Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 55 references

For thermally isolated quantum systems, fluctuation theorems for two energy differences recover the nonadiabaticity parameter and excess work, yielding a stronger Second-Law bound than Jarzynski’s equality.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 01:42 UTC pith:UZDHWZQN

load-bearing objection Solid quantum extension of Jarzynski 2020 that finally interprets X and Y and derives the strong work bound from an IFT.

arxiv 2607.09615 v1 pith:UZDHWZQN submitted 2026-07-10 cond-mat.stat-mech quant-ph

Fluctuation theorems for thermally isolated driven quantum systems: nonadiabaticity, excess work and strong inequalities

J. V. M. Steimetz , M. Campisi , M. V. S. Bonan\c{c}a This is my paper
classification cond-mat.stat-mech quant-ph PACS 05.70.Ln05.30.-d03.65.Yz
keywords fluctuation theoremsnonadiabaticity parameterexcess workthermally isolated systemsquantum thermodynamicsSecond Lawrelative entropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

When a quantum system is driven while thermally isolated, ordinary work fluctuation theorems give only a weak lower bound on average work. This paper defines two stochastic quantities X and Y from the same pair of energy measurements that appear in the usual two-point scheme, proves detailed and integral fluctuation theorems for both, and shows that their averages are exactly the nonadiabaticity parameter (relative entropy between the actual final state and the adiabatically evolved state) and the excess work. Because X equals the work performed in an imaginary cyclic completion of the protocol, the nonadiabaticity parameter becomes a concrete measure of irreversibility. An integral theorem for a rescaled version of Y then produces the thermodynamic inequality W − W_ise ≥ 0, which is strictly stronger than the free-energy bound that follows from the Jarzynski equality and saturates only for quasistatic isentropic driving.

Core claim

The averages of the two stochastic quantities introduced by Jarzynski are identical to the nonadiabaticity parameter A = D[ρ(τ) ∥ ρ_ad(λ_τ)] and the excess work W_ex = W − W_ad. Consequently the work absorbed in the cyclic counterpart of any protocol satisfies W_c = β^{-1} A, and the integral fluctuation theorem for the rescaled Y at the isentropic temperature implies the strong bound W_th_ex ≥ 0.

What carries the argument

The pair of stochastic quantities X ≡ E_nf(λ_0) − E_ni(λ_0) and Y ≡ E_nf(λ_τ) − E_ni(λ_τ) together with their time-reversed counterparts; their fluctuation theorems follow from micro-reversibility once the reverse process is started from the adiabatic (respectively Gibbs) state, and their averages are evaluated by relating the two-point probabilities to the relative entropy and the energy difference between actual and adiabatic final states.

Load-bearing premise

Every energy eigenspace keeps a constant degree of degeneracy throughout the driving, so that no level crossings or degeneracy lifting occur.

What would settle it

Compute A and W_c independently for a driven quantum system that has no level crossings (for example a non-integrable Ising chain) and check whether β W_c equals A for a range of protocol durations; any systematic deviation would refute the claimed identity.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript expands Jarzynski's 2020 integral fluctuation theorem for thermally isolated systems by deriving the corresponding detailed fluctuation theorem for the stochastic quantity X, together with additional detailed and integral theorems for a second quantity Y, all within the quantum two-point measurement scheme under Hamiltonian evolution from a Gibbs state. It supplies a physical interpretation of X and Y by proving that their averages equal the nonadiabaticity parameter A = D[ρ(τ)∥ρ_ad(λ_τ)] and the excess work W_ex = W - W_ad, respectively, and shows that the work absorbed in the cyclic counterpart of a process satisfies W_c = β^{-1} A. From the IFT for Y evaluated at the isentropic inverse temperature eta-bar the authors obtain the strong inequality W_th_ex ≥ 0 (the thermodynamic minimal-work principle). Connections to Thomson's formulation, the minimal-work principle, time-reversal asymmetry and coherence/transition decompositions of irreversibility are discussed, and the results are illustrated numerically on a non-integrable Ising chain and analytically for systems with globally expanding/contracting spectra.

