Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 52 references

Chaplygin and Polytropic Kantowski--Sachs Solutions in Teleparallel $F(T)$ Gravity

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-14 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Nonlinear fluid conservation laws reconstruct teleparallel F(T) for Kantowski–Sachs geometries without prescribing the Lagrangian first.

desk verdict Clean local inverse-reconstruction catalogue for Chaplygin/polytropic KS sources in covariant F(T); solid algebra, openly local, no hidden circularity. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.08343 v2 pith:3UULUDKB submitted 2026-07-09 gr-qc hep-thmath-phmath.MP

Alexandre Landry This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords teleparallelF(T)gravityKantowski–SachsChaplygingaspolytropicfluidsreconstructionmethodanisotropiccosmologycoframe–spin-connectioninvariantclassification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper shows how to recover the gravitational function F(T) in teleparallel gravity for anisotropic Kantowski–Sachs spacetimes filled with Chaplygin-type or polytropic fluids. Instead of choosing F(T) in advance, the nonlinear equation of state first fixes how density depends on the anisotropic volume V = A2 A3²; that source scaling is then fed into the reduced covariant field equations to produce F(T). Power-law and exponential scale-factor ansätze yield explicit reconstruction branches: dust-like early-volume powers, constant-plus-power late-volume terms for Chaplygin gases, and polytropic powers controlled by the index Γ. Exponential branches with growing angular scale factors approach a constant-torsion teleparallel de Sitter background, while contracting angular factors give local black-hole-interior-like sectors. The analysis is local and branch-dependent; only leading viability conditions FT > 0 and FTT > 0 are checked, with full stability left open.

What carries the argument

The reduced reconstruction relation that equates the logarithmic time derivative of FT to the fluid combination κ(ρ + p) plus a purely geometric difference Grp, once ρ(V) has been fixed by the nonlinear conservation law and a power-law or exponential KS ansatz has inverted V into T or X = T0 − T.

What would settle it

Compute linear perturbations of both independent KS scale factors plus the fluid variables around any reconstructed power-law or shifted-power branch; if the scalar-torsion modes are ghosts or tachyons throughout the parameter region required by positive density and FT > 0, the claimed leading-order viability fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Conservation laws for generalized Chaplygin gases (p = −A/ρα) and polytropic fluids (p = KρΓ) determine ρ as a function of the Kantowski–Sachs volume. Inserting those density scalings into the symmetric teleparallel field equations reconstructs local F(T) branches—powers of T in the power-law sector and powers of the shifted invariant X = T0 − T in the exponential sector—driven entirely by the matter sector rather than by a pre-chosen gravitational Lagrangian.

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes that simple power-law or exponential forms for the two independent scale factors are general enough local branches that the resulting Euler equations capture the physically relevant reconstruction sectors.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Each nonlinear equation of state imprints a distinct power (or constant-plus-power) signature on the reconstructed F(T).
  • Exponential branches with positive angular expansion approach a constant-torsion teleparallel de Sitter background selected by the KS geometry itself.
  • Contracting angular scale factors produce local high-torsion KS interior-like reconstruction sectors.
  • Generalized, modified Chaplygin, polytropic and barotropic fluids sit inside one unified invariant reconstruction scheme.
  • Leading viability (FT > 0, FTT > 0) can be read off algebraically for each reconstructed power or shifted-power correction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Any equation of state whose conservation law integrates in the KS volume should generate a corresponding family of local teleparallel Lagrangians by the same inverse route.
  • Matching the contracting-angular branches to exterior spherically symmetric teleparallel solutions could yield complete black-hole models with nonlinear fluid interiors.
  • Observational bounds on Chaplygin or polytropic parameters would translate directly into bounds on admissible exponents in the reconstructed F(T).
  • Repeating the reconstruction in F(T,B) or New General Relativity would test how sensitive the branches are to the choice of torsional invariant.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a local covariant reconstruction of F(T) for Kantowski–Sachs geometries sourced by generalized/modified Chaplygin gases and polytropic fluids in the coframe–spin-connection formulation of teleparallel gravity. Nonlinear conservation laws first fix ρ as a function of the anisotropic volume V = A₂ A₃² (Eqs. 25, 32, 35). Power-law (with the analytic restriction c = 1) and exponential ansätze then invert V into T or the shifted invariant X = T₀ − T, converting the reduced reconstruction relation (Eq. 20) into Euler ODEs (Eqs. 49, 68) whose particular solutions yield explicit local F(T) branches (Tables II–III). The resulting sectors are interpreted as anisotropic cosmologies or, for contracting angular scale factors, as local KS black-hole-interior branches; leading-order viability is checked via F_T > 0 and F_TT > 0, with full stability deferred.

