Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 52 references

The tunneling wave function of the universe is recovered as the limit of tunneling from an arbitrarily small finite throat, not by a boundary condition at vanishing geometry.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 06:29 UTC pith:UZ253CB6

load-bearing objection Solid minisuperspace construction that recovers the tunneling wave function as a controlled small-throat limit; the math holds, the modeling gap is acknowledged and not fatal. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.08815 v1 pith:UZ253CB6 submitted 2026-07-09 gr-qc hep-th

A Small-Throat Boundary Condition for the Tunneling Wave Function of the Universe

Masaki Yamada This is my paper
classification gr-qc hep-th
keywords tunneling wave functionLorentzian path integralquantum cosmologyminisuperspacePicard-Lefschetz theorysmall throatNeumann boundary conditionde Sitter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper offers a way to define the tunneling wave function of a closed universe without putting a boundary condition directly at zero size. Universe creation is treated as the pinch-off limit of a geometry that was once connected to another spacetime through a small throat. In a simple closed minisuperspace model with a cosmological constant, a small radiation term of strength ε creates two turning points: a tiny inner throat and the usual outer de Sitter turning point. The initial size is integrated only over a small domain that contains the inner throat and obeys a Neumann condition at the initial endpoint; that restriction selects the suppressed tunneling saddle and its steepest-descent contour while automatically discarding the unsuppressed outer saddle. After the finite-throat problem is fully defined, the limit ε → 0 collapses the domain to vanishing size and the on-shell action reduces exactly to the standard pure-de-Sitter tunneling exponent and Lorentzian phase. Different lapse contours can still recover Hartle–Hawking-type growing branches. The construction therefore obtains the familiar tunneling wave function as a decoupling limit of tunneling from an arbitrarily small universe rather than by fiat at a singular point.

Core claim

After a finite-ε radiation model is equipped with the Neumann condition q̇(0)=0 and with the initial size restricted to the relative cycle inside the punctured disk 0 < |qi| < √(ε)/H that contains the inner turning point, the subsequent limit ε → 0 collapses that domain to qi o 0 and reduces the saddle action to the standard pure-de-Sitter tunneling wave function exp(-4π^{2}/H^{2} - i Φ).

What carries the argument

The small-throat cycle D_ε: a relative one-cycle in the punctured disk 0 < |qi| < R_ε = √(ε)/H that forces the Neumann condition q̇(0)=0, selects the Riemann sheet of the inner-to-outer branch cut, and excludes the unsuppressed outer turning-point saddle before the saddle-point approximation is performed.

Load-bearing premise

That a homogeneous radiation term of strength ε together with the postulated small relative cycle around the origin is a faithful model of a throat pinching off from a parent universe, so that the ε o 0 limit after the finite problem is defined really yields the correct creation-from-nothing wave function.

What would settle it

Construct an explicit two-sided wormhole or parent-universe path integral whose throat is supported by radiation or charge; show that the induced integration cycle for the remaining half-geometry is not the relative cycle inside 0 < |qi| < √(ε)/H, or that its ε o 0 limit fails to recover the standard tunneling exponent 4π^{2}/H^{2}.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a small-throat prescription for the tunneling wave function of a closed universe in the Lorentzian path integral. Motivated by pinch-off of a throat connecting to a parent spacetime, it models a finite throat by a small radiation component ε in closed de Sitter minisuperspace (variable q=a^{2}). This produces turning points q_-∼O(ε) and q_+∼H^{-2}. The prescription integrates the initial size q_i over a relative cycle D_ε in the punctured disk 0<|q_i|<R_ε=√(ε)/H (containing q_- but not q_+), which induces the Neumann condition q̇(0)=0 and selects the Riemann sheet of the small-throat tunneling saddle while excluding the unsuppressed outer saddle. After the finite-ε problem is defined, the limit ε o0 collapses D_ε to q_i o0 and recovers the standard pure-de-Sitter tunneling exponent B=4π^{2}/H^{2} plus the usual Lorentzian WKB phase. Analytic on-shell actions (via elliptic integrals) and numerical Picard–Lefschetz maps of the multi-valued map q_i o N support the construction; other lapse contours can select Hartle–Hawking-type branches.

