Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 44 references

Physical-space methods prove Morawetz–energy estimates for scalar waves on Kerr with angular momentum up to three-quarters of mass.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 05:29 UTC pith:I5OODZ6I

load-bearing objection Solid physical-space Morawetz machinery for Kerr up to |a|/m=0.75, but the unconditional main theorem hangs on a deferred flux-independent energy bound in the companion paper. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.08958 v1 pith:I5OODZ6I submitted 2026-07-09 gr-qc

A Physical space derivation of Morawetz-Energy estimates in Kerr spacetimes with large angular momentum

classification gr-qc MSC 83C5735L0558J45 PACS 04.70.Bw04.20.Ex04.25.Nx
keywords Kerr spacetimeMorawetz estimatesphysical-space methodstrapped null geodesicsscalar wave equationhorizon fluxWhiting transformblack-hole stability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that solutions of the scalar wave equation on a Kerr black hole with angular momentum at most three-quarters of the mass obey a global Morawetz–energy estimate: a spacetime bulk integral that controls radial and angular derivatives (with a controlled degeneracy at photon orbits) plus energy and horizon flux is bounded by initial energy and the size of any inhomogeneous term. The authors deliberately avoid frequency-space analysis and mode stability theorems, building instead on physical-space multipliers, a sharp geometric description of the trapped null geodesics, Stogin’s treatment of low frequencies, and a physical-space adaptation of Whiting’s transform that yields an energy bound independent of the horizon flux. A continuity argument then removes residual local-energy terms and produces an unconditional global bound. The motivation is practical: estimates written only in physical space are far more likely to survive the passage to the nonlinear, non-exactly-Kerr metrics that appear in the black-hole stability problem.

Core claim

For the inhomogeneous scalar wave equation on Kerr with |a|/m ≤ 0.75 and sufficiently high Sobolev regularity, the combined Morawetz–energy–flux quantity is controlled solely by the initial energy and the inhomogeneous norm; the estimate is obtained entirely by physical-space methods and holds globally in time.

What carries the argument

Conditional Morawetz identities built from the Andersson–Blue invariant operators, modified by a vector field that is exactly Killing and causal on the photon region, combined with a flux-independent energy bound coming from a physical-space Whiting transform; a continuity argument in the angular-momentum parameter then upgrades the conditional estimate to an unconditional global bound.

Load-bearing premise

The entire argument rests on a flux-independent energy bound that is proved only in a companion paper; without that bound the horizon flux cannot be closed and the continuity argument fails.

What would settle it

If the physical-space Whiting transform of the companion paper fails to produce a flux-independent energy bound for |a|/m near 0.75, or if the algebraic positivity of the bulk quadratic form collapses for some value of a/m in that range, the main theorem does not hold.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The same physical-space multipliers and trapping characterization can be tried on the Teukolsky equation, removing the need for mode stability as a black box.
  • Realistic metric perturbations of Kerr become accessible without having to re-prove quantitative mode stability for every nearby background.
  • The causal vector field that is Killing on the trapping set supplies a new energy identity usable in any spacetime whose photon region is similarly characterized.
  • The continuity argument in angular momentum gives a template for upgrading conditional estimates whenever a compactly supported error can be absorbed by a gain of derivatives.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the trapping set is described by an explicit sixth-degree polynomial, the same polynomial can be used to construct multipliers for other separable wave operators on Kerr.
  • The restriction |a|/m ≤ 0.75 is an artifact of the Riccati inequalities that close the lower-order terms; a more refined choice of the Lagrangian correction should push the range closer to extremality.
  • Once the companion Whiting transform is available, the same pipeline yields decay estimates for the extreme curvature components that appear in the nonlinear stability problem.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper derives Morawetz–energy estimates for the inhomogeneous scalar wave equation □_{a,m}ψ=N on the exterior of Kerr with |a|/m≤0.75. The Main Theorem 1.1 asserts that the combined bulk–energy–flux quantity B E F^s_p[ψ](τ_1,τ_2) is controlled by the initial energy E^s_p[ψ](τ_1) plus the inhomogeneous norm N^s_p, for s≥8 and 1+δ<p<2−δ. The argument proceeds by a chain of conditional estimates: a Stogin-type conditional Morawetz (Thm 1.12), a non-trapping conditional Morawetz (Thm 1.13), S-derivative Morawetz via Andersson–Blue operators (Thm 1.14), a flux-independent energy bound (Thm 1.3, deferred), a horizon-flux bound (Thm 1.4), a continuity argument in a (Thm 1.9), and a new energy estimate from a causal vector field that is Killing on the trapping set (Thm 1.10). The trapping region is characterized by the vanishing of the polynomial Θ(r) (Prop. 3.8).

