Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 89 references

The paper argues that switching on noncommutativity changes the holographic thermodynamic topology of charged AdS black holes from +1 to 0, and that bulk and boundary charges agree.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 00:01 UTC pith:5MSEBBXD

load-bearing objection The claimed W=+1→0 transition and the bulk–boundary match rest on a factor-of-three inconsistency in the bulk free energy and on boundary roots computed outside the paper's own α ≪ r₊ regime. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.15150 v1 pith:5MSEBBXD submitted 2026-07-16 gr-qc

Noncommutative black holes: Topological bulk-boundary correspondence and Binary Merger Bounds

Ankit Anand , Anshul Mishra , Aditya Singh , Saeed Noori Gashti , Neeraj Kumar , Phongpichit Channuie This is my paper
classification gr-qc PACS 04.70.-s04.70.Dy
keywords noncommutative black holesthermodynamic topologywinding numberbulk-boundary correspondenceReissner-Nordström-AdSgeneralized free energybinary black hole mergerminimal length
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies charged, anti-de Sitter black holes whose mass and charge are smeared over a minimal length scale, as suggested by noncommutative geometry. Using a perturbative expansion in the noncommutativity parameter α plus numerical root-finding, it tracks the thermodynamic phases through the winding number of an off-shell free-energy vector field. Its central claim is that any nonzero α produces a new ultra-small black hole branch with negative winding, so the total bulk topological charge changes to W = 0, and the boundary CFT charge changes from +1 to 0 as well. The authors read this as a bulk–boundary correspondence in topological class: W = +1 marks a classical singular interior, W = 0 marks a geometry regularized by a minimal length. They also derive a lower bound on the remnant mass of binary mergers from the second law and show noncommutative corrections shift that bound non-monotonically.

Core claim

For the Lorentzian-smeared noncommutative RN-AdS black hole, with the metric expanded to second order in α, the boundary temperature acquires a positive term that diverges like 1/r₊⁴ as the horizon radius shrinks. This forces the temperature curve to cross the on-shell condition a fourth time at a very small radius, creating a new branch with winding number −1. Added to the usual sequence +1, −1, +1, this gives a total boundary topological charge W = 0. The same W = 0 is found numerically in the bulk for both subcritical and supercritical pressures, at both linear and quadratic order in α. The paper concludes that the topological class of noncommutative charged AdS black holes is W = 0, that

What carries the argument

The generalized off-shell free energy F = M − S/τ, together with the auxiliary two-component vector field φ = (∂F/∂r₊, −cotθ cscθ), whose zeros are black hole phases and whose winding numbers are computed from sgn(∂²F/∂r₊²). The load-bearing piece is the leading noncommutative correction to the boundary CFT temperature: a positive, 1/r₊⁴-divergent term that flips the small-horizon asymptotics, creates the fourth root, and thereby flips the total winding number. The perturbative expansions of mass, entropy, and temperature in powers of α carry the computation.

Load-bearing premise

The new small-horizon branch is computed from perturbative temperature and free energy in a regime where α/r₊ is order one, while the perturbative expansion is justified only for α ≪ r₊; if the exact smeared-geometry thermodynamics do not produce the sign flip at small r₊, the topological transition W = +1 → 0 and the bulk–boundary match are unsupported.

What would settle it

Compute the exact, nonperturbative Hawking temperature or boundary CFT temperature from the Lorentzian-smeared metric near r₊ ≈ α (for example α = 0.05, Q = 1). If T(r₊) does not turn from negative to positive as r₊ decreases, so no fourth root exists, then the negative-winding branch disappears and the total charge returns to the commutative value, falsifying the claimed topological transition.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Any nonzero noncommutative parameter, with Q > 0 and ℓ > 0, forces the boundary topological charge to W = 0, independent of the specific charge, AdS scale, central charge, and boundary volume.
  • The bulk and boundary thermodynamic topologies match: both give W = 0 for α > 0, while the boundary gives W = +1 for α = 0.
  • The ratio of the minimal inversion temperature to the critical temperature remains exactly 1/2 even though noncommutativity shifts both temperatures individually.
  • The second-law lower bound on the remnant mass of a head-on merger of two identical charged black holes is modified at first and second order in α, initially rising then falling, which changes the maximum gravitational-wave energy that can be emitted.
  • For fixed reservoir temperature, the number of black hole branches depends on α, but the total winding number W = 0 is fixed, placing noncommutative black holes in a different topological class from RN-AdS black holes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the W = +1 → 0 transition survives an exact treatment, the topological charge becomes a boundary-computable marker of singularity resolution: any holographic model that regularizes the classical singular interior should exhibit W = 0, so the same criterion could be applied to other ultraviolet-modified black holes.
  • The paper's new roots at r₊ ≈ α lie outside its stated perturbative regime α ≪ r₊; checking whether the exact smeared-geometry temperature also flips sign at small r₊ would determine whether the new branch is physical or an artifact of the expansion.
  • The merger bound is derived for identical, head-on, charged black holes; extending it to unequal masses and charges, and to rotating mergers, would yield testable thermodynamic inequalities for gravitational-wave events if α is ever constrained.
  • Because the topological class change is argued to hold for arbitrarily small α > 0, the result predicts an abrupt topological switch at infinitesimal noncommutativity, which could be probed by studying the fully nonlinear smeared solution without perturbative truncation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies charged AdS black holes in a noncommutative spacetime with Lorentzian-smeared mass and charge distributions. Since exact analytical solutions are not available, the authors work perturbatively in the noncommutative parameter α up to O(α²). They compute thermodynamic quantities, critical points, and Joule–Thomson inversion curves. Using the generalized off-shell free-energy framework, they compute topological winding numbers in the bulk (§4) and in the dual CFT (§5), claiming that α>0 changes the global topological charge from W=+1 (RN-AdS) to W=0, and that bulk and boundary descriptions share this topology. They also use the second law to derive a lower bound on the remnant mass after binary mergers (§6). The central claim is that W=0 is a topological signature of a minimal length scale regularizing the bulk singularity.