Significance. If the construction is accepted as a legitimate effective description, it supplies a concrete Lorentzian path-integral realization of the tunneling wave function as a decoupling limit of tunneling from a small but finite universe, rather than as a boundary condition imposed directly at a vanishing geometry. The analytic reduction of B_ε and Φ_ε to the pure-de-Sitter values (Eqs. 63–65) is parameter-free once the finite-ε saddle problem is set, and the numerical sampling of the complex-N plane (Figs. 3–4) gives concrete evidence that the small-disk restriction selects the desired sheet and excludes the outer unsuppressed saddle. The discussion of inverse-Gaussian perturbations (Sec. VI) is a potentially useful byproduct: at finite ε the background is an ordinary finite-throat tunneling problem, so regular boundary conditions for fluctuations may avoid the singular zero-size branch. The work is limited to homogeneous minisuperspace and does not derive D_ε from a two-sided geometry, but within that scope it is a clear, self-contained contribution to the contour/saddle literature on Lorentzian quantum cosmology.

major comments (2)
  1. Sec. II.B and Sec. VI: the relative cycle D_ε in 0<|q_i|<R_ε is postulated rather than derived from a two-sided wormhole or parent-universe path integral. The paper is explicit that this is an effective half-geometry model, so there is no internal inconsistency, but the central physical claim (that the ε o0 limit after defining the finite-throat problem yields the correct creation-from-nothing wave function) rests on this modeling assumption. A short additional argument or toy two-sided calculation showing that the inversion scale R_ε=√(q_-q_+) and the relative cycle arise naturally would substantially strengthen the claim; without it the result remains a consistent effective prescription rather than a derivation from a parent geometry.
  2. Sec. VI (final paragraphs): the suggestion that the prescription resolves the unsuppressed/inverse-Gaussian perturbation problem is plausible but not demonstrated. At finite ε the background is regular, yet no fluctuation analysis or mode boundary conditions are given. Either a brief one-loop sketch (or a clear statement that the claim is only heuristic and deferred) is needed so that the reader can judge whether the expectation is supported or merely hoped for.
minor comments (5)
  1. Eqs. (35)–(37) and Fig. 2: the branch conventions for (s,η) and the detour around q=0 for Re[q_i]≤0 are clear in principle but dense; a short explicit statement of which combination yields the tunneling saddle (s=η=1) earlier in Sec. III would help the reader track the multi-valued map.
  2. Figs. 3–4: the dense labeling (D_i, A_i, L_i, R_{1+}, R_{2+}, etc.) is hard to parse at a glance. A short legend or a sentence in the caption listing which curves are the Picard–Lefschetz thimbles for the tunneling saddle would improve readability.
  3. Footnote 2 and the surrounding text: the distinction between the minisuperspace Neumann condition q̇(0)=0 and covariant Neumann/Robin prescriptions is important and well taken; a single clarifying sentence in the main text (not only the footnote) would prevent misreading by readers familiar with the no-boundary Neumann literature.
  4. Sec. IV.D, Eq. (81): the pure-de-Sitter initial derivative for the outgoing branch is quoted for contrast; stating the convention for the square-root branch of √(H^{2}q_1-1) would make the comparison fully self-contained.
  5. References: the recent Euclidean wormhole/throat papers (e.g. Lavrelashvili–Lehners) are cited; a brief remark on whether any of those geometries already exhibit an inversion scale analogous to R_ε would connect the effective model more tightly to the motivating literature.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the finite-ε Neumann+small-disk construction is an auxiliary regulator whose ε o0 limit recovers the known pure-de-Sitter tunneling exponent by direct evaluation, not by fitting or self-definition of the target.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a proposed boundary prescription (Neumann ṋq(0)=0 plus relative cycle D_ε inside the punctured disk 0<|q_i|<R_ε=√(ε)/H that contains the radiation-induced inner turning point q_-) whose on-shell action, after the finite-ε saddle problem is defined, reduces analytically in the limit ε o0 to the standard tunneling exponent B=4π^{2}/H^{2} plus the usual Lorentzian WKB phase (Eqs. 52–65). This is a self-contained minisuperspace calculation: the first integral, branch structure, elliptic-integral expressions for B_ε and Φ_ε, and the collapse of D_ε o{0} are derived from the action (5)–(7) without external data fits. Self-citations (e.g. to Vilenkin–Yamada tunneling papers and the author's prior regularization work) supply background motivation and a remark on fluctuations, but are not load-bearing for the saddle selection or the limit; the Picard–Lefschetz numerics (Figs. 3–4) independently confirm exclusion of the outer unsuppressed saddle. The construction is intentionally engineered to select the desired sheet, which is ordinary for a boundary-condition proposal rather than a circular derivation of a new quantitative prediction. Score 1 only for the minor presence of author-overlapping citations that do not force the result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 4 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard closed minisuperspace Einstein–Hilbert action with positive Λ plus a homogeneous radiation term, the validity of Picard–Lefschetz contour deformation for the complex lapse, and the modeling assumption that the radiation-induced inner turning point plus the postulated relative cycle D_ε adequately represent a throat pinch-off. No free parameters are fitted to data; ε is an auxiliary regulator. The small-throat domain itself is an invented entity introduced to select the desired Riemann sheet.

