Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 54 references

The static-patch holography conjecture, in its weak trace form, is false: the out-of-time-ordered correlator computed from the Euclidean gravitational path integral with an observer worldline has a leading time-growing correction that incre

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 02:55 UTC pith:GPT2MR6U

load-bearing objection A serious technical challenge to weak static-patch holography, with the falsification claim resting on one unproven factorization assumption in §3.1. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.14042 v1 pith:GPT2MR6U submitted 2026-07-15 hep-th gr-qc

Negative shocks versus static patch holography

Yiming Chen , Douglas Stanford , Haifeng Tang , Zhenbin Yang This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qc
keywords static patch holographyde Sitter spaceout-of-time-ordered correlatorshockwaveobserver recoilchaos boundtrace positivityeikonal approximation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests the static-patch holography conjecture—that correlation functions along a de Sitter observer's worldline, computed from the Euclidean gravitational path integral, equal a trace over a Hilbert space—by computing a four-point out-of-time-ordered correlator (OTOC) in the eikonal approximation. Its central finding is that a weak version of this conjecture fails: the leading time-growing correction to the OTOC has the wrong sign, increasing rather than decreasing the regularized correlator, which is incompatible with positivity of a trace and with the chaos bound. Shock-wave scattering on the de Sitter horizon produces a time advance, not the time delay familiar from black holes, and this sign flips the entire perturbative series. The calculation also reveals two different resummations of the eikonal series, exchanged by the cyclicity property of a trace, so no single cyclic answer reconciles both. A sympathetic reader comes away with a concrete obstruction: if the paper is right, the dictionary between worldline correlators and traces needs modification.

Core claim

Working with a round-sphere Euclidean de Sitter geometry plus an observer worldline, the authors show that the OTOC of two pairs of light fields, computed to leading order in Newton's constant G and inverse observer mass 1/m, behaves as 1 + positive (G e^t + ...) + positive ((G^2 + G/m + 1/m^2) e^{2t} + ...). Because the coefficients are positive rather than alternating, the regularized OTOC grows above its early-time value—the opposite of what would happen for a positive trace with a finite Hilbert space. They then turn this sign into a rigorous contradiction: together with the trace ansatz and analyticity, the growth forces a function |f| to exceed 1 inside a strip while being bounded by 1

What carries the argument

The central object is the gravitational shock-wave solution on the de Sitter horizon sourced by a particle with large null momentum. In pure de Sitter the shock-wave equation has a pure-gauge zero mode at angular momentum ℓ=1; the observer's presence lifts this mode, turning it into a physical recoil effect, so a single shock-wave calculation includes both gravitational backreaction and observer recoil. In three dimensions the shock profile h(ϕ) has a negative average, encoding time advance, and the eikonal OTOC is an integral over shock strengths with a phase exp{i p+ p− h(ϕ)}. The 't Hooft scattering phase and its two contour choices produce the two resummations F12 and F14.

Load-bearing premise

The contradiction assumes that time-ordered correlators on the observer's worldline approximately factorize at the edges of the analyticity strip, with errors small compared to the O(1/m) effects; if those errors grow exponentially in time, the Phragmén-Lindelöf bound does not close and the claimed contradiction with positivity does not follow.