Significance. If correct, the paper would establish a new holographic topological diagnostic: a sharp, α-independent transition W=+1→0 that distinguishes singular classical geometries from UV-regularized ones, and a bulk–boundary match in a noncommutative setting. The perturbative computation of critical quantities and the JT inversion ratio in Eq. (3.15) are useful checks. However, the two load-bearing pillars of the paper—the bulk free energy and the boundary small-r branch—are not sound as presented. The bulk free energy is inconsistent with the paper's own mass formula by a factor of three, and the boundary transition relies on perturbative expressions at r+≈α, precisely where the expansion is invalid. The paper is honest about the perturbative regime in §6 but does not respect it in the topological sections. The significance of the claimed result would be high if established, but the current analysis does not support it.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4, Eq. (4.11), Tables 2–4] The bulk off-shell free energy is inconsistent with the paper's own mass formula. Under the standard convention P=3/(8πℓ²), the RN–AdS mass from Eq. (3.2) is M_RN = r+/2 + Q²/(2r+) + (4πP/3) r+³. The zeroth-order terms of Eq. (4.11) give (8πP r+⁴τ)/(2r+τ) = 4πP r+³, a factor of three larger than (4πP/3) r+³. Therefore the roots and winding numbers in Tables 2–4, and the bulk result W=0, are computed from a free energy that does not follow from the mass in Eq. (3.2). The bulk topological analysis must be redone with the correct coefficient.
  2. [§5, Eq. (5.5); §7; §6, Eq. (6.1)] The new boundary branch and the W=+1→0 transition rely on the positive divergence +3αQ̃²/(8πR√c r+⁴) in the perturbative temperature. This term dominates only for r+ ≲ α, where the expansion in Eq. (3.1) is not valid; §6 explicitly restricts the perturbative approximation to α ≪ r+. For the exact Lorentzian-smeared geometry of Eqs. (2.10)–(2.11), m(r), q(r) ~ r³ and f(r)→1 as r→0, so the exact temperature T_exact = f'(r+)/(4π) → 0, not +∞. Hence the claimed ultra-small branch with w(0)=−1 and the topological transition are artifacts of using the perturbative temperature outside its domain. A non-perturbative or resummed calculation is required to establish W=0 for α>0.
  3. [§7, bullet 'consistent to all perturbative orders'] The assertion that the new root's existence is 'consistent to all perturbative orders' and persists for the exact theory for any α>0 is not proven. The perturbative coefficients are derived only to O(α²) in Eqs. (3.2), (3.3), and (5.5); there is no resummation or error estimate. Given the exact T→0 behavior noted above, the extrapolation to all orders appears false. The interpretive claim that W=0 'characterizes systems whose gravitational duals incorporate a fundamental minimal length scale' is therefore unsupported.
  4. [§6, Eq. (6.8); Appendix A] The second-order correction to the minimum horizon radius contains ln(r_i/ℓ0) with ℓ0 an arbitrary reference length. Since ℓ0 is not fixed by any physical scale, the O(α²) term—and hence the numerical values of the final-mass bound in Figures 3–5—is not well defined. The authors should either show that the ℓ0 dependence cancels in a physical observable or fix ℓ0 by a physical scale; otherwise the merger bounds are defined only up to an O(α²) ambiguity.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4, around Eq. (4.13)] The text says 'From Eq. (3)' but should reference Eq. (4.20); also 'NC black string' near Eq. (4.14) should be 'NC black hole'.
  2. [Table 4, P>Pc row] For α=0.10, the small root r+=0.101 is again at r+≈α; conclusions drawn from this row are subject to Major Comment 2.
  3. [§6, notation] The notation ℓ0 in Eq. (6.4) versus ℓ in Eq. (6.9) is confusing; the merger section uses both without defining their relation.
  4. [References [64,93]] Self-citations are used to support the sign–stability interpretation; the same interpretation already appears in [33], so the attribution should be clarified to avoid implying novelty.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

The advertised bulk–boundary 'identical topological charge' is an identity inherited from the holographic dictionary and the off-shell free-energy definition; the W=+1→0 transition itself is not circular.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Section 5, Eqs. (5.1), (5.6), (5.8)]
    "˜E = M ℓ/R = M/ω, ˜S = S, ˜T = T ℓ/R = T/ω ... Following Eq. (4.1), we introduce an off-shell generalized free energy ˜F = ˜E − ˜S/˜τ ... The total topological charge W for a given set of parameters (˜τ , ˜Q, V, c) is the sum of winding numbers of all enclosed zero points."