Significance. The central equalities β⟨X⟩ = A and ⟨Y⟩ = W_ex, the identification W_c = β^{-1} A, and the derivation of W_th_ex ≥ 0 from an integral fluctuation theorem constitute a clean and useful clarification of the thermodynamics of thermally isolated driven quantum systems. The work supplies the missing physical interpretation of the quantities introduced by Jarzynski, places them on the same footing as the familiar dissipated work, and shows how a stronger Second-Law bound than W - ΔF ≥ 0 follows directly from a fluctuation theorem once the isentropic reference is used. The derivations rest on standard tools (two-point measurements, micro-reversibility, the constant-degeneracy adiabatic theorem and relative entropy) and are corroborated by explicit numerical checks on a non-integrable Ising chain; these strengths make the paper a solid contribution to quantum fluctuation relations and non-equilibrium thermodynamics.

minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II and VIII] The constant-degeneracy assumption (no level crossings or degeneracy lifting) is stated clearly in Sec. II and used in Eqs. (8), (34) and (58), and is correctly flagged as a limitation for future work in Sec. VIII. A brief forward reference in the abstract or introduction would help readers immediately appreciate the scope.
  2. [Sec. VI A] In Sec. VI A the eight-point argument that A quantifies irreversibility is persuasive but somewhat lengthy; a short summary paragraph that isolates the operational definition (recoverability of all observables by a supplementary adiabatic process) would improve readability without changing the content.
  3. [Sec. VII] Figures 3–6 are clear, yet the captions could explicitly state that the linear fits recover the theoretically expected slopes (β J_m and 1) within numerical error, reinforcing the verification of the DFTs.
  4. [References] A few bibliographic entries contain minor typos (e.g., "terhmodynamics", "Stocahstic"); a final proof-reading pass would eliminate them.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: central equalities and inequalities follow by direct calculation from two-point measurements, unitary evolution, and the constant-degeneracy adiabatic theorem.

full rationale

The paper defines stochastic quantities X and Y via the standard two-point energy measurement scheme (Eq. 4), proves the associated IFTs and DFTs by elementary manipulation of joint probabilities p(m,n) and their time-reversed counterparts under the chosen initial states (Secs. III–IV, Eqs. 13, 26, 36, 46), and then identifies the averages by expanding the definitions of relative entropy A ≡ D[ρ(τ)∥ρ_ad(λ_τ)] and excess work W_ex ≡ W − W_ad (Sec. V, Eqs. 52–58). These steps are self-contained algebraic identities that do not presuppose the target equalities; the adiabatic theorem is invoked only under the explicitly stated constant-degeneracy hypothesis (Eq. 8), which is a conventional external premise rather than a result derived from the paper’s own claims. The strong inequality W_th_ex ≥ 0 follows from Jensen’s inequality applied to the IFT for Y evaluated at the isentropic temperature (Eq. 83), again without circular input. Self-citations are limited to background fluctuation theorems (Tasaki–Crooks, Jarzynski 2020) that are independently established and not load-bearing for the new identifications. No fitted parameters, self-definitional loops, or uniqueness theorems imported from the authors appear. The derivation chain is therefore free of circularity under the paper’s stated assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard quantum-statistical assumptions (initial Gibbs state, unitary Hamiltonian evolution, two-point projective measurements) plus the adiabatic theorem for spectra of constant degeneracy. No free parameters are fitted; the only invented quantities are the stochastic variables X, Y already introduced by Jarzynski and the thermodynamic excess work W_th_ex defined for interpretive convenience.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Initial state is the Gibbs state Π_eta(λ_0); evolution is unitary under the time-dependent Hamiltonian H(λ_t).
    Standard setting for quantum fluctuation theorems; stated in Sec. II and used throughout.
  • domain assumption Degree of degeneracy of each eigenspace is constant in time (no level crossings or degeneracy lifting).
    Required for the adiabatic theorem in the form of Eq. (8) and for equating Tr{P_n(λ_t)} at different times; invoked in Sec. II and App. B.
  • standard math Quantum adiabatic theorem for possibly degenerate spectra with constant degeneracy: U_ad(t,0) P_n(λ_0) U_ad†(t,0) = P_n(λ_t).
    Cited from Rigolin & Ortiz (2012); used to define ρ_ad and to prove X = w_c.
  • standard math Micro-reversibility: the time-reversed evolution operator is Θ U†(τ,t) Θ†.
    Derived in App. A; standard for quantum Crooks-type theorems.
invented entities (1)
  • thermodynamic excess work W_th_ex ≡ W - W_ise no independent evidence
    purpose: To obtain from the IFT a work bound that matches the thermodynamic minimal-work principle based on entropy increase.
    Defined in Sec. V after introducing the isentropic temperature eta-bar; no independent experimental handle beyond the paper's own inequalities.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 30872 in / 2745 out tokens · 27702 ms · 2026-07-13T01:42:23.999080+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We expand on the ideas developed by C. Jarzynski in Physica A 552, 122077 (2020), where an integral fluctuation theorem was derived with the aim of obtaining thermodynamic inequalities stronger than those implied by the Jarzynski equality. Restricting ourselves to the quantum setting, we derive the corresponding detailed fluctuation theorem and additional detailed and integral fluctuation theorems; we also provide a clear physical interpretation of the stochastic quantities defined in the previous reference. Furthermore, we show that their averages are given by the nonadiabaticity parameter (i.e., the relative entropy between the final state after a finite-time driving protocol and the corresponding adiabatically evolved state) and the excess work (also known as inner friction). We elaborate on the inequalities derived from the fluctuation theorems and discuss their connection to irreversibility and formulations of the Second Law.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.09615 by J. V. M. Steimetz, M. Campisi, M. V. S. Bonan\c{c}a.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Illustration of the definition of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Illustration of the processes and quantities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Numerical verification of the DFT for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The quantities in Eq. (67) as functions of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    the cyclic counterpart

