Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 68 references

Spinoptics equations show that axion fields and spacetime curvature both push high-frequency light off null geodesics in a helicity-dependent way.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 06:48 UTC pith:GOXATZPW

load-bearing objection Clean, general spinoptics equations for axion–Maxwell that cleanly separate axionic from gravitational helicity-dependent deflections; solid methods paper with illustrative examples.

arxiv 2607.11134 v1 pith:GOXATZPW submitted 2026-07-13 gr-qc hep-ph

Spinoptics in the presence of axion-like particles in curved spacetime

Tomoki Takeuchi , Tsutomu Kobayashi This is my paper
classification gr-qc hep-ph
keywords spinopticsaxion-like particlesgravitational spin Hall effectphoton trajectoriesaxion–Maxwell theorynull tetradphoton sphere
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

High-frequency light is usually said to travel along null geodesics, even when it couples to axion-like particles. This paper goes one order beyond that geometric-optics limit and derives the spinoptics equations that govern the next-order, helicity-dependent corrections. The equations are written for an arbitrary curved spacetime and an arbitrary axion profile. They show that the axion–photon interaction itself, not only spacetime curvature, produces a spin-Hall deflection of the ray. Concrete examples—light scattered by an axion clump in flat space, light scattered by a Schwarzschild black hole with axion hair, and circular orbits near a photon sphere—make the effect visible: trajectories acquire both polar and azimuthal shifts that reverse with helicity, and a radial gradient of the axion field can push rays off the photon sphere entirely. A sympathetic reader cares because any future detection of helicity-dependent light bending, or any precise modelling of black-hole shadows, must now include this axion contribution.

Core claim

The effective-action spinoptics equations for the axion–Maxwell system are valid in any curved spacetime and for any axion configuration. They produce O(λ) helicity-dependent deviations of photon trajectories from null geodesics that arise from the interaction of the photon’s spin with both spacetime curvature and the axion field.

What carries the argument

The effective action reduced to first sub-leading order in wavelength λ, whose Hamilton–Jacobi equation yields the ray Hamiltonian H = ½ p^{2} - λ B·p, with the axion contribution sitting inside the real vector Bμ. Characteristic curves of this Hamiltonian are the spinoptics rays.

Load-bearing premise

The axion is treated as a fixed background whose gradients stay gentle on the scale of the light’s wavelength, so back-reaction and rapid axion fluctuations can be ignored.

What would settle it

Solve the derived deviation equations for a known axion profile (for example the static radial hair around a Schwarzschild black hole) and check whether the predicted asymptotic polar and azimuthal shifts reverse with helicity and match the numerical size of the O(λ) terms.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper derives spinoptics equations for high-frequency electromagnetic waves coupled to a fixed axionic background in arbitrary curved spacetime, going beyond geometric optics via Frolov’s effective-action method. Starting from the complexified axion–Maxwell action, the authors retain next-to-leading terms in the wavelength expansion, obtain a modified Hamilton–Jacobi equation and transport equations for a complex null tetrad, and reduce the O(λ) trajectory corrections to a pair of deviation equations (76)–(77). The axion enters through an additional real contribution to the vector Bμ; the resulting force κμ (Eq. 54) produces helicity-dependent deviations from null geodesics that arise from both curvature and axion gradients. Representative solutions are given for an NFW axion clump in Minkowski space, a Schwarzschild black hole with axion hair, and the photon sphere of a static spherically symmetric metric; pure-gravity limits are recovered when ϕ = 0.

