Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 71 references

These notes argue that cosmology is naturally an open quantum system, with gravity as the observed subsystem and unknown cosmic ingredients as its environment, and they develop the master-equation and Schwinger–Keldysh machinery needed to w

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 02:19 UTC pith:C7OUFCPL

load-bearing objection A competent, honestly-scoped set of lecture notes that does what it says; the cosmological half is a bridge to the author's own papers, not an independent derivation. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.14351 v1 pith:C7OUFCPL submitted 2026-07-15 hep-th

Lectures on Open Systems and Cosmology

Enrico Pajer This is my paper
classification hep-th MSC 81S2283F0581T17
keywords open quantum systemsdensity matrixLindblad equationSchwinger–Keldysh formalisminfluence functionalopen effective field theoryinflationstochastic inflation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper's functional claim is pedagogical: cosmology is naturally an open-system problem. The gravitational degrees of freedom we observe — the metric, curvature perturbations, long-wavelength modes — are the accessible system, while the unknown ingredients that fill the universe, from the inflaton's microphysics to dark matter and dark energy, act as an environment. The notes aim to deliver a unified, self-contained introduction to the density-matrix and master-equation formalism, the Schwinger–Keldysh path integral, and open effective field theories, culminating in applications to inflation and stochastic inflation. A sympathetic reader would care because these cosmological sectors are spacetime-filling, mostly gravitational, out of equilibrium, and microscopically unknown — precisely the regime where open-system techniques convert ignorance of the environment into a systematic parametrization. The value of the lecture notes is that they assemble one consistent toolkit across subjects that are usually taught separately.

Core claim

The central claim, stated in the introduction, is that 'cosmology is naturally an open-system problem: the gravitational degrees of freedom, namely the metric itself, are the accessible system, while the unknown ingredients that fill the universe act as an environment.' The notes then construct the supporting toolkit in a unified notation: the reduced density matrix and its completely positive trace-preserving dynamics, the GKSL/Lindblad master equation with its jump operators, the Schwinger–Keldysh influence functional with its unitarity constraints, the open effective field theory of inflation built on the Goldstone boson of broken time translations, and stochastic inflation as a time-depe

What carries the argument

The two carrying objects are the reduced density matrix and the Feynman–Vernon influence functional. The reduced density matrix, obtained by tracing the full unitary state over the environment, defines the dynamical map whose most general Markovian generator is the Gorini–Kossakowski–Sudarshan–Lindblad equation, with jump operators encoding dissipation and decoherence. The influence functional, obtained by integrating out a Gaussian environment on the doubled Schwinger–Keldysh contour, produces branch-mixing terms: a retarded dissipation kernel and a symmetric noise kernel, subject to the constraints S[x,x]=0, Hermiticity, and ImS≥0. Locality in time turns the influence functional into a tim

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the initial state factorizes, ρ_SE(t0) = ρ_S(t0) ⊗ ρ_E(t0), with a stationary environment; without factorized initial conditions there is no state-independent dynamical map, and the entire master-equation and influence-functional machinery loses its substrate.