Significance. If the local branches are accepted as stated, the work supplies a clean inverse-reconstruction pipeline that lets nonlinear equations of state dictate admissible F(T) sectors rather than the reverse. The CSC/invariant framing keeps the construction covariant, the conservation-law integrations are elementary and inspectable, and the explicit power-law and shifted-X particular solutions (including resonance caveats) give concrete, falsifiable local models that extend the author’s earlier electromagnetic KS reconstruction. The contribution is therefore a useful methodological addition to anisotropic teleparallel reconstruction, even though it remains deliberately local and branch-dependent.

major comments (2)
  1. Sections IV–V and Eqs. (49), (68): the geometric coefficients γ₀, γ₁ (and Γ₀, Γ₁) that define the Euler operators are left entirely schematic. Because the particular-solution denominators and the homogeneous exponents m_i, μ_i depend on these coefficients, the reconstructed F(T) expressions remain formal until the coefficients are evaluated for the chosen KS ansätze. An explicit computation (or a short appendix) is needed for the central claim of “explicit” reconstruction branches to be fully checkable.
  2. Section IV.A, Eq. (43): the restriction c = 1 is introduced solely for analytic invertibility of T(t). While the paper correctly labels the resulting branches as local, the claim that these branches capture the “relevant” reconstruction sectors would be strengthened by a brief discussion of the generic c ≠ 1 case (or an argument that the leading source powers survive). Without that, the power-law sector is narrower than the abstract suggests.
minor comments (4)
  1. Table I and the surrounding text: the sound-speed formulae are listed as “necessary local consistency conditions,” yet they are never used again. A one-sentence cross-reference in Section VII would clarify their role.
  2. Eq. (20): the geometric remainder G_rp is defined only verbally. A short explicit expression in terms of A₂, A₃ (even if later specialized) would improve readability.
  3. Section VI: the teleparallel de Sitter existence condition (Eq. 80) is stated but not checked against any of the reconstructed particular solutions; a single illustrative substitution would make the interpretation more concrete.
  4. References: a few recent KS/f(T) or f(Q) papers already cited in the introduction could be cross-linked more tightly to the reconstruction tables for readers coming from the dynamical-systems literature.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: nonlinear conservation laws fix ρ(V) independently of F(T), and F is then reconstructed from the reduced field equations under disclosed local KS ansätze.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section II.C, Eqs. (16)–(18) and surrounding text; also Introduction and Ref. [47]]
    "These equations follow directly from the covariant coframe variation after specialization to the KS CSC branch and coincide with the equations derived in Ref. [47] in the appropriate limit. ... The present work extends the recent covariant electromagnetic KS reconstruction program to nonlinear perfect-fluid sources [47]."

    The reduced KS field equations and CSC branch are imported from the author's own prior electromagnetic KS paper rather than re-derived in full. This is ordinary framework reuse and is not load-bearing for the new claim: once the equations are granted, the Chaplygin/polytropic ρ(V) scalings and the resulting F(T) particular solutions are independent of that citation. No uniqueness theorem or fitted parameter is smuggled in.

