Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 8 minor 102 references

In de Sitter space, gravitational time advances from shockwave scattering break the thermal (KMS) property of the vacuum and prevent the Hartle–Hawking state from being a trace on the observer's algebra.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 04:28 UTC pith:3YJHKW6U

load-bearing objection A careful 2D model that derives KMS violation and non-tracial Hartle-Hawking state for the dS sign of the eikonal phase, cross-checked in two ways, but the physical reach depends on an unproven null-hyperspace reduction the authors honestly flag. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.13665 v1 pith:3YJHKW6U submitted 2026-07-15 hep-th gr-qc

A de Sitter Anti-Scrambling Algebra

Wentao Cui , David K. Kolchmeyer This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qc PACS 04.62.-v04.70.Dy11.25.Hf
keywords de Sitter spaceobserver algebraKMS conditioncrossed producteikonal approximationout-of-time-ordered correlatorsstatic patch holographyJT gravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies the algebra of observables accessible to a semiclassical observer in de Sitter space when operators are separated by a scrambling time. It shows that gravitational backreaction on the cosmological horizon, captured by an eikonal S-matrix with a negative phase, produces time advances rather than delays. For the dS sign (x<0), the canonical vacuum violates the KMS condition for out-of-time-ordered correlators. Quantizing the observer's clock then implies that the Hartle–Hawking state is not a trace on the resulting crossed-product algebra, and the paper conjectures that the observer's algebra has a trivial commutant. At time separations much larger than the scrambling time, the OTOCs decay and a free product type III1 algebra emerges. These results challenge the observer-centric version of static patch holography.

Core claim

The central claim is that in de Sitter space the eikonal phase for shockwave scattering near the cosmological horizon can be negative, meaning shockwaves experience time advances. In the near-Nariai limit the 2D model reduces to a pair of chiral CFTs with S-matrix S=e^{ixP_A P_B}, x<0. With this sign, the vacuum |Ω⟩ is not KMS with respect to static patch time translations, as shown by the explicit non-perturbative violation Δ_KMS (eq. 3.53). Consequently the Hartle–Hawking state is not a trace on the crossed-product algebra A_cr; the cyclicity violation Δ_Tr is nonzero for x<0 (eq. 3.122). The paper further conjectures that the observer algebra A has trivial commutant (Conjecture 1), suppor

What carries the argument

The central object is the eikonal S-matrix S=e^{ixP_A P_B} acting on two chiral CFTs supported on the future and past cosmological half-horizons. The parameter x encodes the gravitational eikonal phase from shockwave scattering (negative in dS, positive in AdS). The identity (2.70), with the spectral function F_x(λ), together with the exact hypergeometric correlators (3.8)–(3.13), carries the derivation of the KMS violation and the crossed-product construction. The crossed-product algebra A_cr is built from the quantized observer clock and the dressed matter fields; the trace-noncyclicity is computed in the frequency basis via Δ_Tr (eq. 3.122).

Load-bearing premise

The reduction to a 2D chiral CFT model rests on the null hyperspace formalism—the assumption that the observer's matter algebra is generated by fields smeared strictly on the half-horizons, which is verified only for free theories and otherwise imported from the literature.