free parameters (1)
  • ε (radiation strength)
    Auxiliary positive parameter that creates the finite inner turning point; taken to zero after the saddle problem is defined. Not fitted to data, but its introduction and the associated disk radius R_ε=√(ε)/H are chosen by hand to model the throat.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Closed FLRW minisuperspace with metric ds^{2}=-N^{2}/q dt^{2} + q dΩ_{3}^{2} and action (5) is sufficient to capture the essential saddle structure of the tunneling wave function.
    Standard truncation used throughout the quantum-cosmology literature cited in Sec. I; invoked from Sec. II onward.
  • domain assumption Picard–Lefschetz theory correctly selects the relevant complex-lapse contours for the oscillatory Lorentzian path integral.
    Assumed throughout; numerical steepest-descent contours in Sec. V rely on it.
  • ad hoc to paper A homogeneous radiation component parametrized by ε models a finite throat whose pinch-off limit yields universe creation.
    Introduced in Sec. II.A–B as a proxy for a parent-universe throat; not derived from a two-sided geometry.
  • ad hoc to paper The relative cycle D_ε in the punctured disk 0<|qi|<R_ε is the correct integration domain that selects the small-throat tunneling sheet.
    Postulated in Sec. II.B; the paper notes it is not derived from a complete two-sided path integral (Sec. VI).
invented entities (2)
  • small-throat relative cycle D_ε no independent evidence
    purpose: Restricts the initial size qi so that only the inner turning-point saddle is included and the unsuppressed outer saddle is excluded before the saddle-point approximation.
    Defined in Sec. II.B as a relative one-cycle in the punctured disk; collapses to {0} as ε o0. No independent geometric derivation from a full wormhole path integral is given.
  • radiation-induced finite throat (inner turning point q_-) no independent evidence
    purpose: Provides a non-singular starting geometry that can be sent to zero after the path integral is defined.
    Generated by the ε/q term in the potential U(q); used as a proxy for a parent-universe throat (Fig. 1 and Sec. II).

