Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

The paper claims that the two-dimensional Ising model deformed by its thermal operator and placed on de Sitter space is exactly solvable, and that exact late-time correlators resum the secular logarithms that wreck conformal perturbation th

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 02:43 UTC pith:KM77X6EM

load-bearing objection The exact dS Ising results are solid and worth refereeing; the spin/disorder exponent claim is a plausible but under-supported add-on that needs a closer look. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.14219 v1 pith:KM77X6EM submitted 2026-07-15 hep-th

Ising the way into de Sitter

Giovanni Galati , Stathis Vitouladitis This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords Ising modelde Sitter spacetimethermal deformationfermionisationcosmological correlatorsconformal perturbation theorysecular logarithmslate-time scaling dimensions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that the two-dimensional Ising model deformed by its thermal operator and placed on de Sitter space is exactly solvable, thanks to its equivalence to a free massive Majorana fermion. The authors compute the renormalised sphere partition function and exact two-point functions of the thermal, spin, and disorder operators, then continue them to Lorentzian de Sitter. Their main result for the thermal correlator is that at late times it decays with a fixed scaling dimension, while the subleading contribution resums all perturbative secular logarithms into oscillations governed by the mass-radius parameter ν. For the spin and disorder operators they derive a non-perturbative constraint on the late-time scaling dimensions, with a perturbative expansion that matches their numerics. If this is right, the Ising model provides the simplest solvable laboratory for how pathologies of de Sitter perturbation theory are cured by exact results.

Core claim

The central discovery, on the paper's own terms, is that the thermal deformation of the Ising CFT on the sphere admits an exact fermionic description as a free massive Majorana fermion, and this makes a set of de Sitter observables exactly computable. The late-time two-point function of the energy operator behaves as (1/4ℓ^2)(2πν/sinh(2πν))(uL/2)^{-1}, with a ν-independent exponent equal to the CFT dimension; the first subleading term oscillates as cos(2ν log X). The spin and disorder two-point functions, although non-local in the fermion field, are shown to satisfy a non-perturbative constraint, Δ̃σ + Δ̃μ − (Δ̃σ − Δ̃μ)² = ν² + 1/4, with perturbative expansions Δ̃σ = 1/8 + ν/2 + ν² + O(ν³) a

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the fermionisation map taking the strongly interacting Ising CFT deformed by ε to a free massive Majorana fermion on the Euclidean sphere. Because the sphere's Dirac spectrum is known exactly, Gaussian integration gives the renormalised partition function and the exact energy two-point function in closed hypergeometric form. For the non-local spin and disorder operators the argument switches to a system of second-order differential equations, quoted from the literature, which together with the exact antipodal ratio Gμ(2)/Gσ(2)=e^{πν} and the pure-power late-time ansatz yields the non-perturbative constraint on scaling dimensions. The late-time behaviour is organise

Load-bearing premise

The spin and disorder late-time exponents are extracted by assuming their two-point functions decay as pure power laws with no logarithmic or oscillatory corrections; if that leading form is not exact, the non-perturbative constraint on Δ̃σ and Δ̃μ does not follow.