Significance. If the deferred flux-independent energy bound holds, the paper supplies a largely physical-space route to Morawetz–energy estimates for moderately large angular momentum, extending Andersson–Blue and the small-a work of Giorgi–Klainerman–Szeftel without mode decomposition. The physical-space characterization of the full r-range of trapped null geodesics (Prop. 3.8), the adaptation of Stogin’s low-frequency method, the full use of the principal trapping term together with Hardy inequalities, and the construction of a causal vector field ˚T that is Killing on [br_1,br_2] for |a|/m<0.9 are concrete technical contributions that are written out in detail and are of independent interest for future work on Teukolsky and on realistic perturbations of Kerr.

major comments (2)
  1. Theorem 1.3 (flux-independent energy bound (1.5)) is stated as an essential input but its proof is postponed entirely to the forthcoming paper [19] (explicitly noted after the statement of Thm 1.3 and in §1.3). The proof chain of the Main Theorem runs conditional Morawetz (1.4) → Thm 1.3 → horizon flux (1.6) → conditional Morawetz-energy (1.8) → continuity (1.9). Without a verified bound of the form (1.5), the local-energy terms on the right-hand side of (1.8) cannot be shown to vanish and the continuity argument of §8 cannot close. The present manuscript is therefore incomplete as a self-contained derivation of the unconditional estimate (1.3).
  2. Several load-bearing algebraic positivity statements for |a|/m≤0.75 are verified only by Mathematica (Prop. 5.4 on the signs of eA_a; the Riccati inequalities of Props. 6.5–6.6 and their solutions in §6.4; the quadratic-form lower bounds in Prop. 5.9 and Appendix C). The restriction |a|/m≤0.75 is described as technical (Remark 6.3), yet no analytic substitute or independent check is supplied. For a result whose range is limited precisely by these verifications, the manuscript should either include the key symbolic expressions or make the verification scripts available so that the cut-off can be audited.
minor comments (4)
  1. The abstract and introduction repeatedly emphasize suitability for “realistic perturbations of Kerr,” but the body treats only exact Kerr. A short clarifying sentence on what is expected to carry over would help the reader.
  2. Notation for the combined quantities B E F, (deg)B E F, etc. (Defs. 2.12–2.17) is dense; a short summary table would improve readability.
  3. The date “July 13, 2026” on the title page is presumably a typographical error and should be corrected.
  4. References [19] and [41] are cited as “in preparation” / arXiv preprints; their status should be updated if possible before final publication.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Main unconditional theorem depends on a deferred same-author flux bound and a small-a base case, but the bulk of the conditional Morawetz/S-derivative derivation is self-contained and non-circular.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [§1.3 Statement of Theorem 1.3; also Abstract and after (1.5)]
    "We postpone the proof of Theorem 1.3 to [19] where we also give a full account of our transformation technique. ... physical-space versions of Whiting’s transform [44], developed in a forthcoming paper [19], which yield a flux-independent energy estimate"

    Theorem 1.3 supplies the flux-independent energy bound (1.5) that removes the horizon flux from the right-hand side of the conditional Morawetz estimate (1.4). The subsequent chain (Thm 1.4 → Prop. 1.5 → Thm 1.6 → continuity Thm 1.9 → Main Thm 1.1) treats (1.5) as given. The only justification is a citation to a forthcoming paper by the same authors; no proof or external verification appears in the present manuscript. The unconditional claim therefore rests on an unverified same-author black box.

