Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 98 references

Coupling a quantum observer to JT gravity replaces unitary evolution by an exact average over Euclidean times, with fluctuations a finely spaced observer can resolve.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 02:44 UTC pith:GW6HDKAA

load-bearing objection The exact measure over Euclidean times is new and solid; the variance that drives the quantitative 'observer feels quantum gravity' claim is not verifiable because the Hessian is never displayed. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.14213 v1 pith:GW6HDKAA submitted 2026-07-15 hep-th gr-qc

JT gravity on the worldline

Ben Freivogel , Alessandro Fumagalli , Diego M. Hofman This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qc PACS 04.60.Kz04.60.-m11.25.Tq
keywords JT gravityobserverworldlineproper time fluctuationsdouble trumpetSchwarzian theoryEuclidean quantum mechanicsAdS/CFT
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper asks what a quantum-mechanical observer—a clock or a small laboratory moving on a worldline—experiences when spacetime itself fluctuates. Working in Euclidean Jackiw-Teitelboim (JT) gravity on the disk, it shows that the observer's evolution operator e^{-βH} is replaced by an exact average over Euclidean proper times β_obs, with a closed-form measure μ(β_obs) derived from the coupled worldline, boundary graviton, and einbein path integrals. In the semiclassical limit the measure is peaked at the geodesic distance between the boundary anchor points, so ordinary evolution is recovered, but the fluctuations—computed exactly—contain both a Brownian worldline contribution and a genuine quantum-gravity piece that scales like β/φ_r or 1/m. The paper also computes the double-trumpet analogue, where the measure for the observer's inverse temperature is never sharply peaked, meaning the effective temperature fluctuates strongly.

Core claim

The central discovery is the exact formula (3.12): U_QG = ∫ dβ_obs μ(β_obs,u1,m) e^{-β_obs H}, where the measure μ is obtained by integrating out the fluctuating JT boundary, the massive worldline, and the einbein modulus. The measure is assembled from the AdS heat kernel for the worldline and from Wheeler-de Witt wavefunctions of JT gravity in the chordal-distance basis, and is therefore an ordinary one-dimensional integral. At large mass or small β the integral is dominated by a saddle point at which β_obs equals the geodesic distance between the anchor points; the variance around this saddle separates into a Brownian term ~ β*/m and a quantum-gravity term that scales as β/φ_r (weak backre

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the exact measure μ(β_obs,u1,m) in Eq. (3.12), whose construction is the paper's main technical result. It is built by gauge-fixing the worldline einbein to the proper-time modulus β_obs, integrating the massive particle worldline to a heat kernel on AdS (with proper-length variable y), and expressing the two boundary segments via Wheeler-de Witt wavefunctions φ_u(ℓ) = (2/π²ℓ) ∫ ds s sinh(2πs) e^{-s²u/2} K_{2is}(4/ℓ) in the chordal-distance ℓ basis. Saddle-point evaluation of the resulting five-dimensional integral fixes ℓ*, θ₁*, θ₂* and identifies β_obs* = y* = d(ℓ*), the geodesic length; the quadratic Hessian A_ij then yields the variance formula (3.46), separati

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that in the five-dimensional saddle-point integral the fluctuations of the worldline proper-length y decouple from the fluctuations of β_obs, so that the marginal variance is correctly given by formula (3.46) for the quotient of Hessian blocks; the full Hessian is not displayed.

What would settle it

Compute the full 5×5 Hessian matrix A_ij at the saddle point (including the β_obs–y and y–θ cross-terms) and evaluate the marginal variance exactly; if formula (3.46) is violated or the cross-terms contribute at the same order in m and β, the predicted fluctuation sizes and the detectability windows of §3.3–3.4 change. Alternatively, evaluate the exact measure (3.8) numerically at large m and check whether the variance matches (3.47)–(3.48).