    The dictionary (5.1) and the definition (5.6) imply, with τ̃ = ωτ, that F̃ = (M − S/τ)/ω because Ẽ = M/ω and S̃ = S. Therefore ∂²F̃/∂r+² = (1/ω)∂²F/∂r+², a positive rescaling of the bulk second derivative. Equation (4.10) then makes every winding number, and hence the total W, identical by construction for any black-hole free energy, independent of noncommutativity. The paper's claimed 'demonstration' that bulk and boundary have identical global thermodynamic topology is thus a restatement of the dictionary and the off-shell definition, not an independent result.

full rationale

The α-expansion coefficients are obtained analytically from the metric (3.1), and the winding numbers are computed from the resulting off-shell free energies; no parameter is fitted to the topological charges, so there is no fitted-input-called-prediction circularity. The self-citations [64,93] are used only to interpret the sign of the winding number as stability, an interpretation already present in external references [33,34]; removing those citations would not change the computed W values, so they are not load-bearing. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and the cosh/perturbative structure is not smuggled in via citation. The serious concern that the new ultra-small branch sits at r+ ≈ α, where the paper's own validity condition α ≪ r+ (Eq. 6.1) fails, is a correctness/regime-of-validity objection rather than a circularity. The one genuine circular step is the bulk–boundary equivalence: because the boundary energy and temperature are rescaled versions of the bulk ones, and the off-shell free energy is defined in the same way, the boundary winding number is a positive-scaled copy of the bulk winding number. Hence the paper's advertised 'identical global thermodynamic topology' reduces to the dictionary by construction, although the central W=+1→0 transition for α>0 is derived independently of that identity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 7 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on the noncommutative smearing model, the off-shell topological framework, the holographic dictionary, and the perturbative expansion in α. The expansion's validity (α≪r+) is violated at the new branches that produce the claimed topological transition, and the merger bound inherits an arbitrary scale ℓ0 from the logarithmic entropy.

