Robust topological oscillators govern a tunable phase transition to synchronized circadian rhythms

Chongbin Zheng; Evelyn Tang; Peter Thomas

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 79 references

Robust topological oscillators govern a tunable phase transition to synchronized circadian rhythms

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Synchronization of stochastic circadian oscillators is governed by the single-oscillator coherence R1.

desk verdict Careful modeling paper with a striking but not yet fully secured claim: the synchronization threshold appears controlled by single-oscillator coherence alone. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.13322 v1 pith:ZWMAH6ND submitted 2026-07-14 physics.bio-ph cond-mat.softcond-mat.stat-mech

Chongbin Zheng , Evelyn Tang , Peter Thomas This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.bio-phcond-mat.softcond-mat.stat-mech

keywords circadianrhythmKaiCsynchronizationstochasticoscillatortopologicalprotectionqualityfactorphasetransitionAsequestration

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks what determines when a population of noisy molecular clocks can synchronize into a robust circadian rhythm. It builds a population model by coupling topologically protected single-KaiC oscillators through KaiA sequestration, and finds a phase transition to sustained collective oscillations that depends only on the single-molecule coherence R1—the number of reliable cycles a lone oscillator completes before noise scrambles its phase. The transition occurs at R1 ≳ 1.96, independent of the thermodynamic force μ and the topological parameter ρ that produce R1. This matters because it means disparate experimental perturbations can be understood and controlled through a single emergent quantity: improving single-molecule coherence restores synchronization regardless of which biochemical step was disrupted.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing quantity is the single-oscillator coherence R1 = λI/λR, the ratio of the imaginary to the real part of the slowest-decaying eigenvalue of the single-KaiC transition-rate matrix; it counts the number of coherent oscillation cycles before stochastic decay. This coherence is produced by a topological mechanism: for ρ > 0, the phosphorylation dynamics in the two-site state space support protected edge currents that give rise to robust single-molecule oscillations. Coupling is introduced through KaiA sequestration: hexamers entering the dephosphorylation region instantaneously sequester six KaiA dimers, reducing the free KaiA that accelerates the phosphorylation-promoting transit

What would settle it

An experiment that measures the single-molecule coherence R1 of a specific KaiC variant and then maps the population-level phase boundary by varying μ (ATP/ADP ratio) and ρ (period mutants or Mg2+ concentration): if the boundary in this two-parameter plane is not a contour of constant R1 near ≈1.96, the central claim fails. Conversely, the predicted restoration of oscillations by compensatory changes that raise R1 (e.g., adding ATP to a KaiB-mutant-disrupted clock) is a direct test; if such restoration does not occur, the claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in the deterministic (N→∞) limit of a population of KaiC hexamers coupled by KaiA sequestration, the onset of synchronized oscillations is a supercritical Hopf bifurcation whose location in parameter space is a contour of constant single-oscillator coherence. The authors show numerically that the phase boundary collapses onto R1 ≈ 1.96 for a range of μ and ρ, and that finite-size scaling of the population coherence and timing error distinguishes the synchronous phase (power-law growth with copy number N) from the asynchronous phase (plateau at large N). They further find that the population period stays robust under changing KaiA concentration because the intrinsic

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that each KaiC hexamer instantaneously sequesters exactly six KaiA dimers upon entering the red (dephosphorylation) region and releases them on exit, with the phosphorylation-promoting rate decaying linearly with sequestered KaiA; if real sequestration kinetics are slower, nonlinear, or of different stoichiometry, the phase boundary may not collapse onto R1.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the claim is correct, experimental disruptions (KaiB mutants, extreme Mg2+, altered KaiA levels) that push the system into the asynchronous phase can be rectified by any manipulation that raises R1 above ≈1.96, even if it acts on a completely different biochemical process.
The predicted amplitude–period correlation for KaiC period mutants follows because longer periods correspond to larger ρ, hence larger R1; this matches existing observations and yields a testable quantitative relation.
The finite-N scaling results imply that in vivo (thousands of molecules), synchronization is a power-law-improving but finite phenomenon, and the timing error can be used experimentally to locate the phase boundary.
The robustness of the population period to changes in KaiA concentration is a direct consequence of the single-molecule period anchoring the collective timescale, offering a way to distinguish this mechanism from models without coherent single oscillators.
The framework provides a general strategy for designing reliable biochemical oscillators: tune the single-molecule coherence rather than the coupling strength.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The collapse of the phase boundary onto R1 suggests a design principle for synthetic clocks: instead of increasing coupling strength, one can engineer the individual oscillator's quality factor (e.g., via topological protection or energy input) to achieve robust synchronization.
The threshold R1 ≈ 1.96 might be a generic property of coupling via a shared resource: if so, similar collapse onto a single-molecule coherence should appear in other models of resource-mediated synchronization, a testable hypothesis beyond KaiC.
The subcritical Hopf at low KaiA predicts hysteresis: oscillatory states could persist at lower KaiA levels if the system is brought there from the synchronous phase, a concrete experiment that would discriminate the model from alternative descriptions.
One could test the prediction directly at the single-molecule level: measure R1 for engineered KaiC variants (via single-molecule phosphorylation traces) and check that the population phase boundary in (μ,ρ) space matches the R1 contour.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a thoughtful extension of the authors' topological KaiC model, adding KaiA sequestration, and it finds something interesting: over the parameter range explored, the population-level phase boundary tracks the single-oscillator coherence R1, not μ and ρ separately. The finite-N scaling and the supercritical-vs-subcritical bifurcation analysis are competently done, and the experimental comparisons are honest and qualitative. The paper deserves a serious referee.

