Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 minor 74 references

Both late-time Maxwell operators on planar dS4 carry the unitary photon discrete series of SO(4,1), which splits by helicity.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 02:08 UTC pith:US2MJ5OS

load-bearing objection Clean free-field extension that puts both photon late-time modes on the discrete series and shows the helicity split on the planar patch; the eta-norm step is the only real soft spot.

arxiv 2607.25067 v1 pith:US2MJ5OS submitted 2026-07-27 hep-th gr-qc

A discrete series gauge field at the late-time boundary of dS₄

classification hep-th gr-qc
keywords de SitterMaxwell fielddiscrete serieslate-time operatorsSO(4,1)self-dual field strengthhelicityhigher-spin gravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies the free Maxwell field on the planar patch of four-dimensional de Sitter space, quantized in the Bunch-Davies vacuum. Taking the late-time limit produces two operators of conformal dimensions 1 and 2. With CFT-inspired inner products that are invariant under the de Sitter group, the states created by either operator are normalizable and realize the unitary discrete-series representation associated with the photon. Unlike the AdS case, the leading dimension-1 operator is not discarded as non-normalizable. The same representation further decomposes as a direct sum of opposite-helicity irreps, because the self-dual and anti-self-dual parts of the field strength never mix under de Sitter transformations. The result enlarges the catalogue of late-time operators that can serve as input for de Sitter holography and higher-spin constructions.

Core claim

States created by both the leading late-time operator α_j (Δ=1) and the subleading operator β_j (Δ=2), when equipped with the appropriate SO(4,1)-invariant exceptional-series inner products, furnish the unitary photon discrete series D_01 of SO(4,1). This representation splits as a direct sum of opposite-helicity irreducible representations realized by the self-dual and anti-self-dual sectors of the field strength.

What carries the argument

CFT-inspired densitized inner products built from the Dobrev et al. intertwiners G′±_01 that map between the Δ=1 and Δ=2 representation spaces; together with the de Sitter invariance of the self-dual and anti-self-dual field-strength sectors, they identify the late-time Hilbert space and enforce the helicity split.

Load-bearing premise

That the CFT-inspired late-time inner products, rather than the ordinary bulk Klein-Gordon product alone, are the correct norms that identify the planar-patch Hilbert space with the unitary discrete series of the full de Sitter group.

What would settle it

Compute the action of a finite special conformal transformation (or an explicit matrix element of a de Sitter charge) on the late-time states and check whether the densitized norms remain positive and finite while helicities stay unmixed; a negative or divergent norm, or helicity mixing, would falsify the identification.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Both Δ=1 and Δ=2 late-time Maxwell data can be retained as physical operators in any dS/CFT dictionary, unlike the AdS Maxwell story.
  • The photon discrete series on planar dS4 is reducible and equals the direct sum of two opposite-helicity irreps.
  • Commutation relations among the fixed-helicity late-time operators are completely determined and non-vanishing.
  • The same late-time construction supplies candidate operators for the microscopic gluing description of dS4 higher-spin gravity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same intertwiner-plus-self-duality method should extend immediately to the graviton and higher-spin gauge fields on planar dS4, producing analogous discrete-series late-time operators.
  • If the Q-model norm of the microscopic higher-spin dual assigns zero norm to states created by α_j, that operator would be identified with a pure conformal gauge field carrying no local degrees of freedom.
  • Explicit three-point correlators of the fixed-helicity late-time operators would give concrete, helicity-resolved predictions for the dual three-dimensional theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper studies free Maxwell theory on the planar patch of dS_4 in Coulomb gauge. It reviews Bunch-Davies canonical quantization, extracts the leading and subleading late-time operators alpha_j and beta_j of dimensions 1 and 2, and constructs exceptional/discrete-series inner products using the Dobrev-Mack-Petkova-Petrova-Todorov intertwiners. The alpha-sector has positive norm, while the beta-sector norm is obtained through beta'_j = beta_j/k. The paper further uses the dS invariance of the self-dual and anti-self-dual field-strength sectors to decompose the photon representation into opposite-helicity discrete-series summands. An outlook connects the Delta=1 operator to conformal gauge fields in proposed microscopic descriptions of dS higher-spin gravity.