free parameters (2)
  • α (noncommutative parameter) = not fitted (model parameter)
    Central expansion parameter; no value is predicted or measured; the paper varies it to 0.05-2.0 in plots beyond its own validity bound.
  • ℓ0 (logarithm reference length)
    Introduced to make the α^2 log term dimensionless in the entropy (Eq. 3.3) and remnant radius (Eq. 6.8); the O(α^2) merger bound and Figures 3-5 depend on it, but it is never fixed.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption Lorentzian smearing profiles (Eq. 2.6) replace point-like mass and charge by smeared distributions with scale √Θ.
    The whole noncommutative black-hole model comes from [20,21]; the paper adopts it without independent evidence.
  • domain assumption Thermodynamic quantities are expanded perturbatively in α and truncated at O(α^2); validity requires α ≪ r+.
    States in Eq. (6.1); Sections 4-5 rely on roots with α/r+ ~ O(1) without enforcing it.
  • domain assumption Λ is treated as thermodynamic pressure P = 3/(8πℓ^2); inflection-point conditions define criticality.
    Standard extended thermodynamics from [84,85]; used for Eqs. (3.4)-(3.6).
  • domain assumption The off-shell free energy F = M - S/τ and vector field (∂F/∂r+, -cotΘcscΘ) define winding numbers classifying thermodynamic phases.
    Framework from [33,34]; the paper relies on the sign theorem from [93].
  • domain assumption The boundary CFT dictionary (Eq. 5.1): Ẽ=M/ω, Ṡ=S, Ṭ=T/ω, Q̃=Qℓ/√G, with central charge c and variable volume.
    Holographic thermodynamics from [69,75]; used for the boundary winding computation.
  • domain assumption Generalized second law with equality giving the minimum remnant: S_f = 2S_i, and charge conservation Q_f = 2Q_i for identical mergers.
    Standard GSL from [5,77]; used in Section 6.
  • ad hoc to paper The new small-horizon branch's existence is 'consistent to all perturbative orders' and persists for the exact theory for any α>0.
    Section 5 asserts this without a nonperturbative computation; contradicted by the stated validity region in Eq. (6.1).
invented entities (1)
  • Ultra-small black hole (USBH) branch at r+ ∼ α in the boundary CFT no independent evidence
    purpose: Provides the extra winding −1 defect that flips the boundary topological charge from W=+1 to W=0.
    Predicted solely from the leading perturbative α term in Ṭ(r+) in a regime where the expansion is uncontrolled; no independent falsifiable handle is given.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 22492 in / 38752 out tokens · 281720 ms · 2026-08-02T00:01:58.480148+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the thermodynamic topology of charged AdS black holes in a non-commutative spacetime sourced by Lorentzian-smeared matter distributions. Since exact analytical solutions for the critical thermodynamic quantities are not available, we employ a perturbative expansion in the non-commutative parameter and validate the resulting expressions through numerical analysis. Using the generalized off-shell free-energy framework, we explore the topological structure of the thermodynamic phase space and evaluate the corresponding winding number that characterizes the phase transitions. Our results reveal that non-commutative effects introduce qualitative modifications to the thermodynamic behavior compared with the standard Reissner-Nordstr\"om AdS black hole. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the bulk and boundary descriptions possess an identical global thermodynamic topology, providing strong evidence for the correspondence between their topological structures. We also investigate the lower bound on the remnant mass implied by the second law of black-hole thermodynamics and observe that non-commutative corrections modify key thermodynamic quantities, with particular emphasis on the entropy and the final black-hole mass.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15150 by Aditya Singh, Ankit Anand, Anshul Mishra, Neeraj Kumar, Phongpichit Channuie, Saeed Noori Gashti.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Normalized mass and charge profiles for Lorentzian smearing with Θ = 1. where α = 8q Θ π . The profiles in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Left: Equation of state, i.e., P − v diagram for fixed value of α = 0.05 and charge Q = 1. Right: P − v diagram for fixed charge Q = 1 for α = 0.1. where PRN (T, v) is the equation of state for the RN case and already derived in [85]. The critical point of the small/large black-hole phase transition is located by the inflection point conditions of the P −v isotherm [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Final black-hole mass Mf as a function of the NC parameter α for Mi = 3, Qi = 1, and l = 1. We next examine the dependence of the final-mass bound on the initial mass and charge, as shown in Figures 4 and 5. The charge values are chosen such that the black holes re￾main away from the extremal limit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Final black-hole mass Mf as a function of the NC parameter α for Mi = 2, 3, 4, with Qi = 1 and l = 1. Qi = 2 Qi = 1.5 Qi = 1 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Non Commutative Parameter alpha α Final Mass Mf l = 1, Mi=4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Final black-hole mass Mf as a function of the NC parameter α for Mi = 4, Qi = 1, 1.5, 2, and l = 1. radiation. The modification of the minimum allowed final mass directly translates into a corresponding change in the maximum amount of gravitational-wave energy that can be emitted during the merger. Although the parameter α is expected to be extremely small, these results provide an analytical framework for… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 68 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    The Four laws of black hole mechanics,

    J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter, and S. W. Hawking, “The Four laws of black hole mechanics,” Commun. Math. Phys. 31 (1973) 161–170

    1973

  2. [2]

    Black holes and the second law,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Black holes and the second law,” Lett. Nuovo Cim. 4 (1972) 737–740

    1972

  3. [3]

    Black holes and entropy,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Black holes and entropy,” Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 2333–2346

    1973

  4. [5]

    Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black hole physics,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black hole physics,” Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 3292–3300

    1974

  5. [6]

    Particle Creation by Black Holes,

    S. W. Hawking, “Particle Creation by Black Holes,” Commun. Math. Phys. 43 (1975) 199–220. [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

    1975

  6. [7]

    Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity,

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2752–2756

    1977

  7. [8]

    Temperature, energy and heat capacity of asymptotically anti-de Sitter black holes,

    J. D. Brown, J. Creighton, and R. B. Mann, “Temperature, energy and heat capacity of asymptotically anti-de Sitter black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 6394–6403 , arXiv:gr-qc/9405007

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  8. [9]

    Euclidean Schwarzschild negative mode,

    B. Allen, “Euclidean Schwarzschild negative mode,” Phys. Rev. D 30 (1984) 1153–1157

    1984

  9. [10]

    Black hole thermodynamics and the Euclidean Einstein action,

    J. W. York, Jr., “Black hole thermodynamics and the Euclidean Einstein action,” Phys. Rev. D 33 (1986) 2092–2099

    1986

  10. [11]

    Action Principle and Partition Function for the Gravitational Field in Black Hole Topologies,

    B. F. Whiting and J. W. York, Jr., “Action Principle and Partition Function for the Gravitational Field in Black Hole Topologies,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988) 1336

    1988

  11. [12]

    Some speculations about black hole entropy in string theory,

    L. Susskind, “Some speculations about black hole entropy in string theory,” arXiv:hep-th/9309145

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [13]

    A correspondence principle for black holes and strings,

    G. T. Horowitz and J. Polchinski, “A correspondence principle for black holes and strings,” Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 6189–6197 , hep-th/9612146

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  13. [14]