What's new: the coupling mechanism itself (instantaneous sequestration of six KaiA dimers during dephosphorylation, linear slowing of γSE), the identification of R1≈1.96 as the threshold at cA=1, the divergent R∞ above vs plateau below, and the compensatory rescue prediction. These are concrete and testable.

What's good: the bifurcation analysis is careful — they check amplitude scaling to classify supercritical at high cA and subcritical at low cA with bistability. They use Gillespie for small N and a diffusion approximation for large N, and show they agree at N=500, which is a reasonable cross-check. The period robustness under cA and the comparison to van Zon and Mori models is useful. The paper is clear about what is assumption and what is result, and the appendix on estimating μ from ATP consumption is a nice touch.

Where I'd push: the central claim that the transition depends only on R1 is supported by a visual alignment of the Hopf boundary with an R1 contour over a rectangle μ,ρ∈[0,5]. That's not a proof. The coupling in Eq. (7) depends explicitly on μ and ρ through the rate differences and the red-region geometry, so exact collapse to an R1 level set is a non-generic property. A skeptic could reasonably suspect the result depends on the linear sequestration rule in Eq. (5) and the 6:1 stoichiometry. The paper would be much stronger with a sensitivity analysis — e.g., saturating Hill kinetics for γSE, vA=4 instead of 6, a small delay, or at least a numerical measure of how much the boundary deviates from the R1 contour as those choices vary. Without that, the universal-control claim is conditional.

Also, no code or data is released, and the full transition matrix is only in the earlier paper. For a computational modeling paper, releasing the matrix and simulation scripts would help others check the R1 collapse.

Other soft spots are minor: the diffusion approximation is used outside its formal validity regime, but they cross-check against Gillespie and note the caveat. The experimental comparisons are qualitative, which the paper acknowledges.

Bottom line: the paper is a good candidate for peer review. The right referee can ask for the sensitivity analysis and a quantitative collapse test. The core idea — single-oscillator coherence as the control parameter for collective synchronization — is interesting enough to warrant that investment.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper extends a previously proposed topological model of a single KaiC hexamer [44] by coupling many such stochastic oscillators through KaiA sequestration. The authors derive a deterministic rate equation (Eq. (7)) and study finite-N stochastic dynamics via Gillespie simulations and a diffusion approximation. Their central claim is that, at the standard KaiA concentration cA=1, the synchronization transition is controlled solely by the single-oscillator coherence R1, with a threshold R1≈1.96, independent of the individual parameters μ and ρ that determine R1. They report distinct finite-N scaling behavior above and below this transition, a bifurcation analysis identifying supercritical/subcritical Hopf transitions, qualitative agreement with several experiments (period–amplitude correlations, Mg2+/KaiB disruption), and a predicted compensatory rescue mechanism based on raising R1.

Significance. If the R1-only control claim is correct, the paper offers a substantial conceptual advance: it links single-molecule stochastic coherence—rooted in topological protection—to a population-level synchronization transition, and it yields falsifiable, parameter-free-in-spirit predictions (e.g., rescue by unrelated biochemical changes). The work is also notable for shipping explicit rate-equation and eigen-decomposition methods, careful Hopf-bifurcation classification, and a reproducible pipeline for finite-N scaling. The main limitation is that the central universality claim currently rests on a visual collapse of a numerically computed Hopf boundary onto an R1 contour over a finite parameter rectangle (μ,ρ∈[0,5]) and on one specific sequestration coupling form. The paper itself acknowledges model-specific assumptions in Appendices A and D. Thus the significance is conditional on robustness tests of the coupling rule and a quantitative assessment of the R1-only alignment.

major comments (3)