What would settle it

Compute the half-sided flow commutator (3.41) for an interacting 2D matter CFT (e.g., a marginal φ^4 perturbation) and check whether the KMS-violating contact term survives; if the term vanishes or the commutant becomes non-trivial at any fixed order in the eikonal expansion, the central conclusions would be falsified.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • For a dS observer, the canonical vacuum is not thermal at scrambling-time separations, so standard thermal descriptions of the static patch break down.
  • The Hartle–Hawking state does not provide a well-defined trace on the observer's crossed-product algebra, calling into question the finite-dimensional, tracial picture of observer-centric static patch holography.
  • At time separations far beyond the scrambling time, a type III1 free product algebra emerges and the Hartle–Hawking state again behaves as a trace.
  • The KMS violation supplies a concrete mechanism for 'anti-scrambling' dynamics, showing that gravitational time advance can be correlated with a failure of unitarity bounds that assume KMS.
  • The conjecture of a trivial commutant implies that the observer's algebra is type I, meaning the observer's subsystem effectively contains all degrees of freedom of the static patch.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the trivial-commutant conjecture holds, the algebra of a single dS observer is a full matrix algebra, which may be interpreted as a statement about information-theoretic completeness of the observer's worldline degrees of freedom.
  • A testable extension would be to compute the generalized entropy difference between the Hartle–Hawking state and the tracial state in the free-product limit, quantifying the breakdown of the trace at finite scrambling time.
  • The reliance on the null-hyperspace formalism suggests that the KMS violation might be an artifact of extreme horizon smearing; checking the commutator (3.41) in an interacting 2D matter theory would probe this.
  • If the eikonal approximation is extended beyond the leading phase, subleading corrections could restore a nontrivial commutant, which would set a boundary on how much anti-scrambling survives in a full quantum gravity treatment.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 8 minor

Summary. The paper studies the algebra of observables of a semiclassical observer in de Sitter space when operators are separated by a scrambling time. In the double-scaled limit (2.16), the gravitational backreaction is captured by an eikonal S-matrix S=e^{ixP_AP_B}; for the 4D Schwarzschild–de Sitter near-Nariai reduction the phase parameter is derived to be negative (2.37), and the same sign is obtained in a 3D massive-scalar model (App. C). Working in a 2D chiral CFT model (Sec. 2.2), the paper obtains exact OTOCs in terms of confluent hypergeometric functions (3.8)–(3.9) and shows that for x<0 the vacuum violates the KMS condition — derived twice, via Tomita-Takesaki theory (3.36)–(3.53) and via monodromy of the hypergeometric correlators (3.57)–(3.61) — while for x>0 it satisfies it. Upon quantizing the clock and forming the crossed product, the authors compute the non-cyclicity ΔTr of the Hartle-Hawking state (3.122) and show that no state of the form |Ω⟩⊗ρ^{1/2} yields a trace for x<0 (3.123). They conjecture a trivial commutant (Conjecture 1), supported by Propositions 4–6, and show that for x→−∞ the algebra becomes the free product A_{0,A}∗A_{0,B} (Sec. 4.2), with a geometric interpretation via dS JT gravity shockwave geometries.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper establishes that in the semiclassical observer algebra of de Sitter with scrambling-time separations, the Hartle-Hawking/Bunch-Davies state is not KMS and is not tracial on the crossed-product algebra — a concrete obstruction to the CLPW version of observer-centric static patch holography; it also connects gravitational time advance ('anti-scrambling') to the failure of the MSS assumptions. The strengths are real: exact closed-form OTOCs; the KMS violation computed in two independent ways with precise agreement between (3.53) and (3.61); a 3D free massive-scalar check (App. C) reproducing the same universal exponential phase e^{-iU_{13}V_{24}/x}; explicit test-function control of the delicate x→0 limits (Propositions 1–3); and a Borel-resummation analysis (App. D.1.2) consistent with the exact results. The paper is also unusually candid about its assumptions and open points, and it properly credits [40] for the free-product result. The reservations below concern the scope of the physical claim (2D reduction) and one local technical inconsistency in the frequency-domain smearing arguments.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2.1.2, App. C; Eqs. (3.8)–(3.13), (3.53), (3.122)] The transfer of the 2D results to the 4D dS observer rests on the null-hyperspace equivalence A_0 ≅ A_0(H_+) ≅ A_0(H_−) and on the existence of a UV CFT fixed point for the matter sector. The text states the first is 'valid for free theories', and App. C checks only a free massive scalar in dS_3; general validity is imported from [82]. Every quantitative result — the exact correlators, ΔKMS (3.53), and ΔTr (3.122) — is derived inside the 2D chiral CFT. If either assumption fails for interacting matter, the abstract's unqualified 'we show' statements and the challenge to static-patch holography do not follow from this paper's derivations. Please either supply a general argument or a non-free check of the reduction, or explicitly restrict the scope of the claims to free/CFT matter and revise the abstract accordingly.
  2. [§3.3.2; Eqs. (3.91), (3.126), (3.97), (3.127)] After (3.91) the text says that the residues at λ=in 'all vanish due to the 1/Γ(iλ+ϵ) factor in (3.91)', and analogously for (3.126) with 1/Γ(ik+ϵ). As displayed, both integrands contain Γ(iλ+ϵ)Γ(1−iλ−ϵ) (resp. Γ(ik+ϵ)) in the numerator; those factors have poles at λ=in, not zeros, so taken literally they would invalidate (3.97) and (3.127), i.e., the claim that the smeared detailed-balance violation and ΔTr vanish to all orders in x. The reciprocal structure presumably comes from the 2sinh(πλ) factor in (3.63) via Γ(z)Γ(1−z)=π/sin(πz). Please correct the displayed factors and confirm that the order-by-order traciality argument survives.
minor comments (8)
  1. [§3.2, after Eq. (3.30)] 'discrepency' should be 'discrepancy'.
  2. [App. C, Proposition 7 and vicinity] Typos: 'oberver's algebra' should be 'observer's algebra'; 'near-Nariari limit' should be 'near-Nariai limit'.
  3. [§3.3.2] The phrase 'the trace is no longer cyclic' is awkward despite the clarification in footnote 9; consider 'the trace identity Tr(ab)=Tr(ba) fails'. Also, 'na ¨ ıve' appears as a broken token.
  4. [§3.2.3, Proposition 3] The result that the smeared ΔKMS survives the x→0^- limit only when the smearing functions overlap is important and counterintuitive; it deserves a sentence in the Discussion tying it to the scrambling-time narrative and to the 'perturbative vs non-perturbative' distinction.
  5. [§4.1, Conjecture 1] The conjecture is honestly labeled, but Propositions 5–6 cover only restricted spectral supports, and the remaining cases are admitted to require 'technically challenging' five- and six-point calculations (App. D.2). A sentence in the abstract or §1 distinguishing the conjectural trivial commutant from the proved KMS/non-trace statements would calibrate reader expectations.
  6. [§2.2.3] The traversable-wormhole analogy would be easier to follow if the two-sided coupling e^{igO_LO_R} were explicitly mapped, in one line, to the S-matrix e^{ixP_AP_B} of the model.
  7. [App. D.1.1] The convergence analysis of the analytically continued Fourier integrals is dense; a small table of the convergence intervals in y for G_1 and G_2 for x≷0 would improve readability.
  8. [§4.2] Since the free-product proof is imported from [40], citing the specific lemma/proposition used, rather than summarizing the 'key steps', would make the sign-blindness claim easier to verify.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: x<0 is derived from the near-Nariai eikonal phase (2.37), and the KMS/non-trace claims are computed consequences of the exact correlators, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