  2. self citation load bearing [§1.3 / §8 continuity argument; Remark after Thm 1.9]
    "Based on the small|a|/m results of [18]. The closeness requirement in the continuity argument is straightforward. ... we assume that the expectation ... holds true for a≤a0, note that it is unconditionally true for small a0, and show that it must also hold true for a small neighborhood of a0"

    The continuity argument that upgrades the conditional estimate (1.8) to the global unconditional Morawetz (1.9) takes as base case the small-angular-momentum Energy-Morawetz estimates of [18] (Giorgi–Klainerman–Szeftel). Klainerman is a coauthor of both papers. The base case is therefore a same-author citation rather than an independent external theorem; the openness step then propagates that base. This is ordinary bootstrap self-citation and not definitional circularity, but it is load-bearing for the range |a|/m up to 0.75.

full rationale

The paper’s core technical content—physical-space characterization of the trapped set via Θ(r) (Prop. 3.8), Stogin-style tempered multipliers, S-valued currents with Hardy/Riccati control of lower-order terms, and the causal vectorfield ˚T Killing on trapping—is derived from Kerr geometry and explicit multiplier constructions without defining the target estimates in terms of themselves or fitting parameters. The continuity argument in a (Thm 1.9 / §8) is a standard bootstrap: base case for small |a|/m is imported from [18] (overlapping author Klainerman), then openness/closedness is proved for Z-modes. That is ordinary self-citation of prior work, not a tautology. The single load-bearing external link is Theorem 1.3 (flux-independent energy), whose proof is postponed entirely to the forthcoming same-author paper [19]/[H-K2]. Without it the chain from conditional Morawetz (1.2) to unconditional (1.9) does not close, so the Main Theorem is incomplete as a self-contained derivation. This is a genuine dependency on unverified same-author material, scored as mild self-citation load-bearing (score 2), not as definitional circularity or fitted prediction. No self-definitional identities, no fitted inputs renamed as predictions, and no uniqueness theorems smuggled from the authors’ prior work to forbid alternatives appear in the load-bearing steps that are actually proved here.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Kerr metric and its symmetries (standard domain assumptions), on the forthcoming physical-space Whiting transform of [H-K2], on computer-assisted positivity checks for the range |a|/m ≤ 0.75, and on a continuity argument that starts from the known small-a regime. No free parameters are fitted to data; the numerical cut-offs 0.75 and 0.9 are technical thresholds chosen so that the algebraic inequalities close.

