author J. Taylor , author H. Guo ,\ and\ author J. Wang ,\ title title Ab initio modeling of quantum transport properties of molecular electronic devices ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.63.245407 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 63 ,\ pages 245407 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.63.245407 2001

  43. [43]

    author author J. P. \ Perdew , author K. Burke ,\ and\ author M. Ernzerhof ,\ title title Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 77 ,\ pages 3865 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 1996

  44. [44]

    Pan et al

    author author Y. Pan et al. ,\ title title Reexamination of the Schottky Barrier Heights in Monolayer MoS _2 Field-Effect Transistors ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.9b00200 journal journal ACS Appl. Nano Mater. \ volume 2 ,\ pages 4717 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acsanm.9b00200 2019