What would settle it

Compute the next-order correction to the factorized time-ordered products in Eqs. (3.8) and (3.10) and check whether it grows like e^t or is comparable to the O(1/m) terms; if it grows exponentially, the upper bound |f|≤1 may fail and the positivity contradiction collapses. Alternatively, find a single cyclic positive function that matches the eikonal series to all orders, which would refute the paper's conclusion.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the central claim is right, the Euclidean path integral with an observer worldline does not compute a cyclic positive trace for four-point OTOCs, so the static-patch holography conjecture must be weakened or replaced.
  • De Sitter shock waves produce time advance rather than time delay, and the OTOC grows; all coefficients in the eikonal series are positive, making the Borel resummation ambiguous.
  • Cyclicity is broken by a choice of integration contour: F12 and F14 are different, and no single contour picks a cyclic answer consistent with both Cauchy-Schwarz bounds.
  • The static-patch dS JT toy model captures the wrong-sign effect: its eikonal action has a negative coupling C, giving the same kind of OTOC growth as the higher-dimensional shock wave.
  • Even the tracial (infinite-temperature) OTOC grows initially, though it remains bounded by the time-ordered correlator.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • (editorial) A plausible way to rescue holography is to abandon the strict trace interpretation and instead treat the worldline observables as generating a non-tracial state or a complex integration contour; the paper leaves this open.
  • (editorial) The same time-advance mechanism should show up in other worldline observables, such as a speedup of causal contact between antipodal points; searching for those effects in lower-dimensional toy models could test whether the sign is universal.
  • (editorial) If the factorization assumption at the edges of the analyticity strip fails exponentially in time, the contradiction would disappear; a direct next-order check of the factorized time-ordered products is the cleanest way to decide.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper tests the 'static patch holography' conjecture, which equates Euclidean gravitational correlators along an observer worldline with traces in a Hilbert space. After reviewing encouraging evidence from the sphere partition function and two-point function, the authors compute four-point OTOCs in an eikonal/shockwave approximation, incorporating both gravitational backreaction and observer recoil. The central technical result is the sign of the first perturbative correction to the regularized OTOC: Eq. (2.42) shows a positive, exponentially growing correction, opposite to the alternating series familiar from black holes. This leads to two different resummations, F12 and F14, which are exchanged by cyclicity. The paper then argues in Section 3.1 that the positive first-order correction conflicts with the combination of analyticity, cyclicity, and positivity required of a finite-dimensional trace, by applying the Phragmén–Lindelöf/chaos-bound argument. It concludes that a weak version of the static patch holography conjecture is false. Appendices provide supporting calculations in a dS JT toy model, higher-dimensional shock waves, and the pure-recoil tetrahedron saddle.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper establishes a concrete obstruction to a natural and actively studied conjecture about de Sitter quantum gravity. The technical work is substantial: the shockwave formalism is extended to include observer recoil via lifted ℓ=1 zero modes, and the dS JT model gives a clean analytic comparison. The explicit perturbative sign in Eq. (2.42) is a parameter-free prediction of the formalism, and the distinction between F12 and F14 provides a useful organizing framework. The main result is falsifiable in the sense that a specific sign of the OTOC growth is computed and then shown to be incompatible with trace positivity. However, the strength of the final contradiction depends on an unproven factorization assumption in the Phragmén–Lindelöf argument, which is load-bearing and not merely a presentation issue.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.1, Eqs. (3.8), (3.10), footnote 20] The edge bounds |f|≤1 are essential for the Phragmén–Lindelöf step, but the final equalities in Eqs. (3.8) and (3.10) replace the exact time-ordered four-point function by a factorized product of two-point functions. The footnote calls this a 'safe assumption' based on OPE dominance of the identity, but no estimate is supplied for the connected part. If the connected time-ordered correlator at the strip edges contains contributions of order G e^s or (e^s/m)^2, the Cauchy–Schwarz bound becomes |f|≤1+O(G e^s), and the conclusion |f|≤1 inside the strip does not follow. Since the entire falsification of the weak static-patch conjecture rests on this bound, the factorization must be proved (or bounded by a quantity smaller than the O(1/m) error budget) before the contradiction is established.
  2. [§2.6, Eqs. (2.78)–(2.80)] The matching between the eikonal OTOCs and the large-ν′ recoil limit is stated as a result but the derivation is explicitly omitted: 'We will not show the calculation here, but in the antipodal configuration... it exactly matches (2.78)'. This identification is then used to locate where F12 and F14 are related by analytic continuation through the small-time region, and it underpins the discussion in §2.5.2 and Fig. 8. The connection is a nontrivial technical claim and should be shown at least in outline; without it, the cyclicity discussion is partly based on an unverified match.
  3. [§2.4.2, after Eq. (2.42)] The statement that 'the entire perturbative series is positive' is used to motivate the Borel-resummation ambiguity, but only the first two orders are displayed. Since the Section 3 argument uses only the first-order sign, this is not a blocking issue, but if the stronger statement is intended literally, a proof or reference is needed.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§2.4.2, Eq. (2.37)] The sentence 'Here, the ± refers to the ≶' is confusing because the equation also has a ± sign in the exponential; please clarify the notation.
  2. [§3.1, Eq. (3.1)] The normalization constant c is described only verbally. Please give its explicit definition or explain how it is fixed by the early-time value of f.