    to obtain it from fluctuation theorems. To this end, stochastic quantities were introduced and, although no clear physical interpretation could be given to them, an IFT was derived. However, the attempt to obtain the ∗ Contact author: joao.steimetz@dac.unicamp.br strong inequality from the IFT was only partially suc- cessful. Proper thermodynamic inequali...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    The system is initially in the stateρ(0) = Π β(λ0), on which the first measurement of the scheme is performed

  3. [3]

    No measurement is per- formed between this step and the next one

    A finite-time process is carried out with duration τ, taking the external parameter fromλ 0 toλ τ ac- cording to the protocolλ t. No measurement is per- formed between this step and the next one

  4. [4]

    thermodynamic excess work

    The external parameter is taken back toλ 0 via adi- abatic driving. At the end of this step, the second measurement of the scheme is performed. In order to apply the Tasaki-Crooks relation to this cyclic process, define the time-reversed process as follows: ˜1. The initial state is ΘΠ β(λ0)Θ†. A projective mea- surement of ΘH(λ 0)Θ† is performed. ˜2. An a...

  5. [5]

    III A and app

    Nonadiabaticity and work absorption From the definitions ofW c andw c, and from the fact thatw c =X(see Sec. III A and app. B), we haveW c = ⟨wc⟩=⟨X⟩. Therefore, the following equation holds 10: Wc ≡W+W back ad =β −1D[ρ(τ)||ρ ad(λτ)],(67) where we used Eq. (56). This means that the work ab- sorbed by the system under the imaginary cycle is pro- portional ...

  6. [6]

    imaginary cycles

    Nonadiabaticity and time-reversal asymmetry It is known that the dissipated workW diss also satisfies the relation [29–31] βWdiss =D[ρ(t)||Θ † ˜ρ(τ−t)Θ],∀t∈[0, τ].(69) In the equation above, ˜ρ(τ−t) = ˜U(τ−t,0)˜ρ(0) ˜U †(τ− t,0) = ˜U(τ−t,0)ΘΠ β(λτ)Θ† ˜U †(τ−t,0) is the state at timeτ−tin the time-reversed process, which for this equation starts at ˜ρ(0) =...