    Loop quantum gravity,

    C. Rovelli, “Loop quantum gravity,” Living Rev. Rel. 1 (1998) 1 , gr-qc/9710008

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  14. [15]

    Background independent quantum gravity: A status report,

    A. Ashtekar and J. Lewandowski, “Background independent quantum gravity: A status report,” Class. Quant. Grav. 21 (2004) R53–R152 , gr-qc/0404018. 27

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  15. [17]

    Noncommutative gauge field theories: A no-go theorem,

    M. Chaichian, P. Presnajder, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, and A. Tureanu, “Noncommutative gauge field theories: A no-go theorem,” Phys. Lett. B 526 (2002) 132–136, hep-th/0107037

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  16. [18]

    Noncommutative field theory,

    M. R. Douglas and N. A. Nekrasov, “Noncommutative field theory,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 73 (2001) 977–1029 , hep-th/0106048

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  17. [19]

    Hamiltonian structures on lie groups, lie bialgebras and the geometric meaning of the classical yang–baxter equations,

    V. G. Drinfel’d, “Hamiltonian structures on lie groups, lie bialgebras and the geometric meaning of the classical yang–baxter equations,” Sov. Math. Dokl. 27 (1983) 68–71

    1983

  18. [20]

    Noncommutative geometry inspired schwarzschild black hole,

    P. Nicolini, A. Smailagic, and E. Spallucci, “Noncommutative geometry inspired schwarzschild black hole,” Phys. Lett. B 632 (2006) 547–551, gr-qc/0510112

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  19. [21]

    Noncommutative geometry inspired charged black holes,

    S. Ansoldi, P. Nicolini, A. Smailagic, and E. Spallucci, “Noncommutative geometry inspired charged black holes,” Phys. Lett. B 645 (2007) 261–266, gr-qc/0612035

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  20. [23]

    Noncommutativity and logarithmic correction to the black hole entropy,

    K. S. Gupta, T. Jurić, A. Samsarov, and I. Smolić, “Noncommutativity and logarithmic correction to the black hole entropy,” JHEP 02 (2023) 060 , arXiv:2209.07168 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  21. [24]

    Gravitational probe of quantum spacetime,

    N. Herceg, T. Juric, A. Samsarov, I. Smolic, and K. S. Gupta, “Gravitational probe of quantum spacetime,” Phys. Lett. B 854 (2024) 138716 , arXiv:2310.06018 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  22. [25]

    Metric perturbations in noncommutative gravity,

    N. Herceg, T. Jurić, A. Samsarov, and I. Smolić, “Metric perturbations in noncommutative gravity,” JHEP 06 (2024) 130 , arXiv:2310.06038 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  23. [26]

    Noncommutative quasinormal modes of Schwarzschild black hole,

    N. Herceg, T. Jurić, A. N. Kumara, A. Samsarov, and I. Smolić, “Noncommutative quasinormal modes of Schwarzschild black hole,” JHEP 05 (2025) 083 , arXiv:2409.01402 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [27]

    Noncommutative Quasinormal Modes and the Violation of Isospectrality,

    N. Herceg, T. Jurić, A. N. Kumara, A. Samsarov, and I. Smolić, “Noncommutative Quasinormal Modes and the Violation of Isospectrality,” 3, 2025. arXiv:2503.15181 [gr-qc]. 28

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [28]

    Near-horizon aspects of black holes in quantum spacetime,

    N. Herceg, T. Jurić, A. N. Kumara, A. Samsarov, and I. Smolić, “Near-horizon aspects of black holes in quantum spacetime,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2912 no. 1, (2024) 012032 , arXiv:2410.00088 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  26. [29]

    Cosmological production of noncommutative black holes,

    R. B. Mann and P. Nicolini, “Cosmological production of noncommutative black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 064014 , arXiv:1102.5096 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  27. [30]

    Towards Noncommutative Quantum Black Holes,

    J. C. Lopez-Dominguez, O. Obregon, M. Sabido, and C. Ramirez, “Towards Noncommutative Quantum Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 084024 , arXiv:hep-th/0607002

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  28. [31]

    Charged rotating noncommutative black holes,

    L. Modesto and P. Nicolini, “Charged rotating noncommutative black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 104035 , arXiv:1005.5605 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  29. [32]

    Thermodynamics of Schwarzschild-AdS black hole in non-commutative geometry,

    R.-B. Wang, S.-J. Ma, L. You, J.-B. Deng, and X.-R. Hu, “Thermodynamics of Schwarzschild-AdS black hole in non-commutative geometry,” Chin. Phys. C 49 no. 6, (2025) 065101 , arXiv:2410.03650 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  30. [33]

    Black Hole Solutions as Topological Thermodynamic Defects,

    S.-W. Wei, Y.-X. Liu, and R. B. Mann, “Black Hole Solutions as Topological Thermodynamic Defects,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 no. 19, (2022) 191101 , arXiv:2208.01932 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  31. [34]

