Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 41 references

A council of specialized LLM agents can generate realistic household electricity demand profiles by enforcing cultural, temporal, and physical constraints in a staged pipeline.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 09:44 UTC pith:QHL2PSAM

load-bearing objection Solid open multi-agent pipeline for synthetic residential loads; shape recovery is real, magnitude recovery is not, and that gap is already owned by the authors. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.10720 v1 pith:QHL2PSAM submitted 2026-07-12 cs.AI cs.LGcs.MA

WattCouncil: Context-Aware Household Energy Scenario Generation With Governed LLMs

Mohannad Takrouri , Nicolas M. Cuadrado A. , Martin Tak\'a\v{c} This is my paper
classification cs.AI cs.LGcs.MA
keywords Synthetic energy data generationLarge Language ModelsMulti-agent systemsHousehold electricity consumptionGoverned data generationSmart grid analytics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Smart-grid research needs high-resolution household load data, but privacy rules, regulation, and collection costs keep that data scarce. This paper argues that a governed multi-agent system of large language models can fill the gap by producing controlled, scenario-aware synthetic demand profiles. Separate agents generate household structure, weather context, and hourly consumption, while auditors check cultural plausibility and physical consistency and a controller accepts, partially rewrites, or fully regenerates each stage. Conditioning on household composition, occupancy, season, and environment yields daily routines whose shapes track real Irish smart-meter data across demographic groups. The result is a modular generator for exploratory analysis and benchmarking when real traces cannot be shared.

Core claim

WattCouncil establishes that household electricity demand can be produced as structured, auditable scenarios by a council of role-specialized LLM agents operating under explicit cultural, temporal, and physical constraints, rather than by a single unconstrained model or a pure physical simulator. The staged pipeline with controller-mediated accept, partial-regenerate, or full-regenerate decisions yields seasonal daily profiles whose temporal shapes correlate with real CER smart-meter measurements across selected demographic groups, even while absolute magnitudes remain systematically mismatched.

What carries the argument

The LLM Council: a three-stage governed pipeline in which a Generator proposes schema-constrained JSON artifacts, Cultural and Physical Auditors return severity-scored reports, and a Controller decides ACCEPT, REGENERATE PARTIAL (Editor then Approver), or REGENERATE FULL, optionally recording corrective rules. This machinery converts open-ended language-model sampling into constrained, reproducible energy-scenario synthesis.

Load-bearing premise

The claim rests on the premise that a few survey attributes—household size, house type, and composition—plus the models’ built-in cultural knowledge are enough to condition generation so the resulting load shapes fairly represent real residential behavior.

What would settle it

Generate profiles for a held-out demographic group or a second country’s smart-meter dataset that supplies comparable socio-demographic labels, then measure whether seasonal Pearson correlations stay in the reported 0.57–0.84 range and whether magnitude errors shrink or grow; a sharp drop in shape correlation or systematic timing failures would falsify transferable demand-structure capture.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Researchers can produce controlled synthetic household load data when privacy or cost blocks access to real high-resolution measurements.
  • Downstream demand shapes stay stable when LLM weather is replaced by Typical Meteorological Year data, so weather modules can be swapped modularly.
  • Scenario diversity—different family structures, seasons, and occupancy regimes—can be generated under the same explicit governance rules.
  • Closing the remaining magnitude gap requires stronger physical determinants such as dwelling-envelope properties, appliance ratings, and HVAC efficiency.
  • Open pipeline code lets others condition generation on new regions or richer attribute sets.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same generate–audit–control pattern could synthesize other privacy-sensitive behavioral time series, such as mobility or water-use traces, under domain-specific constraints.
  • A hybrid design that lets LLMs handle occupancy and activity while a physics layer scales absolute kWh may outperform pure language-model generation on magnitude fidelity.
  • Restoring more of the original survey attributes the authors deliberately dropped could reduce the bias they flag and improve cross-demographic fidelity.
  • Coupling the council to extreme-weather generators would enable stress-testing of heating and cooling peaks that typical-year weather deliberately omits.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. WattCouncil proposes a governed multi-agent LLM pipeline that generates synthetic household electricity demand scenarios under explicit cultural, temporal, and physical constraints. Generation is decomposed into three modular stages (household structure/occupancy, weather, consumption) with role-specialized agents (generator, cultural/physical auditors, editor, approver, controller), schema validation, severity-scored audits, and bounded regeneration. The framework is evaluated against the Irish CER smart-meter dataset (4232 households) by conditioning on five survey-derived demographic groups and comparing seasonally aggregated mean daily load shapes; Pearson correlations of 0.57–0.84 are reported alongside large magnitude errors (MAPE 62–94%). Ablations compare LLM-generated weather to TMY inputs and show demand-shape robustness to weather source. Open-source code is released.