What would settle it

Compute the reduced dynamics of sub-horizon curvature perturbations starting from a correlated initial state such as the Bunch–Davies vacuum and compare with the factorized-state Lindblad prediction for the bispectrum; a measurable difference would locate the regime where the framework's assumption fails. Alternatively, check whether a given local Schwinger–Keldysh action with noise and friction satisfies the complete-positivity bound N_x N_p − N_xp² ≥ κ²/4; a violation would falsify the claim that it arises from unitary full-system evolution.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Inflationary correlators such as the power spectrum and bispectrum can be computed as in-in correlators of an open effective field theory, with environmental effects appearing as dissipation and noise.
  • The open EFT of inflation parametrizes the unknown microphysics of inflation through symmetry-constrained operators, without needing to specify what the environment actually is.
  • Stochastic inflation emerges naturally when the system–environment split is made time-dependent: long-wavelength modes obey a Langevin equation and a Fokker–Planck equation, capturing secular growth in de Sitter.
  • The framework transfers directly to dark matter and dark energy, where the observed sector couples to unknown components mainly through gravity.
  • The positivity-improved influence-functional construction lets one preserve complete positivity order by order, which is relevant for late-time resummations of secular effects.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is that the factorized-initial-state assumption is likely violated in realistic inflationary models, where system and environment are quantized from the same vacuum; the framework's state-independent maps then apply only after initial correlations decay or are negligible.
  • The complete-positivity noise–friction bound implies a fluctuation-dissipation-type constraint in cosmological settings; this could be probed by searching for squeezed-limit correlations or stochastic-inflation noise spectra that saturate the bound.
  • The open-system lens suggests treating late-time gravitational backreaction, information loss, and the cosmological constant problem as reduced dynamics of the metric interacting with an unobserved sector, rather than as closed-system questions.
  • Time-dependent system–environment splits, as in stochastic inflation, may offer a route to resum secular effects that a fixed split cannot capture.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. These lecture notes aim to provide a unified, self-contained introduction to open quantum systems and their application to cosmology, bringing together density-matrix/master-equation methods (§1–§3), the Schwinger–Keldysh path integral (§4–§5), inflationary perturbation theory (§6), the open EFT of inflation (§7), and stochastic inflation (§8). The advertised goal is pedagogical: no new scientific results are claimed, but the notes are intended to be a practical bridge for master's/PhD students. The audited portion (§1–§5.3) covers standard material: density matrices, quantum channels, Kraus/CPTP theory, the GKSL equation and its assumptions, explicit solutions, the Keldysh basis, the influence functional, and the relation between local SK actions and CP divisibility. The later sections, which are central to the cosmological pledge, are mostly delegated to references [4,5,7–11].

Significance. If the claims hold, these notes would be a genuinely useful resource, since the three toolkits are rarely presented in one notation and at one level. The strengths of the audited sections are real: the derivations of the purity criteria (1.30–1.36), the Schmidt decomposition, the Kraus representation (2.21–2.29), and the finite-dimensional GKSL form are correct and clearly organized; the Keldysh identities (4.38–4.41) and the influence-functional constraints (4.60) are derived carefully; and the assumptions behind the master equation are stated explicitly in §2.6. The notes also flag the factorized-initial-state assumption (§2.1) rather than hiding it. However, the central claim that open-system methods are the right organizing lens for cosmology is only as strong as §7–§8, and those sections are not developed to the same standard in the material audited. The pedagogical value of the advertised unification is therefore not fully demonstrated.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2.1, §4.3, §7.4] Eqs. (2.18) and (4.54) assume a factorized system–environment initial state, with stationarity of the environment in (2.114). The notes themselves call factorization 'stronger than it may first appear' in §2.1. In inflationary applications the environment (short-wavelength or hidden-sector modes) is usually quantized from the same vacuum as the system, so S–E correlations are generically nonzero. The audited text does not show how the open EFT of inflation constructed in §7 satisfies (2.18)/(4.54), nor does it explain what physical questions can still be addressed when correlations are present. Because the CPTP/GKSL machinery of §2–§5 rests on this assumption, the advertised unification overstates its domain unless this is addressed. Please add an explicit regime-of-validity statement, or a discussion of non-factorized initial conditions, in §7.
  2. [§7 (Open EFT of Inflation)] Section 7 is announced as 'mostly based on the original papers [7–11]' and is the direct basis for the paper's claim that cosmology is naturally an open-system problem. In the audited material, no derivation or summary of the key steps is provided that would allow the reader to check whether the influence functional obtained by integrating out short-wavelength/inflaton-sector modes is local, CP-divisible, and of GKSL type. If it is not, the semigroup/Lindblad toolkit developed earlier does not apply to the main application. This is a load-bearing gap for a pedagogical paper whose purpose is to make these tools accessible; I recommend adding a compact derivation, or at least a precise statement of the approximations under which the open EFT yields a CP-divisible local generator.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§1.1] Heading typo: 'V on Neumann entropy' should read 'Von Neumann entropy'.
  2. [Eq. (4.68)] 'S_IR' in 'Im S_IR ≥ 0' is a typo for 'S_IF' (the influence action).
  3. [§4.2] Typo: 'observartions' should be 'observations'.
  4. [§2.7] The equivalence between CP divisibility and a time-local GKSL generator is stated without the standard invertibility caveat for the intermediate map Φ(t2,t1). A footnote mentioning that the equivalence holds under differentiability/invertibility assumptions would prevent a misreading, since non-invertible maps occur naturally in open systems.
  5. [§2.5] The sentence 'the theorem also proves that the conjecture is true' is awkward and could be rephrased; presumably the conjecture is the GKSL form.
  6. [References] Since §6–§8 rely heavily on the author's own lecture notes [4,5] and papers [7–11], it would help the reader if the notes stated explicitly which results in those sections are new to these notes and which are reproductions of the cited works.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the notes are a self-contained review; self-references are provenance attributions, not load-bearing premises.