What would settle it

Compute the spin two-point function at very large Lorentzian separations by solving the ODE system with high precision and fit the exponent over different fitting windows; if the extracted Δ̃σ shifts with the window, the pure power-law ansatz fails. Separately, the oscillatory subleading term in the thermal correlator, with frequency 2ν and phase arctan(2ν), can be checked numerically: if it is absent, the principal-series resummation claim is wrong.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The thermal two-point function's leading late-time exponent is ν-independent; the entire ν-dependence sits in the normalization (1/4ℓ²)(2πν/sinh 2πν).
  • The subleading late-time correlator of the descendant operator εT with ε oscillates as cos(2ν log X), turning naive log²X secular growth into a finite oscillatory signal.
  • The spin and disorder late-time dimensions obey Δ̃σ+Δ̃μ−(Δ̃σ−Δ̃μ)² = ν²+1/4 for all ν; at small ν the difference grows linearly and the sum grows quadratically.
  • Conformal perturbation theory is generically unreliable at late times: it produces secular logarithms that the exact resummed result removes, so the ν→0 and late-time limits do not commute.
  • The two-loop matching of the sphere partition function, with a ζ(3) coefficient from the Bloch–Wigner dilogarithm integral, confirms the Ising/Majorana duality on the sphere and fixes τ=m/2π.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mechanism — resummation of late-time secular logarithms into principal-series oscillations — is likely to appear in any massive or interacting QFT in dS2 whose two-point functions have a spectral representation; one testable extension is to compare the cos(2ν log X) prediction with O(N) vector models at large N.
  • The exact antipodal ratio e^{πν} for spin vs disorder may extend to other Ramond-sector insertions, suggesting a simple exponential law for overlap of order/disorder states in the cylinder description; measuring it on spherical-lattice simulations at finite ν would be a direct check.
  • The paper notes that an imaginary thermal deformation would access discrete-series fermions and connects to Fisher zeros on spherical lattices; a concrete follow-up is computing the renormalised partition function at imaginary ν and locating its zeros.
  • The relation (6.8) looks like a dS2 bootstrap-style constraint; if the ODE system can be derived from symmetry principles alone, the exponent relations would follow without the free-fermion input, possibly generalising beyond Ising.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper analyzes the two-dimensional Ising CFT deformed by the thermal operator on de Sitter space, exploiting fermionization to map the theory to a free massive Majorana fermion. The authors compute the renormalized sphere partition function, the exact two-point function of the energy operator and of descendant-like operators, and their analytic continuation to Lorentzian dS2. They compare the exact results with conformal perturbation theory, showing that secular late-time logarithms appear in perturbation theory and are resummed into oscillatory behavior in the exact correlators. For the spin and disorder operators, which are non-local in the fermionic variables, the paper imports a differential-equation system from the literature to derive a nonperturbative constraint on their late-time scaling dimensions and compares with one-loop CPT. The abstract and introduction frame the model as a solvable laboratory for late-time de Sitter dynamics and for understanding the breakdown of perturbation theory.

Significance. If the spin/disorder claims are fully established, the paper would be a valuable addition to the short list of exactly solvable interacting QFTs in de Sitter space. The exact Majorana-frame computations are presented in detail and are internally consistent: the two-loop matching of the sphere partition function, including the ζ(3) coefficient, is a strong check of the duality map τ=m/(2π). The exact energy two-point function is explicit and the demonstration that secular logs are resummed into principal-series oscillations is a concrete and instructive example of the failure of CPT at late times. The paper does not provide code, but the analytic derivations are largely self-contained and reproducible from the formulas given.