    Topology of black hole thermodynamics,

    S.-W. Wei and Y.-X. Liu, “Topology of black hole thermodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 10, (2022) 104003 , arXiv:2112.01706 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  32. [35]

    Topological Classes of BTZ Black Holes,

    Y. Du, H. Li, and X. Zhang, “Topological Classes of BTZ Black Holes,” Symmetry 16 no. 12, (2024) 1577 , arXiv:2302.11189 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  33. [36]

    Topological classes of rotating black holes,

    D. Wu, “Topological classes of rotating black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 2, (2023) 024024, arXiv:2211.15151 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  34. [38]

    Topological natures of the Gauss-Bonnet black hole in AdS space,

    C. Liu and J. Wang, “Topological natures of the Gauss-Bonnet black hole in AdS space,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 6, (2023) 064023 , arXiv:2211.05524 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  35. [39]

    Topology of black hole thermodynamics in Lovelock gravity,

    N.-C. Bai, L. Li, and J. Tao, “Topology of black hole thermodynamics in Lovelock gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 6, (2023) 064015 , arXiv:2208.10177 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  36. [40]

    Topology of Born-Infeld AdS black holes in 4D novel Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity,

    P. K. Yerra and C. Bhamidipati, “Topology of Born-Infeld AdS black holes in 4D novel Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity,” Phys. Lett. B 835 (2022) 137591 , arXiv:2207.10612 [gr-qc]. 29

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  37. [41]

    Bardeen black hole thermodynamics from topological perspective,

    J. Sadeghi, S. Noori Gashti, M. R. Alipour, and M. A. S. Afshar, “Bardeen black hole thermodynamics from topological perspective,” Annals Phys. 455 (2023) 169391 , arXiv:2306.05692 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  38. [42]

    Topological classes of thermodynamics of the four-dimensional static accelerating black holes,

    D. Wu, “Topological classes of thermodynamics of the four-dimensional static accelerating black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 8, (2023) 084041 , arXiv:2307.02030 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  39. [43]

    Topological classes of thermodynamics of rotating AdS black holes,

    D. Wu and S.-Q. Wu, “Topological classes of thermodynamics of rotating AdS black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 8, (2023) 084002 , arXiv:2301.03002 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  40. [44]

    Topological classes of thermodynamics of the static multi-charge AdS black holes in gauged supergravities: novel temperature-dependent thermodynamic topological phase transition,

    D. Wu, S.-Y. Gu, X.-D. Zhu, Q.-Q. Jiang, and S.-Z. Yang, “Topological classes of thermodynamics of the static multi-charge AdS black holes in gauged supergravities: novel temperature-dependent thermodynamic topological phase transition,” JHEP 06 (2024) 213 , arXiv:2402.00106 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  41. [45]

    Thermodynamic topology of Black Holes in F (R)-Euler-Heisenberg gravity’s Rainbow,

    Y. Sekhmani, S. Noori Gashti, M. A. S. Afshar, M. R. Alipour, J. Sadeghi, B. Pourhassan, and J. Rayimbaev, “Thermodynamic topology of Black Holes in F (R)-Euler-Heisenberg gravity’s Rainbow,” arXiv:2409.04997 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [46]

    Consistent thermodynamics and topological classes for the four-dimensional Lorentzian charged Taub-NUT spacetimes,

    D. Wu, “Consistent thermodynamics and topological classes for the four-dimensional Lorentzian charged Taub-NUT spacetimes,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83 no. 7, (2023) 589 , arXiv:2306.02324 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  43. [47]

    Thermodynamic topology, photon spheres, and evidence for weak gravity conjecture in charged black holes with perfect fluid within rastall theory,

    S. N. Gashti, I. Sakalli, and B. Pourhassan, “Thermodynamic topology, photon spheres, and evidence for weak gravity conjecture in charged black holes with perfect fluid within rastall theory,” arXiv preprint (2024) , arXiv:2410.14492

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  44. [48]

    Weak gravity conjecture validation with photon spheres of quantum corrected ads–reissner–nordström black holes in kiselev spacetime,

    M. R. Alipour, M. A. S. Afshar, S. N. Gashti, and J. Sadeghi, “Weak gravity conjecture validation with photon spheres of quantum corrected ads–reissner–nordström black holes in kiselev spacetime,” Eur. Phys. J. C 84 no. 10, (2024) 888 , arXiv:2410.14352 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  45. [49]

    The role of topological photon spheres in constraining the parameters of black holes,

    J. Sadeghi and M. A. S. Afshar, “The role of topological photon spheres in constraining the parameters of black holes,” Astropart. Phys. 162 (2024) 102994 , arXiv:2405.06568 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  46. [50]

    Effective potential and topological photon spheres: a novel approach to black hole parameter classification,

    M. A. S. Afshar and J. Sadeghi, “Effective potential and topological photon spheres: a novel approach to black hole parameter classification,” Chin. Phys. C 49 no. 3, (2025) 035107, arXiv:2405.18798 [gr-qc] . 30