Significance. The work supplies a systematic, coordinate-independent extension of spinoptics to the axion–Maxwell system that is valid for arbitrary metrics and arbitrary axion profiles (subject only to the standard high-frequency assumptions λ/Lg, λ/Lϕ ≪ 1). It cleanly separates gravitational and axionic contributions to the O(λ) force, recovers known geometric-optics results, and demonstrates new qualitative effects—azimuthal scattering shifts and radial departures from the photon sphere—that are absent in pure gravity. These results open a concrete avenue for using black-hole shadows or polarized light deflection as probes of axion-like particles, and the parallel-transported versus axion-corrected tetrad construction is reusable for other spin-1 fields.

minor comments (4)
  1. In Sec. II D the authors note that the lμ component of m0μ appears to be missing from Ref. [60]; a short explicit comparison of the two expressions for the polarization transport would help the reader assess the difference.
  2. Figures 1–7 use illustrative values of λ (e.g., 3×10−2, 7×10−2) that are large enough for visual clarity but formally outside the strict λ ≪ L regime; a brief remark that the plots are schematic would avoid any misreading of the magnitude of the effect.
  3. The integration constant Ξ0 is set to zero for scattering problems (Sec. III); a one-sentence justification that this choice corresponds to the asymptotic matching of the polarization basis would make the initial-condition discussion self-contained.
  4. Appendix B generalizes the null tetrad to f ≠ h; a cross-reference from the photon-sphere discussion in Sec. IV to the general formula (B9) would improve navigability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: spinoptics equations are derived from the axion–Maxwell action via a controlled λ-expansion; examples solve those equations rather than recover fitted inputs.

full rationale

The load-bearing chain is self-contained. The Lagrangian (2) and complex action (4) are the standard axion–Maxwell theory; the high-frequency ansatz (5) and effective action (9)–(11) retain the next-to-leading O(λ) terms following Frolov’s external method [26], with the axion entering only through the real vector Bμ (10). The Hamilton–Jacobi equation (13)/(20), null-tetrad transport (47)–(48), force κμ (54), and final spinoptics system (60)–(63) are obtained by variation and tetrad algebra, not by defining the trajectory deviation in terms of itself. Geometric-optics recovery (λ→0) reproduces known null geodesics and polarization rotation [48,59,60] as a consistency check, not as an input that forces the O(λ) result. Sections III–IV and Appendix A solve the derived ODEs for chosen backgrounds (NFW clump, Schwarzschild hair, FLRW, photon sphere); parameters are set by hand for illustration and are not fitted to recover the same quantities as “predictions.” Self-citations are absent for uniqueness claims; the method citation [26] is external and the pure-gravity limits are re-derived. No self-definitional loop, fitted-input-as-prediction, or ansatz smuggled via author-overlapping uniqueness appears.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on standard GR, Maxwell theory, and the conventional axion–photon interaction; the only free numbers are illustrative parameters chosen by hand for the numerical examples. No new dynamical entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • m_ϕ, r_s, ρ_s (NFW axion clump)
    Chosen by hand (m_ϕ=1/10, r_s=1, ρ_s=1/100) solely to illustrate qualitative ray shifts; not fitted to data.
  • g ϕ̇_0 (axion hair amplitude)
    Set to 5×10^{-2} (and scanned) for visualization of Schwarzschild+axion trajectories; illustrative only.
  • λ (wavelength scale used in plots)
    Artificially enlarged (3×10^{-2} or 7×10^{-2}) for visualization; the analytic equations remain O(λ).
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption High-frequency (WKB) expansion: λ ≪ L_g, L_ϕ so that the effective action truncated at O(λ) captures the leading spinoptics correction.
    Stated at the opening of Sec. II and used to justify retention of only the first sub-leading terms.
  • domain assumption Axion field ϕ is a fixed, non-dynamical background (no back-reaction on the metric or on itself).
    Explicitly declared in Sec. II; allows the effective action to be written solely in terms of the Maxwell field.
  • domain assumption Standard axion–photon interaction Lagrangian L_int = −(g/4) ϕ F μν *F μν.
    Taken as the defining coupling of ALPs; no derivation from a more fundamental theory is required.
  • standard math Complex null tetrad can be chosen so that the axion-corrected parallel-transport equations (47)–(48) hold after residual gauge fixing.
    Follows from the residual freedom of the null tetrad and is verified by direct substitution.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 23064 in / 2489 out tokens · 26400 ms · 2026-07-14T06:48:41.572537+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the propagation of high-frequency electromagnetic waves coupled to an axionic scalar field in curved spacetime. By applying the effective action approach, we go beyond the standard geometric optics limit and derive spinoptics equations for the axion--Maxwell theory that are valid for arbitrary curved spacetimes and arbitrary axion profiles. These equations allow us to analyze helicity-dependent corrections to photon trajectories arising from the photon's interactions with both the axion field and spacetime curvature. We present representative examples to demonstrate how light trajectories deviate from null geodesics due to spinoptics effects in the presence of an axion field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.11134 by Tomoki Takeuchi, Tsutomu Kobayashi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: shows the solutions for L = 1/10 and L = 1/5. The parameters of the axion profile are given by mϕ = 1/10, rs = 1, and ρs = 1/100. We see that rays are shifted in both the y and z directions. The asymptotic values of rξθ and rξφ are shown as functions of L in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Asymptotic values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Ray trajectories passing through a spherical axion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The asymptotic values [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Ray trajectories passing by a Schwarzschild black [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Asymptotic values [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    axion-corrected