[§III A, Fig. 2(a), Eq. (7)] The claim that the transition depends only on R1, with threshold R1≈1.96, is not quantitatively supported. The Hopf boundary in Fig. 2(a) appears aligned with a level set of R1, but no error measure, collapse plot, or convergence test is provided. Because the coupling term in Eq. (7) contains the prefactor (γ/eρ − γ/e^{μ+ρ}) and depends on the red-region geometry through cseq_A, exact alignment with an R1 contour is non-generic. I request a quantitative analysis: e.g., compute the Hopf boundary on a fine grid, evaluate the deviation of that boundary from the R1=1.96 contour, and report whether the deviation is within numerical tolerance. Without this, 'depends only' is an overstatement.
[Appendix A, Eq. (5)] The central universal-control result is tied to a specific sequestration rule: instantaneous binding of six KaiA dimers per KaiC hexamer in the red region, with γSE varying linearly with free KaiA. The authors provide no sensitivity analysis. It is possible that the R1-only alignment is an artifact of this particular linear/instantaneous stoichiometric form. I recommend testing the phase boundary under alternative, still biologically plausible, coupling rules—e.g., Hill-type saturation in cfree_A, a finite sequestration time scale, or stoichiometry vA,i=4 instead of 6. If the Hopf boundary moves away from R1 contours under such perturbations, the headline mechanism loses support.
[§III B / Appendix D] The finite-N scaling results rely on the diffusion approximation at N=500, although the formal condition stated in Appendix D requires N∼10^7. The authors justify this by 'good agreement' with Gillespie simulations in Fig. 2(b,d), but this is a visual comparison. Since the scaling exponents and the plateau/asymptotic distinction are load-bearing for distinguishing the phases, I ask for a quantitative comparison of the diffusion approximation against Gillespie trajectories (e.g., relative error in RN or in the timing error as a function of N). This would also clarify the range of N over which the approximation is reliable.

minor comments (4)

[Appendix B, Eq. (10)] Typo: 'relexation' should be 'relaxation'.
[Fig. 4(c)] Comparison with the van Zon and Mori models would benefit from stating which parameter values were used for those models; otherwise the comparison may appear cherry-picked.
[Appendix G] The estimate of μ by equally dividing dissipated free energy among 364 reaction pairs is a strong assumption; it should be flagged as such in the main text when using the hatched region of Fig. 4(b).
[§III D] The subcritical Hopf bifurcation prediction at low cA is interesting but is only demonstrated for one parameter set; a short scan over (μ,ρ) would strengthen the claim that this behavior is generic in the asynchronous-to-synchronous transition.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the R1-only synchronization transition is a numerical model output, not a fitted input or a consequence of self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that the synchronization phase transition in the coupled KaiC population depends only on the single-oscillator coherence R1, with threshold R1 ≈ 1.96. This claim is not circular by construction. R1 is defined from the eigenvalues of the single-molecule transition matrix Ws (Eq. 9), while the population coupling depends on the sequestered-KaiA concentration cseq_A through Eqs. (5)-(7), involving the prefactor γ/e^ρ − γ/e^{μ+ρ} and the red-region occupancy v_A. There is no algebraic identity in the paper that forces the Hopf boundary of the coupled system to coincide with an R1 level set; the alignment is presented as a numerical finding from solving Eq. (7). Thus the threshold is an emergent output, not a fitted parameter or a renamed input. The import of the 196-state topological single-molecule model from the authors' own Ref. [44] is a self-citation, but it is legitimate prior work that is not used to forbid alternatives or to assert the new synchronization result; the phase-transition analysis is carried out in this paper. Experimental comparisons are qualitative and prospective rather than fitted to the model. The skeptical concern that the R1-only universality may not survive changes to the sequestration rule (Eq. 5) is a robustness/correctness question, not a circularity question. Therefore no specific circular step can be exhibited, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Markov-chain model inherited from [44], the specific KaiA-sequestration coupling rule, and mean-field averaging. The only free continuous parameters are μ, ρ, γ, cA; the R1 threshold (~1.96) is an emergent result, not an input.

free parameters (4)