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 6, Eq. (6.7)] The pure power-law ansatz Gσ~A u^{-Δ̃σ}, Gμ~B u^{-Δ̃μ} is inserted into (6.3)-(6.5), but only the leading u^{-Δ̃σ-Δ̃μ} terms are matched to obtain (6.8). Subleading terms of order u^{-Δ̃σ-Δ̃μ-1} in (6.5) are not cancelled by the ansatz. Thus (6.8) is only a leading-order asymptotic condition, not a proven nonperturbative constraint on the scaling dimensions. If the true solution has logarithmic or oscillatory corrections (cf. the ν log u term in (6.16)), the exponents extracted from a pure power fit may be biased. The authors should provide an asymptotic analysis of the ODE system or state the result more modestly.
  2. [Section 6, Eqs. (6.3)-(6.5)] The ODE system is imported from [54] and derived on the Euclidean sphere, where u∈[0,2]. The paper integrates these equations to u>2 and uses the large-u behavior to define Δ̃σ and Δ̃μ. This assumes that the Lorentzian analytic continuation of the correlators satisfies the same differential equations. No justification for this continuation of the Ward identities is given. The authors should either prove the continuation or support it with an independent late-time calculation.
  3. [Section 6, Figs. 3-5] The numerical extraction of Δ̃σ and Δ̃μ is not reproducible: no code, no error bars, no stated u-range for the fits, and no comparison with a log-amended fit. Given the explicit ν log u at O(ν) in (6.16), log corrections at O(ν^2) are plausible and could shift the fitted exponents. Without these details, the comparison with (6.18) in Fig. 5 is not convincing. This is load-bearing for the individual exponent predictions, though less for (6.8) itself.
  4. [Section 5.1, Eq. (5.28)] The descendant operator is defined as ε_T = (1 - T∂_T)ε. From (5.21), at late times T∂_T = -2 X∂_X, so 1 - T∂_T = 1 + 2X∂_X. This does not remove the leading X^{-1} tail; the operator that implements D_X = 1 + X∂_X is 1 - (1/2)T∂_T. Consequently Eqs. (5.29) and (5.50) are not the correlators of the operator defined in (5.28). Please correct the definition or the formulas.
minor comments (4)
  1. [General] Numerous rendering typos 'η/∫hortrightarrow0' appear in §§1,2,5,6 and should read 'η→0'; similar arrow symbols are corrupted in a few other places.
  2. [Figs. 3, 4] Axis labels are missing; please add them and specify the fitting interval and the fitting function used to extract the late-time exponents.
  3. [Eq. (6.16)] The large-u expansion of the elliptic integral K(1-u/2) is used to derive (6.16); it would be helpful to state the expansion explicitly or cite a reference.
  4. [References] Reference [33] is dated 2026 and appears to be a preprint; please verify the bibliographic details.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the exact energy sector is self-contained, and the spin/disorder constraints follow from an external ODE system plus an explicit ansatz, not from the results being derived.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The exact partition function and energy two-point function are computed in the free Majorana frame by Pfaffian integration and Wick contractions (eqs. (4.13), (5.7)); the map tau=m/(2 pi) is fixed by matching the O(nu^2) partition function and then independently checked at O(nu^4) and in the O(nu^2) epsilon-epsilon correlator. The late-time epsilon-epsilon behavior (5.25) and descendant oscillations (5.29) follow from standard hypergeometric asymptotics of the exact result, not from the CPT input. The spin/disorder section imports the Doyon–Fonseca ODE system (6.3)–(6.5) from an external paper [54], states the pure power-law ansatz (6.7) explicitly, substitutes it to obtain the constraint (6.8), and determines the exponents from the O(nu) ODE solution together with the independently derived antipodal ratio (6.9). This is a legitimate use of an external theorem and an explicit asymptotic ansatz; the constraint is a consequence of the ODE, not an input. The only self-citations ([30], [114]) appear in the outlook and are not load-bearing. Concerns about the validity of the pure-power ansatz or the accuracy of numerical exponent extraction are correctness/rigor issues, not circularity: no equation is used to predict itself, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