full rationale

The paper is a pedagogical lecture-note review rather than a claim of new derivations. The audited derivation chain is carried out in-text from stated assumptions: the Kraus representation is derived from unitary evolution plus partial trace (Eqs. 2.20–2.28); the GKSL form is obtained from a short-time CPTP expansion and from the Born/Markov/secular microphysical assumptions (Secs. 2.5–2.6); the Feynman–Vernon influence functional is computed explicitly for a Gaussian environment (Sec. 4.5); the SK constraints arise from an overlap of sourced environment states (Eqs. 4.64–4.72); and the Gaussian Lindblad dictionary is established by direct comparison (Sec. 5.2). None of these steps reduce a conclusion to its own input. The only self-references are source attributions, e.g. 'The review of cosmology and inflation are based on my own lecture notes for the Cosmology [4] and Field Theory in Cosmology [5] course... Section 7 is mostly based on the original papers [7,8,9,10,11].' These are transparency statements about provenance, not load-bearing premises: no derived result in the audited text is justified solely by these citations. The factorized initial-state assumption (2.18, 2.113–2.114) is explicitly flagged as 'stronger than it may first appear' and is presented as an assumption of the framework, not as a predicted outcome. No fitted parameter is relabelled as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem from the author's own prior work is invoked to forbid alternatives. The noted reliance of §7 on cited papers is a completeness/verification boundary of the notes, not a circular step. The score of 2 reflects the presence of minor self-citations that are not load-bearing.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The ledger is light because the paper is a review: no novel physics entities are introduced and nothing is fitted to data. What the central pedagogical claim rests on: (i) standard theorems invoked without full proof (GKSL, relative-entropy monotonicity, Bochner's theorem), (ii) the domain assumptions of the open-system framework itself — factorized initial conditions, stationary environment, Born–Markov–secular approximations — which the notes disclose and which are the real load-bearing premises for any cosmological application, and (iii) hand-chosen toy-model parameters that support no empirical claim. The invented-entities list is empty: the environment, influence functional, and Keldysh fields are formal tools, not newly postulated physics.