μ (thermodynamic force) = 0–5 kBT; estimated 3.8–4.9 kBT in vivo (Appendix G)
Tunes single-oscillator coherence R1; not measured directly. Estimates are derived from ATP consumption experiments.
ρ (topological parameter) = [0,5]
Tunes the ratio of phosphorylation to internal transitions and thus R1; mapping to specific KaiC mutants is qualitative (longer period -> larger ρ).
γ (global rate scale) = Unspecified
Sets absolute transition rates; not given numerically, affects timescales but not dimensionless R1 or qualitative phase behavior.
cA (total KaiA concentration) = 1 at standard condition; varied in Fig. 4
Coupling strength; normalized to experimental conditions where KaiA and KaiC concentrations are roughly equal.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Single KaiC hexamer dynamics is a 196-state Markov chain with rates given by the topological model of Ref [44] (Fig. 1b).
Imported without re-derivation from the authors' prior paper; no validation of the transition network is provided here.
ad hoc to paper KaiA sequestration: each hexamer instantaneously sequesters six KaiA dimers after entering the red region of state space and releases them on exit; γSE decreases linearly with cseq_A (Eq. 5).
Chosen to couple oscillators; qualitatively motivated by experiments [30,55] but the linear, instantaneous form is a simplification and not derived.
domain assumption Mean-field / well-mixed coupling: all KaiC molecules in the population experience the same free KaiA concentration cfree_A(X).
Standard rate-equation treatment; ignores spatial heterogeneity and finite-size effects beyond the N scaling.
domain assumption Conversion from state (x,y) to % P-KaiC uses f_i = (x + y − xy/6)/6, assuming random independent placement of phosphorylated sites among six monomers.
Defines observable; not validated against detailed hexamer structure.
standard math The slowest-decaying eigenvalue pair of W_s is complex with negative real part; R1 = λI/λR is a valid coherence measure.
Standard spectral characterization of stochastic oscillators; holds for the simulated parameter range.
ad hoc to paper Diffusion approximation is valid at N=500 despite formal requirement N~10^7.
Appendix D justifies by agreement with Gillespie at selected parameters; not proven generally.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Robust topological oscillators govern a tunable phase transition to synchronized circadian rhythms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZWMAH6ND

@misc{pith2026260713322,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Robust topological oscillators govern a tunable phase transition to synchronized circadian rhythms},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZWMAH6ND}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.13322}
}

read the original abstract

While synchronization has been well-studied in deterministic oscillators, most underlying oscillators are stochastic in both natural and man-made systems. Yet, the effects of intrinsic stochasticity remain poorly understood. Here, we develop a new mechanism for synchronizing circadian KaiC molecules that have topologically protected cycles. We find a phase transition to synchronization that depends only on the single-oscillator coherence, across a range of molecular changes that determine this coherence. Examining both mesoscopic and macroscopic numbers relevant for cellular and in vitro conditions respectively, we find different scaling properties above and below the phase transition. Our results shed light on several existing experiments and further predict that external changes can be offset by compensatory changes that improve the single-oscillator coherence - demonstrating a tunable pathway between stochastic single oscillators and their robust collective rhythms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.13322 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** FIG. 1. Single-molecule oscillations of KaiC phosphorylation level are synchronized through KaiA sequestration. (a) Individ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Single-oscillator coherence governs a novel phase transition to synchronization and determines finite- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Experimental modifications shape population-level behavior by tuning single-molecule transitions rates. (a) In our [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. KaiC oscillations and collective period are robust under changing KaiA concentration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Oscillation amplitude near phase boundaries reveal qualitatively different bifurcations. (a) At the standard KaiA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Oscillation amplitude increases with both the thermo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

[44]

Zheng and E

C. Zheng and E. Tang, A topological mechanism for ro- bust and efficient global oscillations in biological net- works, Nature Communications 15, 6453 (2024)

2024
[1]

Gratz, B

D. Gratz, B. Onal, A. Dalic, and T. J. Hund, Synchro- nization of pacemaking in the sinoatrial node: a mathe- matical modeling study, Frontiers in Physics6, 63 (2018)

2018
[2]

Richard, B

P. Richard, B. Teusink, M. B. Hemker, K. Van Dam, and H. V. Westerhoff, Sustained oscillations in free-energy state and hexose phosphates in yeast, Yeast 12, 731 (1996)

1996
[3]

Wolf and R

J. Wolf and R. Heinrich, Effect of cellular interaction on glycolytic oscillations in yeast: a theoretical investiga- tion, Biochemical Journal 345, 321 (2000)

2000
[4]

Richard, B

P. Richard, B. Teusink, H. V. Westerhoff, and K. van Dam, Around the growth phase transition s. cerevisiae’s make-up favours sustained oscillations of intracellular metabolites, FEBS letters 318, 80 (1993)

1993
[5]

Singer, Striving for coherence, Nature 397, 391 (1999)

W. Singer, Striving for coherence, Nature 397, 391 (1999)

1999
[6]

K. M. Stiefel and G. B. Ermentrout, Neurons as oscilla- tors, Journal of neurophysiology 116, 2950 (2016)

2016
[7]

Kuramoto, Self-entrainment of a population of cou- pled non-linear oscillators, in International Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics, edited by H