  3. [Throughout] There are minor typographical issues, e.g. 'gravitional' in §2.1 and the axis label 't log|C|' in Figs. 3 and 11, which should be cleaned up.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular derivation; central OTOC computation is self-contained, with at most minor non-load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The central claim is a new shockwave/eikonal computation of the static-patch OTOC. The first correction, Eq. (2.42), is obtained by expanding exp(±i p_+ p_- h(phi)) in Eqs. (2.32)/(2.33) and integrating with the K_{i nu} wavefunctions; no parameter is fitted to the conjectured trace, and no formula is defined in terms of the target result. Section 3.1 is a genuine contradiction argument: assuming the weak conjecture (3.2), the computed positive correction forces |f|>1 inside the strip, while trace cyclicity/positivity plus the Phragmén-Lindelöf argument require |f|<=1. The edge bounds (3.8)/(3.10) rely on the unproved 'time-ordered correlators approximately factorize' assumption flagged in footnote 20. That is a real rigor gap — if connected corrections are not O(1/m) the bound need not close — but it is a correctness risk, not circularity: the factorization is a bulk-QFT property, not a restatement of the trace conjecture, and the contradiction is conditional on it. The self-citations present ([36] for integration contours, [38] work-in-progress, and [41] for the standard JT eikonal formula) are either non-central or parameter-free external results; [41] does not assume or depend on the static-patch conjecture. Accordingly no circular step can be exhibited, and the only ground for a nonzero score is the presence of minor non-load-bearing self-citations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the eikonal/shockwave approximation and on the trace-property assumptions of the conjecture being tested. The only hand-chosen quantity is the Gaussian smearing width δ. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • δ (Gaussian smearing width) = δ ~ 1/√m (order chosen by hand)
    Introduced in Section 3.1 to compare the computed OTOC to a trace with σ = exp(-δ²(m-M)²). The value is chosen so that smearing errors are O(1/m); it is not fitted to data, but the contradiction argument depends on this error estimate.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Eikonal/shockwave approximation reduces the gravitational path integral to an integral over shockwave modes X± with a Gaussian action.
    Used throughout Sections 2.2-2.4; assumes small G and large observer mass, retaining only exponentially growing effects. This is the standard eikonal framework but is a nontrivial approximation to the full gravitational path integral.
  • domain assumption Time-ordered correlators approximately factorize at the edges of the analyticity strip.
    Section 3.1, equations (3.8) and (3.10): 'we assumed that time-ordered correlators approximately factorize.' This is needed for the Cauchy-Schwarz bounds |f|≤1 on the boundary, and is flagged as 'safe' but not proven.
  • standard math Phragmén-Lindelöf maximum modulus principle applies to the function f.
    Used in Section 3.1 to conclude |f|≤1 inside the strip from boundary bounds. This is a standard rigorous mathematical theorem.
  • domain assumption The weak static patch holography conjecture: correlators equal a trace with cyclicity, positivity, and analyticity (finite-dimensional if G>0).
    The paper's target assumption, stated in the Introduction and footnote 2. The contradiction is derived by assuming these trace properties and showing they conflict with the computed OTOC.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 39770 in / 10667 out tokens · 100016 ms · 2026-08-02T02:55:00.869125+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study a version of de Sitter static patch holography in which the Euclidean gravitational path integral, with an observer worldline included, is conjectured to compute a trace. Motivated by recent evidence for this conjecture from the sphere path integral, we test it further by inserting operators along the observer worldline and computing two-point functions and out-of-time-ordered four-point correlators (OTOCs). We extend an earlier OTOC calculation by Kolchmeyer and Liu using the shockwave formalism, incorporating both observer recoil and gravitational backreaction. We find that the OTOC conflicts with two basic properties of a trace in a Hilbert space: cyclicity and positivity. The signaling feature of the shockwave geometry gives rise to two distinct resummations of the perturbative eikonal expansion, which are interchanged by cyclicity. Positivity is violated by the fact that the leading perturbative contribution causes the (regularized) OTOC to increase.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.14042 by Douglas Stanford, Haifeng Tang, Yiming Chen, Zhenbin Yang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Shown is a plot of h(ϕ)/G for the case α = 3π/2. Note that for α < π, h(ϕ) would be negative everywhere. In higher dimensions, the shock wave profile is positive (and divergent) at small impact parameter, although its average value is negative. recoil effect associated to the ℓ = 1 modes or the positive ℓ ≥ 2 modes, but it is a good model of the ℓ = 0 mode of the gravitational shock wave in higher dimensio… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: There are different perspectives on the choice that leads to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of (2.18) (left) and (2.19) (right) for the case [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: In the large mass yet non-backreacting limit, the OTOC can be captured by geodesic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Some example tetrahedron configurations with different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: We sketch the analytic structure of the function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: In the limit m → ∞, the semiclassical action Itetra has a branch cut on the real axis, while being analytic in both half planes. In each quadrant, it matches with a different eikonal OTOCs. The boxed insets attached to the four eikonal OTOCs show their respective analytic structures in the semiclassical approximation. We’ve omitted the branch cuts starting from ±ν in the figure as they are common for all t… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Saddles (dots) and steepest-ascent curves for the semiclassical approximation to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The static patch holography conjecture requires correlation function along the observer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The auxiliary flat tetrahedron, where mij become the lengths of the edges and X⃗ i become the normal vectors to the faces. In the illustration we’ve colored two faces labeled by 1 and 2 and labeled their normal vectors and shared edge. This reduces the problem to elementary Euclidean geometry of finding the dihedral angles given the lengths of the edges of a tetrahedron. We simply state the results here. … view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Here we plot Ftracial(t, 0, t, 0) normalized by the analogous “tracial” time ordered four point function formula by inserting the TOC in the t ′ integral (F.1). An interesting feature of the plot is that Ftracial has initial growth in time, but it is always bounded by the TOC. At early time, the difference between TOC and OTOC comes from the constraint of the mass m ≥ m0, which causes operators fail to co… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: F12(θi |m) is plotted for dS3, with α = 3π/2 and ν = ν ′ = i/2. The peak in the lower left panel is a smoothed out version of the signalling singularity associated to causal contact between the left and right antipodes. For fields of larger mass, this feature becomes more dramatic. References [1] G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Cosmological event horizons, thermodynamics, and particle creation,” Physica… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Cosmological event horizons, thermodynamics, and particle creation,