Auditing the derivation chain: (i) The dS sign x<0 is not fitted. The eikonal action I is computed in Section 2.1 (eq. 2.23), and the near-Nariai limit yields δ = -4π/ΔS_c e^{2πT/β_c} Λ P_U P_V (eq. 2.37), so the model has S = e^{ixP_AP_B} with x<0 (eq. 2.62). The sign follows from the shockwave calculation, not from the later KMS/non-trace conclusions. (ii) The claimed KMS violation is a computed consequence of the exact OTOCs, not an assumed input: eq. (3.53) gives Δ_KMS = θ(-x)·(...)·e^{-i/x (U13+iϵ)(V24-iϵ)} ≠ 0, and the crossed-product non-trace statement is the explicit difference Δ_Tr (3.122), proportional to θ(-x) times F_x. No parameter is adjusted to make these vanish or not; the x→0^- limit independently reproduces the CLPW tracial behavior (Prop. 1 and Prop. 3), an external consistency check. (iii) The free-product limit (Sec. 4.2) is explicitly the sign-independent proof of Penington-Tabor [40], reproduced rather than obtained by a self-citation chain. (iv) The only non-derived input is the null-hyperspace/CFT reduction: Sec. 2.1.2 states 'We will assume that A_0 is equivalent to both A_0(H_+) and A_0(H_-)' and 'assume that the matter theory has a UV CFT fixed point.' This is an admitted, load-bearing assumption whose general validity is cited to [82], but it is not the same statement as the target result; the KMS violation is computed inside the assumed 2D chiral-CFT model. The trivial-commutant claim is explicitly a conjecture with supporting propositions, not a derived consequence (Conjecture 1). No step in the paper reduces by construction to its own input, so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper's quantitative claims sit on two nontrivial physics assumptions (null-hyperspace formalism, eikonal phase) plus standard QFT/CFT machinery, with the single model parameter x defined by the double-scaled limit rather than fitted. No invented entities: the 'auxiliary antipodal observer' of Secs 4.1–4.3 is a bookkeeping device, not a new particle, force, or dimension.