  7. [7]

    unwanted

    Nonadiabaticity, coherence and transitions Only in this section, we assume the projectorsP n(λ) satisfy Tr{Pn(λt)}= 1,∀t∈[0, τ], i.e., the spectrum is non-degenerate at all times. In this context, Ref. [32] clarifies the role of coherence and transitions in entropy production by showing that the dissipated workW diss = β−1D[ρ(τ)||Π β(λτ)] can be decompose...

  8. [8]

    The nonadiabaticity parameter as a quantifier of irreversibility In the last few subsections, we have been exploring the comparison between the dissipated work and the nonadi- abaticity parameter. The reason for this is that the dissi- pated work is a well-established quantifier of irreversibil- ity that yields the thermodynamic entropy production under c...

  9. [9]

    The nonadiabaticity parameterA=β⟨X⟩is the average of a quantity that satisfies both an inte- gral and a detailed fluctuation theorem, as shown in Sec. III. Since fluctuation theorems are strongly related to the idea of irreversibility, so are the quan- tities that satisfy them

  10. [10]

    VI A); 3.Ais equal to a measure of the time-reversal asymmetry of the imaginary cycles, as shown in Sec

    The nonadiabaticity parameter is proportional to the work absorbed by the system during the imag- inary cycle, a quantity we argued quantifies irre- versibility (see Sec. VI A); 3.Ais equal to a measure of the time-reversal asymmetry of the imaginary cycles, as shown in Sec. VI A 2

  11. [11]

    Without appealing to any particular definition of entropy, one may define reversibility in the follow- ing way. A reversible process is such that, after it is carried out, there exists a supplementary process 12 that returns all physically relevant observables of the system and its surroundings to their initial val- ues. In the case of thermally isolated ...

  12. [12]

    Indeed, by its very definition, Asatisfies this requirement

    A good quantifier of irreversibility should be able to capture the reversible case by yielding zero for adiabatic processes. Indeed, by its very definition, Asatisfies this requirement

  13. [13]

    The nonadiabaticity parameter measures the dis- tinguishability between the actual stateρ(τ) of the system and the stateρ ad(λτ) that would be achieved under a reversible process, i.e., it mea- sures the breaking of reversibility; 12 Of course, this supplementary process must follow the laws of Physics. For example, for a thermally isolated system, we can...

  14. [14]

    transitionless

    Just asW diss, the nonadiabaticity parameter can be decomposed into a term due to coherence gen- eration and a term due to population mismatch (see Sec. VI A 3). However, the population mis- match forW diss is measured against a state that is generally never achieved by the unitary dynamics, while forAit is measured against the state achieved under adiaba...

  15. [15]

    unwanted

    For slow processes, the leading contribution toA is the change in diagonal entropy [32], which has been shown under fairly general conditions to ex- hibit some properties of the entropy production from standard Thermodynamics [33]. However, the change in diagonal entropy corresponds only to the coherence termD[ρ(τ)||∆ρ(τ)], thus ignoring the contributions...

    2023

  16. [16]

    Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium equality for free energy dif- ferences, Phys

    C. Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium equality for free energy dif- ferences, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 2690 (1997)

    1997

  17. [17]

    G. E. Crooks, Entropy production fluctuation theorem and the nonequilibrium work relation for free energy dif- ferences, Phys. Rev. E60, 2721 (1999)

    1999

  18. [18]

    Campisi, P

    M. Campisi, P. H¨ anggi, and P. Talkner, Colloquium: Quantum fluctuation relations: Foundations and applica- tions, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 771 (2011), arXiv:1012.2268

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  19. [19]

    Jarzynski, Fluctuation relations and strong inequal- ities for thermally isolated systems, Physica A552, 122077 (2020)

    C. Jarzynski, Fluctuation relations and strong inequal- ities for thermally isolated systems, Physica A552, 122077 (2020). 15 The configuration considered is a system in contact with a heat bath at temperatureT