    satisfying the transport equations in the λ→0 limit: D0lµ 0 = 0,(64) (D0m0)µ = (D0n0)µ = 0,(65) whereD 0 :=l µ 0 ∇µ and (D 0v)α :=D 0vα − (g/2)εµνλαl0µϕ,νvλ. Evaluating the right-hand side of Eq. (60) using (ℓ µ 0 , nµ 0 , mµ 0 ,¯mµ 0), one can obtainO( λ) de- viations from a null geodesic. D. Parallel-transported basis The “axion-corrected” tetrad (ℓ µ 0...

  2. [2]

    The choice of Ξ 0 is discussed later

    parallel-propagated along the null geodesic, D0mµ 0 =D 0nµ 0 = 0.(66) Once a parallel-propagated null tetrad is obtained, we definem µ 0 andn µ 0 by mµ 0 =e −igϕ/2 (mµ 0 + Ξlµ 0 ),(67) nµ 0 =n µ 0 + ¯Ξmµ 0 + Ξ¯mµ 0 + Ξ¯Ξlµ 0 ,(68) where Ξ is a complex function that solves D0 e−igϕ/2Ξ =−m ν 0 e−igϕ/2 ,ν .(69) The general solution to this equation is given ...

  3. [3]

    relatively easily. Furthermore, although the spinoptics equations in the previous subsection look simpler when expressed in terms of the original axion- corrected basis, it turns out that the parallel-transported basis is more convenient for the purpose of formulating the deviation equations for a ray trajectory. Let us comment on the results in the geome...

  4. [4]

    ρp E2ρ2 −L 2f(ρ) − 1 E # dρ, (95) where cm := Z ∞ rm

    as- sociated to a null geodesic with the tangent vectorl µ 0 , we start with constructing a parallel-transported basis (l0,n 0,m 0, ¯m0) in the Schwarzschild spacetime. This can be done following Ref. [27]. (See Appendix B for a gen- eralization.) Without loss of generality, we may consider a null ray lying in the equatorial plane,θ=π/2. Then, lµ 0 can be...

  5. [5]

    improved

    We have κl = g 2a2 d2ϕ dη2 , κ= 0,(A5) showing thatX= 0 andX l ̸= 0. The deviation vector has only a tangential component,ξ µ =X llµ 0 , and thus we conclude that no helicity-dependent bending of light occurs in an FLRW universe. Appendix B: Complex null tetrad in general static and spherically symmetric spacetime In Sec. III, we only consider rays in the...

  6. [6]

    Misner, K.S

    C.W. Misner, K.S. Thorne and J.A. Wheeler, Gravitation, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco (1973). 1

    1973

  7. [7]

    Maggiore,Gravitational Waves

    M. Maggiore,Gravitational Waves. Vol. 1: Theory and Experiments, Oxford University Press (2007), 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570745.001.0001. 1

    doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570745.001.0001 2007

  8. [8]

    Balazs,Effect of a gravitational field, due to a rotating body, on the plane of polarization of an electromagnetic wave,Phys

    N.L. Balazs,Effect of a gravitational field, due to a rotating body, on the plane of polarization of an electromagnetic wave,Phys. Rev.110(1958) 236. 1