full rationale

The paper's central inverse-reconstruction claim is self-contained and inspectable. Minimally coupled matter conservation (Eqs. 21–23) determines ρ(V) solely from the nonlinear equation of state (Chaplygin, modified Chaplygin, polytropic, barotropic), independent of F(T). Power-law and exponential KS ansätze then invert V into T or the shifted invariant X = T0 − T (Eqs. 45, 66), converting the reduced reconstruction relation (Eq. 20) into Euler ODEs (Eqs. 49, 68) whose particular solutions yield explicit F branches. Self-citations to the author's prior CSC/KS and electromagnetic papers supply the geometric setup and the reduced field equations, but do not force the functional form of F; that form is driven by the fluid source scalings. No parameters are fitted to data and then re-presented as predictions. The ansätze and the restriction c = 1 are openly local branch choices, not uniqueness theorems smuggled in as external facts. Leading-order viability conditions FT > 0, FTT > 0 are necessary diagnostics, not circular self-definitions. Score 1 reflects only routine, non-load-bearing self-citation of the geometric framework.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard covariant teleparallel field equations, the KS coframe–spin-connection branch already classified in prior work, the minimal-coupling conservation law, and two families of local scale-factor ansätze chosen for analytic invertibility. No new free parameters are fitted to data; the fluid constants A, B, K, Γ, C and the geometric exponents b, c remain free labels of each local branch. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • Chaplygin parameters A, B, α (and C for modified Chaplygin)
    Integration constants and equation-of-state parameters that label each fluid branch; not fitted to observations in this work.
  • Polytropic parameters K, Γ (or n)
    Equation-of-state constants that control the density power; free labels of each reconstruction sector.
  • KS exponents b, c and prefactors b₀, c₀
    Chosen by hand to define the local power-law or exponential ansatz; c = 1 is further imposed for analytic invertibility of T(t).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Covariant teleparallel F(T) field equations (symmetric and antisymmetric parts) derived from the coframe–spin-connection action
    Taken as standard from the teleparallel literature (Krššák et al., Cai et al.); used throughout Sections II–V.
  • domain assumption Minimally coupled perfect-fluid conservation law reduces to dρ/d ln V = −(ρ + p) on the KS background
    Follows from diffeomorphism invariance of the matter action; stated in Section III.
  • ad hoc to paper Power-law (A₂ ∝ t^b, A₃ ∝ t^c with c = 1) and exponential (A₂ ∝ e^{bt}, A₃ ∝ e^{ct}) ansätze define the relevant local reconstruction branches
    Chosen for analytic invertibility of T(t) or X(t); introduced in Sections IV.A and V.A without derivation from a more general solution.
  • domain assumption Leading-order viability conditions F_T > 0 and F_TT > 0 are necessary (though not sufficient) for the reconstructed branches
    Standard diagnostic in the F(T) literature; applied in Section VII.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chaplygin and Polytropic Kantowski--Sachs Solutions in Teleparallel $F(T)$ Gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3UULUDKB

@misc{pith2026260708343,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chaplygin and Polytropic Kantowski--Sachs Solutions in Teleparallel $F(T)$ Gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3UULUDKB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.08343}
}
abstract

A covariant reconstruction framework for Kantowski--Sachs (KS) geometries sourced by Chaplygin-type and polytropic fluids in teleparallel $F(T)$ gravity is developed using the coframe--spin-connection formalism and the teleparallel invariant approach. The matter sector is modelled by nonlinear equations of state, including the generalized Chaplygin gas $p=-A/\rho^{\alpha}$ and a polytropic law $p=K\rho^{\Gamma}$. The corresponding conservation laws determine the dependence of the fluid density on the anisotropic KS volume $V=A_2A_3^2$. These source scalings are then inserted into the symmetric part of the covariant teleparallel field equations and used to reconstruct the functional form of $F(T)$ directly from the KS dynamics. Power-law and exponential ans\"atze generate distinct invariant reconstruction branches. In the power-law sector, the Chaplygin fluid produces mixed constant-plus-power source terms, while the polytropic sector generates density powers controlled by the polytropic index. In the exponential sector, the natural reconstruction variable is the shifted invariant $X=T_0-T$, leading to shifted teleparallel de Sitter branches. The reconstructed models are interpreted as local anisotropic cosmological sectors and, for contracting angular KS scale factors, as local Kantowski--Sachs black-hole-interior reconstruction branches. The analysis is local and branch-dependent; leading-order viability is assessed through \(F_T>0\) and \(F_{TT}>0\), while a complete perturbative stability analysis is left for future work. The reconstruction is entirely driven by nonlinear matter conservation laws, thereby reversing the standard reconstruction strategy in which the gravitational Lagrangian is prescribed a priori.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    1 A2 3 + 2 ˙A2 A2 ˙A3 A3 + ˙A2 3 A2 3 # ,(16) −κpr = 1 2 (F−T F T )−2F T T ˙T ˙A3 A3 −F T