The paper adds essentially no new free parameters beyond the physical ν and the scheme constant α. It relies on the standard Ising/Majorana fermionization, on externally derived ODEs for spin correlators, and on the spectral data of the Dirac operator on spheres. The ε-side is self-contained; the spin side depends on an external differential-equation input that is not rederived.

free parameters (2)
  • ν = mℓ = 2πτℓ = varied; report includes ν = 1/5 and range up to 0.14 in numerical extraction
    The only dimensionless coupling. It is a physical input parameter, not a fitted constant, but the late-time exponents are extracted numerically as a function of ν. The perturbative expansion in ν is the small-parameter expansion.
  • α = finite scheme-dependent constant
    Coefficient of the ν^2 counterterm in the renormalized sphere partition function (4.12). It is a free renormalization-scheme parameter, not measurable; cancels in correlation functions.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Fermionization: thermal Ising CFT + τ∫ε = free massive Majorana fermion; on S^2 the Z2 gauging is trivial and maps partition functions and correlators of ε to the Majorana frame.
    Section 3 states the duality and argues S^2 has no non-contractible cycles, so gauging is trivial. This is a standard, well-established result, but the paper does not derive it; the matching at order ν^2 and ν^4 (section 4) provides non-trivial evidence for the normalization τ = m/2π.
  • domain assumption Doyon–Fonseca differential equations (6.3)–(6.5) for the spin/disorder two-point functions on the sphere, derived in [54] via special Ward identities.
    Section 6 imports these equations without derivation. The paper uses them as the central tool for the non-perturbative constraint (6.8). The physical boundary conditions (CFT short-distance, smoothness at antipodal points, antipodal ratio (6.9)) select the physical solution.
  • standard math Analytic continuation from Euclidean sphere to Lorentzian dS2 via u → u_L gives Bunch–Davies correlators; the late-time limit is X → ∞.
    Standard Wick rotation and dS representation theory (section 2, references [67] and earlier).
  • standard math Dirac spectrum on S^2: eigenvalues ± i n/ℓ with degeneracy 2n per sign (Camporesi–Higuchi).
    Appendix A gives the full spectral analysis and references [69]. Used to evaluate the Pfaffian and propagator.
invented entities (1)
  • ε_T descendant-like operator independent evidence
    purpose: A derivative combination (1 - T∂_T)ε(x) that isolates the oscillatory subleading late-time behavior in the εε correlator.
    It is a local composite of the fermion field, hence well-defined, and provides a falsifiable prediction (5.29) that is verified analytically against the exact correlator.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 35568 in / 8647 out tokens · 70659 ms · 2026-08-02T02:43:16.071354+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the two-dimensional Ising model deformed by the relevant thermal operator and placed on de Sitter (dS) spacetime. Despite being strongly interacting in its original formulation, the theory is exactly solvable on account of fermionisation. We compute exact cosmological correlators and compare them with conformal perturbation theory. In the Euclidean formulation of the model, we first compute the renormalised sphere partition function and the exact two-point functions of the thermal operator and descendant-like operators. We analytically continue the two-point functions to Lorentzian dS$_2$. Their late-time behaviour is governed by de Sitter representation theory and includes oscillations associated with principal-series scaling dimensions. We then analyse two-point functions of the spin and disorder operators, which are non-local in the fermionic variables, and derive non-perturbative constraints on their late-time scaling dimensions. In both cases, we compare the exact answers to conformal perturbation theory (CPT) and we show that divergent secular terms generically spoil the perturbative series at late times. The de Sitter Ising model shows explicitly how late-time perturbative pathologies are resummed in non-perturbative cosmological observables and provides a minimal solvable laboratory for quantum field theory dynamics in de Sitter space.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.14219 by Giovanni Galati, Stathis Vitouladitis.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Penrose diagram of global dS2. Time runs upwards, from the past conformal boundary, I −, to the future one, I +. The vertical sides are the worldlines of the north and south poles of the spatial circle. The shaded triangle is the expanding planar patch covered by (η, x); its future boundary reaches I + at η ! 0. The red diagonal is the null horizon of the patch. theory contains fermions. See [57–59] for th… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Exact (solid red line) and O ν 2  perturbative (dashed black line) plots of (u L xy) 2 ⟨εT (x)ε(y)⟩ at ν = 1/5. The perturbative correlator displays secular growth. The exact correlator resums all the secular terms into a finite, oscillating expression. flat space, no closed-form analytic expressions for these correlators are known, although they are exactly characterised by the celebrated Painlev´e III e… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Numerical spin and disorder two-point functions, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Late-time exponents extracted from the numerical solutions. Top: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Numerical late-time exponents (solid) compared with the O [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A discrete series gauge field at the late-time boundary of $dS_4$

    hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    Both Δ=1 and Δ=2 late-time Maxwell operators on planar dS4 furnish the photon unitary discrete series of SO(4,1), which splits into opposite-helicity summands via self-dual field-strength sectors.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

120 extracted references · 67 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A. A. Starobinsky.A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singu- larity, Phys. Lett. B 91 (1980), 99–102

    1980

  2. [2]

    A. H. Guth.The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981), 347–356

    1981

  3. [3]

    A. D. Linde.A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems, Phys. Lett. B 108 (1982), 389–393

    1982

  4. [4]

    AlbrechtandP

    A. AlbrechtandP. J. Steinhardt.Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982), 1220–1223

    1982

  5. [5]

    Planck Collaboration.Planck 2018 Results. VI. Cosmological Parameters, Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 (2020), A6

    2018

  6. [6]

    Suzuki,D

    N. Suzuki,D. Rubin,C. Lidman,G. Aldering,R. Amanullah,K. Barbary, et al.The Hubble Space Telescope Cluster Supernova Survey. V. Improving the Dark- Energy Constraints Above z > 1and Building an Early-Type-Hosted Supernova Sample, The Astrophysical Journal 746 (2012), 85

    2012

  7. [7]

    https://www

    Sloan Digital Sky Survey.Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). https://www. sdss.org. (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    Anninos.De Sitter Musings, Int

    D. Anninos.De Sitter Musings, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 27 (2012), 1230013. arXiv: 1205.3855 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  9. [9]

    Witten.Quantum gravity in de Sitter space.Strings 2001: International Con- ference

    E. Witten.Quantum gravity in de Sitter space.Strings 2001: International Con- ference. (2001). arXiv:hep-th/0106109

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  10. [10]