    1958

  9. [9]

    Plebanski,Electromagnetic Waves in Gravitational Fields,Phys

    J. Plebanski,Electromagnetic Waves in Gravitational Fields,Phys. Rev.118(1959) 1396

    1959

  10. [10]

    Dehnen,Gravitational faraday-effect,International Journal of Theoretical Physics7(1973) 467

    H. Dehnen,Gravitational faraday-effect,International Journal of Theoretical Physics7(1973) 467

    1973

  11. [11]

    Ishihara, M

    H. Ishihara, M. Takahashi and A. Tomimatsu, Gravitational Faraday Rotation Induced by a Kerr Black Hole,Phys. Rev. D38(1988) 472

    1988

  12. [12]

    Nouri-Zonoz,Gravoelectromagnetic approach to the gravitational Faraday rotation in stationary space-times, Phys

    M. Nouri-Zonoz,Gravoelectromagnetic approach to the gravitational Faraday rotation in stationary space-times, Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 024013 [gr-qc/9901011]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  13. [13]

    Kopeikin and B

    S. Kopeikin and B. Mashhoon,Gravitomagnetic effects in the propagation of electromagnetic waves in variable gravitational fields of arbitrary moving and spinning bodies,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 064025 [gr-qc/0110101]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  14. [14]

    Shoom,Gravitational Faraday and spin-Hall effects of light,Phys

    A.A. Shoom,Gravitational Faraday and spin-Hall effects of light,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 084007 [2006.10077]. 1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    Shoom,Gravitational Faraday and spin-Hall effects of light: Local description,Phys

    A.A. Shoom,Gravitational Faraday and spin-Hall effects of light: Local description,Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 024029 [2404.15934]. 1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Gosselin, A

    P. Gosselin, A. Berard and H. Mohrbach,Spin Hall effect of photons in a static gravitational field,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 084035 [hep-th/0603227]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  17. [17]

    Frolov and A.A

    V.P. Frolov and A.A. Shoom,Spinoptics in a stationary spacetime,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 044026 [1105.5629]. 1, 10

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  18. [18]

    Dolan,Higher-order geometrical optics for electromagnetic waves on a curved spacetime, 1801.02273

    S.R. Dolan,Higher-order geometrical optics for electromagnetic waves on a curved spacetime, 1801.02273. 1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    Oancea, C.F

    M.A. Oancea, C.F. Paganini, J. Joudioux and L. Andersson,An overview of the gravitational spin Hall effect,1904.09963. 1, 10

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1904

  20. [20]

    Andersson and M.A

    L. Andersson and M.A. Oancea,Spin Hall effects in the sky,Class. Quant. Grav.40(2023) 154002 [2302.13634]. 1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Yoo,Notes on Spinoptics in a Stationary Spacetime,Phys

    C.-M. Yoo,Notes on Spinoptics in a Stationary Spacetime,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 084005 [1207.6833]. 1, 10

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  22. [22]

    Yamamoto,Spin Hall effect of gravitational waves, Phys

    N. Yamamoto,Spin Hall effect of gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 061701 [1708.03113]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  23. [23]

    Andersson, J

    L. Andersson, J. Joudioux, M.A. Oancea and A. Raj, Propagation of polarized gravitational waves,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 044053 [2012.08363]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Dahal,Spin Optics for Gravitational Waves, Astronomy1(2022) 271 [2107.02761]

    P.K. Dahal,Spin Optics for Gravitational Waves, Astronomy1(2022) 271 [2107.02761]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    Kubota, S

    K.-i. Kubota, S. Arai and S. Mukohyama,Spin optics for gravitational waves lensed by a rotating object,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 044027 [2309.11024]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Kubota, S

    K.-i. Kubota, S. Arai, H. Motohashi and S. Mukohyama,Spin wave optics for gravitational waves lensed by a Kerr black hole,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 124011 [2408.03289]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Frolov and A.A

    V.P. Frolov and A.A. Shoom,Gravitational spinoptics in a curved space-time,JCAP10(2024) 039 [2406.17905]. 1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Dolan,Geometrical optics for scalar, electromagnetic and gravitational waves on curved spacetime,Int