free parameters (1)
  • Toy-model dissipation and noise parameters (γ↓, γ↑, γϕ, κ, N_th, D_xx, D_pp, N_x, N_p, N_xp)
    Chosen by hand in the worked qubit, harmonic-oscillator, and Gaussian-SK examples (§§3.4–3.5, §5.2) purely for illustration. No empirical data are fitted and no scientific claim depends on their values; in the microscopic derivations they are formally traced back to bath correlation functions (Eq. 2.129).
axioms (6)
  • standard math GKSL theorem: every continuous CPTP one-parameter semigroup has a Lindblad-form generator, with positive Kossakowski matrix.
    Invoked in §2.5; only a 'physics-style sketch' of the finite-dimensional proof is given (Eqs. 2.71–2.80). The full statement and converse are imported from Refs. [20,21].
  • standard math Monotonicity of quantum relative entropy under CPTP maps, and Klein's inequality.
    Used in §1.4 (subadditivity, Eq. 1.165) and §3.2 (unital maps cannot decrease von Neumann entropy). The notes explicitly say this is 'a powerful result, which we invoke without proof' (§3.2).
  • standard math Bochner's theorem: the Fourier transform of a positive-type function is non-negative.
    Used in §2.6 (Eqs. 2.130–2.131) to establish γ_{αβ}(ω) ≥ 0, the step that guarantees the Born–Markov–secular master equation takes GKSL form.
  • domain assumption Factorized initial state ρ_SE(t0) = ρ_S(t0) ⊗ ρ_E(t0) and stationary environment [H_E, ρ_E] = 0.
    Stated in §2.1 (Eq. 2.18) and §2.6 (Eqs. 2.113–2.114). The notes themselves flag factorization as 'stronger than it may first appear'; without it no state-independent CPTP map Φ_t exists. All cosmological applications inherit this premise.
  • domain assumption Born–Markov–secular approximations for deriving the Lindblad equation from unitary S+E dynamics.
    Listed in §2.6 as the microphysical route to Lindblad form. Their validity in cosmological settings (non-stationary backgrounds, long-lived environmental modes) is not established in the notes; they are standard working assumptions of the field.
  • standard math Schmidt decomposition / singular value decomposition for bipartite pure states.
    Sketch-proof given in §1.4 (Eqs. 1.131–1.133); used throughout to relate reduced density matrices, entanglement entropy, and purity.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 59326 in / 20755 out tokens · 189941 ms · 2026-08-02T02:19:54.062568+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Open systems are ubiquitous in physics. Many realistic systems interact, at least weakly, with environmental degrees of freedom that may be too numerous, too complicated, inaccessible, or unknown. When only a subset of degrees of freedom is observed, its reduced dynamics can differ qualitatively from that of a closed system, displaying dissipation, noise, decoherence, memory effects, or loss of information into unobserved sectors. When the microscopic description is also unknown, one is led to an open effective description, in which the relevant degrees of freedom are treated systematically while the environment and the microscopics are parametrized rather than solved for explicitly. This perspective is especially important in gravity and cosmology. The main open problems of cosmology, including inflation, dark matter, and dark energy, involve spacetime-filling sectors whose microscopic nature is unknown and whose observed effects are primarily gravitational. At the same time, gravitational systems often lack a preferred notion of conserved energy because they are time dependent, and naturally display out-of-equilibrium dynamics. These lecture notes introduce the operator formalism and the Schwinger-Keldysh path-integral as tools to study open systems, with emphasis on open effective field theories and inflation. They are aimed at master students, PhD students, and researchers approaching these topics for the first time.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.14351 by Enrico Pajer.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The Bloch ball for a two-level quantum system. Any qubit density matrix can be [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The SK contour on the complex t plane. The parenthesis after ρ(t0) indicates that the boundary conditions x±,0 of the path integral should be averaged over the initial density matrix. The forward and backward contours are slightly separated in the imaginary direction for clarity. The closed-time contour The goal in life of the path integral is to compute path-ordered correlation functions. If the path runs… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The SK contour featuring the insertion of two operators on the plus branch corre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p069_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Cutting open the closed-time path turns the SK path integral into a dynamical map [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p078_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Poles of the retarded propagator in the complex frequency plane for the massless [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p091_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Free-form Bayesian Figure 6: Observations from Planck 2018 [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p095_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The figure shows numerical evaluations of the shape of the bispectrum for small [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p116_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Shape correlation of the Open EFToI bispectrum with the standard [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p117_8.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Principles of quantum mechanics

    D. Skinner, “Principles of quantum mechanics.” Lecture notes, University of Cambridge

  2. [2]

    Breuer and F

    H.P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The theory of Open Quantum Systems, Oxford University Press (2002), 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199213900.001.0001

    arXiv 2002

  3. [3]

    Kamenev,Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems, Cambridge University Press (2011), 10.1017/CBO9781139003667

    A. Kamenev,Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems, Cambridge University Press (2011), 10.1017/CBO9781139003667

    doi:10.1017/cbo9781139003667 2011

  4. [4]

    Cosmology

    E. Pajer, “Cosmology.” Lecture notes, University of Cambridge

  5. [5]

    Field theory in cosmology

    E. Pajer, “Field theory in cosmology.” Lecture notes, University of Cambridge

  6. [6]

    X. Chen, Y. Wang and Z.-Z. Xianyu,Schwinger-Keldysh Diagrammatics for Primordial Perturbations,JCAP12(2017) 006

    2017

  7. [7]

    Creminelli, M.A

    P. Creminelli, M.A. Luty, A. Nicolis and L. Senatore,Starting the Universe: Stable Violation of the Null Energy Condition and Non-standard Cosmologies,JHEP12(2006) 080 [hep-th/0606090]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  8. [8]

    Cheung, P

    C. Cheung, P. Creminelli, A.L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan and L. Senatore,The Effective Field Theory of Inflation,JHEP03(2008) 014

    2008

  9. [9]

    Lopez Nacir, R.A

    D. Lopez Nacir, R.A. Porto, L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga,Dissipative effects in the Effective Field Theory of Inflation,JHEP01(2012) 075 [1109.4192]. 134

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  10. [10]