    Nachtmann.Quantum theory in de-Sitter space, Commun

    O. Nachtmann.Quantum theory in de-Sitter space, Commun. Math. Phys. 6.1 (1967), 1–16

    1967

  11. [11]

    N. A. ChernikovandE. A. Tagirov.Quantum theory of scalar field in de Sitter space-time, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. A 9.2 (1968), 109–141

    1968

  12. [12]

    SchomblondandP

    C. SchomblondandP. Spindel.Conditions d’unicit´ e pour le propagateur∆ 1(x,y ) du champ scalaire dans l’univers de de Sitter, fr. Annales de l’institut Henri Poincar´ e. Section A, Physique Th´ eorique 25.1 (1976), 67–78

    1976

  13. [13]

    T. S. BunchandP. C. W. Davies.Quantum Field Theory in de Sitter Space: Renormalization by Point Splitting, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 360 (1978), 117–134. [14]E. Mottola.Particle Creation in de Sitter Space, Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985), 754. [15]B. Allen.Vacuum States in de Sitter Space, Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985), 3136

    1978

  14. [16]

    Higuchi.Symmetric Tensor Spherical Harmonics on the N Sphere and Their Application to the De Sitter Group SO( N,1), J

    A. Higuchi.Symmetric Tensor Spherical Harmonics on the N Sphere and Their Application to the De Sitter Group SO( N,1), J. Math. Phys. 28 (1987). [Erratum: J. Math. Phys. 43, 6385 (2002)], 1553

    1987

  15. [17]

    Higuchi.Linearized Gravity in de Sitter Space-Time as a Representation of SO(4,1), Class

    A. Higuchi.Linearized Gravity in de Sitter Space-Time as a Representation of SO(4,1), Class. Quant. Grav. 8 (1991), 2005–2021

    1991

  16. [18]

    Higuchi.Quantum Linearization Instabilities of de Sitter Space-Time

    A. Higuchi.Quantum Linearization Instabilities of de Sitter Space-Time. 1, Class. Quant. Grav. 8 (1991), 1961–1981

    1991

  17. [19]

    Higuchi.Quantum Linearization Instabilities of de Sitter Space-Time

    A. Higuchi.Quantum Linearization Instabilities of de Sitter Space-Time. 2, Class. Quant. Grav. 8 (1991), 1983–2004

    1991

  18. [20]

    Anninos,T

    D. Anninos,T. Anous,D. Z. Freedman, andG. Konstantinidis.Late-time Structure of the Bunch-Davies De Sitter Wavefunction, JCAP 11 (2015), 048. arXiv: 1406.5490 [hep-th]. 40

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  19. [21]

    GorbenkoandL

    V. GorbenkoandL. Senatore. λφ4 in dS, (2019). arXiv: 1911.00022 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  20. [22]

    SleightandM

    C. SleightandM. Taronna.From AdS to dS exchanges: Spectral representation, Mellin amplitudes, and crossing, Phys. Rev. D 104.8 (2021), L081902. arXiv: 2007. 09993 [hep-th]

    2021

  21. [23]

    Hogervorst,J

    M. Hogervorst,J. Penedones, andK. S. Vaziri.Towards the non-perturbative cosmological bootstrap, JHEP 02 (2023), 162. arXiv:2107.13871 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  22. [24]

    Anninos,F

    D. Anninos,F. Denef,Y. T. A. Law, andZ. Sun.Quantum de Sitter hori- zon entropy from quasicanonical bulk, edge, sphere and topological string partition functions, JHEP 01 (2022), 088. arXiv:2009.12464 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  23. [25]

    Di Pietro,V

    L. Di Pietro,V. Gorbenko, andS. Komatsu.Analyticity and unitarity for cosmological correlators, JHEP 03 (2022), 023. arXiv:2108.01695 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2022

  24. [26]

    V. A. Letsios.(Non-)unitarity of strictly and partially massless fermions on de Sitter space II: an explanation based on the group-theoretic properties of the spin-3/2 and spin-5/2 eigenmodes, J. Phys. A 57.13 (2024), 135401. arXiv: 2206 . 09851 [hep-th]

    2024

  25. [27]

    V. A. Letsios.(Non-)unitarity of strictly and partially massless fermions on de Sitter space, JHEP 05 (2023), 015. arXiv:2303.00420 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  26. [28]