Significance. If the conclusions hold, the paper gives an explicit late-time realization of the photon discrete series on planar dS_4, a setting where the representation-theoretic organization is less direct than in global dS. The calculations are parameter-free and unusually explicit: gauge fixing, Bunch-Davies modes, Klein-Gordon normalization, the late-time operators, dS charges, intertwiner norms, helicity projectors, and commutators are all displayed. The demonstration that both late-time modes are normalizable, in contrast with the familiar AdS treatment of the Delta=1 mode, and the helicity decomposition D_01 = D^+_01 + D^-_01, are useful additions to the dS/CFT and higher-spin literature. The higher-spin outlook is appropriately labeled as conjectural and is not needed for the main result.

minor comments (7)
  1. [Sec. 4.2, Eqs. (4.44)-(4.48)] The derivation here checks only the dilatation law (4.46) before saying that beta'_j = beta_j/k lies in C'^-_01. The result is nevertheless already available at state level: from (2.46), beta'_j(k)|0> = -i alpha_j(k)|0>, and Q(xi)|0> = 0, so the states generated by beta' transform in exactly the same representation as the alpha-states. Adding this argument, or explicitly checking the special-conformal action, would close the apparent gap in the claimed invariance of (4.47).
  2. [Sec. 2.4, Eqs. (2.60)-(2.62)] The terminology 'conformal primary' is stronger than what is checked in this subsection, where only dilatations are evaluated. Either verify the special-conformal condition as well, or state explicitly that the full so(4,1) action is supplied later through the bulk charges and the cited exceptional-series construction.
  3. [Sec. 4.2, Eqs. (4.23)-(4.24)] The normalization volume Omega is formally divergent because it contains delta^{(3)}(0). This is a familiar plane-wave prescription, but the Hilbert-space statement would be clearer if the inner product were first written for smeared wavepackets, with the momentum-space kernel and positivity displayed, and the plane-wave formula then presented as a shorthand.
  4. [Sec. 3.1 and Sec. 4.2] Because finite special conformal transformations do not preserve the planar patch, the repeated phrase 'SO(4,1)-invariant' should be qualified as invariance under the infinitesimal so(4,1) action realized on the patch, or the relevant group completion should be explained. Section 3.1 contains the necessary caveat, but it should also qualify the later inner-product claims.
  5. [Sec. 2.2, Eq. (2.35)] The index placement and metric factors in the displayed formula for pi_j are difficult to parse. The final proportionality to delta^{mj} d_eta A_m is the expected conformally invariant Maxwell result, but the intermediate contractions should be written consistently with whether A_m and pi_j carry upper or lower spatial indices.
  6. [Sec. 5.1, Eq. (5.7), and Sec. 5.2] The sentence following the equation says that '(SD) and (ASD) stand for anti-self-dual and self-dual, respectively'; the order is reversed. There is also an incomplete sentence in Sec. 5.2 beginning 'For real F_mn, the self-dual and anti-self-dual parts are complex conjugates...'.
  7. [References and Sec. 2.1] References [26] and [63] appear to be the same publication, 'Particles of a de Sitter Universe,' including the same arXiv number. One entry should be removed. There are also small typographical issues such as 'dimensions offmass' in the dimensional discussion following Eq. (2.13).

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No load-bearing circularity: photon discrete-series norms and helicity split are recomputed from bulk modes; self-citations only supply the scalar method template.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. 1 Introduction; Sec. 3.2; Sec. 4 opening]
    "Earlier on in [1] we started identifying late-time operators... In [2] we extended this study to the case of exceptional series... Similar late-time inner products for scalar fields (in any number of dimensions) have been discussed in [1, 2, 20]."