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • An observer's quantum evolution in dynamical gravity is generically a probabilistic mixture of evolutions at different Euclidean times, not a single unitary flow; unitarity is recovered only when the measure localizes.
  • A quantum system with sufficiently small level spacing ω (satisfying ω log(1/ε) ≪ 1) can detect the gravitational fluctuations of its own proper time, even when relative fluctuations δβ_obs/β*_obs are small.
  • The quantum-gravity variance of the observer's temperature, δβ²_QG ~ β/φ_r on the disk, is larger than the effective Planck length squared of JT gravity, echoing horizon-width results.
  • On the double trumpet, where no smooth classical saddle controls the path integral, the observer's inverse temperature fluctuates strongly: relative variance grows logarithmically in the weak-backreaction limit and is order one in the strong-backreaction limit.
  • Late-time Lorentzian overlaps decay as t^{-3} with a universal power, replacing the exponential decay of semiclassical two-point functions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The exact measure μ(β_obs) could be used as a prior for the observer's clock in background-independent constructions: a careful treatment of the observer's quantum state would need to propagate through the time-average rather than a single τ, which may sharpen or modify clock-based dressings of bulk observables.
  • The same worldline-plus-heat-kernel machinery should extend to the double-cone and higher-genus topologies; if the β_obs measure remains non-sharply peaked there, the ensemble interpretation of JT observables would acquire a direct operational meaning for a bulk observer.
  • Because the disk measure is peaked at the geodetic length for any boundary-anchored open worldline, the result suggests a general 'geodesic dressing' principle: any local probe in a nearly-AdS₂ throat experiences proper time as a fluctuating variable whose mean is set by the classical geodesic, and whose variance is set by the combination of worldline mass and renormalized dilaton.
  • A testable extension: couple the observer to a clock degree of freedom with a tunable frequency ω and measure transition rates between neighboring energy levels; the ratios predicted in Eqs. (3.58)–(3.59) should be observable in a quantum simulator of the dual theory, providing a concrete signature of the time-averaging.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a one-dimensional quantum-mechanical observer living on a bulk worldline coupled to Euclidean Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity. On the disk topology the authors derive an exact expression, Eq. (3.8)/(3.12), in which the gravitational dressing turns the ordinary evolution operator into an integral over the worldline proper time β_obs with a measure built from Wheeler-de Witt wavefunctions. In the semiclassical limit the measure is peaked around the geodesic length between the two boundary anchor points, and the paper computes the variance of β_obs, separating a Brownian worldline contribution from a genuine quantum-gravity contribution, and argues that a finely spaced observer can resolve the latter. The paper also gives a Lorentzian continuation, discusses worldline correlation functions and holographic renormalization, and computes the double-trumpet contribution, finding that the effective inverse temperature is not sharply peaked.