    Penedones,K

    J. Penedones,K. Salehi Vaziri, andZ. Sun.Hilbert space of quantum field theory in de Sitter spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 111.4 (2025), 045001. arXiv: 2301.04146 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  27. [29]

    Loparco,J

    M. Loparco,J. Penedones,K. Salehi Vaziri, andZ. Sun.The K¨ all´ en-Lehmann representation in de Sitter spacetime, JHEP 12 (2023), 159. arXiv: 2306.00090 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  28. [30]

    V. A. LetsiosandS. Vitouladitis.Axions on de Sitter space, (2026). arXiv: 2606.28858 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  29. [31]

    Anninos,T

    D. Anninos,T. Anous, andA. Rios Fukelman.De Sitter at all loops: the story of the Schwinger model, JHEP 08 (2024), 155. arXiv:2403.16166 [hep-th]. [32]C. Jayewardena.Schwinger model onS 2, Helv. Phys. Acta 61 (1988), 636–711

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [33]

    Smith.A Note on the Perturbative Expansion of the Schwinger Model on S2, (2026)

    J. Smith.A Note on the Perturbative Expansion of the Schwinger Model on S2, (2026). arXiv:2603.21938 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2026

  31. [34]

    Aguilera-Damia,D

    J. Aguilera-Damia,D. Anninos,T. Anous,J. Gleeson, andA. Rios Fukel- man.de Sitter Vacua & pUniverses, (2026). arXiv:2605.02883 [hep-th]. [35]T. Anous,J. Gleeson,P. Paul, andA. Rios Fukelman, to appear

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  32. [36]

    L´opez Nacir,F

    D. L´opez Nacir,F. D. Mazzitelli, andL. G. Trombetta. O(N)model in Euclidean de Sitter space: beyond the leading infrared approximation, JHEP 09 (2016), 117. arXiv:1606.03481 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [37]

    Di Pietro,V

    L. Di Pietro,V. Gorbenko, andS. Komatsu.Cosmological Correlators at Finite Coupling, (2023). arXiv:2312.17195 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  34. [38]

    O. Diego,J. Gonzalez, andJ. Salas.The Ising model on spherical lattices: Dimer versus Monte Carlo approach, J. Phys. A 27 (1994), 2965–2983. arXiv: hep-lat/9307018

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  35. [39]

    Hoelbling,A

    C. Hoelbling,A. Jakovac,J. Jersak,C. B. Lang, andT. Neuhaus.Spin and gauge systems on spherical lattices, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 47 (1996). Ed. byT. D. Kieu,B. H. J. McKellar, andA. J. Guttmann, 815–818. arXiv: hep-lat/9509009. 41

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  36. [40]

    HolmandW

    C. HolmandW. Janke.Ising spins on a gravitating sphere, Phys. Lett. B 375 (1996), 69–74. arXiv:hep-lat/9512002

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  37. [41]

    HoelblingandC

    C. HoelblingandC. B. Lang.Universality of the Ising model on sphere-like lattices, Phys. Rev. B 54 (1996), 3434. arXiv:hep-lat/9602025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  38. [42]

    R. C. BrowerandE. K. Owen.The Ising Model on S2, (2024). arXiv: 2407.00459 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  39. [43]

    J. B. HartleandS. W. Hawking.Wave function of the Universe, Phys. Rev. D 28 12 (1983), 2960–2975

    1983

  40. [44]

    Miller.Path integral games with de Sitter α-vacua, JHEP 10 (2025), 097

    N. Miller.Path integral games with de Sitter α-vacua, JHEP 10 (2025), 097. arXiv: 2503.13701 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  41. [45]

    KirstenandJ

    K. KirstenandJ. Garriga.Massless minimally coupled fields in de Sitter space: O(4) symmetric states versus de Sitter invariant vacuum, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993), 567–577. arXiv:gr-qc/9305013

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  42. [46]

    Baumann,D

    D. Baumann,D. Green,A. Joyce,E. Pajer,G. L. Pimentel,C. Sleight, andM. Taronna.Snowmass White Paper: The Cosmological Bootstrap, SciPost Phys. Comm. Rep. 2024 (2024), 1. arXiv:2203.08121 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  43. [47]