    Methodological self-citation only: the scalar late-time-operator and CFT-inspired-norm template is reused. It is not load-bearing for the photon result, which is recomputed from Maxwell modes, Dobrev intertwiners, and self-duality. Listed for completeness; does not raise the score above 1.

full rationale

The central claims (both Δ=1 α and Δ=2 β late-time states furnish unitary D_01 of SO(4,1), and that representation splits as discrete-series+ ⊕ discrete-series−) are obtained by explicit bulk calculation, not by renaming inputs. Bunch-Davies modes are Klein-Gordon-normalized and quantized (Sec. 2); late-time operators are read off from the η→0 expansion (2.44–2.46); densitized norms are evaluated with the external Dobrev–Mack intertwiners G′±_01 (4.17, 4.42) giving +2/π (4.32, 4.48); helicity non-mixing follows from Lie-derivative invariance of the Levi-Civita tensor and the resulting so(4,1) action on self-dual/anti-self-dual field strengths (5.13–5.14, 6.14–6.25). Self-citations to the authors’ scalar papers [1,2,20] supply only the late-time-operator method template; the photon answer is recomputed. The β-sector construction (β′=β/k importing the α inner product because native G′−_01 annihilates transverse β) relies on a known external isomorphism from Dobrev et al., not on a self-definitional loop. A possible incompleteness (SCT covariance of β′ checked only under dilatations) is a correctness gap, not circularity. No fitted parameters, no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors, no ansatz smuggled via self-citation. Score 1 only for the minor, non-load-bearing methodological self-citations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard free QFT on a fixed dS background, the Bunch-Davies vacuum, complete Coulomb-gauge fixing, and the classical harmonic-analysis catalogue of SO(4,1) exceptional/discrete series (Dobrev et al.). No free parameters are fitted. No new particles or forces are postulated; late-time operators are derived limits of the bulk field. The main non-standard modeling choice is the use of CFT-inspired late-time inner products (rather than bulk KG alone) to certify unitarity of the boundary Hilbert space on the planar patch.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Bunch-Davies vacuum is the correct de Sitter-invariant vacuum for the free Maxwell field on the planar patch.
    Used throughout sections 2–3 to define creation/annihilation operators and single-particle states; standard in cosmology but a choice among possible vacua.
  • standard math SO(4,1) exceptional/discrete-series classification, intertwiners G′±_01, and isomorphisms D_01 ≅ C′−_01/F′_01 from Dobrev et al. (1977) and related reviews.
    Section 4 imports the intertwiner catalogue and quotient-space realization to define the late-time inner products and identify D_01.
  • domain assumption CFT-inspired densitized late-time inner products (with intertwiners) correctly identify unitary SO(4,1) representations on states created by late-time operators acting on the BD vacuum.
    Section 4.2; this is the methodological premise of the authors’ program, not forced by bulk KG positivity alone on the planar patch.
  • domain assumption Complete classical gauge fixing A_η=0 and ∂_i A_i=0 leaves only the two physical helicities before quantization.
    Section 2; standard but essential so that late-time operators automatically live in the quotient by pure gauge.
  • domain assumption Infinitesimal so(4,1) action via Lie derivatives on the planar patch (finite SCTs not patch-preserving) is sufficient to diagnose representation content.
    Section 3.1 acknowledges the patch covers only half of dS; representation statements are at the algebra level.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-grok45-kimik3 · 41993 in / 3185 out tokens · 57427 ms · 2026-07-31T02:08:27.464545+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the free Maxwell field on the planar patch of four-dimensional de Sitter spacetime ($dS_4$). We review its bulk canonical quantization in the Bunch-Davies vacuum, and we give a representation-theoretic viewpoint by studying the transformation properties of single-particle states under infinitesimal dS transformations. By taking the late-time limit, we identify two late-time operators with scaling dimensions $\Delta=1$ (leading) and $\Delta=2$ (subleading). We introduce CFT-inspired inner products invariant under the dS group ($SO(4,1)$) for states created by late-time operators acting on the Bunch-Davies vacuum. We explain how the unitary discrete series representations of $SO(4,1)$ associated with the photon are furnished by both operators, in contrast with the Maxwell field on $AdS$ where the $\Delta=1$ operator corresponds to a non-normalizable mode. We also explain how the corresponding discrete series representations of $SO(4,1)$ split into a direct sum of representations corresponding to two helicities $+1$ and $-1$. This is achieved by taking advantage of the dS invariance of the self-dual and anti-self-dual sectors of the photon field strength. In our outlook, we draw inspiration from a recent proposal for the microscopic description of $dS_4$ higher-spin gravity where conformal gauge fields in 3 dimensions play a central role, and we investigate a possible connection of the $\Delta=1$ late-time operator with a conformal spin-1 gauge field in 3 dimensions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 53 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    S ¸eng¨ or and C