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  47. [51]

    Mutual influence of photon sphere and non-commutative parameter in various non-commutative black holes: Part i-towards evidence for wgc,

    M. A. S. Afshar and J. Sadeghi, “Mutual influence of photon sphere and non-commutative parameter in various non-commutative black holes: Part i-towards evidence for wgc,” arXiv preprint (2024) , arXiv:2411.09557

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  48. [52]

    Consistent thermodynamics and topological classes for the four-dimensional lorentzian neutral nut-charged spacetimes,

    D. Wu, “Consistent thermodynamics and topological classes for the four-dimensional lorentzian neutral nut-charged spacetimes,” The European Physical Journal C 85 (2023) 365

    2023

  49. [53]

    Thermodynamical topology of quantum BTZ black hole,

    S.-P. Wu and S.-W. Wei, “Thermodynamical topology of quantum BTZ black hole,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 2, (2024) 024054 , arXiv:2403.14167 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  50. [54]

    Bulk-boundary and RPS thermodynamics from topology perspective,

    J. Sadeghi, M. R. Alipour, S. Noori Gashti, and M. A. S. Afshar, “Bulk-boundary and RPS thermodynamics from topology perspective,” Chin. Phys. C 48 no. 9, (2024) 095106, arXiv:2306.16117 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  51. [55]

    Thermodynamic topology of quantum corrected AdS-Reissner-Nordstrom black holes in Kiselev spacetime,

    J. Sadeghi, S. Noori Gashti, M. R. Alipour, and M. A. S. Afshar, “Thermodynamic topology of quantum corrected AdS-Reissner-Nordstrom black holes in Kiselev spacetime,” Chin. Phys. C 48 no. 11, (2024) 115115 , arXiv:2408.09782 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  52. [56]

    Topology of Hayward-AdS black hole thermodynamics,

    J. Sadeghi, M. A. S. Afshar, S. Noori Gashti, and M. R. Alipour, “Topology of Hayward-AdS black hole thermodynamics,” Phys. Scripta 99 no. 2, (2024) 025003

    2024

  53. [57]

    Thermodynamic topology and photon spheres in the hyperscaling violating black holes,

    J. Sadeghi, M. A. S. Afshar, S. Noori Gashti, and M. R. Alipour, “Thermodynamic topology and photon spheres in the hyperscaling violating black holes,” Astropart. Phys. 156 (2024) 102920 , arXiv:2307.12873 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  54. [58]

    Thermodynamic Topology of Black Holes in f(R) Gravity,

    B. Hazarika and P. Phukon, “Thermodynamic Topology of Black Holes in f(R) Gravity,” PTEP 2024 no. 4, (2024) 043E01 , arXiv:2401.16756 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  55. [59]

    Thermodynamic topology and photon spheres of dirty black holes within non-extensive entropy,

    S. Noori Gashti, B. Pourhassan, İ. Sakallı, and A. B. Brzo, “Thermodynamic topology and photon spheres of dirty black holes within non-extensive entropy,” Phys. Dark Univ. 47 (2025) 101833

    2025

  56. [60]

    Topological insights into black hole thermodynamics: non-extensive entropy in CFT framework,

    M. A. S. Afshar, M. R. Alipour, S. Noori Gashti, and J. Sadeghi, “Topological insights into black hole thermodynamics: non-extensive entropy in CFT framework,” Eur. Phys. J. C 85 no. 4, (2025) 457 , arXiv:2501.00955 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  57. [61]

    Thermodynamic topology and phase space analysis of AdS black holes through non-extensive entropy perspectives,

    S. Noori Gashti, B. Pourhassan, and I. Sakalli, “Thermodynamic topology and phase space analysis of AdS black holes through non-extensive entropy perspectives,” Eur. Phys. J. C 85 no. 3, (2025) 305 , arXiv:2412.12137 [hep-th] . 31

    arXiv 2025

  58. [62]

    Topology of holographic thermodynamics within non-extensive entropy,

    S. N. Gashti, “Topology of holographic thermodynamics within non-extensive entropy,” Journal of Holography Applications in Physics 4 no. 4, (2024) 59–70, arXiv:2412.00889

    arXiv 2024

  59. [63]

    Topological classification and black hole thermodynamics,

    M. R. Alipour, M. A. S. Afshar, S. Noori Gashti, and J. Sadeghi, “Topological classification and black hole thermodynamics,” Phys. Dark Univ. 42 (2023) 101361 , arXiv:2305.05595 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  60. [64]

    Universality relation and thermodynamic topology with three-parameter entropy model,

    A. Anand and S. Noori Gashti, “Universality relation and thermodynamic topology with three-parameter entropy model,” Phys. Dark Univ. 48 (2025) 101916

    2025

  61. [65]