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 19499 in / 3456 out tokens · 28525 ms · 2026-07-13T06:29:26.499459+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose a small-throat prescription for the wave function of a closed universe in the Lorentzian path integral formalism, motivated by the idea that universe creation may be obtained as the decoupling, or pinch-off, limit of a tunneling geometry connected to another universe through a small throat. Instead of retaining the parent-universe side explicitly, we describe the remaining half-geometry by a minisuperspace path integral with boundary conditions imposed at the throat. To model the finite throat, we introduce a small radiation component parametrized by $\epsilon$ in a closed minisuperspace model with a positive cosmological constant. The radiation term produces two turning points, an inner one $q_-\sim O(\epsilon)$ and an outer one $q_+\sim H^{-2}$, where $q$ is the square of the scale factor. Our prescription imposes the Neumann condition $\dot q(0)=0$ at the initial endpoint and restricts the initial size $q_i=q(0)$ to a small-throat domain $0<|q_i|<\sqrt{\epsilon}/H$ that contains $q_-$. This restriction selects the Riemann sheet containing the small-throat tunneling saddle and its Picard--Lefschetz cycle, while excluding the unsuppressed saddle associated with the outer turning point $q_+$. Taking the limit $\epsilon\to0$ after this finite-throat saddle problem has been defined, the small-throat domain collapses to $q_i \to 0$, and the saddle action reduces to that of the standard tunneling saddle. Other choices of lapse contour can instead select Hartle--Hawking-type growing branches. In this sense, the tunneling wave function can be obtained as the limiting form of tunneling from an arbitrarily small universe in a Lorentzian path integral, rather than by imposing a boundary condition directly at a vanishing geometry.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08815 by Masaki Yamada.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of the small-throat boundary con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Two representative integration contours in the complex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Complex lapse plane (upper panel) and corresponding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Complex lapse plane obtained from the complementary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 33 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    B. S. DeWitt,Quantum Theory of Gravity. 1. The Canonical Theory,Phys. Rev.160(1967) 1113

    1967

  2. [2]

    J. B. Hartle and S. W . Hawking,Wave Function of the Universe, Phys. Rev. D28(1983) 2960

    1983

  3. [3]

    Vilenkin,The Birth of Inflationary Universes,Phys

    A. Vilenkin,The Birth of Inflationary Universes,Phys. Rev. D 27(1983) 2848

    1983

  4. [4]

    Vilenkin,Quantum Creation of Universes,Phys

    A. Vilenkin,Quantum Creation of Universes,Phys. Rev. D30 (1984) 509

    1984

  5. [5]

    A. D. Linde,Quantum Creation of the Inflationary Universe, Lett. Nuovo Cim.39(1984) 401

    1984

  6. [6]

    V . A. Rubakov,Quantum Mechanics in the Tunneling Universe,Phys. Lett. B148(1984) 280

    1984

  7. [7]

    Y. B. Zeldovich and A. A. Starobinsky,Quantum creation of a universe in a nontrivial topology,Sov. Astron. Lett.10(1984) 135

    1984

  8. [8]

    Vilenkin,Boundary Conditions in Quantum Cosmology, Phys

    A. Vilenkin,Boundary Conditions in Quantum Cosmology, Phys. Rev. D33(1986) 3560

    1986

  9. [9]

    Vilenkin,Quantum Cosmology and the Initial State of the Universe,Phys

    A. Vilenkin,Quantum Cosmology and the Initial State of the Universe,Phys. Rev. D37(1988) 888

    1988

  10. [10]

    Vilenkin,Approaches to quantum cosmology,Phys

    A. Vilenkin,Approaches to quantum cosmology,Phys. Rev. D 50(1994) 2581 [gr-qc/9403010]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  11. [11]

    Louko,Propagation Amplitude in Homogeneous Quantum Cosmology,Class

    J. Louko,Propagation Amplitude in Homogeneous Quantum Cosmology,Class. Quant. Grav.4(1987) 581

    1987

  12. [12]

    J. J. Halliwell and J. Louko,Steepest Descent Contours in the Path Integral Approach to Quantum Cosmology. 1. The De Sitter Minisuperspace Model,Phys. Rev. D39(1989) 2206

    1989

  13. [13]

    J. J. Halliwell and J. B. Hartle,Integration Contours for the No Boundary Wave Function of the Universe,Phys. Rev. D41 (1990) 1815