    G. S ¸eng¨ or and C. Skordis,Unitarity at the late time boundary of de sitter,Journal of High Energy Physics2020(2020) . 35Related discussions on spinning conformal gauge fields can be found in, e.g., [11, 74–76]. – 39 –

  2. [2]

    Sengor and C

    G. Sengor and C. Skordis,Scalar two-point functions at the late-time boundary of de Sitter, JHEP02(2024) 076 [2110.01635]

  3. [3]

    Witten,Quantum gravity in de Sitter space, inStrings 2001: International Conference, 6, 2001,hep-th/0106109

    E. Witten,Quantum gravity in de Sitter space, inStrings 2001: International Conference, 6, 2001,hep-th/0106109

  4. [4]

    Strominger,The dS / CFT correspondence,JHEP10(2001) 034 [hep-th/0106113]

    A. Strominger,The dS / CFT correspondence,JHEP10(2001) 034 [hep-th/0106113]

  5. [5]

    J. M. Maldacena,Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,JHEP05(2003) 013 [astro-ph/0210603]

  6. [6]

    J. P. van der Schaar,Inflationary perturbations from deformed CFT,JHEP01(2004) 070 [hep-th/0307271]

  7. [7]

    Pajer, G

    E. Pajer, G. L. Pimentel and J. V. S. Van Wijck,The Conformal Limit of Inflation in the Era of CMB Polarimetry,JCAP06(2017) 009 [1609.06993]

  8. [8]

    Bzowski, P

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden and K. Skenderis,Renormalisation of IR divergences and holography in de Sitter,JHEP05(2024) 053 [2312.17316]

  9. [9]

    Anninos, F

    D. Anninos, F. Denef, R. Monten and Z. Sun,Higher Spin de Sitter Hilbert Space,JHEP10 (2019) 071 [1711.10037]

  10. [10]

    Anninos, T

    D. Anninos, T. Hartman and A. Strominger,Higher Spin Realization of the dS/CFT Correspondence,Class. Quant. Grav.34(2017) 015009 [1108.5735]

  11. [11]

    Anninos, C

    D. Anninos, C. Baracco, V. A. Letsios and B. M¨ uhlmann,dS 4 Metamorphosis,2602.19812

  12. [12]

    Neiman,Antipodally symmetric gauge fields and higher-spin gravity in de Sitter space, JHEP10(2014) 153 [1406.3291]

    Y. Neiman,Antipodally symmetric gauge fields and higher-spin gravity in de Sitter space, JHEP10(2014) 153 [1406.3291]

  13. [13]

    David and Y

    A. David and Y. Neiman,Higher-spin symmetry vs. boundary locality, and a rehabilitation of dS/CFT,JHEP10(2020) 127 [2006.15813]

  14. [14]

    Hogervorst, J

    M. Hogervorst, J. Penedones and K. S. Vaziri,Towards the non-perturbative cosmological bootstrap,JHEP02(2023) 162 [2107.13871]

  15. [15]

    Salehi Vaziri,A non-perturbative construction of the de Sitter late-time boundary, 2412.00183

    K. Salehi Vaziri,A non-perturbative construction of the de Sitter late-time boundary, 2412.00183

  16. [16]

    V. K. Dobrev, G. Mack, V. B. Petkova, S. G. Petrova and I. T. Todorov,Harmonic Analysis on the n-Dimensional Lorentz Group and Its Application to Conformal Quantum Field Theory,Lect. Notes Phys.63(1977) 1