Y. Kuramoto, Self-entrainment of a population of cou- pled non-linear oscillators, in International Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics, edited by H. Araki (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidel- berg, 1975) pp. 420–422

1975

Show all 79 references

[8]

Kuramoto, Chemical turbulence, in Chemical oscilla- tions, waves, and turbulence (Springer, 1984) pp

Y. Kuramoto, Chemical turbulence, in Chemical oscilla- tions, waves, and turbulence (Springer, 1984) pp. 111– 140

1984
[9]

Pikovsky, M

A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths, Synchroniza- tion, Cambridge university press 12 (2001)

2001
[10]

J. A. Acebr´ on, L. L. Bonilla, C. J. P´ erez Vicente, F. Ri- tort, and R. Spigler, The kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena, Reviews of modern physics 77, 137 (2005)

2005
[11]

Y. Park, S. Heitmann, and G. B. Ermentrout, The utility of phase models in studying neural synchroniza- tion, Computational models of brain and behavior , 493 (2017)

2017
[12]

Y. Park, K. M. Shaw, H. J. Chiel, and P. J. Thomas, The infinitesimal phase response curves of oscillators in piecewise smooth dynamical systems, European Journal of Applied Mathematics 29, 905 (2018)

2018
[13]

Kreider and P

M. Kreider and P. J. Thomas, On the relation between infinitesimal shape response curves and phase-amplitude reduction for single and coupled limit-cycle oscillators, SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems 23, 1636 (2024)

2024
[14]

Neiman, Synchronizationlike phenomena in coupled stochastic bistable systems, Physical Review E 49, 3484 (1994)

A. Neiman, Synchronizationlike phenomena in coupled stochastic bistable systems, Physical Review E 49, 3484 (1994)

1994
[15]

S. K. Han, T. G. Yim, D. Postnov, and O. Sosnovtseva, Interacting coherence resonance oscillators, Physical Re- view Letters 83, 1771 (1999)

1999
[16]

Freund, A

J. Freund, A. Neiman, and L. Schimansky-Geier, Ana- lytic description of noise-induced phase synchronization, EPL (Europhysics Letters) 50, 8 (2000)

2000
[17]

Callenbach, P

L. Callenbach, P. H¨ anggi, S. J. Linz, J. A. Freund, and L. Schimansky-Geier, Oscillatory systems driven by noise: Frequency and phase synchronization, Physical Review E 65, 051110 (2002)

2002
[18]

G. S. Medvedev, Synchronization of coupled stochas- tic limit cycle oscillators, Physics Letters A 374, 1712 (2010)

2010
[19]

Zakharova, J

A. Zakharova, J. Kurths, T. Vadivasova, and A. Koseska, Analysing dynamical behavior of cellular networks via stochastic bifurcations, PloS one 6, e19696 (2011)

2011
[20]

Zakharova, A

A. Zakharova, A. Feoktistov, T. Vadivasova, and E. Sch¨ oll, Coherence resonance and stochastic synchro- nization in a nonlinear circuit near a subcritical hopf bi- furcation, The European Physical Journal Special Topics 222, 2481 (2013)

2013
[21]

R. M. Amro, B. Lindner, and A. B. Neiman, Phase dif- fusion in unequally noisy coupled oscillators, Physical re- view letters 115, 034101 (2015)

2015
[22]

Z. Deng, S. Arsenault, L. Mao, and J. Arnold, Measuring synchronization of stochastic oscillators in biology, Jour- nal of Physics: Conference Series 750, 012001 (2016)

2016
[23]

Kreider, B

M. Kreider, B. Lindner, and P. J. Thomas, Q-functions, synchronization, and arnold tongues for coupled stochas- tic oscillators, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 35 (2025)

2025
[24]

Kreider, P

M. Kreider, P. J. Thomas, and Y. Li, Artificial neural network solver for fokker-planck and koopman eigenfunc- tions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.20339 (2025)

2025 arXiv
[25]

Garcia-Ojalvo, M

J. Garcia-Ojalvo, M. B. Elowitz, and S. H. Strogatz, Modeling a synthetic multicellular clock: repressilators coupled by quorum sensing, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101, 10955 (2004)

2004
[26]

Nandi, S

A. Nandi, S. G, R. B. Singh, and R. Ramaswamy, Effec- tive mechanisms for the synchronization of stochastic os- cillators, Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 76, 041136 (2007)

2007
[27]

T.-L. To, M. A. Henson, E. D. Herzog, and F. J. Doyle, A molecular model for intercellular synchronization in the mammalian circadian clock, Biophysical journal 92, 3792 (2007)

2007
[28]