    Salcedo, T

    S.A. Salcedo, T. Colas and E. Pajer,The Open Effective Field Theory of Inflation,JHEP 10(2024) 248 [2404.15416]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    Salcedo, T

    S.A. Salcedo, T. Colas, P. Suman, B. Zhang, J. Fergusson and E.P.S. Shellard,Primordial non-Gaussianity constraints on dissipative inflation,2603.13473

    arXiv

  12. [12]

    Woodard,Recent Developments in Stochastic Inflation,2501.15843

    R.P. Woodard,Recent Developments in Stochastic Inflation,2501.15843

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    Cruces,Review on Stochastic Approach to Inflation,Universe8(2022) 334 [2203.13852]

    D. Cruces,Review on Stochastic Approach to Inflation,Universe8(2022) 334 [2203.13852]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  14. [14]

    Vennin,Stochastic inflation and primordial black holes, Ph.D

    V. Vennin,Stochastic inflation and primordial black holes, Ph.D. thesis, AstroParticule et Cosmologie, France, U. Paris-Saclay, 6, 2020.2009.08715

    arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    Calzetta and B.-L.B

    E.A. Calzetta and B.-L.B. Hu,Nonequilibrium Quantum Field Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (Sept., 2008), 10.1017/CBO9780511535123

    doi:10.1017/cbo9780511535123 2008

  16. [16]

    Liu and P

    H. Liu and P. Glorioso,Lectures on non-equilibrium effective field theories and fluctuating hydrodynamics,PoST ASI2017(2018) 008 [1805.09331]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  17. [17]

    Rivas, S.F

    ´A. Rivas, S.F. Huelga and M.B. Plenio,Quantum non-markovianity: Characterization, quantification and detection,Reports on Progress in Physics77(2014) 094001 [1405.0303]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  18. [18]

    Colas,Lectures on Open Effective Field Theories, 9, 2025 [2510.00140]

    T. Colas,Lectures on Open Effective Field Theories, 9, 2025 [2510.00140]

    arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Sieberer, M

    L.M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold and S. Diehl,Keldysh field theory for driven open quantum systems,Reports on Progress in Physics79(2016) 096001 [1512.00637]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  20. [20]

    Gorini, A

    V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski and E.C.G. Sudarshan,Completely positive dynamical semigroups of n-level systems,Journal of Mathematical Physics17(1976) 821 [https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jmp/article-pdf/17/5/821/19090720/821 1 online.pdf]

    1976

  21. [21]

    Lindblad,On the Generators of Quantum Dynamical Semigroups,Commun

    G. Lindblad,On the Generators of Quantum Dynamical Semigroups,Commun. Math. Phys.48(1976) 119

    1976

  22. [22]

    Schwinger,Brownian motion of a quantum oscillator,J

    J.S. Schwinger,Brownian motion of a quantum oscillator,J. Math. Phys.2(1961) 407

    1961

  23. [23]

    Keldysh,Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes,Zh

    L.V. Keldysh,Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes,Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.47 (1964) 1515

    1964

  24. [24]

    Polchinski,String theory

    J. Polchinski,String theory. Vol. 1: An introduction to the bosonic string, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (12, 2007), 10.1017/CBO9780511816079

    doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816079 2007

  25. [25]

    Aleiner, L

    I.L. Aleiner, L. Faoro and L.B. Ioffe,Microscopic model of quantum butterfly effect: out-of-time-order correlators and traveling combustion waves,Annals Phys.375(2016) 378 [1609.01251]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  26. [26]

    Haehl, R

    F.M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, P. Narayan and M. Rangamani,Classification of out-of-time-order correlators,SciPost Phys.6(2019) 001 [1701.02820]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  27. [27]

    Feynman and F

    R. Feynman and F. Vernon,The theory of a general quantum system interacting with a linear dissipative system,Annals of Physics24(1963) 118

    1963

  28. [28]

    Glorioso and H

    P. Glorioso and H. Liu,The second law of thermodynamics from symmetry and unitarity, 1612.07705. 135

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    Martin, E.D

    P.C. Martin, E.D. Siggia and H.A. Rose,Statistical dynamics of classical systems,Phys. Rev. A8(1973) 423

    1973

  30. [30]

    Akrami and others,Planck 2018 results

    Y. Akrami and others,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A10

    2018

  31. [31]