  17. [17]

    V. A. Letsios and S. Vitouladitis,Axions on de Sitter space,2606.28858

  18. [18]

    Chakraborty and J

    P. Chakraborty and J. Stout,Compact scalars at the cosmological collider,JHEP03(2024) 149 [2311.09219]

  19. [19]

    Chakraborty, T

    P. Chakraborty, T. Cohen, D. Green and Y. Huang,A compact story of positivity in de Sitter,JHEP06(2026) 272 [2508.08359]

  20. [20]

    G. S ¸eng¨ or,Searching for discrete series representations at the late-time boundary of de Sitter, in15th International Workshop on Lie Theory and Its Applications in Physics, 12, 2023,2312.00363

  21. [21]

    Anninos, T

    D. Anninos, T. Anous, B. Pethybridge and G. S ¸eng¨ or,The Discreet Charm of the Discrete Series in DS 2,2307.15832

  22. [22]

    Hinterbichler,De Sitter Representations,2606.26221

    K. Hinterbichler,De Sitter Representations,2606.26221. – 40 –

  23. [23]

    Basile, X

    T. Basile, X. Bekaert and N. Boulanger,Mixed-symmetry fields in de Sitter space: a group theoretical glance,JHEP05(2017) 081 [1612.08166]

  24. [24]

    Sun,A note on the representations of SO(1, d+ 1), 2021

    Z. Sun,A note on the representations of SO(1, d+ 1), 2021

  25. [25]

    Penedones, K

    J. Penedones, K. Salehi Vaziri and Z. Sun,Hilbert space of quantum field theory in de Sitter spacetime,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 045001 [2301.04146]

  26. [27]

    Rios Fukelman, M

    A. Rios Fukelman, M. Semp´ e and G. A. Silva,Notes on Gauge Fields and Discrete Series representations in de Sitter spacetimes,2310.14955

  27. [28]

    Loparco, J

    M. Loparco, J. Penedones and Y. Ulrich,What is a photon in de Sitter spacetime?, 2505.00761

  28. [29]

    Garidi, J.-P

    T. Garidi, J.-P. Gazeau, S. Rouhani and M. V. Takook,’Massless’ vector field in de Sitter Universe,J. Math. Phys.49(2008) 032501 [gr-qc/0608004]

  29. [30]

    Gazeau and M

    J.-P. Gazeau and M. V. Takook,’Massive’ vector field in de Sitter space,J. Math. Phys.41 (2000) 5920 [gr-qc/9912080]

  30. [31]

    Higuchi,Linearized gravity in de Sitter space-time as a representation of SO(4,1),Class

    A. Higuchi,Linearized gravity in de Sitter space-time as a representation of SO(4,1),Class. Quant. Grav.8(1991) 2005

  31. [32]

    Higuchi,Forbidden Mass Range for Spin-2 Field Theory in De Sitter Space-time,Nucl

    A. Higuchi,Forbidden Mass Range for Spin-2 Field Theory in De Sitter Space-time,Nucl. Phys. B282(1987) 397

  32. [33]

    Higuchi,Symmetric Tensor Spherical Harmonics on theNSphere and Their Application to the De Sitter Group SO(N,1),J

    A. Higuchi,Symmetric Tensor Spherical Harmonics on theNSphere and Their Application to the De Sitter Group SO(N,1),J. Math. Phys.28(1987) 1553

  33. [34]

    Higuchi,QUANTUM FIELDS OF NONZERO SPIN IN DE SITTER SPACE-TIME, other thesis, 5, 1987

    A. Higuchi,QUANTUM FIELDS OF NONZERO SPIN IN DE SITTER SPACE-TIME, other thesis, 5, 1987

  34. [35]

    V. A. Letsios,(Non-)unitarity of strictly and partially massless fermions on de Sitter space II: an explanation based on the group-theoretic properties of the spin-3/2 and spin-5/2 eigenmodes,J. Phys. A57(2024) 135401 [2206.09851]