Significance. If the central results hold, the paper provides a rare controlled example of a bulk observer coupled to quantum gravity, with an exact integral representation of the dressed propagator and a concrete quantitative criterion for when the observer can perceive gravitational fluctuations. The exact formula (3.12), the use of known WdW wavefunctions, the holographic renormalization discussion, and the analytic double-trumpet calculation are genuine strengths. The main weakness is that the fluctuation analysis—the part that supports the 'observer can feel quantum gravity' conclusion—rests on a variance formula whose derivation is not shown and whose displayed form is not the standard Gaussian marginalization. The central exact formula may well be correct, but the quantitative detectability claims are not verifiable as written.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.4] This equation is the load-bearing ingredient for the variance results (3.47)–(3.48) and for the detectability analysis of §3.3.4. However, the Hessian A_ij is not displayed ('the full expressions are cumbersome, so we will not write them here'), and Eq. (3.46) is not the standard Schur-complement formula for marginal variance. For a real quadratic action with Hessian A, the variance of β_obs after integrating out the other variables is (A^{-1})_{ββ}^{-1} = A_{ββ} - A_{β,rest} A_{rest,rest}^{-1} A_{rest,β}. In particular, if β decouples from ℓ and θ, the variance should be exactly 1/A_{ββ}. Eq. (3.46) contains a standalone +2|A_{ℓθ1}|^2/|A_{θ1θ1}| term that would shrink the variance even in that decoupled case. The appeal to 'steepest descent direction' and absolute values suggests a complex-contour Gaussian, but no derivation is provided. Since the claimed sizes of the quantum-gravity fl
  2. [§3.4] The nonperturbative section asserts, based on 'plotting' the exact measure, that away from the semiclassical limit the quantum-gravity part of the variance is not parametrically suppressed and can grow larger. The text first says 'we will not report the plots here' and then includes figures 4 and 5, but no numerical method, data, or error estimate is given for Var_full and Var_QFT. The definition of Var_QFT is verbal only—'fixing the gravitational variables θ1, θ2, ℓ to their saddle point values'—and no integral formula or quadrature scheme is supplied. These plots are therefore not reproducible, and the nonperturbative conclusions drawn from them are not independently checkable. Please provide either the exact quadrature expressions, the numerical data, or an analytic scaling argument.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.3.4] The detectability estimates (3.58)–(3.59) are introduced with 'up to numerical factors'. Since the criterion is a comparison with the level spacing ω, exact prefactors should be given if the threshold is to be quantitative.
  2. [§3.4] The sentence 'we will not report the plots here' is inconsistent with the presence of figures 4 and 5. Clarify which statements are supported by the displayed figures and which are only described verbally.
  3. [§1] There is a typo in the introduction: 'unitary in Quantum Qravity' should read 'Quantum Gravity'.
  4. [§3.3.3] The demonstration that y-fluctuations decouple from β_obs is given for a two-dimensional toy integral. In the full five-dimensional integral, the same statement is used but the full Hessian is not shown; please make this step explicit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the observer measure is derived from independent WdW/heat-kernel inputs; the sole self-citation [7] is an incidental similarity remark, and the Hessian gap is a verifiability issue, not a reduction.

full rationale

The central chain is self-contained. Eq. (3.12) is not assumed: the measure µ(β_obs) is distilled from the path integral (3.1)-(3.8), which uses gauge-fixed einbein, the AdS heat kernel [75,76], and WdW wavefunctions [77], all external. The saddle point and fluctuation analysis is analytic; no parameter is fitted to the 'predicted' variance. Self-citation [7] in the introduction is a comparison ('similar to the one that one would have when turning on one-dimensional quantum gravity on a worldline [7]') and is never used to derive the measure; [5] is motivational. The double-trumpet measure is obtained by explicit integration over the neck length b (eq. 4.7), not by importing a result from the authors' prior work. The only suspicious element, Eq. (3.46), is indeed unsupported: the Hessian A_ij is never displayed ('the full expressions are cumbersome, so we will not write them here'), and the formula is not the standard Schur-complement marginal variance. However, this is a missing proof / possible calculational error, not a case where the output is equivalent to the input by construction or by self-citation. It does not raise the circularity score. The score of 1 reflects the single incidental self-citation, with no load-bearing circular step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central calculation is an application of known JT technology (Schwarzian action, WdW wavefunctions, heat kernels) to a new observable; no new entities are posited and no numbers are fitted. The main non-standard ingredient is the saddle-point covariance formula (3.46), which is asserted without full derivation.