free parameters (2)
  • angular-momentum cut-off |a|/m ≤ 0.75 = 0.75
    Chosen so that the Riccati inequalities and quadratic-form positivity statements close; the paper states the restriction is technical and expects extension.
  • energy-vector-field cut-off |a|/m < 0.9 = 0.9
    Threshold at which a causal vector field that is Killing on the trapping set can be constructed (Proposition 9.8).
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Existence of the Kerr metric g_{a,m} with |a| < m and its Killing fields T, Z together with the Carter operator O that commute with the wave operator.
    Standard geometric background used throughout Sections 2–3.
  • ad hoc to paper The flux-independent energy bound of Theorem 1.3, proved via physical-space Whiting transforms in the forthcoming paper [H-K2].
    Invoked as a black box to control horizon flux; without it the unconditional Morawetz estimate does not close.
  • domain assumption Small-angular-momentum Morawetz-energy estimates of [GKS]/[18] that serve as the base case of the continuity argument in a.
    Used in Section 8 to start the continuity argument.
  • ad hoc to paper Algebraic positivity of certain quadratic forms and solvability of Riccati inequalities for |a|/m ≤ 0.75, verified by Mathematica.
    Appears in Sections 5–6; no independent certificate is supplied.
invented entities (2)
  • Physical-space Whiting transform (deferred to [H-K2]) no independent evidence
    purpose: Produces a flux-independent energy estimate that replaces quantitative mode stability.
    Introduced as a new physical-space adaptation of Whiting’s integral transform; independent evidence is promised in the forthcoming paper but not present here.
  • Causal vector field ˚T that is Killing on the trapping set [br1,br2] independent evidence
    purpose: Supplies the final energy estimate without deformation-tensor error on the trapping region.
    Constructed explicitly in Section 9 for |a|/m < 0.9; its existence is a geometric fact once the trapping interval is known.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 107867 in / 3205 out tokens · 37471 ms · 2026-07-13T05:29:41.444217+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We revisit the derivation of Morawetz--energy estimates for scalar wave equations in the domain of outer communication of a Kerr spacetime \(\KK(a,m)\). Our goal is to develop robust physical-space methods which are well suited for extension to realistic perturbations of Kerr. The proof rests on several ingredients. First, we derive conditional Morawetz estimates which extend the physical-space techniques initiated by Andersson and Blue \cite{AB}, and later adapted in \cite{GKS} to perturbations of slowly rotating Kerr, by exploiting a physical-space characterization of the full \(r\)-range of trapped null geodesics. Second, we use an idea introduced by Stogin \cite{St} in the axially symmetric case to handle the low-frequency difficulties in the Morawetz estimates. In the general case, the control of the lower-order terms also requires making full use of the principal trapping term in the Morawetz bulk norm, together with a new use of Hardy-type inequalities. A further new ingredient is the control of the boundary terms generated by the Morawetz estimates. This is based on two additional ideas: physical-space versions of Whiting's transform \cite{W}, developed in a forthcoming paper \cite{H-K2}, which yield a flux-independent energy estimate; and an adaptation of the Andersson--Blue invariant-operator method, which turns that estimate into a bound for the horizon flux. Finally, a continuity argument yields an unconditional global-in-time Morawetz estimate, while a new energy estimate is obtained from the construction of a causal vectorfield which is Killing on the trapping set. The results proved here are restricted to scalar wave equations, corresponding to spin \(0\), in the range \(|a|/m\leq 0.75\). We expect this restriction to be technical, and the methods developed in this paper to extend to the Teukolsky equation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 7 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Alinhac,Energy multipliers for perturbations of the Schwarzschild metric, Comm

    S. Alinhac,Energy multipliers for perturbations of the Schwarzschild metric, Comm. Math. Phys. 288(2009), no. 1, 199–224

  2. [2]

    Andersson and P

    L. Andersson and P. Blue,Hidden symmetries and decay for the wave equation on the Kerr spacetime, Ann. of Math. (2)182(2015), no. 3, 787–853. 113

  3. [3]

    Bieri,An extension of the stability theorem of the Minkowski space in general relativity, Ph.D

    L. Bieri,An extension of the stability theorem of the Minkowski space in general relativity, Ph.D. thesis, ETH Z¨ urich, 2007

  4. [4]

    J. M. Bardeen, W. H. Press, and S. A. Teukolsky,Rotating black holes: Locally nonrotating frames, energy extraction, and scalar synchrotron radiation, Astrophys. J.178(1972), 347–369

  5. [5]

    Carter,Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields, Phys

    B. Carter,Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields, Phys. Rev.174(1968), 1559–1571

  6. [6]

    Carter,Hamilton–Jacobi and Schr¨ odinger separable solutions of Einstein’s equations, Comm

    B. Carter,Hamilton–Jacobi and Schr¨ odinger separable solutions of Einstein’s equations, Comm. Math. Phys.10(1968), 280–310

  7. [7]

    Cederbaum and S

    C. Cederbaum and S. Jahns,Geometry and topology of the Kerr photon region in the phase space, Gen. Relativity Gravitation51(2019), no. 6, Paper No. 79, 29 pp

  8. [8]

    Christodoulou,The nonlinear stability of rotating black holes, inSurveys in Differential Geometry, Vol

    D. Christodoulou,The nonlinear stability of rotating black holes, inSurveys in Differential Geometry, Vol. XXVII: Geometry and Physics, International Press, Somerville, MA, 2024, pp. 1–123

  9. [9]

    Christodoulou,Nonlinear nature of gravitation and gravitational-wave experiments, Phys

    D. Christodoulou,Nonlinear nature of gravitation and gravitational-wave experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett.67(1991), 1486–1489

  10. [10]