Significance. The paper addresses a genuine bottleneck in smart-grid ML research: scarce high-resolution, privacy-safe household load data with socio-demographic context. The multi-agent governance design (explicit roles, auditable JSON artifacts, rule memory, modular weather substitution) is a concrete engineering contribution beyond single-prompt LLM generation, and the open code plus end-to-end execution traces support reproducibility. If the shape-level temporal alignment holds under broader conditioning and the magnitude gap is closed or clearly scoped, WattCouncil would be a useful scenario generator for exploratory analysis and benchmarking. Credit is due for the clean weather ablation (Figure 5, Table 4) and for openly reporting both correlations and large MAPE rather than cherry-picking metrics.

major comments (4)
  1. Table 3 and Figure 3: The central claim that profiles “reproduce daily and seasonal demand structures fairly well” rests on Pearson r = 0.57–0.84 for seasonally aggregated group means. Simultaneously MAPE is 62–94% and MAE/RMSE are large relative to the plotted 0.2–1.5 kWh scale. Shape similarity of population-mean diurnal curves is a weak test of context-aware fidelity; any reasonable occupancy schedule can produce morning/evening peaks. The paper acknowledges omitted physical determinants (Conclusion) but still frames the result as strong temporal alignment. Either (i) report household-level (not only group-mean) shape metrics under matched survey vectors, or (ii) restate the claim strictly as “plausible diurnal timing under coarse demographic conditioning,” with magnitude mismatch as a first-class limitation rather than a secondary note.
  2. §4.1.1 and Table 2: Evaluation uses only five hand-selected CER groups defined by three attributes (household size, house type, composition). Limitations §6 point 5 correctly notes that reducing the larger CER metadata set “could introduce bias,” yet no sensitivity analysis over alternative attribute sets or over the remaining survey variables is provided. Because generation is conditioned on the same coarse labels later used for comparison, it remains unclear whether the observed correlations demonstrate behavioral fidelity or generic Irish-style occupancy narratives. A load-bearing fix is either broader conditioning (or an explicit ablation that adds/removes attributes) or a hold-out comparison against households whose full survey vectors were never shown to the pipeline.
  3. §5.2 and Figure 5: The weather-sourcing ablation shows high demand-shape correlations (r ≈ 0.74–0.98) between LLM weather and TMY, with differences mainly in uncertainty-band width. Combined with the muted summer demand and frequent summer regenerations (HVAC heating disabled), this indicates that Stage-3 load shapes are driven primarily by occupancy/activity narrative and governance constraints rather than physically grounded weather–load coupling. For a framework positioned as context- and environment-aware, this is a material result: either strengthen physical determinants (as the Conclusion itself proposes) or qualify the “environmental conditions” claim so that readers do not over-interpret weather as a causal driver of the reported profiles.
  4. §3.1 and Table 1: Governance is presented as ensuring reproducibility via pinned models, schemas, and severity scores (LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH). Free parameters (role temperatures τ, max regeneration attempts, severity thresholds, selected groups) are not systematically ablated for their effect on final load statistics. The single end-to-end trace (§5.3) is informative but insufficient to establish that the council’s decisions are stable across seeds or model swaps. At minimum, report variance of key metrics (peak hour, daily total, r vs CER) under repeated runs with fixed vs varied τ and regeneration budgets, so that “governed” is an empirical claim rather than an architectural assertion.
minor comments (5)
  1. Figure 3: Axis scales and smoothness differ markedly between real and synthetic curves; the caption notes aggregation differences but a common y-scale (or dual-axis with explicit sample sizes) would make magnitude bias visually clearer.
  2. Table 1: Model names and approximate scales are given, but exact API versions / snapshot dates are not; for a reproducibility-oriented pipeline these should be pinned in the text or repository README.
  3. §4.2.1: Seasonal definitions (Northern Hemisphere calendar months) are standard but should note that CER spans July 2009–Dec 2010, so winter aggregates two partial winters; a short sensitivity check would help.
  4. Related Work: Prior LLM energy-synthesis papers ([2], [36], [8]) are cited; a short explicit comparison table (conditioning variables, governance, evaluation metrics) would sharpen the novelty claim.
  5. Typos / polish: “WattCouncilas” spacing (Abstract/Intro), “approver( REGENERATE PARTIAL )” formatting, and occasional missing spaces around citations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: CER attributes condition generation while CER loads serve only as an external benchmark; self-citation is non-load-bearing background.