J. Kim, P. Heslop-Harrison, I. Postlethwaite, and D. G. Bates, Stochastic noise and synchronisation during dic- tyostelium aggregation make camp oscillations robust, PLoS computational biology 3, e218 (2007)

2007
[29]

S. E. Cohen and S. S. Golden, Circadian rhythms in cyanobacteria, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Re- views 79, 373 (2015)

2015
[30]

A. G. Chavan, J. A. Swan, J. Heisler, C. Sancar, D. C. Ernst, M. Fang, J. G. Palacios, R. K. Spangler, C. R. Bagshaw, S. Tripathi, et al., Reconstitution of an intact clock reveals mechanisms of circadian timekeeping, Sci- ence 374, eabd4453 (2021)

2021
[31]

Nakajima, K

M. Nakajima, K. Imai, H. Ito, T. Nishiwaki, Y. Mu- rayama, H. Iwasaki, T. Oyama, and T. Kondo, Recon- stitution of circadian oscillation of cyanobacterial KaiC phosphorylation in vitro, science 308, 414 (2005)

2005
[32]

M. J. Rust, J. S. Markson, W. S. Lane, D. S. Fisher, and E. K. O’Shea, Ordered phosphorylation governs oscilla- 14 tion of a three-protein circadian clock, Science 318, 809 (2007)

2007
[33]

T. Mori, D. R. Williams, M. O. Byrne, X. Qin, M. Egli, H. S. Mchaourab, P. L. Stewart, and C. H. Johnson, Elu- cidating the ticking of an in vitro circadian clockwork, PLoS biology 5, e93 (2007)

2007
[34]

Phong, J

C. Phong, J. S. Markson, C. M. Wilhoite, and M. J. Rust, Robust and tunable circadian rhythms from differentially sensitive catalytic domains, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, 1124 (2013)

2013
[35]

J. Lin, J. Chew, U. Chockanathan, and M. J. Rust, Mix- tures of opposing phosphorylations within hexamers pre- cisely time feedback in the cyanobacterial circadian clock, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, E3937 (2014)

2014
[36]

T. Mori, S. Sugiyama, M. Byrne, C. H. Johnson, T. Uchi- hashi, and T. Ando, Revealing circadian mechanisms of integration and resilience by visualizing clock proteins working in real time, Nature communications9, 1 (2018)

2018
[37]

J. Chew, E. Leypunskiy, J. Lin, A. Murugan, and M. J. Rust, High protein copy number is required to suppress stochasticity in the cyanobacterial circadian clock, Na- ture communications 9, 3004 (2018)

2018
[38]

Y. Liu, G. K. Pattanayak, C. Chi, H. Yoo, A. R. Dinner, and M. J. Rust, An underlying bistability sets amplitude and explains temperature compensation in the cyanobac- terial circadian clock, bioRxiv , 2026 (2026)

2026
[39]

J. S. van Zon, D. K. Lubensky, P. R. Altena, and P. R. ten Wolde, An allosteric model of circadian KaiC phosphory- lation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, 7420 (2007)

2007
[40]

Paijmans, D

J. Paijmans, D. K. Lubensky, and P. R. Ten Wolde, A thermodynamically consistent model of the post- translational Kai circadian clock, PLoS computational biology 13, e1005415 (2017)

2017
[41]

Sasai, Mechanism of autonomous synchronization of the circadian kaiabc rhythm, Scientific Reports 11, 4713 (2021)

M. Sasai, Mechanism of autonomous synchronization of the circadian kaiabc rhythm, Scientific Reports 11, 4713 (2021)

2021
[42]

Sasai, Role of the reaction-structure coupling in tem- perature compensation of the kaiabc circadian rhythm, PLOS Computational Biology 18, e1010494 (2022)

M. Sasai, Role of the reaction-structure coupling in tem- perature compensation of the kaiabc circadian rhythm, PLOS Computational Biology 18, e1010494 (2022)

2022
[43]

Sasai and S

M. Sasai and S. Fujishiro, Molecular clockwork hypoth- esis for the kaiabc circadian oscillations, bioRxiv , 2026 (2026)

2026
[45]

Kageyama, T

H. Kageyama, T. Nishiwaki, M. Nakajima, H. Iwasaki, T. Oyama, and T. Kondo, Cyanobacterial circadian pace- maker: Kai protein complex dynamics in the KaiC phos- phorylation cycle in vitro, Molecular cell 23, 161 (2006)

2006
[46]

Brettschneider, R

C. Brettschneider, R. J. Rose, S. Hertel, I. M. Axmann, A. J. Heck, and M. Kollmann, A sequestration feedback determines dynamics and temperature entrainment of the KaiABC circadian clock, Molecular Systems Biology 6, 389 (2010)

2010
[47]