    S.R. Dolan,Geometrical optics for scalar, electromagnetic and gravitational waves on curved spacetime,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D27(2017) 1843010 [1806.08617]. 1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  29. [29]

    Oancea, J

    M.A. Oancea, J. Joudioux, I.Y. Dodin, D.E. Ruiz, C.F. Paganini and L. Andersson,Gravitational spin Hall effect of light,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 024075 [2003.04553]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    Nishida,Optical Magnus effect on gravitational lensing,2603.15697

    Y. Nishida,Optical Magnus effect on gravitational lensing,2603.15697. 1

    arXiv

  31. [31]

    Frolov,Spinoptics in a curved spacetime,Phys

    V.P. Frolov,Spinoptics in a curved spacetime,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 064020 [2405.01777]. 1, 2, 3, 4, 10

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Frolov,Spinoptics in the Schwarzschild spacetime, JCAP12(2024) 051 [2410.19413]

    V.P. Frolov,Spinoptics in the Schwarzschild spacetime, JCAP12(2024) 051 [2410.19413]. 1, 6, 7, 8, 11

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Murk, D.R

    S. Murk, D.R. Terno and R. Vadapalli,Gravity-induced birefringence in spherically symmetric spacetimes,Phys. 13 Rev. D111(2025) 044001 [2408.02729]. 1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Dahal,Light propagation in Kerr spacetime,Eur

    P.K. Dahal,Light propagation in Kerr spacetime,Eur. Phys. J. Plus138(2023) 205 [2301.08250]. 1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    Frolov and A

    V.P. Frolov and A. Koek,Spinoptics in the Kerr spacetime: Polarized wave scattering,Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) 104081 [2503.19208]. 1, 5, 6, 10

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Alves, R.T

    K.S. Alves, R.T. Cavalcanti and S.E. Perez Bergliaffa, Light Deflection due to Spinoptic Effects in Parametrized and Spherically Symmetric Hairy Black Holes,2605.20524. 1, 11

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    Peccei and H.R

    R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn,CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.38(1977) 1440. 1

    1977

  38. [38]

    Peccei and H.R

    R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn,Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. D16(1977) 1791

    1977

  39. [39]

    Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys

    S. Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys. Rev. Lett.40 (1978) 223

    1978

  40. [40]

    Wilczek,Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys

    F. Wilczek,Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 279

    1978

  41. [41]

    Preskill, M.B

    J. Preskill, M.B. Wise and F. Wilczek,Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 127. 1

    1983

  42. [42]

    M. Dine, W. Fischler and M. Srednicki,A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion,Phys. Lett. B104(1981) 199. 1

    1981

  43. [43]

    Kim and G

    J.E. Kim and G. Carosi,Axions and the Strong CP Problem,Rev. Mod. Phys.82(2010) 557 [0807.3125]. 1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  44. [44]

    Di Luzio, M

    L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi and L. Visinelli, The landscape of QCD axion models,Phys. Rept.870 (2020) 1 [2003.01100]. 1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    Witten,Some Properties of O(32) Superstrings, Phys

    E. Witten,Some Properties of O(32) Superstrings, Phys. Lett. B149(1984) 351. 1

    1984

  46. [46]

    Arvanitaki, S

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper and J. March-Russell,String Axiverse,Phys. Rev. D81 (2010) 123530 [0905.4720]. 1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  47. [47]

    Abbott and P

    L.F. Abbott and P. Sikivie,A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 133. 1

    1983

  48. [48]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler,The Not So Harmless Axion, Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 137

    1983

  49. [49]

    Hui, J.P

    L. Hui, J.P. Ostriker, S. Tremaine and E. Witten, Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 043541 [1610.08297]. 1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  50. [50]

    Frieman, C.T

    J.A. Frieman, C.T. Hill, A. Stebbins and I. Waga, Cosmology with ultralight pseudo Nambu-Goldstone bosons,Phys. Rev. Lett.75(1995) 2077 [astro-ph/9505060]. 1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  51. [51]