full rationale

WattCouncil is a governed multi-agent LLM pipeline for synthetic household load generation, not a first-principles derivation that claims to predict quantities from fitted or self-defined inputs. Stage-1 conditioning uses three survey-derived CER attributes (household size, house type, composition; Table 2) to define groups; the half-hourly CER load series themselves are never fed into the generators and appear only later as an external comparison target (Section 4, Table 3, Figure 3). Pearson r, MAE/RMSE/MAPE therefore measure agreement between independently generated profiles and held-out real measurements, not a quantity forced by construction. The weather ablation replaces LLM weather with independent TMY data from pvlib and recovers essentially the same demand shapes (Figure 5, high r), showing the pipeline is not tautological with respect to its weather inputs. The authors’ prior arXiv note [36] is cited only in Related Work as methodological lineage; it is not invoked as a uniqueness theorem, uniqueness result, or load-bearing premise for the governance logic or the CER evaluation claims. No parameters are fitted to CER loads and then re-labeled as predictions; no self-definitional loops, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known empirical patterns as novel organization appear in the derivation chain. The paper is self-contained against the external CER benchmark. Score is 1 solely to register the minor, non-load-bearing self-reference.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that role-specialized LLMs plus simple severity-based control can enforce cultural and physical plausibility sufficiently for shape-level fidelity, plus a handful of free design choices (temperatures, group selection, regeneration budget) that are not derived from first principles.

free parameters (4)
  • role temperatures τ
    Generator τ=0.7, auditors/approver τ=0.3, editor/controller τ=0.4 chosen by hand to balance diversity vs. consistency; no sensitivity sweep reported.
  • max regeneration attempts
    Hard-coded limit of 3 attempts per stage; affects acceptance rate and summer runtime.
  • selected CER groups (5 of many)
    Only the five most frequent size/type/composition combinations retained; authors note possible selection bias.
  • severity thresholds (LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH)
    Auditor severity scale is qualitative; controller decision rules map HIGH to full regenerate without quantitative calibration.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption LLM cultural knowledge of Irish social norms is accurate enough for occupancy and appliance schedules
    Invoked throughout Stages 1 and 3; cultural auditor relies on it without external validation beyond CER aggregate shapes.
  • domain assumption Physical constraints (no heating in summer, realistic power draws) can be enforced by natural-language auditor prompts
    Physical auditor and controller guidance in §3.1 and execution logs; summer HVAC failures show the axiom is only partially reliable.
  • domain assumption Uniform weather across Ireland is an acceptable approximation
    Stated in §5.1 and Limitations; used for both LLM and TMY paths.
  • ad hoc to paper Schema-compliant JSON plus severity scores constitute sufficient governance for reproducibility
    Core design claim of the council architecture (§3.1).
invented entities (2)
  • WattCouncil multi-agent governance pipeline no independent evidence
    purpose: Decompose synthetic energy generation into audited stages with accept/partial/full regenerate decisions
    The named system and its role set are introduced by the paper; independent evidence is limited to the CER comparison and ablations reported herein.
  • scoped rule memory for recurring failure patterns no independent evidence
    purpose: Store corrective instructions across regenerations
    Mentioned as optional versioned artifact; no external validation.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 20670 in / 2864 out tokens · 43103 ms · 2026-07-14T09:44:58.214020+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The accelerating shift toward low-carbon power systems, together with the widespread adoption of behind-the-meter technologies such as rooftop solar and electric vehicles, is placing new operational and analytical demands on electricity grids. At the same time, smart-grid research increasingly relies on machine learning (ML), yet progress is constrained by limited access to high-resolution household energy data due to privacy concerns, regulatory barriers, and collection costs. This work presents WattCouncil, a data-generation framework in which household electricity demand is generated by a council of Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents operating in specialized roles to generate, audit, and validate structured energy scenarios under explicit cultural, temporal, and physical constraints. Rather than acting as static predictors, these agents serve as adaptive decision-makers within a governed pipeline. Motivated by studies highlighting the importance of contextual factors in energy use, our framework produces context-sensitive daily routines through a guided reasoning process that incorporates household composition, temporal factors, and environmental conditions. We evaluate the generated profiles against the detailed CER dataset, which contains over a year of load measurements for 4232 households together with survey-based socio-economic information. We further assess the consistency of the framework through ablation studies. Source code is available at https://github.com/Singularity-AI-Lab/wattcouncil

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.10720 by Martin Tak\'a\v{c}, Mohannad Takrouri, Nicolas M. Cuadrado A..