    1990

  14. [14]

    J. D. Brown and E. A. Martinez,Lorentzian Path Integral for Minisuperspace Cosmology,Phys. Rev. D42(1990) 1931

    1990

  15. [15]

    Feldbrugge, J.-L

    J. Feldbrugge, J.-L. Lehners and N. Turok,Lorentzian Quantum Cosmology,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 103508 [1703.02076]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    G. W . Gibbons, S. W . Hawking and M. J. Perry,Path Integrals and the Indefiniteness of the Gravitational Action,Nucl. Phys. 10 B138(1978) 141

    1978

  17. [17]

    Honda, H

    M. Honda, H. Matsui, K. Okabayashi and T . Terada, Resurgence in Lorentzian quantum cosmology: No-boundary saddles and resummation of quantum gravity corrections around tunneling saddle points,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 083508 [2402.09981]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Chou and J

    C.-Y. Chou and J. Nishimura,Monte Carlo studies of quantum cosmology by the generalized Lefschetz thimble method,JHEP 05(2025) 142 [2407.17724]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Diaz Dorronsoro, J

    J. Diaz Dorronsoro, J. J. Halliwell, J. B. Hartle, T . Hertog and O. Janssen,Real no-boundary wave function in Lorentzian quantum cosmology,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 043505 [1705.05340]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    Diaz Dorronsoro, J

    J. Diaz Dorronsoro, J. J. Halliwell, J. B. Hartle, T . Hertog, O. Janssen and Y. Vreys,Damped perturbations in the no-boundary state,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 081302 [1804.01102]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  21. [21]

    Janssen, J

    O. Janssen, J. J. Halliwell and T . Hertog,No-boundary proposal in biaxial Bianchi IX minisuperspace,Phys. Rev. D 99(2019) 123531 [1904.11602]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  22. [22]

    J.-y. Hong, A. Vilenkin and S. Winitzki,Creation of massive particles in a tunneling universe,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 023521 [gr-qc/0305025]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  23. [23]

    Vilenkin and M

    A. Vilenkin and M. Yamada,Tunneling wave function of the universe,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 066003 [1808.02032]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  24. [24]

    Lavrelashvili and J.-L

    G. Lavrelashvili and J.-L. Lehners,Nucleating an Inflationary Universe: Euclidean Wormholes and their No-Boundary Limit,2603.11003

    arXiv

  25. [25]

    Lavrelashvili and J.-L

    G. Lavrelashvili and J.-L. Lehners,Birth of Inflationary Universes via Wineglass Wormholes and their No-Boundary Relatives,2605.10548

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    S. B. Giddings and A. Strominger,Axion Induced Topology Change in Quantum Gravity and String Theory,Nucl. Phys. B 306(1988) 890

    1988

  27. [27]

    G. V . Lavrelashvili, V . A. Rubakov and P . G. Tinyakov,Loss of Quantum Coherence Due to Topological Changes: A Toy Model,Mod. Phys. Lett. A3(1988) 1231

    1988

  28. [28]

    V . A. Rubakov and P . G. Tinyakov,Gravitational Instantons and Creation of Expanding Universes,Phys. Lett. B214(1988) 334

    1988

  29. [29]

    Jonas, G

    C. Jonas, G. Lavrelashvili and J.-L. Lehners,Zoo of axionic wormholes,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 066012 [2306.11129]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Betzios and O

    P . Betzios and O. Papadoulaki,Inflationary Cosmology from Anti-de Sitter Wormholes,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 021501 [2403.17046]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Lan and Y.-S

    Q.-Y. Lan and Y.-S. Piao,Prepare inflationary universe via the Euclidean charged wormhole,2411.13844

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    Betzios, I

    P . Betzios, I. D. Gialamas and O. Papadoulaki,Magnetic anti–de Sitter wormholes as seeds for Higgs inflation,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 123542 [2412.03639]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Betzios, P