free parameters (2)
  • x (eikonal S-matrix coupling) = x = −G_N e^{2πT/β_c} in dS; x > 0 for the AdS analogue
    Defined by the double-scaled limit (2.16); the negative sign is derived from linearized gravity (eq. 2.37) but the model is engineered around it, so all quantitative results are conditional on this parameter. It is not fitted to data.
  • operator scaling dimensions h_A, h_B = arbitrary positive integers
    Inputs of the chiral CFT model (Sec 2.2.1). Qualitative results (KMS violation, non-trace) hold for general h, but detailed expressions such as (3.8)–(3.13) depend on them.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Null hyperspace formalism: A_0 ≅ A_0(H+) ≅ A_0(H−)
    Sec 2.1.2; reduction of the 4D observer algebra to algebras smeared strictly on half-horizons. Validated for free theories and a 3D scalar (App C), assumed generally.
  • domain assumption Gravitational interactions reduce to the eikonal phase e^{iI} in the double-scaled limit
    Sec 2.1, eqs. (2.23)–(2.26); the standard shockwave/eikonal approximation in this regime.
  • domain assumption Large-T factorization of early/late QFT correlators (eq. 2.12)
    Sec 2.1; motivates the doubled Hilbert space H_A⊗H_B. IR subtleties for massless fields are acknowledged as ignored.
  • domain assumption Matter theory flows to a 2D chiral CFT fixed point with integer-dimension primaries
    Sec 2.1.2 end; needed for the primary basis, structure constants, and explicit correlator computations.
  • domain assumption Clustering / decay of connected correlators under large modular translations on the horizon
    Sec 4.2, eq. (4.39); imported from [40, 82] to prove the free-product limit.
  • standard math Tomita-Takesaki theory, hypergeometric identities, KMS theory
    App A and throughout; standard background mathematical toolkit.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 74514 in / 15734 out tokens · 690033 ms · 2026-08-02T04:28:38.561655+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the algebra of observables of a semiclassical observer in de Sitter space. When operators are time-evolved by a scrambling time, out-of-time-ordered correlation functions (OTOCs) receive corrections due to shockwave scattering near the cosmological horizon. When the observer's clock is treated classically, we show that the time advance effect implies the breakdown of the KMS condition for vacuum correlators of matter operators. When the observer's clock is quantized, this implies that the Hartle-Hawking state is not a trace on the resulting crossed-product algebra. We conjecture that the observer's algebra has a trivial commutant. When the time separation between operators exceeds the scrambling time, the OTOC decays to zero and a free product algebra emerges. We illustrate this using classical solutions of de Sitter JT gravity with shocks. We comment on how our results pose a challenge for observer-centric static patch holography.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.13665 by David K. Kolchmeyer, Wentao Cui.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: An eternal two-sided AdS black hole. The reason why it is useful to explicitly discuss the wedge algebras AR and AL as well as the abstract algebraic properties (1.1) and (1.2) is that they continue to make sense away from the strict semiclassical limit, such as when the metric is subject to large quantum fluctuations and the geometric notion of a causally complete subregion no longer exists. That is, von … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A Penrose diagram for the Schwarzschild-de-Sitter black hole. To construct the spacetime [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Left: Part of the Penrose diagram for dS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: a Penrose diagram for dS2. Level curves of a vacuum solution to (4.60) are drawn. The physical spacetime ends at the timelike geodesic boundaries where ϕ = 0. Center: the observer emits an early-time shockwave, shown in red with arrows. Given that the dilaton profile below the shock is unchanged, the profile above the shock is determined by (4.65). The ϕ = 0 locus, and hence the physical end of the s… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Each row depicts the geometry that corresponds to the state in the rightmost column. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p065_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The geometry that corresponds to a state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p066_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 80 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Anninos, T