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: WattCouncil governance and decision flow. A gen￾erator proposes schema-constrained JSON artifacts at each stage. Stage-specific auditors validate cultural plausibility (Stages 1 and 3) and physical consistency (all stages). A con￾troller applies fixed decision rules to either accept, partially regenerate via constrained editing and approval, or fully re￾generate. environmental constraints across all stages… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Three-stage household energy generation pipeline [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison between CER dataset and WattCouncil seasonal daily profiles. We generate daily profiles using available data from the 5 groups in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: LLM-based vs TMY weather comparison. This figure shows a visual comparison of the average daily per-season profiles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Impact of weather sourcing on household energy consumption. Comparison of hourly electricity demand profiles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Andargie, and Elie Azar

    Abdulrahim Ali, Min Lin, Maedot S. Andargie, and Elie Azar. 2022. Demograph- ics as determinants of building occupants’ indoor environmental perceptions: insights from a machine learning incremental modeling and analysis approach. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering36, 4 (2022), 04022017

    2022

  2. [2]

    Mahathir Almashor, Yusuke Miyashita, Sam West, and Thi Van Dai Dong. 2024. Can Private LLM Agents Synthesize Household Energy Consumption Data?. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Future and Sustainable Energy Systems(Singapore, Singapore)(e-Energy ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 664–668. doi:10.1145/3...

    work page doi:10.1145/3632775.3661993 2024

  3. [3]

    Kyle Anderson, Adrian Ocneanu, Diego Benitez, Derrick Carlson, Anthony Rowe, and Mario Bergés. 2012. BLUED: A Fully Labeled Public Dataset for Event-Based Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring Research. InProceedings of the 2nd KDD Workshop on Data Mining Applications in Sustainability (SustKDD). ACM, Beijing, China, 1–5

    2012

  4. [4]

    Anderson, Clifford W

    Kevin S. Anderson, Clifford W. Hansen, William F. Holmgren, Adam R. Jensen, Mark A. Mikofski, and Anton Driesse. 2023. pvlib python: 2023 project update. Journal of Open Source Software8, 92 (2023), 5994. doi:10.21105/joss.05994

    doi:10.21105/joss.05994 2023

  5. [5]

    Nipun Batra, Manoj Gulati, Amarjeet Singh, and Mani B Srivastava. 2013. It’s Different: Insights into home energy consumption in India. InProceedings of the 5th ACM workshop on embedded systems for energy-efficient buildings. ACM, Rome, Italy, 1–8

    2013

  6. [6]

    Christian Beckel, Wilhelm Kleiminger, Romano Cicchetti, Thorsten Staake, and Silvia Santini. 2014. The ECO data set and the performance of non- intrusive load monitoring algorithms. InProceedings of the 1st ACM Confer- ence on Embedded Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings(Memphis, Tennessee) (BuildSys ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York,...

    doi:10.1145/2674061.2674064 2014

  7. [7]

    Grant Buster, Pavlo Pinchuk, Jacob Barrons, Ryan McKeever, Aaron Levine, and Anthony Lopez. 2024. Supporting Energy Policy Research with Large Language Models.Energy and AI18 (Dec. 2024), 100431. arXiv:2403.12924 [cs] doi:10.1016/j.egyai.2024.100431

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.egyai.2024.100431 2024

  8. [8]

    Shaylin Chetty, Hai Le Vu, Hao Wang, and Russell Smyth. 2025. An LLM Frame- work for Inferring Household Energy Consumption Through Behaviour Simu- lation. InProceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation(Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, USA)(BuildSys ’25). Association for Co...

    doi:10.1145/3736425.3770093 2025

  9. [9]

    Tracey Crosbie. 2006. Household Energy Studies: The Gap between Theory and Method.Energy & Environment17, 5 (2006), 735–753. jstor:44397093

    2006

  10. [10]

    Carlos Cruz, Marcos Tostado-Véliz, Esther Palomar, and Ignacio Bravo. 2024. Pattern-driven behavior for demand-side management: An analysis of appliance use.Energy and Buildings308 (2024), 113988