axioms (6)
  • standard math The JT path integral reduces to the Schwarzian action for the boundary curve (Eq. 2.4).
    Standard result attributed to [73]; used throughout for the boundary mode path integral.
  • standard math Wheeler-DeWitt wavefunctions φ_u(ℓ) in (3.10) give the disk two-point function of JT gravity.
    Taken from [77,78]; used in Eq. (3.8) for the exact measure.
  • standard math The worldline path integral equals the scalar heat kernel in AdS2 (Eq. 3.4).
    From [75,76]; reduces the particle path integral to a single ordinary integral.
  • domain assumption The observer backreaction is negligible (E_n ≪ m, 1/β, 1/u1).
    Stated in §3.3.1; justifies dropping E_n from exponents and allows factorization of the QM evolution.
  • ad hoc to paper The y-fluctuations decouple from β_obs in the quadratic fluctuation matrix, so the marginal variance is (3.46).
    Shown in footnote 12 for a two-dimensional toy integral and asserted to hold generally; the full A_ij are not given.
  • domain assumption Analytic continuation u→ϵ+it maps the Euclidean measure to the Lorentzian integral (3.64) with the same measure structure.
    Assumed in §3.5; not proven but standard for Schwarzian correlators.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 33902 in / 14443 out tokens · 139839 ms · 2026-08-02T02:44:57.693913+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Motivated by the problem of understanding the experience of an observer in dynamical quantum gravity, we study the effects of coupling a one-dimensional quantum mechanical system living on a bulk worldline to Euclidean AdS JT gravity. On the disk topology, where the worldline stretches between two boundary points, we derive exact expressions for the Euclidean propagator of the observer and for its correlation functions, and discuss their holographic interpretation. The main effect on the quantum mechanics is the fluctuation of the total Euclidean time for which the observer evolves, or its inverse temperature for closed Euclidean paths. This turns the standard quantum mechanical evolution operator into an average of those, weighted by a measure over Euclidean times which in the semiclassical limit is peaked around the geodesic distance between the boundary points. We characterize the fluctuations around this value, finding that they are small compared to the mean, but large compared to the effective Planck scale of the model. These fluctuations can be resolved by an observer with a finely spaced density of states. We also discuss the Lorentzian interpretation of these Euclidean calculations. Finally, we compute a contribution to the partition function of the observer coupled to gravity coming from the double trumpet. In this case the fluctuations of the effective temperature are large, reflecting the absence of a smooth semiclassical saddle point.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 85 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    The Trouble with de Sitter space,

    N. Goheer, M. Kleban, and L. Susskind, “The Trouble with de Sitter space,”JHEP07 (2003) 056,arXiv:hep-th/0212209

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  2. [2]

    Some thoughts on the quantum theory of de sitter space,

    T. Banks, “Some thoughts on the quantum theory of de sitter space,” inThe Davis Meeting on Cosmic Inflation. 5, 2003.arXiv:astro-ph/0305037

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  3. [3]

    De Sitter holography with a finite number of states,

    M. K. Parikh and E. P. Verlinde, “De Sitter holography with a finite number of states,” JHEP01(2005) 054,arXiv:hep-th/0410227

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  4. [4]

    Towards a quantum theory of de Sitter space,

    T. Banks, B. Fiol, and A. Morisse, “Towards a quantum theory of de Sitter space,”JHEP12 (2006) 004,arXiv:hep-th/0609062

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  5. [5]

    Static Patch Solipsism: Conformal Symmetry of the de Sitter Worldline,

    D. Anninos, S. A. Hartnoll, and D. M. Hofman, “Static Patch Solipsism: Conformal Symmetry of the de Sitter Worldline,”Class. Quant. Grav.29(2012) 075002, arXiv:1109.4942 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  6. [6]

    De Sitter horizons & holographic liquids,

    D. Anninos, D. A. Galante, and D. M. Hofman, “De Sitter horizons & holographic liquids,” JHEP07(2019) 038,arXiv:1811.08153 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    One-dimensional Quantum Gravity and the Schwarzian theory,

    D. Anninos, D. M. Hofman, and S. Vitouladitis, “One-dimensional Quantum Gravity and the Schwarzian theory,”JHEP03(2022) 121,arXiv:2112.03793 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  8. [9]

    Double-scaled SYK, chords and de Sitter gravity,

    H. Verlinde, “Double-scaled SYK, chords and de Sitter gravity,”JHEP03(2025) 076, arXiv:2402.00635 [hep-th]. – 38 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  9. [10]

    SYK correlators from 2D Liouville-de Sitter gravity,

    H. Verlinde and M. Zhang, “SYK correlators from 2D Liouville-de Sitter gravity,”JHEP05 (2025) 053,arXiv:2402.02584 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  10. [11]

    Double-scaled SYK and de Sitter holography,

    V. Narovlansky and H. Verlinde, “Double-scaled SYK and de Sitter holography,”JHEP05 (2025) 032,arXiv:2310.16994 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  11. [12]