    D. Anninos, T. Hartman and A. Strominger,Higher Spin Realization of the dS/CFT Correspondence,Class. Quant. Grav.34(2017) 015009, [1108.5735]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  2. [2]

    Anninos, F

    D. Anninos, F. Denef, R. Monten and Z. Sun,Higher Spin de Sitter Hilbert Space,JHEP 10(2019) 071, [1711.10037]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    Anninos, C

    D. Anninos, C. Baracco, V. A. Letsios and B. M¨ uhlmann,dS4 Metamorphosis,2602.19812

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    Silverstein and G

    E. Silverstein and G. Torroba,Timelike-bounded dS 4 holography from a solvable sector of the T 2 deformation,JHEP03(2025) 156, [2409.08709]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Banihashemi, G

    B. Banihashemi, G. Batra, Y. T. A. Law, E. Silverstein and G. Torroba,The yes boundaries wavefunctions of the universe,2604.10267

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    McAllister, J

    L. McAllister, J. Moritz, R. Nally and A. Schachner,Candidate de Sitter vacua,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 086015, [2406.13751]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Marini, X.-L

    T. Marini, X.-L. Qi and H. Verlinde,3D near-de Sitter gravity and the soft mode of DSSYK,2604.21014

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    Narovlansky and H

    V. Narovlansky and H. Verlinde,Double-scaled SYK and de Sitter holography,JHEP05 (2025) 032, [2310.16994]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Narovlansky,Towards a microscopic description of de Sitter dynamics,2506.02109

    V. Narovlansky,Towards a microscopic description of de Sitter dynamics,2506.02109

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    Susskind,De Sitter Space, Double-Scaled SYK, and the Separation of Scales in the Semiclassical Limit,JHAP5(2025) 1–30, [2209.09999]

    L. Susskind,De Sitter Space, Double-Scaled SYK, and the Separation of Scales in the Semiclassical Limit,JHAP5(2025) 1–30, [2209.09999]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Susskind,Entanglement and Chaos in De Sitter Space Holography: An SYK Example, JHAP1(2021) 1–22, [2109.14104]

    L. Susskind,Entanglement and Chaos in De Sitter Space Holography: An SYK Example, JHAP1(2021) 1–22, [2109.14104]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Miyashita, Y

    S. Miyashita, Y. Sekino and L. Susskind,Holograms and Standard Models,2607.05678

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    Hoback, D

    S. Hoback, D. L. Jafferis and Z. Wei,Monitoring a de Sitter universe through an anti-de Sitter window,2606.31705

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    Banks,Cosmological breaking of supersymmetry?,Int

    T. Banks,Cosmological breaking of supersymmetry?,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A16(2001) 910–921, [hep-th/0007146]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  15. [15]

    Anninos, S

    D. Anninos, S. A. Hartnoll and D. M. Hofman,Static Patch Solipsism: Conformal Symmetry of the de Sitter Worldline,Class. Quant. Grav.29(2012) 075002, [1109.4942]. 97

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  16. [16]

    Anninos, T

    D. Anninos, T. Anous, I. Bredberg and G. S. Ng,Incompressible Fluids of the de Sitter Horizon and Beyond,JHEP05(2012) 107, [1110.3792]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  17. [17]