    2024

  11. [11]

    Pengwei Du and Ning Lu. 2011. Appliance Commitment for Household Load Scheduling.IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid2, 2 (June 2011), 411–419. doi:10. 1109/TSG.2011.2140344

    arXiv 2011

  12. [12]

    2024.NVIDIA Earth2Studio

    Earth2Studio Contributors. 2024.NVIDIA Earth2Studio. https://github.com/ NVIDIA/earth2studio Accessed: 2026-01-27

    2024

  13. [13]

    Xin Gao, Qizhi Pei, Zinan Tang, Yu Li, Honglin Lin, Jiang Wu, Lijun Wu, and Conghui He. 2025. A Strategic Coordination Framework of Small LMs Matches Large LMs in Data Synthesis. InProceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Wanxiang Che, Joyce Nabende, Ekaterina Shutova, and Mohammad Ta...

    2025

  14. [14]

    Arnaud Grandjean, Jérôme Adnot, and Guillaume Binet. 2012. A review and an analysis of the residential electric load curve models.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews16, 9 (2012), 6539–6565

    2012

  15. [15]

    Zhifeng Guo, Jesse R O’Hanley, and Stuart Gibson. 2022. Predicting residential electricity consumption patterns based on smart meter and household data: A case study from the Republic of Ireland.Utilities Policy79 (2022), 101446

    2022

  16. [16]

    Ozgur Kayalica

    Denizhan Guven and M. Ozgur Kayalica. 2023. Analysing the determinants of the Turkish household electricity consumption using gradient boosting regression tree.Energy for Sustainable Development77 (2023), 101312

    2023

  17. [17]

    Jinwu Hu, Yufeng Wang, Shuhai Zhang, Kai Zhou, Guohao Chen, Yu Hu, Bin Xiao, and Mingkui Tan. 2025. Efficient Dynamic Ensembling for Multiple LLM Experts. arXiv:2412.07448 [cs.AI] https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.07448

    arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Rateb Jabbar, Esmat Zaidan, Ahmed ben Said, and Ali Ghofrani. 2021. Reshaping Smart Energy Transition: An Analysis of Human-Building Interactions in Qatar Using Machine Learning Techniques. arXiv:2111.08333 [cs] doi:10.48550/arXiv. 2111.08333

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Jones and Kevin J

    Rory V. Jones and Kevin J. Lomas. 2015. Determinants of high electrical energy demand in UK homes: Socio-economic and dwelling characteristics.Energy and Buildings101 (2015), 24–34

    2015

  20. [20]

    Andrej Karpathy. 2025. Karpathy/LLM-Council: LLM Council Works Together to Answer Your Hardest Questions. https://github.com/karpathy/llm-council. Accessed: 2026-01-27

    2025

  21. [21]

    Jack Kelly and William Knottenbelt. 2015. The UK-DALE dataset, domestic appliance-level electricity demand and whole-house demand from five UK homes. Scientific Data2, 1 (2015), 1–14

    2015

  22. [22]

    Zico Kolter and Matthew J

    J. Zico Kolter and Matthew J. Johnson. 2011. REDD: A public data set for energy disaggregation research. InWorkshop on data mining applications in sustainability (SIGKDD), San Diego, CA, Vol. 25. MIT, San Diego, CA, USA, 59–62

    2011

  23. [23]

    Ioannis Kostakis. 2020. Socio-demographic determinants of household electricity consumption: Evidence from Greece using quantile regression analysis.Current Research in Environmental Sustainability1 (2020), 23–30

    2020

  24. [24]

    Ciarán Lavin and Hannah Julienne. 2025. Household activities underlying res- idential electricity demand: who does what during the evening peak?Energy Efficiency18, 5 (2025), 43

    2025

  25. [25]

    Stephen Makonin, Fred Popowich, Lyn Bartram, Bob Gill, and Ivan V Bajić. 2013. AMPds: A public dataset for load disaggregation and eco-feedback research. In 2013 IEEE electrical power & energy conference. IEEE, IEEE, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, 1–6

    2013

  26. [26]

    Dafni Mora, Cristina Carpino, and Marilena De Simone. 2018. Energy Con- sumption of Residential Buildings and Occupancy Profiles. A Case Study in Mediterranean Climatic Conditions.Energy Efficiency11, 1 (Jan. 2018), 121–145. doi:10.1007/s12053-017-9553-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s12053-017-9553-0 2018

  27. [27]