    A microscopic model of de Sitter spacetime with an observer,

    D. Tietto and H. Verlinde, “A microscopic model of de Sitter spacetime with an observer,” arXiv:2502.03869 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [13]

    Generalized Free Fields in de Sitter from 1D CFT,

    K. Goto, A. Milekhin, H. Verlinde, and J. Xu, “Generalized Free Fields in de Sitter from 1D CFT,”arXiv:2605.03037 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [14]

    An observer’s quantization of 3d de Sitter,

    A. Blommaert, D. Tietto, and H. Verlinde, “An observer’s quantization of 3d de Sitter,” arXiv:2606.26241 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [15]

    Gravitational observatories,

    D. Anninos, D. A. Galante, and C. Maneerat, “Gravitational observatories,”JHEP12(2023) 024,arXiv:2310.08648 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  15. [16]

    Cosmological observatories,

    D. Anninos, D. A. Galante, and C. Maneerat, “Cosmological observatories,”Class. Quant. Grav.41no. 16, (2024) 165009,arXiv:2402.04305 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  16. [17]

    Gravitational observatories in AdS4,

    D. Anninos, R. Arias, D. A. Galante, and C. Maneerat, “Gravitational observatories in AdS4,”JHEP07(2025) 234,arXiv:2412.16305 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [18]

    The yes boundaries wavefunctions of the universe,

    B. Banihashemi, G. Batra, A. Y. T. Law, E. Silverstein, and G. Torroba, “The yes boundaries wavefunctions of the universe,”arXiv:2604.10267 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [19]

    Quantum stress-energy at timelike boundaries: Testing a new beyond-ΛCDM parameter with cosmological data,

    O. H. E. Philcox, E. Silverstein, and G. Torroba, “Quantum stress-energy at timelike boundaries: Testing a new beyond-ΛCDM parameter with cosmological data,”Phys. Rev. D 113no. 4, (2026) 043548,arXiv:2507.00115 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  19. [20]

    Timelike-bounded dS4 holography from a solvable sector of the T2 deformation,

    E. Silverstein and G. Torroba, “Timelike-bounded dS4 holography from a solvable sector of the T2 deformation,”JHEP03(2025) 156,arXiv:2409.08709 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  20. [21]

    Bulk-local dS3 holography: the matter withTT+Λ 2,

    G. Batra, G. B. De Luca, E. Silverstein, G. Torroba, and S. Yang, “Bulk-local dS3 holography: the matter withTT+Λ 2,”JHEP10(2024) 072,arXiv:2403.01040 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  21. [22]

    De Sitter microstates from TT+Λ 2 and the Hawking-Page transition,

    E. Coleman, E. A. Mazenc, V. Shyam, E. Silverstein, R. M. Soni, G. Torroba, and S. Yang, “De Sitter microstates from TT+Λ 2 and the Hawking-Page transition,”JHEP07(2022) 140,arXiv:2110.14670 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  22. [23]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252,arXiv:hep-th/9711200

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  23. [24]

    Anti-de Sitter space and holography,

    E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253–291,arXiv:hep-th/9802150

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  24. [25]

    Wave Function of the Universe,

    J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking, “Wave Function of the Universe,”Phys. Rev. D28(1983) 2960–2975

    1983

  25. [26]

    Two dimensional Nearly de Sitter gravity,

    J. Maldacena, G. J. Turiaci, and Z. Yang, “Two dimensional Nearly de Sitter gravity,”JHEP 01(2021) 139,arXiv:1904.01911 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  26. [27]

    Bra-ket wormholes in gravitationally prepared states,

    Y. Chen, V. Gorbenko, and J. Maldacena, “Bra-ket wormholes in gravitationally prepared states,”JHEP02(2021) 009,arXiv:2007.16091 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  27. [28]