  35. [36]

    V. A. Letsios,New conformal-like symmetry of strictly massless fermions in four-dimensional de Sitter space,JHEP05(2024) 078 [2310.01702]

  36. [37]

    V. A. Letsios,(Non-)unitarity of strictly and partially massless fermions on de Sitter space, JHEP05(2023) 015 [2303.00420]

  37. [38]

    Anninos, C

    D. Anninos, C. Baracco, V. A. Letsios and G. A. Silva,Fermionic fields of higher spin in de Sitter space,2510.19652

  38. [39]

    Schaub,A Walk ThroughSpin(1, d+ 1),2405.01659

    V. Schaub,A Walk ThroughSpin(1, d+ 1),2405.01659

  39. [41]

    V. A. Letsios,Unconventional conformal invariance of maximal depth partially massless fields on dS 4 and its relation to complex partially massless SUSY,JHEP08(2024) 147 [2311.10060]

  40. [42]

    Deser and A

    S. Deser and A. Waldron,Arbitrary spin representations in de Sitter from dS / CFT with applications to dS supergravity,Nucl. Phys. B662(2003) 379 [hep-th/0301068]

  41. [43]

    Boulanger, V

    N. Boulanger, V. A. Letsios and S. Thom´ ee,The complete action forN= 2de Sitter pure supergravity,2601.16891. – 41 –

  42. [44]

    Joung, J

    E. Joung, J. Mourad and R. Parentani,Group theoretical approach to quantum fields in de Sitter space. II. The complementary and discrete series,JHEP09(2007) 030 [0707.2907]

  43. [45]

    J. Bros, H. Epstein and U. Moschella,Scalar tachyons in the de Sitter universe,Lett. Math. Phys.93(2010) 203 [1003.1396]

  44. [46]

    Farnsworth, K

    K. Farnsworth, K. Hinterbichler and S. Saha,Hidden conformal symmetry of the discrete series scalars in dS2,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 105002 [2410.19041]

  45. [47]

    V. A. Letsios, B. Pethybridge and A. Rios Fukelman,Quite Discrete for a fermion, 2501.03724

  46. [48]

    Galati and S

    G. Galati and S. Vitouladitis,Ising the way into de Sitter,2607.14219

  47. [49]

    Anninos, P

    D. Anninos, P. Benetti Genolini and B. M¨ uhlmann,dS 2 supergravity,JHEP11(2023) 145 [2309.02480]

  48. [50]

    Anninos, T

    D. Anninos, T. Anous and A. Rios Fukelman,De Sitter at all loops: the story of the Schwinger model,JHEP08(2024) 155 [2403.16166]

  49. [51]

    Higuchi and V

    A. Higuchi and V. A. Letsios,Unitary rigid supersymmetry for the chiral graviton and chiral gravitino in de Sitter spacetime,JHEP12(2025) 104 [2503.04515]

  50. [52]

    Seng¨ or,The de Sitter group and its presence at the late-time boundary,PoS CORFU2021(2022) 356 [2206.04719]

    G. Seng¨ or,The de Sitter group and its presence at the late-time boundary,PoS CORFU2021(2022) 356 [2206.04719]

  51. [53]

    Lindsay and T

    A. Lindsay and T. R. Taylor,Symmetries of de Sitter particles and amplitudes,JHEP04 (2026) 064 [2512.13781]

  52. [54]

    T. R. Taylor and B. Zhu,Three-Gluon Scattering Amplitude in de Sitter Spacetime, 2604.24844

  53. [55]

    I. I. Cotaescu and C. Crucean,The Quantum theory of the free Maxwell field on the de Sitter expanding universe,Prog. Theor. Phys.124(2010) 1051 [0806.2515]

  54. [56]

    H. Lee, D. Baumann and G. L. Pimentel,Non-Gaussianity as a Particle Detector,JHEP12 (2016) 040 [1607.03735]

  55. [57]

    M. M. Anber and L. Sorbo,Naturally inflating on steep potentials through electromagnetic dissipation,Physical Review D81(2010)