    Weinberg,Quantum contributions to cosmological correlations,Phys

    S. Weinberg,Quantum contributions to cosmological correlations,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 043514 [hep-th/0506236]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  32. [32]

    Goodhew,The Cosmological Implications of Unitarity, Ph.D

    H. Goodhew,The Cosmological Implications of Unitarity, Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge U., DAMTP, 2023. 10.17863/CAM.99550

    work page doi:10.17863/cam.99550 2023

  33. [33]

    Babich, P

    D. Babich, P. Creminelli and M. Zaldarriaga,The Shape of non-Gaussianities,JCAP08 (2004) 009 [astro-ph/0405356]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  34. [34]

    Maldacena,Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,JHEP05(2003) 013

    J.M. Maldacena,Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,JHEP05(2003) 013

    2003

  35. [35]

    Creminelli and M

    P. Creminelli and M. Zaldarriaga,Single field consistency relation for the 3-point function,JCAP10(2004) 006 [astro-ph/0407059]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  36. [36]

    Flauger, D

    R. Flauger, D. Green and R.A. Porto,On squeezed limits in single-field inflation. Part I, JCAP08(2013) 032 [1303.1430]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  37. [37]

    Creminelli, C

    P. Creminelli, C. Pitrou and F. Vernizzi,The CMB bispectrum in the squeezed limit, JCAP11(2011) 025 [1109.1822]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  38. [38]

    Hinterbichler, L

    K. Hinterbichler, L. Hui and J. Khoury,Conformal Symmetries of Adiabatic Modes in Cosmology,JCAP08(2012) 017 [1203.6351]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  39. [39]

    Hinterbichler, L

    K. Hinterbichler, L. Hui and J. Khoury,An Infinite Set of Ward Identities for Adiabatic Modes in Cosmology,JCAP01(2014) 039 [1304.5527]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  40. [40]

    Creminelli, J

    P. Creminelli, J. Nore˜ na and M. Simonovi´ c,Conformal consistency relations for single-field inflation,JCAP07(2012) 052 [1203.4595]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  41. [41]

    Pajer, F

    E. Pajer, F. Schmidt and M. Zaldarriaga,The Observed Squeezed Limit of Cosmological Three-Point Functions,Phys. Rev.D88(2013) 083502

    2013

  42. [42]

    L. Dai, E. Pajer and F. Schmidt,Conformal Fermi Coordinates,JCAP11(2015) 043 [1502.02011]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  43. [43]

    Creminelli, A

    P. Creminelli, A. Perko, L. Senatore, M. Simonovi´ c and G. Trevisan,The Physical Squeezed Limit: Consistency Relations at Order$qˆ2$,JCAP11(2013) 015

    2013

  44. [44]

    Cabass, E

    G. Cabass, E. Pajer and F. Schmidt,How Gaussian can our Universe be?,JCAP01 (2017) 003 [1612.00033]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  45. [45]

    Pajer and S

    E. Pajer and S. Jazayeri,Systematics of Adiabatic Modes: Flat Universes,JCAP03 (2018) 013 [1710.02177]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  46. [46]

    Finelli, G

    B. Finelli, G. Goon, E. Pajer and L. Santoni,Soft Theorems For Shift-Symmetric Cosmologies,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 063531 [1711.03737]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  47. [47]

    Holman and A.J

    R. Holman and A.J. Tolley,Enhanced Non-Gaussianity from Excited Initial States,JCAP 05(2008) 001 [0710.1302]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  48. [48]

    Agarwal, R

    N. Agarwal, R. Holman, A.J. Tolley and J. Lin,Effective field theory and non-Gaussianity from general inflationary states,JHEP05(2013) 085 [1212.1172]. 136

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  49. [49]

    Green and R.A

    D. Green and R.A. Porto,Signals of a Quantum Universe,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 251302

    2020

  50. [50]

    Creminelli, S

    P. Creminelli, S. Kumar, B. Salehian and L. Santoni,Dissipative Inflation via Scalar Production,2305.07695

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    Finelli, G

    B. Finelli, G. Goon, E. Pajer and L. Santoni,The Effective Theory of Shift-Symmetric Cosmologies,JCAP05(2018) 060 [1802.01580]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  52. [52]

    Pajer,Building a Boostless Bootstrap for the Bispectrum,JCAP01(2021) 023 [2010.12818]