    De Sitter Bra-Ket wormholes,

    A. Fumagalli, V. Gorbenko, and J. Kames-King, “De Sitter Bra-Ket wormholes,”JHEP05 (2025) 074,arXiv:2408.08351 [hep-th]. – 39 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  28. [29]

    The no boundary density matrix,

    V. Ivo, Y.-Z. Li, and J. Maldacena, “The no boundary density matrix,”arXiv:2409.14218 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [30]

    Remarks on 2D quantum cosmology,

    D. Anninos, C. Baracco, and B. Mühlmann, “Remarks on 2D quantum cosmology,”JCAP 10(2024) 031,arXiv:2406.15271 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [31]

    Quantum Liouville cosmology,

    D. Anninos, T. Hertog, and J. Karlsson, “Quantum Liouville cosmology,”JCAP06(2026) 065,arXiv:2512.15969 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  31. [32]

    Consistent Evaluation of the No-Boundary Proposal,

    A. I. Abdalla, S. Antonini, R. Bousso, L. V. Iliesiu, A. Levine, and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam, “Consistent Evaluation of the No-Boundary Proposal,”arXiv:2602.02682 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  32. [33]

    Observers,α-parameters, and the Hartle-Hawking state,

    D. Harlow, “Observers,α-parameters, and the Hartle-Hawking state,”arXiv:2602.03835 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  33. [34]

    ”It from Bit

    Y. Zhao, “”It from Bit”: The Hartle-Hawking state and quantum mechanics for de Sitter observers,”arXiv:2602.05939 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  34. [35]

    The Information paradox: A Pedagogical introduction,

    S. D. Mathur, “The Information paradox: A Pedagogical introduction,”Class. Quant. Grav. 26(2009) 224001,arXiv:0909.1038 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  35. [36]

    Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?,

    A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, and J. Sully, “Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?,”JHEP02(2013) 062,arXiv:1207.3123 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  36. [37]

    Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,

    G. Penington, “Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,”JHEP 09(2020) 002,arXiv:1905.08255 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  37. [38]

    The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,

    A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf, and H. Maxfield, “The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,”JHEP12(2019) 063, arXiv:1905.08762 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  38. [39]

    Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini, “Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,”JHEP05(2020) 013, arXiv:1911.12333 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  39. [40]

    Replica wormholes and the black hole interior,

    G. Penington, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, “Replica wormholes and the black hole interior,”JHEP03(2022) 205,arXiv:1911.11977 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  40. [41]

    Clocks and Rods in Jackiw-Teitelboim Quantum Gravity,

    A. Blommaert, T. G. Mertens, and H. Verschelde, “Clocks and Rods in Jackiw-Teitelboim Quantum Gravity,”JHEP09(2019) 060,arXiv:1902.11194 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  41. [42]

    Inside the hologram: reconstructing the bulk observer’s experience,

    D. L. Jafferis and L. Lamprou, “Inside the hologram: reconstructing the bulk observer’s experience,”JHEP03(2022) 084,arXiv:2009.04476 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  42. [43]

    On black hole interior reconstruction, singularities and the emergence of time,

    J. de Boer, D. L. Jafferis, and L. Lamprou, “On black hole interior reconstruction, singularities and the emergence of time,”arXiv:2211.16512 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [44]

    Emergent Times in Holographic Duality,

    S. A. W. Leutheusser and H. Liu, “Emergent Times in Holographic Duality,”Phys. Rev. D 108no. 8, (2023) 086020,arXiv:2112.12156 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  44. [45]

    Causal connectability between quantum systems and the black hole interior in holographic duality,

    S. Leutheusser and H. Liu, “Causal connectability between quantum systems and the black hole interior in holographic duality,”Phys. Rev. D108no. 8, (2023) 086019, arXiv:2110.05497 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  45. [46]

    Fiducial observers and the thermal atmosphere in the black hole quantum throat,

    T. G. Mertens, T. Tappeiner, and B. de S. L. Torres, “Fiducial observers and the thermal atmosphere in the black hole quantum throat,”JHEP04(2026) 145,arXiv:2507.20983 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  46. [47]