    L. H. Ford.Quantum instability of de Sitter spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 31 4 (1985), 710–717

    1985

  44. [48]

    Antoniadis,J

    I. Antoniadis,J. Iliopoulos, andT. N. Tomaras.Quantum Instability of de Sitter Space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 13 (1986), 1319–1322

    1986

  45. [49]

    TsamisandR

    N. TsamisandR. Woodard.Strong Infrared Effects in Quantum Gravity, Annals of Physics 238.1 (1995), 1–82

    1995

  46. [50]

    SenatoreandM

    L. SenatoreandM. Zaldarriaga.On Loops in Inflation, JHEP 12 (2010), 008. arXiv:0912.2734 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  47. [51]

    A. M. Polyakov.Infrared instability of the de Sitter space, (2012). arXiv: 1209. 4135 [hep-th]

    2012

  48. [52]

    E. T. Akhmedov,U. Moschella, andF. K. Popov.Characters of different secular effects in various patches of de Sitter space, (2019). arXiv: 1901.07293 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  49. [53]

    GreenandA

    D. GreenandA. Premkumar.Dynamical RG and Critical Phenomena in de Sitter Space, JHEP 04 (2020), 064. arXiv:2001.05974 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  50. [54]

    DoyonandP

    B. DoyonandP. Fonseca.Ising field theory on a Pseudosphere, J. Stat. Mech. 0407 (2004), P07002. arXiv:hep-th/0404136

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  51. [55]

    Spradlin,A

    M. Spradlin,A. Strominger, andA. Volovich.Les Houches lectures on de Sitter space.Les Houches Summer School: Session 76: Euro Summer School on Unity of Fundamental Physics: Gravity, Gauge Theory and Strings. (2001), 423–453. arXiv:hep-th/0110007

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  52. [56]

    D. A. Galante.Modave lectures on de Sitter space & holography, PoS Modave2022 (2023), 003. arXiv:2306.10141 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  53. [57]

    Hirai.On irreducible representations of the Lorentz group of n-th order, Pro- ceedings of the Japan Academy 38.6 (1962), 258–262

    T. Hirai.On irreducible representations of the Lorentz group of n-th order, Pro- ceedings of the Japan Academy 38.6 (1962), 258–262

    1962

  54. [58]

    Ottoson.A Classification of the Unitary Irreducible Representations ofSO0(N, 1), Communications in Mathematical Physics 8.3 (1968), 228–244

    U. Ottoson.A Classification of the Unitary Irreducible Representations ofSO0(N, 1), Communications in Mathematical Physics 8.3 (1968), 228–244

    1968

  55. [59]

    Schwarz.Unitary irreducible representations of the groups SO(n, 1), Journal of Mathematical Physics 12.1 (1971), 131–139

    F. Schwarz.Unitary irreducible representations of the groups SO(n, 1), Journal of Mathematical Physics 12.1 (1971), 131–139. 42

    1971

  56. [60]

    Basile,X

    T. Basile,X. Bekaert, andN. Boulanger.Mixed-symmetry fields in de Sitter space: a group theoretical glance, JHEP 05 (2017), 081. arXiv:1612.08166 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  57. [61]

    Sun.A note on the representations of SO(1,d + 1), Rev

    Z. Sun.A note on the representations of SO(1,d + 1), Rev. Math. Phys. 37.01 (2025), 2430007. arXiv:2111.04591 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  58. [62]

    S ¸eng¨or.Particles of a de Sitter Universe, Universe 9.2 (2023), 59

    G. S ¸eng¨or.Particles of a de Sitter Universe, Universe 9.2 (2023), 59. arXiv: 2212.10626 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  59. [63]

    Enayati,J.-P

    M. Enayati,J.-P. Gazeau,H. Pejhan, andA. Wang.The de Sitter (dS) Group and its Representations. An Introduction to Elementary Systems and Modeling the Dark Energy Universe. Synthesis Lectures on Mathematics & Statistics. Springer (2023). arXiv:2201.11457 [math-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  60. [64]

    Schaub.A Walk Through Spin(1,d + 1), (2024)

    V. Schaub.A Walk Through Spin(1,d + 1), (2024). arXiv: 2405.01659 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  61. [65]

    Hinterbichler.De Sitter Representations, (2026)