Gonze, J

D. Gonze, J. Halloy, and P. Gaspard, Biochemical clocks and molecular noise: Theoretical study of robustness fac- tors, The Journal of chemical physics 116, 10997 (2002)

2002
[48]

Gonze, S

D. Gonze, S. Bernard, C. Waltermann, A. Kramer, and H. Herzel, Spontaneous synchronization of coupled circa- dian oscillators, Biophysical journal 89, 120 (2005)

2005
[49]

T. Zhou, J. Zhang, Z. Yuan, and L. Chen, Synchroniza- tion of genetic oscillators, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 18 (2008)

2008
[50]

Pu and P

S. Pu and P. J. Thomas, Fast and accurate Langevin sim- ulations of stochastic Hodgkin-Huxley dynamics, Neural computation 32, 1775 (2020)

2020
[51]

Nishiwaki, Y

T. Nishiwaki, Y. Satomi, Y. Kitayama, K. Terauchi, R. Kiyohara, T. Takao, and T. Kondo, A sequential pro- gram of dual phosphorylation of KaiC as a basis for cir- cadian rhythm in cyanobacteria, The EMBO journal 26, 4029 (2007)

2007
[52]

N. G. Van Kampen and W. P. Reinhardt, Stochastic pro- cesses in physics and chemistry (1983)

1983
[53]

T. L. Hill, Free Energy Transduction And Biochemical Cycle Kinetics (Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1989)

1989
[54]

X. Qin, M. Byrne, T. Mori, P. Zou, D. R. Williams, H. Mchaourab, and C. H. Johnson, Intermolecular as- sociations determine the dynamics of the circadian Ka- iABC oscillator, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 14805 (2010)

2010
[55]

Snijder, J

J. Snijder, J. M. Schuller, A. Wiegard, P. L¨ ossl, N. Schmelling, I. M. Axmann, J. M. Plitzko, F. F¨ orster, and A. J. Heck, Structures of the cyanobacterial circa- dian oscillator frozen in a fully assembled state, Science 355, 1181 (2017)

2017
[56]

A. C. Barato and U. Seifert, Coherence of biochemical os- cillations is bounded by driving force and network topol- ogy, Physical Review E 95, 062409 (2017)

2017
[57]

P´ erez-Cervera, B

A. P´ erez-Cervera, B. Gutkin, P. J. Thomas, and B. Lind- ner, A universal description of stochastic oscillators, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120, e2303222120 (2023)

2023
[58]

P´ erez-Cervera, B

A. P´ erez-Cervera, B. Lindner, and P. J. Thomas, Quan- titative comparison of the mean–return-time phase and the stochastic asymptotic phase for noisy oscillators, Bi- ological Cybernetics 116, 219 (2022)

2022
[59]

Terauchi, Y

K. Terauchi, Y. Kitayama, T. Nishiwaki, K. Miwa, Y. Murayama, T. Oyama, and T. Kondo, ATPase ac- tivity of KaiC determines the basic timing for circa- dian clock of cyanobacteria, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, 16377 (2007)

2007
[60]

Ito-Miwa, Y

K. Ito-Miwa, Y. Furuike, S. Akiyama, and T. Kondo, Tuning the circadian period of cyanobacteria up to 6.6 days by the single amino acid substitutions in kaic, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 20926 (2020)

2020
[61]

Kitayama, H

Y. Kitayama, H. Iwasaki, T. Nishiwaki, and T. Kondo, KaiB functions as an attenuator of KaiC phosphorylation in the cyanobacterial circadian clock system, The EMBO journal 22, 2127 (2003)

2003
[62]

D. T. Gillespie, Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions, The journal of physical chemistry 81, 2340 (1977)

1977
[63]

J. H. Goldwyn and E. Shea-Brown, The what and where of adding channel noise to the hodgkin-huxley equations, PLoS computational biology 7, e1002247 (2011)

2011
[64]

Orio and D

P. Orio and D. Soudry, Simple, fast and accurate imple- mentation of the diffusion approximation algorithm for stochastic ion channels with multiple states, PLoS one 7, e36670 (2012)

2012
[65]

Tseng, N

R. Tseng, N. F. Goularte, A. Chavan, J. Luu, S. E. Co- hen, Y.-G. Chang, J. Heisler, S. Li, A. K. Michael, S. Tri- pathi, et al., Structural basis of the day-night transition in a bacterial circadian clock, Science 355, 1174 (2017)

2017
[66]

Mukaiyama, Y

A. Mukaiyama, Y. Furuike, J. Abe, S.-i. Koda, E. Ya- mashita, T. Kondo, and S. Akiyama, Conformational re- 15 arrangements of the c1 ring in kaic measure the timing of assembly with kaib, Scientific reports 8, 8803 (2018)