    Falling through the horizon of a quantum black hole,

    V. Franken, T. G. Mertens, and B. de S. L. Torres, “Falling through the horizon of a quantum black hole,”arXiv:2607.03344 [hep-th]. – 40 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [48]

    A background-independent algebra in quantum gravity,

    E. Witten, “A background-independent algebra in quantum gravity,”JHEP03(2024) 077, arXiv:2308.03663 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  48. [49]

    An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,

    V. Chandrasekaran, R. Longo, G. Penington, and E. Witten, “An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,”JHEP02(2023) 082,arXiv:2206.10780 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  49. [50]

    An observer’s measure of de Sitter entropy,

    M. Mirbabayi, “An observer’s measure of de Sitter entropy,”JHEP10(2024) 077, arXiv:2311.07724 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  50. [51]

    Chaos and the Emergence of the Cosmological Horizon,

    D. K. Kolchmeyer and H. Liu, “Chaos and the Emergence of the Cosmological Horizon,” arXiv:2411.08090 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [52]

    The gravitational path integral from an observer’s point of view,

    A. I. Abdalla, S. Antonini, L. V. Iliesiu, and A. Levine, “The gravitational path integral from an observer’s point of view,”JHEP05(2025) 059,arXiv:2501.02632 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  52. [53]

    On observers in holographic maps,

    C. Akers, G. Bueller, O. DeWolfe, K. Higginbotham, J. Reinking, and R. Rodriguez, “On observers in holographic maps,”JHEP05(2025) 201,arXiv:2503.09681 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  53. [54]

    An intrinsic cosmological observer,

    A. J. Speranza, “An intrinsic cosmological observer,”Class. Quant. Grav.42no. 21, (2025) 215023,arXiv:2504.07630 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  54. [55]

    Comments on the de Sitter Double Cone,

    Z. Yang, Y. Zhang, and W. Zheng, “Comments on the de Sitter Double Cone,” arXiv:2505.08647 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  55. [56]

    Relativity of the event: examples in JT gravity and linearized GR,

    F. Nitti, F. Piazza, and A. Taskov, “Relativity of the event: examples in JT gravity and linearized GR,”JHEP10(2024) 092,arXiv:2402.01847 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  56. [57]

    Generalized conformal quantum mechanics as an ideal observer in two-dimensional gravity,

    A. Banerjee, T. Kibe, M. Molina, and A. Mukhopadhyay, “Generalized conformal quantum mechanics as an ideal observer in two-dimensional gravity,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 6, (2025) 066011,arXiv:2409.15415 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  57. [58]

    Lower Dimensional Gravity,

    R. Jackiw, “Lower Dimensional Gravity,”Nucl. Phys. B252(1985) 343–356

    1985

  58. [59]

    Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions,

    C. Teitelboim, “Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B126(1983) 41–45

    1983

  59. [60]

    Models of AdS2 backreaction and holography,

    A. Almheiri and J. Polchinski, “Models of AdS2 backreaction and holography,”JHEP11 (2015) 014,arXiv:1402.6334 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  60. [61]

    An investigation of AdS2 backreaction and holography,

    J. Engelsöy, T. G. Mertens, and H. Verlinde, “An investigation of AdS2 backreaction and holography,”JHEP07(2016) 139,arXiv:1606.03438 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  61. [62]

    Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,

    J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, “Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,”Phys. Rev. D94 no. 10, (2016) 106002,arXiv:1604.07818 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  62. [63]

    A semiclassical ramp in SYK and in gravity,

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, “A semiclassical ramp in SYK and in gravity,” arXiv:1806.06840 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  63. [64]

    JT gravity as a matrix integral,

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, “JT gravity as a matrix integral,” arXiv:1903.11115 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1903

  64. [65]

    Late Time Correlation Functions, Baby Universes, and ETH in JT Gravity,

    P. Saad, “Late Time Correlation Functions, Baby Universes, and ETH in JT Gravity,” arXiv:1910.10311 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1910

  65. [66]