    Nakayama,The World-Line Quantum Mechanics Model at Finite Temperature which is Dual to the Static Patch Observer in de Sitter Space,Prog

    R. Nakayama,The World-Line Quantum Mechanics Model at Finite Temperature which is Dual to the Static Patch Observer in de Sitter Space,Prog. Theor. Phys.127(2012) 393–408, [1112.1267]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  18. [18]

    Maldacena,Real observers solving imaginary problems,2412.14014

    J. Maldacena,Real observers solving imaginary problems,2412.14014

    arXiv

  19. [19]

    Y. Chen, D. Stanford, H. Tang and Z. Yang,On the phase of the de Sitter density of states,JHEP05(2026) 068, [2511.01400]

    arXiv 2026

  20. [20]

    Witten,A background-independent algebra in quantum gravity,JHEP03(2024) 077, [2308.03663]

    E. Witten,A background-independent algebra in quantum gravity,JHEP03(2024) 077, [2308.03663]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Tietto and H

    D. Tietto and H. Verlinde,A microscopic model of de Sitter spacetime with an observer, 2502.03869

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    Blommaert, D

    A. Blommaert, D. Tietto and H. Verlinde,An observer’s quantization of 3d de Sitter, 2606.26241

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    K. Goto, A. Milekhin, H. Verlinde and J. Xu,Generalized Free Fields in de Sitter from 1D CFT,2605.03037

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    Chandrasekaran, R

    V. Chandrasekaran, R. Longo, G. Penington and E. Witten,An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,JHEP02(2023) 082, [2206.10780]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Sivaramakrishnan,Correlators of Worldline Proper Length,2406.17205

    A. Sivaramakrishnan,Correlators of Worldline Proper Length,2406.17205

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    Cheung, A

    C. Cheung, A. Sivaramakrishnan, J. Wilson-Gerow and L. Zhou,On Perturbatively Dressed Observables,2605.26077

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    Usatyuk and Y

    M. Usatyuk and Y. Zhao,Closed universes, factorization, and ensemble averaging,JHEP 02(2025) 052, [2403.13047]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    A. I. Abdalla, S. Antonini, L. V. Iliesiu and A. Levine,The gravitational path integral from an observer’s point of view,JHEP05(2025) 059, [2501.02632]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Harlow, M

    D. Harlow, M. Usatyuk and Y. Zhao,Quantum mechanics and observers for gravity in a closed universe,JHEP02(2026) 108, [2501.02359]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    Wei,Observers and Timekeepers: From the Page-Wootters Mechanism to the Gravitational Path Integral,2506.21489

    Z. Wei,Observers and Timekeepers: From the Page-Wootters Mechanism to the Gravitational Path Integral,2506.21489. 98

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    Usatyuk, Z.-Y

    M. Usatyuk, Z.-Y. Wang and Y. Zhao,Closed universes in two dimensional gravity, SciPost Phys.17(2024) 051, [2402.00098]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Akers, G

    C. Akers, G. Bueller, O. DeWolfe, K. Higginbotham, J. Reinking and R. Rodriguez,On observers in holographic maps,JHEP05(2025) 201, [2503.09681]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Engelhardt, E

    N. Engelhardt, E. Gesteau and D. Harlow,Observer complementarity for black holes and holography,2507.06046

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    Zhao,”It from Bit”: The Hartle-Hawking state and quantum mechanics for de Sitter observers,2602.05939

    Y. Zhao,”It from Bit”: The Hartle-Hawking state and quantum mechanics for de Sitter observers,2602.05939

    arXiv

  35. [35]

    Harlow,Observers,α-parameters, and the Hartle-Hawking state,2602.03835

    D. Harlow,Observers,α-parameters, and the Hartle-Hawking state,2602.03835

    arXiv

  36. [36]

    J. M. Maldacena,Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,JHEP04(2003) 021, [hep-th/0106112]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  37. [37]

    S. A. W. Leutheusser and H. Liu,Emergent Times in Holographic Duality,Phys. Rev. D 108(2023) 086020, [2112.12156]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    Leutheusser and H