    These source scalings are then inserted into the symmetric part of the covariant teleparallel field equations and used to reconstruct the functional form ofF(T)directly from the KS dynamics. Power-law and exponential ansätze generate distinct invariant reconstruction branches. In the power-law sector, the Chaplygin fluid produces mixed constant-plus-power...

    arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Aldrovandi, R.; Pereira, J.G.Teleparallel Gravity: An Introduction; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013

    2013

  3. [3]

    The covariant formulation off(T)gravity.Class

    Krššák, M.; Saridakis, E.N. The covariant formulation off(T)gravity.Class. Quantum Gravity2016,33, 115009

  4. [4]

    Cai, Y.-F.; Capozziello, S.; De Laurentis, M.; Saridakis, E.N.f(T)teleparallel gravity and cosmology.Rep. Prog. Phys. 2016,79, 106901

    2016

  5. [5]

    Teleparallel gravity: From theory to cosmology.Rep

    Bahamonde, S.; Dialektopoulos, K.F.; Escamilla-Rivera, C.; Farrugia, G.; Gakis, V.; Hendry, M.; Hohmann, M.; Levi Said, J.; Mifsud, J.; Di Valentino, E. Teleparallel gravity: From theory to cosmology.Rep. Prog. Phys.2023,86, 026901

    2023

  6. [6]

    Spin connection and renormalization of teleparallel action.Eur

    Krššák, M.; Pereira, J.G. Spin connection and renormalization of teleparallel action.Eur. Phys. J. C2015,75, 519

  7. [7]

    On the covariance of teleparallel gravity theories.Class

    Golovnev, A.; Koivisto, T.; Sandstad, M. On the covariance of teleparallel gravity theories.Class. Quantum Gravity2017, 34, 145013

  8. [8]

    Teleparallel theories of gravity: Illuminating a fully invariant approach.Class

    Krššák, M.; van den Hoogen, R.J.; Pereira, J.G.; Böhmer, C.G.; Coley, A.A. Teleparallel theories of gravity: Illuminating a fully invariant approach.Class. Quantum Gravity2019,36, 183001

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Modified teleparallel gravity: Inflation without an inflaton.Phys

    Ferraro, R.; Fiorini, F. Modified teleparallel gravity: Inflation without an inflaton.Phys. Rev. D2007,75, 084031

  2. [10]

    Extended theories of gravity.Phys

    Capozziello, S.; De Laurentis, M. Extended theories of gravity.Phys. Rep.2011,509, 167–321

    2011

  3. [11]

    Symmetry and equivalence in teleparallel gravity.J

    Coley, A.A.; van den Hoogen, R.J.; McNutt, D.D. Symmetry and equivalence in teleparallel gravity.J. Math. Phys.2020, 61, 072503

    2020

  4. [12]

    Spherically symmetric teleparallel geometries.Eur

    Coley, A.A.; Landry, A.; van den Hoogen, R.J.; McNutt, D.D. Spherically symmetric teleparallel geometries.Eur. Phys. J. C2024,84, 334

  5. [13]

    Kantowski–Sachs spherically symmetric solutions in teleparallelF(T)gravity.Symmetry2024,16, 953

    Landry, A. Kantowski–Sachs spherically symmetric solutions in teleparallelF(T)gravity.Symmetry2024,16, 953

  6. [14]

    Some spatially homogeneous anisotropic relativistic cosmological models.J

    Kantowski, R.; Sachs, R.K. Some spatially homogeneous anisotropic relativistic cosmological models.J. Math. Phys.1966, 7, 443–446

    1966

  7. [15]

    Ryan, M.P.; Shepley, L.C.Homogeneous Relativistic Cosmologies; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1975

    1975

  8. [16]

    A class of homogeneous cosmological models.Commun

    Ellis, G.F.R.; MacCallum, M.A.H. A class of homogeneous cosmological models.Commun. Math. Phys.1969,12, 108–141

    1969

  9. [17]

    Hawking, S.W.; Ellis, G.F.R.The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1973