    Kim and H.P

    J.E. Kim and H.P. Nilles,A quintessential axion,Phys. Lett. B553(2003) 1 [hep-ph/0210402]. 1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  52. [52]

    Harari and P

    D. Harari and P. Sikivie,Effects of a Nambu-Goldstone boson on the polarization of radio galaxies and the cosmic microwave background,Phys. Lett. B289(1992)

    1992

  53. [53]

    Fedderke, P.W

    M.A. Fedderke, P.W. Graham and S. Rajendran,Axion Dark Matter Detection with CMB Polarization,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 015040 [1903.02666]. 1, 10

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  54. [54]

    Landau, E.M

    L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshitz and L.P. Pitaevskii, Electrodynamics of Continuous Media, vol. 8 ofCourse of Theoretical Physics, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 2 ed. (1984). 1

    1984

  55. [55]

    Carroll,Quintessence and the rest of the world, Phys

    S.M. Carroll,Quintessence and the rest of the world, Phys. Rev. Lett.81(1998) 3067 [astro-ph/9806099]. 1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  56. [56]

    Lue, L.-M

    A. Lue, L.-M. Wang and M. Kamionkowski, Cosmological signature of new parity violating interactions,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 1506 [astro-ph/9812088]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  57. [57]

    B. Feng, M. Li, J.-Q. Xia, X. Chen and X. Zhang, Searching for CPT Violation with Cosmic Microwave Background Data from WMAP and BOOMERANG, Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 221302 [astro-ph/0601095]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  58. [58]

    G.-C. Liu, S. Lee and K.-W. Ng,Effect on cosmic microwave background polarization of coupling of quintessence to pseudoscalar formed from the electromagnetic field and its dual,Phys. Rev. Lett.97 (2006) 161303 [astro-ph/0606248]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  59. [59]

    Fujita, K

    T. Fujita, K. Murai, H. Nakatsuka and S. Tsujikawa, Detection of isotropic cosmic birefringence and its implications for axionlike particles including dark energy,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 043509 [2011.11894]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  60. [60]

    Komatsu,New physics from the polarized light of the cosmic microwave background,Nature Rev

    E. Komatsu,New physics from the polarized light of the cosmic microwave background,Nature Rev. Phys.4 (2022) 452 [2202.13919]. 1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  61. [61]

    Plascencia and A

    A.D. Plascencia and A. Urbano,Black hole superradiance and polarization-dependent bending of light,JCAP04(2018) 059 [1711.08298]. 1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  62. [62]

    Chway,Light Bending in Models with a Generic Scalar Field,1901.09760

    D. Chway,Light Bending in Models with a Generic Scalar Field,1901.09760

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1901

  63. [63]

    McDonald and L.B

    J.I. McDonald and L.B. Ventura,Optical properties of dynamical axion backgrounds,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 123503 [1911.10221]. 1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  64. [64]

    D. Blas, A. Caputo, M.M. Ivanov and L. Sberna,No chiral light bending by clumps of axion-like particles, Phys. Dark Univ.27(2020) 100428 [1910.06128]. 1, 10

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  65. [65]

    Schwarz, J

    D.J. Schwarz, J. Goswami and A. Basu,Geometric optics in the presence of axionlike particles in curved spacetime,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) L081306 [2003.10205]. 1, 5, 10

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  66. [66]

    Wald,General Relativity, Chicago Univ

    R.M. Wald,General Relativity, Chicago Univ. Pr., Chicago, USA (1984), 10.7208/chicago/9780226870373.001.0001. 2

    doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226870373.001.0001 1984

  67. [67]

    Perlick,Ray Optics, Fermat’s Principle, and Applications to General Relativity, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg (2000), 10.1007/3-540-46662-2

    V. Perlick,Ray Optics, Fermat’s Principle, and Applications to General Relativity, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg (2000), 10.1007/3-540-46662-2. 3

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-46662-2 2000

  68. [68]

    Navarro, C.S

    J.F. Navarro, C.S. Frenk and S.D.M. White,A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering, Astrophys. J.490(1997) 493 [astro-ph/9611107]. 7

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997