    The entropy of Hawking radiation,

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini, “The entropy of Hawking radiation,”Rev. Mod. Phys.93no. 3, (2021) 035002,arXiv:2006.06872 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  66. [67]

    On the quantum width of a black hole horizon,

    D. Marolf, “On the quantum width of a black hole horizon,”Springer Proc. Phys.98(2005) 99–112,arXiv:hep-th/0312059. – 41 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  67. [68]

    Spacetime Fluctuations in AdS/CFT,

    E. Verlinde and K. M. Zurek, “Spacetime Fluctuations in AdS/CFT,”JHEP04(2020) 209, arXiv:1911.02018 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  68. [69]

    Observational signatures of quantum gravity in interferometers,

    E. P. Verlinde and K. M. Zurek, “Observational signatures of quantum gravity in interferometers,”Phys. Lett. B822(2021) 136663,arXiv:1902.08207 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  69. [70]

    Modular fluctuations from shockwave geometries,

    E. Verlinde and K. M. Zurek, “Modular fluctuations from shockwave geometries,”Phys. Rev. D106no. 10, (2022) 106011,arXiv:2208.01059 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  70. [71]

    Quantum Fluctuations of the Black Hole Horizon,

    B. Freivogel, A. Speranza, and E. Verlinde, “Quantum Fluctuations of the Black Hole Horizon,”arXiv:2606.28243 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  71. [72]

    Large Quantum Gravity Fluctuations of BTZ Black Holes,

    B. Freivogel and U. Moitra, “Large Quantum Gravity Fluctuations of BTZ Black Holes,” arXiv:2606.28160 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  72. [73]

    Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space,

    J. Maldacena, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, “Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space,”PTEP2016no. 12, (2016) 12C104, arXiv:1606.01857 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  73. [74]

    Classifying boundary conditions in JT gravity: from energy-branes toα-branes,

    A. Goel, L. V. Iliesiu, J. Kruthoff, and Z. Yang, “Classifying boundary conditions in JT gravity: from energy-branes toα-branes,”JHEP04(2021) 069,arXiv:2010.12592 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  74. [75]

    Harmonic analysis and propagators on homogeneous spaces,

    R. Camporesi, “Harmonic analysis and propagators on homogeneous spaces,”Phys. Rept. 196(1990) 1–134

    1990

  75. [76]

    Heat kernels on cone ofAdS2 andk-wound circular Wilson loop inAdS 5 ×S 5 superstring,

    R. Bergamin and A. A. Tseytlin, “Heat kernels on cone ofAdS2 andk-wound circular Wilson loop inAdS 5 ×S 5 superstring,”J. Phys. A49no. 14, (2016) 14LT01,arXiv:1510.06894 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  76. [77]

    The Quantum Gravity Dynamics of Near Extremal Black Holes,

    Z. Yang, “The Quantum Gravity Dynamics of Near Extremal Black Holes,”JHEP05(2019) 205,arXiv:1809.08647 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  77. [78]

    Solving the Schwarzian via the Conformal Bootstrap,

    T. G. Mertens, G. J. Turiaci, and H. L. Verlinde, “Solving the Schwarzian via the Conformal Bootstrap,”JHEP08(2017) 136,arXiv:1705.08408 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  78. [79]

    JT gravity at finite cutoff,

    L. V. Iliesiu, J. Kruthoff, G. J. Turiaci, and H. Verlinde, “JT gravity at finite cutoff,”SciPost Phys.9(2020) 023,arXiv:2004.07242 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  79. [80]

    Finite-cutoff JT gravity and self-avoiding loops,

    D. Stanford and Z. Yang, “Finite-cutoff JT gravity and self-avoiding loops,” arXiv:2004.08005 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  80. [81]

    Nonperturbative effects and resurgence in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity at finite cutoff,

    L. Griguolo, R. Panerai, J. Papalini, and D. Seminara, “Nonperturbative effects and resurgence in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity at finite cutoff,”Phys. Rev. D105no. 4, (2022) 046015,arXiv:2106.01375 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

Showing first 80 references.