    1973

  10. [18]

    Stephani, H.; Kramer, D.; MacCallum, M.; Hoenselaers, C.; Herlt, E.Exact Solutions of Einstein’s Field Equations, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2003

    2003

  11. [19]

    Anisotropic universe models inf(T)gravity.Astrophys

    Rodrigues, M.E.; Houndjo, M.J.S.; Tossa, J.; Myrzakulov, R. Anisotropic universe models inf(T)gravity.Astrophys. Space Sci.2015,357, 129

    2015

  12. [20]

    Phase-space analysis of Kantowski–Sachs cosmologies.J

    León, G.; Roque, A.A. Phase-space analysis of Kantowski–Sachs cosmologies.J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2014,05, 032. 14

    2014

  13. [21]

    Kantowski–Sachs cosmologies in modified gravity.Eur

    Dimakis, N.; Paliathanasis, A.; Christodoulakis, T. Kantowski–Sachs cosmologies in modified gravity.Eur. Phys. J. C 2023,83, 794

    2023

  14. [22]

    Kantowski– Sachs and Bianchi III dynamics inf(Q)gravity.Phys

    Millano, A.D.; Dialektopoulos, K.F.; Dimakis, N.; Giacomini, A.; Shababi, H.; Halder, A.; Paliathanasis, A. Kantowski– Sachs and Bianchi III dynamics inf(Q)gravity.Phys. Rev. D2024,109, 124044

  15. [23]

    Teleparallel geometry with spherical symmetry: The diagonal and proper frames.J

    van den Hoogen, R.J.; Forance, H. Teleparallel geometry with spherical symmetry: The diagonal and proper frames.J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2024,11, 033

    2024

  16. [24]

    Dynamics of dark energy.Int

    Copeland, E.J.; Sami, M.; Tsujikawa, S. Dynamics of dark energy.Int. J. Mod. Phys. D2006,15, 1753–1936

    1936

  17. [25]

    Dark energy cosmology: The equivalent description via different theoretical models.Astrophys

    Bamba, K.; Capozziello, S.; Nojiri, S.; Odintsov, S.D. Dark energy cosmology: The equivalent description via different theoretical models.Astrophys. Space Sci.2012,342, 155–228

    2012

  18. [26]

    Unified cosmic history in modified gravity.Phys

    Nojiri, S.; Odintsov, S.D. Unified cosmic history in modified gravity.Phys. Rep.2011,505, 59–144

    2011

  19. [27]

    Harko, T.; Lobo, F.S.N.f(R, Lm)gravity.Eur. Phys. J. C2010,70, 373–379

  20. [28]

    Dark energy and the accelerating universe.Annu

    Frieman, J.A.; Turner, M.S.; Huterer, D. Dark energy and the accelerating universe.Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.2008, 46, 385–432

    2008

  21. [29]

    An alternative to quintessence.Phys

    Kamenshchik, A.; Moschella, U.; Pasquier, V. An alternative to quintessence.Phys. Lett. B2001,511, 265–268

  22. [30]

    Generalized Chaplygin gas, accelerated expansion, and dark-energy–matter unifi- cation.Phys

    Bento, M.C.; Bertolami, O.; Sen, A.A. Generalized Chaplygin gas, accelerated expansion, and dark-energy–matter unifi- cation.Phys. Rev. D2002,66, 043507

  23. [31]

    Unification of dark matter and dark energy: The inhomogeneous Chaplygin gas

    Bilić, N.; Tupper, G.B.; Viollier, R.D. Unification of dark matter and dark energy: The inhomogeneous Chaplygin gas. Phys. Lett. B2002,535, 17–21

  24. [32]

    The Chaplygin gas as a model for dark energy

    Gorini, V.; Kamenshchik, A.; Moschella, U.; Pasquier, V. The Chaplygin gas as a model for dark energy. InProceedings of the Tenth Marcel Grossmann Meeting; World Scientific: Singapore, 2003

    2003

  25. [33]

    The generalized Chaplygin gas model: A short review.AIP Conf

    Bouhmadi-López, M. The generalized Chaplygin gas model: A short review.AIP Conf. Proc.2009,1115, 160–166