    S. Leutheusser and H. Liu,Causal connectability between quantum systems and the black hole interior in holographic duality,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 086019, [2110.05497]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    Leutheusser and H

    S. Leutheusser and H. Liu,Subregion-subalgebra duality: Emergence of space and time in holography,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 066021, [2212.13266]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Penington and E

    G. Penington and E. Tabor,The algebraic structure of gravitational scrambling, 2508.21062

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    D. K. Kolchmeyer,von Neumann algebras in JT gravity,JHEP06(2023) 067, [2303.04701]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    Penington and E

    G. Penington and E. Witten,Algebras and States in JT Gravity,2301.07257

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    Boruch, L

    J. Boruch, L. V. Iliesiu, G. Lin and C. Yan,How the Hilbert space of two-sided black holes factorises,JHEP06(2025) 092, [2406.04396]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    D. K. Kolchmeyer and H. Liu,Chaos and the Emergence of the Cosmological Horizon, 2411.08090

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Gao and R

    S. Gao and R. M. Wald,Theorems on gravitational time delay and related issues,Class. Quant. Grav.17(2000) 4999–5008, [gr-qc/0007021]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  46. [46]

    Anninos, D

    D. Anninos, D. A. Galante and D. M. Hofman,De Sitter horizons & holographic liquids, JHEP07(2019) 038, [1811.08153]. 99

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    Aalsma and G

    L. Aalsma and G. Shiu,Chaos and complementarity in de Sitter space,JHEP05(2020) 152, [2002.01326]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    Blommaert, J

    A. Blommaert, J. Kudler-Flam and E. Y. Urbach,Absolute entropy and the observer’s no-boundary state,JHEP11(2025) 113, [2505.14771]

    arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    D. N. Kabat and M. Ortiz,Eikonal quantum gravity and Planckian scattering,Nucl. Phys. B388(1992) 570–592, [hep-th/9203082]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  50. [50]

    Witten,Gravity and the crossed product,JHEP10(2022) 008, [2112.12828]

    E. Witten,Gravity and the crossed product,JHEP10(2022) 008, [2112.12828]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  51. [51]

    P. Gao, D. L. Jafferis and A. C. Wall,Traversable Wormholes via a Double Trace Deformation,JHEP12(2017) 151, [1608.05687]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  52. [52]

    Maldacena, D

    J. Maldacena, D. Stanford and Z. Yang,Diving into traversable wormholes,Fortsch. Phys. 65(2017) 1700034, [1704.05333]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  53. [53]

    Maldacena, S

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford,A bound on chaos,JHEP08(2016) 106, [1503.01409]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  54. [54]

    Verlinde,Double-scaled SYK, chords and de Sitter gravity,JHEP03(2025) 076, [2402.00635]

    H. Verlinde,Double-scaled SYK, chords and de Sitter gravity,JHEP03(2025) 076, [2402.00635]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Verlinde and M

    H. Verlinde and M. Zhang,SYK correlators from 2D Liouville-de Sitter gravity,JHEP05 (2025) 053, [2402.02584]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    A. A. Rahman and L. Susskind,p-Chords, Wee-Chords, and de Sitter Space,2407.12988

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    Chandrasekaran, G

    V. Chandrasekaran, G. Penington and E. Witten,Large N algebras and generalized entropy,JHEP04(2023) 009, [2209.10454]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  58. [58]

    S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford,Multiple Shocks,JHEP12(2014) 046, [1312.3296]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  59. [59]

    Maldacena, G

    J. Maldacena, G. J. Turiaci and Z. Yang,Two dimensional Nearly de Sitter gravity,JHEP 01(2021) 139, [1904.01911]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  60. [60]

    Cotler, K

    J. Cotler, K. Jensen and A. Maloney,Low-dimensional de Sitter quantum gravity,JHEP 06(2020) 048, [1905.03780]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  61. [61]