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Cosmological event horizons, thermodynamics, and particle creation,”Physical Review D15no. 10, (1977) 2738

    1977

  2. [2]

    Addendum to Fast Scramblers,

    L. Susskind, “Addendum to Fast Scramblers,”arXiv:1101.6048 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    Some thoughts on the quantum theory of de sitter space,

    T. Banks, “Some thoughts on the quantum theory of de sitter space,” inThe Davis Meeting on Cosmic Inflation. 5, 2003.arXiv:astro-ph/0305037

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  4. [4]

    De Sitter holography with a finite number of states,

    M. K. Parikh and E. P. Verlinde, “De Sitter holography with a finite number of states,” JHEP01(2005) 054,arXiv:hep-th/0410227

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  5. [5]

    Towards a quantum theory of de Sitter space,

    T. Banks, B. Fiol, and A. Morisse, “Towards a quantum theory of de Sitter space,”JHEP 12(2006) 004,arXiv:hep-th/0609062. 48

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  6. [6]

    Static Patch Solipsism: Conformal Symmetry of the de Sitter Worldline,

    D. Anninos, S. A. Hartnoll, and D. M. Hofman, “Static Patch Solipsism: Conformal Symmetry of the de Sitter Worldline,”Class. Quant. Grav.29(2012) 075002, arXiv:1109.4942 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  7. [7]

    Entanglement and Chaos in De Sitter Space Holography: An SYK Example,

    L. Susskind, “Entanglement and Chaos in De Sitter Space Holography: An SYK Example,”JHAP1no. 1, (2021) 1–22,arXiv:2109.14104 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Double-scaled SYK and de Sitter holography,

    V. Narovlansky and H. Verlinde, “Double-scaled SYK and de Sitter holography,”JHEP 05(2025) 032,arXiv:2310.16994 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    The dS/dS correspondence,

    M. Alishahiha, A. Karch, E. Silverstein, and D. Tong, “The dS/dS correspondence,”AIP Conf. Proc.743no. 1, (2004) 393–409,arXiv:hep-th/0407125

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  10. [10]

    Infrared realization of dS 2 in AdS2,

    D. Anninos and D. M. Hofman, “Infrared realization of dS 2 in AdS2,”Class. Quant. Grav. 35no. 8, (2018) 085003,arXiv:1703.04622 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    De Sitter microstates fromT T+ Λ 2 and the Hawking-Page transition,

    E. Coleman, E. A. Mazenc, V. Shyam, E. Silverstein, R. M. Soni, G. Torroba, and S. Yang, “De Sitter microstates fromT T+ Λ 2 and the Hawking-Page transition,”JHEP 07(2022) 140,arXiv:2110.14670 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    The yes boundaries wavefunctions of the universe,

    B. Banihashemi, G. Batra, Y. T. A. Law, E. Silverstein, and G. Torroba, “The yes boundaries wavefunctions of the universe,”arXiv:2604.10267 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    A microscopic realization of dS 3,