    Christodoulou,The global initial value problem in general relativity, in V

    D. Christodoulou,The global initial value problem in general relativity, in V. G. Gurzadyan, R. T. Jantzen, and R. Ruffini (eds.),The Ninth Marcel Grossmann Meeting, World Scientific, Singapore, 2002, pp. 44–54

  11. [11]

    Dafermos and I

    M. Dafermos and I. Rodnianski,The red-shift effect and radiation decay on black hole spacetimes, Comm. Pure Appl. Math.62(2009), no. 7, 859–919

  12. [12]

    Dafermos and I

    M. Dafermos and I. Rodnianski,A new physical-space approach to decay for the wave equation with applications to black hole spacetimes, inXVIth International Congress on Mathematical Physics, World Sci. Publ., Hackensack, NJ, 2010, pp. 421–432

  13. [13]

    Dafermos, I

    M. Dafermos, I. Rodnianski, and Y. Shlapentokh-Rothman,Decay for solutions of the wave equation on Kerr exterior spacetimes III: The full subextremal case|a|< M, Ann. of Math. (2)183 (2016), no. 3, 787–913

  14. [14]

    Dafermos, G

    M. Dafermos, G. Holzegel, I. Rodnianski, and M. Taylor,Quasilinear wave equations on Kerr black holes in the full subextremal range|a|< M, arXiv:2410.03639

  15. [15]

    Blanchet and T

    L. Blanchet and T. Damour,Radiative gravitational fields in general relativity. I. General structure of the field outside the source, Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A320(1986), 379–430

  16. [16]

    Dyatlov,Asymptotics of linear waves and resonances with applications to black holes, Comm

    S. Dyatlov,Asymptotics of linear waves and resonances with applications to black holes, Comm. Math. Phys.335(2015), no. 3, 1445–1485

  17. [17]

    Finster, N

    F. Finster, N. Kamran, J. Smoller, and S.-T. Yau,Decay of solutions of the wave equation in the Kerr geometry, Comm. Math. Phys.264(2006), no. 2, 465–503

  18. [18]

    Giorgi, S

    E. Giorgi, S. Klainerman, and J. Szeftel,Wave equations estimates and the nonlinear stability of slowly rotating Kerr black holes, arXiv:2205.14808

  19. [19]

    He and S

    L. He and S. Klainerman,Whiting transform and flux estimates for solutions of wave equations in Kerr, in preparation

  20. [20]

    Hintz,Nonlinear stability of subextremal Kerr black holes, arXiv:2606.28253

    P. Hintz,Nonlinear stability of subextremal Kerr black holes, arXiv:2606.28253. 114

  21. [21]

    H¨ ormander,Lectures on Nonlinear Hyperbolic Differential Equations, Math´ ematiques & Applications, vol

    L. H¨ ormander,Lectures on Nonlinear Hyperbolic Differential Equations, Math´ ematiques & Applications, vol. 26, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997

  22. [22]

    L. M. A. Kehrberger,The case against smooth null infinity I: Heuristics and counter-examples, Ann. Henri Poincar´ e23(2022), no. 3, 829–921

  23. [23]

    Klainerman and J

    S. Klainerman and J. Szeftel,Global non-linear stability of Schwarzschild spacetime under polarized perturbations, Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 210, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2020

  24. [24]

    Klainerman and J

    S. Klainerman and J. Szeftel,Construction of GCM spheres in perturbations of Kerr, Ann. PDE8 (2022), no. 2, Paper No. 17, 153 pp

  25. [25]

    Klainerman and J

    S. Klainerman and J. Szeftel,Effective results in uniformization and intrinsic GCM spheres in perturbations of Kerr, Ann. PDE8(2022), no. 2, Paper No. 18, 89 pp

  26. [26]

    Klainerman and J

    S. Klainerman and J. Szeftel,Kerr stability for small angular momentum, Pure Appl. Math. Q.19 (2023), no. 3, 791–1678

  27. [27]

    Klainerman and J

    S. Klainerman and J. Szeftel,Brief introduction to the nonlinear stability of Kerr, Pure Appl. Math. Q.20(2024), no. 4, 1721–1761

  28. [28]