2018
[67]

Y. M. Jeong, C. Dias, C. Diekman, H. Brochon, P. Kim, M. Kaur, Y.-S. Kim, H.-I. Jang, and Y.-I. Kim, Magne- sium regulates the circadian oscillator in cyanobacteria, Journal of biological rhythms 34, 380 (2019)

2019
[68]

Hitomi, T

K. Hitomi, T. Oyama, S. Han, A. S. Arvai, and E. D. Getzoff, Tetrameric architecture of the circadian clock protein kaib: a novel interface for intermolecular interac- tions and its impact on the circadian rhythm, Journal of Biological Chemistry 280, 19127 (2005)

2005
[69]

Chang, S

Y.-G. Chang, S. E. Cohen, C. Phong, W. K. Myers, Y.-I. Kim, R. Tseng, J. Lin, L. Zhang, J. S. Boyd, Y. Lee, et al., A protein fold switch joins the circadian oscilla- tor to clock output in cyanobacteria, Science 349, 324 (2015)

2015
[70]

M. Kaur, A. Ng, P. Kim, C. Diekman, and Y.-I. Kim, Cika modulates the effect of kaia on the period of the circadian oscillation in kaic phosphorylation, Journal of biological rhythms 34, 218 (2019)

2019
[71]

Buzsaki, Rhythms of the Brain (Oxford university press, 2006)

G. Buzsaki, Rhythms of the Brain (Oxford university press, 2006)

2006
[72]

S. Danø, P. G. Sørensen, and F. Hynne, Sustained oscil- lations in living cells, Nature 402, 320 (1999)

1999
[73]

P. J. Thomas and B. Lindner, Asymptotic phase for stochastic oscillators, Physical review letters 113, 254101 (2014)

2014
[74]

J. T. Schwabedal and A. Pikovsky, Phase description of stochastic oscillations, Physical review letters 110, 204102 (2013)

2013
[75]

S. H. Strogatz, Nonlinear dynamics and chaos: with ap- plications to physics, biology, chemistry, and engineering (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2024)

2024
[76]

C. E. Dangerfield, D. Kay, and K. Burrage, Modeling ion channel dynamics through reflected stochastic differen- tial equations, Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlin- ear, and Soft Matter Physics 85, 051907 (2012)

2012
[77]

D. Pezo, D. Soudry, and P. Orio, Diffusion approximation-based simulation of stochastic ion chan- nels: which method to use?, Frontiers in computational neuroscience 8, 139 (2014)

2014
[78]

S. E. Derenzo, W.-S. Choong, and W. W. Moses, Fun- damental limits of scintillation detector timing precision, Physics in Medicine & Biology 59, 3261 (2014)

2014
[79]

Milo and R

R. Milo and R. Phillips, Cell biology by the numbers(Gar- land Science, 2015)

2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [44]

Zheng and E

C. Zheng and E. Tang, A topological mechanism for ro- bust and efficient global oscillations in biological net- works, Nature Communications 15, 6453 (2024)

2024

[2] [1]

Gratz, B

D. Gratz, B. Onal, A. Dalic, and T. J. Hund, Synchro- nization of pacemaking in the sinoatrial node: a mathe- matical modeling study, Frontiers in Physics6, 63 (2018)

2018

[3] [2]

Richard, B

P. Richard, B. Teusink, M. B. Hemker, K. Van Dam, and H. V. Westerhoff, Sustained oscillations in free-energy state and hexose phosphates in yeast, Yeast 12, 731 (1996)

1996

[4] [3]

Wolf and R

J. Wolf and R. Heinrich, Effect of cellular interaction on glycolytic oscillations in yeast: a theoretical investiga- tion, Biochemical Journal 345, 321 (2000)

2000

[5] [4]

Richard, B

P. Richard, B. Teusink, H. V. Westerhoff, and K. van Dam, Around the growth phase transition s. cerevisiae’s make-up favours sustained oscillations of intracellular metabolites, FEBS letters 318, 80 (1993)

1993

[6] [5]

Singer, Striving for coherence, Nature 397, 391 (1999)

W. Singer, Striving for coherence, Nature 397, 391 (1999)

1999

[7] [6]

K. M. Stiefel and G. B. Ermentrout, Neurons as oscilla- tors, Journal of neurophysiology 116, 2950 (2016)

2016

[8] [7]

Kuramoto, Self-entrainment of a population of cou- pled non-linear oscillators, in International Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics, edited by H

Y. Kuramoto, Self-entrainment of a population of cou- pled non-linear oscillators, in International Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics, edited by H. Araki (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidel- berg, 1975) pp. 420–422

1975