    Non-extensive entropy and holographic thermodynamics: Topological insights,

    S. N. Gashti and B. Pourhassan, “Non-extensive entropy and holographic thermodynamics: Topological insights,” The European Physical Journal C 85 (2025) 435, arXiv:2412.12132

    arXiv 2025

  62. [66]

    Holographic thermodynamics requires a chemical potential for color,

    M. R. Visser, “Holographic thermodynamics requires a chemical potential for color,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 10, (2022) 106014 , arXiv:2101.04145 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  63. [67]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231–252 , arXiv:hep-th/9711200

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  64. [68]

    Anti de Sitter space and holography,

    E. Witten, “Anti de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253–291, arXiv:hep-th/9802150

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  65. [69]

    Holographic Dual of Extended Black Hole Thermodynamics,

    M. B. Ahmed, W. Cong, D. Kubizňák, R. B. Mann, and M. R. Visser, “Holographic Dual of Extended Black Hole Thermodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 no. 18, (2023) 181401, arXiv:2302.08163 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  66. [70]

    Holographic thermodynamics of rotating black holes,

    T.-F. Gong, J. Jiang, and M. Zhang, “Holographic thermodynamics of rotating black holes,” JHEP 06 (2023) 105 , arXiv:2305.00267 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  67. [71]

    Holographic CFT phase transitions and criticality for rotating AdS black holes,

    M. B. Ahmed, W. Cong, D. Kubiznak, R. B. Mann, and M. R. Visser, “Holographic CFT phase transitions and criticality for rotating AdS black holes,” JHEP 08 (2023) 142, arXiv:2305.03161 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  68. [72]

    CFT phase transition analysis of charged, rotating black holes in D=4: A holographic thermodynamics approach,

    A. Baruah and P. Phukon, “CFT phase transition analysis of charged, rotating black holes in D=4: A holographic thermodynamics approach,” Phys. Rev. D 111 no. 6, (2025) 066022 , arXiv:2407.02997 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  69. [73]

    Holographic dictionary for Lifshitz and hyperscaling violating black holes,

    W. Cong, D. Kubizňák, R. B. Mann, and M. R. Visser, “Holographic dictionary for Lifshitz and hyperscaling violating black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 112 no. 6, (2025) L061901, arXiv:2410.16145 [hep-th] . 32

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  70. [74]

    Finite-cutoff Holographic Thermodynamics,

    M. Zhang, W.-D. Tan, M. Lu, D. Bhattacharya, J. Yang, and R. B. Mann, “Finite-cutoff Holographic Thermodynamics,” arXiv:2507.01010 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  71. [75]

    Bulk-boundary thermodynamic equivalence: a topology viewpoint,

    M. Zhang and J. Jiang, “Bulk-boundary thermodynamic equivalence: a topology viewpoint,” JHEP 06 (2023) 115 , arXiv:2303.17515 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  72. [76]

    A topological perspective on bulk boundary thermodynamic equivalence,

    S.-J. Yang, S.-P. Wu, S.-W. Wei, and Y.-X. Liu, “A topological perspective on bulk boundary thermodynamic equivalence,” arXiv:2512.21608 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  73. [77]

    Gravitational radiation from colliding black holes,

    S. W. Hawking, “Gravitational radiation from colliding black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 26 (1971) 1344–1346

    1971

  74. [78]

    Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger,

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al. , “Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 no. 6, (2016) 061102 , arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  75. [79]

    Gwtc-2: Compact binary coalescences observed by ligo and virgo during the first half of the third observing run,

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration Collaboration, R. Abbott et al. , “Gwtc-2: Compact binary coalescences observed by ligo and virgo during the first half of the third observing run,” Phys. Rev. X 11 no. 2, (2021) 021053 , arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  76. [80]

    Thermodynamics and Criticality of Noncommutative RN-AdS Black Holes,

    W. E. Hadri and M. Jemri, “Thermodynamics and Criticality of Noncommutative RN-AdS Black Holes,” arXiv:2509.00926 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  77. [81]

    P V criticality in the extended phase–space of charged accelerating AdS black holes,

    H. Liu and X.-h. Meng, “ P V criticality in the extended phase–space of charged accelerating AdS black holes,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 31 no. 37, (2016) 1650199 , arXiv:1607.00496 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  78. [82]

    Stability and criticality behaviors of accelerating charged AdS black holes in rainbow gravity,

    H. Belmahi, M. Jemri, and R. Salih, “Stability and criticality behaviors of accelerating charged AdS black holes in rainbow gravity,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 40 no. 35, (2025) 2550149, arXiv:2507.03572 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  79. [83]

    String theory and noncommutative geometry,

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “String theory and noncommutative geometry,” JHEP 9909 (1999) 032, arXiv:hep-th/9908142

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  80. [84]

    Black hole chemistry: thermodynamics with lambda,

    D. Kubiznak, R. B. Mann, and M. Teo, “Black hole chemistry: thermodynamics with lambda,” Class. Quant. Grav. 34 (2017) 063001, arXiv:1608.06147

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

Showing first 80 references.