    2020

  20. [20]

    A. E. Allahverdyan and T. M. Nieuwenhuizen, Minimal work principle: Proof and counterexamples, Phys. Rev. E71, 046107 (2005)

    2005

  21. [21]

    Seifert, First and second law of terhmodynamics at strong coupling, Phys

    U. Seifert, First and second law of terhmodynamics at strong coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 020601 (2016)

    2016

  22. [22]

    Jarzynski, Stochastic and macroscopic thermodynam- ics of strongly coupled systems, Phys

    C. Jarzynski, Stochastic and macroscopic thermodynam- ics of strongly coupled systems, Phys. Rev. X7, 011008 (2017)

    2017

  23. [23]

    Strasberg and M

    P. Strasberg and M. Esposito, Stocahstic thermodynam- ics in the strong coupling regime: an unambiguous ap- proach based on coarse graining, Phys. Rev. E95, 062101 (2017)

    2017

  24. [24]

    Perarnau-Llobet, H

    M. Perarnau-Llobet, H. Wilming, A. Riera, R. Gallego, and J. Eisert, Strong coupling corrections in quantum thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 120602 (2018). 19

    2018

  25. [25]

    Talkner and P

    P. Talkner and P. H¨ anggi, Colloquium: Statistical me- chanics and thermodynamics at strong coupling: quan- tum and classical, Rev. Mod. Phys.92, 041002 (2020)

    2020

  26. [26]

    O. Diba, H. J. D. Miller, J. Iles-Smith, and A. Nazir, Quantum work statistics at strong reservoir coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 190401 (2024)

    2024

  27. [27]

    Strasberg and A

    P. Strasberg and A. Winter, First and second law of quan- tum thermodynamics: a consistent derivation based on a microscopic definition of entropy, PRX Quantum2, 030202 (2021)

    2021

  28. [28]

    Rigolin and G

    G. Rigolin and G. Ortiz, Adiabatic theorem for quan- tum systems with spectral degeneracy, Phys. Rev. A85, 062111 (2012)

    2012

  29. [29]

    Wang and M

    Z. Wang and M. B. Plenio, Necessary and sufficient con- dition for quantum adiabatic evolution by unitary control fields, Physical Review A93, 052107 (2016)

    2016

  30. [30]

    K. Xu, Y. Wang, M. B. Plenio, J. Du,et al., Break- ing the quantum adiabatic speed limit by jumping along geodesics, Science Advances7, eax3800 (2021)

    2021

  31. [31]

    Rigolin and G

    G. Rigolin and G. Ortiz, Adiabatic perturbation theory and geometric phases for degenerate systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 170406 (2010)

    2010

  32. [32]

    Rigolin and G

    G. Rigolin and G. Ortiz, Degenerate adiabatic perturba- tion theory: Foundations and applications, Phys. Rev. A 90, 022104 (2014)

    2014

  33. [33]

    Campisi, False onsager relations, EPL (Europhysics Letters)142, 30002 (2023)

    M. Campisi, False onsager relations, EPL (Europhysics Letters)142, 30002 (2023)

    2023

  34. [34]

    G. E. Crooks, Entropy production fluctuation theorem and the nonequilibrium work relation for free energy dif- ferences, Phys. Rev. E60, 2721–2726 (1999)

    1999

  35. [35]

    Tasaki, Jarzynski relations for quantum systems and some applications, arXiv preprint cond-mat/0009244 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cond-mat/0009244 (2000)

    H. Tasaki, Jarzynski relations for quantum systems and some applications, arXiv preprint cond-mat/0009244 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cond-mat/0009244 (2000)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.cond-mat/0009244 2000

  36. [36]

    Talkner and P

    P. Talkner and P. H¨ anggi, The tasaki–crooks quantum fluctuation theorem, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.40, F569 (2007), arXiv:0705.1252

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  37. [37]

    Campisi, P

    M. Campisi, P. Talkner, and P. H¨ anggi, Fluctuation the- orems for continuously monitored quantum fluxes, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 140601 (2010)