    David Murray, Lina Stankovic, and Vladimir Stankovic. 2017. An electrical load measurements dataset of United Kingdom households from a two-year longitudinal study.Scientific Data4, 1 (2017), 1–12

    2017

  28. [28]

    A Najeeb, S Sridharan, AB Rao, SB Agnihotri, and Vinod Mishra. 2024. Deter- minants of residential electricity consumption in South, East and South East Asia: A systematic review.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews198 (2024), 114400

    2024

  29. [29]

    Larissa Nicholls and Yolande Strengers. 2015. Peak Demand and the ‘Family Peak’ Period in Australia: Understanding Practice (in)Flexibility in Households with Children.Energy Research & Social Science9 (2015), 116–124. doi:10.1016/j. erss.2015.08.018

    doi:10.1016/j 2015

  30. [30]

    2015.Customer-Led Network Revolution: Close-Down Report

    Northern Powergrid. 2015.Customer-Led Network Revolution: Close-Down Report. Technical Report. Ofgem. https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/publications/northern- powergrid-northeasts-customer-led-network-revolution-close-down-report Project Number: CLNR

    2015

  31. [31]

    Joon Sung Park, Joseph O’Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris, Percy Liang, and Michael S Bernstein. 2023. Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior. InProceedings of the 36th annual acm symposium on user interface software and technology. ACM, San Francisco, CA, USA, 1–22

    2023

  32. [32]

    Oliver Parson, Grant Fisher, April Hersey, Nipun Batra, Jack Kelly, Amarjeet Singh, William Knottenbelt, and Alex Rogers. 2015. Dataport and NILMTK: A building data set designed for non-intrusive load monitoring. In2015 ieee global conference on signal and information processing (globalsip). IEEE, IEEE, Virtual, 210–214

    2015

  33. [33]

    Hasan Rafiq, Prajowal Manandhar, Edwin Rodriguez-Ubinas, Juan David Barbosa, and Omer Ahmed Qureshi. 2023. Analysis of residential electricity consumption patterns utilizing smart-meter data: Dubai as a case study.Energy and Buildings 291 (2023), 113103

    2023

  34. [34]

    Sinsel, Rhea L

    Simon R. Sinsel, Rhea L. Riemke, and Volker H. Hoffmann. 2020. Challenges and Solution Technologies for the Integration of Variable Renewable Energy Sources—a Review.Renewable Energy145 (2020), 2271–2285. doi:10.1016/j.renene. 2019.06.147

    doi:10.1016/j.renene 2020

  35. [35]

    Zehao Song. 2024. CER Electricity Data Revised March 2012. doi:10.57760/ sciencedb.17619

    2024

  36. [36]

    Cuadrado, and Martin Takáč

    Mohannad Takrouri, Nicolás M. Cuadrado, and Martin Takáč. 2025. Knowl- edge Distillation from Large Language Models for Household Energy Modeling. arXiv:2502.03034 [cs.LG] https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.03034

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Zhen Tan, Dawei Li, Song Wang, Alimohammad Beigi, Bohan Jiang, Amrita Bhattacharjee, Mansooreh Karami, Jundong Li, Lu Cheng, and Huan Liu. 2024. Large Language Models for Data Annotation and Synthesis: A Survey. InPro- ceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Process- ing. Association for Computational Linguistics, Miami, F...

    doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.54 2024

  38. [38]

    Energy Information Administration (EIA)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2023. Residential Energy Con- sumption Survey (RECS) 2020. https://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/. Accessed: 2026-01-27

    2023

  39. [39]

    Zhuo Wei and Hao Wang. 2021. Characterizing Residential Load Patterns by Household Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors. InProceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems (e-Energy ’21). ACM, Italy, 244–248. doi:10.1145/3447555.3464867

    work page doi:10.1145/3447555.3464867 2021

  40. [40]

    Fusuo Xu, Dongdong Tian, Zhi Gao, and Jianshun Jensen Zhang. 2024. The Effects of Cool Materials, Façade Orientation, and Morphological Parameters on Energy Consumption at the Residential Neighborhood Scale.Building Simulation 17, 4 (April 2024), 525–542. doi:10.1007/s12273-023-1096-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s12273-023-1096-z 2024

  41. [41]

    Yujie Zhao. 2025. A Review of Renewable Energy and Power System Integration. Applied and Computational Engineering126 (01 2025), 10–15. doi:10.54254/2755- 2721/2025.20092

    work page doi:10.54254/2755- 2025