    Lindblad and M

    H. Lindblad and M. Tohaneanu,A local energy estimate for wave equations on metrics asymptotically close to Kerr, Ann. Henri Poincar´ e21(2020), no. 11, 3659–3726

  29. [29]

    Ma,Uniform energy bound and Morawetz estimate for extreme components of spin fields in the exterior of a slowly rotating Kerr black hole II: Linearized gravity, Comm

    S. Ma,Uniform energy bound and Morawetz estimate for extreme components of spin fields in the exterior of a slowly rotating Kerr black hole II: Linearized gravity, Comm. Math. Phys.377(2020), no. 3, 2489–2551

  30. [30]

    Marzuola, J

    J. Marzuola, J. Metcalfe, D. Tataru, and M. Tohaneanu,Strichartz estimates on Schwarzschild black hole backgrounds, Comm. Math. Phys.293(2010), no. 1, 37–83

  31. [31]

    Ma and J

    S. Ma and J. Szeftel,Energy-Morawetz estimates for the wave equation in perturbations of Kerr, arXiv:2410.02341

  32. [32]

    Ma and J

    S. Ma and J. Szeftel,Energy-Morawetz estimates for Teukolsky equations in perturbations of Kerr, arXiv:2603.23437

  33. [33]

    Millet,Optimal decay for solutions of the Teukolsky equation on the Kerr metric for the full sub-extremal range, arXiv:2302.06946

    P. Millet,Optimal decay for solutions of the Teukolsky equation on the Kerr metric for the full sub-extremal range, arXiv:2302.06946

  34. [34]

    C. S. Morawetz,The decay of solutions of the exterior initial-boundary value problem for the wave equation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math.14(1961), 561–568

  35. [35]

    Shlapentokh-Rothman,Quantitative mode stability for the wave equation on the Kerr spacetime, Ann

    Y. Shlapentokh-Rothman,Quantitative mode stability for the wave equation on the Kerr spacetime, Ann. Henri Poincar´ e16(2015), no. 1, 289–345

  36. [36]

    Shlapentokh-Rothman and R

    Y. Shlapentokh-Rothman and R. Teixeira da Costa,Boundedness and decay for the Teukolsky equation on Kerr in the full subextremal range|a|< M: Frequency space analysis, arXiv:2007.07211

  37. [37]

    Shlapentokh-Rothman and R

    Y. Shlapentokh-Rothman and R. Teixeira da Costa,Boundedness and decay for the Teukolsky equation on Kerr in the full subextremal range|a|< M: Physical space analysis, arXiv:2302.08916

  38. [38]

    Shen,Construction of GCM hypersurfaces in perturbations of Kerr, Ann

    D. Shen,Construction of GCM hypersurfaces in perturbations of Kerr, Ann. PDE9(2023), no. 2, Paper No. 11, 142 pp. 115

  39. [39]

    Shen,Stability of the Minkowski space with minimal decay, arXiv:2310.07483

    D. Shen,Stability of the Minkowski space with minimal decay, arXiv:2310.07483

  40. [40]

    Shen,Exterior stability of Minkowski spacetime with borderline decay, arXiv:2405.00735, accepted in Ann

    D. Shen,Exterior stability of Minkowski spacetime with borderline decay, arXiv:2405.00735, accepted in Ann. Sci. ´Ec. Norm. Sup´ er

  41. [41]

    Stogin,Nonlinear wave dynamics in black hole spacetimes, arXiv:2603.14638

    J. Stogin,Nonlinear wave dynamics in black hole spacetimes, arXiv:2603.14638

  42. [42]

    Tataru and M

    D. Tataru and M. Tohaneanu,A local energy estimate on Kerr black hole backgrounds, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN (2011), no. 2, 248–292

  43. [43]

    Teo,Spherical photon orbits around a Kerr black hole, Gen

    E. Teo,Spherical photon orbits around a Kerr black hole, Gen. Relativity Gravitation35(2003), no. 11, 1909–1926

  44. [44]

    B. F. Whiting,Mode stability of the Kerr black hole, J. Math. Phys.30(1989), no. 6, 1301–1305. 116