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, and B. M¨ uhlmann, “A microscopic realization of dS 3,”SciPost Phys.18no. 4, (2025) 131,arXiv:2501.01486 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,

    V. Chandrasekaran, R. Longo, G. Penington, and E. Witten, “An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,”JHEP02(2023) 082,arXiv:2206.10780 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    A background-independent algebra in quantum gravity,

    E. Witten, “A background-independent algebra in quantum gravity,”JHEP03(2024) 077,arXiv:2308.03663 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Real observers solving imaginary problems,

    J. Maldacena, “Real observers solving imaginary problems,”arXiv:2412.14014 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  17. [17]

    Path Integrals and the Indefiniteness of the Gravitational Action,

    G. W. Gibbons, S. W. Hawking, and M. J. Perry, “Path Integrals and the Indefiniteness of the Gravitational Action,”Nucl. Phys. B138(1978) 141–150

    1978

  18. [18]

    Chaos and the Emergence of the Cosmological Horizon,

    D. K. Kolchmeyer and H. Liu, “Chaos and the Emergence of the Cosmological Horizon,” arXiv:2411.08090 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    De Sitter horizons & holographic liquids,

    D. Anninos, D. A. Galante, and D. M. Hofman, “De Sitter horizons & holographic liquids,”JHEP07(2019) 038,arXiv:1811.08153 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    Traversable wormholes, shock waves and de Sitter space,

    E. M. H. Verheijden, “Traversable wormholes, shock waves and de Sitter space,” MSc thesis, University of Amsterdam, 2018

    2018

  21. [21]

    Chaos and complementarity in de Sitter space,

    L. Aalsma and G. Shiu, “Chaos and complementarity in de Sitter space,”JHEP05(2020) 152,arXiv:2002.01326 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    Towards a microscopic description of de Sitter dynamics,

    V. Narovlansky, “Towards a microscopic description of de Sitter dynamics,” arXiv:2506.02109 [hep-th]. 49

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Wormholes, Time Machines, and the Weak Energy Condition,

    M. S. Morris, K. S. Thorne, and U. Yurtsever, “Wormholes, Time Machines, and the Weak Energy Condition,”Phys. Rev. Lett.61(1988) 1446–1449

    1988

  24. [24]

    Topological censorship[phys. rev. lett. 71, 1486 (1993)],

    J. L. Friedman, K. Schleich, and D. M. Witt, “Topological censorship[phys. rev. lett. 71, 1486 (1993)],”Physical Review Letters75no. 9, (Aug., 1995) 1872–1872. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1872

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.1872 1993

  25. [25]

    The Null energy condition in dynamic wormholes,

    D. Hochberg and M. Visser, “The Null energy condition in dynamic wormholes,”Phys. Rev. Lett.81(1998) 746–749,arXiv:gr-qc/9802048

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  26. [26]

    Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,

    J. M. Maldacena, “Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,”JHEP04(2003) 021, arXiv:hep-th/0106112

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  27. [27]

    Cool horizons for entangled black holes,

    J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, “Cool horizons for entangled black holes,”Fortsch. Phys. 61(2013) 781–811,arXiv:1306.0533 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  28. [28]

    Tall tales from de Sitter space 1: Renormalization group flows,

    F. Leblond, D. Marolf, and R. C. Myers, “Tall tales from de Sitter space 1: Renormalization group flows,”JHEP06(2002) 052,arXiv:hep-th/0202094

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  29. [29]

    Shocks and information exchange in de Sitter space,

    L. Aalsma, A. Cole, E. Morvan, J. P. van der Schaar, and G. Shiu, “Shocks and information exchange in de Sitter space,”JHEP10(2021) 104,arXiv:2105.12737 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    Timelike boundaries in de Sitter JT gravity and the Gao-Wald theorem,

    G. Batra, “Timelike boundaries in de Sitter JT gravity and the Gao-Wald theorem,” JHEP01(2025) 044,arXiv:2407.08913 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Stringy effects in scrambling,

    S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, “Stringy effects in scrambling,”JHEP05(2015) 132, arXiv:1412.6087 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  32. [32]

    To appear,

    W. Cui and D. Kolchmeyer, “To appear,” 2026

    2026

  33. [33]

    To appear,

    D. Harlow and Y. Zhao, “To appear,” 2026

    2026

  34. [34]

    To appear,

    A. Milekhin, V. Narovlansky, and J. Xu, “To appear,” 2026

    2026

  35. [35]