    Alonso-Monsalve, D

    E. Alonso-Monsalve, D. Harlow and P. Jefferson,Phase space of Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity with positive cosmological constant,JHEP03(2026) 008, [2409.12943]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  62. [62]

    Stanford, Z

    D. Stanford, Z. Yang and S. Yao,Subleading Weingartens,JHEP02(2022) 200, [2107.10252]. 100

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  63. [63]

    Anninos, D

    D. Anninos, D. A. Galante and C. Maneerat,Cosmological observatories,Class. Quant. Grav.41(2024) 165009, [2402.04305]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    Banihashemi and T

    B. Banihashemi and T. Jacobson,Thermodynamic ensembles with cosmological horizons, JHEP07(2022) 042, [2204.05324]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  65. [65]

    Batra, G

    G. Batra, G. B. De Luca, E. Silverstein, G. Torroba and S. Yang,Bulk-local dS 3 holography: the matter withT T+Λ 2,JHEP10(2024) 072, [2403.01040]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  66. [66]

    An and M

    Z. An and M. T. Anderson,The initial boundary value problem and quasi-local Hamiltonians in general relativity,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 154001, [2103.15673]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  67. [67]

    Jensen, J

    K. Jensen, J. Sorce and A. J. Speranza,Generalized entropy for general subregions in quantum gravity,JHEP12(2023) 020, [2306.01837]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    Kudler-Flam, S

    J. Kudler-Flam, S. Leutheusser and G. Satishchandran,Generalized black hole entropy is von Neumann entropy,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 025013, [2309.15897]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    Kudler-Flam, S

    J. Kudler-Flam, S. Leutheusser and G. Satishchandran,Algebraic Observational Cosmology,2406.01669

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  70. [70]

    De Vuyst, S

    J. De Vuyst, S. Eccles, P. A. Hoehn and J. Kirklin,Crossed products and quantum reference frames: on the observer-dependence of gravitational entropy,JHEP07(2025) 063, [2412.15502]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    De Vuyst, S

    J. De Vuyst, S. Eccles, P. A. Hoehn and J. Kirklin,Gravitational entropy is observer-dependent,JHEP07(2025) 146, [2405.00114]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    Chen and J

    B. Chen and J. Xu,An algebra for covariant observers in de Sitter space,2511.00622

    arXiv

  73. [73]

    Strohmaier and E

    A. Strohmaier and E. Witten,The Timelike Tube Theorem in Curved Spacetime,Commun. Math. Phys.405(2024) 153, [2303.16380]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    Kudler-Flam, K

    J. Kudler-Flam, K. Prabhu and G. Satishchandran,Vacua and infrared radiation in de Sitter quantum field theory,2503.19957

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  75. [75]

    C´ ordova and S.-H

    C. C´ ordova and S.-H. Shao,Light-ray Operators and the BMS Algebra,Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 125015, [1810.05706]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  76. [76]

    Dray and G

    T. Dray and G. ’t Hooft,The gravitational shock wave of a massless particle,Nucl. Phys. B253(1985) 173–188

    1985

  77. [77]

    P. C. Aichelburg and R. U. Sexl,On the gravitational field of a massless particle,Gen. Rel. Grav.2(1971) 303–312. 101

    1971

  78. [78]

    Penrose,The geometry of impulsive gravitational waves, inGeneral Relativity: Papers in Honour of J

    R. Penrose,The geometry of impulsive gravitational waves, inGeneral Relativity: Papers in Honour of J. L. Synge(L. O’Raifeartaigh, ed.), pp. 101–115. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1972

    1972

  79. [79]

    ’t Hooft,Graviton dominance in ultra-high-energy scattering,Phys

    G. ’t Hooft,Graviton dominance in ultra-high-energy scattering,Phys. Lett. B198(1987) 61–63

    1987

  80. [80]

    Sfetsos,On gravitational shock waves in curved space-times,Nucl

    K. Sfetsos,On gravitational shock waves in curved space-times,Nucl. Phys. B436(1995) 721–745, [hep-th/9408169]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

Showing first 80 references.