    P . Betzios, P . Ghiringhelli, I. D. Gialamas and O. Papadoulaki, A Menagerie of Wormholes and Cosmologies in the Gravitational Path Integral,2602.23432

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    Di Tucci and J.-L

    A. Di Tucci and J.-L. Lehners,No-Boundary Proposal as a Path Integral with Robin Boundary Conditions,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 201302 [1903.06757]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    Di Tucci, J.-L

    A. Di Tucci, J.-L. Lehners and L. Sberna,No-boundary prescriptions in Lorentzian quantum cosmology,Phys. Rev. D 100(2019) 123543 [1911.06701]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    Di Tucci, M

    A. Di Tucci, M. P . Heller and J.-L. Lehners,Lessons for quantum cosmology from anti–de Sitter black holes,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 086011 [2007.04872]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    Krishnan and A

    C. Krishnan and A. Raju,A Neumann Boundary Term for Gravity,Mod. Phys. Lett. A32(2017) 1750077 [1605.01603]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  38. [38]

    Yamada,New regularization scheme for the wave function of the Universe in the Lorentzian path integral,Phys

    M. Yamada,New regularization scheme for the wave function of the Universe in the Lorentzian path integral,Phys. Rev. D 113(2026) 063547 [2511.09621]

    arXiv 2026

  39. [39]

    Lehners,Wave function of simple universes analytically continued from negative to positive potentials,Phys

    J.-L. Lehners,Wave function of simple universes analytically continued from negative to positive potentials,Phys. Rev. D 104(2021) 063527 [2105.12075]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Feldbrugge, J.-L

    J. Feldbrugge, J.-L. Lehners and N. Turok,No smooth beginning for spacetime,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 171301 [1705.00192]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  41. [41]

    Feldbrugge, J.-L

    J. Feldbrugge, J.-L. Lehners and N. Turok,No rescue for the no boundary proposal: Pointers to the future of quantum cosmology,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 023509 [1708.05104]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    Feldbrugge, J.-L

    J. Feldbrugge, J.-L. Lehners and N. Turok,Inconsistencies of the New No-Boundary Proposal,Universe4(2018) 100 [1805.01609]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  43. [43]

    Bojowald and S

    M. Bojowald and S. Brahma,Loops rescue the no-boundary proposal,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 201301 [1810.09871]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  44. [44]

    S.-J. Wang, M. Yamada and A. Vilenkin,Constraints on non-minimal coupling from quantum cosmology,JCAP08 (2019) 025 [1903.11736]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    Bojowald and S

    M. Bojowald and S. Brahma,Loop quantum gravity, signature change, and the no-boundary proposal,Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 106023 [2011.02884]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    Matsui, S

    H. Matsui, S. Mukohyama and A. Naruko,No smooth spacetime in Lorentzian quantum cosmology and trans-Planckian physics,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 043511 [2211.05306]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Matsui,No smooth spacetime: Exploring primordial perturbations in Lorentzian quantum cosmology,Phys

    H. Matsui,No smooth spacetime: Exploring primordial perturbations in Lorentzian quantum cosmology,Phys. Rev. D 110(2024) 023503 [2404.18609]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Vilenkin and M

    A. Vilenkin and M. Yamada,Tunneling wave function of the universe II: the backreaction problem,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 066010 [1812.08084]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    Ailiga, S

    M. Ailiga, S. Mallik and G. Narain,Lorentzian Robin Universe, JHEP01(2024) 124 [2308.01310]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Ailiga, S

    M. Ailiga, S. Mallik and G. Narain,Lorentzian Robin Universe of Gauss-Bonnet Gravity,Gen. Rel. Grav.57(2025) 29 [2407.16692]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Ailiga, S

    M. Ailiga, S. Mallik and G. Narain,Boundary choices and one-loop complex gravitational path integral,Phys. Rev. D 111(2025) 123538 [2410.19724]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Mallik and G

    S. Mallik and G. Narain,IR behaviour of one-loop complex R×S 3 saddles,2604.21736

    Pith/arXiv arXiv