    K. Hinterbichler.De Sitter Representations, (2026). arXiv: 2606.26221 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  62. [66]

    Kitaev.Notes on ˜SL(2,R )representations, (2017)

    A. Kitaev.Notes on ˜SL(2,R )representations, (2017). arXiv: 1711.08169 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  63. [67]

    Higuchi,D

    A. Higuchi,D. Marolf, andI. A. Morrison.On the Equivalence between Euclidean and In-In Formalisms in de Sitter QFT, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011), 084029. arXiv:1012.3415 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  64. [68]

    AllenandT

    B. AllenandT. Jacobson.Vector Two Point Functions in Maximally Symmetric Spaces, Commun. Math. Phys. 103 (1986), 669

    1986

  65. [69]

    CamporesiandA

    R. CamporesiandA. Higuchi.On the eigenfunctions of the Dirac operator on spheres and real hyperbolic spaces, J. Geom. Phys. 20 (1996), 1–18. arXiv: gr-qc/9505009

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  66. [70]

    V. A. Letsios.The eigenmodes for spinor quantum field theory in global de Sitter space–time, J. Math. Phys. 62.3 (2021), 032303. arXiv:2011.07875 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  67. [71]

    Schaub.Spinors in (Anti-)de Sitter Space

    V. Schaub.Spinors in (Anti-)de Sitter Space. (2023). arXiv: 2302.08535 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  68. [72]

    Salehi Vaziri.A non-perturbative construction of the de Sitter late-time boundary, (2024)

    K. Salehi Vaziri.A non-perturbative construction of the de Sitter late-time boundary, (2024). arXiv:2412.00183 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  69. [73]

    Seng¨orandC

    G. Seng¨orandC. Skordis.Unitarity at the Late time Boundary of de Sitter, JHEP 06 (2020), 041. arXiv:1912.09885 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  70. [74]

    T. Cohen,D. Green, andY. Huang.Operator origin of anomalous dimensions in de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D 111.10 (2025), 103513. arXiv: 2407.08581 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  71. [75]

    Botshekananfard,E

    M. Botshekananfard,E. B ¨us ¸ra G¨uraksın,V. A. Letsios, andG. S ¸eng¨or. A discrete series gauge field at the late-time boundary ofdS 4, to appear (2026)

    2026

  72. [76]

    GuijosaandD

    A. GuijosaandD. A. Lowe.A New twist on dS / CFT, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004), 106008. arXiv:hep-th/0312282. [77]T. AnousandJ. Skulte.An invitation to the principal series, SciPost Phys. 9.3 (2020), 028

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  73. [78]

    Frohlich,J

    J. Frohlich,J. Fuchs,I. Runkel, andC. Schweigert.Kramers-Wannier duality from conformal defects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004), 070601. arXiv: cond- mat/0404051

    arXiv 2004

  74. [79]

    C.-M. Chang,Y. -H. Lin,S. -H. Shao,Y. Wang, andX. Yin.Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions, JHEP 01 (2019), 026. arXiv:1802.04445 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  75. [80]

    A. Karch,D. Tong, andC. Turner.A Web of 2d Dualities:Z 2 Gauge Fields and Arf Invariants, SciPost Phys. 7 (2019), 007. arXiv:1902.05550 [hep-th]. 43

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  76. [81]

    BhardwajandY

    L. BhardwajandY. Tachikawa.On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions, JHEP 03 (2018), 189. arXiv:1704.02330 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  77. [82]

    RunkelandG

    I. RunkelandG. M. T. Watts.Fermionic CFTs and classifying algebras, JHEP 06 (2020), 025. arXiv:2001.05055 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  78. [83]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov.Integrals of motion and S-matrix of the (scaled) T =Tc Ising model with magnetic field, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 4 (1989), 4235–4248

    1989

  79. [84]

    Delfino.Integrable field theory and critical phenomena: The Ising model in a magnetic field, J

    G. Delfino.Integrable field theory and critical phenomena: The Ising model in a magnetic field, J. Phys. A 37 (2004), R45–R78. arXiv:hep-th/0312119 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  80. [85]

    Ambrosino,I

    F. Ambrosino,I. Runkel, andG. M. T. Watts.Translation invariant defects as an extension of topological symmetries, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 41.07 (2026), 2648001. arXiv:2511.02007 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2026

Showing first 80 references.