    2010

  38. [38]

    Strasberg,Quantum Stochastic Thermodynamics: Foundations and Selected Applications, Oxford Graduate Texts (Oxford University Press, 2022)

    P. Strasberg,Quantum Stochastic Thermodynamics: Foundations and Selected Applications, Oxford Graduate Texts (Oxford University Press, 2022)

    2022

  39. [39]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information(Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    2011

  40. [40]

    Vedral, The role of relative entropy in quantum infor- mation theory, Rev

    V. Vedral, The role of relative entropy in quantum infor- mation theory, Rev. Mod. Phys.74, 197 (2002)

    2002

  41. [41]

    A. E. Allahverdyan and T. M. Nieuwenhuizen, A mathe- matical theorem as the basis for the second law: Thom- son’s formulation applied to equilibrium, Physica A305, 542 (2002)

    2002

  42. [42]

    Vaikuntanathan and C

    S. Vaikuntanathan and C. Jarzynski, Dissipation and lag in irreversible processes, Europhys. Lett.87, 60005 (2009)

    2009

  43. [43]

    Esposito and C

    M. Esposito and C. V. den Broeck, Second law and lan- dauer principle far from equilibrium, Europhys. Lett.95, 40004 (2011)

    2011

  44. [44]

    Kawai, J

    R. Kawai, J. M. R. Parrondo, and C. V. den Broeck, Dis- sipation: The phase-space perspective, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 080602 (2007)

    2007

  45. [45]

    J. M. R. Parrondo, C. V. den Broeck, and R. Kawai, Entropy production and the arrow of time, New J. Phys. 11, 073008 (2009)

    2009

  46. [46]

    Rubino, G

    G. Rubino, G. Manzano, L. A. Rozema, P. Walther, J. M. R. Parrondo, and ˇC. Brukner, Inferring work by quantum superposing forward and time-reversal evolu- tions, Phys. Rev. Research4, 013208 (2022)

    2022

  47. [47]

    Francica, J

    G. Francica, J. Goold, and F. Plastina, Role of coher- ence in the nonequilibrium thermodynamics of quantum systems, Phys. Rev. E99, 042105 (2019)

    2019

  48. [48]

    Polkovnikov, Microscopic diagonal entropy and its connection to basic thermodynamic relations, Ann

    A. Polkovnikov, Microscopic diagonal entropy and its connection to basic thermodynamic relations, Ann. Phys. 326, 486 (2011)

    2011

  49. [49]

    Campisi, Statistical mechanical proof of the second law of thermodynamics based on volume entropy, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics39, 181 (2008)

    M. Campisi, Statistical mechanical proof of the second law of thermodynamics based on volume entropy, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics39, 181 (2008)

    2008

  50. [50]

    Tasaki, Statistical mechanical derivation of the second law of thermodynamics, arXiv preprint cond- mat/0009206 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cond- mat/0009206 (2000)

    H. Tasaki, Statistical mechanical derivation of the second law of thermodynamics, arXiv preprint cond- mat/0009206 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cond- mat/0009206 (2000)

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.cond- 2000

  51. [51]

    O’Donovan, P

    P. O’Donovan, P. Strasberg, K. Modi, J. Goold, and M. T. Mitchison, Quantum master equation from the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, Phys. Rev. B112, 014312 (2025)

    2025

  52. [52]

    M. E. J. Newman,Computational Physics(CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2013)

    2013

  53. [53]

    J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano,Modern Quantum Me- chanics, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2017)

    2017

  54. [54]

    Messiah,Quantum Mechanics(Dover Publications, 1999)

    A. Messiah,Quantum Mechanics(Dover Publications, 1999)

    1999

  55. [55]

    Plastina, A

    F. Plastina, A. Alecce, T. J. G. Apollaro, G. Falcone, G. Francica, F. Galve, N. Lo Gullo, and R. Zambrini, Irreversible work and inner friction in quantum thermo- dynamic processes, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 260601 (2014)

    2014