    2009

  26. [34]

    Role of modified Chaplygin gas in accelerated universe.Class

    Debnath, U.; Banerjee, A.; Chakraborty, S. Role of modified Chaplygin gas in accelerated universe.Class. Quantum Gravity2004,21, 5609–5617

  27. [35]

    Latest supernova data in the framework of the generalized Chaplygin gas model.Mon

    Bertolami, O.; Sen, A.A.; Sen, S.; Silva, P.T. Latest supernova data in the framework of the generalized Chaplygin gas model.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2004,353, 329–337

    2004

  28. [36]

    Notes on modified Chaplygin gas cosmology.Eur

    Jamil, M.; Momeni, D.; Rashid, M.A. Notes on modified Chaplygin gas cosmology.Eur. Phys. J. C2011,71, 1711

  29. [37]

    General relativistic polytropic fluid spheres.Astrophys

    Tooper, R.F. General relativistic polytropic fluid spheres.Astrophys. J.1964,140, 434–459

    1964

  30. [38]

    Adiabatic fluid spheres in general relativity.Astrophys

    Tooper, R.F. Adiabatic fluid spheres in general relativity.Astrophys. J.1965,142, 1541–1562

    1965

  31. [39]

    Models of universe with a polytropic equation of state: I

    Chavanis, P.-H. Models of universe with a polytropic equation of state: I. The early universe.Eur. Phys. J. Plus2014, 129, 38

  32. [40]

    Polytropic gas model of dark energy.J

    Karami, K.; Khaledian, M.S. Polytropic gas model of dark energy.J. High Energy Phys.2011,03, 086

    2011

  33. [41]

    Glendenning, N.K.Compact Stars: Nuclear Physics, Particle Physics, and General Relativity, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2000

    2000

  34. [42]

    Haensel, P.; Potekhin, A.Y.; Yakovlev, D.G.Neutron Stars 1: Equation of State and Structure; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2007

    2007

  35. [43]

    Horedt, G.P.Polytropes: Applications in Astrophysics and Related Fields; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004

    2004

  36. [44]

    The equation of state of hot, dense matter and neutron stars.Phys

    Lattimer, J.M.; Prakash, M. The equation of state of hot, dense matter and neutron stars.Phys. Rep.2016,621, 127–164

    2016

  37. [45]

    Planck 2018 results

    Planck Collaboration. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters.Astron. Astrophys.2020,641, A6

    2018

  38. [46]

    Chaplygin traversable wormholes.Phys

    Lobo, F.S.N. Chaplygin traversable wormholes.Phys. Rev. D2006,73, 064028

  39. [47]

    The generalized Chaplygin gas, wormholes, and energy conditions

    Rahaman, F.; Kalam, M.; Sarker, M.; Kuhfittig, P.K.F. The generalized Chaplygin gas, wormholes, and energy conditions. Phys. Lett. B2006,633, 161–163

  40. [48]

    Electromagnetic Kantowski–Sachs solutions in teleparallelF(T)gravity.Symmetry2026,18, 1028

    Landry, A. Electromagnetic Kantowski–Sachs solutions in teleparallelF(T)gravity.Symmetry2026,18, 1028

  41. [49]

    Dynamical systems applied to cosmology: Dark energy and modified gravity.Phys

    Bahamonde, S.; Böhmer, C.G.; Carloni, S.; Copeland, E.J.; Fang, W.; Tamanini, N. Dynamical systems applied to cosmology: Dark energy and modified gravity.Phys. Rep.2018,775–777, 1–122

    2018

  42. [50]

    New General Relativity.Phys

    Hayashi, K.; Shirafuji, T. New General Relativity.Phys. Rev. D1979,19, 3524–3553

  43. [51]

    Teleparallel Palatini theories.Universe2023,9, 466

    Beltrán Jiménez, J.; Heisenberg, L.; Koivisto, T. Teleparallel Palatini theories.Universe2023,9, 466

  44. [52]

    Modified teleparallel theories of gravity.Phys

    Bahamonde, S.; Böhmer, C.G.; Wright, M. Modified teleparallel theories of gravity.Phys. Rev. D2015,92, 104042

Pith tools

Reviewed July 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.