    E. Pajer,Building a Boostless Bootstrap for the Bispectrum,JCAP01(2021) 023 [2010.12818]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  53. [53]

    Jazayeri, E

    S. Jazayeri, E. Pajer and D. Stefanyszyn,From locality and unitarity to cosmological correlators,JHEP10(2021) 065 [2103.08649]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    Berera,Warm inflation,Phys

    A. Berera,Warm inflation,Phys. Rev. Lett.75(1995) 3218

    1995

  55. [55]

    Berera and L.-Z

    A. Berera and L.-Z. Fang,Thermally induced density perturbations in the inflation era, Phys. Rev. Lett.74(1995) 1912

    1995

  56. [56]

    Berera,Warm inflation at arbitrary adiabaticity: A Model, an existence proof for inflationary dynamics in quantum field theory,Nucl

    A. Berera,Warm inflation at arbitrary adiabaticity: A Model, an existence proof for inflationary dynamics in quantum field theory,Nucl. Phys. B585(2000) 666 [hep-ph/9904409]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  57. [57]

    Gupta, A

    S. Gupta, A. Berera, A.F. Heavens and S. Matarrese,Non-Gaussian signatures in the cosmic background radiation from warm inflation,Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 043510 [astro-ph/0205152]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  58. [58]

    Berera, I.G

    A. Berera, I.G. Moss and R.O. Ramos,Warm Inflation and its Microphysical Basis,Rept. Prog. Phys.72(2009) 026901

    2009

  59. [59]

    Bastero-Gil, A

    M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera, R.O. Ramos and J.G. Rosa,Adiabatic out-of-equilibrium solutions to the Boltzmann equation in warm inflation,JHEP02(2018) 063 [1711.09023]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  60. [60]

    Hongo, S

    M. Hongo, S. Kim, T. Noumi and A. Ota,Effective field theory of time-translational symmetry breaking in nonequilibrium open system,JHEP02(2019) 131 [1805.06240]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  61. [61]

    Hongo, S

    M. Hongo, S. Kim, T. Noumi and A. Ota,Effective Lagrangian for Nambu-Goldstone modes in nonequilibrium open systems,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 056020 [1907.08609]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    Akyuz, G

    C.O. Akyuz, G. Goon and R. Penco,The Schwinger-Keldysh Coset Construction, 2306.17232

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  63. [63]

    P.H.C. Lau, K. Nishii and T. Noumi,Gravitational EFT for dissipative open systems, 2412.21136

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [64]

    Burgess, R

    C.P. Burgess, R. Holman and D. Hoover,Decoherence of inflationary primordial fluctuations,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 063534 [astro-ph/0601646]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  65. [65]

    Burgess, R

    C.P. Burgess, R. Holman, G. Tasinato and M. Williams,EFT Beyond the Horizon: Stochastic Inflation and How Primordial Quantum Fluctuations Go Classical,JHEP03 (2015) 090 [1408.5002]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  66. [66]

    Burgess, R

    C.P. Burgess, R. Holman and G. Tasinato,Open EFTs, IR effects & late-time resummations: systematic corrections in stochastic inflation,JHEP01(2016) 153 [1512.00169]. 137

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  67. [67]

    Starobinsky,Stochastic de Sitter (inflationary) stage in the early universe, Lect.Notes Phys.246(1986) 107

    A.A. Starobinsky,Stochastic de Sitter (inflationary) stage in the early universe, Lect.Notes Phys.246(1986) 107

    1986

  68. [68]

    Starobinsky and J

    A.A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama,Equilibrium state of a selfinteracting scalar field in the De Sitter background,Phys. Rev.D50(1994) 6357

    1994

  69. [69]

    C´ espedes, A.-C

    S. C´ espedes, A.-C. Davis and D.-G. Wang,On the IR divergences in de Sitter space: loops, resummation and the semi-classical wavefunction,JHEP04(2024) 004 [2311.17990]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    Grain and V

    J. Grain and V. Vennin,Stochastic inflation in phase space: Is slow roll a stochastic attractor?,JCAP05(2017) 045 [1703.00447]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  71. [71]

    Christie, J

    R. Christie, J. Joo, G. Kaplanek, V. Vennin and D. Wands,Quantum stochastic inflation, 2606.12636. 138

    Pith/arXiv arXiv