    The phase of the sum over spheres,

    J. Polchinski, “The phase of the sum over spheres,”Phys. Lett. B219(1989) 251–257

    1989

  36. [36]

    On the phase of the de Sitter density of states,

    Y. Chen, D. Stanford, H. Tang, and Z. Yang, “On the phase of the de Sitter density of states,”JHEP05(2026) 068,arXiv:2511.01400 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    Comments on the de Sitter Double Cone,

    Z. Yang, Y. Zhang, and W. Zheng, “Comments on the de Sitter Double Cone,” arXiv:2505.08647 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  38. [38]

    Work in progress,

    Y. Chen, T. Hartman, D. Stanford, and H. Tang, “Work in progress,” 2026

    2026

  39. [39]

    Shock wave geometry with nonvanishing cosmological constant,

    M. Hotta and M. Tanaka, “Shock wave geometry with nonvanishing cosmological constant,”Class. Quant. Grav.10(1993) 307–314

    1993

  40. [40]

    On gravitational shock waves in curved space-times,

    K. Sfetsos, “On gravitational shock waves in curved space-times,”Nucl. Phys. B436 (1995) 721–745,arXiv:hep-th/9408169. 50

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  41. [41]

    Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space,

    J. Maldacena, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, “Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space,”PTEP2016no. 12, (2016) 12C104, arXiv:1606.01857 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  42. [42]

    Subleading Weingartens,

    D. Stanford, Z. Yang, and S. Yao, “Subleading Weingartens,”JHEP02(2022) 200, arXiv:2107.10252 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    Graviton Dominance in Ultrahigh-Energy Scattering,

    G. ’t Hooft, “Graviton Dominance in Ultrahigh-Energy Scattering,”Phys. Lett. B198 (1987) 61–63

    1987

  44. [44]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity Effects from Planckian Energy Superstring Collisions,

    D. Amati, M. Ciafaloni, and G. Veneziano, “Classical and Quantum Gravity Effects from Planckian Energy Superstring Collisions,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A3(1988) 1615–1661

    1988

  45. [45]

    Scattering at Planckian energies,

    H. L. Verlinde and E. P. Verlinde, “Scattering at Planckian energies,”Nucl. Phys. B371 (1992) 246–268,arXiv:hep-th/9110017

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  46. [46]

    Eikonal quantum gravity and Planckian scattering,

    D. N. Kabat and M. Ortiz, “Eikonal quantum gravity and Planckian scattering,”Nucl. Phys. B388(1992) 570–592,arXiv:hep-th/9203082

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  47. [47]

    The black hole interpretation of string theory,

    G. ’t Hooft, “The black hole interpretation of string theory,”Nucl. Phys. B335(1990) 138–154

    1990

  48. [48]

    Hidden correlations in the hawking radiation and thermal noise

    A. Kitaev, “Hidden correlations in the hawking radiation and thermal noise.” Talk given at the fundamental physics prize symposium, 2014. Nov. 10, 2014

    2014

  49. [49]

    A bound on chaos,

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, “A bound on chaos,”JHEP08(2016) 106, arXiv:1503.01409 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  50. [50]

    KMS, etc,

    L. Birke and J. Froehlich, “KMS, etc,”Rev. Math. Phys.14(2002) 829–872, arXiv:math-ph/0204023

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  51. [51]

    Quasi-local energy and microcanonical entropy in two-dimensional nearly de Sitter gravity,

    A. Svesko, E. Verheijden, E. P. Verlinde, and M. R. Visser, “Quasi-local energy and microcanonical entropy in two-dimensional nearly de Sitter gravity,”JHEP08(2022) 075, arXiv:2203.00700 [hep-th]. [Erratum: JHEP 04, 092 (2025)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  52. [52]

    dS JT Gravity and Double-Scaled SYK,

    A. A. Rahman, “dS JT Gravity and Double-Scaled SYK,”arXiv:2209.09997 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [53]

    De Sitter Space, Double-Scaled SYK, and the Separation of Scales in the Semiclassical Limit,

    L. Susskind, “De Sitter Space, Double-Scaled SYK, and the Separation of Scales in the Semiclassical Limit,”JHAP5no. 1, (2025) 1–30,arXiv:2209.09999 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Random Disks of Constant Curvature: the Lattice Story,

    F. Ferrari, “Random Disks of Constant Curvature: the Lattice Story,”arXiv:2406.06875 [hep-th]. 51

    Pith/arXiv arXiv