  56. [58]

    Armendariz-Picon, M

    C. Armendariz-Picon, M. Trodden and E. J. West,Preheating in derivatively coupled inflation models,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2008(2008) 036

  57. [59]

    A. A. Saharian, A. S. Kotanjyan and H. A. Nersisyan,Electromagnetic two-point functions and Casimir densities for a conducting plate in de Sitter spacetime,Phys. Lett. B728(2014) 141 [1307.5536]

  58. [60]

    Baumann,Tasi lectures on primordial cosmology, 2018

    D. Baumann,Tasi lectures on primordial cosmology, 2018

  59. [61]

    Arkani-Hamed and J

    N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Maldacena,Cosmological Collider Physics,1503.08043

  60. [62]

    NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions

    “NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions.”https://dlmf.nist.gov/, Release 1.2.7 of 2026-06-15

  61. [63]

    S ¸eng¨ or,Particles of a de Sitter Universe,Universe9(2023) 59 [2212.10626]

    G. S ¸eng¨ or,Particles of a de Sitter Universe,Universe9(2023) 59 [2212.10626]

  62. [64]

    I. M. Gel’fand, M. I. Graev and N. Y. Vilenkin,Generalized Functions, Volume 5: Integral Geometry and Representation Theory. AMS Chelsea Publishing, Providence, Rhode Island, 2016. – 42 –

  63. [65]

    Gazeau and H

    J.-P. Gazeau and H. Pejhan,A Misleading Naming Convention: De Sitter ‘Tachyonic’ Scalar Fields,Found. Phys.55(2025) 8 [2403.17539]

  64. [66]

    Sengor and C

    G. Sengor and C. Skordis,Principal and Complementary Series Representations at the Late-Time Boundary of de Sitter,Springer Proc. Math. Stat.396(2022) 269 [2205.11550]

  65. [67]

    Ottoson,A classification of the unitary irreducible representations ofso(n,1),

    U. Ottoson,A classification of the unitary irreducible representations ofso(n,1),

  66. [68]

    Schwarz,Unitary irreducible representations of the groups so (n, 1),Journal of Mathematical Physics12(1971) 131

    F. Schwarz,Unitary irreducible representations of the groups so (n, 1),Journal of Mathematical Physics12(1971) 131

  67. [69]

    Pethybridge and V

    B. Pethybridge and V. Schaub,Tensors and spinors in de Sitter space,JHEP06(2022) 123 [2111.14899]

  68. [70]

    Neiman,Holographic quantization of linearized higher-spin gravity in the de Sitter causal patch,JHEP11(2018) 033 [1809.07270]

    Y. Neiman,Holographic quantization of linearized higher-spin gravity in the de Sitter causal patch,JHEP11(2018) 033 [1809.07270]

  69. [71]

    M. A. Vasiliev,Consistent equation for interacting gauge fields of all spins in (3+1)-dimensions,Phys. Lett. B243(1990) 378

  70. [72]

    Anninos, V

    D. Anninos, V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, A. Kehagias and A. Riotto,Cosmological Shapes of Higher-Spin Gravity,JCAP04(2019) 045 [1902.01251]

  71. [73]

    De and H

    S. De and H. Lee,The Vasiliev Grassmannian,2603.24656

  72. [74]

    Giombi, I

    S. Giombi, I. R. Klebanov, S. S. Pufu, B. R. Safdi and G. Tarnopolsky,AdS Description of Induced Higher-Spin Gauge Theory,JHEP10(2013) 016 [1306.5242]

  73. [75]

    Anninos, F

    D. Anninos, F. Denef, Y. T. A. Law and Z. Sun,Quantum de Sitter horizon entropy from quasicanonical bulk, edge, sphere and topological string partition functions,JHEP01(2022) 088 [2009.12464]

  74. [76]

    Beccaria, X

    M. Beccaria, X. Bekaert and A. A. Tseytlin,Partition function of free conformal higher spin theory,JHEP08(2014) 113 [1406.3542]. – 43 –